First Page PDF

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

CHAPTER IV

G E O M E T R I C A L T H E O R Y OF
OPTICAL IMAGING

4.1 T H E C H A R A C T E R I S T I C F U N C T I O N S OF H A M I L T O N

I N § 3.1 it was shown that, within the approximations of geometrical optics, the field
may be characterized by a single scalar function Sf(r). Since S?(r) satisfies the eikonal
equation ( 1 5 ) in § 3.1, this function is fully specified by the refractive index function
n(r) alone, together with the appropriate boundary conditions.
Instead of the function £f(r) closely related functions known as characteristic
functions of the medium are often used. They were introduced into optics by W . R .
H A M I L T O N , in a series of classical papers.* Although on account of algebraic com-
plexity it is impossible to determine the characteristic functions explicitly for all but
the simplest media, HAMILTON'S methods nevertheless form a very powerful tool for
systematic analytical investigations of the general properties of optical systems.
In discussing the properties of these functions and their applications, an isotropic
but generally heterogeneous medium will be assumed.

4.1.1 The point characteristic


Let (x0, y0, z0) and (xli yv % ) be respectively the coordinates of two points P 0 and Px
each referred to a different set of mutually parallel, rectangular axesf (Fig. 4 . 1 ) . I f
the two points are imagined to be joined b y all possible curves, there will, in general,
be some amongst them, the optical rays, which satisfy FERMAT'S principle. Assume
for the present that not more than one ray joins any two arbitrary points. The
characteristic function V, or the point characteristic, is then defined as the optical
length [Ρ0Ρχ] of the ray between the two points, considered as a function of their co-
ordinates,

nds. (1)

I t is important to note that this function is defined by the medium.

* Sir W . R . H A M I L T O N , Trans. Roy. Irish Acad., 1 5 (1828), 69; ibid., 1 6 (1830), 1; ibid., 1 6
(1831), 93; ibid., 1 7 (1837), 1. Reprinted in The Mathematical Papers of Sir W. R. Hamilton,
Vol. I (Geometrical Optics), edited by A . W . C O N W A Y and J. L . S Y N G E (Cambridge University
Press, 1931).
Many years later B R U N S independently considered similar functions which he called eikonals.
( H . B R U N S , Abh. Kgl. Sachs. Ges. Wiss., math-phys. Kl., 2 1 (1895), 323.) As already mentioned on
p. 112, this term has come to be used in a wider sense. The characteristic functions of HAMILTON
are themselves often referred to as eikonals.
A useful introduction to HAMILTON'S methods is a monograph by J. L . SYNGE, Geometrical
Optics (Cambridge University Press, 1937). The relationship between the work of H A M I L T O N and
B R U N S was discussed by F . K L E I N in Z. Math. Phys., 46 (1901), 376, and Ges. Math. Abh., 2 (1922),
603, C. CARATHÉODORY, Geometrische Optik (Berlin, Springer, 1937), p. 4, and in a polemic between
M. HERZBERGER and J. L . S Y N G E , J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 2 7 (1937), 75, 133, 138.
t The use of two reference systems has some advantages, since P0 and Px are often situated in
different regions, namely, the object- and image-spaces of an optical system.
PO 6th Ed. - F 133

You might also like