Fine Surface Cracks in Casting
Fine Surface Cracks in Casting
Fine Surface Cracks in Casting
Presented to the 105th ISIJ Meeting, April 1983, S156, at The University of Tokyo in Tokyo. Extended version received April 1,
1983. QC 1984 ISIJ
K CONCAST Service Union AG , Todistrasse 7, CH-8027 Zurich, Switzerland.
In the present case study, cracking problems " multi stage mold " or
, briefly, " MS-mold "). As
became apparent only when a heavier section, i.e., shown in Fig. 2, these plates are cooled by spray
260 x 260 mm was introduced for the manufacture nozzles form behind; no direct cooling of the strand
of seamless tubes. Thus, an investigation was started with corner sprays is applied in case of 260 x 260 mm.
considering the factors of known influence as de- In order to check whether cracking might be related
scribed above. to eventual copper pick-up from the plates, several
casts were also made with direct spray cooling
II. Experimental Procedure instead.
The main caster data are listed in Table 1. For The tests comprised 21 heats. The tested para-
all quality steels like seamless tubes, the submerged meters and their range are listed in Table 3. All
pouring technique is applied. Deviating from the the tests were carried out by casting 260 x 260 mm
smaller sections with chamfered corner geometry, the on one strand only, with smaller sections simul-
mold for the large size of 260 x 260 mm has a corner taneously cast on the other three strands.
radius of 20 mm. Steel superheat in the tundish was maintained
The range of casting speed for each size is given mostly between 25 °C and 40 °C. Regarding steel
in Table 2, together with the spray cooling intensity analysis, Fig. 3 shows that C-content ranged from
in Zone I which is assumed to be most decisive for 0.09 to 0.42 %, and Al-content was between 0.003 %
cracking. This figure does not include the cooling and 0.016 %. The Cu-content went from 0.08 up
in the top zone (Zone IA) which is indirect only, by to 0.48 %, with the corresponding levels of Sn and
means of 300 mm long cooling plates of Cu (i.e., Ni as illustrated in Fig. 4 (the Sb-analysis was not
available). Since intergranular cracking can be
Table 1. Main caster data.
enhanced also by the precipitation of (Fe, Mn)-
oxysulfides,l4~ the Mn/S-ratio is evaluated in both
figures, too : they range from 17 to 116, with higher
Fig, 2. Sketch of mold and top zone coolin g plates (" MS-
mold ").
Research Article
Transactions ISIJ, Vol. 24, 1984 (353)
values for the medium carbon steels around 0.2 % C was performed for all four faces of every slice inde-
(Fig. 3). There is also a tendency to lower values pendently. Furthermore, also the defect location,
with increasing Cu-content (Fig. 4) but the scatter i.e., corner, off-corner and mid-face was monitored.
too wide for a meaningful correlation. Despite the substantial amount of defect readings
For the evaluation of crack severity, a sample (JV.-400) a proper multiple regression analysis could
slice was cut from each bloom (bloom length about not be performed in view of the many variables in-
5 m) and etched in 20 % hydrochloric acid in order volved. Thus, the evaluation had to be based rather
to remove scale and reveal eventual intergranular on mean value comparison which yields not more
cracking. The severity was rated based on standard than a " trend analysis " and semi-quantitative cor-
samples with the grades from 0 to 4 (O=no cracks, relations at the most.
4=strong network of cracks up to 2 mm deep). This
III. Test Results
In the first test casts, efforts concentrated on the
optimization of secondary cooling. Then, further
attention was focused on the mold area. In both
respects, alloy effects were given due consideration.
1. Effects of SecondaryCooling
In the first tests, direct spray cooling was applied
in Zone IA instead of the cooling plates in order to
check whether copper pick-up from this support
system would be a factor. Thus, only 0.1 l/kg was
applied in the top zone to match the soft intensity of
the indirect plate cooling, and 0.3 I/kg for the total
secondary cooling. As indicated by the results in
Fig. 5, the average crack indices of 1.30 and 1.33 for
plates and sprays respectively are virtually identical.
During these tests, differences in the preferred
defect position could be observed. Table 4 shows
the relative frequency of defect location, i.e., how
frequently defects were observed at corner, off corner
and mid-face location for the slices checked. As
can be seen, the mid-face location is distinctly less
plagued by defects in case of the cooling plates, thus,
copper pick-up might be ruled out. Rather the
corner and off-corner regions are the preferred crack
Fig. 3. Range of C- and total Al-contents as well as Mn/S locations for both cases, in case of direct cooling
ratio for the test heats.
Research Article
( 354 ) Transactions ISIJ, Vol. 24, 1984
equally the mid-face position. The reasons are not ening, although the effect does not appear to be very
immediately evident but the coincidence of cracking significant.
with surface depressions was clear in many instances. From these comparative trials, the beneficial effects
In further tests with direct cooling by spray nozzles, of cooling plates on strand containment became
total spray cooling intensity was varied within a clearly apparent (Table 6). Allowing up to 5 mm
relative wide range (Fig. 6) . Nevertheless, the defect side bulging-which is at least permissible for lower
index does not indicate any clear trend under the carbon steels to prevent interdendritic cracks-, the
test conditions applied : while the curve for powder critical casting speed is nearly 1.3 mlmin for the
C reflects the expected trend, the one for powder plates whereas for sprays the limit is 1.0 rn/min for
B would just give the inverse dependence. Thus, lower and 1.1 m/ min for higher cooling intensity.
other factors must be more important to defect forma- Of course, the best strand support is provided by a
tion. Nevertheless, spray cooling intensity in Zone rigid roller apron but, necessarily, also more expensive.
IB and II was maintained at a low level down to Consequently, the cooling plates have been main-
0.21/kg in total, as to realize a high strand surface tained on all further test conditions.
temperature up to 1 030 °C at straightening. This
also provided adequate safety against transverse 2. Mold Effects
crack formation. In this context, the crack index In earlier tests, deep oscillation marks have led
was evaluated independently for each face in order to a preferentially transverse course of cracking
to find out whether the straightening action would which was aggravated particularly in case of low
enhance the cracking incidence. As can be seen carbon contents, i.e., around 0.1 % C. Such cracking
from Table 5, the outer radial side (fixed side) shows largely disappeared when the oscillation frequency
the lowest average crack index which may be due was increased to the maximum of 120 cpm.
to the compressive surface stresses during straight- The main attention was devoted to the selection
of mold powders, and also to the uniformity in
(manual) distribution. Mold powder consumption
was monitored, too. Mold powder performance was
mainly judged by the appearance in general. In
this respect, powder A gave consistently the most
favorable results-at least up to a casting speed of
about 1.0 m/min which coincides with a minimum
permissible powder consumption in the order of
0.3 kg/m2 (Fig. 7). The data for powder A bring
about also quite a clear relationship between crack
index and Cu-content as shown in Fig. 8. Powder
A has a viscosity of 7.5 poise at 1 300 °C and the
Fig. 9. Crack index as function of Cu-content Fig. 11. Crack index for different
for oil lubrication and two different Fig . 10. Crack index as function of mold thicknesses of mold wall
wall thicknesses of the tubular mold. water velocity for two mold powders. Cr-plating.
Fig. 12. Crack index and rhombic Fig. 14. Crack index res. pouring tube
deformation. Fig. 13. Crack index as, mold taper. geometry.
(356) Transactions Is", Vol. 24, 1984
Research Article
Transactions ISIJ, Vol. 24, 1984 ( 357)
Fig. 17. Austenite grain size vs, primary dendrite spacing Fig. 18. Regions of high temperature embrittlement relat-
for 0.15 %C-steel.25> ed to structural effects, schematic and adapted
after. 14)
spray cooling intensity leading to high strand surface solidification structure and enhanced microsegregation
temperatures could be deleterious-as also shown by formed in depressed surface areas.
laboratory simulation.6> However, strong cooling
raises the thermal stress level and also may, at a given V. Conclusion
surface temperature, enhance total scaling by con- (1) The formation of fine intergranular surface
tinually removing newly formed scale. cracks in bloom casting is strongly affected by the
A further negative effect of strong secondary cool- residual content but, like in case of star cracks, not
ing, particularly observed in case of BOF-steels with a necessary precondition.
low residual content can be the additional embrittle- (2) Rather, the main precondition for crack
ment due to precipitation formed by microalloys formation appears to be a coarse microstructure lead-
(Al, Nb, V, B) in connection with reduced surface ing to critical concentrations of segregated solutes
temperature as well as strong thermal cycling. This and/or precipitates along austenite grain boundaries.
probably may lead to a combined effect of region II- (3) Consequently, in order to assure best surface
and III-embrittlement for network cracking-as illus- quality, the aim of a fine solidification structure is of
trated in Fig. 18, and with the following consequences highest priority, achievable by maximum uniformity
to the formation of surface cracks in general: in the initial shell growth and avoidance of depression
(1) Region I mostly concerns steels with strong formation. All other measures, in particular a soft
segregation tendency (high C-steels and fully aus- spray cooling intensity, are of secondary importance
tenitic stainless grades in the first place), and crack only.
formation of intergranular nature (rather than inter-
dendritic) since microsegregation being highest at Nomenclature
locations of mismatch in dendrite orientation, al- Ir: relative spray cooling intensity (10-3)
though this effect can be blurred by subsequent Is : specific spray water consumption (i/kg)
grain boundary migration away from its original L : length of spray cooling (m)
position during cooling.27,28) .P: width of spray cooling (m)
(2) Region II is either caused by Cu/Sn/Sb- Q: mold powder consumption (kg/m2)
enrichment or (Fe, Mn) S-0 precipitated along grain Ve: casting speed (m/ min)
boundaries whereby a critical minimum grain diame- VM: mold water velocity (m/s)
ter is required, usually resulting as a consequence of W: spray water flow rate (m3/min)
coarse primary structure.
Acknowledgements
(3) RegionIII results from precipitations of micro-
alloys (A1N, Nb(C, N), BN) enhanced by proeutec- The cooperation with the operating team at
toid ferrite formation where solubility of precipitates STEFANA/Ospitaletto Works, headed by its tech-
is distinctively lower in ferrite, and also by coarse nical director Mr. 0. Bonetti, as well as the support
austenite grain size. of the experimental work by the personnel of CON-
Consequently, longitudinal cracks may form either CAST ITALIANA/Milan are gratefully acknowl-
in region I or II, depending on steel type which edged.
deviates from the generally assumed preference for Particular thanks are due to Dr. H. G. Suzuki of
region I,12,29) Star and network cracks are pre- Nippon Steel Corporation/Oita Works for helpful
dominantly forming in region II, and transverse discussions on the mechanisms of surface cracking.
cracks in region III but mutual overlapping into
regions I I and III appears to be also possible. How- REFERENCES
ever, it is not excluded that the very initiation of 1) R. Rosegger: Radex Rdsch., (1964), No. 5, 277.
microcracks would coincide with region I for all 2) K. G. Speith and A. Bungeroth: Stahl u. Eisen, 84 (1964),
types of surface cracks--in connection with coarse 1297.
Research Article
( 358 ) Transactions ISIJ, Vol. 24, 1984
3) F. Schmid and 0. Gross: Steel International, (1967), No. 1, 16) A. Grill and J. K. Brimacombe : Ironntaking Steelmaking,
11. (1976), No. 2, 76.
4) D. A. Melford : JISI, 200 (1962), 290. 17) H. Fredriksson and M. Thegerstrom: Scand. J. Met., 8
5) A. D. Nicholson and J. D. Murray: JISI, 203 (1965), (1979), 232.
1007. 18) Y. Sugitani and M. Nakamura : Tetsu-to-Hagane, 65 (1979),
6) M. H. Burden, G. D. Funnell, A. G. Whitaker and J. M. 1702.
Young: Proc. Int'l Conf. Casting Solidif. Metals, The 19) M. Wolf and W. Kurz : Metall. Trans., 12B (1981), 85.
Metals Society, London, (1979), 279. 20) M. Matsumiya, T. Saeki, J. Tanaka and T. Ariyoshi :
7) Y. Iida and H. Ooi: SteelmakingProc. AIMS, 60 (1978), 60. Tetsu-to-Hagane, 68 (1982), 1782.
8) H. J. Chang, N. H. Lu and M. C. Tai: SEASI Quart., 21) M. Wolf: Trans. ISIJ, 20 (1980), 710.
(1983), No. 1, 18. 22) Y. Sugitani, M. Nakamura and T. Watanabe : Tetsu-to-
9) H. Yasunaka, T. Fujimoto, T. Mori, K. Narita, Y. Suzuki, Hagane, 67 (1981), 1508.
I. Wakasugi, Y. Katagiri and W. Takagi : Tetsu-to-Hagane, 23) M. Kinoshita, H. Kitaoka, T. Tomura, T. Emi, T. Koshi-
68 (1982), A165. kawa, K. Sorimachi and K. Kusano : Tetsu-to-Hagane, 68
10) H. Maeda, T. Sugawara, M. Noguchi, I. Kudo, Y. Tani- (1982), A153.
fuj i and T. Yatsuzuka : Tetsu-to-Hagane, 67 (1981), 5902. 24) M. Wolf and S. Kohl : Tetsu-to-Hagane, 66 (1980), 5756.
11) K. Yoshida, T. Nagahata, T. Tomono, K. Kimura and S. 25) Y. Nun, T. Ohashi, T. Hiromoto and 0. Kitamura :
Tsujita : Tetsu-to-Hagane, 67 (1981), 1317. Trans. ISIJ, 22 (1982), 399.
12) T. Kohno, T. Shima, T. Kuwabara, S. Mizoguchi, T. Ya- 26) G. Schonewolf, G. Blohm, H. J. Grubler and S. Richter:
mamoto, H. Misumi and A. Tsuneoka : Tetsu-to-Hagane, JVeueHi tte, 24 (1979), 462.
68 (1982), 1764. 27) F. Matsuda, H. Nakagawa, S. Ogata and S. Katayama:
13) P. Colombo, F. Cristi, B. Rossa and R. Viani: World Steel Trans. I WRI, 7 (1978), 59.
& Metalworking, 4 (1982), 146. 28) B. Rogberg : Comm. by SANDVIK STEEL, Sandviken,
14) H. G. Suzuki, S. Nishimura and S. Yamaguchi: Trans. (1982).
151J, 22 (1982), 48. 29) J. K. Brimacombe and K. Sorimachi : Metall. Trans., 8B
15) R. E. Aseev, V. N. Zhuchin and V. M. Kondrashin: Steel (1977), 489.
in the USSR, 2 (1972), 284.
Research Article