Final Exam
Final Exam
Final Exam
• Duration: 30 minutes
• The University.
What is a city?
What is a city?
1. A large town
2. A place with a Cathedral
3. The aggregate of two or more towns, specialized
districts and connective transportation and open
space corridors (McLaghlin, 2000)
4. The opposite of rural
The Culture of Cities, LEWIS MUMFORD,
(1938/1995)
The city, as one finds it in history, is the point of maximum
concentration for the power and culture of a community.
Plan elements
• Land use
• Transportation
• Housing
• Community facilities
• Economic development
• Historic preservation
• Urban design
Typical data needs for plan preparation
1. Maps and images
• Base maps
• Aerial photographs
• GIS map layers
2. Natural environment
• Climate
• Topography
• Soils
• Vegetation
• Water features
• Habitat areas
• Natural hazards
Typical data needs for plan preparation
3. Existing land uses
• Residential
• Commercial
• Industrial
• Institutional
• Open‐space lands (agricultural?)
• Vacant urban lands
• Farmlands
4. Housing
• Inventory of housing
• Housing condition
• Vacancy rate
• Affordability
Typical data needs for plan preparation
5. Transportation
• Street network
• Street capacity
• Traffic flow volumes
• Parking supply and demand
• Transit facilities by mode
• Bicycle networks
• Pedestrian networks
Typical data needs for plan preparation
6. Public utilities
• Water supply
• Wastewater disposal
• Solid waste management
• Storm water management
• Telecommunication services
• Electric network
Typical data needs for plan preparation
7. Community services
• Administrative centres
• Education facilities
• Parks and recreation facilities
• Health services
• Public safety facilities
8. Population and employment
• Population size
• Population characteristics
• Vital statistics
• Labour force characteristics
Typical data needs for plan preparation
• 9. Local economy
• Employment
• Retail sales
• Cost of living
10. Special topics
• Historic sites and buildings
• Archaeological sites
• Urban design features
• Existing zoning
Management of
Historical Sites
What is Heritage?
A broad concept that encompasses our Natural,
Indigenous and Historic or Cultural inheritance.
(ICOMOS)
26
Why conservation?
Why conservation
Utility of building (s).
Work of art, creative
Rare, challenging, or unique
Associative
Exemplary and instructive
architectural examples
Knowledge source
Economic benefit
Environmentally friendly MLK home restoration
Diversity of the urban env.
Cultural identity
28
Relevant Preservation Ethics
• Integrity of Fabric
• Is a state in which the original historic building materials, location, feelings,
and systems remain intact.
• Any act that changes them, adds to them, or damages them is considered
damage to the integrity of the historic fabric.
• The original materials and systems of the building are important as historic
documents that should not be falsified
29
Relevant Preservation Ethics
Maintaining Historic Character
• Refers to all those visual aspects
and physical features that comprise
the appearance of every historic
building.
• Character-defining elements
include
• the overall shape of the building
• its materials,
• craftsmanship,
• decorative details,
• interior spaces and features,
• as well as the various aspects of its
site and environment.
30
Urban historic
character?
• Aleppo -1930
• New roads in
the French
colonial city at
northwest.
2. Qualities to be preserved include the historic character of the town or urban area and all those material and spiritual
elements that express this character, especially:
a) Urban patterns as defined by lots and streets;
b) Relationships between buildings and green and open spaces;
c) The formal appearance, interior and exterior, of buildings as defined by scale, size, style, construction, materials, color and
decoration;
d) The relationship between the town or urban area and its surrounding setting, both natural and man-made; and
e) The various functions that the town or urban area has acquired over time.
Any threat to these qualities would compromise the authenticity of the historic town or urban area.
3. The participation and the involvement of the residents are essential for the success of the conservation program and
should be encouraged. The conservation of historic towns and urban areas concerns their residents first of all.
4. Conservation in a historic town or urban area demands prudence, a systematic approach and discipline. Rigidity should
be avoided since individual cases may present specific problems.
METHODS AND INSTRUMENTS
5. Planning for the conservation of historic towns and urban areas should be preceded by multidisciplinary studies.
• Conservation plans must address all relevant factors including archaeology, history, architecture, techniques, sociology and economics.
• The principal objectives of the conservation plan should be clearly stated as should the legal, administrative and financial measures necessary
to attain them.
• The conservation plan should aim at ensuring a harmonious relationship between the historic urban areas and the town as a whole.
• The conservation plan should determine which buildings must be preserved, which should be preserved under certain circumstances and
which, under quite exceptional circumstances, might be expendable.
• Before any intervention, existing conditions in the area should be thoroughly documented.
• The conservation plan should be supported by the residents of the historic area.
6. Until a conservation plan has been adopted, any necessary conservation activity should be carried out in accordance with the
principles and the aims of this Charter and the Venice Charter.
7. Continuing maintenance is crucial to the effective conservation of a historic town or urban area.
8. New functions and activities should be compatible with the character of the historic town or urban area.
Adaptation of these areas to contemporary life requires the careful installation or improvement of public service facilities.
METHODS AND INSTRUMENTS
9. The improvement of housing should be one of the basic objectives of conservation.
10. When it is necessary to construct new buildings or adapt existing ones, the existing spatial layout should be
respected, especially in terms of scale and lot size.
• The introduction of contemporary elements in harmony with the surroundings should not be discouraged since such features can
contribute to the enrichment of an area.
11. Knowledge of the history of a historic town or urban area should be expanded through archaeological investigation
and appropriate preservation of archaeological findings.
12. Traffic inside a historic town or urban area must be controlled and parking areas must be planned so that they do
not damage the historic fabric or its environment.
13. When urban or regional planning provides for the construction of major motorways, they must not penetrate a
historic town or urban area, but they should improve access to them.
14. Historic towns should be protected against natural disasters and nuisances such as pollution and vibrations in order
to safeguard the heritage and for the security and well-being of the residents.
• Whatever the nature of a disaster affecting a historic town or urban area, preventative and repair measures must be adapted to
the specific character of the properties concerned.
15. In order to encourage their participation and involvement, a general information program should be set up for all
residents, beginning with children of school age.
16. Specialized training should be provided for all those professions concerned with conservation.
34
Heritage and Local Community
Development
35 13610/27/2014
Development
• Different measures:
• life expectancy, adult literacy, access to all three levels of education, as well as people’s average income.
• UN: All aspects of individuals’ well-being, from their health status to their economic status and
political freedom.
36
Sustainability
• Sustainability has many sides,
• on the social level; it calls for
• social equity, justice, and equilibrium in distribution of resources.
38
So called ”Public” space
Definition
Public space: Any Public realm: : the Public sphere: Neither
space where the public realm of the state or the private sphere of
have access as open the public authorities the individual, their
space, buildings and sphere, which family and their daily
virtual space.
encompasses the life, nor the realm of
government, state the state, the space in
institutions and which “private people
workers (Hoskyns, come together as a
2014). public” (Habermas,
1962).
.
“Access” to public space:
1. Physical access.
2. Social access.
4.access to information.
Move from the narrow
perception of “streets
THINK OF STREETS as conduits for cars”.
AS
PUBLIC SPACES To think of “streets as
places” to stay
Who is the City for?
Dubai Amman
Privately owned space
Mecca mall
Privately owned space
City mall
Privately owned space
Taj mall
Valet parking
Mapping Narratives
PSEUDO PUBLIC SPACE:
PUBLIC SPACE DOES NOT EXIST!!
Neo-liberalism: Social polarization
adriana cobocorey
Social inequalities?
Public participation?
Definitions
• inequality is surprisingly difficult to define. This is in part because it is
a multifaced concept: the spatial division of rich and poor areas
sometimes reinforces other types of division on the base of race,
culture, or ethnicity, with immigrants in particular often facing a
combination of social and spatial discrimination.
• Chris Hamnett (2003) defines inequality simply as the process that
makes the rich become richer and the poor become poorer, a
formulation which focuses largely on the economic.
Definitions
Spatial segregation: can be defined as the “residential separation of
groups within a broader population”.
Jan Gehl
Moral
assumptions:
Social mix is Important
Public participation
Definition
Public participation:
Refers to the process that directly engages the public in decision-
making and gives full consideration to public input in making that
decision.
Benefits
Local participation provides
Heritage Conservation
University of Petra
Faculty of architecture & design
Urban Sciences and Heritage Conservation
Dr.amro yaghi
Farah alzoubi
201720711
Heritage Conservation 2
Content
1 - cover page
2 - table of content
3 - abstract
4 - introduction
5 - The problem
6 - Purpose and Objectives of the Study
8 - Data collecting
11 - Degrees intervention in Heritage
15 - salt case study
23 – Conclusion
24 – References
Heritage Conservation 3
Abstract
Heritage is our past that been preserved for the present and it will be inherited
for the future generations. Heritage itself is conceptualized as the meanings
attached in the present to the past and is regarded as a knowledge defined within
social, political and cultural context.
places which bear the marks of our predecessors' efforts to sustain life and satisfy
their needs. That part of our surroundings that displays the interaction between
people and places through time is called the historic environment.
The historic environments are important to society as a whole or to a group
within it and merit some level of protection or consideration. These are called our
heritage assets. They are the elements of the historic environment that we value.
The generations that follow us are most likely to value them too, for the same or
similar reasons. so, we have a responsibility to look after them.
conservation seeks to maintain and give the value of buildings by keeping their
original built form and architectural elements, favoring their restoration over
replacement or demolition and, when restoration is not possible, respectfully
recreating scale, period and character.
Heritage Conservation 4
1. Introduction
Our heritage is all that has been passed to us by previous generations. It is all
around us. It is in the houses we live in, our places of work, the transport we use,
our places of worship, our parks and gardens, the places we go to for our sport
and social life, in the ground beneath our feet, in the shape of our landscape and
in the placing and arrangement of our fields, villages, towns and cities.
4. Economic Sustainability
Retain money within the community by creating more local employment and
requiring fewer imported materials. Various industries such as construction firms
and product manufacturers also benefit from heritage conservation.
Heritage Conservation 7
7. Limited memory
It is also important to note, that we as a society have a limited memory. We
cannot remember everything about our past.
I. Natural Heritage
II. Cultural Heritage (monuments, group of buildings, Sites)
III. Combination of natural and cultural heritage.
Heritage Conservation 9
Heritage Conservation 10
Heritage Conservation 11
Prevention of deterioration
- Protecting cultural property by controlling its environment agents of
damage.
Preservation
- keep cultural property in existing state. Repairs must be carried out when
necessary to prevent further decay.
Consolidation
- Physical addition or application to ensure continued durability or structural
integrity.
Restoration
- Restoration when the item has lost part of its significance or function
through past alteration or deterioration. They are based on respect for the
original material. Most often such actions modify the appearance of the
item. Examples of restoration are retouching a painting, reassembling a
broken sculpture.
Reuse
- (Rehabilitation) To keep it in use with a few changes. Adaptive re use from
house to museum and office.
Heritage Conservation 13
Reproduction
- Copying an artifact in order to replace some missing or decayed parts,
generally decorative to maintain aesthetic harmony.
Reconstruction
- Done for historic buildings that are damage by fire, earthquake or war.
Heritage Conservation 14
Heritage buildings basically represent the past history and culture of a nation.
They constitute together the architectural heritage of an area. Heritage buildings
possess historical values resulting from their beautiful architecture and their
correlation with important events that occurred in the heritage area such as
religious, social and political events. Heritage buildings are subjected to processes
of degradation with time, which leads to a situation in which they became not
able to fulfil the purpose for which they were built.
CASE STUDY
in this case study will discuss the results of the main projects carried out at Salt
Historic Cores and focuses on the executed urban heritage projects undertaken
mainly by the Ministry of Tourism and Antiquities (MoTA) of Jordan in the last two
decades.
In many cities of developing countries, like Jordan and almost everywhere, the
existence of an older city core represents a unique historic link with the past. as in
the case of the many cities in Jordan such as in Irbid, As-Salt, Madaba and Karak
can be considered one of the most important evidence of the past.
Life style
In the case of the urban historic Salt core, the traditional houses are the most
important evidence of the past lifestyle. In fact, they, as in many historic cores,
can be seen as "the physical manifestation of the social and cultural traditions
which have developed to give the modem city and society its meaning and
character"
Traditions
that have evolved by the collective memory and their related traditional forms
can and must be widely used and re-used in contemporary architectural and
urban design projects. So re-functioning or conversion of traditional buildings to
contemporary uses is a tool for carrying the traditional environments into the
future, both physically and socially.
Assets
(geographical center) where the majority of these significant heritage buildings
are still under the ownership of members of the local families and remains
untouched by the restoration efforts. In addition, the majority of the residents of
those old buildings have left and migrated to Amman, the Capital. Many of the
buildings stand vacant while the families and communities living in are often too
poor or ignorant to maintain the old stone houses.
Heritage Conservation 17
Salt is located 30 km to the west of the capital Amman, and it is the 4th largest
city in Jordan, with a population of around 140,000 inhabitants.
The old city lies on three hills (Jada, Qala’ and Salalem ) with the central city Plaza
at the meeting points of the valleys.
Most of the urban heritage residents and mansions date back to the period
between 1890 and end of the 1920’s. These were mainly built in soft yellow marl-
lime using local technologies and later introducing newly imported materials of
metal I-sections and red tiles for roofing.
Heritage Conservation 18
The main heritage buildings in Salt include the urban merchants, residents houses
at the turn of the twentieth century, commercial linear markets and religious
buildings.
More than 600 heritage houses such as Abu-Jaber mansion of 1890, turned into
Salt historic museum with a network of stairs that run all the way down from the
hills to overcome the rigid topography of the city.
The traditional small mosque of Al-Hammam Street was another project for
renewal, where an extension for a women prayer hall was added to the upper
floor and following to that a new façade was built in front of the original façade. It
is worth mentioning that the original facade still exists behind the later modern
addition.
The traditional small mosque of Al-Hammam Street was another project for
renewal, where an extension for a women prayer hall was added to the upper
floor and following to that a new façade was built in front of the original façade. It
is worth mentioning that the original facade still exists behind the later modern
addition.
Heritage Conservation 20
The entrance level was built 1900-1905 on top of road - level vaulted basements
that would have been used for storage. The upper floor was added a few years
later. Downstairs one can see cross - vaults and barrel - vaults supporting the
ceilings while upstairs there are iron girders, as used in the construction of the
Hijaz railway. The rooms upstairs are light, each with large windows originally
glazed with plate - glass imported from Germany and Britain. The upstairs area was
mainly used by the family, who lived in the house until the mid - 1950, when it was
converted for use as a school.
Heritage Conservation 21
Situated prominently on the main square (Sahet al Ain) , the Abu Jaber House
dwarfed all other buildings in town and remains one of the most significant
architectural icons in Jordan today . The house was built in 1887 and started
building the ground floor. The first floor was added in 1896. The second floor was
added in 1905.
The building is crowned by a complex pitched roof in imported red tiles. The house
boasted more windows than any other house in town, with colored glass and
wrought iron work set into finely carved stone lintels framed by columns, plaster
Heritage Conservation 22
moldings and painted ceilings. It was also one of the first houses in town with
internal plumbing. The Abu Jaber House was transformed into a museum in 2010.
The Historic Old Salt Museum recounts the history of the city in its Golden Age,
between the end of the 19th century and the 1930s .
1.4 Conclusion
We must have a sympathy and understanding for old buildings and recognize
that sensitive and appropriate treatments must be applied if their life and beauty
is to be preserved. Every old building has its own character and, by becoming fully
acquainted with it, I can recommend the most suitable course of action essential
to restore it fully to its original character and beauty.
Heritage Conservation 24
References
Fakhoury, L., (1987), Salt; A Study in Conservation, University of York, UK (unpublished Master
thesis)
Fakhoury, L. Haddad, N., (2014), Manual for the conservation of the Historic Centre of Salt, (in
Arabic), CultTech, Amman. https://issuu.com/asociacionrehabimed/docs/manual_as_salt
Steinberg, Florian, (1996), Conservation and Rehabilitation of Urban Heritage in Developing Countries,
Habitat International. Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 463-475.
https://universes.art/en/art-destinations/jordan#c41984
POLITICS & URBAN
PLANNING
Urban planning is a technical and political process concerned with the development and use of land
protection and use of the environment, public welfare, and the design of the urban environment, including air,
water, and the infrastructure passing into and out of urban areas such as transportation, communications and
distribution network.
Politics is the process of making decision by applying to all members of a group. Politics refers to achieving
and exercising position of governance in an organized control over human community, particularly a state.
Political system is a framework which defines acceptable political methods within a given society
WHY IS PLANNING POLITIC AL ?
• For several reasons, planning generally takes place in a highly politicized environment.
1. Planning often involves matters in which people have large emotional stakes—for
example, the character of a neighborhood or the quality of a school district. A
planning decision that you do not like may intrude itself into your life every day
because its fruits are located where you live or work. The often very emotional
suburban resistance to subsidized housing is largely a matter of residents’ fears about
the effect it will have on the local school system. The residents may be right or wrong,
but either way it is easy to understand why they become passionate about what they
think will affect the happiness and safety of their children. Vociferous citizens’
opposition was the major force that ended Urban Renewal (see Chapter 12). Few
actions of government can arouse more emotion than a program that might force the
citizen to give up an apartment or relocate his or her business to make way for what
one writer called “the federal bulldozer.”
• 2. Planning decisions are visible. They involve buildings, roads, parkland, properties—
entities which citizens see and know about. Planning mistakes, like architectural
mistakes, are hard to hide. 3. Like all functions of local government, the planning
process is close at hand. It is easier for the citizen to affect the actions of a town board
or a city council than the actions of a state legislature or of Congress. That feeling of
potential effectiveness encourages participation.
• 4. Citizens correctly assume that they know something about planning without having
studied it formally. Planning involves land use, traffic, the character of the community,
and other items with which they are familiar.Therefore, citizens tend not to defer to
planners.
• 5. Planning involves decisions with large financial consequences. Mr. X owns
100 acres of farmland on the urban fringe. Land values in the area are rising,
and it is clear that the land will soon pass from agricultural to a more
intensive use. If municipal sewer and water lines are extended along the road
fronting the property, the land will be suitable for garden apartment
development at 12 units per acre, making it worth, say, $100,000 per acre. On
the other hand, if the land is not served with utilities, development there will
be limited to single-family houses on one-acre lots, and land will be worth
$10,000 per acre. Mr. X now has a $9 million interest in whether the
municipal master plan shows sewer and water lines down a particular road.
Variations on this theme could easily be posed in terms of zoning, street
widening, community development, construction of public buildings, flood
control measures, and the like.
• 6. There can be a strong link between planning questions and property taxes.
The property tax is one of the financial mainstays of local government as well
as of public education. Planning decisions that affect what is built within a
community affect the community’s tax base. This affects the property taxes
that community residents must pay, and these taxes are hardly a trivial sum. In
2013 total property tax collections in the United States were approximately
$488 billion, or a little over $1,500 per capita. Concern over property tax
levels has been very great for many years. Witness Proposition 13 in California
and comparable property tax limits in a number of other states.
PLANNERS & POWER
• Planners are basically advisors. Alone, the planner does not have the power
to do many of the things that cause change within the community:
to commit public funds, to enact laws, to enter into contracts, or to exercise
the power of eminent domain.Where the planner does have some legal
powers, perhaps in connection with land-use controls, as discussed in
Chapter 9, they are powers granted by the legislative body and removable
by that same body. The planner’s influence on events, then, stems from the
capacity to articulate viewpoints and develop consensus and coalitions
among those who do wield significant power.
• A plan is a vision of the future. A planner moves events to the extent that he or she can
cause that vision to be shared. In the early years of planning—as noted in connection
with the Plan of Chicago—the view was that the plan came solely, or almost solely, from
the head of the planner. It was then his or her task to sell that vision to the public and to
the political establishment of the community. This is exactly what was done with great
success in the Chicago case by Burnham and his associates.
• Planners now view involvement with politics very differently than they did a few decades
ago. In the 1920s and 1930s, it was common to try to isolate the planning process from
politics—to keep planning “above” politics. A common political arrangement was to have
the planner report solely to a “nonpolitical” planning board. In time it was realized that
since the political sphere was where decisions were made, isolating the planner from
politics rendered him or her much less effective. Then, too, it came to be realized that
the term nonpolitical is misleading. If one appoints a group of prominent citizens as a lay
board, one has, in fact, made a political decision. A group of nonprominent citizens might
give the planners a very different set of instructions. No one is really nonpolitical, since
everyone has interests and values, and that is the substance of which politics is made.
FRAGMENTATION OF POWER
• 1. The planner as neutral public servant. In this role, planners take a politically neutral stance
and fall back on their professional expertise, which they will use to tell the community how best to
do what it wishes to do.They will not, in general, try to tell the community what it ought to do.The
advice and technical work they present to the community, subject to law and personal and
professional ethics, will largely be confined to “how to” and “what if” and not “should” or “should
not.”
• In both communism and socialism, the people own the factors of economic
production.The main difference is that under communism, most property and
economic resources are owned and controlled by the state (rather than individual
citizens); under socialism, all citizens share equally in economic resources as
allocated by a democratically-elected government.This difference and others are
outlined in the table below.
• It started after communist takeover in the early 1950s. Through implementing new
national urban policies, communist planners first introduced urban
planning by creating an urban system with Chinese characteristics, by applying
centralized economic planning and industrialization especially in heavy industry.
• In a socialist economy, the means of production and distribution are owned,
controlled and regulated by the public, either through the state or through
cooperatives.
• The basic motive is not to use the means of production for profit, but rather for the
interest of social welfare
SUMMARY
• Planning takes place in a highly political environment because planning often involves issues in which
citizens have a large emotional stake; the results of planning decisions are often highly
visible; planning questions are more accessible to citizens than those handled at the state or national
level; citizens feel they have insight into planning questions and are not overly deferential to planners’
expertise; planning decisions often have large financial effects on property owners; and planning
decisions may have significant effects on property tax rates. Planners exercise little or no power
directly but rather affect events to the extent that they affect the political processes of the
community. In the last several decades, the idea of planning as a nonpolitical process has given way to
a more realistic view of the planner as one of a number of participants in the political process.The
older view of the planner as presenting a finished plan to the community has now been supplanted by
the view that planning is a community process, one that the planner facilitates and supports with
technical expertise. Depending on the community and the personality and ideology of the planner(s),
a variety of planning styles can be identified: the planner as neutral public servant; the planner as
builder of community consensus; the planner as entrepreneur; the planner as advocate, and the
planner as agent of radical change
PHASE 2
• The design of cities has been the conscious task of many throughout history. However, only in the
1950s, with the advent of university degree programs, did the term urban designer and the profession
of urban design emerge with a distinct label. Cities develop over time because of the conscious and
unconscious acts of people. Urban designers assume that in spite of their vast scale and complexity,
cities can be designed and their growth shaped and directed.A major example of human ability to
shape the urban environment is the work of Baron Haussmann from 1855 to 1868 in Paris during the
time of Napoleon III. During this period, Haussmann was responsible for creating a new pattern of
boulevards that reshaped the character of Paris.The facades of buildings along the grand boulevards
were required to be uniform, giving a sense of rhythm and order to the streets. The grand tree-lined
boulevards he created became and remain some of the major public spaces of Paris.
Haussmann’s design a century later. A view down the Seine from Notre Dame cathedral
• He addressed the problem of the flow of traffic and the appropriate uses of land. He shaped the
skyline and the proportion of space by limits on height and rules governing the space between
buildings.The vistas shaped by the boulevards focused on major public buildings and on gardens, giving
new character to the nineteenth-century city.This plan for Paris, using grand boulevards as a major
orienting force, was copied throughout the world.
Napoléon III dismissed Berger as the Prefect of the Seine and sought a more effective manager. His minister of the
interior,Victor de Persigny, interviewed several candidates, and selected Georges-Eugène Haussmann, a native
of Alsace and Prefect of the Gironde (capital: Bordeaux), who impressed Persigny with his energy, audacity, and ability to
overcome or get around problems and obstacles. He became Prefect of the Seine on 22 June 1853, and on 29 June, the
Emperor showed him the map of Paris and instructed Haussmann to aérer, unifier, et embellir Paris: to give it air and open
space, to connect and unify the different parts of the city into one whole, and to make it more beautiful. [15]
Haussmann went to work immediately on the first phase of the renovation desired by Napoléon III: completing
the grande croisée de Paris, a great cross in the centre of Paris that would permit easier communication from east to
west along the rue de Rivoli and rue Saint-Antoine, and north-south communication along two new Boulevards,
Strasbourg and Sébastopol. The grand cross had been proposed by the Convention during the Revolution, and begun by
Napoléon I; Napoléon III was determined to complete it. Completion of the rue de Rivoli was given an even higher
priority, because the Emperor wanted it finished before the opening of the Paris Universal Exposition of 1855, only two
years away, and he wanted the project to include a new hotel, the Grand Hôtel du Louvre, the first large luxury hotel in
the city, to house the Imperial guests at the Exposition.[16]
Under the Emperor, Haussmann had greater power than any of his predecessors. In February 1851, the French Senate
had simplified the laws on expropriation, giving him the authority to expropriate all the land on either side of a new
street; and he did not have to report to the Parliament, only to the Emperor. The French parliament, controlled by
Napoléon III, provided fifty million francs, but this was not nearly enough. Napoléon III appealed to the Péreire brothers,
Émile and Isaac, two bankers who had created a new investment bank, Crédit Mobilier. The Péreire brothers organised a
new company which raised 24 million francs to finance the construction of the street, in exchange for the rights to
develop real estate along the route. This became a model for the building of all of Haussmann's future boulevards. [17]
To meet the deadline, three thousand workers laboured on the new boulevard twenty-four hours a day. The rue de
Rivoli was completed, and the new hotel opened in March 1855, in time to welcome guests to the Exposition. The
junction was made between the rue de Rivoli and rue Saint-Antoine; in the process, Haussmann restyled the Place du
Carrousel, opened up a new square, Place Saint-Germain l'Auxerrois facing the colonnade of the Louvre, and
reorganized the space between the Hôtel de Ville and the place du Châtelet.[18] Between the Hôtel and Ville and
the Bastille square, he widened the rue Saint-Antoine; he was careful to save the historic Hôtel de Sully and Hôtel de
Mayenne, but many other buildings, both medieval and modern, were knocked down to make room for the wider street,
and several ancient, dark and narrow streets, rue de l'Arche-Marion, rue du Chevalier-le-Guet and rue des Mauvaises-
Paroles, disappeared from the map.[19]
In 1855, work began on the north-south axis, beginning with Boulevard de Strasbourg and Boulevard Sébastopol, which
cut through the center of some of the most crowded neighborhoods in Paris, where the cholera epidemic had been the
worst, between the rue Saint-Martin and rue Saint-Denis. "It was the gutting of old Paris," Haussmann wrote with
satisfaction in his Memoires: of the neighborhood of riots, and of barricades, from one end to the other." [20] The
Boulevard Sébastopol ended at the new Place du Châtelet; a new bridge, the Pont-au-Change, was constructed across
the Seine, and crossed the island on a newly built street. On the left bank, the north-south axis was continued by the
Boulevard Saint-Michel, which was cut in a straight line from the Seine to the Observatory, and then, as the rue d'Enfer,
extended all the way to the route d'Orléans. The north-south axis was completed in 1859.
The two axes crossed at the Place du Châtelet, making it the center of Haussmann's Paris. Haussmann widened the
square, moved the Fontaine du Palmier, built by Napoléon I, to the center and built two new theaters, facing each other
across the square; the Cirque Impérial (now the Théâtre du Châtelet) and the Théâtre Lyrique (now Théâtre de la Ville).
https://study.com/academy/lesson/georges-eugene-haussmann-s-urban-
renewal-of-paris.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SlHlSCvh0JA
THANK YOU
Spatial Agency
• spatial agency has the potential to more fully engage with the
networks and structures that, due to the limited scope of the
‘profession’, others have claimed and have reduced the architect to a
technical facilitator “with decisions effectively made by others”
The motivations of spatial agency
• In the first essay, and begin with the common reasons for students
entering the architectural profession – ‘to make the world a better
place’
• This initial motivation can, over time, be replaced with “the more
simple, and more controllable, motivation of making beautiful stuff”
• beautiful thing will lead to a beautiful life”
• The primary motivations of spatial agency are described as:
Ecological, Ethical, Pedagogical, Political and Professional.
The critique of the
loss of “political”
motivation
• The trend for spatial agency over time shows how these practices are not new but
have not been taken into the mainstream of architectural practice.
• Spatial agency is not restricted to one country or region but is global.
• Spatial agency shows that it is a part of the wider architectural landscape.
• Profile of these wrong practices, which are accepted outside of architectural
circles judging by the examples presented.
Case Study
The Boulevard
Different Actors
ﻗﺻر اﻟﺣﻣراء
وﯾﻛﺎد ان ﯾﺷﻣل ذﻟك ﺣﺳن ﻓﺗﺣﻲ -ﺻﺎﺣب اطروﺣﺔ ﻋﻣﺎرةاﻟﻔﻘراء
ﺣﺳن ﻓﺗﺣﻲ ﯾﻛﺗب ﻋن ﻣﻌﺎﻧﺎﺗﮫ ﻣﻊ دواﺋر اﻟﺣﻛم وﻋﻘﻠﯾﺎت اﺻﺣﺎب اﻟﻘرار ﻓﻲ ﻣﺻر ﻓﻲ
اﻻرﺑﻌﯾﻧﯾﺎت ﻓﻲ ﻗﺑول اﻓﻛﺎره اﻟﺣﺎﻟﻣﺔ ﻟﺗﺟده ﻓﻲ اواﺧر ﺣﯾﺎﺗﮫ اﻟﻣﮭﻧﯾﮫ ﯾﺻﻣم ﻟﻛﺑﺎر اﻻﺛرﯾﺎء ﻓﻲ
دول اﻟﺧﻠﯾﺞ اﻟﻌرﺑﻲ ,ﺑﻣﺎ ﻻﯾﺗﯾﺢ ﻟﻧﺎ اﻟﻣﻘﺎم ﺗﺳﻣﯾﺗﮭم ﻣﻣن ﻟﮭم ﺣﺿور داﺋم ﻋﻠﻰ اﺑواب
اﻟﺳﻼطﯾن واﻟﻣﻠوك واﻻﻣراء وھذه اﻟﻌﻼﻗﮫ اﻣﺎ ھﻲ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﻧﻔﻌﯾﮫ ﻣﺻﻠﺣﯾﮫ ﻣﺎدﯾﮫ ﻣﺣﺿﮫ وان
ﺗﻌددت اﻻطروﺣﺎت اﻟﻔﻛرﯾﮫ وﺗدﺛرت ﺑﺎﻗﻧﻌﺔ اﻟﻔﻛر واﻟﺛﻘﺎﻓﮫ واﻟﺗراث وﻏﯾرھﺎ ﻣن ﻧﺑﯾل
اﻻﻓﻛﺎر واﻟﻘﯾم وﺗﺳﺎﻣﯾﮭﺎ
ﻗرﯾﺔ ﺣﺳن ﻓﺗﺣﻲ اﻟﺣﺎﻟﻣﺔ
وﻓﻲ ﻣﻘﺎﺑل ھذا اﻟﺳﻌﻲ «اﻻرﺗزاﻗﻲ» ﻣن ﻗﺑل اﻟﻣﻌﻣﺎر ﻛﺎﻧت ھﻧﺎك ﻧظرة ﺳﯾﺎﺳﯾﺔ ﻣن ﻗﺑل
اﻟﺣﺎﻛم ودواﺋر اﻟﻣﺷورة ﻓﻲ ﺑﻼطﮫ ﺑﻧﻔﻌﯾﺔ اﺳﺗﺧدام اﻟﻣﻌﻣﺎر ﻓﻲ ﺗوظﯾﻔﺔ ﻛوﺳﯾﻠﺔ ﺗﺧدم اھداﻓﺎ
ﺳﯾﺎﺳﯾﺔ وﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺳﺗوﯾﺎت ﻣﺗﻌددة
ﻓﮭﻧﺎك ﻣﺳﺗوى ﻓﻲ ﺗﻛرﯾس ھﯾﻣﻧﺔ اﻟدوﻟﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ اﻟﻔرد ﺑﺗﻘدﯾم ﻣﻔﮭوم ﻣﺑﺗدع ﻓﻲ اﻟﻌﻣﺎرة
اﻟﻣﺳﺟدﯾﺔ اﻟﺻﻧﻣﯾﺔ ،ﺳطوة اﻟﺣﺎﻛم و ھو ﻣﻔﮭوم ﻗدﯾم ﺗﺎرﯾﺧﯾﺎ ﻋﻛﺳﺗﮫ ﻣﻌﺎﺑد اﻟﻔراﻋﻧﺔ اﻟﺗﻲ
ﻛرﺳت «ﻋﻣدا» ﺳطوة رﺟﺎل اﻟدﯾن واﻟﻛﮭﻧﺔ اﻟذﯾن ﻛﺎﻧت ﻟﮭم ﺳطوة ﺳﯾﺎﺳﯾﺔ ﻛطﺑﻘﺔ ﻣﺳﯾطرة
وﺣﺎﻛﻣﺔ .ﻓﻛﺎن ﻣﻘﯾﺎس اﻻﻧﺳﺎن «اﻟﻣﺻﻐر» ﻓﻲ ھذه اﻟﻣﻌﺎﺑد «اﻟﺿﺧﻣﺔ» ﯾﻛﺎﻓﺊ اﻟواﺣد
ﻟﻠﻣﺎﺋﮫ وﯾزﯾد.
وھﻧﺎك ﻧوﻋﺎ اﺧر ﻣن اﻟﺗوظﯾف اﻟﺳﯾﺎﺳﻲ ﯾﻛﻣن ﻓﻲ اﻟﻘﻣﻊ اﻟﻔﻛر اﻟﻣﺿﺎد ﻟﻠدوﻟﺔ ﻣن ﺧﻼل
اﻟﻣﻌﻣﺎر ﺑﺷﻛل ﻣﺑﺎﺷر او ﻏﯾر ﻣﺑﺎﺷرواﻟﻘﻣﻊ اﻟﻣﺑﺎﺷر ﻋﻛﺳﺔ ﻧﺎﺑﻠﯾون
اﺛﻧﺎء اﻟﺛورة اﻟﻔرﻧﺳﯾﺔ ﺑﺗوظﯾف ﻟﻠﻣﻌﻣﺎر ھﺎوﺳﻣﺎن ﻻﻋﺎدة ﺗﺧطﯾط ﻣدﯾﻧﺔ ﺑﺎرﯾس ,ﺑﺣﯾث ﺗﻛون
اﻟﺷوارع ﻋرﯾﺿﺔ وﻣﺳﺗﻘﯾﻣﺔ ﻓﻘﺎم ھﺎوس ﻣﺎﻧرﺑﺎﯾﺟﺎد اﻟﻧﻣط اﻟﺗﺧطﯾطﻲ اﻟﺷﻌﺎﻋﻲ ﻟﻠﺷوارع
اﻟﺗﻲ اطﻠق ﻋﻠﯾﮭﺎ «ﺑوﻟﯾﻔﺎردز» وھﻲ ﺷوارع ﻋرﯾﺿﺔ ﺟدا ﺗﻧطﻠق ﺑﺷﻛل ﺷﻌﺎﻋﻲ ﻣن ﺳﺎﺣﺔ
ﺑﺣﯾث ﺗﺷرف اﻟﺳﺎﺣﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ھذه اﻟﺷوارع ﺟﻣﯾﻌﺎ
وھذا اﻟﻧﻣط اﻟﺗﺧطﯾطﻲ ﯾﺳﮭل ﺑﺑﺳﺎطﺔ ﻧﺻب اﻟﻣداﻓﻊ اﯾﺿﺎ ﻓﻲ اﻟﻣﯾدان ﺑﺎﺗﺟﺎه اﻟﺷوارع
اﻟﻣﺳﺗﻘﯾﻣﺔ اﻟﺗﻲ ﺗﻧطﻠق ﻣﻧﺔ ﻟﻘﻣﻊ اﻟﺛورات ﻣﻣﺎ ﻻﺗﺗﯾﺣﺔ ﺷوارع »اﻟﻌﺻور
اﻟوﺳطﻰ«اﻟﻣﺗﻌرﺟﺔ وﺑﺑﺳﺎطﺔ ﻋﻛﺳت ھذه اﻟﻌﻣﺎرة واﻟﺗﺧطﯾط اﻗﺻﻰ ﻧﺗﯾﺟﺔ ﻣﻣﻛﻧﺔ ﺑﺎﻗل ﻋدد
ﻣن اﻟﻣداﻓﻊ ﺑدﻻ ﻣن ﻣطﺎردة اﻟﺛوار ﻓﻲ ﺣرب ﺷوارع «ﺷطرﻧﺟﯾﺔ او ﻋﻧﻛﺑوﺗﯾﺔ ﻣﺗﻌرﺟﺔ».
وﻓﻲ ﻣﻘﺎﺑل ھذه اﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ اﻟﻣﺗﺑﺎدﻟﺔ اﻟﻣﺻﻠﺣﯾﺔ اﻻرﺗزاﻗﯾﺔ وﺗﻛرﯾس رؤى دﯾﻣوﻣﺔ ﻧظﺎم اﻟﺣﻛم
واﻟﯾﺎت ﺳﯾطرﺗﺔ ,ﺗظل ھذه اﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﻣﺣﻠﯾﺔ وطﻧﯾﺔ داﺧﻠﯾﺔ .ﺑﯾد ان ھﻧﺎك ﻧﻣوذﺟﺎ اﺧر اﺧطر ﻓﻲ
ﺗوظﯾف اﻟﻣﻌﻣﺎر ﻟﺧدﻣﺔ اﻟﺳﯾﺎﺳﯾﺔ ﺿد اﻟﻔرﯾق اﻻﺧر وﺑطرق ﻗﻣﻌﯾﺔ
وھو ﻧﻣوذج اﺳﺗﻌﻣﺎري ﺧﺑﯾث ,ﻣﺎرﺳﺔ اﻻﺳﺗﻌﻣﺎر اﻟﻔرﻧﺳﻲ ﻓﻲ ﺷﻣﺎل اﻓرﯾﻘﯾﺎ
ﺣﯾث ﻗﺎم اﻟﻔرﻧﺳﯾون ﺑﺎﯾﺟﺎد ﻓﻛرة «اﻟﻣدن اﻟﺑدﯾﻠﺔ»اﻟﺗﻲ اﻗﺎﻣﮭﺎ اﻻورﺑﯾون ﺟﻧﺑﺎ اﻟﻰ ﺟﻧب ﻣﻊ
اﻟﻣدن اﻟﺗﻘﻠﯾدﯾﺔ ﺑﮭدف ﻋدم ﺧﻠق ﺗوازن اﺳﺗراﺗﯾﺟﻲ ﯾﺻب ﻓﻲ ﻏﺎﯾﺔ طﻣس ﻣﻌﺎﻟم اﻟﮭوﯾﺔ
اﻟﺗراﺛﯾﺔ ﻟﻠﺷﻌوب اﻟﻣﻘﮭورة ﻣن ﺟﮭﺔ ,وﻻﻋﻼء ﺷﺄن اﻟﻘﯾم اﻟﻐرﺑﯾﺔ اﻟداﺧﻠﯾﺔ وﻋﻣﺎرﺗﮭﺎ
اﻟﻣﺳﺗوردة ﻣن ﺟﮭﺔ ﺛﺎﻧﯾﺔ .وﻟم ﺗﻛن ھذه ﺳﯾﺎﺳﺔ اﺳﺗﻌﻣﺎرﯾﺔ ﻓﺣﺳب ,ﺑل ﻛرﺳﮭﺎ ﻋﻣﻼء
اﻻﺳﺗﻌﻣﺎر واﻻﻣﺑرﯾﺎﻟﯾﺔ وﻣن ﺑﮭرﺗﮫ اﺿواء ﺣداﺛﺔ »ﻓﺎﻟﺧدﯾوي اﺳﻣﺎﻋﯾل ﻛﺎن ﻣﻐرﻣﺎ ﺑﻣدﯾﻧﺔ
ﺑﺎرﯾس ﻟدرﺟﺔ اﻧﮫ ﻧﻘل «ﺑوﻟﯾﻔﺎردز اﻟﻐرب ھﺎوﺳﻣﺎن اﻟﻰ ﻋﻣﺎرة وﺗﺧطﯾط اﻟﻘﺎھرة وﺑﺣﯾث
ﻏدت اﻟﻘﺎھرة ذات وﺟﮭﯾن ﻣﺗﻧﺎﻗﺿﯾن – اﺣدھﻣﺎ ﯾﻌود ﻟﻠﻘرن اﻟﺛﺎﻟث ﻋش ر ﺗﺟﺳده ﻋﻣﺎرة
اﻟﻣﻣﺎﻟﯾك وﺷوارع اﻟﻘﺎھرة اﻟﻔﺎطﻣﯾﺔ وﻗﺻﺑﺔ اﻟﻣﻌز اﻟﻔﺎطﻣﻲ واﻟﺛﺎﻧﻲ ﯾﻣﺛل اﻟﺷوارع اﻟﻌرﯾﺿﺔ
اﻟﻣﺗﺳﻌﺔ اﻟﺗﻲ ﺗﻧﺗﮭﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﺳﺎﺣﺎت ﻛﺳﺎﺣﺔ اﻟﺗﺣرﯾر او طﻠﻌت ﺣرب وﻧﻣط اﻟﻌﻣﺎرة اﻟﻘوطﯾﺔ اﻟﺗﻲ
ﺗﻌﻠو ﻧﺻف وﺟﮫ اﻟﻘﺎھرة اﻻﺧر
اﻟﻣدﯾﻧﺔ اﻟﻘدﯾﻣﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺷﻣﺎل اﻓرﯾﻘﯾﺎ
ﺑﻐﺪاد رﻏب اﻟﺧﻠﯾﻔﺔ أﺑو ﺟﻌﻔر اﻟﻣﻧﺻور ﻓﻲ ﺑﻧﺎء ﻋﺎﺻﻣﺔ ﺟدﯾدة ﻟدوﻟﺗﮫ ﺑﻌﯾدة ﻋن اﻟﻣدن اﻟﺗﻲ ﯾﻛﺛر
ﻓﯾﮭﺎ اﻟﺧروج ﻋﻠﻰ اﻟﺧﻼﻓﺔ ﻛﺎﻟﻛوﻓﺔ واﻟﺑﺻرة وﺗﺗﻣﺗﻊ ﺑﺎﻋﺗدال اﻟﻣﻧﺎخ وﺣﺳن اﻟﻣوﻗﻊ
ﻓﺎﺧﺗﺎر "ﺑﻐداد" ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﺎطﺊ دﺟﻠﺔ ،ووﺿﻊ ﺑﯾده أول ﺣﺟر ﻓﻲ ﺑﻧﺎﺋﮭﺎ
ﺳﻧﺔ (145ھـ = 762م) واﺳﺗﺧدم ﻋددا ﻣن ﻛﺑﺎر اﻟﻣﮭﻧدﺳﯾن ﻟﻺﺷراف ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻧﺎﺋﮭﺎ ،و
ﺳﻣﺎھﺎ دار اﻟﺳﻼم
ﺑﻧﻰ اﺑو ﺟﻌﻔر اﻟﻣﻧﺻورﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﮭر دﺟﻠﺔ ﻋﺎﺻﻣﺗﮫ ﺑﻐداد ﻓﻲ ﻋﺎم ( 149 - 145ھـ)
710ﻣﯾﻼدﯾﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﻛل داﺋري ،وھو اﺗﺟﺎه ﺟدﯾد ﻓﻲ ﺑﻧﺎء اﻟﻣدن اﻹﺳﻼﻣﯾﺔ ،ﻷن ﻣـﻌظم
اﻟﻣدن اﻹﺳﻼﻣﯾﺔ ،ﻛﺎﻧت إﻣﺎ ﻣﺳﺗطﯾﻠﺔ ﻛﺎﻟﻔﺳطﺎط ،أو ﻣرﺑﻌﺔ ﻛﺎﻟﻘﺎھرة ،أو ﺑﯾﺿﺎوﯾﺔ
ﻛﺻﻧﻌﺎء .وﻟﻌل اﻟﺳﺑب ﻓﻲ ذﻟك ﯾرﺟﻊ إﻟﻰ أن ھذه اﻟﻣدن ﻧﺷﺄت ﺑﺟوار ﻣرﺗﻔﻌﺎت ﺣﺎﻟت دون
اﺳﺗدارﺗﮭﺎ .وﯾﻌﺗﺑر ﺗﺧطﯾط اﻟﻣدﯾﻧﺔ اﻟﻣدورة (ﺑﻐداد) ،ظﺎھرة ﺟدﯾدة ﻓﻲ اﻟﻔن اﻟﻣﻌﻣﺎري
اﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ وﻻﺳﯾﻣﺎ ﻓﻲ اﻟﻣدن اﻷﺧرى اﻟﺗﻲ ﺷﯾدھﺎ اﻟﻌﺑﺎﺳﯾون ﻣﺛل ﻣدﯾﻧﺔ ﺳﺎﻣراء وﻣﺎ ﺣوﺗﮫ
ﻣن ﻣﺳﺎﺟد وﻗﺻور ﺧﻼﻓﯾﺔ ﻓﺧﻣﺔ .وإﻟﻰ ﺟﺎﻧب اﻟﻌﻣﺎرة وﺟدت اﻟزﺧرﻓﺔ اﻟﺗﻲ وﺻﻔت ﺑﺄﻧﮭﻣﺎ
ﻟﻐﺔ اﻟﻔن اﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ ،وﺗﻘوم ﻋﻠﻰ زﺧرﻓﺔ اﻟﻣﺳﺎﺟد واﻟﻘﺻور واﻟﻘﺑﺎب ﺑﺄﺷﻛﺎل ھﻧدﺳﯾﺔ أو ﻧﺑﺎﺗﯾﺔ
ﺟﻣﯾﻠﺔ ﺗﺑﻌث ﻓﻲ اﻟﻧﻔس اﻟراﺣﺔ واﻟﮭدوء واﻻﻧﺷراح .وﺳﻣﻲ ھذا اﻟﻔن اﻟزﺧرﻓﻲ اﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻓﻲ
أوروﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﺳم آراﺑﯾﺳك.
ﺑﺮازﻳﻠﯿﺎ
ﺟﻮﺳﯿﻠﯿﻨﻮ ﻛﻮﺑﯿﺘﺸﯿﻚ دي اوﻟﯾﻔﯾﯾرا Juscelino Kubitschekﺳﯾﺎﺳﻲ ﻣن أﺻل
ﺗﺷﯾﻛﻲ اﻟذي ﻛﺎن رﺋﯾس ﺟﻣﮭورﯾﺔ اﻟﺑرازﯾل .1956-1961وﻟد ﻛﺎن ﻓﻲ دﯾﺎﻣﺎﻧﺗﯾﻧﺎ ،ﻣﯾﻧﺎس
ﺟﯾرﯾس ،وﺗوﻓﻲ ﻓﻲ .1976وﻗد اﺗﺳﻣت ﻓﺗرة رﺋﺎﺳﺗﮫ ﺑﺎﻻزدھﺎر اﻻﻗﺗﺻﺎدي واﻻﺳﺗﻘرار
اﻟﺳﯾﺎﺳﻲ اﻟﻧﺳﺑﻲ ،و ھو اﻟﻣﺳؤول ﻋن ﺑﻧﺎء ﻋﺎﺻﻣﺔ ﺟدﯾدة ﺑرازﯾﻠﯾﺎ .اﻟرﺋﺎﺳﺔ اﺗﺳﻣت
رﺋﺎﺳﺔ ﻛوﺑﯾﺗﺷﯾك ﺑﺎﻟﺗﻔﺎؤل اﻟﺳﯾﺎﺳﻲ أطﻠق "ﺧطﺔ اﻟﺗﻧﻣﯾﺔ اﻟوطﻧﯾﺔ" ،اﻟﻣﻌروف أﯾﺿﺎ ﺑﺎﺳم
ﺑرازﯾﻠﯾﺎ "دي metasﺑﻼﻧو اﻟﮭدف ﻣن ﺧطﺔ ،اﻟﺷﮭﯾرة اﻟﺗﻲ ﻛﺗﺑﮭﺎ ﺗﺣت ﺷﻌﺎر " :ﺧﻣﺳون ﺳﻧﺔ
ﻣن اﻟﺗﻘدم ﻓﻲ ﺧﻣﺳﺔ" وأﺿﺎف أن ﺧطﺔ ﺗوزﯾﻊ 31ھدﻓﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺳت ﻣﺟﻣوﻋﺎت ﻛﺑﯾرة :
اﻟطﺎﻗﺔ ،اﻟﻧﻘل ،اﻟﻣواد اﻟﻐذاﺋﯾﺔ ،واﻟﺻﻧﺎﻋﺎت اﻷﺳﺎﺳﯾﺔ واﻟﺗﻌﻠﯾم ،وﺑﻧﺎء ﺑرازﯾﻠﯾﺎ.
أﺳﺒﺎب ﺑﻨﺎء -٣اﺳﺑﺎب اﻣﻧﯾﺔ ،ﻓﺎﻟﻣدﯾﻧﺔ اﻟﺻﻐﯾره ﻣن اﻟﺳﮭل اﻟﺳﯾطره ﻋﻠﯾﮭﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺣﺎﻟﺔ اﻋﻣﺎل اﻟﺷﻐب وﻣﺎ
ﺷﺎﺑﺔ واﯾﺿﺎ اﻟﻣطﺎﻟب اﻟﺷﻌﺑﯾﺔ ﺳﺗﻛون اﯾﺿﺎ ﻗﻠﯾﻠﺔ
ﺑﺮازﯾﻠﯿﺎ -٤ﻧﻘﻠﮭﺎ ﻣن اﻟﺳﺎﺣل اﻟﻰ اﻟوﺳط اﻟﻐرﺑﻲ ﻟﻠﺑﻼد وذﻟك ﻻن اﻟﺣﻛوﻣﺔ ارادت ان ﺗﺳﺎﻋد اھل
ﺗﻠك اﻟﻣﻧطﻘﺔ ﻣن اﻟﺑﻼد ﺑﺗوﺿﯾﻔﮭم ﻟﺑﻧﺎء ھذه اﻟﻣدﯾﻧﺔ واﯾﺿﺎ ﺑﺗوﺿﯾف اﻟﻌﻣﺎل ﻣن ﺟﻣﯾﻊ اﻧﺣﺎء
اﻟﺑﻼد وﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﻣن ﺷﻣﺎل ﺷرق اﻟﺑﻼد وذﻟك ﻟﺗطﺑﯾق اﻟﻣﺑﺎدئ اﻟوارده ﻓﻲ ﻣﯾﺛﺎق اﺛﯾﻧﺎ ﺳﻧﺔ
١٩٣٣
-٥رﺑط اﺟزاء اﻟﺑرازﯾل ﺑﺑﻌﺿﮭﺎ
ﻛﺎن ﺑﻧﺎء اﻟﻌﺎﺻﻣﺔ اﺣدى اﺳﺑﺎب اﻻﻧﻘﻼب اﻟﻌﺳﻛري ﺳﻧﺔ ١٩٦٤واﻟذي اﺛر ﺳﻠﺑﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ اﻟﻌﺟز
اﻟﻌﺎم واﻟﺗﺿﺧم وھذه اﻟﻌواﻣل ﺳﺎھﻣت ﻓﻲ ﻋدم اﻻﺳﺗﻘرار واﻻﻧﻘﻼب اﻟﻌﺳﻛري ﺧﻼل ادارة
ﺧﺎﻧﯾو ﻛوادروس و وﺟو او ﺟواﻟرت ،وﺻﻠت ﻋﻣﻠﯾﺔ اﻟﺑﻧﺎء اﻟﻰ طرﯾق ﻣﺳدود وﻛﺎن ھﻧﺎﻟك
اﻟﻛﺛﯾر ﻣن اﻟﺿﻐط ﻟﻧﻘل اﻟﻌﺎﺻﻣﺔ اﻟﻰ رﯾو دي ﺟﺎﻧﯾرو ،وﻓﻲ ذﻟك اﻟوﻗت ﻛﺎن ﻋدد ﻗﻠﯾل ﻣن
اﻟﻧﺎس ﯾﻌﯾﺷون ﻓﻲ ﺑرازﯾﻠﯾﺎ ،وﻛﺎن ﻓﻲ اﻻدارة ﻛﺎﺳﺗﯾﻠو ﺑراﻧﻛو اول رﺋﯾس ﻋﺳﻛري ﺑﻌد
اﻻﻧﻘﻼب ،وﻗد ﻋزز ﻣوﻗﻊ اﻟﻌﺎﺻﻣﺔ ﺑﻌد ان دﻋﺎ اﻻﻧﻘﻼب ﻟرﺟوع اﻟﻌﺎﺻﻣﺔ اﻟﻰ رﯾو دي
ﺟﺎﻧﯾرو ,ھل اﻟﺑرازﯾﻠﯾﯾن ﻻ ﯾﺣﺑون ﻋﺎﺻﻣﺗﮭم اﻟﺟدﯾده ؟؟؟
ﻟﯾس ھﻧﺎك أي اﺣﺻﺎء او ﺗﺣﻘﯾق ﯾدﻋم ان اﻟﺑرازﯾﻠﯾﯾن ﻻ ﯾﺣﺑون ﻣدﯾﻧﺗﮭم ،وﻟﻛن ھﻧﺎك
اﺳﺑﺎب ان اﻟﺑرازﯾﻠﯾﯾن ﻟدﯾﮭم ﻓﻛرة ﻏﯾر ﺟﯾدة ﻋﻧﮭﺎ وذﻟك ﻻن اﻟﻣدﯾﻧﺔ ﺗﻣﺛل اﻟﻔﺳﺎد وﻋدم
اﻟﻛﻔﺎءة واﺧرﯾن ﯾﻛررون ﻧﻔس اﻟﻣﻔﺎھﯾم ﻋﻧدﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻧت ﺑرازﯾﻠﯾﺎ ﻓﺎرﻏﺔ ﻣن اﻟﻧﺎس
Barcelona’s Urban Planning
10-01-2020 - Wala Sahloul
Urban planning and
transformation in
Barcelona
The story below is a brief history of urban
planning and transformation in Barcelona,
Spain. It provides background and context
for a five-part series about the city’s current
comprehensive urban plan, which would
reclaim more than half the streets now
devoted to cars for mixed-use public spaces,
or “superblocks.” You can find .
Barcelona near the turn of the 19th century, hemmed in by a wall and
watched over by a citadel. Public domain;
How Barcelona’s walls
finally fell
By 1854, when the Spanish government
finally gave permission to take the wall
down, it was one of the most hated
structures in Europe. Townspeople
immediately went at it with crowbars and
pickaxes; it took 12 years to completely
remove it.
Then came one of the most extraordinary
and underappreciated chapters in urban
design history — a chapter that, though 175
years in the past, contains many omens and
warnings for Barcelona’s current efforts.
Barcelona’s original medieval walls are still visible in several parts of the
city; this is next to the Sant Antoni market.
Cerdà’s utopian plan
for Barcelona
As soon as the wall’s demolition was
announced, plans began for an expansion of
the city. In 1855, the central Spanish
government approved a plan by
architect Ildefons Cerdà.
Cerdà is a legendary figure in urban planning
circles, farsighted and progressive even by
today’s standards. (Among other things, he is
credited with coining the
term urbanización.) Trained as a civil
engineer, over time he developed a range of
skills, from mapmaking to surveying to
public health analysis. He was eventually
involved in virtually every area of the city’s
planning
However, there are public or public urban spaces that have certain
restrictions on access and mobility, such as public buildings,
educational and health institutions, and cultural centers. For example,
hospitals define rules for access, use, and circulation for their
locations.
The concept of space has been proposed on a
tripartite basis:
1. spatial practice (a space of perception arising
from everyday reality)
2. Representations of space (perceived space and
representations of space)
3. representative spaces (i.e. spaces that are
experienced through images, symbols, spaces of
emotion and action)
For Lefebvre, “Spatial practice, representations of
space and representational spaces contribute in
different ways to the production of space according
to their characteristics and qualities, according to
the society or mode of production concerned and
according to the historical period”
absolute Relative space relational space
“space is neither
• then it becomes a • relationship • can only be said to absolute, [nor] relative or
"thing in itself" between living the extent that it relational in itself, but
that has an things that exist contains can become one or
existence only because represented by whole depending on the
independent of living things exist relationships in circumstances” and on
matter. and are related to themselves with human practice Thus
• Then it has a each other other beings
structure that we
can use to classify
phenomena or
their uniqueness
▪ This approach allows one to view the city as a
square in which different people with different
interests face each other. Each person pursues
his goals, even if they relate to the individual's
own existence and social reproduction in the city the contrasts of space are
(for example, living well or achieving symbolic exploding for two reasons
gains related to the state of residence in a private
place
▪ The value of the different areas of renewable
social space is determined in the relationship the contradictions arise from
production itself and social
between the distribution of people and the appropriation, especially
dynamism at work disrupts
distribution of goods and services in the place from capital. At the same
space, markets it, sells it,
and divides it.
time, in the logic of
▪ Thus, city space is an expression of “major capitalism
objective social contradictions in physical
space”, in the form, for example, of the division
between the city center and its surroundings, and
tends to be reproduced in forms of
representation
▪ the right to the city expresses a demand for the provision
of social reproduction in the city, and is linked to struggles
against dispossession - referring to claims related to
housing, sanitation, mobility, education, health, culture,
democratic participation
▪ From this perspective, the right to the city as a condition
(the right to the city as a cry)
▪ movements against eviction, movements for the homeless,
urban reform, sanitation, justice. Environmental Fair City,
free lanes for public transportation, immigrant rights, and
cultural movements
▪ Institutional struggles to change urban legislation, which
would create special zones for social interests, social
housing programs, and programs to regulate land tenure in
shantytowns and low-income neighborhoods. Through
participatory budgets and municipal councils
Case study
▪ Definition : Urban segregation is the unequal distribution of
different social groups in the urban space, based mainly on
occupation, income and education, as well as on gender and
ethnicity. The quality of life and number of healthy life years
differ among these groups, too
▪ Why ?
▪ The widening gap between rich and poor is leading to
more segregation, with both groups living in homogenous
Special
Segregation
Health Migration
▪ Housing :Some major cities face a structural housing shortage with
spiraling property prices and rent in high-demand areas. This is leading to a
territorial divide whereby finding adequate and affordable housing where job
opportunities are is becoming increasingly difficult