JM 1004545
JM 1004545
JM 1004545
Synthesis and Identification of New 4-Arylidene Curcumin Analogues as Potential Anticancer Agents
Targeting Nuclear Factor-KB Signaling Pathway
Xu Qiu,†,§ Yuhong Du,‡,§ Bin Lou,‡ Yinglin Zuo,† Weiyan Shao,† Yingpeng Huo,† Jianing Huang,† Yanjun Yu,† Binhua Zhou,†
Jun Du,† Haian Fu,*,‡ and Xianzhang Bu*,†
†
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China, and ‡Department of Pharmacology and
Emory Chemical Biology Discovery Center, Emory University School of Medicine, 1510 Clifton Road, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States.
§
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Figure 1. Structures of 1,3-diketones curcumin analogues (1-6), monoketone curcumin analogues (7-10), 4-arylidene crucumin analogues
(13-37), and 4-hydroxymethylene curcumin analogues (38-40).
bioavailability.25 Attempts have been made by others to chem- analogues have significantly improved IKK/NF-κB inhibi-
ically modify curcumin in order to increase its activity against tion activity and elevated cytotoxicity over the parent com-
cancer and NF-κB.26-31 However, most of these investiga- pound curcumin. These compounds effectively decreased
tions have focused on design, synthesis, and activity of 1,3- growth and reduced the tumorigenic potential of cancer cells,
diketones and monoketone analogues of curcumin. However, as seen in a clonogenic assay.
curcuminoids, such as Knoevenagel condensates of curcumin
Results and Discussion
analogues, contain a novel skeleton and remain quite less in-
vestigated.28,32,33 In 2006, Ajit P. Zambre et al. reported that Chemistry. To search for potent analogues with favorable
copper(II) conjugates of Knoevenagel condensates of curcu- medicinal properties, we extended the molecular diversity of
min showed potential in inhibiting TNFR induced NF-κB curcuminiods by designing three types of curcuminoids: 1,3-
activation.28 Nevertheless, highly active and clinically promis- diketones curcumin analogues, monoketone curcumin ana-
ing curcuminoids remain to be developed. A systematic in- logues, and 4-arylidene curcumin analogues (4-arylidene-1,
vestigation of current curcumin analogues would greatly 7-bisarylhepta-1,6-diene-3,5-diones) (Figure 1).
facilitate the development of new curcumin analogues for Classical 1,3-diketones (1-6) including curcumin (1) and a
therapeutic interventions. In the present study, we describe the representative 1,3-diketone derivative with known activity
synthesis and identification of new 4-arylidene curcumin (3)34 were synthesized using a previously reported proce-
analogues (Knoevenagel condensates of 1,3-diketones curcu- dure35 with slight modification (Scheme 1). Briefly, to pro-
min analogues with aromatic aldehydes) as a new class of tect the C-3 of acetylacetone from an unwanted Knoevenagel
potential anticancer agents. Screening of the synthesized reaction, a boric acetylacetone anhydride complex was pre-
compounds with high content analysis technology, coupled pared first by refluxing acetylacetone with boric anhydride
with biochemical studies, revealed that 4-arylidene curcumin in EtOAc. The final products 1-6 were synthesized by aldol
8262 Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2010, Vol. 53, No. 23 Qiu et al.
condensation of protected acetylacetone aromatic aldehydes (38-40, Figure 1), which possess absolute diketone moieties,
as described. were designed as references. 38, 39, and 40 were synthesized
Monoketone curcumin analogues have been extensively by refluxing triethoxymethane and Ac2O with 1, 2, and 3,
investigated because of their potential anticancer activities. respectively (Scheme 3).
7 has been reported to have high activity in antitumor assays36 New 4-Arylidene Crucumin Analogues Exhibit Potent In-
and was therefore considered; 9 and 10 are asymmetric an- hibitory Activity against Caner Cells. In order to evaluate the
alogues of 7. These three compounds were included in our anticancer activities of new curcumin derivatives, we tested
work to represent monoketone curcumin analogues. 7 and the effects of synthesized compounds on the growth of A549
the intermediate 11 were synthesized by treating 3,4,5-tri- lung adenocarcinoma cells. For comparison, dose-response
methoxybenzaldehyde with excess acetone in the presence of experiments were carried out to obtain GI50 values for each
KOH. 9 and 10 were synthesized by condensing 11 with compound as previously described,37 with curcumin (1) as a
veratraldehyde and 3-methylthiophene-2-carbaldehyde, re- control. As summarized in Table 1, all the traditional 1,3-
spectively. Furthermore, another new compound, 8, was pre- diketone cucumin analogues (1-6) showed moderate to
pared by condensing 12 and 3,4,5-trimethoxybenzaldehyde. poor activity against A549 growth, while improved antipro-
The intermediate 12 was obtained using the same conditions liferation activities of monoketone analogues 7 and 9 were
as in the synthesis of 1-6 except the excess protected acet- observed (GI50 of 0.53 and 1.21 μM respectively).
ylacetone (Scheme 2). At the same time, the thiophene ring moiety bearing 10
Compared to the large number of traditional 1,3-dike- (GI50 = 9.31 μM) showed decreased activity compared to
tones and monoketone curcumin analogues that have been 7 and 9, indicating that S replacement of the O atom in the
designed and evaluated, investigation of Knoevenagel con- heterocycle of 9 made a negative contribution to its activity.
densates of curcuminoids remains scarce. In our current As a regioisomer of 4, the Knoevenagel condensate 8 ex-
work, 23 new 4-arylidene curcumin analogues (Knoevenagel hibited much higher activity (GI50 =0.53 μM) than 4. 8 can
condensates 13-17, 19-28, 30-37) were designed and syn- also be regarded as a monoketone curumin analogue with an
thesized by coupling 1-4 with different aromatic aldehydes acetyl substitution. When the activities of 7-9 and 1-6 were
in toluene with AcOH and piperidine as a catalyst. The known compared, it was revealed that the spacing of the two aro-
4-arylidene curcumin analogues 18 and 29 were synthesized matic rings most likely influences the activity of curcumin
under the same conditions except with acetylacetone and analogues against A549 growth. The close activities of 8
aldehydes as reactants (Scheme 1). and 7 indicated that the acetyl group has no apparent effect
The 4-arylidene modification can induce a change of a on activity against A549 growth.
partial enolic diketone, which is universal in 1,3-diketones Remarkably, most of the 4-arylidene curcumin analogues
curcumin analogues, to an absolute diketone moiety, possi- (4-arylidene-1,7-bisarylhepta-1,6-diene-3, 5-diones, 13-37)
bly affecting bioactivity. To explore the effect of this transi- showed potent anticancer activities with a GI50 in the sub-
tion, three new 4-hydroxymethylene curcumin analogues micromolar range (0.23-0.93 μM), except 15, 19, 29, and 37
which exhibited slightly lower activities (GI50 of 1.12-
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Compounds 1-6 and 13-37a 2.62 μM). The potency of 4-arylidene analogues was improved
by 10- to 60-fold over the parent compound curcumin in this
assay. 4-Hydroxymethylene curcumin analogues (38-40),
however, showed poor activity, suggesting the importance of
a
Reagents and conditions: (a) B2O3, B(n-BuO)3, n-BuNH2; (b) HCl;
(c) piperidine, AcOH, toluene, 140 °C. a
Reagents and conditions: (a) triethoxymethane, Ac2O, 140 °C, 5 h.
a
Reagents and conditions: (a) excess acetone, KOH/H2O, MeOH; (b) pre-mixed acetylacetone and B(n-BuO)3, n-BuNH2, 80 °C to room temperature;
(c) HCl, room temperature; (d) 3,4,5-trimethoxybenzaldehyde, DMF, reflux; (e) veratraldehyde or 3-methylthiophene-2-carbaldehyde, KOH/H2O,
MeOH.
Article Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2010, Vol. 53, No. 23 8263
Figure 7. Binding of compound 17 and ATP with the IKKβ catalytic domain homology model. Left: Overlay of compound 17 (colored by
atom type) and ATP (purple) in the ATP binding pocket. The molecules are represented in stick. Typical hydrogen bonds of compound 17
(green dotted line) and ATP (brown dotted line) with the homology model are shown. Right: Surface representation of the IKKβ catalytic
domain homology model with compound 17 (colored by atom type) and ATP (purple) docking into the ATP binding pocket. The kinase surface
was mapped by lipophilic potential (from orange to blue, lipophilic potential decrease) and Z-clipping to remove the N terminal region for
visualization facility. Compound 17 adopts a propeller-shaped conformation in the pocket.
4 μM. These studies demonstrate that these 4-arylidene cur- Consistent with their enhanced activity against a major
cumin analogues have significantly improved anticancer ac- molecular target, the representative 4-arylidene curcumin ana-
tivity over the parental curcumin. logues effectively inhibited the viability of three types of lung
Molecular Modeling of the IKKβ/17 Complex. To gain cancer cells and attenuated the clonogenic activity of A549
insights into the potential binding pose of the 4-arylidene cur- cells. On the basis of our finding, it can be concluded that the
cumin analogues in IKKβ, a molecular docking analysis was triarylvinyl skeleton of 4-arylidene curcumin analogues acts
carried out. Since three-dimensional structural data are un- as a phamacophore, and the 4-arylmethylene modification is
available for IKKβ, a homology model of the IKKβ catalytic an effective strategy to improve the NF-κB inhibitory activ-
domain was built based on four templates (PDB codes 2JC6, ity of curcumin analogues.
1A06, 2QNJ, and 2A2A) from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) Although presented data support an important role of
(see Experiments for details). Discovery Studio 2.1 (Accelrys IKKβ in the NF-κB pathway in mediating the effect of re-
Inc.) and Sybyl 7.3.5 (Tripos Inc.) were used for the homol- ported compounds, some observed differences in compound
ogy model building and energy minimization of the IKKβ potency between cell viability assay and the IKKβ/NF-κB
catalytic domain, respectively. The docking of the selected assays could be due to a number of factors. For example,
compound, 17, to the IKKβ homology model suggests that (i) the status of compounds in cell culture and in vitro con-
17 could potentially bind to the ATP pocket of IKKβ (Figure 7). ditions could be different. The employed compounds could
Compound 17 adopts a propeller-shaped conformation in be further metabolized in cells to generate multiple active
the pocket. The 4-arylidene moiety of 17 occupied the main species, while in vitro kinase assays only measure the activity
hydrophobic adenine binding pockets (Figure 7, region A). of the test compounds. (ii) Although IKKβ could be an
The 40 -OH and 30 -OMe in 4-arylidene moiety of 17 have important target of the tested curcumin analogues as pro-
hydrogen bonds respectively with hinge region residues Glu97 posed, the efficacy of the test compounds on cell survival is
and Cys99, which are the same residues targeted by the also determined by the cell’s genetic background. Cells har-
adenine moiety during the interaction of ATP with IKKβ boring different oncogene mutations, deletions, or amplifi-
catalytic domain. Furthermore, one of the 1,7-diaryl moieties cations could show different sensitivities to test compounds
of compound 17 lies along the phosphate binding pockets that target IKKβ. Our data in Figure 2 strongly support this
(Figure 7, region P) with a hydrogen bond between a 30 -OMe model. (iii) The suppression of cell growth by these curcumin
and residue Thr180. The other side of 1,7-diaryl moieties analogues could be due to their inhibition of other targets in
extends from the ribose binding pockets (Figure 7, region R) addition to IKKβ. These potential targets include the cyto-
to the hydrophilic solvent-exposed entrance (Figure 7, region protective antioxidant system. Whether and how these
E), keeps orthogonal with the 4-arylidene moiety of 17, and 4-arylidene curcumin analogues inhibit other targets in
addition to IKKβ in cancer cells requires further investiga-
has a hydrogen bond between a 40 -OMe and residue Asp103
tion. Regardless, because of their potent IKKβ inhibitory
in the entrance region of the catalytic domain. It should be
activity, these novel triarylvinyl curcuminoids represent new
cautioned that this computer model provides a starting point,
opportunities for therapeutic development against cancer and
and details of the structure-activity relationship (SAR) have
other NF-κB dependent disorders, including various in-
to be experimentally tested in future work.
flammatory diseases. Detailed SAR analysis is still required
In summary, our design and synthesis have led to the gen-
and is being actively pursued by our laboratory.
eration of a novel series of curcumin analogues. Biochemical
and cell biology based studies coupled with high content Experiments
analysis have led to the identification of a novel class of
General. All reagents used were commercially available. Sol-
4-arylidene curcumin analogues as a new generation of highly vents were treated using standard techniques. Reactions were
potent curcuminoids. These compounds exhibited signifi- monitored by TLC on a glass plate coated with silica gel with
cantly improved potency in blocking IKK activity and the fluorescent indicator (GF254). Column chromatography was
NF-κB pathway as revealed by both in vivo and in vitro performed on silica gel (100-200 mesh). 1H NMR and 13C
kinase assays and pathway analysis. NMR spectra were recorded with Varian INOVA 500NB or
Article Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2010, Vol. 53, No. 23 8267
Bruker Ultrashield 400 MHz spectrometer using TMS as an in- General Procedure for the Synthesis of 9 and 10. 11 (236 mg,
ternal standard. Purity of target compounds was determined by 1 mmol) and 1 mmol of the corresponding benzaldehyde were
reversed-phase HPLC analyses (Hypersil BDS-C18, 250 μm dissolved in 5 mL of EtOH, and KOH (56 mg, 1 mmol, dissolved
4.6 μm) with a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. The samples were eluted in 0.1 mL H2O) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred for
with a gradient of constant 70% A (2-4 and 40), 90% A (38 and 1 h at room temperature. Then the solution was poured into
39), or 50% A (others), where solvent A was CH3CN and sol- water and the resulting solution was neutralized by 2 N HCl. The
vent B was 0.1% TFA in water, using UV monitor at 254 nm for raw product was extracted with ethyl acetate, and the organic
detection. Retention times (tR) were calculated in minutes, and layer was washed with water (10 mL, 2 times), dried (Na2SO4),
purity was calculated as % total area. All compounds were >95% and evaporated under vacuum. Finally the raw product was puri-
pure by HPLC. The HR-MS analysis was performed on a Thermo fied with column chromatography to give the final product.
Finnigan MAT95XP-Trap instrument. (1E,4E)-1-(3,4-Dimethoxyphenyl)-5-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)-
Chemistry. Synthesis of 1-10. 5-Hydroxy-1,7-bis(4-hydroxy penta-1,4-dien-3-one (9). 3,4-dimethoxybenzaldehyde (166 mg,
-3-methoxyphenyl)hepta-1,4,6-trien-3-one (1), 5-hydroxy-1,7- 1 mmol) was used as the benzaldehyde, and column chroma-
bis(4- methoxyphenyl)hepta-1,4,6-trien-3-one (2), 1,7-bis(3,4- tography (petroleum ether/acetic ether 2:1) gave 324 mg of 9 as a
dimethoxyphenyl)-5-hydroxyhepta-1,4,6-trien-3-one (3), 5-hydroxy- yellow powder, yield 84%. HPLC tR = 13.5 min; Rf = 0.14
1,7-bis(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)hepta-1,4,6-trien-3-one (4), (petroleum ether/acetic ether 2:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3)
5-hydroxy-1,7-bis(5-methylfuran-2-yl)hepta-1,4,6-trien-3-one (5), δ 7.69 (d, J=15.8 Hz, 1H), 7.64 (d, J=15.8 Hz, 1H), 7.20 (dd, J=
and 1,7-di(furan-2-yl)-5-hydroxyhepta-1,4,6-trien-3-one (6) were 1.9, 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.13 (d, J=1.9 Hz, 1H), 6.96 (d, J=15.8 Hz,
synthesized according to our previous report.35 1H), 6.95 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 6.88 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 6.84
(E)-4-(3,4,5-Trimethoxyphenyl)but-3-en-2-one (11) and (1E,4E)- (s, 2H), 3.93 (s, 3H), 3.92 (s, 3H), 3.90 (s, 6H), 3.89 (s, 3H). 13C
1,5-Bis(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)penta-1,4-dien-3-one (7). To a NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 188.60, 153.51, 151.49, 149.33,
solution of 3 mL of acetone in 10 mL of EtOH, 0.84 g KOH 143.40, 143.03, 140.41, 130.41, 127.82, 125.00, 123.51, 123.21,
(15 mmol, dissolved in 5 mL H2O) was added at 0 °C, and the mix- 111.20, 110.04, 105.66, 61.02, 56.25, 56.03, 55.99.
ture was stirred for 20 min. After that, 2.94 g of 3,4,5-trimetho- (1E,4E)-1-(3-Methylthiophen-2-yl)-5-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)-
xybenzaldehyde (15 mmol, dissolved in 25 mL of EtOH) was penta-1,4-dien-3-one (10). 3-methylthiophene-2-carbaldehyde
added dropwise. Then the mixture was brought to room tem- (126 mg, 1 mmol) was used as the benzaldehyde, and column
perature for 2 h and monitored by TLC. Once the 3,4,5-tri- chromatography (petroleum ether/acetic ether 9:1) gave 266
methoxybenzaldehyde was consumed, the reaction solution was mg 10 as a yellow powder, yield 77%. HPLC tR=22.9 min; Rf=
poured into water, and the resulting solution was neutralized by 0.39 (petroleum ether/acetic ether 3:1). HR-MS calcd for
2 N HCl. Then the raw product was extracted from water by C19H20O4S1: 344.1077, found 344.1074. 1H NMR (400 MHz,
acetic ether and purified with column chromatography (petro- CDCl3) δ 7.96 (d, J=15.3 Hz, 1H), 7.63 (d, J=15.9 Hz, 1H),
leum ether/acetic ether 5:1) to give 1.23 g of intermediate 11 7.30 (d, J=5.1 Hz, 1H), 6.91 (d, J=5.1 Hz, 1H), 6.88 (d, J=
(35%) and 1.53 g of yellow powder 7 (49%). HPLC tR = 15.9 Hz, 1H), 6.86 (d, J=15.3 Hz, 1H), 6.85 (s, 2H), 3.92 (s,
17.8 min; Rf=0.38 (petroleum ether/acetic ether 2:1). 1H NMR 6H), 3.90 (s, 3H), 2.40 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3)
(400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.65 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 2H), 6.97 (d, J = δ 188.07, 153.48, 142.94, 142.68, 134.48, 134.16, 131.48,
15.8 Hz, 2H), 6.84 (s, 4H), 3.91 (s, 12H), 3.89 (s, 6H). 13C NMR 130.34, 127.29, 125.87, 122.85, 105.57, 61.00, 56.20, 14.32.
(101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 188.48, 153.51, 143.34, 140.52, 130.29, General Procedure for the Synthesis of 13-17, 19-28, and
124.82, 105.72, 61.00, 56.25. 30-37. An amount of 1.0 mmol of 1, 2, 3, or 4 and 2 mmol of the
(5E)-3-(3,4,5-Trimethoxybenzylidene)-6-(3,4,5-trimethoxy- corresponding benzaldehyde as well as 25 mL toluene were
phenyl)hex-5-ene-2,4-dione (8). Compound 8 was synthesized in added to a three-neck rounded flask equipped with a water dis-
two steps. First the intermediate 12 was synthesized with the penser. Pyridine (4.0 mg, 0.05 mmol, in 0.1 mL toluene) and
following procedures. Acetyl acetone (5.01 g, 50 mmol), boric acetic acid (4.8 mg, 0.08 mmol, in 0.1 mL toluene) were added as
anhydride (2.1 g, 30 mmol), and tri-n-butyl borate (23 g, catalysts. The reaction mixture was stirred in 140 °C overnight,
100 mmol) were mixed in ethyl acetate (100 mL) and stirred at and the generated water was removed by water dispenser during
80 °C for 1 h. Then a solution of 3,4,5-trimethoxybenzaldehyde the whole reaction. Then the reaction mixture was washed with
(1.96 g, 10 mmol) and n-butylamine (0.5 mL) in ethyl acetate was water (10 mL, twice) to remove pyridine and acetic acid. Next
added dropwise in 1 h. Next the reaction mixture was stirred at the organic layer was evaporated under vacuum to get raw pro-
room temperature for 2 days. The resulting solution was then duct. Finally the product was purified by using silica gel column
neutralized by 0.4 N HCl and stirred for an additional 30 min in chromatography.
60 °C. Then the raw product was extracted with ethyl acetate, (1E,6E)-4-(4-Hydroxy-3-methoxybenzylidene)-1,7-bis(4-methoxy-
and the organic layer was washed with water (30 mL, 2 times), phenyl)hepta-1,6-diene-3,5-dione (13). 4-Hydroxy-3-methoxy-
dried (Na2SO4), and evaporated under vacuum. Finally the pro- benzaldehyde (304 mg, 2 mmol) and 2 (336 mg, 1 mmol) were
duct was isolated by column chromatography (petroleum ether/ used as reactants and the raw product was purified by column
acetic ether 9:1) to give 0.93 g intermediate 12 (33%). 1H NMR chromatograph (petroleum ether/acetic ether 2:1) to give 249 mg
(400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.53 (d, J=15.8 Hz, 1H), 6.77 (s, 2H), 6.39 of 13 as a yellow powder, yield 53%. HPLC tR=19.5 min; Rf=
(d, J=15.8 Hz, 1H), 5.67 (s, 1H), 3.91 (s, 6H), 3.90 (s, 3H), 2.18 0.20 (petroleum ether/acetic ether 2:1). HR-MS calcd for C29-
(s, 3H). After this, 557 mg of 12 (2 mmol) and 3,4,5-trimethox- H26O6: 470.1724, found 470.1727. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3)
ybenzaldehyde (1.18 g, 6 mmol) were dissolved in 10 mL of DMF δ 7.81 (s, 1H), 7.77 (d, J=15.4 Hz, 1H), 7.53 (d, J=16.1 Hz, 1H),
and stirred in 105 °C overnight. Then the DMF was evaporated 7.52 (d, J=8.9 Hz, 2H), 7.42 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.08 (dd, J=2.0,
under vacuum. Finally the crude mixture was purified with 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.03 (d, J=2.0 Hz, 1H), 6.99 (d, J=15.4 Hz, 1H),
column chromatography (petroleum ether/acetic ether 5:1) to 6.89 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 2H), 6.86 (d, J=8.3 Hz, 1H), 6.86 (d, J=8.9
give 280 mg of 8 as a pale yellow powder, yield 31%. HPLC tR= Hz, 2H), 6.81 (d, J=16.1 Hz, 1H), 3.83 (s, 3H), 3.81 (m, 6H). 13C
11.1 min; Rf = 0.31 (petroleum ether/acetic ether 2:1). HRMS NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 198.62, 186.81, 162.15, 161.79,
calcd for C25H28O8: 456.1779, found 456.1780. 1H NMR (400 148.14, 146.64, 146.54, 144.48, 140.79, 138.69, 130.49, 130.42,
MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.64 (s, 1H), 7.40 (d, J = 16.1 Hz, 1H), 6.75 127.62, 126.90, 125.97, 125.75, 125.42, 120.11, 114.82, 114.50,
(d, J=16.1 Hz, 1H), 6.71 (s, 2H), 6.68 (s, 2H), 3.87 (s, 3H), 3.85 114.39, 112.45, 55.94, 55.41.
(s, 6H), 3.84 (s, 3H), 3.79 (s, 6H), 2.41 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 (1E,6E)-4-(3,4-Dimethoxybenzylidene)-1,7-bis(4-methoxyphenyl)-
MHz, CDCl3) δ 197.82, 195.75, 153.48, 153.19, 146.41, 141.04, hepta-1,6-diene-3,5-dione (14). 3,4-Dimethoxybenzaldehyde
140.97, 140.36, 139.37, 129.35, 128.23, 126.27, 107.92, 105.91, (332 mg, 2 mmol) and 2 (336 mg, 1 mmol) were used as reactants
60.96, 60.90, 56.20, 56.14, 27.30. and the raw product was purified by column chromatography
8268 Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2010, Vol. 53, No. 23 Qiu et al.
(petroleum ether/acetic ether 4:1) to give 312 mg of 14 as a yellow chromatography (petroleum ether/acetic ether 2:1) to give
powder, yield 64%. HPLC tR =27.3 min; Rf =0.33 (petroleum 258 mg of 19 as a red powder, yield 49%. HPLC tR =18.1 min;
ether/acetic ether 2:1). HR-MS calcd for C30H28O6: 484.1880, Rf =0.39 (petroleum ether/acetic ether 1:1). HR-MS calcd for
found 484.1886. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.82 (s, 1H), 7.78 C32H33O6N1: 527.2302, found 527.2301. 1H NMR (500 MHz,
(d, J=15.4 Hz, 1H), 7.53 (d, J=8.9 Hz, 2H), 7.53 (d, J=15.4 Hz, CDCl3) δ 7.73 (d, J=15.4 Hz, 1H), 7.52 (d, J=16.0 Hz, 1H), 7.42
1H), 7.43 (d, J=8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.13 (dd, J=8.4, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.04 (d, J=8.9 Hz, 2H), 7.17 (dd, J=8.4, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.07 (dd, J=
(d, J=1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.99 (d, J=15.4 Hz, 1H), 6.89 (d, J=8.7 Hz, 8.5, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 7.06 (d, J=1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.00 (d, J=1.9 Hz, 1H),
2H), 6.86 (d, J=8.9 Hz, 2H), 6.83 (d, J=16.1 Hz, 1H), 6.82 (d, J= 6.99 (d, J=15.4 Hz, 1H), 6.84 (d, J=8.5 Hz, 1H), 6.85 (d, J=
8.4 Hz, 1H), 3.87 (s, 3H), 3.84 (s, 3H), 3.82 - 3.81 (m, 6H). 13C 16.0 Hz, 1H), 6.81 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 6.61 (d, J=8.9 Hz, 2H),
NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 198.73, 186.73, 162.13, 161.77, 151.09, 3.90 (s, 3H), 3.90 (s, 3H), 3.88 (s, 3H), 3.86 (s, 3H), 2.99 (s, 6H).
148.81, 146.81, 144.57, 140.65, 138.80, 130.53, 130.47, 127.52, 13
C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 199.52, 186.63, 151.80, 151.69,
126.79, 126.31, 125.35, 125.05, 119.95, 114.47, 114.35, 112.82, 151.33, 149.23, 149.20, 146.50, 143.88, 142.14, 135.43, 133.08,
111.02, 55.90, 55.82, 55.43, 55.40. 128.14, 127.43, 126.16, 123.47, 123.05, 120.87, 120.72, 111.66,
(1E,6E)-1,7-Bis(4-methoxyphenyl)-4-(2,3,4-trimethoxybenzy- 111.15, 111.06, 110.62, 110.28, 56.06, 56.02, 56.01, 55.93, 39.97.
lidene)hepta-1,6-diene-3,5-dione (15). 3,4,5-Trimethoxybenzal- (1E,6E)-1,7-Bis(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-4-(3-fluorobenzylidene)-
dehyde (392 mg, 2 mmol) and 2 (336 mg, 1 mmol) were used hepta-1,6-diene-3,5-dione (20). 3-Fluorobenzaldehyde (248 mg,
as reactants and the raw product was purified by column chro- 2 mmol) and 3 (396 mg, 1 mmol) were used as reactants and the
matography (petroleum ether/acetic ether 4:1) to give 283 mg of raw product was purified by column chromatography (petro-
15 as a yellow powder, yield 55%. HPLC tR=32.0 min; Rf=0.39 leum ether/acetic ether 3:1) to give 413 mg of 20 as a yellow
(petroleum ether/acetic ether 2:1). HR-MS calcd for C31H30O7: powder, yield 82%. HPLC tR =22.5 min; Rf =0.36 (petroleum
514.1986, found 514.1987. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.78 ether/acetic ether 3:2). HR-MS calcd for C30H27O6F1: 502.1786,
(d, J=15.4 Hz, 1H), 7.76 (s, 1H), 7.53 (d, J=8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.53 (d, found 502.1785. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.80 (d, J =
J=16.1 Hz, 1H), 7.43 (d, J=8.7 Hz, 2H), 6.98 (d, J=15.4 Hz, 15.4 Hz, 1H), 7.78 (s, 1H), 7.46 (d, J = 16.2 Hz, 1H), 7.30 (dd,
1H), 6.90 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 2H), 6.87 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 2H), 6.81 (d, J= J =8.0, 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.29 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.21 (d, J =
16.1 Hz, 1H), 6.76 (s, 2H), 3.84 (m, 6H), 3.82 (s, 3H), 3.80 (s, 6H). 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.19 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.10-7.04 (m, 2H), 7.03
13
C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 198.24, 186.77, 162.23, 161.89, (dd, J = 8.3 Hz, J =1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.99 (s, 1H), 6.95 (d, J = 15.4
153.13, 146.82, 144.94, 140.46, 140.28, 140.10, 130.54, 128.87, Hz, 1H), 6.87 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 6.84 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 6.80
127.47, 126.76, 125.26, 119.88, 114.54, 114.41, 107.92, 60.93, (d, J = 16.2 Hz, 1H), 3.92 (s, 6H), 3.90 (s, 3H), 3.88 (s, 3H). 13C
56.14, 55.45, 55.43. NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 197.47, 186.74, 162.68 (d, J =
(1E,6E)-1,7-Bis(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-4-(3,4,5-trimethoxyben- 247.2 Hz), 152.09, 151.83, 149.29, 149.24, 147.83, 145.92,
zylidene)hepta-1,6-diene-3,5-dione (16). 3,4,5-Trimethoxyben- 141.94, 138.75, 135.71 (d, J = 7.9 Hz), 130.39 (d, J = 8.3 Hz),
zaldehyde (392 mg, 2 mmol) and 3 (396 mg, 1 mmol) were used 127.54, 126.89, 126.06 (d, J = 2.9 Hz), 125.40, 123.85, 123.62,
as reactants and the raw product was purified by column chro- 119.84, 117.16 (d, J=21.4 Hz), 116.60 (d, J=22.3 Hz), 111.10,
matography (petroleum ether/acetic ether 2:1) to give 486 mg of 111.04, 110.54, 110.04, 56.05, 56.04, 55.93.
16 as a yellow powder, yield 85%. HPLC tR=17.0 min; Rf=0.39 (1E,6E)-1,7-Bis(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-4-(4-fluorobenzylidene)-
(petroleum ether/acetic ether 1:1). HR-MS calcd for C33H34O9: hepta-1,6-diene-3,5-dione (21). 4-Fluorobenzaldehyde (248 mg,
574.2197, found 574.2201. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.75 2 mmol) and 3 (396 mg, 1 mmol) were used as reactants and the
(s, 1H), 7.76 (d, J=15.4 Hz, 1H), 7.51 (d, J=16.1 Hz, 1H), 7.18 raw product was purified by column chromatography (petro-
(dd, J=8.4, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.07 (d, J=2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.05 (dd, J= leum ether/acetic ether 3:1) to give 390 mg of 21 as a yellow
8.4, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 6.98 (d, J=2.0 Hz, 1H), 6.98 (d, J=15.4 Hz, powder, yield 78%. HPLC tR =21.9 min; Rf =0.33 (petroleum
1H), 6.86 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 6.82 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 6.80 (d, J= ether/acetic ether 3:2). HR-MS calcd for C30H27O6F1: 502.1786,
16.1 Hz, 1H), 6.76 (s, 2H) 3.90 (s, 3H), 3.89(s, 3H), 3.88(s, 3H), found 502.1789. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.81 (s, 1H),
3.86 (s, 3H), 3.84 (s, 3H), 3.78 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, 7.78 (d, J = 15.4 Hz, 1H), 7.48-7.51 (m, 2H), 7.47 (d, J = 16.2 Hz,
CDCl3) δ 197.96, 186.86, 153.18, 152.10, 151.78, 149.42, 149.33, 1H), 7.19 (dd, J = 8.4, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.05-7.06 (m, 2H), 7.03 (d,
146.96, 145.23, 140.46, 140.40, 140.27, 128.84, 127.77, 127.07, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 7.01 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 6.99 (d, J = 2.0 Hz,
125.48, 123.56, 123.37, 120.21, 111.24, 110.76, 110.33, 108.02, 1H), 6.96 (d, J = 15.4 Hz, 1H), 6.87 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 6.83 (d,
60.89, 56.17, 56.02, 55.97. J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 6.80 (d, J = 16.2 Hz, 1H), 3.92 (s, 3H), 3.91 (s,
(1E,6E)-1,7-Bis(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-4-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxy- 3H), 3.89 (s, 3H), 3.88 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3)
benzylidene)hepta-1,6-diene-3,5-dione (17). 4-Hydroxy-3-meth- δ 197.92, 186.76, 163.73 (d, J=252.5 Hz), 152.09, 151.77, 149.32,
oxybenzaldehyde (304 mg, 2 mmol) and 3 (396 mg, 1 mmol) were 149.25, 147.63, 145.59, 140.57, 139.18, 132.38 (d, J = 8.6 Hz),
used as reactants and the raw product was purified by column 129.79 (d, J = 3.3 Hz), 127.63, 126.93, 125.43, 123.79, 123.52,
chromatography (petroleum ether/acetic ether 2:1) to give 320 mg 119.97, 116.07 (d, J=21.9 Hz), 111.12, 111.07, 110.58, 110.09,
of 17 as a yellow powder, yield 60%. HPLC tR=11.6 min; Rf= 56.06, 56.04, 55.94.
0.27 (petroleum ether/acetic ether 1:1). HR-MS calcd for C31- (1E,6E)-1,7-Bis(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-4-(4-hydroxybenzylidene)-
H30O8: 530.1935, found 530.1941. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) hepta-1,6-diene-3,5-dione (22). 4-Hydroxybenzaldehyde (244 mg,
δ 7.80 (s, 1H), 7.75 (d, J=15.4 Hz, 1H), 7.50 (d, J=16.1 Hz, 1H), 2 mmol) and 3 (396 mg, 1 mmol) were used as reactants and the
7.18 (dd, J=8.5, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.09 (dd, J=8.5, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.06 raw product was purified by column chromatography (petroleum
(dd, J=8.0, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.06 (d, J=2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.04 (d, J= ether/acetic ether 2:1) to give 187 mg of 22 as an orange powder,
2.0 Hz, 1H), 6.98 (d, J=2.0 Hz, 1H), 6.97 (d, J=15.4 Hz, 1H), yield 37%. HPLC tR=11.6 min; Rf=0.30 (petroleum ether/acetic
6.87 (d, J=8.5 Hz, 1H), 6.86 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.82 (d, J= ether 1:1). HR-MS calcd for C30H28O7: 500.1830, found 500.1826.
8.5 Hz, 1H), 6.81 (d, J=16.1 Hz, 1H), 3.91 (m, 6H), 3.89 (s, 3H), 1
H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ 7.76 (d, J = 15.4 Hz, 1H), 7.50
3.87 (s, 3H), 3.83 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 198.61, (d, J = 16.1 Hz, 1H), 7.39 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.19 (dd, J = 8.4,
186.89, 151.96, 151.61, 149.31, 149.24, 148.17, 147.02, 146.54, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 7.06 (d, J = 1.9 Hz, 1H), 7.07 (dd, J = 8.2, 2.1 Hz,
144.92, 140.96, 138.58, 127.81, 127.09, 125.90, 125.71, 125.57, 1H), 7.00 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H), 6.97 (d, J = 15.4 Hz, 1H), 6.86 (d,
123.60, 123.31, 120.20, 114.84, 112.42, 111.15, 111.12, 110.61, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 6.83 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 6.83 (d, J = 16.1 Hz,
110.19, 56.04, 56.03, 56.01, 55.94. 1H), 6.78 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 3.92 (s, 3H), 3.91 (s, 3H), 3.89 (s,
(1E,6E)-1,7-Bis(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-4-(4-(dimethylamino)- 3H), 3.87 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO) δ 198.22, 187.83,
benzylidene)hepta-1,6-diene-3,5-dione (19). 4-(Dimethylamino)- 159.85, 151.39, 151.14, 148.95, 148.93, 145.93, 143.26, 140.22,
benzaldehyde (298 mg, 2 mmol) and 3 (396 mg, 1 mmol) were 137.93, 132.55, 127.48, 126.78, 125.42, 124.23, 123.51, 123.29,
used as reactants and the raw product was purified by column 119.29, 115.81, 111.62, 111.49, 111.16, 110.68, 55.71, 55.54.
Article Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2010, Vol. 53, No. 23 8269
(s, 1H), 6.39 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 5.89 (m, 2H), 3.93 (s, 3H), 3.88 J=8.3, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.06 (d, J=1.5 Hz, 1H), 6.98 (dd, J=8.2,
(s, 3H), 3.87 (s, 3H), 3.79 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.5 Hz, 1H), 6.98 (d, J=15.5 Hz, 1H), 6.97 (d, J=1.5 Hz, 1H),
198.45, 187.61, 163.15, 159.85, 148.55, 148.24, 146.76, 146.72, 6.88-6.96 (m, 4H), 6.86 (d, J=8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.70 (d, J=16.1 Hz,
146.41, 144.56, 138.37, 136.21, 131.77, 127.56, 126.97, 125.46, 1H), 5.92 (s, 1H), 5.90 (s, 1H), 3.93 (s, 3H), 3.92 (s, 3H), 3.88
123.87, 123.37, 120.34, 115.82, 114.79, 114.75, 110.36, 109.81, (s, 3H), 3.84 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 197.56,
105.15, 98.28, 56.05, 55.95, 55.53, 55.43. 187.64, 152.67, 148.72, 148.54, 148.29, 147.05, 146.81, 145.46,
(1E,6E)-4-(3-Fluorobenzylidene)-1,7-bis(4-hydroxy-3-methoxy- 141.56, 136.00, 128.25, 127.30, 126.76, 125.45, 124.11, 123.95,
phenyl)hepta-1,6-diene-3,5-dione (32). 3-Fluorobenzaldehyde 123.73, 121.82, 120.01, 114.86, 114.80, 114.35, 110.26, 109.81,
(248 mg, 2 mmol) and 1 (368 mg, 1 mmol) were used as reactants, 61.37, 56.04, 55.93, 55.83.
and column chromatography (petroleum ether/acetic ether (1E,6E)-1,7-Bis(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-4-(3-methoxy-
3:1) gave 329 mg of 32 as a yellow powder, yield 69%. HPLC benzylidene)hepta-1,6-diene-3,5-dione (36). 3-Methoxybenzalde-
tR = 12.2 min; Rf = 0.32 (petroleum ether/acetic ether 1:1). hyde (272 mg, 2 mmol) and 1 (368 mg, 1 mmol) were used as
HR-MS calcd for C28H23O6F1: 474.1473, found 474.1476. 1H reactants, and column chromatography (petroleum ether/acetic
NMR (400 MHz, acetone) δ 7.90 (s, 1H), 7.69 (d, J = 15.5 Hz, ether 2:1) gave 285 mg of 36 as a yellow powder, 59%. HPLC
1H), 7.50 (d, J = 16.2 Hz, 1H), 7.39 (m, 2H), 7.39 (d, J = 15.5 Hz, tR=11.6 min; Rf=0.24 (petroleum ether/acetic ether 1:1). HR-
1H), 7.32 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.31 (dd, J = 8.2, 1.8 Hz, 1H), MS calcd for C29H26O7: 486.1679, found 486.1674. 1H NMR
7.28 (dd, J = 8.4, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.12-7.17 (m, 1H), 7.11 (dd, (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.81 (s, 1H), 7.76 (d, J = 15.4 Hz, 1H), 7.45
J = 8.2, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.90 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.85 (d, J = (d, J = 16.1 Hz, 1H), 7.24 (dd, J =8.0, 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.16 (dd,
16.2 Hz, 1H), 6.83 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 3.90 (s, 3H), 3.88 (s, J = 8.2, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 7.0-7.09 (m, 1H), 7.04 (d, J = 1.9 Hz, 1H),
3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, acetone) δ 197.59, 188.25, 163.48 7.02-7.03 (m, 1H), 7.02 (dd, J = 8.2, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 6.96 (d, J =
(d, J = 244.6 Hz), 150.86, 150.62, 148.83, 148.77, 148.08, 15.4 Hz, 1H), 6.95 (d, J = 1.9 Hz, 1H), 6.91 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H),
145.78, 143.93, 138.30, 137.46 (d, J=7.9 Hz), 131.54 (d, J= 6.87-6.89 (m, 1H), 6.87 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.77 (d, J = 16.1
8.4 Hz), 127.86, 127.33, 127.00 (d, J=2.8 Hz), 125.68, 124.95, Hz, 1H), 5.97 (s, 2H), 3.92 (s, 3H), 3.88 (s, 3H), 3.76 (s, 3H). 13C
124.35, 119.85, 117.47 (d, J=21.4 Hz), 117.00 (d, J=22.6 Hz), NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 197.92, 187.01, 159.64, 148.86,
116.31, 116.18, 112.43, 111.66, 56.42, 56.35. 148.59, 147.51, 146.80, 146.77, 145.67, 141.09, 140.31, 134.86,
(1E,6E)-4-(4-Fluorobenzylidene)-1,7-bis(4-hydroxy-3-methoxy- 129.81, 127.25, 126.64, 125.28, 124.07, 123.77, 122.80, 119.74,
phenyl)hepta-1,6-diene-3,5-dione (33). 4-Fluorobenzaldehyde 116.34, 115.15, 114.85, 114.83, 110.33, 109.90, 56.07, 55.96,
(248 mg, 2 mmol) and 1 (368 mg, 1 mmol) were used as reactants, 55.27.
and column chromatography (petroleum ether/acetic ether (1E,6E)-1,7-Bis(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-4-((5-methylfuran-2-yl)-
3:1) gave 311 mg of 33 as a yellow powder, yield 66%. HPLC methylene)hepta-1,6-diene-3,5-dione (37). 5-Methylfuran-2-car-
tR = 12.3 min; Rf = 0.31 (petroleum ether/acetic ether 1:1). baldehyde (220 mg, 2 mmol) and 3 (396 mg, 1 mmol) were used
HR-MS calcd for C28H23O6F1: 474.1473, found 474.1474. 1H as reactants and the raw product was purified by column chro-
NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.80 (s, 1H), 7.77 (d, J = 15.4 Hz, matography (petroleum ether/acetic ether 3:1) to give 276 mg of
1H), 7.50 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.48 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.45 37 as a yellow powder, yield 57%. HPLC tR=16.3 min; Rf=0.32
(d, J = 16.2 Hz, 1H), 7.16 (dd, J = 8.2, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.04 (d, (petroleum ether/acetic ether 1:1). HR-MS calcd for C29H28O7:
J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.03 (dd, J = 8.2, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.03 (d, J = 488.1830, found 488.1828. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.74
8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.01 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 6.97 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H), (d, J = 15.4 Hz, 1H), 7.60 (s, 1H), 7.46 (d, J = 16.1 Hz, 1H), 7.17
6.92 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.93 (d, J = 15.4 Hz, 1H), 6.88 (d, (dd, J = 8.4, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 7.11 (dd, J = 8.4, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 7.05 (d,
J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.77 (d, J = 16.2 Hz, 1H), 5.94 (s, 2H), 3.93 J = 1.9 Hz, 2H), 6.93 (d, J = 15.4 Hz, 1H), 6.90 (d, J = 16.1 Hz,
(s, 3H), 3.90 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, acetone) δ 197.89, 1H), 6.84 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 6.72 (d, J = 3.4 Hz, 1H), 6.08 (dq,
188.22, 164.33 (d, J = 249.7 Hz), 150.76, 150.49, 148.78, J = 3.4, 0.9 Hz, 1H), 3.89-3.90 (m, 12H), 2.26 (d, J = 0.9 Hz,
148.73, 147.77, 145.41, 142.61, 138.69, 133.26 (d, J = 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 197.53, 185.99, 157.42,
8.7 Hz), 131.51 (d, J = 3.1 Hz), 127.89, 127.35, 125.74, 151.68, 151.55, 149.31, 149.22, 148.45, 146.25, 144.64, 134.83,
124.81, 124.23, 119.89, 116.58 (d, J = 21.9 Hz), 116.27, 127.86, 127.39, 126.67, 126.25, 123.30, 123.25, 120.24, 120.16,
116.15, 112.36, 111.63, 56.38, 56.31 111.13, 110.60, 110.21, 109.74, 56.05, 56.03, 56.00, 55.95, 13.99.
(1E,6E)-4-(4-Ethylbenzylidene)-1,7-bis(4-hydroxy-3-methoxy- General Procedures for Synthesis of 18 and 29. 3,4-Dimethox-
phenyl)hepta-1,6-diene-3,5-dione (34). 4-Ethylbenzaldehyde (268 mg, ybenzaldehyde (831 mg, 5 mmol) or 4-hydroxy-3-methoxyben-
2 mmol) and 1 (368 mg, 1 mmol) were used as reactants, and column zaldehyde (760 mg, 5 mmol) was mixed with pentane-2,4-dione
chromatography (petroleum ether/acetic ether 3:1) gave 288 mg of 34 (42 mg, 1 mmol) and 25 mL of toluene in a three-neck rounded
as a yellow powder, yield 59%. HPLC tR=16.9 min; Rf=0.36 (petro- flask equipped a water dispenser. Then pyridine (7.9 mg, 0.1 mmol,
leum ether/acetic ether 1:1). HR-MS calcd for C30H28O6: 484.1880, in 0.2 mL of toluene) and acetic acid (9.6 mg, 0.16 mmol, in
found 484.1881. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.83 (s, 1H), 7.75 (d, 0.2 mL of toluene) were added in as catalysts. The reaction mix-
J = 15.4 Hz, 1H), 7.47 (d, J = 16.2 Hz, 1H), 7.42 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, ture was stirred at 140 °C overnight, and the generated water was
2H), 7.13-7.16 (m, 3H), 7.03 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.01 (dd, J = 8.2, removed by water dispenser during the whole reaction. After the
1.6 Hz, 1H), 6.97 (d, J = 1.6 Hz,1H), 6.96 (d, J = 15.4 Hz, 1H), 6.91 mixture was washed with water to remove pyridine and acetic
(d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.87 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.80 (d, J = 16.2 Hz, acid, the solvent was evaporated to get raw product. Finally the
1H), 3.91 (s, 3H), 3.87 (s, 3H), 2.61 (q, J = 7.56 Hz, 2H), 1.19 (t, J = raw product was purified by column chromatography to give
7.59 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 198.43, 187.03, 148.84, 18 and 29, respectively.
148.54, 147.51, 147.16, 146.82, 146.79, 145.39, 140.69, 139.77, 130.86, (1E,6E)-4-(3,4-Dimethoxybenzylidene)-1,7-bis(3,4-dimethoxy-
130.61, 128.40, 127.28, 126.66, 125.38, 124.03, 123.67, 119.77, 114.86, phenyl)hepta-1,6-diene-3,5-dione (18). Column chromatography
114.83, 110.36, 109.97, 56.06, 55.95, 28.75, 15.10. (petroleum ether/acetic ether 3:2) gave 381 mg of 18 as a yellow
(1E,6E)-4-(2,3-Dimethoxybenzylidene)-1,7-bis(4-hydroxy-3- powder, yield 70%. HPLC tR =15.7 min; Rf =0.28 (petroleum
methoxyphenyl)hepta-1,6-diene-3,5-dione (35). 2,3-Dimethoxy- ether/acetic ether 1:1). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.80 (s,
benzaldehyde (332 mg, 2 mmol) and 1 (368 mg, 1 mmol) were 1H), 7.75 (d, J=15.4 Hz, 1H), 7.51 (d, J=16.1 Hz, 1H), 7.18 (dd,
used as reactants, and column chromatography (petroleum ether/ J=8.4, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.13 (dd, J=8.4, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.05-7.06
acetic ether 2:1) gave 180 mg of 35 as a yellow powder, yield (m, 3H), 6.98 (d, J=2.0 Hz, 1H), 6.99 (d, J=15.4 Hz, 1H), 6.85
35%. HPLC tR = 18.8 min; Rf = 0.24 (petroleum ether/acetic (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 6.81 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 2H), 6.81 (d, J=16.1 Hz,
ether 1:1). HR-MS calcd for C30H28O8 [M - H]-: 515.1706, 1H), 3.89 (s, 6H), 3.87 (s, 3H), 3.86 (s, 6H), 3.80 (s, 3H). 13C
found 515.1696. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.13 (s, 1H), NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 198.39, 186.84, 152.01, 151.66,
7.75 (d, J=15.5 Hz, 1H), 7.41 (d, J= 16.1 Hz, 1H), 7.16 (dd, 151.21, 149.37, 149.30, 148.95, 146.90, 144.88, 140.65, 139.00,
Article Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2010, Vol. 53, No. 23 8271
127.86, 127.14, 126.39, 125.61, 124.98, 123.54, 123.27, 120.29, viability with Thermo Scientific’s Multiskan MK3 plate reader to
112.99, 111.24, 111.19, 111.16, 110.75, 110.33, 56.05, 56.01, obtain the GI50 values.
55.94, 55.90, 55.87. Alamar Blue Method. Cells were maintained in RPMI with
(1E,6E)-4-(4-Hydroxy-3-methoxybenzylidene)-1,7-bis(4-hy- 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and penicillin/streptomycin in a
droxy-3-methoxyphenyl)hepta-1,6-diene-3,5-dione (29). Column 37 °C incubator with 5% CO2. Cells were plated in 384-well
chromatography (petroleum ether/acetic ether 2:3) gave 223 mg plates and were treated with test agents on the following day and
of 29 as a yellow powder, yield 44%. HPLC tR =7.9 min; Rf = further incubated for 72 h before the viability assay was carried
0.39 (petroleum ether/acetic ether 1:2). HR-MS calcd for C29- out. The Alamar Blue assay was performed to evaluate cell via-
H26O8: 502.1628, found 502.1623. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) bility with PerkinElmer’s EnVision multimode plate reader to
δ 7.80 (s, 1H), 7.75 (d, J = 15.4 Hz, 1H), 7.49 (d, J = 16.1 Hz, obtain the GI50 values.42,43 The GI50 is defined as the concen-
1H), 7.16 (dd, J = 8.2, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 7.09 (dd, J = 8.3, 1.8 Hz, tration of agents that decreases viability by 50% in a total cell
1H), 7.04 (m, 2H), 7.03 (dd, J = 8.2, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.96 (d, J = 1.7 population compared to control cells with solvent vehicle at the
Hz, 1H), 6.95 (d, J = 15.4 Hz, 1H), 6.91 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.88 end of the incubation period.
(d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.87 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 6.80 (d, J = NF-KB Translocation Assay. In brief, A549 cell were seeded in
16.1 Hz, 1H), 5.95 (s, 1H), 5.93 (s, 1H), 5.89 (s, 1H), 3.92 (s, 3H), 384-well plates, incubated for 15 h, then incubated with various
3.89 (s, 3H), 3.83 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, acetone) δ concentrations of compounds for 30 min. TNF-R (10 ng/mL,
198.90, 188.17, 150.69, 150.37, 150.05, 148.84, 148.77, 148.37, final) was added to cells to stimulate the NF-κB cell signaling
147.20, 144.77, 140.74, 140.11, 128.05, 127.48, 126.61, 126.13, pathway for 30 min. Cells were then fixed with paraformalde-
126.01, 124.64, 124.05, 120.15, 116.31, 116.25, 116.23, 114.39, hyde (2%, 100 μL) and permeabilized with Triton X-100 (0.1%,
112.38, 111.75, 56.43, 56.35, 56.25. 100 μL). Finally, rabbit anti-p65 NF-κB antibody and goat anti-
General Procedures for the Synthesis of 38-40. Triethoxy- rabbit IgG with conjugated Alexa Fluor 488 were used to stain
methane (1.48 g, 10 mmol) and 1 mmol of corresponding sym- NF-κB, and Hoechst 33342 was used to stain nucleus. Fluores-
metrical curcuminoids were dissolved in 5 mL of acetic anhy- cence intensity of NF-κB and nuclear staining were recorded
dride. The reaction mixture was stirred at 140 °C for 5 h and then with an automated imaging system, ImageXpress5000A (Molecular
transferred to room temperature, and 10 mL of H2O was added Devices). The levels of NF-κB translocation were calculated and
for an additional 10 min. The raw product was extracted by ethyl expressed as the difference between average fluorescence inten-
acetate and then purified by column chromatography or recrys- sity in the nucleus and in the cytoplasm. After stimulation with
tallization. TNF-R, the inhibitory effect of test compounds on TNFR in-
4,40 -((1E,6E)-4-(Hydroxymethylene)-3,5-dioxohepta-1,6-diene- duced NF-κB translocation was expressed as a percentage of
1,7-diyl)bis(2-methoxy-4,1-phenylene) Diacetate (38). 1 (368 mg, fluorescence intensity difference (in nucleus and in cytoplasm) in
1 mmol) was used as reactant and the raw product was purified the control wells (TNFR only) after subtracting background (no
by column chromatography (petroleum ether/acetic ether 4:1) TNFR treatment). The IC50 of test compounds in this NF-κB
to give 140 mg of 38 as a yellow powder, yield 29%. HPLC tR= translocation assay stands for the concentration of a compound
10.4 min; Rf =0.44 (petroleum ether/acetic ether 3:2). HR-MS required to induce 50% inhibition. All data are obtained as
calcd for C26H24O9: 480.1415, found 480.1409. 1H NMR average values from triplicate samples, and the experiments
(400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.35 (s, 1H), 7.93 (d, J=15.5 Hz, 2H), were repeated at least three times.
7.76 (d, J = 15.5 Hz, 2H), 7.27 (dd, J = 8.2, 1.6 Hz, 2H), 7.21 Clonogenic Assay. A549 cells were plated in low density in a
(d, J=1.6 Hz, 2H), 7.10 (d, J=8.2 Hz, 2H), 3.91 (s, 6H), 2.34 (s, 12-well plate and treated with test compounds the following day
6H). 13C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 189.36, 186.95, 168.67, and every 3 days thereafter. On day 9 after colonies were formed,
151.55, 145.09, 142.17, 133.63, 123.44, 122.18, 120.47, 112.77, cells were fixed with trichloroacetic acid (TCA) (10%) for 30 min
111.94, 56.03, 20.67. at 4 °C, washed with water, stained with SRB, and then washed
(1E,6E)-4-(Hydroxymethylene)-1,7-bis(4-methoxyphenyl)- with acetic acid (1%). The images of the plate were scanned, and
hepta-1,6-diene-3,5-dione (39). 2 (336 mg, 1 mmol) was used as colonies were counted using image processing and analysis in
reactant and the raw product was purified by column chroma- Java (Image J, Research Service Branch, NIH).
tography (petroleum ether/acetic ether 9:1) to give 255 mg of 39 IKK Assays. Cell Based IKK Assay. Cells were treated with
as a yellow powder, yield 70%. HPLC tR =9.9 min; Rf =0.37 various test agents for a defined period of time as described in
(petroleum ether/acetic ether 3:1). HR-MS calcd for C22H20O5: each figure and were lysed for detection of phosphorylation
364.1305, found 364.1292. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.35 status of IκB, a readout for IKK activity, and total IκB protein.
(s, 1H), 7.94 (d, J = 15.4 Hz, 2H), 7.72 (d, J = 15.4 Hz, 2H), 7.61 The NP-40 lysates buffer was used (1.0% NP-40, 10 mM Hepes,
(d, J = 8.2 Hz, 4H), 6.94 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 4H), 3.87 (s, 6H). 13C pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM NaF, 2 mM Na3VO4, 5 mM Na4-
NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 189.48, 187.14, 162.15, 145.44, P2O7, 10 μg/mL aprotinin, 10 μg/mL leupeptin, 1 mM PMSF).
130.79, 127.60, 117.94, 114.54, 55.46. For Western blotting, equal volumes of cell lysate were subject
(1E,6E)-1,7-Bis(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-4-(hydroxymethylene)- to electrophoresis on SDS-PAGE (12.5%). Proteins were then
hepta-1,6-diene-3,5-dione (40). 3 (396 mg, 1 mmol) was used as electrotransferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (GE Water
reactant and the raw product was purified by recrystallization in and Process Technologies, Trevose, PA) as described previ-
acetic anhydride to give 273 mg of 40 as an orange powder, yield ously.44 Membranes were blocked in a solution of 5% nonfat
64%. HPLC tR = 14.6 min; Rf = 0.40 (petroleum ether/acetic dry milk in TBS-T buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 7.6, 500 mM NaCl,
ether 3:2). HR-MS calcd for C24H24O7, 424.1517; found, 0.5% Tween-20) for 30 min followed by incubation with anti-
424.1518. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.37 (s, 1H), 7.93 pS32-I-κB or I-κB antibodies from Cell Signaling (Beverly,
(d, J = 15.4 Hz, 2H), 7.71 (d, J = 15.4 Hz, 2H), 7.26 (d, J = MA) for at least 2 h. The membrane was then washed and treat-
8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.17 (s, 2H), 6.91 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 3.97 (s, 6H), ed with the corresponding horseradish peroxidase conjugated
3.95 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 189.39, 187.23, anti-mouse immunoglobulin [Ig] or anti-rabbit Ig as indicated.
151.98, 149.35, 145.80, 127.83, 124.03, 118.04, 111.12, 110.26, Immunodetection was performed using West Pico (Pierce,
56.04, 56.01. Rockford, IL) or West Dura (Pierce) followed by imaging on
Biology. Cell Viability Assay. Sulforhodamine B (SRB) Method. Kodak’s Image Station 2000R (New Haven, CT).
Cells were maintained in RPMI with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS) In Vitro IKK Assay. Activated recombinant IKKβ in MOPS
and penicillin/streptomycin in a 37 °C incubator with 5% CO2. Cells buffer (8 mM MOPS-NaOH, pH 7.0, 200 μM EDTA, 15 mM
were plated in 96-well plates and were treated with test agents on the MgCl2) from Upstate Cell Signaling Solutions (Lake Placid, NY)
following day and further incubated for 48 h before viability assay was used for the in vitro kinase assay. The test compounds were
was carried out. The SRB assay was performed to evaluate cell incubated with IKKβ (40 ng) for 30 min at room temperature.
8272 Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2010, Vol. 53, No. 23 Qiu et al.
The addition of Mg-ATP mix (15 mM MgCl2, 100 μM ATP, (3) Bonizzi, G.; Karin, M. The two NF-κB activation pathways and
8 mM MOPS-NaOH, pH 7.0, 5 mM β-glycerophosphate, 1 mM their role in innate and adaptive immunity. Trends Immunol. 2004,
EGTA, 200 nM sodium orthovanadate, 200 nM DTT), purified 25, 280–288.
(4) Shukla, S.; MacLennan, G.; Fu, P.; Patel, J.; Marengo, S.; Resnick,
GST- I-κBR (5 μg), and [γ-32P]ATP (0.5 μCi) in a final volume of M.; Gupta, S. Nuclear factor-nB/p65 (Rel A) is constitutively
25 μL started the reaction, which was allowed to proceed at activated in human prostate adenocarcinoma and correlates with
30 °C for 30 min. Reactions were terminated by boiling the disease progression. Neoplasia 2004, 6, 390–400.
kinase reaction solution in a 6 SDS sample buffer for 5 min. (5) Ni, H.; Ergin, M.; Huang, Q.; Qin, J.; Amin, H.; Martinez, R.;
The samples were resolved on SDS-PAGE (12.5%). The gel Saeed, S.; Barton, K.; Alkan, S. Analysis of expression of nuclear
was stained with Coomassie Blue dye (0.05%). 32P incorpora- factor κB (NF-κB) in multiple myeloma: downregulation of NF-κB
induces apoptosis. Br. J. Haematol. 2001, 115, 279–286.
tion into GST-I-κBR was assessed by autoradiography. In ad- (6) Guzman, M.; Neering, S.; Upchurch, D.; Grimes, B.; Howard, D.;
dition, the radiolabeled GST-I-κBR protein bands were excised Rizzieri, D.; Luger, S.; Jordan, C. Nuclear factor-κB is constitu-
for quantification with a scintillation counter (Beckman LS 6500, tively activated in primitive human acute myelogenous leukemia
Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA). cells. Blood 2001, 98, 2301–2037.
Molecular Modeling. Homology Model Building. IKKβ cat- (7) Tang, X.; Shishodia, S.; Behrens, C.; Hong, W.; Wistuba, I. Nuclear
alytic domain sequence (code O14920) was collected from UniProt factor-κB (NF-κB) is frequently expressed in lung cancer and pre-
neoplastic lesions. Cancer 2006, 107, 2637–2646.
(http://www.uniprot.org/), and C terminal amino acid residues (8) Huang, S.; DeGuzman, A.; Bucana, C.; Fidler, I. Nuclear factor-κB
after G218, which are difficult to be modeled, were deleted since activity correlates with growth, angiogenesis, and metastasis of
it is far away from ATP binding pocket. The sequence similarity human melanoma cells in nude mice. Clin. Cancer Res. 2000, 6,
search of IKKβ catalytic domain was performed using the BLAST 2573–2581.
protocol which is built in Discovery Studio 2.1 (Accelrys Inc.). (9) Farina, A.; Tacconelli, A.; Vacca, A.; Maroder, M.; Gulino, A.;
Mackay, A. Transcriptional up-regulation of matrix metallopro-
Four templates 2JC6, 1A06, 2QNJ, and 2A2A were chosen from teinase-9 expression during spontaneous epithelial to neuroblast
Protein Data Bank (PDB). The C terminal amino acids after a phenotype conversion by SK-N-SH neuroblastoma cells, involved
conserved glycine were deleted from all the templates. The auto- in enhanced invasivity, depends upon GT-Box and nuclear factor
mated sequence alignment and analysis of template and target κB elements. Cell Growth Differ. 1999, 10, 353–367.
were carried out by Discovery Studio 2.1. (10) Wang, C.; Mayo, M.; Korneluk, R.; Goeddel, D.; Baldwin, A., Jr.
The homology modeling of the IKKβ catalytic domain was NF-B antiapoptosis: induction of TRAF1 and TRAF2 and c-IAP1
and c-IAP2 to suppress caspase-8 activation. Science 1998, 281,
carried out by using the built-in Modeler package of Discovery 1680–1683.
Studio 2.1. The four different kinase templates sequences were (11) Karin, M. Nuclear factor-κB in cancer development and progres-
aligned together with the IKKβ sequence, and this alignment sion. Nature 2006, 441, 431–436.
was supplied along with the 3D coordinates of templates as an (12) Qiao, L.; Zhang, H.; Yu, J.; Francisco, R.; Dent, P.; Ebert, M.;
input to the program. The best model given by the program was Rocken, C.; Farrell, G. Constitutive activation of NF-κB in human
chosen, and energy minimization was done by using the Powell hepatocellular carcinoma: evidence of a cytoprotective role. Hum.
Gene Ther. 2006, 17, 280–290.
method for about 1000 iterations, with Tripos force field in (13) Arlt, A.; Gehrz, A.; M€ uerk€oster, S.; Vorndamm, J.; Kruse, M.-L.;
Sybyl 7.3.5. The structural analysis was carried out with the F€olsch, U. R.; Sch€afer, H. Role of NF-κB and Akt/PI3K in the
Ramanchandran plot in Sybyl 7.3.5. resistance of pancreatic carcinoma cell lines against gemcitabine-
Small Molecular Preparation. The 3D structure of ATP was induced cell death. Oncogene 2003, 22, 3243–3251.
extracted from the crystal structures of the phosphorylase (14) Gradilone, A.; Silvestri, I.; Scarpa, S.; Morrone, S.; Gandini, O.;
Pulcinelli, F.; Gianni, W.; Frati, L.; Agliano, A.; Gazzaniga, P.
kinase (PDB code 1PHK, 28.6% sequence identity with IKKβ Failure of apoptosis and activation on NFκB by celecoxib and
catalytic domain). The geometries of compound 17 were energy aspirin in lung cancer cell lines. Oncol. Rep. 2007, 17, 823–828.
minimized using density functional theory. These calculations (15) Notarbartolo, M.; Poma, P.; Perri, D.; Dusonchet, L.; Cervello,
were performed with the B3LYP hybrid functional and the M.; D’Alessandro, N. Antitumor effects of curcumin, alone or in
6-31G basis set implemented in Gaussian 03, revision E.01, soft- combination with cisplatin or doxorubicin, on human hepatic
ware package.45 After energy minimization, it adopts a propel- cancer cells. Analysis of their possible relationship to changes in
NF-κB activation levels and in IAP gene expression. Cancer Lett.
ler-shaped conformation. 2005, 224, 53–65.
Docking. Molecular docking studies of compounds with the (16) Wang, X.; Ju, W.; Renouard, J.; Aden, J.; Minsky, S. A.; Lin, Y.
ATP binding pocket were performed with Surflex-Dock in Sybyl 17-Allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin synergistically potenti-
7.3.5. Automatic was chosen as the mode of construction for the ates tumor necrosis factor-induced lung cancer cell death by block-
protomol. Threshold is 0.5 and bloat is 0. ing the nuclear factor-κB pathway. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 1089–
1095.
Acknowledgment. We thank Mary Puckett for critical read- (17) Sarkar, F.; Li, Y. Soy isoflavones and cancer prevention. Cancer
Invest. 2003, 21, 744–757.
ing of the manuscript. This work was supported in part by grants (18) Holmes-McNary, M.; Baldwin, A., Jr. Chemopreventive proper-
from the MOST of China (863 Program 2008AA02Z304) and ties of trans-resveratrol are associated with inhibition of activation
NSFC (Grant 30973619) (X.B.) and from the U.S. National of the IκB kinase. Cancer Res. 2000, 60, 3477–3483.
Institutes of Health (Grant P01 CA116676 to H.F.) and Emory (19) Plummer, S.; Holloway, K.; Manson, M.; Munks, R.; Kaptein, A.;
Farrow, S.; Howells, L. Inhibition of cyclo-oxygenase 2 expression
Faculty Distinction Fund (H.F.). H.F. is a GCC Distin- in colon cells by the chemopreventive agent curcumin involves
guished Cancer Scholar and a GRA Distinguished Investiga- inhibition of NF-κB activation via the NIK/IKK signalling com-
tor. Y.D. is a recipient of Emory Head and Neck Cancer plex. Oncogene 1999, 18, 6013–6020.
(20) Maheshwari, R.; Singh, A.; Gaddipati, J.; Srimal, R. Multiple
SPORE Career Development Award (Grant P50 CA128613). biological activities of curcumin: a short review. Life Sci. 2006, 78,
Supporting Information Available: 1
H NMR, 13C NMR, 2081–2087.
(21) Cheng, A.; Hsu, C.; Lin, J.; Hsu, M.; Ho, Y.; Shen, T.; Ko, J.; Lin,
HRMS, and HPLC spectra; additional cancer cell growth inhibi- J.; Lin, B.; Ming-Shiang, W. Phase I clinical trial of curcumin, a
tion data and molecular modeling information. This material is chemopreventive agent, in patients with high-risk or pre-malignant
available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org. lesions. Anticancer Res. 2001, 21, 2895–2900.
(22) Singh, S.; Aggarwal, B. Activation of transcription factor NF-κB is
References suppressed by curcumin (diferuloylmethane). J. Biol. Chem. 1995,
270, 24995–25000.
(1) Ghosh, S.; May, M.; Kopp, E. NF-κB and Rel proteins: evolution- (23) Leu, T.; Maa, M. The molecular mechanisms for the antitumori-
arily conserved mediators of immune responses. Annu. Rev. Immunol. genic effect of curcumin. Curr. Med. Chem.: Anti-Cancer Agents
1998, 16, 225–260. 2002, 2, 357–370.
(2) Hayden, M.; Ghosh, S. Shared principles in NF-κB signaling. Cell (24) Milacic, V.; Banerjee, S.; Landis-Piwowar, K.; Sarkar, F.; Majumdar,
2008, 132, 344–362. A.; Dou, Q. Curcumin inhibits the proteasome activity in human
Article Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2010, Vol. 53, No. 23 8273
colon cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 7283– anti-cancer and anti-angiogenesis agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2004,
7292. 12, 3871–3883.
(25) Anand, P.; Kunnumakkara, A.; Newman, R.; Aggarwal, B. Bio- (37) Kasinski, A.; Du, Y.; Thomas, S.; Zhao, J.; Sun, S.; Khuri, F.; Wang,
availability of curcumin: problems and promises. Mol. Pharma- C.; Shoji, M.; Sun, A.; Snyder, J. Inhibition of IκB kinase-nuclear
ceutics 2007, 4, 807–818. factor-κB signaling pathway by 3,5-bis(2-flurobenzylidene)piperidin-
(26) Ohtsu, H.; Xiao, Z.; Ishida, J.; Nagai, M.; Wang, H.; Itokawa, H.; 4-one (EF24), a novel monoketone analog of curcumin. Mol. Phar-
Su, C.; Shih, C.; Chiang, T.; Chang, E. Antitumor agents. 217. macol. 2008, 74, 654.
Curcumin analogues as novel androgen receptor antagonists with (38) Aggarwal, S.; Ichikawa, H.; Takada, Y.; Sandur, S. K.; Shishodia,
potential as anti-prostate cancer agents. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, S.; Aggarwal, B. B. Curcumin (diferuloylmethane) down-regulates
5037–5042. expression of cell proliferation and antiapoptotic and metastatic
(27) Lin, L.; Shi, Q.; Nyarko, A.; Bastow, K.; Wu, C.; Su, C.; Shih, C.; gene products through suppression of IκBR kinase and Akt activa-
Lee, K. Antitumor agents. 250. Design and synthesis of new cur- tion. Mol. Pharmacol. 2006, 69, 195–206.
cumin analogs as potential anti-prostate cancer agents. J. Med. (39) Baud, V.; Karin, M. Signal transduction by tumor necrosis factor
Chem. 2006, 49, 3963–3972. and its relatives. Trends Cell Biol. 2001, 11, 372–377.
(28) Zambre, A.; Kulkarni, V.; Padhye, S.; Sandur, S.; Aggarwal, B. (40) Silverman, N.; Maniatis, T. NF-κB signaling pathways in mam-
Novel curcumin analogs and proliferation targeting TNF-induced malian and insect innate immunity. Genes Dev. 2001, 15, 2321–
NF-kappa B activation in human leukemic KBM-5 cells. Bioorg. 2342.
Med. Chem. 2006, 14, 7196–7204. (41) Shoemaker, R.; Wolpert-DeFilippes, M.; Kern, D.; Lieber, M.;
(29) Weber, W.; Hunsaker, L.; Roybal, C.; Bobrovnikova-Marjon, E.; Makuch, R.; Melnick, N.; Miller, W.; Salmon, S.; Simon, R.;
Abcouwer, S.; Royer, R.; Deck, L.; Vander Jagt, D. Activation of Venditti, J. Application of a human tumor colony-forming assay
NFκB is inhibited by curcumin and related enones. Bioorg. Med. to new drug screening. Cancer Res. 1985, 45, 2145–2153.
Chem. 2006, 14, 2450–2461. (42) Rubinstein, L. V.; Shoemaker, R. H.; Paull, K. D.; Simon, R. M.;
(30) Adams, B.; Ferstl, E.; Davis, M.; Herold, M.; Kurtkaya, S.; Tosini, S.; Skehan, P.; Scudiero, D. A.; Monks, A.; Boyd, M. R.
Camalier, R.; Hollingshead, M.; Kaur, G.; Sausville, E.; Rickles, Comparison of in vitro anticancer-drug-screening data generated
F. Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel curcumin analogs with a tetrazolium assay versus a protein assay against a diverse
as anti-cancer and anti-angiogenesis agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. panel of human tumor cell lines. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1990, 82,
2004, 12, 3871–3883. 1113–1118.
(31) Padhye, S.; Chavan, D.; Pandey, S.; Deshpande, J.; Swamy, K. V.; (43) Skehan, P.; Storeng, R.; Scudiero, D.; Monks, A.; McMahon, J.;
Sarkar, F. H. Perspectives on chemopreventive and therapeutic Vistica, D.; Warren, J. T.; Bokesch, H.; Kenney, S.; Boyd, M. R.
potential of curcumin analogs in medicinal chemistry. Mini-Rev. New colorimetric cytotoxicity assay for anticancer-drug screening.
Med. Chem. 2010, 10, 372–387. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1990, 82, 1107–1112.
(32) Padhye, S.; Yang, H.; Jamadar, A.; Cui, Q.; Chavan, D.; Dominiak, (44) Zhang, L.; Chen, J.; Fu, H. Suppression of apoptosis signal-
K.; McKinney, J.; Banerjee, S.; Dou, Q.; Sarkar, F. New difluoro regulating kinase 1-induced cell death by 14-3-3 proteins. Proc.
Knoevenagel condensates of curcumin, their schiff bases and Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96, 8511–8515.
copper complexes as proteasome inhibitors and apoptosis inducers (45) Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb,
in cancer cells. Pharm. Res. 2009, 1–7. M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Montgomery, J. A.; , Jr., Vreven, T.;
(33) Padhye, S.; Banerjee, S.; Chavan, D.; Pandye, S.; Swamy, K. V.; Kudin, K. N.; Burant, J. C.; Millam, J. M.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi,
Ali, S.; Li, J.; Dou, Q. P.; Sarkar, F. H. Fluorocurcumins as J.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Cossi, M.; Scalmani, G.; Rega, N.;
cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor: molecular docking, pharmacokinetics Petersson, G. A.; Nakatsuji, H.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.;
and tissue distribution in mice. Pharm. Res. 2009, 26, 2438–2445. Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa, J.; Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.;
(34) Ohtsu, H.; Xiao, Z.; Ishida, J.; Nagai, M.; Wang, H. K.; Itokawa, Kitao, O.; Nakai, H.; Klene, M.; Li, X.; Knox, J. E.; Hratchian,
H.; Su, C. Y.; Shih, C.; Chiang, T.; Chang, E.; Lee, Y.; Tsai, M. Y.; H. P.; Cross, J. B.; Bakken, V.; Adamo, C.; Jaramillo, J.; Gomperts,
Chang, C.; Lee, K. H. Antitumor agents. 217. Curcumin analogues R.; Stratmann, R. E.; Yazyev, O.; Austin, A. J.; Cammi, R.;
as novel androgen receptor antagonists with potential as anti- Pomelli, C.; Ochterski, J. W.; Ayala, P. Y.; Morokuma, K.; Voth,
prostate cancer agents. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 5037–5042. G. A.; Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Dapprich,
(35) Qiu, X.; Liu, Z.; Shao, W. Y.; Liu, X.; Jing, D. P.; Yu, Y. J.; An, S.; Daniels, A. D.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck,
L. K.; Huang, S. L.; Bu, X. Z.; Huang, Z. S.; Gu, L. Q. Synthesis A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Ortiz, J. V.; Cui, Q.;
and evaluation of curcumin analogues as potential thioredoxin Baboul, A. G.; Clifford, S.; Cioslowski, J.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.;
reductase inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008, 16, 8035–8041. Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.;
(36) Adams, B. K.; Ferstl, E. M.; Davis, M. C.; Herold, M.; Kurtkaya, Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.;
S.; Camalier, R. F.; Hollingshead, M. G.; Kaur, G.; Sausville, Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong,
E. A.; Rickles, F. R.; Snyder, J. P.; Liotta, D. C.; Shoji, M. M. W.; Gonzalez, C.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 03, revision E.01;
Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel curcumin analogs as Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, 2004.