The document discusses several approaches to managing working capital in an organization:
- Aggressive (restrictive) approach aims to minimize current assets and rely heavily on short-term credit to accelerate business cycles. However, it carries significant risk.
- Conservative (flexible) approach seeks to minimize risk by maintaining current assets above liabilities and relying on long-term funding. But it can decrease profitability.
The document also evaluates techniques for measuring working capital like EOQ and JIT inventory management. EOQ aims to minimize inventory costs but assumes constant demand and costs. JIT reduces waste but relies on consistent supply chains.
Finally, the document reviews factors like inflation rates and cost of capital
The document discusses several approaches to managing working capital in an organization:
- Aggressive (restrictive) approach aims to minimize current assets and rely heavily on short-term credit to accelerate business cycles. However, it carries significant risk.
- Conservative (flexible) approach seeks to minimize risk by maintaining current assets above liabilities and relying on long-term funding. But it can decrease profitability.
The document also evaluates techniques for measuring working capital like EOQ and JIT inventory management. EOQ aims to minimize inventory costs but assumes constant demand and costs. JIT reduces waste but relies on consistent supply chains.
Finally, the document reviews factors like inflation rates and cost of capital
The document discusses several approaches to managing working capital in an organization:
- Aggressive (restrictive) approach aims to minimize current assets and rely heavily on short-term credit to accelerate business cycles. However, it carries significant risk.
- Conservative (flexible) approach seeks to minimize risk by maintaining current assets above liabilities and relying on long-term funding. But it can decrease profitability.
The document also evaluates techniques for measuring working capital like EOQ and JIT inventory management. EOQ aims to minimize inventory costs but assumes constant demand and costs. JIT reduces waste but relies on consistent supply chains.
Finally, the document reviews factors like inflation rates and cost of capital
The document discusses several approaches to managing working capital in an organization:
- Aggressive (restrictive) approach aims to minimize current assets and rely heavily on short-term credit to accelerate business cycles. However, it carries significant risk.
- Conservative (flexible) approach seeks to minimize risk by maintaining current assets above liabilities and relying on long-term funding. But it can decrease profitability.
The document also evaluates techniques for measuring working capital like EOQ and JIT inventory management. EOQ aims to minimize inventory costs but assumes constant demand and costs. JIT reduces waste but relies on consistent supply chains.
Finally, the document reviews factors like inflation rates and cost of capital
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 9
1.
Appraise a range of approaches to managing working capital in an organization
(P4) Determining the sources of funding involves developing working capital policies. It also affects how these funds are distributed between current assets and liabilities. In general, aggressive and cautious tactics, depending on the degree of risk involved, may help a corporation finance its working capital more effectively (Borad, 2022) - Aggressive (restrictive) approach An assertive working capital strategy is characterized by a deliberate attempt by firms to minimize their investment in current assets while relying heavily on short-term credit. The objective is to maximize the utilization of funds in order to reduce the duration required for the production of goods, the rotation of inventory, or the provision of services. Accelerating the business cycle results in an increase in sales and revenue. According to Eric (2019), corporations tend to maintain minimal cash reserves, minimize the stock of slow-moving inventory and superfluous supplies, and prolong the duration of bill payments. Organizations with a goal of achieving rapid growth may choose to adopt this particular working capital strategy. Nevertheless, due to the significant level of risk involved, possessing robust business acumen and adept financial management skills are crucial. - Conservative (Flexible) approach An organization employs this approach solely when it seeks to minimize risk to the greatest extent possible. This policy entails stringent regulation of credit limits by the management to mitigate risk. Furthermore, it is customary for current assets to exceed current liabilities in order to ensure adequate liquidity. Long-term funding options are predominantly employed by organizations to finance both fixed and variable current assets. The utilization of short-term sources is limited to a negligible extent for low-risk purposes (KredX, 2020). Hence, implementing a conservative approach to working capital financing may mitigate the likelihood of encountering a shortfall in cash in the short run. However, this strategy may result in suboptimal utilization of available funds, leading to a decrease in profitability and impeding the growth of the organization. company. Enterprises operating in industries that are susceptible to fluctuations or seasonal variations, such as tourism, agriculture, or construction, may opt for cautious working capital strategies as a means of mitigating risk. 2. Evaluate different techniques for measuring the working capital position of an organization (P5) - EOQ The acronym EOQ denotes the economic order quantity, which is a mathematical expression utilized to ascertain the most advantageous quantity and frequency of inventory ordering. The objective of the EOQ model is to minimize the overall expenses associated with inventory management, which include expenses related to storage, delivery, and stockouts (Harbour, 2019). Advantages Reducing inventory costs and enhancing cash flow are two advantages of implementing the EOQ model for business. Companies can prevent overstocking or understocking inventory, which may result in waste, spoilage, or missed sales, by determining the ideal order amount and timing. Additionally, purchasing and holding expenditures like shipping, handling, and storage rent may be reduced for businesses. The EOQ model may also aid in streamlining the purchasing management process and making it more reliable and consistent. Disadvantages The EOQ model is subject to a primary limitation, namely, its assumption that demand, costs, and lead time for inventory are constant and known. This assumption may not be realistic in certain circumstances. For instance, if demand fluctuates due to factors such as seasonality, promotions, or market changes, the EOQ model may not be able to accurately determine the optimal order quantity and timing. Tarver (2022) notes that the EOQ model may not accurately reflect the costs associated with ordering and holding inventory in cases where there are variations in costs or lead time due to factors such as supplier issues, transportation delays, or discounts. - JIT Just-in-Time (JIT) is an inventory management approach that emphasizes minimizing the amount of inventory stored on-site. Rather than accumulating large quantities of products and raw materials, companies opt for ordering smaller shipments to replenish their inventory in accordance with their demand forecasting and order fulfillment processes. The implementation of Just-in-Time (JIT) is exemplified in the operations of grocery stores, as noted by Baluch (2023). Advantages The implementation of Just-in-Time (JIT) inventory management enables companies to curtail waste by eliminating surplus inventory and overstocking, both of which can incur significant costs and occupy substantial storage space. The implementation of the Just-In-Time (JIT) inventory technique can lead to a reduction in losses incurred from defective products by facilitating their identification and resolution due to low production volumes. Additionally, JIT can enhance productivity by reducing the time and resources required for manufacturing. Furthermore, the faster turnaround of stock resulting from JIT can lead to a decrease in the amount of warehouse or storage space required for goods. The implementation of JIT inventory management results in a reduction in the required storage capacity, thereby enabling organizations to allocate their financial resources to other business areas. This approach is particularly beneficial for smaller companies that lack the financial means to procure large quantities of inventory in a single transaction (CFI, 2022). Disadvantages The successful implementation of JIT requires companies to effectively monitor sales and forecast customer demand in order to mitigate the risk of inventory depletion. The Just-In-Time (JIT) approach is highly dependent on the reliability and consistency of the supply chain. The potentiality of the company facing adversity is contingent upon the supplier's financial stability. The absence of control over the time frame can pose a significant challenge for companies as they are compelled to depend on the punctuality of suppliers for every order, thereby exposing themselves to the possibility of impeding the timely delivery of goods to customers. Additional planning is necessary. In the context of JIT inventory management, it is crucial for companies to possess a comprehensive understanding of their sales patterns and deviations. Many corporations experience seasonal fluctuations in sales, which necessitate maintaining a greater inventory of specific items during certain periods of the year to meet increased consumer demand. Hence, it is imperative for organizations to incorporate this aspect while strategizing for inventory management, by guaranteeing that suppliers possess the capability to fulfill varying volume demands during different periods (Banton, 2023). 3. Review factors that influence investment decision-making to recommend alternative investment appraisal techniques (P6). The act of allocating financial resources is commonly referred to as investment decision. When engaging in investment activities, investors are required to consider a multitude of factors, ranging from subjective to objective, in order to make informed and effective investment decisions that yield favorable outcomes and advantages. Primarily, the paramount objective is to mitigate potential hazards that could potentially impact the welfare of investors (Pettinger, 2021). The subsequent factors may be cited as influential in the process of investment decision making: - Inflation rate When returns outpace the nation's inflation rate, investors search for investment possibilities in financial management. The pace of inflation over the long term may have an impact on investment choices. High inflation causes financial market volatility, which tends to breed doubt and apprehension about future investment expenses. Businesses will be unsure about the eventual costs of project investments if inflation is large and unstable. They can also be concerned about excessive inflation since it might result in future economic instability and a recession. Long periods of steady, low inflation have been associated with greater investment rates. Low inflation won't be sufficient to encourage investment if it results from a decline in demand and economic growth. Low inflation and steady growth are ideal (Vietcap, 2023). - Cost of capital Analysts and investors evaluate the prospective return on an investment based on its expenses and risks using the cost of capital. Financial analysts and businesses use the cost of capital to assess how well money is invested. Investment choices made by a company for new projects should always provide a return higher than the cost of capital required to fund the project. If not, the project won't bring in money for the investors. Due to their impact on the return on the company's assets and the risks taken to generate that profit, reinvestment choices have an impact on the cost of capital as well as other facets of financial policy. 4. Calculate investment viability using different investment appraisal techniques to inform long-term investment decision-making (P7). Project 1: Suppose company ABC invests $500,000 in a project. The project made $100,000 in revenue the following year. For five years, that sum increases by $80,000 each year. The cost of capital is 15% for this project. The actual and expected cash flows of the project are as follows: => IRR = 24% It means investors can expect to recover the initial capital at 24% per year over the life of the investment.