Phenotypic Evolution

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

PHENOTYPIC EVOLUTION

Phenotype

 observable traits:
o physical appearance
o behavior
o mode of reproduction

Phenotypic Variations

 differences among organism in the observable traits


 variability in phenotypes that exist in a population

GENOTYPES AND PHENOTYPES

 discrete: variation in DNA


 height: affected by thousands of loci and environmental (nongenetic influences)
 genes  mRNA  polypeptide (protein)  phenotype

Phenotypic Variance

 measures variation in quantitative traits that are visible (e.g., height)


 results from both genetic and environmental
 environmental factors: cause of differences between identical twins (from a single zygote)
o differences: nutrition, blood pressure, position in the womb and the growth rate of the
fingers at the end of the first trimester

Quantitative Traits

 traits that vary continuously over a range of measurements (variance)


o polygenic traits: numerous genes confer the phenotypic expression
o numerical data
o example: height, weight, life span, size, yield

Qualitative Traits

 traits that are discrete (easy to measure values)


o monogenic/polygenic traits: one or few genes confer the phenotypic expression
o categorical data
o example: color, shape, presence or absence

HOW PHENOTYPIC VARIANCE IS INTERPRETED?


𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜 𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎 𝑚𝑚𝑒𝑒𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎
• Mean:
𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛 𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜 𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚
• Variance: the average squared deviation of the observations from the mean
  variance = data points are very spread out from the mean

Fitness Functions

 quantifies how selection acts on quantitative traits


o horizontal axis: value of trait
o vertical axis: survival rate for individuals with that phenotype
 used to explain the 3 types of natural selection
PHENOTYPIC EVOLUTION

MODES OF SELECTION

1. Directional Selection - one extreme phenotype is favored


 favors individuals at one extreme of the normal range
 most phenotypic differences we see among species are the result of this selection
 example: drought in Galapagos Islands  very strong directional selection on bills of the
finches
2. Stabilizing Selection - both extreme phenotypes are eliminated
 favors individuals with average phenotype
 individuals at the middle of the curve are selected
 individuals that are much smaller or much larger than the mean =  fitness
 example: birth weight
3. Disruptive Selection - average or intermediate phenotypes are eliminated
PHENOTYPIC EVOLUTION

 favors individuals at both extreme


 splits a population into 2 separate groups, and make intermediate individuals less
common
o can lead to formation of new species
 example: the probability of survival to adulthood in the black-bellied seedcracker
(Pyrenestes ostrinus) depends on an individual’s lower mandible length, a measure of bill
size

Correlational Selection

 selection that favors particular combination of traits


 example: northwestern garter snake (Thamnophis ordinoidese)

MEASURING THE STRENGTH OF DIRECTIONAL SELECTION

 evolutionary changes in means are often caused by directional selection


o important to quantify its strength
 Selection gradient (β)
o measures the strength of directional selection
 2 components:
1. Relative Fitness (ω)
- average number of surviving descendants of the original phenotype compared
to the competitive phenotype
• survival or reproductive rate of one the competing phenotype / survival
or reproductive rate of original phenotype
2. Trait Value
- amount of trait (e.g., number)

Selection Gradient (β)

 computed using regression (performed when there is a correlation between 2 variables)


o selection gradient value = slope (regression coefficient )
 if the selection gradient value is:
o (+) positive: favors the mean phenotype to increase
o (-) negative: favors the mean phenotype to decrease
o (0) zero: no directional selection is acting
PHENOTYPIC EVOLUTION

Artificial Selection

 humans selectively breeding plants and animals for millennia to improve food production
o selection by humans of a deliberately chosen trait (or combination of traits) in a
population

GENERAL CONCLUSIONS ON EVOLUTION BASED ON ARTIFICIAL SELECTION

 almost traits evolved when selected


- most traits in diverse species immediately respond to selection (at least within a year)
 selection can cause a trait to evolve far beyond its original range of variation
- changes in allele frequencies can cause a quantitative trait to evolve far beyond
 large populations evolve faster and farther than small populations
- large populations have more genetic variations than small populations
•  genetic variation =  individuals survive
 strong selection on 1 trait often has negative side effects on other traits
- evolutionary side effects (trade-offs )
- artificial selection in cows:  production of milk =  in fertility

Phenotypic Plasticity

 individual’s phenotype changes due to gene expressions caused by environmental cue


- usually improves individual fitness and most are quantitative traits
- can be irreversible (developmental and immobile organisms) and reversible (mobile
organisms)
 example: a carnivorous tadpole cannibalizes a typical tadpole of the spadefoot toad (Spea
bombifrons)
 example: reaction norms for pigmentation in the water flea (Daphnia melanica) differ between lakes
with and without predators

Plasticity VS Adaptation: How can you tell if a trait is a plasticity?

1. not heritable (not inherited epigenetic inheritance is an exception)


2. short term or developmental response within a single generation
3. arises through differential gene expression or other regulatory mechanism rather than natural
selection

Can we locate quantitative traits in a chromosome?

 yes, through Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) mapping


 Quantitative Trait Loci - regions of the genome that affect a quantitative trait
o from a single nucleotide to a segment of chromosome that contains many genes
 QTL mapping shows the specific location of the trait in the chromosome
 QTLs are mapped by identifying which molecular markers (e.g., SNPs or AFLPs)
correlate with an observed trait

You might also like