022 Article A016 en
022 Article A016 en
022 Article A016 en
notices
Ian M. D. Little
to agriculture and less to industry." "Mis- countries. The author goes on to dismiss the
Economic Development: Theory, guided" industrialization is a recurrent view that a linkage exists between capitalism
Policy, and International theme in Little's analysis. and dependence. Quite appropriately, he
Relations The planning emphasis of the 1950s is, notes that "the hallowed capitalist-socialist
Basic Books, Inc., New York, 1982, xi + 452 pp.,
with considerable justification, termed dichotomy is a bad guide as to where
$22.95.
"topsy-turvy." The focus had been on com- fundamental changes in the socioeconomic
Covering a span of nearly four decades, prehensive planning, when project level order are required."
Little has produced a masterly overview of planning was crucial and largely neglected. In a brief treatment of the structure of de-
the recent history of development eco- Little examines some of the important theo- veloping countries and structural change,
nomics—both theory and practice—and retical contributions to the development of Little focuses on a few features that he had
international economic relations. He has, in project-level planning techniques and in- found "underemphasized or even misrep-
addition, proposed a number of reforms of vestment analysis in the context of the grow- resented." This chapter is, on the whole,
international economic arrangements. ing recognition of some of the undesirable rather disappointing precisely because of its
Somewhat simplified, his main theses are consequences of the import substitution pol- brevity. Perhaps the most interesting feature
that: (1) there has been a failure of the de- icies that most developing countries followed is a set of calculations that show that be-
tailed and ambitious planning efforts in de- in the 1950s. He marshalls impressive docu- tween 1960 and 1978, relative agricultural
veloping countries, which have generally mentation of the literature on trade regimes productivity, already low, declined for the
been associated with large investments in and of studies casting doubt on the so-called low-income developing countries, increased
industry under heavy protection; (2) devel- "export pessimism," and emphasizes the by somewhat for the middle-income developing
oping countries that have relied more on now familiar argument of the crucial role of countries, and more than doubled for the
market forces and export-oriented strategies export incentives. The structuralist precon- developed countries.
have fared far better; and (3) the preoccu- ceptions of the 1950s were, Little concludes, Little grapples in greater detail with both
pation with the "New International Economic considerably weakened in the ensuing the old order and the "New International
Order" by developing countries is mis- decade, and among the book's many witty Economic Order" (NIEO). The author's two
guided; they should instead work for a more observations are broadsides at the "two- chapters on the old order—the trade regime
liberal international trade environment, in gap" and "surplus labor" notions. (1945-73) and the monetary system
which they would participate actively and After a brief consideration of the "new top- (1944-73)—are the most succinct analyses
forgo special privileges. These views will ics" of the 1960s—agriculture, technology of the issues I have seen. Little holds strong
not come as a surprise to those who have and capital-labor substitutability, the trans- views on the trade regime—lamenting the
followed Little's previous writings. national corporations, human resource de- failure of the Havana Conference to reach
The author begins with a useful dis- velopment, population, and capital mar- agreement on an International Trade Or-
cussion of "Basic Notions," including the kets—Little embarks on a more extensive ganization, based on free trade and a non-
meaning of development and such charac- discussion of the questions that engaged the preferential world system. He dismisses as
terizations as "neoclassical" and "struc- 1970s. inconsequential, in terms of economic bene-
turalist" visions of economics, noting that He challenges the "radical view" that es- fits, the Generalized System of Preferences,
many analyses and policy prescriptions con- sentially attacked growth where the poor and is sharply critical of the developing
tain elements of both. With his terms de- were excluded from its benefits. Little argues countries for remaining highly protectionist
fined, Little proceeds to an excellent dis- that "where growth has been rapid, the poor- and resisting reciprocity.
cussion of the theoretical developments and est have benefited" and t h a t " . . . one should With respect to the monetary system, the
debates, as well as practice in the field, worry about relative inequality only to the author notes that by 1963 many economists
during 1943-60. This includes a compact extent that it causes absolute poverty." His recognized that the basis of reserve creation
discussion of pre-World War II planning, its emphasis on absolute poverty is well placed, had to be changed, otherwise the system
evolution, and the extension of this concept but it is difficult to accept the implied cavalier was bound to fail. The subsequent creation
to developing countries in the 1950s. Con- attitude toward income distribution. of the SDR, however, came too late to have
siderable attention is given to India's efforts Little does not find much substance in the much impact. On the International Monetary
at planning, which is described as having emotion-laden debate over "dependency Fund as lender, Little shares the widely held
been "non-Western." Little views the devel- and underdevelopment." In trade, resource view that the institution was not intended to
oping countries' planning efforts quite nega- transfers, and technology, he maintains that resolve crises that stem from a long period
tively, emphasizing the bias that resulted dependence is not automatic, unless mo- of policy bias against exporting and of
from equating development with industri- nopoly or oligopoly exists—something not excessive borrowing to support import
alization and noting the consequent neglect generally the case. Sovereign governments substitution.
of agriculture and rural development (except can control their own fates; it is the "cor- The author exhibits little patience for NIEO
for land reform) in the 1950s. Reflecting the ruptibility of the host," the author suggests, and the events of 1973-80. He finds essen-
consensus of the 1970s, the author argues "that is the worm in the bud." This is, of tially no new content in the demands of de-
that "growth or equity, or both would have course, a simplistic view of the world and veloping countries: "Virtually everything had
been improved if the terms of trade for agri- Little, remarkably, avoids mention of any of been on the agenda since UNCTAD I, and
culture had been better... or if more public the well-known incidents of extra-economic most of it since the 1940s. All that was
expenditure and attention had been diverted activity by transnational corporations in host new was the increased stridency, together
trial innovation first published in 1974. The public sector enterprise in India that started
Christopher Freeman
first two parts—the rise of science-related producing machine tools in 1956 and suc-
The Economics of Industrial technology, and innovation and the theory of cessfully diversified into watches, tractors,
Innovation (Second Edition) the firm—have been updated with more re- lamps, and printing machines. He focuses
MIT Press Cambridge, MA. USA, 1982, viii < 250 pp cent statistical information and new exam- on the strategies and problems in acquiring,
$25
ples from more current research. The third absorbing, and adapting different types of
J Davidson Frame part—innovation and government—has technologies from countries and companies
International Business and been completely rewritten to reflect further that have different approaches to technology
Global Technology research by the author and others, and new transfer. He also covers the development of
Lexington Books, Lexington, MA, USA, 1982, policy developments in the United States indigenous substitutes for imported com-
xiv -t 206 pp., $24.95. and the United Kingdom. ponents and the local generation of some-
product technology. Finally, he examines
R C. Mascarenhas Frame's book is a general introduction to
how the enterprise's leaders responded to
Technology Transfer and the interdependence between technological
challenges, and how the organization of Hin-
Development: India's Hindustan advances and transnational commercial re-
dustan Machine Tools itself had to evolve
Machine Tools Company lations, written for both business students
with changing circumstances, including its
Westview Press, Boulder, CO, USA, 1982, xv i and scientists/engineers. It compares sci-
relationships with the government agencies
270 pp., $19.50. ence and technology activities and policies
to which it was accountable and whose sup-
in developed and developing countries. It
These three books on technology and tech- port it had to enlist. The book persuasively
emphasizes the transfer of technology, with
nical change focus on different aspects of makes the point that a successful transfer of
a special focus on multinational corpora-
the subject, ranging from a perceptive exam- technology "should lie within the overall
tions, but also includes chapters on Third
ination of the process of industrial innovation strategy of an enterprise and should include
World demands for developed country tech-
in developed countries to a study of the ac- the choice of technology to translate that
nology, and on military research and devel-
quisition and absorption of technology by a strategy and an organization with which to
opment and arms transfers.
firm in a developing country. implement it."
Freeman's book is a considerably revised Mascarenhas' book is an excellent case
and updated version of his classic on indus- study of Hindustan Machine Tools, a premier Carl Dahlman
Other books received Ralf Dahrendorf (editor) Jacques Bourrinet and Maurice Flory
A note to readers: I used to get Finance & Development but it stopped coming.
Why?
Your name was probably dropped from our list because you
Since many readers write to us regarding did not return the renewal poll card immediately. This poll card
their subscriptions, we would like to is sent to all readers every three years. It must be completed and
returned promptly to ensure continued receipt of the journal. If
answer the most frequent questions:
you write to us, we can reinstate you on our mailing list!
I wrote to you two months ago, where is my copy? Can I get more copies of the journal? Could you send me two
Since it is a quarterly normally sent by surface mail, Finance language editions?
& Development may reach you well after your request reaches Normally, we can only send one copy and only one language
us. If you have not received your copy, please be patient. If you edition to each reader. Libraries and institutions may request
need to write again, please state that you have written before extra copies. Please state why you need more copies or more
and, if possible, give the date of the earlier letter. This will help than one edition.
us trace your request.
Could you send me a back issue?
Can I get my copy by air mail? We have a limited number of back copies. We try to meet
// you need your copy in a hurry, please ask for air mail requests, but this will not be possible in all cases. Microfilm or
delivery. An inuoice will be sent to you, and your subscription photocopies of articles are available, however, on payment,
will start after receipt of your payment. Otherwise you will, of from University Microfilms, Inc., P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI
course, receive your copy via surface mail free of charge. 48106 USA.