The World’s Largest Open Access Agricultural & Applied Economics Digital Library

This document is discoverable and free to researchers across the

globe due to the work of AgEcon Search.

Help ensure our sustainability.

Give to AgEcon Search

AgEcon Search
http://ageconsearch.umn.edu
[email protected]

Papers downloaded from AgEcon Search may be used for non-commercial purposes and personal study only.
No other use, including posting to another Internet site, is permitted without permission from the copyright
owner (not AgEcon Search), or as allowed under the provisions of Fair Use, U.S. Copyright Act, Title 17 U.S.C.
J. Bangladesh Agril. Univ. 10(1): 145–148, 2012 ISSN 1810-3030

Fish powder in instant fish soup mix

M. A. Rahman, M. Saifullah and M. N. Islam
Department of Food Technology and Rural Industries, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202,
Bangladesh. Email: [email protected]

Abstract
This study was conducted with the development of instant fish soup mix and finding out the effect of fish powder on it.
Ingredients of soup mix were cooked and dried up to desired moisture content. The drying or dehydration was done by using
a mechanical dryer (Cabinet dryer) at constant air flow rate and constant temperature with varying thicknesses. After drying
the dried products were ground to make powder. These were then mixed with desired composition. Here fish powder was
varied in composition in different samples and it was 5%, 10% and 15% in Mix-1, Mix-2 and Mix-3 respectively. For
preparing soup mix was reconstituted with boiled water. The result of organoleptic test was determined by ANOVA and
DMRT analysis to find out the best sample. (Mix-2) was adjudged to be the best by the panelists using 1-9 hedonic scale
and ranked as “like very much” securing score 8.0 which containing 10% fish power.
Keywords: Fish powder, Vegetable powder, Soup mix, Sensory evaluation
Introduction
Soup is the very fast form of cookery. Soup is probably one of man’s oldest foods, since it must have
developed about the time that boiling was found to be a way of cooking food. Soup is a food that is made by
combining ingredients such as meat, vegetables in stock or hot/boiling water, until the flavor is extracted,
forming a broth. Dry soup mixes are now an established food item in the world food markets. Instant Soup
Mixes are preferred more as dry soup mixes by consumers. As a dry product instant fish soup mix can be
stored for a longer period. Now-a-days Bangladesh is faced with serious protein energy malnutrition problem.
Millions of people suffer from serious nutritional problem due to acute shortage of animal protein and
vegetables in the diet. This protein deficiency can be minimized by supplying sufficient amount of fish instead of
meat. Instant fish soup mix can provide a certain amount protein in the diet. The muscle of silver carp
(Hypophthalmichthys molitriu) posses all the useful qualities to be used for the production of various value
added products ( Nowsad et.al. 1999). Among the value added fish products instant fish soup mix may become
good and testy food item to new generation depending on fast food. Silver carp fish was used in this study. The
study was carried out with the objectives of formulate soup mix as a complete instant food, examine the effect
of fish powder in soup mix, evaluate the nutrient specification and content of soup mix side by side drying
characteristics of ingredients.

Materials and Methods

Fish, tomato and cauliflower, sugar, salt, spices were collected from local market. H2SO4, Digestion
mixture, desiccator, cabinet dryer, soxhlet apparatus, kjeldahl flask were used in the study.
Preparation of dehydrated fish, cauliflower and tomato powder
Fishes were tested organoleptically. Meat of the fish was found translucent. Fishes were beheaded by
knife then washed with 1% brine solution and cooked at100oC for 10 min with 2% vinegar solution. After
separation of all bones, moisture content was reduced to 6% using a cabinet dryer (Gallenkamp model
OV-165) for 4 hrs at 55oC. For drying it was spread on flat tray at a thickness of thin layer. A fan passed
over a heater and trays containing the sample to be dried blew air. The velocity of air was 0.6 m/sec. The
dried fish was ground, packed & stored.
Tomato slices cooked and pulps were dried in a cabinet drier for 4 hrs at 60oC. Dried pulp was ground,
packed and stored.
Fresh cauliflower was sliced and blanched for 7 min at 95oC. Blanched cauliflower was treated with
Potassium metabisulphite (KMS) (@750 ppm) and size was reduced with hand. The slices of treated
cauliflower were placed in a cabinet dryer for 4 hrs at 60oC. The moisture content was reduced to 9.43%.
The dried samples were ground and packed.
Preparation of spices powder
Spices (cardamom, cinnamon, black pepper, cloves) were dried and ground.
146 Fish powder in instant fish soup mix

Drying method
Dehydration of the major ingredients was conducted as per the following method.

Mechanical drying
After preparation the wet products were placed in a thin layer of different pre-weighed trays and weighed
the tray with samples of known moisture content. The trays were placed in the cabinet dryer at constant
temperature. Fish was dried at constant temperature 50oC, tomato and cauliflower were dried at 60oC till
desired moisture removed. After the end of each definite time interval the trays were weighed. Since initial
moisture content was determined previously, weight loss was used as the extent of drying. Fish mash and
vegetables were dried different thickness (5mm and 10mm)
Mixing method of the dehydrated powder of the ingredients
To study the effect of fish powder on instant fish soup mix, three different composition of fish powder were
used in the mix with all the dried powdered ingredients (Table 1).
Table 1. Ingredients for different composition of fish powder with all the ingredients
Ingredients Mix-1 Mix-2 Mix-3
Fish powder 5g 10g 15g
Corn flour 39g 34g 29g
Tomato powder 17.5g 17.5g 17.5g
Cauliflower powder 17.5g 17.5g 17.5g
Salt 10g 10g 10g
Sugar 5g 5g 5g
Spices powder 5g 5g 5g
Testing salt(MSG) 1g 1g 1g
Total 100g 100g 100g
In formulation 1, 2 and 3, fish powder were taken as respectively 05g, 10g and 15g. Composition of corn
flour was changed respectively to retain the composition of other ingredients at constant.
Fish powder, vegetable (tomato & cauliflower) power, corn flour, spices, salt, sugar, testing salt were
grinding and mixing then packaging and storage.

Chemical analysis of the soup mix

The mixes of dehydrated fish powder, cauliflower and tomato powder, corn flour, sugar, salt and spices
were analyzed for their chemical composition. Moisture, protein, fat and ash contents were measured
using AOAC method (1984). Total carbohydrate content was determined by subtracting the measured
protein, fat, ash and moisture from 100 (Pearson, 1976). The results were expressed as the mean of
three independent values.
Reconstitution of the mix before consumption
In reconstitution water was added to the product which was restored to a condition similar to that when it
was fresh. To make broth from soup mix 300ml boiled water was added with 40g soup mix.
Subjective (sensory) evaluation of Fish soup mix
For statistical analysis of sensory data, soup mixes of three deferent composition were evaluated for
color, flavor, texture and overall acceptability by a panel of 07 trained panel members. Three
reconstituted samples were presented to 07 panelists and randomly coded sample. The test panelists
were asked to rate the different composition presented to them on a 9 point hedonic scale with the ratings
of: 9 = Like extremely; 8 = Like very much; 7 = Like moderately; 6 = Like slightly; 5 = Neither like nor
dislike; 4 = Dislike slightly; 3 = Dislike moderately; 2 = Dislike very much; and 1 = Dislike extremely.
The results were evaluated by Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT)
procedures of the Statistical Analysis System (SAS, 1985).
Rahman et al. 147

Results and Discussion

Composition of fresh fish and dried fish powder
The moisture content in fresh silver carp fish, mechanical dried fish powder was 77.8% and 7.89%
respectively. The ash content in fresh fish 1.85% and that was in mechanical dried fish was 12.97%. The
fat content in fresh fish was 2.07% and that was in mechanical dried fish 13.87%. The protein in fresh fish
was 18.37% and that was in mechanical dried fish 64.9%. Protein, fat, ash of dried sample were
increased but moisture content of dried samples were decreased. The higher concentration of nutrients in
the dried product is due to lower moisture content. The chemical composition of fresh fish & dried fish are
given in the following Table 2.
Table 2. Composition of fresh and dried fish powder
Parameters Fresh fish Dried fish
Moisture % 77.8 7.89
Ash % 1.85 12.97
Lipid (fat)% 2.07 13.87
Protein % 18.37 64.98
Composition of Instant Fish Soup Mix
Among the three formulations Formulation No-2 (mix 2) was taken for analysis for its moisture, protein,
fat, ash contents. The results are presented in Table 3. The moisture content in instant fish soup mix was
9.4%. The ash, fat and protein content was found to be 14%, 1.47% and 9.5%, respectively. The higher
concentration of nutrients in the dried product was due to lower moisture content.
Table 3. The chemical composition of Instant Fish Soup Mix are given in the following
Parameters Soup mix formulation no 2 (mix 2)
(10% fish powder)
Moisture % 9.4%
Ash % 14%
Lipid (fat)% 1.47%
Protein % 9.5%
Total carbohydrate 65.7%

Sensory evaluation of instant fish soup mix

The mean scores for color, texture, flavor and overall acceptability of three deferent amount of fish
powder in Instant Fish Soup Mix are presented in Table 4.
Table 4. Means of sensory evaluation of instant fish soup mixes
Sample No. Sensory attribute
Color Flavor Texture Overall acceptability
1 7.57b 6.71b 7.86b 6.71b
2 7.71a 7.86a 8.43a 8.00a
3 7.43b 6.29b 7.43b 6.57b
The means with the same superscripts within a column are not significantly different at p<0.05
Mix- 1: use 05% fish powder & 39% corn flour.
Mix- 2: use 10% fish powder & 34% corn flour.
Mix- 3: use 15% fish powder & 29% corn flour.
A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out for color preference and results revealed that
there was no significant differences in color (Table 4). The calculated F-value (0.1765) was lower than the
tabulated F-value (3.89). This indicates the color of the samples of instant fish soup mixes were equally
accepted and the numerical score varied from 7.43 to 7.71
Incase of texture preference among the samples (ANOVA) the results showed that there was significant
(P < 0.05) difference in texture (Table 4). The calculated F-value (6.7273) was greater than tabulated F-
value (3.89). This indicates the texture of the samples of instant fish soup mixes were not equally
accepted and the numerical score varied from 7.43 to 8.43.
148 Fish powder in instant fish soup mix

A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out for flavor preference and results revealed that
there was significant (P < 0.05) difference in flavor acceptability among the soups. The calculated F-value
(8.1972) was greater than tabulated F-value (3.89). This indicate that the flavor of different samples of
soup mixes were not equally acceptable (Table 4). As shown in Table 4 the flavor of Mix-2 (10% fish
powder) was the most acceptable among the samples and was followed by sample-1 (mix-1) (5% fish
powder), while the lowest score was given by sample-3 (mix-3) (15% fish powder).
It was apparent from the results of the ANOVA that there was significant (P<0.01) difference in overall
acceptability of the samples tested as the calculated F-value (6.5455) was greater than tabulated F-value
(3.89). As shown in Table 4 the results showed that sample-2 (mix-2) has highest overall acceptability
score among the samples tested and was followed by sample -1 (mix-1), while sample-3 (mix-3) secured
the lowest score. Sample-3 (mix-3) had the highest proportion of (15% fish powder) fish powder. Sample-
2 (mix-2) and sample-1 (mix-1) contained 10% and 5% fish respectively.
From the results it is found that in all respects sample-2 with 10% fish secured the highest scores and can
be ranked as “like very much”. Sample with 5% fish powder secured the second highest score for all
quality factors and can be ranked as ‘like moderately’. Sample-3 with 15% fish powder secured the lowest
score among the samples for all quality factors and can be ranked as ‘like moderately’.
All the products were equally acceptable with respect to color but were found different from one another
with respect to flavor and texture. Thus flavor and texture were over riding factors influencing overall
acceptability.
Studies on organoleptic taste test, showed that soup sample with 10% fish powder secured the highest
score in all respect and could be ranked as ‘like very much’. The soup with 5% fish powder secured the
second highest score for all quality attributes and was classified as ‘like moderately’ while the soup with
15% fish powder secured lowest score and was ranked as ‘like moderately’. The study clearly shows that
fish flavor and texture were overriding factors influencing overall acceptability of soup from fish.
It may be concluded that the product of instant fish which has higher nutrient value, can help to reduce
nutritional deficiency and can appropriately utilize the surplus of fish and vegetables production. This mix
also replaces animal protein by fish.

References
Jason, A.C. 1965. Drying and dehydration, vol-3, processing : part- 1, Fish as food (01-52).
Aminov, M.S. and Kajiakhmedov, M.N. 1981. Manufacture of tomato powder by foam drying. Konservnaya 1 Ovoschchesushil’naya
Promyshlennost. No.1:38-39.
AOAC. 1956. Official methods of analysis. Association of official analytical chemists. Washington, D.C.
Babalik, O. and Pazir, F. 1997. Application of SO2 in drying of tomatoes , Turky. Gida. 22(3):193-199. Bangladesh. 19(4):7-
11.Maccane, R. A. & Widdowson, E. M.1960, The role of fish in human nutrition. Special report series No. 297, Medical
Research Council, London. Cited in fish in nutrition. P.40.Ed. by E. Heen, 110 Fleet Stre
Begum J.A., Shams-ud-Din, M. and Haque, M.S. 1986. Study on the sun drying and dehydration of some winter
vegetable.Bangladesh journal of Agricultural science 13(2):117-121.
Candelaria, N.M. and Raymendo, L.C. 1994 Comparative drying and reconstitution characteristics of some fruits and vegetable
.central Luzon state university Munoz Nueva Ecvija. Philippines. Department of AGRIL. Engg . 77(3):321-326.
DOF. 2001. A brief on department of fisheries Bangladesh. Department Of Fisheries (DOF), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Faruk, M. and Provash, K.C. 1997. Study on the rehydration properties of dried cauliflowers. Department of Food Technology and
Rural Industries. Bangladesh Agricultural University. Mymensingh. Bangladesh. Project Report.January.1997:pp-88.
Nowsad, A.K.M.A.. 1999. Low-cost processing of fish in costal Bangladesh. BGD/97/017 Field DOC: 01/1999. Food and Agriculture
Organization of the United Nations.
th
Pearson, D. 1976. The chemical analysis of foods, 7 Edn. Churchill Lavingstone, New York.
Rastelli, Robert. January 12, 2005. The Star-Ledger. Soup 101 First, take an onion, and then make something that will warm the
soul. Section: Savor; Page 33.