Methods of Construction Partition

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 20

METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION PARTITION IN

CONSTRUCTION SITE

STAFISCO LINK TECH


Federal Polytechnic Oko, Anmbra state
[email protected]

Abstract
The construction industry plays an important role in
shaping modern infrastructure, but it is also associated
with numerous challenges, including the need for
effective site management. One important aspect of
construction site management is the implementation of
partition systems, which are vital for ensuring safety,
organization, and efficiency on the site. This paper
provides an overview and assessment of various methods
employed in construction partition, offering insights into
their advantages, disadvantages, and implications. The
research examine into the significance of construction
partitions in safeguarding workers, controlling dust and
debris, and facilitating a streamlined workflow. It
highlights traditional methods such as wooden and
drywall partitions, examining their historical relevance
and performance in contemporary construction practices.
Furthermore, this study explores modern partition
solutions such as modular and temporary systems,
which have gained popularity due to their adaptability
and reusability. This study contributes to enhancing
construction site safety, efficiency, and sustainability,
promoting better practices within the construction
industry.
INTRODUCTION
Construction sites are dynamic environments where safety,
organization, and efficiency are of paramount importance. Among
the important elements that contribute to these objectives,
construction partition methods play a pivotal role. According to
Lam et al., (2013) partition walls are vertical dividers which are
used to separate building internal spaces into rooms and
circulation areas like corridors.
Construction project site layout involves the identification,
sizing, and placing of the temporary facilities (TFs) at the required
positions within the boundaries of the construction project site.
These temporary facilities may range from simple lay-down areas
to warehouses, fabrication shops, maintenance shops, batch
plant, and residence facilities. Required temporary facilities and
their areas depend on many factors including project type, scale,
design, location, and organization of construction work (Elbeltagi
and Hegazy, 2004)
Site management in general, involves many tasks such as
site investigation before construction process starts, material
delivery and procurement management, keeping better site
records, keeping good site communication and high level of
information flow, monitoring performance regularly, establishing
a well co-ordination system among different parts, and
performing a good site layout planning (Mawdesley, 2003) Most
construction sites that run into trouble do so for reasons related
to managerial factors rather than because of technical problems
(Elbeltagi et al., 2004)
The role of site managers is to control and maintain work
performance and then taking actions to rectify situations where
performance is unsatisfactory. Safety and accessibility should be
given more consideration in site planning and also the designing
of path for movement of transport rather than to limit the
consideration only to distance and cost (Andayesh and
Sadeghpour, 2013).
Among the important tasks of site management is the site
layout planning. A detailed planning of the site layout and
location of temporary facilities can enable management to make
considerable improvement by minimizing travel time, waiting
time, and increasing workers morale by showing better and safer
work environment (Mawdesley and Al-jibouri, 2003).
Construction site layout planning has been recognized as a
critical step in construction planning. The basic function of the
process is to find the most suitable arrangement for the
positioning of temporary facilities. Temporary facilities have to be
placed right from the beginning of project to completion (Saka,
2012).
This study aims to provide an in-depth overview and
assessment of the various methods employed in construction
partition on construction sites. By shedding light on their
advantages, disadvantages, and broader implications, this
research endeavors to enhance our understanding of these
methods and their significance in the construction industry.
Purpose of the Study
The primary purpose of this study is to comprehensively examine
and evaluate construction partition methods, recognizing their
diverse applications and impacts within construction site
management. Other objectives include:
1. To equip construction professionals, project managers, and
stakeholders with the knowledge necessary for informed
decision-making when choosing partition methods for their
specific projects.
2. To address the multifaceted nature of construction
partition, considering factors such as cost, environmental
impact, durability, and ease of installation.
3. To examine the effects of partition systems on project
timelines and overall site productivity, underlining the
important role they play in the success of construction
projects.
Significance of the Study
The significance of this study lies in its potential to bring about
substantial improvements in construction site management. With
the construction industry constantly evolving and facing
challenges related to safety, efficiency, and sustainability,
understanding the nuances of partition methods becomes
indispensable. This research provides valuable insights that can
guide stakeholders in selecting the most appropriate partitioning
solutions tailored to their project requirements. Furthermore, it
contributes to the promotion of best practices within the
construction industry, ultimately enhancing site safety,
efficiency, and sustainability.
OVERVIEW AND ASSESSMENT
Traditional methods such as wooden and drywall partitions,
with their historical significance, are analyzed in the context of
modern construction practices. Additionally, this research
explores the growing popularity of modern partition solutions,
including modular and temporary systems, highlighting their
adaptability and reusability in construction projects.
In the assessment phase, key factors influencing the
selection of partition methods are considered. These factors
encompass the economic aspects, such as cost-effectiveness and
return on investment, as well as environmental considerations,
addressing sustainability and resource utilization. The durability
and ease of installation of partition systems are also scrutinized,
as these factors directly impact their practicality on construction
sites.
Moreover, this study looks into the impact of partition
systems on project timelines and overall site productivity. By
examining their effects on workflow coordination, safety
measures, and resource allocation, the research emphasizes the
imperative need for informed decision-making in construction
site management. Ultimately, the insights gained from this study
are intended to guide construction professionals in making well-
informed choices that align with their project objectives and
contribute to the overall success of construction endeavors.
Various methods are employed in construction partition to
create defined spaces within a construction site, and each
method comes with its own set of advantages, disadvantages, and
implications.
OVERVIEW OF SOME COMMON CONSTRUCTION PARTITION
METHODS
1. Drywall Partitions
Drywall partition is the most speedy wall system and is
economical substitute for traditional walls which makes it
environment-friendly, performance-driven solution (Waly, 2003).
These can be used for Interior applications and finished in a wide
variety of choices to suit every requirement.

Components of Drywall Partitions:


1. Gypsum Board (Drywall): Gypsum board panels are the
primary material used in drywall partitions. These panels
consist of a core of gypsum plaster sandwiched between
layers of paper. They are available in various thicknesses
and sizes.
2. Studs: The framework of drywall partitions is typically
constructed using metal or wooden studs. These studs are
vertically placed at regular intervals and serve as the
support structure for the gypsum board panels.
3. Tracks: Horizontal metal tracks are used at the top and
bottom of the partition to support the studs and provide
stability.
4. Insulation (optional): In some cases, insulation material
may be installed within the partition cavity to improve
thermal and acoustic insulation properties.
Drywall Partitions
Advantages
 Versatile and widely used for interior partitioning.
 Offers good sound insulation and fire resistance.
 Provides a smooth and paintable surface for finishing.
Disadvantages
 Requires skilled labor for installation.
 May not be suitable for outdoor use.
 Vulnerable to moisture damage.
Implications
 Effective for creating permanent interior divisions but may
not be ideal for temporary needs or outdoor construction
sites.

2. Wooden Partitions
A wooden partition is a type of wall or screen made of wood to
divide a room or space into smaller sections. Wooden partitions
can be used for various purposes, such as creating privacy,
separating functional areas, or adding decorative elements to a
space.
Advantages
 Easily available and can be constructed on-site.
 Cost-effective.
 Provides a rustic appearance.
Disadvantages
 Limited sound insulation and fire resistance.
 Susceptible to moisture and rot.
 Not as durable as some other materials.
Implications
 Wooden partitions are commonly used in temporary settings
or where aesthetics are not a primary concern.

3. Modular Partitions
A modular partition, often referred to as a modular partition
wall or system, is a type of interior partitioning system used to
divide spaces within a building or workspace. Unlike traditional
construction methods, modular partitions are pre-fabricated,
which means they are manufactured off-site in standardized
sections or modules and then assembled on-site (Raymond et al.,
2010). These partitions are popular in commercial and office
settings due to their flexibility, ease of installation, and the ability
to adapt to changing needs.
Modular partitions are commonly used in offices, healthcare
facilities, educational institutions, retail spaces, and various
commercial settings where flexibility, speed of installation, and
adaptability to changing needs is essential. They provide an
efficient and versatile solution for creating functional,
aesthetically pleasing, and well-organized interior spaces.
Advantages
 Quick and easy to install.
 Highly adaptable and reusable.
 Can incorporate various materials like glass and steel.
Disadvantages
 Initial cost may be higher compared to traditional methods.
 Limited customization options.
 May require specialized connectors.
Implications
 Ideal for temporary or rapidly changing project needs where
flexibility and speed are essential.
4. Curtain Walls
Curtain walls can also be used as partitions within a
construction site to create designated spaces or enclosures.
These construction site curtain wall partitions share some
characteristics with traditional curtain walls but are adapted to
meet the temporary and functional needs of a construction
project.

Advantages
 Provides abundant natural light.
 Offers flexibility in design.
 Suitable for large openings and high-rise buildings.
Disadvantages
 Costly compared to other methods.
 May require more maintenance.
 Limited insulation and privacy.
Implications
 Commonly used in commercial and residential buildings,
especially where aesthetics and views are important.

5. Temporary Barriers
Temporary walls are an essential component in the construction
industry, providing flexibility and efficiency during building
projects. These versatile structures are designed to temporarily
divide or enclose areas within a construction site, offering
numerous benefits for contractors, workers, and project
managers alike. Temporary walls not only create separate work
zones but also help mitigate dust, noise, and other hazards
associated with construction activities.
Advantages
 Cost-effective for short-term use.
 Quick to install and remove.
 Suitable for outdoor construction sites.
Disadvantages
 May not provide insulation or adequate security.
 Limited durability.
 Aesthetically unappealing.
Implications
 Useful for creating temporary boundaries or controlling
access during construction but not for long-term projects.

6. Soundproof Partitions
Soundproof partitions, also known as acoustic partitions or
sound-insulating partitions, are specialized wall systems
designed to reduce or block the transmission of sound between
different spaces. These partitions are used in various settings
where noise control is critical, such as offices, conference rooms,
recording studios, theaters, hotels, residential buildings, and
industrial facilities. They are particularly valuable in
environments where privacy, concentration, or acoustic
separations are essential.
Advantages
 Effective in reducing noise pollution.
 Suitable for construction in noise-sensitive areas.
 Enhances worker comfort.
Disadvantages
 Higher cost compared to basic partitions.
 May require specialized materials.
 Installation may be more complex.
Implications
 Vital for projects in urban areas or near residential zones to
comply with noise regulations and maintain community
relations.
CONSTRUCTION SITE LAYOUT PLANNING WITH RESPECT TO
DECISION MAKING PERSPECTIVE

Construction site layout planning has been recognized as a


tedious step in construction planning faced by site engineers and
or planners; construction site layout planning is a decision-
making process, which involves the identification of problems
associated to construction site layout design. Planning a good
site layout is a decision making process which involves the
determination of the construction site layout planning objectives.
Which are usually multiple in nature, and the layout constraints
identification of the construction site layout facilities and the
available site space. At times the construction in an unequal area
which is very dynamic during the construction project
undertaking. The generation of the construction site layout
alternatives, which fulfils the objectives of site layout design and
constructions, and finally selecting and evaluating the best site
layout plan for implementation (Ning and Lam 2008).
After extensive literature reviews for previous construction
site layout planning research works and discussions with project
managers and site planners. Some construction site layout
planning problems are identified as follows: suppose the
requirements of the construction work were changed on the
process of construction project accordingly the construction site
layout should be altered. Problem of construction site layout
design should be regarded as dynamic problem, under this type
of situation. However most of the researchers that work toward
this area in which they concentrated on the static construction
site layout planning problems previous reviews of construction
site layout design research works showed that the site facilities
had been shaped as rectangular block, in which the temporary
facilities can be assigned to any location. Academically this is
called equal area construction site layout planning problem. The
approach here is very convenient and it does not consider
whether the location can occupy the assigned facilities in reality.
This assumption is far away from the real life situation in
construction site layout planning. moreover limited research
works had been carried out so as to get solution for an unequal-
area construction site layout planning problems although there is
a research gap in solving unequal area construction site layout
planning problem (Ning and Lam, 2008).

Key Factors Influencing the Choice of Partition Methods


The selection of partition methods in construction is a critical
decision influenced by several key factors:
1. Function and Purpose: The primary function and intended
use of the partitioned space play a vital role in choosing the
appropriate method. For example, soundproof partitions are
essential in recording studios, while temporary barriers may
suffice for construction site dust control.
2. Cost: Budget considerations are crucial. Different partition
methods come with varying costs, including materials,
labor, and maintenance. Balancing the desired features with
the available budget is essential.
3. Environmental Impact: Sustainable construction practices
are increasingly important. The choice of partition materials
and methods can impact the environmental footprint of a
project. Opting for eco-friendly materials or reusable
partition systems may align with sustainability goals.
4. Durability and Longevity: The expected lifespan of the
partition is a significant factor. Permanent structures may
require more robust and durable partition methods, while
temporary solutions can prioritize cost-effectiveness over
longevity.
5. Site Conditions: Site-specific factors such as location,
climate, and available space can influence partition choices.
For instance, partitions in humid environments may require
moisture-resistant materials.
6. Installation Speed: Project timelines and deadlines often
dictate the speed of partition installation. Some methods,
like modular partitions, are known for quick assembly,
making them suitable for fast-track projects.
7. Aesthetic Considerations: The visual appeal of partitions
may be crucial, especially in commercial or residential
settings. Materials, finishes, and design options must align
with the desired aesthetics.
8. Sound Insulation: In spaces where noise control is essential,
such as offices or healthcare facilities, the soundproofing
capabilities of partition methods become a significant factor.
9. Compliance and Regulations: Adherence to building codes,
safety standards, and regulatory requirements is
paramount. Partition methods must comply with these
standards to ensure the safety and legal compliance of the
project.
Impact of Partition Systems on Project Timelines and Site
Productivity
The choice of partition systems can have a substantial impact on
project timelines and overall site productivity. The key
considerations include:
1. Construction Delays: Inefficient or time-consuming
partition installation can lead to project delays, affecting
timelines and potentially incurring additional costs.
Modular partitions, known for quick installation, can help
mitigate this risk.
2. Workflow Efficiency: Well-planned partition systems can
optimize workflow by segregating work areas, enhancing
organization, and minimizing disruptions. Conversely,
poorly chosen partitions may hinder productivity by creating
bottlenecks or insufficient space.
3. Resource Allocation: Partition systems can affect the
allocation of resources such as labor and materials.
Informed decision-making in partition selection ensures
efficient resource utilization.
4. Safety: Safety is paramount on construction sites. Partition
systems should not compromise site safety. Properly
designed partitions contribute to a safer working
environment by controlling access and hazards.
5. Adaptability: Partition systems that can adapt to changing
project needs without causing significant disruptions can
enhance overall site productivity.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Conclusion
The choice of partition methods in construction is
influenced by function, cost, environmental considerations, and
various site-specific factors. In selecting the appropriate
construction partition method, it is important to consider project-
specific requirements, budget constraints, and the expected
duration of use. The choice of partition method should align with
the overall project goals, safety standards, and environmental
considerations, ensuring that it enhances site organization and
contributes positively to the construction process.
Additionally, partition systems have a significant impact on
project timelines and site productivity. Informed decision-making
in partition selection can prevent construction delays, optimize
workflow, and ensure efficient resource allocation.

Recommendation
Since partition systems have a significant impact on project
timelines and site productivity, it is recommended that
construction professionals and project managers carefully assess
these factors and consider the long-term implications of their
partition choices to achieve successful construction projects that
meet both functional and time-related objectives.
REFERENCES
Andayesh, M, and Sadeghpour, F. (2013).Dynamic site layout
planning through minimization of total potential energy.
Automation in Construction, 31, 92– 102.
Elbeltagi, E, and Hegazy, T. (2004).Dynamic Layout of
Construction Temporary Facilities Considering Safety.
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,130
(4),534–541.
Lam, K. C. and Ning, X. (2009). Conjoining MMAS to GA to Solve
Construction Site Layout Planning Problem. Journal of
Construction Engineering and Management-Asce, 135(10),
1049–1057.
Mawdesley, M. J, and Al-Jibouri, S.H. (2003). Proposed genetic
algorithms for construction site layout. Engineering
Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 16(5–6), 501–509.
Ning, S. and Lam, M. (2008). GIS-based dynamic construction
site material layout evaluation for building renovation
projects. Automation in Construction, 27, 40–49.
Raymond W. M Wong, and Dr. Christabel Ho.
(2010).Consideration between Site Layout Facilities,
Provision of Work Equipment and Construction Planning
for Extremely Large and Complicated Construction
Projects.
Saka, P. and Yahya, M. (2012). Construction site layout planning
using multi-objective artificial bee colony algorithm with
levy flights. Automation in construction
Waly, A. F. and Thabet, W.Y. (2003). A Virtual Construction
Environment for preconstruction planning. Automation in
Construction, 12(2), 139 154.

You might also like