library.uns.ac.id digilib.uns.ac.

id
248

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Abdi, M. U., Mustafa, M., & Pada, A. U. T. (2021). Penerapan pendekatan STEM
berbasis simulasi PhET untuk meningkatkan pemahaman konsep fisika
peserta didik. Jurnal IPA & Pembelajaran IPA, 5(3), 209–218.
https://doi.org/10.24815/jipi.v5i3.21774
Abdurrahman, Ariyani, F., Achmad, A., & Nurulsari, N. (2019). Designing an
inquiry-based STEM learning strategy as a powerful alternative solution to
enhance students’ 21st-century skills: A preliminary research. Journal of
Physics: Conference Series, 1155(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-
6596/1155/1/012087
Adams, W. K. (2010). Student engagement and learning with PhET interactive
simulations. Il Nuovo Cimento, 33(3), 21–32.
https://doi.org/10.1393/ncc/i2010-10623-0
Agustyaningrum, N., Sari, R. N., Abadi, A. M., & Mahmudi, A. (2020). Dominant
factors that cause students’ difficulties in learning abstract algebra: A case
study at a university in Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1),
847–866. https://doi.org/10.29333/IJI.2021.14151A
Aksit, O., & Wiebe, E. N. (2020). Exploring force and motion concepts in middle
grades using computational modeling: A classroom intervention
study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(1), 65-82.
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl Peter W Airasian, D. R., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer,
R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). Taxonomy for
learning teaching, assessing and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy
of educational objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to teach. New York: McGraw Hill.
Arini, D. S., Rahayu, S., & Kusairi, S. (2021). Efektivitas learning Ccycle 3E
berkonteks socioscientific issues terhadap pemahaman konsep dan
penjelasan ilmiah siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori,
Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 5(11), 1555.
https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i11.14154
Artayasa, I. P., Susilo, H., Lestari, U., & Indriwati, S. E. (2018). The effect of
three levels of inquiry on the improvement of science concept understanding
of elementary school teacher candidates. International Journal of Instruction,
11(2), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11216a
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., & Razavieh, A. (2018). Introduction to
research in education 8th edition. Canada: Nelson Education, Ltd.
https://www.ptonline.com/articles/how-to-get-better-mfi-results
Aşiksoy, G., & Islek, D. (2017). The impact of the virtual laboratory on students’
attitudes in a general physics laboratory. International Journal of Online
Engineering, 13(4), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v13i04.6811
Ausubel, D. P. (1960). The use of advanced organizers in the learning and
retention of meaningful verbal material. Journal of Educational Psychology,
51(5), 267–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046669
Ausubel, D. P. (1965). Perception versus cognition in meaningful verbal learning.
library.uns.ac.id digilib.uns.ac.id
249

Journal of General Psychology, 73(2), 185–187.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1965.9710712
Azizah, L. M., Poernomo, J. B., & Faqih, M. I. (2019). Pengembangan modul
pembelajaran fisika kelas XI MA/SMA berbasis guided inquiry pada materi
alat-alat optik. Physics Education Research Journal, 1(1), 11.
https://doi.org/10.21580/perj.2019.1.1.4006
Azzarkasyi, M., Rizal, S., & Kasmawati, K. (2019). The identification of student
misconceptions on the concept of electricity using the CRI decision matrix
three-level test. Asian Journal of Science Education, 1(1), 10–15.
Badeau, R., White, D. R., Ibrahim, B., Ding, L., & Heckler, A. F. (2017). What
works with worked examples: Extending self-explanation and analogical
comparison to synthesis problems. Physical Review Physics Education
Research, 13(2), 1–27.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020112
Bandoy, J. V. B., Pulido, M. T. R., & Sauquillo, D. J. (2016). The Effectiveness
of using PHET Simulations for Physics Classes: A Survey. Conference:
Conference: International Conference on Engineering Teaching and
Learning Innovation (ICEE-PHIL2015), Volume: In Press, October 2015, 1–
4. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282219928
Bell, R., Smetana, L., & Binns, I. (2005). Simplifying inquiry instruction. The
Science Teacher, 72(7), 30–33.
Bing, T. J., & Redish, E. F. (2007). The cognitive blending of mathematics and
physics knowledge. AIP Conference Proceedings, 883(1), 26–29.
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2508683
Bisra, K., Liu, Q., Nesbit, J. C., Salimi, F., & Winne, P. H. (2018). Inducing self-
explanation: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 703–
725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9434-x
Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What is
STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and
partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3-11.
Bruner, J. S. (2009). The process of education. Harvard: Harvard University
Press.
Buckwalter, W., & Turri, J. (2016). Perceived weaknesses of philosophical
inquiry: A comparison to psychology. Philosophia, 44(1), 95–110.
https://www.ptonline.com/articles/how-to-get-better-mfi-results
Budiyono. (2017). Pengantar metodologi penelitian pendidikan. Surakarta: UNS
Press.
Burghardt, M. D., & Hacker, M. (2004). Informed design: A contemporary
approach to design pedagogy as the core process in technology. Technology
Teacher, 64(1), 6–8.
Cai, S., Liu, C., Wang, T., Liu, E., & Liang, J. C. (2021). Effects of learning
physics using Augmented Reality on students’ self‐efficacy and conceptions
of learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(1), 235-251.
Cari, Nasir, M., Sunarno, W., & Rahmawati, F. (2022). Flipped classroom using
e-module to improve understanding of light concepts: Needs analysis of e-
module development to empower scientific explanation. Journal of Physics:
library.uns.ac.id digilib.uns.ac.id
250

Conference Series, 2165(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-

6596/2165/1/012040
Chang, B. (2019). Reflection in learning. Online Learning Journal, 23(1), 95–
110. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i1.1447
Chang, C. C., Yeh, T. K., & Shih, C. M. (2016). The effects of integrating
computer-based concept mapping for physics learning in junior high school.
Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(9),
2531–2542. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1284a
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.).
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Collette, A. ., & Chiappetta, A. . (1994). Science instruction in the middle and
secondary schools (3rd ed). New York: Merrill.
Daineko, Y., Ipalakova, M., Dmitriyev, V., Giyenko, A., & Rakhimzhanova, N.
(2015). 3D Physics virtual laboratory as a teaching platform. 2nd
International Conference on Augmented and Virtual Reality, AVR 2015,
9254, 458-466).
Davis, J. (2001). Conceptual Change. In M. Orey (Ed.), Emerging perspectives on
learning, teaching, and technology. Retrieved <20 December 2021>,
from http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/
de Oliveira Gabriel, V., Panisson, A. R., Bordini, R. H., Adamatti, D. F., & Billa,
C. Z. (2020). Reasoning in BDI agents using Toulmin's argumentation
model. Theoretical Computer Science, 805, 76-91.
Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J.O. (2015). The systematic design of instruction.
In Educational Technology Research and Development (Vol. 54). London:
Pearson Education Ltd.
Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific
argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-237x(200005)84:3<287::aid-
sce1>3.0.co;2-a
Effendi, A., & Fatimah, A. T. (2019). Implementasi model pembelajaran creative
problem solving untuk siswa kelas awal Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan.
Teorema: Teori dan Riset Matematika, 4(2), 89.
https://doi.org/10.25157/teorema.v4i2.2535
Englund, C., Olofsson, A. D., & Price, L. (2017). Teaching with technology in
higher education: understanding conceptual change and development in
practice. Higher Education Research and Development, 36(1), 73–87.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1171300
Feibleman, J. K. (1961). Pure science, applied science, technology, engineering:
An attempt at definitions. Technology and Culture, 2(4), 305.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3100886
Finkelstein, N., Adams, W., Keller, C., Perkins, K., & Wieman, C. (2006). High-
tech tools for teaching physics: The physics education technology project.
Physics Education, 2(3), 110–121.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt,
H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student
performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the
library.uns.ac.id digilib.uns.ac.id
251

National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(23),

8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Gagne, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1992). Principle of instructional
design. United States of America: Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
Gall, J. P., & Gall, M. D. (2003). Educational research: An introduction. United
States of America: Pearson Education.
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2012). Educational research:
Competencies for analysis and applications. United States of America:
Pearson Education.
Gott, R., & Duggan, S. (2007). A framework for practical work in science and
scientific literacy through argumentation. International Journal of
Phytoremediation, 25(3), 271–291.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140701535000
Gunawan, G., Nisrina, N., Suranti, N. M. Y., Herayanti, L., & Rahmatiah, R.
(2018). Virtual laboratory to improve students’ conceptual understanding in
physics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1108(1), 1–6.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012049
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods. American
Journal of Physics, 66(64), 64–74.
Hale, D., & Mullen, L. G. (2009). Designing process-oriented guided-inquiry
activities: A new innovationl for marketing classes. Marketing Education
Review, 19(1), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2009.11489063
Hasan, S., Bagayoko, D., & Kelley, E. L. (1999). Misconceptions and the
certainty of response index (CRI). Physics Education, 34(5), 294–299.
https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/34/5/304
Hatton, M. J. (1997). Lifelong learning: policies, practices, and programs.
Toronto: School of Media Studies.
Hidayatulloh, A. (2020). Analisis kesulitan belajar fisika materi elastisitas dan
hukum Hooke dalam penyelesaian soal – soal fisika. Kappa Journal, 4(1),
69–75. https://doi.org/10.29408/kpj.v4i1.1636
Hsu, C. C., Chiu, C. H., Lin, C. H., & Wang, T. I. (2015). Enhancing skill in
constructing scientific explanations using a structured argumentation scaffold
in scientific inquiry. Computers and Education, 91(1), 46–59.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.009
Hudha, S. N., Harmoko, U., Widada, S., Yusuf, D. H., Yulianto, G., & Sahid, S.
(2014). Penentuan Struktur Bawah Permukaan dengan Menggunakan Metode
Seismik Refraksi di Lapangan Panas Bumi Diwak dan Derekan, Kecamatan
Bergas, Kabupaten Semarang. Youngster Physics Journal, 3(3), 263-268.
Ikhwanuddin, Jaedun, A., & Purwantoro, D. (2010). Problem solving dalam
pembelajaran fisika untuk meningkatkan kemampuan mahasiswa berpikir
analitis. Jurnal Kependidikan, 40(2), 215–230.
Inah, E. N. (2015). Peran komunikasi dalam interaksi guru dan siswa. Al-Ta’dib,
8(2), 150–167.
Jackson, C. D., & Mohr-Schroeder, M. J. (2018). Increasing STEM literacy via an
informal learning environment. Journal of STEM Teacher Education, 53(1),
43–52. https://doi.org/10.30707/jste53
library.uns.ac.id digilib.uns.ac.id
252

Johns, G., & Mentzer, N. (2016). STEM integration through design and inquiry.
Technology and Engineering Teacher, 76(3), 13–17.
Jong, T. De. (2006). Technological advances in inquiry learning. Science, 312(1),
532–533. http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2006-05765-001
Joyce, B., & Weil, M. (2009). Models of teaching. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of
India.
Karwati, U.-. (2012). Aplikasi model pembelajaran sinektik (synectic model).
Jurnal Seni & Budaya Panggung, 22(2), 147–159.
https://doi.org/10.26742/panggung.v22i2.57
Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated
STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1–11.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
Kemendikbud. (2017). Modul-1 fisika paket C safari ke Pulau Fisika setara
SMA/MA. http://repository.ut.ac.id/3891/1/EKSI4417-M1.pdf
Kennedy, T. J., & Odell, M. R. L. (2014). Engaging students in STEM education.
Science Education International, 25(3), 246–258.
Kereh, C. T., Liliasari, L., Tjiang, P. C., & Sabandar, J. (2014). Korelasi
penguasaan materi matematika dasar dengan penguasaan materi pendahuluan
fisika inti. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 10(2), 140–149.
https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v10i2.3350
Khoiriyah, I., Rosidin, U., & Suana, W. (2015). Perbandingan hasil belajar
menggunakan PhET simulation dan KIT optika melalui inkuiri terbimbing.
Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 3(5), 97–107. http://phet.colorado.edu.
Kind, P., & Osborne, J. (2017). Styles of scientific reasoning: A cultural rationale
for science education? Science Education, 101(2), 1–42.
Knowles, M. (1977). Adult learning processes: Pedagogy and andragogy.
Religious Education, 72(2), 202–211.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0034408770720210
Lederman, J. S., & Stefanich, G. P. (2007). Scientific Inquiry and Nature of
Science. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5814-1_4
Ling, S. J., Sanny, J., & Moeb, W. (2018). University Physics Volume 3. Texas:
Open Stax.
Liu, J., & Xin, Y. (2020). Quantum simulation of quantum field theories as
quantum chemistry. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2020(12), 1-48.
Ludäscher, P., Greffrath, W., Schmahl, C., Kleindienst, N., Kraus, A.,
Baumgärtner, U., Magerl, W., Treede, R. D., & Bohus, M. (2009). A cross-
sectional investigation of discontinuation of self-injury and normalizing pain
perception in patients with borderline personality disorder. Acta Psychiatrica
Scandinavica, 120(1), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-
0447.2008.01335.x
Mahjatia, N., Susilowati, E., & Miriam, S. (2021). Pengembangan LKPD berbasis
STEM untuk melatihkan keterampilan proses sains siswa melalui inkuiri
terbimbing. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 4(3), 139.
https://doi.org/10.20527/jipf.v4i3.2055
Maniotes, L. K., & Kuhlthau, C. C. (2014). Making the shift: From traditional
research to guiding inquiry learning. Knowledge Quest, 43(2), 8–17.
library.uns.ac.id digilib.uns.ac.id
253

McCredden, J., Reidsema, C., & Kavanagh, L. (2017). Designing an active

learning environment architecture within a flipped classroom for developing
first year student engineers. In The flipped classroom (pp. 97-129). Springer,
Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3413-8_7
McIntyre, L. (2019). The scientific attitude: Defending science from denial, fraud,
and pseudoscience. New York: MIT Press.
McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2008). Inquiry and scientific explanations: Helping
students use evidence and reasoning. Science as Inquiry in the Secondary
Setting, 11(1), 121–134.
McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. (2006). Supporting
students’ construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in
instructional materials. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 153–191.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1502_1
Messica, A., Greenstein, A., & Katzir, A. (1996). Theory of fiber-optic,
evanescent-wave spectroscopy and sensors. Applied Optics, 35(13), 2274.
https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.35.002274
Nasir, M., Cari, C., Sunarno, W., & Rahmawati, F. (2021). Article diagnostic
difficulties and misconceptions of light refraction: A need analysis learning
abstract concepts using PhET simulation. International Joint Conference on
Science and Engineering 2021 (IJCSE 2021), 209(1), 317–322.
https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/ijcse-21/125966549
Nasir, M., Harjono, A., & Sridana, N. (2015). Pengaruh pembelajaran
menggunakkan LKS inkuiri terintegrasi generik sains (ITGS) terhadap hasil
belajar fisika ditinjau dari motivasi berprestasi siswa di SMAN 1 Aikmel.
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 1(1), 78–90.
National Research Council. (2012). Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying
effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics
(Issue September). New York: National Academy of Sciences.
National Research Council, & M. L. S. C. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children
learn mathematics. New York: National Academies Press.
Nersessian, N. J. (2010). Creating Scientific Concepts. New York: MIT Press.
Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototyping to reach product quality. In Design approaches
and tools in education and training (pp. 125-135). Springer, Dordrecht.
Noroozi, O., Dehghanzadeh, H., & Talaee, E. (2020). A systematic review on the
impacts of game-based learning on argumentation skills. Entertainment
Computing, 35, 100369.
Nurhayati, E., Andayani, Y., & Hakim, A. (2021). Pengembangan e-modul kimia
berbasis STEM dengan pendekatan etnosains. Chemistry Education Practice,
4(2), 106–112. https://doi.org/10.29303/cep.v4i2.2768
Okamoto, K. (2006). Fundamentals of optical waveguides. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-525096-2.X5000-4
Oktavia, Z., & Ridlo, S. (2020). Critical thinking skills were reviewed from
primary school students' communication skills in STEM-based project-based
learning model. Journal of Primary Education, 9(3), 311–320.
https://doi.org/10.15294/jpe.v9i3.27573
Oktavianti, E., Handayanto, S. K., Wartono, & Saniso, E. (2018). Students’
library.uns.ac.id digilib.uns.ac.id
254

scientific explanation in blended physics learning with e-scaffolding. Jurnal

Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(2), 181–186.
https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i2.14232
Palupi, B. S., Subiyantoro, S., Rukayah, & Triyanto. (2020). The effectiveness of
Guided Inquiry Learning (GIL) and Problem-Based Learning (PBL) for
explanatory writing skill. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 713–
730. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13146a
Papathanassoglou, D. A., & Vohnsen, B. (2003). Direct visualization of
evanescent optical waves. American Journal of Physics, 71(7), 670–677.
https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1564811
Park, D. Y., Park, M. H., & Bates, A. B. (2018). Exploring young children’s
understanding about the concept of volume through engineering design in a
STEM activity: A case study. International Journal of Science and
Mathematics Education, 16(2), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-
016-9776-0
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Leijen, Ä., & Sarapuu, T. (2012). Improving students’
inquiry skills through reflection and self-regulation scaffolds. Technology,
Instruction, Cognition & Learning, 9(1/2), 81–95.
Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (2007). An Introduction to educational design research.
Plomp, T. (2013). Educational design research: An introduction. Educational
design research, 11-50.
Podolefsky, N. S., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2006). Use of analogy in learning
physics: The role of representations. Physical Review Special Topics -
Physics Education Research, 2(2), 1–10.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.2.020101
Price, A. M., Perkins, K. K., Holmes, N. G., & Wieman, C. E. (2018). How and
why do high school teachers use PhET interactive simulations? Physics
Education Research Conference Proceedings, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2018.pr.price
Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2014). What do new views of knowledge and
thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? American
Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.
https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X029001004
Putri, F. M. (2015). Pengaruh penerapan kombinasi metode inkuiri dan reciprocal
teaching terhadap capaian pemahaman konsep siswa. Jurnal Edusains, 7(1),
19–26.
Rahmah, N. (2021). Model pencampuran konsep fisika dan penalaran matematika
dalam memecahkan masalah fisika. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika,
12(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v12i1.7929
Rao, D. B. (2003). Scientific attitude. New Delhi: Discovery Publishing House.
Rapanta, C., & Christodoulou, A. (2022). Walton's types of argumentation
dialogues as classroom discourse sequences. Learning, Culture and Social
Interaction, 36, 100352.
Raynold, J. . (1997). Introduction to applied and environmental geophysics. New
Jersy: John Willey and Son Ltd.
Rehalat, A. (2016). Model pembelajaran pemrosesan informasi. Jurnal
library.uns.ac.id digilib.uns.ac.id
255

Pendidikan Ilmu Sosial, 23(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpis.v23i2.1625

Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). Instructional design theories and models: A new
paradigm of instructional theory. In Instructional-Design Theories and
Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory (Vol. 2, Issue January
1999). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410603784
Ridha, M. R., Zuhdi, M., & Ayub, S. (2022). Pengembangan perangkat
pembelajaran PjBL berbasis STEM dalam meningkatkan kreativitas fisika
peserta didik. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 7(1), 223–228.
https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v7i1.447
Riduwan, M. B. A. (2016). Skala pengukuran variabel-variabel
penelitian.Bandung: Alfabeta.
Robertson, A. D., Goodhew, L. M., Scherr, R. E., & Heron, P. R. L. (2021).
University student conceptual resources for understanding forces. Physical
Review Physics Education Research, 17(1), 10121.
Sagala, R., Umam, R., Thahir, A., Saregar, A., & Wardani, I. (2019). The
effectiveness of STEM-based on gender differences: The impact of physics
concept understanding. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(3),
753–761. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.3.753
Santrock, J. W. (2018). Educational psychology: Theory and application to fitness
and performance. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Saputra, M. E. A., & Mujib, M. (2018). Efektivitas model flipped classroom
menggunakan video pembelajaran matematika terhadap pemahaman konsep.
Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, 1(2), 173–179.
Sasmita, P. R., & Hartoyo, Z. (2020). Pengaruh pendekatan pembelajaran STEM
project-based learning terhadap pemahaman konsep siswa. Silampari Jurnal
Pendidikan Fisika, 2(2), 136-148.
Scanlon, E., Anastopoulou, S., Kerawalla, L., & Mulholland, P. (2011). How
technology resources can be used to represent personal inquiry and support
students’ understanding of it across contexts. Journal of Computer Assisted
Learning, 27(6), 516–529. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00414.x
Senior, J. (2009). Optical fiber communications principles and practice third
edition. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
Serway, R. A., & Jewett, J. W. (2008). Physics for scientists and engineers with
modern physics. United States of America: Thomson Learning, Inc.
Setiawan, Y. E., & Mustangin, M. (2020). Kepraktisan model pembelajaran
IDEAL (Issue, Discussion, Establish, and Apply) dalam pembelajaran
matematika. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 9(3),
776. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v9i3.2917
Sharma, R. C., & Shukla, C. S. (2006). Modern science teaching. New Delhi:
Dhanpat Rai.
Simarmata, J., Simanihuruk, L., Ramadhani, R., Safitri, M., Wahyuni, D., &
Iskandar, A. (2020). Pembelajaran STEM berbasis HOTS dan
penerapannya. Medan: Yayasan Kita Menulis.
Siswanto, J. (2018). Keefektifan pembelajaran fisika dengan pendekatan STEM
untuk meningkatkan kreativitas mahasiswa. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran
library.uns.ac.id digilib.uns.ac.id
256

Fisika, 9(2), 133–137. https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v9i2.3183

Sudjana. (2005). Metode statistika edisi ke-6. Bandung: Tarsito.
Suhandi, A., Sinaga, P., Kaniawati, I., & Suhendi, E. (2008). Efektivitas
penggunaan media simulasi virtual pada pendekatan pembelajaran
konseptual interaktif dalam meningkatkan pemahaman konsep dan
meminimalkan miskonsepsi. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu
Pengetahuan Alam, 12(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v12i1.317
Suhendar, U., & Ekayanti, A. (2018). Problem based learning sebagai upaya
peningkatan pemahaman konsep mahasiswa. Jurnal Dimensi Pendidikan
Dan Pembelajaran, 6(1), 15-19.
Sujarwanto, E. (2019). Pemahaman konsep dan kemampuan penyelesaian
masalah dalam pembelajaran fisika. Diffraction, 1(1), 22–33.
Suparno, P. (2013). Miskonsepsi & perubahan konsep dalam pendidikan fisika.
Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasarana.
Suprapto, N. (2020). Do we experience misconceptions?: An ontological review
of misconceptions in science. Studies in Philosophy of Science and
Education, 1(2), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.46627/sipose.v1i2.24
Tamara, J., Moore, Micah, S., Stohlmann, Wang, H. H., M, K., Tank, Aran, W.,
Glancy, Gillian, H., & Roehrig. (2014). Implementation and integration of
engineering in K-12 STEM education. In Engineering in pre-college settings:
Synthesizing research, policy, and practices (pp. 35-60). Purdue University
Press.
Tayubi, Y. R. (2005). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi pada Konsep-Konsep Fisika
Menggunakan Certainty of Response Index (CRI). Jurnal UPI, 24(3), 4–9.
Tekeng, N. Y. (2015). Using self-explanation strategy to improve students’
understanding of the to be learned material. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Islam,
2(2), 173–184.
Telford, W. M. (1990). Applied geophysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Tofel-Grehl, C., Feldon, D. F., & Callahan, C. M. (2018). Impacts of learning
standards and testing on gifted learners in STEM schools: A multilevel
analytic induction. Roeper Review, 40(2), 130–138.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2018.1434714
Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Trianto, I. B., & Ibnu, B. (2014). Mendesain model pembelajaran inovatif,
progresif, dan kontekstual. Medan: Prenadamedia Group.
Trisnawati, E. (2019). Analisis miskonsepsi pada konsep dasar IPA menggunakan
Certainty of Response Index (CRI). Jurnal Dialektika Jurusan PGSD, 9(2),
210–228.
Tuminaro, J., Tuminaro, J., Redish, E. F., & Redish, E. F. (2005). Students’ use of
mathematics in the context of physics problem solving: A cognitive model.
Framework, 12(2),1–25.
Vörös, Z., & Johnsen, R. (2008). A simple demonstration of frustrated total
internal reflection. American Journal of Physics, 76(8), 746–749.
https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2904473
library.uns.ac.id digilib.uns.ac.id
257

Vygotsky, L. S. (2017). Educational psychology (Vol. 4, Issue 1). St. Lucie Press.
Walding, R., Rapkins, G., & Rossiter, G. (2004). New century senior physics:
Concepts in context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Walsh, L. N., Howard, R. G., & Bowe, B. (2007). Phenomenographic study of
students’ problem-solving approaches in physics. Physical Review Special
Topics - Physics Education Research, 3(2), 1–12.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020108
Wenno, I. H., Esomar, K., & Sopacua, V. (2016). Analisis kesulitan belajar dan
pencapaian hasil belajar siswa melalui strategi pembelajaran inkuiri. Jurnal
Cakrawala Pendidikan, 35(3), 378–385.
Widoyoko, E. P. (2012). Teknik penyusunan ınstrumen penelitian. Yogyakarta:
Pustaka Pelajar.
Wieman, C. E., Adams, W. K., Loeblein, P., & Perkins, K. K. (2010). Teaching
physics using PhET simulations. The Physics Teacher, 48(4), 225–227.
Wieman, C. E., Adams, W. K., & Perkins, K. K. (2008). Physics. PhET:
Simulations that enhance learning. Science, 322(5902), 682–683.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1161948
Winn, W. (1995). Instructional design and situated learning : Paradox or
partnership ? Instructional Design Fundamentals: A Reconsideration, 33(3),
159–169.
Wu, H. (1999). Basic skills versus conceptual understanding: A bogus dichotomy
in mathematics education. American Educator, 23(3), 14-19.
Yang, H. T., & Wang, K. H. (2014). A teaching model for scaffolding 4th grade
students’ scientific explanation writing. Research in Science Education,
44(4), 531–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9392-8
Yeh, K. H., & She, H. C. (2010). Online synchronous scientific argumentation
learning: Nurturing students’ argumentation ability and conceptual change in
science context. Computers and Education, 55(2), 586–602.
Yoanita, P. & I. A. (2015). Pengembangan e-diagnostic test untuk identifikasi
tingkat pemahaman konsep siswa SMP pada tema optik dan penglihatan.
Unnes Science Education Journal, 4(1), 815–822.
You, Y., Wang, X., Wang, S., Pan, Y., & Zhou, J. (2008). A new method to
demonstrate frustrated total internal reflection in the visible band. American
Journal of Physics, 76(3), 224–228. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2825389
Yulia, R. (2021). STEM dan model-model pembelajaran. Diakses pada tanggal 3
Oktober 2022, dari http://lpmpaceh.kemdikbud.go.id/.
Zanella, F. P., Magalhães, D. V., Oliveira, M. M., Bianchi, R. F., Misoguti, L., &
Mendonça, C. R. (2003). Frustrated total internal reflection: A simple
application and demonstration. American Journal of Physics, 71(5), 494–
496. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1523075
Zulaiha, F., & Kusuma, D. (2020). Pengembangan modul berbasis STEM untuk
siswa SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 6(2), 246–255.
https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v6i2.2182
Zulkarnain, I., & Budiman, H. (2019). Pengaruh Pemahaman Konsep Terhadap
Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Research and Development
Journal of Education, 6(1), 18-27.
library.uns.ac.id digilib.uns.ac.id
258