Skills For Drug Discovery Position Statement
Skills For Drug Discovery Position Statement
Skills For Drug Discovery Position Statement
Skills for
Drug Discovery
A Biochemical Society position statement | February 2014
We identify some critical areas for instruction and training that will equip a new
generation of biochemistry graduates to have a real impact on drug research and
development and therefore on human health.
Introduction
Modern drug design and development is a complex process that brings together numerous
chemical, biological and clinical disciplines. This includes a wide range of biomolecular
science and as such there are many roles suited to scientists whose background, training
and expertise lies in biochemistry. These range from early involvement in the identification
and validation of potential molecular targets for new drug projects, to key roles in assay
design, troubleshooting and implementation throughout the screening and optimization
stages of both traditional small molecules and biopharmaceutical products. In the last case,
expertise in molecular immunology, genetic manipulation, protein chemistry and synthetic
biology have been crucial and provided new directions for drug discovery. At a later stage
in new drug research, biochemical assays are needed to evaluate disease models and to
drive biomarker analysis in translational medicine and clinical research.
Throughout the discovery process, biochemical skills are required for monitoring routes of
drug metabolism, for pharmacokinetic analysis and safety testing. At a more biophysical
level, biochemists may contribute significantly to computational chemistry and structural
analysis, such as crystallography or other methods employed to demonstrate drug-binding
modes and to predict potential modifications and improvements of lead compounds.
With the current growth in bioinformatics, proteomics and genomics, there is even more
scope for researchers with biochemical expertise, including emergent areas of carbohydrate
diversity and glycomics or in lipidomics and lipid biology. New drug opportunities
provided by various nucleic acid-based disease interventions, including gene replacement,
use of micro RNA gene silencing or exploitation of other novel methods for controlling
gene expression may draw more biochemistry graduates into pharmaceutical and drug
discovery careers.
Biochemical basics
These should be central to all undergraduate courses in biochemistry. However, as the field
grows new discoveries may tend to displace the traditional topics that were taught. This
can leave newer generations of students struggling with some basic concepts. We must
never lose sight of the fundamental topics that underpin understanding of more complex
biological process.
Analytical skills
Accurate identification and precise measurements of biochemical entities supports many
aspects of the life sciences, none more so than in drug design. Understanding of key
principles of analytical science allows new assays to be developed and refined, many of
which make use of biochemical systems (e.g. ELISA and its newer homogenous formats) as
well as hardware-centred techniques such as HPLC, LC-MS, and robotic systems for high-
throughput screening or bioimaging assay formats.
The last of these, imaging and high-throughput microscopy, is an area of growth and rapid
change that offers novel approaches to drug screening and creates high content assay
formats that the industry is adopting so researchers with specific training in these areas
will be needed. Elsewhere, the shifting emphasis towards the use of biomarkers to inform
personalized healthcare and in translational science will provide more opportunities for
biochemists in the future.
Our graduates should be conversant with data analysis and aware of the importance
of understanding data distribution and the differences and relevance of arithmetic and
geometric means and how to use these calculations appropriately.
There are many underlying elementary principles that are common to these two protein
types and students should appreciate their similarities and differences. We should promote
the most up-to-date techniques for quantifying ligand binding, substrate turnover,
inhibitor characterization or agonist and antagonist responses using non-linear parametric
or non-parametric statistically robust curve fitting as well as traditional linear graphical
representations of data. The nature and impact of rate constants (particularly dissociation
rates) on assay design, the data produced and its interpretation should all be represented in
the core knowledge set.
Signalling
Signalling events lie at the heart of physiological control in health and disease, influencing
biology from the cellular to the organismal level and directing wholesale changes in
cellular biochemistry. Frequently, faults or imbalances in a signalling process drive disease
pathology. Manipulation of such pathways has resulted in many examples of successful
drug development, for example by targeting G-protein-coupled receptors, ion channels
or protein kinases and has benefited from the molecular level of analysis that biochemists
have contributed. A sound knowledge of the messengers and sometimes complex
pathways and networks involved will continue to be one of the most important topics for
young scientists to grasp as they move into careers in medical and drug research.
Toxicology
Toxicity or other safety issues are a leading cause of attrition at all stages of the drug
discovery process, but can sometimes be predicted using biochemical toxicology tests,
leading to the selection of better drug candidates. At the early stages of discovery, the
cytotoxicity of potential therapeutics can be assessed against a range of cell types,
including hepatocyte toxicity and phopsholipidosis potential or monitoring interactions
with hERG channels. Biochemical skills are also important when examining drug–drug
interactions.
Systems biology
Most of the diseases for which new treatments are now sought are multi-factorial
and medication is often with drug combinations. The underlying cellular systems of
signalling and metabolism are networks with multiple inputs and outputs, as well as
many interconnected internal routes. The net behaviour of these systems is too complex
to be understood intuitively, arising as it does from non-linear interactions between
multiple components. Systems biology applies mathematical analysis and computational
modelling to determine the responses to alterations in the activities of various components,
offering improved potential to identify the most effective molecular targets. Models can
also function to integrate diverse experimental information, including high-throughput
data, enzyme kinetics, inhibition constants and pharmacokinetic data, as well as cell-
based assays, animal experimentation and biomarker measurements. This mathematical
modelling is based on prior identification of the components and their interactions
and needs to be informed by sound biochemical and biophysical principles, as well as
quantitative measurements. It may also need to take into account the spatio-temporal
concentrations and compartmentalization of the relevant components. Simply measuring
the concentration of individual analytes is unlikely to provide useful information if the
biochemical pathways and networks are not adequately understood. Systems biology
requires a team approach where skills of practical and theoretical biochemistry combine
in creating and testing of models. New researchers are needed who understand these
opportunities and are able to apply techniques and principles of pathways analysis and
systems biology to decide which new targets might be given priority.
Where experimentally derived 3D models are not available, molecular modelling techniques
may be used to generate them from knowledge of homologous proteins. Experimental and
modelled protein structures are now routinely used alongside computational docking in
virtual screening of chemical libraries to accelerate the search for new drug molecules.
Practices in outsourcing
The use of external collaborations and contract research organizations has grown within
the industry; in some cases to the extent that models similar to many start-up companies
where all research activities are outsourced now operate within major pharmaceutical firms.
Many biochemists entering the industry will need to be familiar with these business models,
either because they will seek employment within companies offering services to industry or
they will be working with groups that seek to outsource some of their own studies.
Concluding remarks
Throughout the drug discovery process; from building our understanding of the cellular
processes that drive disease, through initial identification of novel molecular targets and
chemical entities with the ability to modulate their activity, to monitoring pathological
changes in disease and during drug treatment, biochemistry has a central role to play
alongside other important disciplines.
Rising costs in drug discovery, coupled with high attrition rates throughout the pipeline,
particularly during clinical trials, have been a major cause for concern within the drug
industry in recent years. Skilful application of traditional and modern techniques in
biochemistry and molecular biosciences have the capacity to play a pivotal role in reducing
attrition by providing better target selection, more suitable chemical choices and improving
success in translational research and clinical development.
This will require excellent knowledge transfer between scientists with industrial experience
and young researchers, such that lessons that we have already learned are passed on and
the science of drug discovery can develop and grow to the benefit of patients.
Practices and structures within the industry are in a constant state of flux. Although we may
promote specific business aspects, our graduates need to appreciate they are not universal,
however, the underlying principles can be widely applied. Most important is that we furnish
graduates with a sound understanding of the basic scientific principles so that they have a
secure platform upon which individual R&D organizations or academic units can themselves
add specific training.
It is imperative that techniques taught in drug discovery are relevant to the practices most
widespread in commercial drug discovery so that graduates have good employability. The
needs of the pharmaceutical industry, large pharma, smaller R&D companies, the biotech
sector, start-up companies and contract research organizations must be met by the training
of young scientists and should enable graduates to function in all of these environments.
However, if we are to equip graduates now to enter the industry in 4–7 years’ time, they also
need to have an appreciation of where new therapies will come from. This might include
gene therapy, tissue repair and regeneration and include stem cell technology and novel
forms of drug delivery, as well as the traditional approaches. Graduates need to have their
horizons broadened beyond what the industry currently does.
Finally, it is crucial that the pharmaceutical industry, in all of its guises, endorse and embrace
these initiatives and recognize their value. It is, therefore vital that our education practices
should be forward thinking and carefully tailored to the emerging requirements of a very
dynamic industry.
This document was created in February 2014 and will be reviewed regularly.
We achieve our mission though our publications and journals, scientific meetings,
educational activities, policy work, awards, and grants to scientists and students.
Education Team
Tel: +44 (0)20 7685 2454
Email: [email protected]
Policy Team
Tel: +44 (0)20 7685 2453
Email: [email protected]
General Enquiries
Tel: +44 (0)20 7685 2400
Email: [email protected]
www.biochemistry.org
@BiochemSoc
Biochemical Society