Optimizing Dimension of Heat Sinks Plate db461907

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

ISSN 1859-1531 - THE UNIVERSITY OF DANANG, JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, NO. 12(133).

2018 19

OPTIMIZING DIMENSION OF HEAT SINK’S PLATE FIN WITH THE EFFECT


OF WIND VELOCITY IN SITE ROUTER TECOMMUNICATION SYSTEM
Viet Dang-Thai, Thong Dinh-Sy
Hanoi University of Science and Technology; [email protected], [email protected]

Abstract - Nowadays, heat dissipation for electronic chips, T: The absolute temperature of the object (K).
microprocessors in electrical and electronic equipment, especially
in Site Router telecommunication equipment when operating at ΔT = T1-T2: The difference in wall thickness (K).
high intensity is an urgent process to increase life expectancy,
Tw: Average temperature of the object (K,0C).
productivity and performance. Many telecom providers such as
Huawei, Ericsson, Cisco etc have offered solutions for liquid Tf: Average temperature of the gas or liquid (K,0C).
cooling, cold air, heat pipes. However, the complexity, the cost and
the effect are not high. Furthermore, there is shortage in optimal T0=291,15: Standard temperature of air (K).
parameters of design and operation [1-5]. Derived from the above T0=273+55: Absolute temperature environment (K).
fact, the author has calculated and modeled a Site Router
equipment using extruded blast heat exchanger with a large heat t: Thickness of fin.
exchanger structure which withstands pressure when falling, tb: Thickness of base.
combining airflow from fans to speed up the dissipation of heat. In
this paper, the author presents the optimal calculation and control W: Width of heatsink.
process of the size of the heat sink and the contact plate under the
influence of actual operation conditions at the specified velocity of 2. Introduction
the air flow from which the model is built directly to determine the
number and the size of the heat sink’s plate fins. Today's thermal technology evolves from material to
heat dissipation for liquid, nitrogen, gas or heatpipe
Key words - Airflow; cooling process; heat dissipation; optimal
control; SiteRouter equipment. applications such as "Laser-cooling Brings Large Object
Near Absolute Zero" by Hänsch and Schawlow [7].
1. Nomanclature The variety of solutions offers great efficiency for
A: Surface area in m2. devices that require large amounts of heat dissipation.
Ac: Cross-sectional area in m2. However, the complex structure and the need for external
power sources such as heat pumps have increased costs and
Af = H.W: Total frontal area of heatsink. are difficult to implement for limited-sized devices such as
Ap: Fin profile area. SiteRouter. One of the studies: "Design and Optimization
α: The convective heat transfer coefficient depends on of Horizontally-Finished Plate HeatSink for High Power
a number of parameters determined by experiment LED street lamps" by Xiaobing Luo and Wei Xiong [6]
(W/m2.K). launched in 2009 has reduced the complexity of liquid-
b: Fin spacing in m. liquid heat sinks as well as the use of extruded extruded
heatsinks to optimize heat dissipation.The study has
C=120: Sutherland's constant for air. created the premise for the placement of heatsinks in
F: surface area of heat exchanger (m2). telecommunication equipment with optimal size compact.
H: Fin height in m. However, the new study stops at passive heat dissipation
k= 209: Thermal conductivity of Al6063-T5 (W/m.K). through radiation and convection without impact from
wind flow.
θb: Temperature excess = Tb- T0(K,0C).
Based on the research on extruded bladed heat
λ: Thermal conductivity of the material (W/m.K). exchanger, the team combined the airflow through the
L: Fin length in m. layout solution of the blower in the SiteRouter, calculating
μ: Dynamic viscosity at input temperature T0. the fin height adjustment and the distance between the fins.
heat dissipation to reduce the heat at specified values of
μ0= 18,27x10-6 Viscosity reference at standard
wind speed, increase the ability to dissipate heat to the
temperature T0.
environment. The obtained results are achieved through
W −t using NLP solve optimization function on Maple for the
N= +1
b+t : Number of fins. heat dissipation of Site Router’s Mathematic model [8].
Qx: X- axis heat transfer for 1 second (W). 3. Method
Q: Heat dissipates in a second of the object (W). SiteRouter equipment is modeled by using built-in fan
qx: The density of the heat transfer current in the housings on the air flow bushes directly into the extruded-
direction x (W/m2). fins heatsink. At fixed velocities of 1 m/s, 5 m/s the authors
Rɵ: Thermal resistance (K/W). calculate the thickness of profiles of the fins as well as the
distance between the adjacent fins from which the number
Rsink: Thermal resistance of heatsink. of heat sink flutes is matched for the highest heat
Rfin: Thermal resistance of each fin. dissipation effect
20 Viet Dang-Thai, Thong Dinh-Sy
3.1. Thermal conductivity 3.2. Convection
Thermal conductivity occurs due to the difference in
temperature between regions in a solid or between two
solid objects in contact. General heat conduction [4, 5] is:
T Q T
Q x = − F ( W ) → qx = x = − ( W / m2 ) (1)
x F x
in case of flat wall (application of heat dissipation Figure 3. Convection process
calculation)
T T 
Q = F = (W) → R = (K/ W, 0 C/ W) (2)
 R F
with λ: Thermal conductivity of the material (W/m.K).
Diamonds, silver and copper have very good thermal
conductivity (see table 1). However, most manufacturers Figure 4. Thermodynamic model
use aluminum as their primary material. The main reason Convection is the process of heat exchange that occurs
is that aluminum is available, cheap and easy to make. when a surface of a solid comes into the contact with a
Besides, another important factor affecting the heat liquid or gaseous environment at different temperatures.
dissipation quality is the ability to radiate (Copper is able To calculate the heat in the convection process we use
to emit less heat than aluminum). the Newton formula as follows:
In this paper, the main purpose is to analyze geometric Tw − T f
parameters of heatsinks and based on the thermal Q =  F (Tw − T f ) = ( W)
conductivity and manufacturing capability. The author R (3)
1
uses the Al 6063-T5 aluminum for the heatsink of → R =
(K/ W, 0 C/ W)
SiteRouter equipment. F
3.3. Influence of geometric parameters of heat
dissipation to heat dissipation

Figure 1. Conduct heat from high temperature to low temperature

Figure 5. Structure of Heatsinks


The energy equation for the heat exchanger has the
effect of the external air flow of the heat sink [3]:

Q b Fd Vf
S gen
= 2
+ (4)
T0 T0

Figure 2. Heat conduction through flat wall and equivalent heat While  b
= Q.Rsink (5)
Table 1. Table of thermal conductivity of 2

some heat dissipation materials


From (4) and (5):

QR FV (6)
= +
sink d f

S gen 2

T 0 T 0

Thermal resistance of the heatsink:

=
1
+
t b
(7)
R sink
) + h(N − 1) bL
(N/ R fin
kLW

Thermal resistance of each fin:


1
R fin
= 8)
hPk A c
tanh(mH)
ISSN 1859-1531 - THE UNIVERSITY OF DANANG, JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, NO. 12(133).2018 21

hP R sink = R sink (L, H, t b , W, b, t, … ) = R sink (x1 , x2 , x3 , … )


With: m= (9)
→ min
k A c

Because the size and working space of the device is


Force acting on the heatsink surface under the effect of air limited, the parameters L, H, W are fixed. Therefore, the
flow: optimal performance of heat dissipation based on
F optimizing the remaining parameters of the heatsink
= f N (2 HL + bL) + K (HW) + K (HW) (10)
d

2 c e includes: b, t, tb.
(1 2) 
app

V ch

Apply with practical parameters for experiment:


Free flow velocity: =
t
(1 + ) (11) Q = 25W; L=60.10−3m; W = 60.10−3 m; H=25.10−3m;
V ch V f
b 𝑏
t b = 2.10−3 m with condition: ≥ 0.28 to remove the
𝐻
For laminar flow: radiation directly from the surface of the heatsinks to the
12 opposite heatsinks surface.
 
2  Case 1: At wind speed of 1 m/s
f app R eD = 
3.44 2
 + f R eD (12) The NLP Solve command solves a nonlinear
h  * 
h  program (NLP), which involves computing the
 L  minimum (or maximum) of an objective function, possibly
subject to constraints [8]. Therefore, using the NLP solve
* L optimization function on Maple, we obtain the optimal
with: L = (13)
solution b, t for heat dissipation:
DR h eD
h

b b
fReDh = 24 − 32.527() + 46.721( ) 2 (14) Solve = [2.26046585938925793,  b=0.00545000000000002,
H H t=0,000779266948589301]
b 3 b 4 b
−40.829( ) + 22.954( ) − 6.089( ) 5
H H H
2
2 Nt
) and K e = (1 − (1− ) )
N .t 2
Kc = 0.42(1 − (1− ) (15)
W W
The equation of heat transfer coefficient:
−1/3
 −3
  
−3

  Reb* Pr 
Nub =   +  0.664 Reb .Pr
* 1/3
1+
3.65  
  *  
 
2 Re
 b  

(16)
b Figure 6. The graph shows the relationship between Rsink heat
Re b * = Re b   (17)
L dissipation with fin’s thickness t at wind speed of 1 m/s.

kf .Nub The following optimal number of heat sink’s fin


h= (18) optimizes t parameters:
b
−3
W −t 60.10 − 0, 000779
Dh .Vch N= +1 = = 10 ( fins ) (22)
Reynolds factor: R eDh = ; Dh = 2.b . b+t
−3
5, 45.10 + 0, 000779

Use Ansys IcePack to simulate 3 cases with other fin’s
2.b.Vch
Therefore: R eD = (19) number:
 h

a) N= 15, ambient temperature 550C, the highest heat


Kinematic viscosity: gain on the heat sink 91,7862 0C.
 (T 0 + C )  T0 
3/ 2

 = ; = 0 .  (20)
 T0 + C T0 

4. Parameters optimized with empirical model


Based on the energy equation Entropy (4), we can
optimize any of the parameters for the size of the heat sink:

 S gen
=0 (21)
x
Ṡgen = Ṡgen (L, H, t b , W, b, t … ) = Ṡgen (x1 , x2 , x3 , … )
→ min
22 Viet Dang-Thai, Thong Dinh-Sy
0
b) N=8, ambient temperature 55 C, the highest heat The following optimal number of heat sink’s fin
gain on the heat sink 93,7176 0C. optimizes t parameters:
−3
W −t 60.10 − 0, 00137
N= +1 = −3
= 8( fins )
b+t 7.10 + 0, 00137
Number of fins is a positive integer, so in the low
velocity range from 1 ÷ 10 m/s the number of fins changing
10 ÷ 8 fins does not clearly show the change of temperature
when the velocity adjustment amplitude is small.
Therefore, based on the calculation of the thickness of
the fin, we compare the temperature when the fins have
different thicknesses.
a) t= 0.8 mm, ambient temperature 550C, the highest
c) Optimized parameters N=10, ambient temperature heat gain on the heatsink 71,60410C.
55 0C, the highest heat gain on the heat sink 90,1244 0C.

b) t= 2,5 mm, ambient temperature 550C, the highest


heat gain on the heatsink 72,09220C.
Figure 7. The comparison about the highest heat gain between
the different N of heatsink at ambient temperature 550C
Combining the calculated resuslt of eq. (22) with the
experiment simulation, at the N=10 at the fixed ambiend
temperature 55oC, the best highest gain on the heat sink is
90,1244oC. The obtained result is compared with the
number of fin N=15 (is larger than 10) and N=8 (is smaller
than 10). Thus, the optimized parameter N is 10 which is
really suitable with the theory calculation in (22).
Case 2: At wind speed of 5 m/s:
Using the NLP solve optimization function on Maple
we obtain the optimal solution b, t for the heat dissipation:

c) Optimized parameters t = 1 mm, ambient temperature


Solve = [1.36539969526120397,  b=0.00700000000000009, 550C, the highest heat gain on the heatsink 70,1067 0C.
t=0,00137701437586191]

Figure 8. The graph shows the relationship between Rsink heat


Figure 9. The comparison about the highest heat gain between
dissipation with fin’s thickness t at wind speed of 5 m/s
the different fin’s thicknesses at ambient temperature 550C
ISSN 1859-1531 - THE UNIVERSITY OF DANANG, JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, NO. 12(133).2018 23
The results show the relationship between the Rsink heat dissipation with wing thickness t in Figures 7
geometric parameters of the extruded bladed heatsinks and and 8 with the obtained optimized parameters.
the effect of magnetic force from the wind, thus providing
the most suitable and effective thermal dissipation for Site Acknowledgments
Router equipment at the certain velocity values of the wind. This research was funded by the Vietnam National
Obtained achievements should extend the radiated energy Foundation for Science and Technology Development
of the heatsink when the wind velocity condition is (NAFOSTED) under the project number 107.03-2013.15.
constant. The work finds out optimal parameters for the
profile, heat sink and fan speed control that help the device REFERENCES
to achieve the highest thermal dissipation efficiency.
[1] A. Bejian, Entropy Generation Through Heat and Fluid Flow, New
York, Wiley, 1982.
5. Conclusion
[2] W.M. Kays and A.L.London, Compact Heat Exchangers, New
Derived from the obtained results of module Al 6063- York, McGraw-Hill,1984.
T5 heatsink of the Site Router, the author has calculated [3] A. Bejian, Entropy Generation Minimization, Boca Raton, FL, CRC
and modeled Site Router equipment using extruded blast Press, 1996.
heat exchanger with a large heat exchanger structure which [4] PGS. TS. Võ Chí Chính, “Kỹ Thuật Nhiệt”, Scientific and Technical
Publishing Hà Nội, 2006.
withstands pressure when falling, combining the airflow
[5] PGS. TS. Nguyễn Bốn, “Nhiệt Kỹ Thuật”, Scientific and Technical
from the fans to speed up the dissipation of heat. In this Publishing Hà Nội, 2003.
paper, the author discusses optimal process of size of the [6] Xiaobing Luo and Wei Xiong, “Design and Optimization of
heat sinks and the contact plate is calculated under the Horizontally- located Plate Fin Heat Sink for High Power LED street
influence of actual operating conditions at the specified Lamps”, IEEE, China, (2009).
velocity of the air flow from which the model is built [7] Ir. C. J. M. Lasance, “Heat transfer Theory applied to Thermal
directly to determine the number and the size of plate fin Design and Cooling of Electronics Workshop”, Philips Research,
(2003).
heatsinks. Using the NLP solve optimization function on [8] I. Castillo, T. Lee and J. D. Pinter, “Integrated Software Tools for
Maple, we obtain the optimal solution b, t for heat the OR/MS Classroom”, Algorithmic Operations Research, Vol.3
dissipation. Finally, the author has completely defined (2008) 82–91.
experimental relationship of characteristic lines between

(The Board of Editors received the paper on 09/7/2018, its review was completed on 04/9/2018)

You might also like