Effect of Quarry Dust on Compaction

Characteristics of Clay

Malaya Chetia1(&), Manash P. Baruah1, and Asuri Sridharan2

1
Assam Engineering College, Guwahati, Assam, India
[email protected], [email protected]
2
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian National Science Academy, Indian
Institute of Science Bangalore, Bangalore, India
[email protected]

Abstract. Urbanization and industrialization has lead to scarcity of land with

good bearing capacities thus forcing the construction over sites deemed
unsuitable for such activities. To improve the geotechnical properties of soil of
such sites soil stabilization methods are adopted. Use of graded aggregates as
additives to such soil followed by compaction is an old technique of mechanical
soil stabilization increases the support quality of soil and also provides material
economy. Sand is used for the purpose but is getting scares day by day due to its
large field of application. Rock quarry dust is a solid waste product produced in
large scale during crushing operations of stones and rocks to obtain aggregates.
Similarity in mineral composition and inertness in structure has made it possible
to use them as the graded aggregate material and suitable alternative to sand for
geotechnical operations. Also bulk utilization of this waste has become neces-
sary due to geo environmental problems related to its disposal. The objective of
this paper is to investigate the effect of quarry dust addition of different gra-
dations on the compaction behavior of clay of different compressibility. A series
of light compaction tests were carried out on soil mixes prepared with different
quarry dust content with a locally available clayey soil and commercially
available bentonite clay. Variation in the maximum dry density (MDD) and
optimum moisture content (OMC) values has been obtained with increasing
content and use of different gradations of quarry dust in the two clay types. Also
the compaction characteristics are compared to those of clay-sand mixes by
using sand samples having similar gradation to that of quarry dust. An effort has
also been made to compare the MDD-OMC relationship of soil mixes of present
study to that of naturally occurring soil found in literature.

1 Introduction

Addition of graded aggregate materials to soil followed by compaction has always been
one of the usual methods of mechanical stabilization of weak soil deposits. This
common practice lends desirable attributes to the soil, such as increased strength,
decreased plasticity and also provides material economy and improves support capa-
bility of soil. This purpose is well served by naturally available sand for decades. But
since the use of sand is not only limited to geotechnical applications but also in
construction industry, so efforts have been made to find suitable substitute for it.

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

D.N. Singh and A. Galaa (eds.), Contemporary Issues in
Geoenvironmental Engineering, Sustainable Civil Infrastructures,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-61612-4_7
 Effect of Quarry Dust on Compaction Characteristics of Clay 79

Researchers have come out with the idea of utilization of quarry dust, for partial or full
replacement of sand in soil stabilization and other applications. Quarry dust is the waste
product obtained during crushing operations of stones to obtain aggregates and its
disposal causes many geo environmental problems. The annual production of this
waste is roughly estimated to be around 200 million tons (Soosan et al. (2001)). Due to
comparable mineral composition to that of sand and inertness of coarse grained
structure many researches have been carried out on bulk and effective utilization of this
waste alone or with some admixtures with a motive to stabilize soil. Compaction of soil
is carried out to improve soil densification. Compaction reduces volume of air voids in
the soil that leads to an increase in the shear strength and a decrease in the consoli-
dation and the permeability characteristics of soils. The compaction parameters,
maximum dry density (MDD) and optimum moisture content (OMC) are important in
most of the practical situations needing densification of soil, such as embankments,
highway and railway sub grades and foundation soils. Most of the earlier studies were
concentrated on the effect of dust content on moisture content and dry density of soils.
Soosan et al. (2005) have studied the effect of different percentages of quarry dust on
compaction characteristics of three different soils and observed an increase in MDD
values and decrease in OMC values with increase in dust content in the soil-dust mixes.
The optimum range of quarry dust content in soil was found to be 40–60%. Sridharan
et al. (2006) found similar results of increase in MDD and decrease in OMC with
increase in quarry dust content in his study on variation of shear strength characteristics
of soil on addition of quarry dust. Sarvade and Nayak (2014) in their investigation on
behavior of lithomargic clay stabilized with quarry dust and cement obtained similar
results. Srikanth and Mishra (2016) investigated the effect of sand size on various
sand-bentonite mixes and found MDD increase to be more in the mixes prepared with
medium sand to that of fine sand. A significant volume of research work has been done
by various researchers on the various aspects of the compaction properties of
clay-quarry dust mixes. However comprehensive studies on the effect of gradation on
laboratory maximum density and optimum moisture content of clay-quarry dust
appeared to be very limited and are not compared with that of clay-sand mixes. It seems
important, for practical purposes, to know the effects of grain size of quarry dust on
compaction properties of such mixes for a minimum compacting effort. The objective
of this paper is to investigate the influence of quarry dust content and gradation on the
compaction parameters of clay quarry dust mixtures and to compare them with
clay-sand mixes. Present study indicates a significant effect of grain size and content on
the OMC and MDD of clay-quarry dust mixtures. Gurtug and Sridharan (2004) in their
study, on various types of soils heavily used for constructional works (wL  100%)
and from extensive results from published literatures suggested correlations between
compaction parameters for different compaction levels. It was found that good corre-
lation exists between MDD-OMC for all compaction energy levels with better corre-
lation coefficients and even clear relationship between the compaction parameters was
obtained irrespective of compaction energy and soil type. But no comparison was made
in relation to the MDD-OMC relationships obtained with that proposed for natural
soils. The MDD-OMC relationship obtained in this investigation with quarry dust as an
additive has been compared with those obtained for sand as an additive.
80 M. Chetia et al.

2 Experimental Investigations

Initially two clay samples, locally available clay (denoted by C) and commercially
available bentonite (denoted by B), rock quarry dust (denoted by Q1) and sand (de-
noted by S1) samples are collected. The samples were subjected to different physical
tests by following the guidelines provided by the respective Indian standard (IS) code,
the results of which are presented in Table 1. According to IS soil classification system,
the quarry dust and sand samples were poorly graded (SP) and clay sample was
inorganic clay of medium compressibility (CI), and bentonite was inorganic clay of
high compressibility (CH). Shape and mineralogical characterization of the quarry dust
and sand samples were carried out from the petrographical images (BS 1994) taken
with the help of electron microscope (25x) which indicate that the main mineral present
in the samples was quartz. In addition to quartz significant amount of feldspar is present
in quarry dust sample. Particles of quarry dust sample exhibits sub angular to angular
shape whereas that of sand exhibits sub rounded to rounded shape.

Table 1. Physical properties and classification of the collected samples used in the study
Property Sample
Clay (C) Bentonite (B) Quarry dust (Q1) Sand (S1)
Specific gravity 2.61 2.67 2.71 2.65
Particle size characteristics (%)
Sand (4.75–0.075 mm) 12.5 0.70 79.2 96.90
• Coarse 7sand (4.75–2.00 mm) 2.80 – 10.33 7.05
• Medium sand (2–0.425 mm) 5.45 – 28.67 60.7
• Fine sand (0.425–0.075 mm) 4.25 0.70 40.2 29.15
Fines (< 0.075 mm) 87.5 99.30 13.6 0.60
• Silt (0.075–0.002 mm) 65.67 34.59 13.6 0.60
• Clay (< 0.002 mm) 21.83 64.71 – –
Uniformity coefficient (Cu) – – 8.83 3.23
Coefficient of curvature (Cc) – – 0.91 1.08
Atterberg limits (%)
Liquid limit (wL) 42.4 130.5 – –
Plastic limit (wP) 20.2 48.9 – –
Plasticity index (IP) 22.2 81.6 – –
IS classification CI CH SP SP

In order to achieve the objectives of present study efforts have been taken to prepare
a quarry dust sample QS1 having grain size similar to sand sample S1. Overall two
more samples of sand and five samples of quarry dust were prepared from samples S1
and Q1 respectively. The sand denoted by S2 and quarry dust samples denoted by Q2
and QS2 consist only fine sand fraction (grain size from 425 µ to 75 µ). Sand sample S3
and quarry dust samples Q3 and QS3 consist of medium sand fraction (grain size from
 Effect of Quarry Dust on Compaction Characteristics of Clay 81

Table 2. Designation of soil mixes prepared

C-Q Mixes C-S Mixes C-QS Mixes B-QS1 Mixes B-S1 Mixes
C-Q1 (90:10) C-S1 (90:10) C-QS1 (90:10) B- QS1 (80:15) B-S1 (85:15)
C-Q1 (80:20) C-S1 (80:20) C-QS1 (80:20) B- QS1 (70:30) B-S1 (70:30)
C-Q1 (70:30) C-S1 (70:30) C-QS1 (70:30) B- QS1 (55:45) B-S1(55:45)
C-Q1 (60:40) C-S1 (60:40) C-QS1 (60:40) QS is quarry dust having
C-Q2 (90:10) C-S2 (90:10) C-QS2 (90:10) similar gradation as sand ‘S’
C-Q2 (80:20) C-S2 (80:20) C-QS2 (80:20) QS1 is quarry dust having
C-Q2 (70:30) C-S2 (70:30) C-QS2 (70:30) similar gradation as sand ‘S1’
C-Q2 (60:40) C-S2 (60:40) C-QS2 (60:40)
C-Q3 (90:10) C-S3 (90:10) C-QS3 (90:10)
C-Q3 (80:20) C-S3 (80:20) C-QS3 (80:20)
C-Q3 (70:30) C-S3 (70:30) C-QS3 (70:30)
C-Q3 (60:40) C-S3 (60:40) C-QS3 (60:40)

2 mm to 425 µ), where quarry dust sample QS2 and QS3 are having similar gradation to
that of S2 and S3 samples respectively.
The desired soil mixes for the study were prepared by adding quarry dust and sand
samples to both clays in different proportions of dry weight of the soil mixes in dry

2.0
C-S1 (90:10)
C-S1 (80:20)
1.9 C-S1 (70:30)
C-S1 (60:40)
C
Dry density (g/cm3)

1.8

1.7

1.6

1.5
5 10 15 20 25 30
Moisture content (%)

Fig. 1. Compaction curves for C and C-S1 mixes

82 M. Chetia et al.

condition. The soil mixes prepared are presented in Table 2. A soil mix prepared with
nine parts of clay ‘C’ and one part sand ‘S1’ by dry weight of mix is designated as
C-S1 (90:10). In similar manner other soil mixes as presented in Table 2 are desig-
nated. 36 soil mixes prepared with low compressibility clay C were kept for curing
duration of 24 h and 6 soil mixes prepared with high compressibility clay B were kept
for 3 days for curing prior to light compaction test as per IS (1974) along with C and B
samples (Fig. 1).

3 Results and Discussion

Figures 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 show the moisture content versus dry density plots for C, C-Q1,
C-Q2, C-Q3, C-QS1, C-QS2 and C-QS3 mixes. Moisture content and density plots for
C-S1, C-S2 and C-S3 are shown in Figs. 7, 8 and 9 respectively. Compaction curves
for B-QS1 and B-S1 are shown in Figs. 10 and 11 respectively. Table 3 presents the
compaction characteristics obtained from compaction curves of various soil mixes.

3.1 MDD and OMC for Intermediate Compressibility Clay (C) - Quarry
Dust Mixes
Figure 12(a) and (b) represent the variation of MDD and OMC respectively with
quarry dust content of different gradations for various intermediate compressibility

2.1
C-S2 (90:10)
C-S2 (80:20)
2.0
C-S2 (70:30)
C-S2 (60:40)
C
1.9
Dry density (g/cm )
3

1.8

1.7

1.6

1.5
5 10 15 20 25 30
Moisture content (%)

Fig. 2. Compaction curves for C and C-S2 mixes

 Effect of Quarry Dust on Compaction Characteristics of Clay 83

2.1
C-S3 (90:10)
C-S3 (80:20)
2.0 C-S3 (70:30)
C-S3 (60:40)
C
1.9
Dry density (g/cm )
3

1.8

1.7

1.6

1.5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Moisture content (%)

Fig. 3. Compaction curves for C and C-S3 mixes

2.0
C-Q1 (90:10)
C-Q1 (80:20)
C-Q1 (70:30)
1.9
C-Q1 (60:40)
C
Dry density (g/cm )
3

1.8

1.7

1.6

1.5
5 10 15 20 25 30
Moisture content (%)

Fig. 4. Compaction curves for C and C-Q1 mixes

84 M. Chetia et al.

2.0
C-Q2 (90:10)
C-Q2 (80:20)
1.9 C-Q2 (70:30)
C-Q2 (60:40)
C
Dry density (g/cm )
3

1.8

1.7

1.6

1.5
5 10 15 20 25 30
Moisture content (%)

Fig. 5. Compaction curves for C and C-Q2 mixes

2.1
C-Q3 (90:10)
C-Q3 (80:20)
2.0 C-Q3 (70:30)
C-Q3 (60:40)
C
1.9
Dry density (g/cm )
3

1.8

1.7

1.6

1.5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Moisture content (%)

Fig. 6. Compaction curves for C and C-Q3 mixes

 Effect of Quarry Dust on Compaction Characteristics of Clay 85

2.0
C-QS1 (90:10)
C-QS1 (80:20)
1.9 C-QS1 (70:30)
C-QS1 (60:40)
C
Dry density (g/cm )
3

1.8

1.7

1.6

1.5
5 10 15 20 25 30
Moisture content (%)

Fig. 7. Compaction curves for C and C-QS1 mixes

2.0
C-QS2 (90:10)
C-QS2 (80:20)
1.9 C-QS2 (70:30)
C-QS2 (60:40)
C
Dry density (g/cm )
3

1.8

1.7

1.6

1.5
5 10 15 20 25 30
Moisture content (%)

Fig. 8. Compaction curves for C and C-QS2 mixes

86 M. Chetia et al.

2.0 C-QS3 (90:10)

C-QS3 (80:20)
C-QS3 (70:30)
1.9 C-QS3 (60:40)
C
Dry density (g/cm )
3

1.8

1.7

1.6

1.5
6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28
Moisture content (%)

Fig. 9. Compaction curves for C and C-QS3 mixes

1.6
B-QS1 (80:15)
B-QS1 (70:30)
B-QS1 (55:45)
1.5
B
Dry density (g/cm )
3

1.4

1.3

1.2

1.1
15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Moisture content (%)

Fig. 10. Compaction curves for B and B-QS1 mixes

 Effect of Quarry Dust on Compaction Characteristics of Clay 87

1.6
B-S1 (85:15)
B-S1 (70:30)
1.5 B-S1 (55:45)
B
Dry density (g/cm )
3

1.4

1.3

1.2

1.1
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Moisture content (%)

Fig. 11. Compaction curves for B and B-S1 mixes

Table 3. Compaction characteristics of soil mixes

Soil/Soil mix OMC MDD Soil/Soil mix OMC MDD
(%) (g/cm3) (%) (g/cm3)
C 18.20 1.73 B 35.69 1.24
C-S1 (90:10) 13.77 1.81 B-S1 (85:15) 30.17 1.32
C-S1 (80:20) 12.50 1.84 B-S1 (70:30) 26.16 1.43
C-S1 (70:30) 11.14 1.91 B-S1 (55:45) 21.83 1.50
C-S1 (60:40) 11.70 1.93 B-QS1 30.45 1.30
(85:15)
C-S2 (90:10) 14.28 1.86 B-QS1 27.68 1.46
(70:30)
C-S2 (80:20) 14.11 1.89 B-QS1 25.00 1.52
(55:45)
C-S2 (70:30) 11.55 1.94
C-S2 (60:40) 9.83 1.99
C-S3 (90:10) 13.42 1.88
C-S3 (80:20) 11.75 1.93
C-S3 (70:30) 9.88 1.97
C-S3 (60:40) 8.93 2.02
C-Q1 (90:10) 14.05 1.78
C-Q1 (80:20) 13.44 1.82
C-Q1 (70:30) 11.01 1.89
C-Q1 (60:40) 12.50 1.87
(continued)
88 M. Chetia et al.

Table 3. (continued)
Soil/Soil mix OMC MDD Soil/Soil mix OMC MDD
(%) (g/cm3) (%) (g/cm3)
C-Q2 (90:10) 13.99 1.88
C-Q2 (80:20) 12.57 1.90
C-Q2 (70:30) 11.56 1.96
C-Q2 (60:40) 11.92 1.94
C-Q3 (90:10) 13.7 1.86
C-Q3 (80:20) 13.31 1.89
C-Q3 (70:30) 9.65 2.01
C-Q3 (60:40) 7.14 2.04
C-QS1 (90:10) 12.74 1.82
C-QS1 (80:20) 11.54 1.91
C-QS1 (70:30) 11.03 1.93
C-QS1 (60:40) 11.78 1.95
C-QS2 (90:10) 14.24 1.85
C-QS2 (80:20) 11.30 1.87
C-QS2 (70:30) 10.71 1.94
C-QS2 (60:40) 12.21 1.92
C-QS3 (90:10) 14.19 1.84
C-QS3 (80:20) 12.31 1.93
C-QS3 (70:30) 11.38 1.94
C-QS3 (60:40) 8.57 2.01

clay-quarry dust mixes. It was observed that with increase in respective quarry dust
content in mixes C-Q1, C-Q3 and C-QS3 MDD values are increasing and OMC values
are decreasing. However in case of mixes C-Q2, C-QS1 and C-QS3, the MDD values are
increasing till 30% quarry dust content and decreases at 40% content. Also for the
above mixes including mix C-Q1 the OMC values are decreasing up to quarry dust
content of 30% and an increase is observed at 40% quarry dust content in the mixes.
The increase can be attributed to the fact that the gradation of the mix getting well
graded with incorporation of granular material which results in higher density. Also the
OMC values are decreasing with increase in quarry dust content of the mixes as a result
of decreasing in clay fraction in the mixes. But at respective quarry dust content of 40%
in the mixes the observed decrease in MDD and increase in OMC may be due to the
accumulation of uniform size granular particles decreasing the compaction density and
resulting in requirement of more water with increase in amount of fines which may be
either due crushing of particles at higher quarry dust content in the mixes.
The effect of gradation of the quarry dust samples can be seen on the compaction
properties of the mixes. Mix C-Q1 is showing the lowest MDD values for all pro-
portions which may be due to presence of appreciable amount of fines in Q1 sample.
 Effect of Quarry Dust on Compaction Characteristics of Clay 89

Intermediate Compressibility Clay-Quarry Dust Mixes

C-Q1 C-Q2 C-Q3 C-QS1 C-QS2 C-QS3
2.10 15

14
2.05
13
2.00 12

11
MDD (g/cm )

1.95
3

OMC (%)
10
1.90
9

1.85 8

7
1.80
6

1.75 5
0 10 20 30 40 50 0 10 20 30 40 50
Quarry Dust (Q1, Q2, Q3, QS1, QS2 and QS3) content (%)
(a) (b)

Fig. 12. (a) Variation of MDD with quarry dust content (b) Variation of OMC with quarry dust
content for intermediate compressibility clay-quarry dust mixes

C-QS1 mix showing improved properties in comparison to C-Q1 mix for all proportion
which is due to the presence of negligible amount of fines present in sample QS1.
The mixes with quarry dust samples in the fine range are showing improved com-
paction properties for content up to 20% and mixes with quarry dust samples in
medium sand range are showing more MDD values and less OMC values for higher
quarry dust contents in comparison to other mixes. Though it can be observed that the
improvement for mixes C-Q2 and C-Q3 are comparably more than C-QS2 and C-QS3,
which can be due to the presence of larger size particles in more quantity within the
particular sand range of the provided quarry dust sample. Above discussions present a
clear effect of gradation of quarry dust samples on compaction properties of interme-
diate compressibility clay-quarry dust mixes.

3.2 MDD and OMC for Intermediate Compressibility Clay (C) - Sand
Mixes
Figure 13(a) and (b) represent the respective variation of MDD and OMC of various
intermediate compressibility clay-sand mixes with sand content of different gradations.
Increase in MDD values with increase in respective sand content have been observed
90 M. Chetia et al.

Intermediate Compressibility Clay-Sand Mixes

C-S1 C-S2 C-S3
2.05 15

14
2.00
13

1.95

OMC (%)
MDD (g/cm )

12
3

11
1.90

10
1.85
9

1.80 8
0 10 20 30 40 50 0 10 20 30 40 50
Sand (S1, S2 and S3) content (%)
(a) (b)
Fig. 13. (a) Variation of MDD with sand content (b) Variation of OMC with sand content for
intermediate compressibility clay-sand mixes

for all the mixes, which is due to the resulting well graded nature of mix with inclusion
of granular material to clay. The OMC values have been found to decrease for mixes
C-S2 and C-S2 with increase in respective sand content but an increase in OMC value
within 1% is observed for mix C-S1 for 40% S1 content after a gradual decrease of
OMC up to 30%. The decrease in OMC values can be attributed to the decrease in clay
content in the mixes.
Figure 13(a) shows that the mixes prepared with sand S1 gives lower MDD values
for each proportion in comparison to C-S2 and C-S3 mixes. Intermediate MDD values
are observed for mixes prepared with fine sand fraction S2 and higher MDD values are
given by mixes prepared with medium sand fraction S3 for each proportion of sand
content in the respective mixes. MDD increases with inclusion of larger size particles in
case of clay sand mixes. As presented in Fig. 13(b), intermediate OMC values are
given by C-S1 mixes, lower values are observed for C-S3 mixes and higher values of
OMC are obtained for C-S2 mixes for same proportion of respective sand sample in the
mixes with increase in particle size overall surface area decreases with increase in
content resulting in lower requirement of water to attain maximum densification due to
which mixes prepared with medium sand fraction show lower OMC values in com-
parison to others. The influence of gradation is clearly indicated upon the compaction
properties of clay-sand mixes as discussed above.
 Effect of Quarry Dust on Compaction Characteristics of Clay 91

3.3 MDD and OMC for High Compressibility Clay (B) - Quarry Dust
Mixes
The variation of MDD with increase in quarry dust content for B-QS1 mix is presented
in Fig. 14(a). With increase in QS1 content, increase in MDD value have been
observed, the reason being the addition of bigger size particles to the fines resulting in a
well graded mix. Figure 14(b) represents the decrease in OMC values with increasing
QS1 content in B-QS1 mix, which is due to decrease in clay content.

High Compressibility Clay-Quarry Dust Mix

B-QS1
1.55 38

1.50 36

1.45 34
MDD(g/cm)
3

OMC (%)
1.40 32

1.35 30

1.30 28

1.25 26

1.20 24
0 10 20 30 40 50 0 10 20 30 40 50
Quarry dust (QS1) content (%)
(a) (b)
Fig. 14. (a) Variation of MDD with quarry dust content (b) Variation of OMC with quarry dust
content for high compressibility clay-quarry dust mix

3.4 MDD and OMC for High Compressibility Clay (B) - Sand Mixes
Variation of MDD and OMC with increasing sand content in B-S1 mix is presented in
Fig. 15(a) and (b) respectively. Increase in MDD and decrease in OMC is observed
with increase in sand content in the mix. The reason being same as discussed above.

3.5 Comparison of MDD and OMC Variation of Clay Sand and Clay
Quarry Dust Mixes
From Fig. 16(a), it can be observed that mix prepared with quarry dust sample Q1
shows lower values of MDD in comparison to C-QS1 and C-S1 mixes for each per-
centage of the additive sample due to presence of more amount of quarry dust fines. For
mixes prepared with similar gradation of quarry dust and sand, C-QS1 mix shows
92 M. Chetia et al.

High Compressibility Clay-Sand Mix

B-S1
1.55 38

36
1.50
34
1.45
32
MDD (g/cm)
3

1.40

OMC (%)
30

1.35 28

26
1.30
24
1.25
22

1.20 20
0 10 20 30 40 50 0 10 20 30 40 50
Sand (S1) content (%)
(a) (b)
Fig. 15. (a) Variation of MDD with sand content (b) Variation of OMC with sand content for
high compressibility clay-sand mix

2.05

2.00

1.95
MDD (g/cm)
3

1.90

1.85

1.80 C-Q1 C-Q2 C-Q3

C-QS1 C-QS2 C-QS3
C-S1 C-S2 C-S3
1.75
10 20 30 40 10 20 30 40 10 20 30 40
Q1, QS1 and S1 Q2, QS2 and S2 Q3, QS3 and S3
content (%) content (%) content (%)
(a) (b) (c)

Fig. 16. (a) Comparison of MDD of C-Q1, C-QS1 and C-S1 mixes (b) Comparison of MDD of
C-Q2, C-QS2 and C-S2 mixes (c) Comparison of MDD of C-Q3, C-QS3 and C-S3 mixes
 Effect of Quarry Dust on Compaction Characteristics of Clay 93

higher values of MDD in comparison to C-S1 mix which might be due to greater
interlocking of various sizes of quarry dust particles. From Fig. 16(b) and (c), it is
observed that for similar gradation of sand and quarry dust in fine sand range and
medium sand range the MDD values are on the higher side for mixes prepared with
sand in comparison to those of prepared with quarry dust, the reason may be angular
shape of quarry dust particles resulting in lower densities.
It was found that minimum OMC values for each proportion are given by C-Q3
mixes as evident from Fig. 17(a). It can be seen from Fig. 17(b) OMC values for C-QS2
mix are less than that of C-S2 mix. However that additive content of 30% in C-Q2 and
C-QS2 mix the OMC value increases which may be due crushing of quarry dust
particles to fines increasing the water requirement. For mixes prepared with medium
sand fractions of additive contents, the OMC values obtained for C-QS3 mix are higher
than that of C-S3 mixes as presented in Fig. 17(c). The inference drawn from above
comparison is that for intermediate compressibility clay, incorporation of quarry dust
having similar gradation to sand results in improved compaction characteristics in
comparison to that of sand. For particles in fine sand range of quarry dust, improvement
is effective up to 30% content and use of medium sand range quarry dust will result in
comparably similar values of compaction parameters.

15

14

13

12
OMC (%)

11

10

C-Q1 C-Q2 C-Q3

8 C-QS1 C-QS2 C-QS3
C-S1 C-S2 C-S3
7
10 20 30 40 10 20 30 40 10 20 30 40
Q1, QS1 and S1 Q2, QS2 and S2 Q3, QS3 and S3
content (%) content (%) content (%)
(a) (b) (c)

Fig. 17. (a) Comparison of OMC of C-Q1, C-QS1 and C-S1 mixes (b) Comparison of OMC of
C-Q2, C-QS2 and C-S2 mixes (c) Comparison of OMC of C-Q3, C-QS3 and C-S3 mixes
94 M. Chetia et al.

The comparison for MDD and OMC with additive content for mixes B-S1 and
B-S1 as evident in Fig. 18(a) and (b) reveals that in case of high compressibility clay
higher MDD values are obtained with incorporation of quarry dust in the sand range in
comparison to that of sand at higher additive content. Also the OMC requirement for
clay deceases with increasing quarry dust content though it is less compared to that of
increasing sand content.

B-QS1 B-S1
1.55 38

36
1.50
34
1.45
32

1.40 30

OMC (%)
MDD (%)

1.35 28

26
1.30
24
1.25
22

1.20 20
0 15 30 45 0 15 30 45
QS1 and S1 content (%)
(a) (b)
Fig. 18. (a) Comparison of MDD of B-QS1 and B-S1 mixes (b) Comparison of OMC of B-QS1
and B-S1 mixes

3.6 Comparison of MDD-OMC Relationships

Figures 19 and 20 present the linear correlation between OMC and MDD for the mixes
of present investigation with regression coefficient R2. Figure 19(a) represents the
linear MDD-OMC relationship for all mixes of intermediate compressibility clay with
the quarry dust samples Q1, Q2 and Q3 irrespective of the gradation i.e. mixes C-Q1,
C-Q2 and C-Q3 taken together. Similarly Fig. 19(b) represents the same for C-QS1,
C-QS2 and C-QS3 taken together. Figure 19(c) indicates the variation of MDD with
OMC for all clay ‘C’- quarry dust mixes and the same is shown by Fig. 19(c) for all
clay ‘C’ and sand mixes irrespective of gradation of sand. The correlation between
MDD and OMC of B-QS1 and B-QS2 mixes are shown in Fig. 20(a) and
(b) respectively.
 Effect of Quarry Dust on Compaction Characteristics of Clay 95

2 .1
C -Q M ixes C -Q S M ixes

2 .0
MDD (g/cm )
3

1 .9

1 .8

M D D = 2 .29 - 0.3 2 O M C M D D = 2 .2 5 - 0.02 9 O M C

2 2
R = 0 .77 R = 0 .67
1 .7
5 10 15 5 10 15
O M C (% )

(a) (b)

2.2
All Clay 'C'-Quarry All Clay 'C'-Sand
Dust Mixes Mixes
2.1

2.0
MDD (g/cm )
3

1.9

1.8
MDD = 2.28 - 0.031 OMC MDD = 2.28 - 0.031 OMC
2 2
R = 0.78 R = 0.73
1.7
5 10 15 20 5 10 15 20
OMC (%)
(c) (d)
Fig. 19. (a) Correlation of MDD with OMC for all C-Q mixes (b) Correlation of MDD with
OMC for all C-QS mixes (c) Correlation of MDD with OMC for all intermediate compressibility
clay-quarry dust mixes (d) Correlation of MDD with OMC for all intermediate compressibility
clay-sand mixes
96 M. Chetia et al.

1 .6
B -Q S 1 M ix B -S 1 M ix

1 .5

1 .4
MDD (g/cm )
3

1 .3

1 .2

M D D = 2 .2 0 - 0 .0 2 7 O M C M D D = 1 .9 2 - 0 .0 1 9 O M C
2 2
R = 0 .9 1 R = 0 .9 8
1 .1
20 25 30 35 40 20 25 30 35 40
O M C (% )
(a) (b)
Fig. 20. (a) Correlation of MDD with OMC for B-QS1 mix (b) Correlation of MDD with OMC
for B-S1 mix

Influence of clay type on MDD-OMC relationship. The influence of clay type on

MDD-OMC relationship of mixes has been presented in Fig. 21(a) and (b) for OMC
range of 5 to 30%. The comparison of correlations for all clay ‘C’-quarry dust mixes
and B-QS mix shows that the variation in MDD with OMC are compatibly same. But
for mix B-S1 the rate of increase in MDD with decrease in OMC is less compared to
that of all clay-sand mixes. Use of quarry dust is as effective in high compressibility
soil as in intermediate compressibility soil.
Influence of additives of similar gradation on MDD-OMC relationship. Comparison
have been made in between the MDD-OMC relationships obtained for C-QS and C-S
mixes and in between that of B-QS1 and B-S1 mixes as shown in Fig. 22(a) and
(b) respectively. It was found that for intermediate compressibility clay mixes prepared
with similar gradation of quarry dust and sand, the correlations obtained between MDD
and OMC are almost similar within the experimental range of OMC. For mixes pre-
pared with high compressibility clay with similar gradation of additive samples the
increase in MDD with decrease in OMC is more in case of quarry dust addition
compared to addition of sand.
Comparison of MDD-OMC relationships of present investigation and existing
relationship in literature. Figure 23(a) shows the comparison of variation of
MDD-OMC correlation of all clay ‘C’-sand and clay ‘C’-quarry dust mixes of present
investigation to that obtained for naturally occurring soils for Standard Proctor energy
level and all compaction energy levels within an OMC range of 5 to 15%. The trend
lines for all clay-sand and all clay-quarry dust mixes of present investigation are almost
parallel and above the trend line observed for Standard Proctor energy level and below
 Effect of Quarry Dust on Compaction Characteristics of Clay 97

2.2 2.2

2.0 2.0

1.8 1.8
MDD (g/cm )
3

MDD (g/cm )
3
1.6 1.6

1.4 1.4

1.2 All clay 'C'-quarry dust All clay 'C'- sand Mixes 1.2
Mixes B-S1 Mix
B-QS1 Mix
1.0 1.0
0 10 20 30 40 0 10 20 30 40
OMC (%)
(a) (b)
Fig. 21. Influence of clay type on soil mixes prepared with quarry dust

2.2 1.7

2.1
1.6

2.0
MDD (g/cm)
MDD (g/cm)

3
3

1.5

1.9

1.4
1.8
C-QS Mixes B-QS1 Mix
C-S Mixes B-S1 Mix
1.7 1.3
5 10 15 20 25 30
OMC (%)
(a) (b)

Fig. 22. (a) Comparison of MDD-OMC correlations of all intermediate compressibility

clay-quarry dust and clay-sand mixes for similar gradation of additive samples (b) Comparison
of MDD-OMC correlations of high compressibility clay-quarry dust and clay-sand mixes for
similar gradation of additive samples
98 M. Chetia et al.

All Intermediate clay - quarry dust mixes (Present Investigation)

All Intermediate clay - sand mixes (Present Investigation)
Naturally occuring soils: Standrad Proctor energy level
(Gurtug and Sidharan 2004)
Naturally occuring soils: All compaction energy level
(Gurtug and Sidharan 2004)
B-QS1 Mix (Pesent Investigation)
B-S1 Mix (Pesent Investigation)
2.2 1.8

2.1 1.7

2.0 1.6

MDD (g/cm )
3
MDD (g/cm )
3

1.9 1.5

1.8 1.4

1.7 1.3
5 10 15 20 25 30
OMC (%)
(a) (b)
Fig. 23. (a) Comparison of MDD-OMC correlations of all intermediate compressibility
clay-quarry dust and clay-sand mixes of present investigation with that of naturally occurring
soils proposed by Gurtug and Sridharan (2004) (b) Comparison of MDD-OMC correlations of all
high compressibility clay-quarry dust and clay-sand mixes of present investigation with that of
naturally occurring soils proposed by Gurtug and Sridharan (2004)

the one observed for all compaction energy levels, however the difference is marginal
(within 0.1 g/cm3). The comparison reveals the clay-quarry dust mixes follows similar
trends of MDD-OMC correlation as that of clay-sand mixes and that of naturally
occurring soils which also supports the use of quarry dust in replacement of sand in
compaction operations of clays of intermediate compressibility.
Figure 23(b) shows the comparison of variation of MDD-OMC correlation of
bentonite-sand ‘B-SS’ and bentonite-quarry dust ‘B-QS’ mixes to those proposed by
Gurtug and Sridharan (2004) within OMC range of 20 to 30%. Results indicate that for
Standard Proctor energy level the correlation obtained for B-QS1 mix is similar to that
 Effect of Quarry Dust on Compaction Characteristics of Clay 99

of naturally occurring soils. The trend line observed for B-S1 mix is much below the
trendlines for naturally occurring soils for Standard Proctor energy level and all
compaction energy levels. In case of high compressibility clays like bentonite the
results obtained for mix prepared with quarry dust are more superior in compaction
behavior compared to that prepared with sand.

4 Conclusions

This study investigates the influence of quarry dust addition of different gradations on
the compaction behavior of clay of different compressibility. Light compaction tests
were carried out on soil mixes prepared with different quarry dust content with two
different clays of different compressibility. Compaction characteristics of these soil
mixes are compared to those of clay-sand mixes by using sand samples having similar
gradation to that of quarry dust. The MDD-OMC relationship of soil mixes of present
study have been compared to that of naturally occurring soil found in literature. The
following conclusions can be drawn from this study:
1. MDD increases and OMC decreases with increase in quarry dust content of any
gradation in intermediate compressibility clay-quarry dust mixes. The increase in
MDD and decrease in OMC is very effective up to a quarry dust content of 30%.
Similar behavior is observed for high compressibility-quarry dust mixes.
2. For any given proportion of intermediate clay-quarry dust mixes, mixes prepared
with medium range particles shows higher MDD values and lower OMC values at
higher quarry dust contents.
3. For mixes prepared with intermediate compressibility clay with quarry dust samples
having similar gradation to that of sand sample, for all proportions, C-QS1 mixes
show higher MDD values in comparison to that of C-S1 mixes, comparable MDD
values are obtained for C-QS2 mixes and C-S2 mixes up to additive content of 30%
and for C-QS3 and C-S3 mixes MDD values obtained are similar leading to
increased possibility of replacement of sand with similar gradation of quarry dust.
4. OMC observed for C-QS1 and C-QS2 mixes are relatively more than those obtained
for C-S1 and C-S2 mixes respectively at low additive content. For C-QS3 and C-S3
mixes OMC is more or less same upto 30%, after which significant decrease in
OMC is observed for C-QS3 mix.
5. For mixes prepared with similar gradation of sand and quarry dust with high
compressibility clay for all proportions, MDD values obtained are comparably
similar but significant increase in OMC is observed for higher content of quarry
dust in the mix in comparison to similar content of sand in the mix.
6. Similar MDD-OMC relationships are obtained for both clay types where quarry
dust is used as additive. However the increase in MDD is more with decrease in
OMC for intermediate clay-sand mix in comparison to that of high compressibility
clay-sand mix.
7. MDD-OMC relationship obtained for mixes prepared with intermediate com-
pressibility clay and quarry dust is similar to that of same prepared with sand
irrespective of gradation of additives. For high compressibility clay mixes with
100 M. Chetia et al.

quarry dust, the MDD increase is more with decrease in OMC in comparison to that
of prepared with sand.
8. MDD-OMC relationships obtained for all clay-sand mixes, all clay quarry dust
mixes and bentonite-quarry dust mixes are found to lie in between those as sug-
gested by researchers for natural soils for standard Proctor energy level and all
compaction energy levels. It also signifies irrespective of gradation of quarry dust, it
can replace sand to increase the compaction properties in both intermediate and
high compressibility clays.
9. This investigation brings out that quarry dust which is a waste material could
replace sand, which has become very costly, to improve the engineering properties
of fine grained soils including highly plastic bentonite clay. This has been brought
out in this investigation for different gradations of the quarry dust as well.

References
BS 812-104. Testing aggregates. Method for Qualitative and Quantitative Petrographic
Examination of Aggregates, British Standards Institution (1994)
Gurtug, Y., Sridharan, A.: Compaction behavior and prediction of its characteristics of fine
grained soils with particular reference to compaction energy. Soils Found. Sci. Direct. (2004).
doi:10.3208/sandf.44.5_27
IS 2720-III. Determination of specific gravity of soils. Indian Standard Methods of Test for Soils,
Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi (1980)
IS 2720-IV. Grain-size analysis. Indian Standard Methods of Test for Soils, Bureau of Indian
Standards, New Delhi (1975)
IS 2720-V. Determination of liquid limit and plastic limit. Indian Standard Methods of Test for
Soils, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi (1985)
IS 1498. Indian standard classification and identification of soils for general engineering
purposes. Indian Standard Methods of Test for Soils, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi
(1970)
IS 2720-VII (1974). Determination of water content-dry density relation using light compaction.
Indian Standard Methods of Test for Soils, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi (1974)
Sarvade, P.G., Nayak, S.: Studies on utilization of quarry dust to improve the geotechnical
properties of lithomargic clay. Int. J. Adv. Struct. Geotech. Eng. (2014). ISSN 2319-5347
Soosan, T.G., Jose, B.T., Abraham B.M.: Use of quarry dust in embankment and highway
construction. In: Proceedings of Indian Geo-technical Conference, Indore, pp. 274–277,
December 2001
Soosan, T.G., Sridharan, A., Jose, B.T., Abraham, B.M.: Utilization of quarry dust to improve
the geotechnical properties of soils in highway construction. Geotech. Test. J., ASTM (2005).
doi:10.1520/GTJ11768
Sridharan, A., Soosan, T.G., Jose, B.T., Abraham, B.M.: Shear strength studies on soil-quarry
dust mixtures. Geotech. Geol. Eng. Springer (2006). doi:10.1007/s10706-005-1216-9
Srikanth, V., Mishra, A.K.: A laboratory study on the geotechnical characteristics of sand
bentonite mixtures and the role of particle size of sand. Int. J. Geosynthetics Ground Eng.
(2016). doi:10.1007/s40891-015-0043-1