Ditctab2023d1 en
Ditctab2023d1 en
Ditctab2023d1 en
STATISTICS
and TRENDS
in International Trade 2022
Geneva, 2023
Key Statistics and Trends in International Trade 2022
Requests to reproduce excerpts or to photocopy should be addressed to the Copyright Clearance Center at
copyright.com.
All other queries on rights and licences, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to:
The designations employed and the presentation of material on any map in this work do not imply the expression
of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory,
city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
Mention of any firm or licensed process does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations.
United Nations publication issued by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development
UNCTAD/DITC/TAB/2023/1
ISBN: 978-92-1-113090-4
eISBN: 978-92-1-002511-9
ISSN: 2663-7960
eISSN: 2663-7979
Sales No.: E.23.II.D.2
NOTE ........................................................................................................................................................... iv
OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................................... v
DATA SOURCES.......................................................................................................................................... vi
NOTE
Key Statistics and Trends in International Trade is a yearly publication. It is a product of the Trade Analysis
Branch, Division on International Trade and Commodities (DITC), UNCTAD secretariat. This publication monitors
the trends of international trade in goods and services in the medium term.
The series is part of a larger effort by UNCTAD to analyse trade-related issues of particular importance for
developing countries, as requested by the mandate of UNCTAD XV. Alessandro Nicita and Julia Grübler
contributed to this study, which also benefited from inputs and comments from various DITC staff members and
the UNCTAD Statistics team. Desktop publishing was done by Jenifer Tacardon-Mercado.
Trade trends during the last three years have been greatly influenced by the COVID-19 pandemic. During 2020,
the economic disruptions brought about by COVID-19 resulted in a decline of international trade in goods and
services. However, as global demand resumed, international trade strongly rebounded in 2021 and further
increased during 2022. Overall, the value of global trade is expected to be about 25 per cent higher in 2022 than
it was in 2019. A substantial part of the increase in the value of trade during the last two years can be explained
by rising commodity prices and more recently by general inflation. Trade volumes grew to a smaller extent. Even
so, the steady increase in the volume of international trade since early 2021 indicates a robust global demand
for traded goods.
This report is structured into two parts. The first part presents a short-term overview of the status of international
trade using preliminary statistics on merchandise trade until the first half of 2022. The second part provides
illustrative statistics on international trade in goods and services covering the medium term. The second part
is divided into two sections. Section 1 provides trade statistics at various levels of aggregation that illustrates
the evolution of trade across economic sectors and geographic regions. Section 2 presents trade indicators to
inform on some specifics of the trade patterns at the country level.
DATA SOURCES
The statistics in this publication were produced by the UNCTAD secretariat using data from various sources.
This report relies on the United Nations Commodity Trade Statistics Database (COMTRADE) (comtrade.un.org)
data for merchandise trade statistics. UNCTADStat (unctadstat.unctad.org) is the source of service statistics.
Quarterly data for merchandise trade comes from national authorities’ statistics. The data has been standardized
to facilitate cross-country comparisons. Data, although comprehensive and comparable across countries, does
not perfectly reflect national statistics, and thus some discrepancies with specific national statistics may be
present. Unless otherwise specified international trade is defined as trade in goods (merchandise) and services.
Countries are categorized by geographic region as defined by the United Nations classification (UNSD M49).
Developed countries are these identified in the UNSD M49 according to the distinction as of December 2021.
Product sectors are categorized according to the Broad Economic Categories (BEC) classification and the
International Standard Industrial Classification (ISIC) augmented by five broad agricultural sectors based on the
Harmonized System (HS) classification. Figures are in current United States of America dollars, except where
otherwise specified.
20
−20
−40
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Source: UNCTAD secretariat calculations based on data from UNCTADStat, UN Comtrade and National Statistics.
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
demand resumed, trade increased by $5.5 trillion in 2021 to reach about $28 trillion. The value of international
trade is expected to reach around US$ 32 trillion by the end of 2022, an increase of roughly 26 per cent relative
to the pre-pandemic levels of 2019. Importantly, the growth of global trade during the last two years has strongly
outpaced the growth of the global economy. Consequently, the ratio of global exports over global output jumped
from 29 per cent in 2019 to about 32 per cent in 2021. Given the continuing growth in global trade during the
first half of 2022, this ratio is expected to reach a record of about 34 per cent in 2022.
Many of the international trade trends of the last three years can be explained by changes in patterns of global
demand. Lockdown measures caused a decline of demand in many sectors. Moreover, due to restrictions in the
movement of people, demand declined much more
sharply in the services sector. On the other hand,
manufacturing trade proved to be more resilient as a Trade recovery
result of the increased demand for pharmaceuticals
Goods value Goods volumes Services
and personal protective equipment, as well as for
30
−50
2019 2020 2021 2022
100
50
-50
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2
2019 2020 2021 2022 2019 2020 2021 2022
Source: UNCTAD secretariat calculations based on data from UNCTADStat, UN Comtrade and National Statistics.
In 2021, world trade in goods was valued above US$22 trillion, while trade in services accounted for
about US$5.6 trillion. Global trade has been severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 but
bounced back strongly in 2021. While trade in services has been historically more resilient, it has
declined considerably more than goods trade during 2020 and has also been recovering at a slower
pace since.
Figure 1
Values and growth rates of world trade in goods and services
(a) (b)
20
20
15
US$ Trillion
Percentage
0
10
−20
5
0 −40
2005 2010 2015 2020 2005 2010 2015 2020
International trade can be broadly distinguished between trade in goods (merchandise) and services. The bulk
of international trade concerns physical goods, while services account for a much lower share. World trade in
goods has increased dramatically over the last decade, rising from about US$10 trillion in 2005 to more than
US$18.5 trillion in 2014. Following the trade slump of 2015 and 2016, goods trade again peaked in 2019 but
then fell to about US$17 trillion in 2020 as a consequence of the COVID-19 trade disruptions and economic
downturn. Trade in services steadily increased between 2005 and 2019 (from about US$2.5 trillion to close to
US$6 trillion). The COVID-19 pandemic had a particularly strong negative impact on trade in services, which
had proven more resilient during past crises periods. While goods trade bounced back strongly and surpassed
US$22 trillion in 2021, trade in services has been recovering at a slower pace and has not yet returned to pre-
crisis levels (Figure 1a). The decline in export growth rates for goods and services was rather similar for developed
and developing countries during the global financial crisis 2008/09 and the trade slump in 2015/16, however,
pronounced differences are observable for the COVID-19 pandemic. At the aggregate level, developing countries
experienced a less severe drop in goods exports growth, but their services sector experienced a much stronger
decline (Figure 1b).
During the last 15 years, the volume of international trade of goods has increased dramatically. Still,
trade volumes have declined during the economic crises of 2008, 2015 and more recently of 2020.
The growth in trade volumes (both imports and exports) has been generally stronger for developing
countries. Among major trading economies, China’s trade volumes have more than tripled during the
last 15 years. For the rest of the major economies, trade volumes have increased at a much slower
pace.
Figure 2
Volumes of international trade in goods
(a) (b)
300
Volume index (2005=100)
250
160
200
140
150
120
100
100
2005 2010 2015 2020 2005 2010 2015 2020
The volume of international trade in goods has increased dramatically in the last 15 years (Figure 2a). Developing
countries as a group have almost doubled the volume of trade in goods since 2005. By contrast, the volumes
of trade of developed countries increased by about 50 per cent since 2005. While import volumes have been
growing relatively more than export volumes for developing countries, the opposite has happened for developed
countries. The relatively larger increase in the volumes of imports can be explained by the increase in consumer
demand in developing countries. Growth in trade volumes was negative during the financial crisis of 2009 and has
slowed down substantially in 2015. Growth in trade volumes also turned negative during 2020 as a consequence
of the COVID-19 pandemic. Trade volumes rebounded strongly in 2021, both for developing and developed
countries. Among major trading economies, the trade volumes of China have more than tripled during the last 15
years, with exports volumes increasing relatively more than imports volume. For the rest of the major economies,
trade volumes have increased at a much lower pace. Moreover, even during 2020, the growth of trade volumes
remained positive for China.
The value of trade in goods is more equally shared between developing and developed countries. By
contrast, more than two thirds of trade in services are associated with developed countries. BRICS
account for an important share of trade in both goods and services. Least Developed Countries
(LDCs) continue to account for a very small share in overall trade.
Figure 3
Values of trade in goods and services country groups
(a) (b)
15 4
US$ Trillion
US$ Trillion
10
2
5
The relative importance of developed countries as suppliers in international markets is declining. Still, they account
for over half of the value of trade in goods and more than two thirds of trade in services. In 2021, developed
countries’ exports of goods was around US$11 trillion (Figure 3a), while that of services added up to about US$4
trillion (Figure 3b). In 2021, developing countries’ exports summed to around US$10.5 trillion in regard to goods
and about US$1.5 trillion for services. The BRICS – Brazil, the Russian Federation, India, China, and South Africa
– accounted for one third of developing countries’ goods and services exports. LDCs’ contribution to world trade
remains small, although some increases in exports and imports of these countries have been recorded over the
past decade.
International trade in goods is largely concentrated in developed countries and the East Asian region.
Trade among other developing regions is much smaller, with some exceptions for trade in primary
products.
Table 1
Composition of trade flows in goods, by importing and exporting regions
Trade in 2021
Exporters
(billion US$)
Importers Developed East Asia South Asia Rest of Asia Africa Latin America
7 525 754 2 832 100 245 18 476 20 245 37 755 153
Developed
793 5 708 64 2 626 11 212 213 235 79 127 82 503
1 930 181 3 261 130 100 14 374 3 140 10 291 91
East Asia
360 1 381 272 2 836 17 69 288 82 79 51 138 62
213 16 289 21 43 11 172 5 51 4 33 11
South Asia
39 153 24 244 6 25 111 56 26 21 10 11
483 58 275 10 64 11 189 26 65 8 34 14
Rest of Asia
30 375 3 259 7 46 33 127 5 52 6 13
233 40 158 13 36 8 73 6 71 16 20 13
Africa
22 150 7 132 4 23 28 35 17 38 1 4
613 54 383 5 25 1 18 1 12 1 186 46
Latin America
106 409 5 357 2 20 4 12 4 7 26 103
Change 2020-2021
Exporters
(per cent)
Importers Developed East Asia South Asia Rest of Asia Africa Latin America
21 12 20 12 35 19 42 15 33 12 22 15
Developed
67 17 55 20 75 35 66 27 53 31 52 20
26 25 29 25 38 55 43 33 43 14 30 22
East Asia
52 21 53 28 32 36 48 26 41 56 44 14
55 18 46 57 48 45 59 17 61 14 50 46
South Asia
113 50 62 44 53 49 61 63 58 79 36 56
15 16 25 11 11 -16 25 5 24 8 19 8
Rest of Asia
42 13 57 25 1 21 53 24 68 24 96 5
14 8 16 8 27 34 38 19 18 23 20 12
Africa
5 8 52 14 43 21 39 28 26 12 25 19
32 20 39 17 46 7 77 13 66 15 36 25
Latin America
76 22 82 38 75 41 182 63 87 76 58 32
Trade in 2015
Exporters
(billion US$)
Importers Developed East Asia South Asia Rest of Asia Africa Latin America
5 758 573 2 039 81 167 14 355 14 194 31 619 118
Developed
577 4 442 61 1 870 13 139 175 161 84 76 87 397
1 377 112 2 137 85 75 6 245 1 93 6 149 50
East Asia
140 1 120 188 1 848 22 46 191 52 44 43 55 44
151 14 195 15 35 8 107 4 37 3 26 7
South Asia
10 124 17 160 8 20 65 38 21 13 14 5
469 49 211 8 61 12 124 22 33 8 23 11
Rest of Asia
24 378 1 201 5 39 21 81 2 23 3 9
234 34 135 10 29 5 53 3 69 12 19 12
Africa
25 168 6 113 6 18 25 24 22 34 1 5
533 44 268 4 17 0 10 0 13 0 161 31
Latin America
64 404 2 256 2 13 3 7 10 2 29 96
The number given in the top left of each cell shows the value of bilateral trade in billion US$, the upper right
figure in each cell depicts the traded value in agriculture, the bottom left is natural resources and bottom right,
manufactures.
International trade in goods is increasingly linked to imports and exports of developing countries.
Even throughout economic crises periods, the share of South-South trade steadily increased from
around 17 per cent in 2005 to 28 per cent in 2021. The relative significance of intraregional and other
South-South (interregional) trade flows increased in 2021 compared to 2020 for all developing country
regions except Africa. A large and growing part of trade among developing countries takes place with
China.
Figure 4
Trade in goods between/within developed and developing countries
(a) (b)
2005
2015
South Asia 2020
2021
10
2005
2015
Rest of Asia 2020
2021
5 2005
2015
Africa 2020
2021
2005
2015
0 Latin America 2020
2005 2010 2015 2020 2021
The increase in world trade during the last decade was largely driven by the rise of trade between developing
countries (South–South) (Figure 4a). By 2014, the value of South–South trade had reached almost US$ 5 trillion,
corresponding to roughly 75 per cent of trade between developed countries (North–North). Despite the trade
slumps in 2009, 2015 and during the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020, the share of South-South trade in global
trade continuously increased from around 17 per cent in 2005 to 28 per cent in 2021. Figure 4b highlights the
contribution of South–South trade to total trade of developing regions. South–South trade flows represented
more than half of the trade of developing country regions (imports and exports), ranging from about 45 per cent
in Latin America to over 65 per cent in South Asia and East Asia. A significant proportion thereof represents trade
relations with China, amounting to at least a fifth of all South-South trade flows across all developing country
regions. Compared to the year 2020, the share of South-South trade has increased for all regions, except
Africa. While the share of interregional trade has increased across all developing country regions, the share of
intraregional trade has been decreasing for Africa and the Rest of Asia.
The trade rebound of 2021 resulted in large rises in the value of trade for almost all the largest bilateral
trade flows. One notable exception is the decline in agricultural exports from the European Union
to the United Kingdom, a consequence of the Brexit transition period. By contrast, the strongest
increases were recorded for imports of natural resources by the European Union, China and the
United States.
Table 2
Changes in the value of the largest bilateral trade flows between 2020 and 2021, by product group
Agriculture
Exporter Importer Change 2021 vs 2020 (%) Value in 2021 (US$ Billion)
European Union European Union 14 410
European Union United Kingdom -5 45
Brazil China 29 44
Mexico United States of America 15 40
United States of America China 71 37
Canada United States of America 27 36
European Union United States of America 19 31
United States of America Canada 15 25
European Union China 9 23
United States of America Mexico 21 19
Natural Resources
Exporter Importer Change 2021 vs 2020 (%) Value in 2021 (US$ Billion)
European Union European Union 76 203
Australia China 37 136
Russian Federation European Union 82 122
Canada United States of America 71 111
Russian Federation China 53 58
Brazil China 33 56
Saudi Arabia China 56 46
Australia Japan 51 45
United States of America European Union 69 41
United States of America Mexico 67 40
Manufacturing
Exporter Importer Change 2021 vs 2020 (%) Value in 2021 (US$ Billion)
European Union European Union 22 2 802
China European Union 23 545
China United States of America 19 525
European Union United States of America 16 418
Mexico United States of America 17 322
China Hong Kong SAR 26 301
European Union China 21 283
Taiwan, Province of China China 25 248
European Union United Kingdom 2 246
United States of America European Union 6 220
Source: UNCTAD secretariat calculations based on COMTRADE data.
The table reports the percentage changes between 2020 and 2021, and the value in 2021, of the 10 largest
bilateral flows in each of the three product groupings.
Intermediate products represent more than 40 per cent of world trade in goods (exceeding US$ 9 trillion
in 2021). While the amount of trade in each category has grown substantially since 2005, the relative
importance of goods at different stages of processing remained relatively stable. In 2021, trade
in all categories increased, with the strongest growth observed for primary products, followed by
intermediate products. Differentiated by broad category, three quarters of world trade in goods is
comprised of manufacturing products (about US$ 16.5 trillion in 2021). Trade in natural resources saw
a particularly strong increased by more than 50 per cent (to US$ 3 trillion in 2021).
Figure 5
Values of world trade in goods by stage of processing and broad category
(a) (b)
8
15
6
US$ Trillion
US$ Trillion
10
4
5
2
0 0
Primary Intermediate Consumer Capital Agriculture Natural resources Manufacturing
International trade in goods can be differentiated by stage of processing, depending on the intended use along
the production chain. Goods are therefore classified as primary, intermediate, consumer and capital goods
(the latter comprising machinery used for the production of other goods). Goods can also be differentiated by
broad category, including natural resources, agricultural products and manufactures. Regarding the stage of
processing, intermediate products made up the bulk of world trade in 2021 with a share above 40 per cent
(exceeding US$ 9 trillion), followed by consumer products amounting to 18 per cent (US$ 4 trillion) (Figure 5a). In
2021, the value of trade in all categories increased compared to the levels of 2020, with the composition across
categories remaining relatively unchanged. Trade in primary products was greatly negatively affected in 2020 but
saw an increase of more than 45 per cent in 2021. Similarly, trade in natural resources dropped markedly in 2020,
but recorded a strong increase of more than 25 per cent in 2021 (Figure 5b).
Trade of developed countries remains an important part of international trade, especially in relation to
imports of consumer and capital goods. Participation in international trade varies significantly among
developing regions. BRICS countries represent more than half of developing countries’ exports in
capital and consumer goods as well as imports of primary goods or natural resources.
Figure 6
Values of world trade in goods by region, stage of processing and broad category
(a) (b)
8
15
US$ Trillion
US$ Trillion
6
10
4
5
2
0 0
Exports Imports Exports Imports Exports Imports Exports Imports Exports Imports Exports Imports Exports Imports
Primary Intermediate Consumer Capital Agriculture Natural resources Manufacturing
Developed countries account for the bulk of world trade, both in terms of goods differentiated by stage of
processing (Figure 6a) and broad category (Figure 6b). They represent more than 50 per cent of exports and more
than 60 per cent of imports of capital and consumer goods. Among developing country regions, a significant
amount of trade is linked to BRICS, especially for trade of intermediates and manufacturing. BRICS also tend to
import few consumer goods (less than 10 per cent of the world total in 2021) while exporting a relatively large
share (about 25 per cent). The opposite is true for primary products, in particular natural resources, where their
import share of 31 per cent is about twice as large as their respective share in exports. LDCs only represent a
small share in all types of goods, with a larger share in the exports of natural resources (about 2 per cent in 2021)
and the imports of agricultural goods (above 3 per cent).
With trade flows of more than US$2 trillion each, chemicals and communication equipment represent
a substantial share of world trade in goods. Other significant sectors include machinery, metals
and fuel commodities. In 2021, the value of international trade bounced back in all sectors. Trade
values grew the most in the sector comprising energy products (oil, coal, natural gas and petroleum
products) as well as mining and metal ores. Compared to 2015, export market shares have moved
to the advantage of developing countries in almost all sectors and more so for transport equipment.
However, for some sectors, such as oil, gas, coal and tanning, export market shares have shifted
towards developed countries.
Figure 7
Values of world trade in goods by sectors
(a) (b)
Figure 7a displays the value of world trade in 25 categories of goods. In terms of value, a large amount of world
trade relates to chemicals, communications equipment, machinery, motor vehicles, metals and energy products
(oil, gas, coal and petroleum products). In contrast, light manufacturing sectors, including textiles, apparel and
tanning, comprise a much smaller share of world trade. Agricultural sectors – which include food, vegetable
and animal products, as well as oils and fats, and tobacco and beverages – accounted for a total of about
US$2 trillion of trade flows in 2021, or less than 10 per cent of international trade. The value of trade increased
at double-digit growth rates for almost all sectors. During the last decade, developing countries’ presence in
international markets has increased substantially compared to developed countries. Since 2015, export market
shares have moved to the advantage of developing countries in almost all sectors. However, for some sectors,
export market shares have shifted back towards developed countries, notably for the energy sector with the
emergence of shale oil production in North America since the mid-2000s (Figure 7b).
World trade in services is largely driven by travel and transport services. However, the importance of
these sectors has declined during the COVID-19 pandemic. While the transport sector recovered in
2021, travel services were well below their pre-crisis level. Since 2015, trade continued to increase
in most of the other sectors, especially in telecommunication and IT services and in R&D and
professional consulting. Developed countries remain the main exporters in all sectors. However,
developing countries are increasingly becoming important suppliers of services in the construction
and insurance sectors.
Figure 8
Market shares of trade in services of developing and developed countries by sector
(a) (b)
Construction Transport
Government Construction
With trade flows of almost US$ 1.5 trillion, the travel sector was by far the largest services sector prior to the
COVID-19 pandemic, followed by the transport sector with more than US$ 1 trillion. In 2020, these sectors were
hardest hit; in particular, the travel sector did shrink to almost a third of its 2019 value. While the transport sector
experienced strong growth in 2021, the travel sector has been lagging behind. Since 2015, trade continued to
increase in most of the other sectors, especially in telecommunication and IT services and in R&D and professional
consulting. Compared to 2015, the value of trade has increased in all sectors, except for the travel sector (Figure
8a). Figure 8b depicts the share of global exports of different service categories pertaining to developed and
developing countries, and their change between 2015 and 2021. Although developed countries still account
for the largest part of the exports of services, the export market share has been increasing to the advantage of
developing countries in almost all sectors (Figure 8b). Notable exceptions are travel and government services, for
which market shares have shifted towards developed countries.
For a substantial number of developing countries, gross domestic product (GDP) is closely related
to the exports of goods and services to foreign markets. This is particularly true for many Southeast
Asian economies, Eastern European countries and a number of African countries.
Index 1
Import and export propensity
Import and export propensity are computed as the value of imports or exports divided by the current GDP.
The import propensity expresses the total income spent on imports. The export propensity shows the overall
degree of reliance of domestic producers on foreign markets. Higher values imply greater dependence on foreign
markets.
World trade is largely unbalanced. China maintained the largest surplus position in 2021, followed with
a significant distance by Germany, Ireland, and the Russian Federation. Switzerland and United Arab
Emirates also showed considerable surplus. By contrast, the United States maintained the largest
deficit position, followed by India. Even though these imbalances are sometimes large in level, they
often tend to be low relative to the country’s GDP. However, the trade imbalances of many countries
in Africa tend to be large relative to their GDP while being small for the world as a whole.
Index 2
Trade balances
a) Trade balances of goods and services as a percentage of overall world imbalances, 2021
b) Trade balances of goods and services as a percentage of gross domestic product, 2021
Foreign trade balances (exports minus imports of goods and services) as a percentage of total world imbalances
are computed as each country’s share of total imbalances in the world. Negative values denote countries in
deficit, while positive values denote countries with a surplus. The foreign trade balance-to-GDP ratio is the ratio of
the foreign trade balance to GDP. It indicates how large trade imbalances are relative to the size of the economy.
Although many countries are striving to diversify their exports, agriculture and natural resources still
represent a large share of export baskets for many developing countries. Commodity dependence
is more evident for energy-exporting countries in the Middle East, raw material suppliers in Africa
as well as for Latin American countries, where agriculture represents a large share in total exports.
Dependence indices have declined over the past years for many countries in Africa and Asia, but
intensified for many countries in Latin America.
Index 3
Commodity export dependence
The commodity dependence index is computed as the share of the value of exports in primary products (i.e.
agricultural goods and natural resources) over the total value of exports. It varies from 0 to 100. High dependence
implies more exposure to shocks in the prices of natural resources and agricultural commodities.
Food and energy trade positions are very diverse across regions. In general, countries in Latin America,
East Africa and South Asia are net food exporters, while most of the rest of Asia and Africa remain net
food importers. With regards to energy, Europe and many of the countries in East and South Asia are
dependent on imports. In contrast, West and Central Asia, as well as most of the countries in Africa
and South America, are net energy exporters.
Index 4
Food and energy net position
Food net position is computed as a country’s exports minus its imports of agricultural products. It is then
normalized by dividing it by agricultural trade (imports plus exports). The index varies between -1 and 1, with
positive values meaning that the country exports more agricultural products than it imports. The energy net
position is computed in the same manner.
Although many developing countries seek to diversify their exports, many do not succeed. Among
developing countries, only a few emerging economies have reached levels of diversification similar
to those of developed countries. African countries remain poorly diversified, as their exports are
concentrated in a few products exported to a few destinations.
Index 5
Export diversification
Diversification of exports is measured by the Hirschmann–Herfindahl index where lower values reflect higher
diversification. It indicates the degree to which a country’s exports are dispersed across different destinations
or different goods (at the HS 6-digit level). Low diversification is interpreted as an indication of vulnerability since
an exporter being limited to a small number of export markets or goods is more exposed to economic shocks.
Although some have not yet achieved diversification of their export baskets, there is a tendency in
many countries to diversify into new products and destinations. At the same time, some developed
and developing countries have seen a decline in terms of product and destination diversification
since 2015.
Index 6
Changes in export diversification
The export diversification change reflects whether countries are becoming more or less diversified. Many African
countries became more diversified between 2021 and 2015, whether in terms of products or both products and
destinations. However, for some countries in Africa, as well as in Latin America and Europe the trend went in the
opposite direction.
Since 2015, the export growth for goods and services slowed down. However, there are a few
developing countries that experienced a decrease in exports between 2015 and 2021. During the
same period, a number of countries, mainly in Western and Central Africa and Central Asia have
increased their competitiveness in their main export markets.
Index 7
Export performance and export competitiveness
The growth rate of exports is calculated as the percentage change of the value of exports between two periods.
Negative values indicate a contraction in the value of exports, while positive values indicate an increase in export
earnings. Export competitiveness reflects the development of a country’s exports relative to its top 20 trading
partners in 2021 and is measured as the ratio of a country’s market share in the reference group in 2021 over
that in 2015. Positive values indicate that the country is becoming more competitive with respect to its peers.
In comparison to countries with similar levels of GDP per capita, Australia, Canada and South American
countries tend to export relatively less sophisticated goods . East Europe and most of South and East
Asia tend to export more sophisticated products. The situation is more heterogeneous across Africa.
Most of Asian countries’ exports have become more sophisticated since 2015.
Index 8
Export sophistication and the export sophistication gap
Export sophistication is measured by the EXPY index. Countries with a higher EXPY are those that export goods
that are more sophisticated (as measured by the PRODY index). The export sophistication gap measures the
gap between the EXPY and GDP per capita of a country. A positive gap implies an export structure that is more
sophisticated than the country’s GDP per capita would predict. Conversely, a negative gap implies an export
structure that is more typical of countries at a lower level of development.
ISBN 978-92-1-113090-4