Develop Dynamic Model - Part1

Development of Dynamic Models
& Tools for Interconnection‐wide

Simulations
ORNL Research Investigators: Yilu Liu, Stanton Hadley, Joe Gracia,
Travis Smith, Isabelle Snyder
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
June 17, 2014
1
Overview
• Vision
• Project purpose
• Significance & impact
• Technical approach
• Technical accomplishments
• Conclusions
• Future Effort
• Acknowledgements
2
Vision – Faster, Dynamic, On‐line Tools
Now Future Drivers
T&G Capacity Expansion T&G Capacity Expansion Increasingly Diverse
((Deterministic)) (Stochastic)
( ) Stakeholder Interests
System Protection
Days
((Preset))
Event Analysis (Manual)

Planning Systems
Hours
Automated Future
Stability
Voltage Control
Minutes
OD
Market Systems
Load as a resource
Renewables
Contingency Analysis Adaptive System Protection
(CA) (~1 minute)
Tighter margins
State Estimation (SE)
SCADA + AGC
Automated Event Analysis Increasing
& Decision Support for Compliance
p
Seconds
switching (~15 sec)

SCADA
Need for resilience

Next Generation SCADA
(System stochasticity)
Phasors
Probabilistic CA
Optimal Power Flow Predictive
capability
Months
( ~4 sec)
Protection
Cycles
State Measurement PMU

PMUadoption
adoption
Automated SCADA
Significance: Why Perform Dynamic
Modeling Analysis?
Dynamic Modeling Analyses
• Transient Stability: understand how a
system responds to a disturbance
• Small Signal Stability: identify oscillation
modes which can harm system stability
• Frequency Regulation: study frequency
response, which will change with new
Model Validation Using Measurement
types of generation based techniques
• Renewable Integration: evaluate impact of Industry
uses
generation variability caused by wind & MMWG

model for
planning
solar
• Control Strategies: serve as a large‐scale Error
Actual
FDR
data
base case for testing new and advanced
ORNL EI
control methods. dynamic
model
ORNL Grid Related Software & Models
Commercial tools Dynamic grid models
• EI (70,000+) models for year
• Siemens PSS/E, 2030 high wind
• GE PSLF, • Year 2015‐17 EI Low coal, high
• PowerTech DSA gas, high wind dynamic
• PowerWorld Simulator models (26,000 buses);
• Electrocon: Computer • EI MMWG model (16,000 bus,
Aided Protection 26,000 bus,Cu 60,000 bus);
Engineering (CAPE) • WECC 13,000 bus system;
• Electric Transients • WECC 200 bus system;
Programs ATP, EMTP‐RV, • 31 bus EI, 100 bus EI
PSCAD • 12 bus integrated all US
• Int’l: Egypt system; South
China Grid, India system
Custom developed 5
DOE’s Advanced Grid Modeling Program
Objectives
STRATEGY: Support mathematically‐based power systems
research to:
 Accelerate Performance – improve grid resilience to fast
time‐scale phenomena that drive cascading network failures
and blackouts
• Move from Off‐line to On‐line Dynamic Tools
 Enable Predictive Capability – rely on real‐time
measurements and improved models to represent with more
fidelity the operational attributes of the electric system,
enabling better prediction of system behavior and thus
reducing margins and equipment redundancies
• Goal to achieve faster than real‐time & look ahead
simulation
 Integrate Modeling Platforms (across the system) – capture
interactions and interdependencies that will allow
development of new control techniques and technologies
• Integration of CAPE/PSSE
6
Project Outline
Dynamic Simulation Capability Development
1. Create 2030 eastern interconnect (EI) dynamic model
a. Working with EIPC and EISPC
b. Develop dynamic models to understand dynamics of high
renewable penetration
2. Improve today’s dynamic EI model
a. Dynamic model validation & model improvements
3. Develop new wide‐area dynamic control capability for
wind and solar
a. Augmenting model library to study advanced controls
4. Integrating dynamic simulation into protection tool
(PSS/e ‐ CAPE)
8
Develop 2030 Dynamic Model for
Eastern Interconnection (EI)
Gefei Kou, Yilu Liu, Stanton Hadley, Tom King

Oak Ridge National Laboratory
June 17, 2014
9
Overview
• The Eastern Interconnection Planning Collaborative (EIPC) has
built three major power flow scenarios for the 2030 Eastern
Interconnection (EI)
• They are based on various energy and environmental policies,
technology advances, and load growth.
• Model size is 70,000+ buses and 8,000+ generators.
• This effort is to develop dynamic models based on EIPC load
flow cases by using:
1. All generic dynamic parameters
2. MMWG 2015 dynamic parameters,
only generic parameters for wind
10

Develop Dynamic Model - Part1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Develop Dynamic Model - Part1

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Develop Dynamic Model - Part1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Development of Dynamic Models

& Tools for Interconnection‐wide

June 17, 2014

Event Analysis (Manual)

switching (~15 sec)

Need for resilience

State Measurement PMU

generation variability caused by wind & MMWG

Gefei Kou, Yilu Liu, Stanton Hadley, Tom King

You might also like