[ES]2 WS2-10 - Practical Safety Assessments

BHDCA

ATM STRATEGY OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

Safety Assessments
Vlado Juric, Safety Coordinator

Lisbon, 14- 16September 2010.

 BHDCA
AGENDA

1.CURRENT SITUATION
•SARAJEVO FIR - GEOGRAPHICAL SCOPE
•ATS RESPONSIBILITY FOR UPPER AND LOWER AIRSPACE IN FIR
SARAJEVO
•AIRSPACE CLASIFICATION
•TMAs

2. CHANGE
•ATM STRATEGY OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
•AIRSPACE ORGANISATION
•BH RTS 2
•ATM INFRASTRUCTURE
•ATM SYSTEM – SERVICES
•RADAR COVERAGE
•SAFETY ACTIVITIES
 SARAJEVO FIR - GEOGRAPHICAL SCOPE
BHDCA

Sarajevo FIR encompasses

the entire airspace over
Bosnia and Herzegovina
land areas and territorial
waters adjacent thereto
(European Regional Air
Navigation Plan, Doc.
7754).

Sarajevo FIR is surrounded

by Zagreb FIR and
Belgrade FIR.
ATS responsibility for Upper airspace in FIR Sarajevo BHDCA
(FL 290 – FL 660)

290to 660

290to 660
Upper and Top Upper airspace in FIR Zagreb and FIR
BHDCA
Sarajevo with CCL sectorisation (FL 290 – FL 660)
Lower, Upper and Top Upper airspace in FIR Zagreb and
BHDCA
FIR Sarajevo -Vertical Division
ATS responsibility for Lower airspace in FIR Sarajevo
BHDCA
(FL 100 – FL 285)
Lower airspace in FIR Sarajevo with CCL
BHDCA
sectorisation (FL 100 – FL 285)
 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA - AIRSPACE BHDCA
CLASSIFICATION
FL660
Airspace class
“D”: Sarajevo,
Mostar, Banja
FL285 Luka, Tuzla
CTRs, and Banja
Luka CTA
Airspace class
FL100 “E”: Sarajevo,
Mostar, Tuzla and
Banja Luka
TMAs,
Airspace class
Airspace class “G” applied to: Inside FIR Sarajevo from ground “C”:
to 10 000FT/FL100 out of: Sarajevo, Mostar Tuzla and Banja Control Area
Luka CTRs and TMAs, Banja Luka CTA, LQ R2 Manjača, LQ inside FIR
R21 to LQ R37 Sarajevo from FL
100 to FL 660
outside
* The height of transition altitude is 9500 FT AMSL, so FL 100 is use in lieu ofTMAs
10000 FT.
 TMAs in FIR Sarajevo BHDCA

TUZLA

BANJA LUKA

SARAJEVO

MOSTAR
 BIH AIRSPACE SUMMARY BHDCA

UPPER AIRSPACE
BiH DCA ZAGREB ACC FL 660 BELGRADE ACC
FL 290

LOWER AIRSPACE
BiH DCA FL 285
FL 100

ZAGREB ACC

8000ft AMSL
UNCONTROLLED AIRSPACE – Class “G”
FL 100
SFC
B&H responsibility
From 20 April 2007
BiH AIRSPACE – SUMMARY (2) BHDCA

CTR/CTA

TMA
TMA

Civil
activities

Military
training
zones

Restricted/
Danger
areas
 BHDCA

CHANGE
 ATM STRATEGY OF BOSNIA AND BHDCA

HERZEGOVINA

The overall objective of the BH Air

Traffic Management (ATM)
strategy is to establish a national
ATM system to facilitate air traffic
within the entire Sarajevo flight
information region (FIR) in order
that the international obligation
with respect to an efficient
provision of national air traffic
services (ATS) is fulfilled.
 ATM STRATEGY OF BOSNIA AND BHDCA

HERZEGOVINA (2)

Implementation of ATM Strategy of Bosnia

and Herzegovina involves the following
main areas:
a) Technical systems and equipment;
b) Human Resources development;
c) Procedures and methods of working;
d) Airspace Plan development;
e) Civil works;
f) Institutional framework establishment;
g) Safety Activities.
 ATM STRATEGY OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA – RTS
2 PARTICIPANTS AND SIMULATED ORGANISATIONS BHDCA

Participants: BH DCA, CCL and SMATSA,

Place: CRDS Budapest, December 2009

Three different airspace organisations were selected for RTS.

Organisation 1 (DFL 285 and DFL 325)

Organisation 2 (DFL 285 and DFL 325)
Organisation 3 (DFL 285 and DFL 325)
The major difference between Organisation 1 and 2 is the shape and form of the
simulated sectors.
BH DCA was responsible for work on LOWER and TMA.

For the FAB CE transition plan:

Organisation 3
BH DCA was responsible for work on Lower, Upper,Top Upper and TMA

The traffic samples (13th June 2009 - Saturday) - provided from the CFMU Data
Base, converted to IPAS using SAAM.

The traffic sample(s) was the peak traffic of the region on 13.06.2009 from 09.00
until 11.00 UTC.
Chosen Organisation: B&H Sectors Lower-ORG2
BHDCA
DFL 285 LOWER (GND – FL285) BHDCA
DFL 285 UPPER (FL285 – FL325)
BHDCA
ATM STRATEGY OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA – BHDCA
FINAL AIRSPACE ORGANISATION

The final airspace organisation of BH is depending

on the results of the co-ordination with Croatia and
Serbia.
The full interface between BH airspace and its
neighbors, as well as the surrounding sectorisation,
must be identified and agreed in order to provide the
full operational context into which the
implementation of the new BH airspace will take
place and to take into account European ATM
network implications.
ATM - INFRASTRUCTURE BHDCA

VHF
KOZARA
ACC/TMA UNIT II
BANJA LUKA

TMA TUZLA

VHF
BUKOVIK

ACC/TMA UNIT I VHF

SARAJEVO JAHORINA

VHF ATM SYSTEM

PLEJIN VRH MSSR
JAHORINA

PSR/MSSR
SARAJEVO

TMA MOSTAR
ATC SIM
 ATM SYSTEM - SERVICES BHDCA

MET FIS SAR TWR

ACC ___________
BL
CWP APP

NOF TWR
ACC ___________
SA
CWP APP

VHF/UHF RADIO

CFMU, IFPS, AFTN, OLDI, EAD ATM SYSTEM

CEATS, CCL, RADAR DATA
EXCHANGE
(SARAJEVO)
SMATSA

MSSR/PSR

TWR
AIS
MO ATC ___________
SIMULATOR
APP

TWR
___________
TZ
APP
 BHDCA

11 July, 2012 Presentation of BH ATM system 23

 BHDCA

SAFETY
ACTIVITIES
 ATM STRATEGY OF BOSNIA AND BHDCA
HERZEGOVINA – SAFETY ACTIVITIES

Safety activities include the implementation of Safety

Management System – SMS and the development of Project
Safety Cases.

The implementation of SMS includes the review and merge

Safety Management Manual s of the two CADs into one
according to the new institutional and legal framework and
regarding a minimum set of procedures required to go into the
operations.

The Project Safety Cases include the development of Safety

Cases for technical systems, procedures, airspace design,
and buildings. They also include the development of Unit
Safety Case.
 ATM STRATEGY OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA BHDCA
COOPERATION BETWEEN EUROCONTROL AND
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

Bosnia and Herzegovina through BH DCA and

EUROCONTROL signed a contract concerning
EUROCONTROL’s assistance during implementation
of ATM Strategy of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The
agreement covers ten (10) work-packages
corresponding to BHDCA relevant projects as follows:
S
 ATM STRATEGY OF BOSNIA AND BHDCA
HERZEGOVINA
COOPERATION BETWEEN EUROCONTROL
AND BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

The objective of WP10: “Safety assessments” is to

establish a safety management function in the future
BHANSA, to supply the documentation and support
implementation of SMS in compliance with
EUROCONTROL Safety Regulatory Requirements
additional safety management elements required for
certification according to EU Common Requirements
for ANSP.
Safety Organisation within BHATM BHDCA

Programme
BHATM
PIU Manager
PIU SAFETY
coordinator

HR SEP ATMS ATM/OPS MET CW

RISK / SAFETY RISK / SAFETY RISK / SAFETY RISK / SAFETY

expert expert expert expert
for ATMS for ATM/OPS for MET for CW

28
 Safety Responsbilities within BHDCA

BHATM Programme
BHATM PIU Safety Coordinator

The role of the coordinator is to take part in the meeting of the Project
Implementation Unit (PIU), to be the link between the top management of the
project and the safety experts who are in sub-projects (MET, ATMS, ATM/OPS,
CW, SEP and HR).

BHATM Project Team Safety Expert/s

Safety Experts are responsible for the day to day management of the BHATM
sub-project safety activities and performs various operational safety tasks.

29
 BHDCA

SAFETY
ASSESSMENTS
METHODOLOGY
 BHDCA
Safety Consideration

Project Manager
What is changing? Scope
presentation

What areas of the system are

Safety Issues
impacted/not impacted?

Safety Considerations What can we put on the table to make the

point?

What equipment/procedures/training will Evidence

be required?

What activities need to be carried out to

Safety Plan
produce evidence?
Initial Safety
Argument
What content/structure for the document
Safety Case
to be produced for decision makers?
 BHDCA
What is changing?

Presentation of the change by Project Manager

 BHDCA
Safety considerations

Microsoft Excel
Worksheet
What structure for the document to be produced for BHDCA
decision makers?
ILS Mostar - example
CONOPS
Assumptions
There is no evidence
that current operations
Justification
are not safe
To provide a landing navigational
Data provided by manufacturer(s)
guidance allowing lower operational
are trustworthy
minima

Arg0
ILS CATI operations Context of operations
(with DME) will be Mostar Airport/TMA
- RWYRWY34
XX
acceptably safe Tuzla Airport/TMA RWY 09
and

Arg1 Arg2 Arg3

Arg3 Arg4
Arg4 Arg5
Agr 5
Transition from
ILS CAT I operations
ILS CAT I (plus DME) ILS CAT I (plus DME) ILS CAT I (plus DME) current state to
will be shown to
has been specified has been designed has been implemented full ILS CAT I
operate acceptably
to be acceptably to be acceptably completely and operations
safely throughout
safe safe correctly will be
its service
acceptably safe
Specifications (call for tender)
FHA
•OPs Concept
•CONOPS
to be acceptably safe
BHDCA
The system has been specified

•Functional and performance requirements •Functional and performance requirements defined?

•System description •Safety requirements defined?

Design (manufacturer offer & building)

PSSA
•Technical solutions
•Procedures design
The system has been designed
•Training course design •System safety assessment to be acceptably safe
•Architectural design •System meets the requirements (FAT)

Implementation (technical work on site)

•Technical work (integration) After implementation the system
•System safety assessment
•Flight procedures verification has been shwon to be acceptably
•System meets the requirements (SAT)
•Training course delivery safe
•SAT

Migration
•Reliabliity and integrity acceptable (DOC 8072)
•HF and HMI acceptable
•System safety assessment Migration measures will make
•Staff trained (training records)
•Safety requirements for transfer defined? it acceptably safe
•Compliance with regulations
•Procedures published
•Flight calibration

Operations and maintenance

Operation and maintenance will
•Operations and maintenance procedures followed
•System safety assessment be shown to continue to be safe
•Performance monitored and assessed
•Safety requirements continue to be met? and mitigations introduced as
•Assumptions verified
necessary
•Safety criteria met
 BHDCA
Safety Plan
 BHDCA

Role Responsibility
Responsibility
Lead: Responsible for ensuring the assurance and evidence is provided Safety Case Owner
Project Manager
Do: Responsible for providing assurance and evidence
Manufacturer

Consult: Who should be consulted in the process

Head TECH Dept

Inform: Who should be informed of the outcome

Safety manager
 BHDCA

BHDCA

Safety Case for the

implementation of ILS
at airport XX

OPS and ENg Departments

 BHDCA

ATM STRATEGY OF
BOSNIA AND
HERZEGOVINA
SAFETY
ASSESSMENT
Produced
documents
BHATM Safety Documents produced BHDCA

Project Team ATMS

• ATMS Safety Plan v.0.3;
• FHA Report for DPS v.1.0;
• FHA Report for VCS v.0.1;
• FHA Report for VCS-VHF-UHF v.1.0;
• PSSA Evaluation Report for DPS v.0.1;
• PSSA Evaluation Report for VCS-VHF-
UHF v.0.1.

40
BHATM Safety Documents produced BHDCA

Project Team CW
• FHA Report for Civil Work sites:
- Sarajevo, v.0.2;
- Banja Luka, v.0.2;
- Jahorina, v.0.2;
- Mostar v.0.2;
• PSSA Report for Civil Work sites:
- Sarajevo, v.0.2;
- Banja Luka, v.0.2;
- Jahorina v.0.2.

41
 BHATM Safety Documents produced BHDCA

Project Team CW (2)

• Safety Case Report’s for Civil Work sites:

- Sarajevo, v.0.2;
- Banja Luka, v.0.2.

42
BHATM Safety Documents produced BHDCA

Project team MET

• FHA Report for MET v.0.1.

43
 BHATM Safety Documents in the BHDCA

development

• BHATM ATM/OPS Safety Case;

• BHATM ATMS Safety Case;
• BHATM ATMS-DPS Safety Case, v.0.1;
• BHATM FHA/PSSA Report for BIHAN.
• Unit Safety Case

44
 BHDCA

For final GO/NO GO decision making (and in the mean

time work planning) the results of the safety
assessments will be used to feed a USC.
 BHDCA

Thank you for your

attention

QUESTIONS?
 BHDCA

47