Terms of Reference CWP Final
Terms of Reference CWP Final
Terms of Reference CWP Final
1. The Department of Cooperative Governance (hereunder referred to as the Department or DCOG) invites qualifying bidders for appointment as service providers or
Implementing Agents (IAs) of the Community Work Programme (CWP) for a period of six (06) months.
2. Closing Date: The bid closing date and time are indicated in the tender advertisement and bid documents. Bids received after the closing date and time will not
be accepted. It is the responsibility of the bidder to ensure that the bid is submitted on time. The department will not be liable should there be instances of
disruption during the closing day and time.
3. Briefing Session: The briefing session date and time are indicated in the tender advertisement and bid documents. The briefing session is not compulsory. The
Department cannot physically accommodate the expected number of bidders and the briefing will therefore be conducted online. Interested bidders must contact
the SCM officials indicated below for the MS Teams link.
4. Contact information: Prospective bidders may not under any circumstances make contact with or engage any DCOG officials other than the officials indicated
below on any matter related to this tender. Enquiries must be directed to all the officials below. Enquiries sent to the DCOG officials below will be routed to the
relevant employees and responses will be coordinated and provided by the officials indicated below.
ENQUIRIES
Name: Ms. Nomvula Ntuli Mr. Siviwe Ndaliso
e-mail: [email protected]
The Department reserves the right to disqualify any bidder that makes contact with or directly engages any other DCOG employee on matters / enquiries /
questions related to this tender.
5. Project duration: Successful bidders will be appointed for a period of six (06) months. The Department reserves the right, at its sole discretion, to reduce the
contract period for one or more provinces by giving the appointed Implementing Agent at least one (01) calendar months’ notice.
Package 1: The following must be submitted once, regardless of the number of provinces bidding for:
a) Check List signed by the bidder.
b) Bidder Experience (Annexure A). Must complete attached summary sheet and provide reference letters with contact details of referees.
c) SBDs 1, 3.3, 4, 6.1 and all other required SCM documents.
d) National Treasury Central Suppliers Database (CSD) report, not older than 30 days (www.csd.gov.za).
e) Valid B-BBEE certificate issued by a SANAS accredited verification agency or sworn affidavit. Consortia or joint ventures must take note of the relevant sections
of SBD 6.1 regarding requirements for B-BEEE certificates.
f) Valid proof of registration with UIF from the Department of Employment and Labour.
g) Valid proof of registration with COID (a letter of good standing from the Department of Employment and Labour).
h) Audited annual financial statements for the two immediate prior financial years and an audit report expressing audit opinion from an audit firm registered with
Independent Regulatory Board for Auditors (IRBA) (a review report will not be accepted).
i) Approved assets management policy.
j) Approved procurement policy.
k) Proposed project team (Annexure B). Must complete attached summary sheet and provide detailed CVs that clearly indicate experience and qualifications.
Where a project team member occupies two roles, the CV (qualifications and experience) must make reference to the relevant positions or roles.
l) Pricing information (Annexure C). Price proposals must include 15% VAT and must be fully inclusive to deliver all services and outputs indicated in the terms
of reference (must use attached Excel template).
m) A detailed proposal and project execution plan covering all provinces bidding for. The proposal and project execution plan must contain all the information.
required to evaluate the bid against the requirements stipulated in these terms of reference.
n) A signed Joint Venture/Consortium agreement, where applicable (Special conditions paragraph 9).
The current CWP Implementation Policy effective from 1 October 2021 distributed as part of the bid documents and contain the detailed deliverables required of CWP
Implementing Agents. Prospective bidders are required to carefully study the CWP Implementation Policy and submit proposals that address all deliverables in the Policy.
Successful bidders will be required to fully comply with all legislation, regulations, policies and prescripts and must be able to perform all the functions indicated in the
CWP Implementation Policy.
The Department reserves the right to amend the CWP Implementation Policy at any time. Where such amendments have a material impact on bid or contract conditions,
the Department will, at is sole discretion, amend contracts or advertise a new tender to appoint IAs.
Bidders must note Part E – Contract management and special conditions, in particular par 2.6 related to consortia / joint ventures. Bidders that submit more than one
bid, either individually or as part of a consortium / joint venture will be eliminated. Both individual bids will be eliminated and in case of the consortium/joint
venture, both the consortium or joint venture and individual bid will be eliminated.
Where exceptions are allowed in terms of the applicable legislation, the bidder must attach an approved and valid Remunerative Work Outside of the Public Service
(RWOPS). This clause does not apply to bidders that are government departments/entities.
The Department reserves the right to use the information provided by bidders to engage banks, credit rating agencies and the relevant government institutions to
obtain information on credit records, criminal records, pending court cases, etc. Suppliers that show a history of poor financial/credit management and/or criminal
The Department reserves the right to apply the following criteria only to shortlisted / recommended bidders. Bidders must meet all four criteria below:
2. MANDATORY REQUIREMENT
•
MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS
Criteria Yes / No
2.1 Approved (signed) assets management policy submitted.
2.2 Approved (signed) procurement policy submitted.
2.3 Summary of supplier experience submitted (Annexure A).
2.4 Summary of project team submitted (Annexure B).
2.5 Price proposal submitted (Annexure C – must use Excel template)1
2.6 Proposal and project execution plan submitted
2.7 Audited annual financial statements for the two immediate prior financial years and an
audit report from a registered audit firm with Independent Regulatory Board of Auditors
(IRBA) expressing an audit opinion (Review Report will not be accepted)
NB: FAILURE TO SUBMIT THE ABOVE LISTED DOCUMENTS WILL RENDER YOUR BID NON-RESPONSIVE AND WILL BE DISQUALIFIED.
Note 1: Bidders must use Excel spreadsheet attached. Costing sheets completed by hand (in writing) or where formulas in the costing sheet were tampered with
will not be accepted.
4. FUNCTIONAL CRITERIA
Given the scope and size of the Community Work Programme (CWP) it is essential for prospective bidders to provide evidence of having managed at least one
project of a similar scope and size in the past. The scope and size of the CWP per province can be measured against the breakdown of the 2023/24 annual
budget per province provided in 4.5.2 below. A “similar” project in the context of the CWP refers to a project that required or involved all of the following:
• Engaging and working with local communities and/or community-based organisations.
• Managing large groups of stakeholders and/or beneficiaries (10,000 or more).
• A total project budget of at least R20,000,000.00 (total budget irrespective of the duration of the project).
• Managing of people, assets and inventory.
4.2.1. For the purposes of evaluation, the term “Bidder” shall refer to the Bidder as well as consortium of partners (if any). The terms “Bidder”, “Supplier” and “Service
Provider” are used interchangeably and has the same meaning for the purposes of this bid.
4.2.2. Bidders must have proven ability and experience of managing / implementing at least one similar project (as defined under 4.1 above). The attached Bidder
experience summary sheet (Annexure A) must be completed. Bidders are required to attach reference letters with contactable references for all projects listed
in the summary sheet. The project proposal must contain detailed information related to previous projects to enable the Bid Evaluation Committee (BEC) to
evaluate bids against the criteria indicated in these Terms of Reference. DCOG reserves the right to verify experience and to contact references provided, as well
as any other third party that could verify the experience and performance of bidders.
4.2.3. The past performance of bidders in executing similar projects will be evaluated using the references supplied by bidders as well as any other information available
to the Department. Below satisfactory performance on a particular project may only be considered if such performance was communicated to the bidder by the
contracting party and the bidder was given a reasonable opportunity to correct any deficiencies highlighted by the contracting party. The Department reserves
the right to reject a bid if the bidder failed to perform satisfactorily on similar projects or if inaccurate information is provided in relation to previous projects.
4.2.4. Local footprint: Bidders must show evidence of its ability to service the chosen areas of operation (Provinces bidding for). Details of established offices in the
province and/or a proposal/implementation model that would enable the bidder to successfully engage communities, local and provincial government across the
province. This requirement will not be considered during the bid evaluation process but will be considered during the contracting process with successful bidders.
4.2.5. Bidders must propose team members and must have policies and systems in place to ensure that assets and procurement processes are managed in manner that
is compliant with the relevant legislation, regulations, instructions and policies. The following criteria will be considered:
• Approved procurement policy (policy signed by the board or similar governing structure / authority). The policy must demonstrate the bidder’s ability
to conduct procurement in full compliance with the Public Finance Management Act, Treasury Regulations, Preferential Procurement Policy Framework
Act and Regulations, relevant National Treasury Instructions and DCOG policies.
• Approved assets management policy (policy signed by the board or similar governing structure / authority) demonstrating the bidder’s ability to manage
and safeguard departmental assets. The policy must demonstrate the bidder’s ability to manage assets in full compliance with the Public Finance
Management Act, Treasury Regulations, Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act and Regulations, relevant National Treasury Instructions and
DCOG policies.
4.2.6. Audited financial statements submitted by the bidder will be used to determine the bidder’s record in financial, assets and procurement management (bidders
financial health). Bidders that are unable to demonstrate a history of sound cash-flow, financial, assets and procurement management will not be considered
(bidder to obtain unqualified audit opinion and must be a going concern).
4.3.1. The attached summary sheet (Annexure B) must be completed for key members of the team responsible for overall implementation and management of the
project (regardless of the number of provinces bidding for). Key team members indicated in the proposal must be available for the duration of the project and
4.3.2. The following must be submitted for each of the proposed key team members:
a) Written confirmation of availability (signed by the proposed team member) for the expected duration of the project.
b) Detailed CV indicating qualifications, previous experience as well as letters of reference for previous employers (references must be contactable). The
attached CV template must be used (Annexure D).
c) All certified copies of qualifications.
4.3.3. DCOG reserves the right to verify all qualifications through the South African Qualifications Authority and to verify experience indicated on CVs with third parties.
4.3.4. Team members must demonstrate adequate experience through the number, types and geographical spread of projects/assignments undertaken. Detailed CVs
that clearly indicate experience and qualifications of all team members must be included in the proposal. Service provider must have knowledge of the Public
Finance Management Act (PFMA) and all procurement must be aligned with the Public Sector legislation and the departmental policy.
4.4.1. The bid proposal submitted by the bidder must include a detailed project execution plan. The bid proposal and project execution plan must address all the
deliverables and requirements indicated in the CWP Implementation Policy. The following key indicators will be evaluated:
• Overall alignment of the proposal and project execution plan to the objectives and requirements of the Department.
• Compiling and implementation of relevant site plans.
ToR CWP Txx/2022 Page 7
• Engaging local communities, provincial and local authorities, and reference committees.
• Registration of participants.
• Supervision of participants.
• Financial Management.
• Assets management.
4.4.2. The proposal and project execution plan should further outline how the bidder will utilise the CWP to address social challenges and support economic upliftment
relevant to the particular province, including but not limited to:
• Creating meaningful work and training opportunities – opportunities which will promote self-reliance amongst participants and a developmental agenda
within communities.
• Aligning useful work to municipal developmental plans / DDM 1-Plans.
• Prioritise unemployed youth, women and people with disabilities.
• Focused and relevant training.
• Adopting exit strategies that introduce business models for CWP participants.
• Enhance and adopt technology.
4.5.1. The total budget allocated to the CWP programme per financial year (1 April to 31 March) will be determined by the Department in consultation with National
Treasury. The budget information provided in the tables below is provided to guide bidders in determining the size and scope of the project. The actual total
budget and budget per province will differ:
4.5.2. The breakdown of the provisional 2023/24 annual budget per province (six months) is as follows (Excluding Agrarian programme):
4.5.4. Project management fees shall be utilised by the implementing agents/implementing partners for all overheads and operational expenses related to the
implementation of the CWP as specified in the CWP Implementation Policy. The project management fee must be sufficient to cover all overheads and all
operational expenses, including Site Management Staff (Provincial Manager, District Managers, Site Managers, Site Administrators, Technical Officers, MIS
Administrators, Asset Managers, Occupational & Safety Officers and any other position to assist in the administration of the project) and site operational costs,
site operational tools and stationery, audit fees, rental of site offices, insurances etc to be incurred by the service provider in the provision of the services as
stipulated in the CWP Implementation Policy. Ensure adequate alternative office space for site management where necessary. No additional costs / disbursements
will be considered by the Department.
4.5.5. Bidders are required to submit a detailed costing methodology to enable the Department to assess the Bidder’s ability to successfully manage the project. The
costing must distinguish between compensation of employees (stating the positions) and other operational costs.
4.5.6. If a service provider is at any stage unable to meet its operating / running cost from the Project Management Fee, the Department reserves the right to cancel the
contract and to allocate the affected site(s) to another service provider.
4.5.7. The project management fee is based on a fixed rand amount per participant (variable component) and a fixed rand amount per site (fixed component). The total
variable cost component must constitute at least 20% of the total PM Fee.
4.5.8. The project management fees (PM Fees) due by the Department to the implementing agents/implementing partners will be calculated as follows:
• Variable Component (VC) Wage Component: Actual number of eligible participants paid (regardless of number of days worked) during the particular
month (number of unique and valid identity numbers that worked at least one day during the month) multiplied by the variable cost amount indicated
in the SLA. Ineligible participants are excluded from this calculation.
• Variable Component (VC) Non-Wage Component: Actual expenditure incurred on procurement of goods and services multiplied by the variable cost
amount indicated in the SLA. Irregular expenditure is excluded from this calculation.
• PM Fee Due (PMD) = VC (WC)+ VC (NWC) for the financial year or contract period if less than a year.
• PM Fee Payable (PMP) = PM Fee due (PMD) less 5% retention fee. Retention Fee is payable at the end of the contract.
4.5.9. The monthly amount to be paid to IAs/IPs will be calculated as follows: PM Fee Payable (PMP) for the entire contracting period less PM Fees already paid during
the contracting period.
4.5.10. The bid amount to be used for the purposes of the PPPFA Evaluation will be the total PM Fee cost per province, based on the provincial budget, number of
sites and number of participants as indicated in Annexure C (Excel). This provisional budget is provided for the purposes of equitable bid price comparison only –
The actual budget allocated per site / province will be determined by the Department during the contracting process.
4.5.11. All prices must be inclusive of 15% VAT (if VAT registered) and must include all costs to fully execute all deliverables indicated in this ToR and the CWP
Implementation Policy.
5. General principle: In cases where bidders submitted insufficient evidence or where evidence is ambiguous, bidders may be requested to provide additional
evidence and may be re-scored based on this information. Additional information submitted may only be used as evidence to substantiate what is already
contained in the proposal. The costing and content of proposals may not be amended under any circumstances.
• ADMINISTRATIVE EVALUATION
Only bids that comply with all mandatory administrative requirements (See Part C-1) and that submitted all required bid documents (acceptable bids) will be
considered during the functional evaluation phase. Only acceptable bids will therefore be scored by the Bid Evaluation Committee against the functional criteria
indicated below.
• FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION
5.1 Functional Evaluation Stage 1: Bidder experience, policies and financial statements
The Bid Evaluation Committee (BEC) will evaluate all acceptable bids based on the proposals (including supporting documents) and bid documents submitted. Only
Bidders that meet all five (5) of the criteria below (deemed to meet each criterion by at least 51% of BEC members) will proceed to functional evaluation stage 2.
Bidders that did not meet these requirements will be eliminated.
The BEC will evaluate acceptable bids that met the minimum requirements during functional evaluation stage 1 based on the proposals and bid documents
submitted. The overall score will be expressed as a percentage (Total score obtained divided by the maximum possible score (20), then multiplied by 100).
The overall score obtained by a bidder will be the average of overall scores awarded by BEC Panel Members. Only Bidders that received an overall score of at
least 70% will proceed to functional evaluation stage 3. All criteria carry equal weight.
Each Bid Evaluation Committee (BEC) member will evaluate acceptable bids based on the proposals and bid documents submitted. The following scoring
system will be applied to the evaluation of all functional criteria:
Scoring system
0– Does not comply with the requirements.
1 – Compliance with 1 requirement.
2 –compliance with 2 requirements.
3 –compliance with 3 requirements.
4 – Exceeds requirements (where applicable).
Executive Manager / Team Leader provided evidence of (See Part C, par 4.3.4)
The BEC will only consider team members where all required information was
2.1 Weight 5
submitted (CV, copies of qualifications and written confirmation of availability for
this project).
Evaluation Score
0 = The Executive Manager/team leader meets neither the qualification nor the experience
0
requirements.
1 = The Executive Manager/team leader has a 3-year tertiary qualification but does not meet the 1
experience requirement.
2 = The Executive Manager/team leader has 3-year tertiary qualification and was the lead on one 2
similar project.
ToR CWP Txx/2022 Page 11
3 = The Executive Manager/team leader has 3-year tertiary qualification and was the lead on two 3
similar projects.
4= The Executive Manager/team leader has 3-year tertiary qualification and was the lead on 4
more than two similar project.
2 = The Finance Manager / CFO meets two (2) of the requirements above. 2
3 = The Finance Manager / CFO meets three (3) of the requirements above. 3
4 = The Finance Manager / CFO meets all four (4) of the requirements above 4
Bidders may propose one person that performs up to two functions indicated under 2.2, 2.4 and 2.5 above. The Executive Manager can perform a role of a team leader
but must not perform any other roles. There must be a dedicated Asset Manager who must not perform any other role except that of an Asset Manager.
5.3 Functional Evaluation Stage 3: Proposal, project plan and costing methodology
The BEC will evaluate acceptable bids that met the minimum requirements during functional evaluation stage 1 and 2 based on the proposals and bid documents
submitted. The overall score will be expressed as a percentage (Total score divided by the maximum possible score, then multiplied by 100). The overall score obtained
by a bidder will be the average of total scores awarded by BEC Panel Members. Only Bidders that received an overall score of at least 70% will proceed to the Price
Evaluation Stage.
All criteria carry equal weight. The following scoring system will be applied to the evaluation of all functional criteria:
Scoring system Guide
0– Does not comply with the requirements.
1 – Compliance with 1 requirements.
2 –compliance with 2 requirements.
3 –compliance with 3 requirements.
4 – Exceeds requirements (where applicable).
Functional Evaluation Criteria Stage 3
The proposal and project execution plan should outline how the service provider will
utilise the CWP to address social challenges and support economic upliftment
relevant to the particular province, including but not limited to:
• Creating meaningful work and training opportunities – opportunities which will
promote self-reliance amongst participants and a developmental agenda within
3.1 communities. Weight 10
• Aligning useful work to municipal developmental plans / DDM 1-Plans.
• Focus on prioritised unemployed youth, women and people with disabilities.
• Focused and relevant training.
• Adopting exit strategies that introduce business models for CWP participants.
• Enhance and adopt technology.
Description Score
0 = Addresses less than three (3) of the elements listed above 0
1 = Adequately addresses three (3) of the elements listed above. 1
2 = Adequately addresses four (4) of the elements listed above. 2
The proposal and project execution plan should indicate how the service provider will
engage multiple stakeholders in the implementation of the CWP. Stakeholders
include but is not limited to:
• Local Reference committees (LRC) or similar structures.
3.2 Weight 10
• Provincial CoGTAs.
• Local and district Municipalities / Metros.
• Local Communities and CBOs.
• Sector government departments.
Description Score
0 = Addresses none of the elements listed above 0
1 = Adequately addresses one (1) of the elements listed above. 1
2 = Adequately addresses two (2) or three (3) of the elements listed above. 2
3 = Adequately addresses four (4) or five (5) of the elements listed above. 3
4 = Adequately addresses all five elements listed above. In addition, the proposal contains innovative ideas 4
that will significantly enhance the impact of the programme.
The proposal and project execution plan should indicate how the service provider
will:
• Manage participants.
3.3 Weight 5
• Manage CWP Asset.
• Manage participants documents (ID, contract, verification form, registration
form, skills audit, proof of account, bank statement and timesheets)
Description Score
0 = Addresses none of the elements listed above. 0
1 = Adequately addresses one (1) of the elements listed above. 1
2 = Adequately addresses two (2) of the elements listed above. 2
3 = Adequately addresses three (3) of the elements listed above. 3
4 = Adequately addresses all the elements listed above. In addition, the proposal contains innovative ideas 4
that will significantly enhance the impact of the programme.
6. PRICE EVALUATION
Only bids that met all administrative requirements and the minimum functional requirements for all three functional evaluation stages will be evaluated in terms
of the provisions of the Preferential Procurement Framework Act and related regulations – see attached bid documents. The price and BBBEE evaluation (see SBD
6.1) will be conducted separately for each province.
7. AWARD
7.1. The bidder with the highest score (price points, B-BBEE contribution level points and specific goals) for a province will be the recommended bidder for the
particular province.
8. CONTRACT MANAGEMENT
8.1. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a service level agreement (SLA) with the Department of Cooperative Governance. The National Treasury
General Conditions of Contract (GCC) will form part of the SLA to be concluded between DCOG and the successful bidder.
8.2. If the parties (the Department and the appointed service provider) are unable to reach agreement on the special conditions of contract (SLA) after a period of
14 calendar days of the date on which the bid award is communicated to the service provider, then the Department reserves the right to cancel the award to
the service provider and to appoint the next successful bidder.
8.4. No amendments to the SLA or any variation, waiver, relaxation or suspension of any of the provisions thereof shall have any force or effect, unless reduced to
writing and signed by both parties.
9.1. The Department may, at its sole discretion, cancel this bid.
9.2. The Department intends to award the bid per province (one service provider per province). The Department however reserves the right to appoint the same
service provider to more than one province.
9.3. In the event of one bidder being the recommended bidder for more than one province, the Department reserves the right to appoint bidders that obtained the
second or third highest PPPFA scores and to consider total scores for functional criteria in the final decision-making process.
9.4. The period of thirty days (30 days) referred to in the General Conditions of Contract paragraph 27.2 applies (attached as annexure). If the service provider is
found to have engaged in fraudulent activities or caused the Department to incur irregular expenditure, the Department reserves the right to cancel the
agreement with immediate effect. Repercussions for the conduct of the Service Provider referred to above may include blacklisting of the Service Provider thus
preventing them from doing business with government for a period of 10 years.
9.5. In order to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the Programme, the Department is continuously reviewing the CWP model and may therefore from time
to time require the implementation of additional or revised operational procedures and policies.
9.6. The Department may, at its own discretion, require that each employee of appointed services providers as well as each contractor or other participant or
beneficiary of the CWP, sign a code of conduct to promote ethical behaviour. The Department may, at its sole discretion, prohibit any person found to be in
breach of such code of conduct from further participation or involvement in the Programme.
10.2. Without detracting from the ambit and extent of the functions and services contained in the CWP Implementation Policy it is specifically noted that the IA shall:
a) Recruit participants in accordance with applicable policies and guidelines and enrol qualifying participants on the applicable system (s).
b) Procure, distribute, and keep safe protective gear/clothing, site inventory and equipment, tools and consumables necessary for participants to perform
the useful work at each CWP site.
c) Ensure adequate tools (printers etc) and materials for site staff to undertake their administrative work effectively.
d) Ensure effective asset management towards a complete and accurate asset register for each site.
e) Ensure effective stakeholders relation management in each province especially with respect to provincial management committee.
f) Ensure effective oversight especiallly with respect to LRC functionality (inclusive of secretariat services)
g) Ensure effective monitoring and reporting and implementation at site level.
h) Ensure effective site business planning and implementation at site level.
Should the IA fail to adopt sound and recognised audit practices and / or if any audit report is found to be inadequate by the Department, the IA may be
requested to redo the audit such that it complies with the Department's requirements at the IA's own cost.
ToR CWP Txx/2022 Page 19
10.4. The IA shall protect all personal information and handle all such information compliance with the provisions of the Protection of Personal Information Act No.
4 of 2013 and related regulations.
10.5. The IA shall respect and protect all confidential CWP information it is exposed to during the course of the SLA.
Supplier Name
Document Check
National Treasury Central Suppliers Database (CSD) report not older than 30 days
Tax Compliant (as indicated on CSD) or verified through SARS
Valid B-BBEE certificate issued by a SANAS accredited verification agency or sworn affidavit
Invitation to bid (SBD 1) completed and signed
Pricing Schedule (Amended SBD 3.3) competed. Bid prices in SBD 3.3 aligned to Annexure C
Declaration of interest (SBD 4) completed and signed (2022 version)
Preference Points Claim (SBD 6.1) completed and signed
Valid proof of registration with UIF attached.
Valid proof of registration with COID (Letter of good standing from the Department of Labour) attached.
Proof of banking details (banking details indicated as verified on CSD)
Audited financial statements for the two immediate prior financial years and a confirmation letter from a
registered audit firm.
Approved (signed) assets management policy attached
Approved (singed) procurement policy attached
Summary of bidder experience submitted (Annexure A).
Reference letters with contact details of referees submitted for projects listed in Annexure A
Summary of project team submitted (Annexure B)
CVs / qualifications submitted for al project team members
Signed confirmation of availability submitted for all project team members
Proposal and project execution plan submitted
Approved and valid Remunerative Work Outside of the Public Service (RWOPS) attached for all
persons/owners/directors in the service of the state. (Where applicable)
Price proposal submitted (Annexure C – must use Excel template)
A signed Joint Venture/Consortium agreement, where applicable (Special conditions paragraph 9)
Declaration
• I have read and agree to the General Conditions of Contract related to Government procurement (Available on
DCOG tenders web page or from National Treasury).
• I have studied, accurately completed and submitted all the documents indicated in the above checklist.
• I have read and agree with the conditions applicable to all bids as contained in this document.
• I am the authorised signatory of the applicant.
Signature Date
Name of Signatory
Designation of Signatory
Name of bidder (if different)
Contracting party Project title and description Start date End date Budget
(Company/entity name)
Bidders must ensure that their proposals contain details of how the projects listed above are relevant to the objectives of the CWP.
Bidders must attach reference letters and/or contactable references for projects listed above.
Role Surname, RSA ID Number Highest Qualification Current Employer Total Year of Total Year of
Name Experience Experience
in similar
projects
Executive Manager / Team
Leader
Finance Manager / CFO
Procurement Manager
Assets Manager
Team member 1
Team member 2
Team member 3
Team member 4
Attach detailed CV as well as confirmation of availability for each person listed above. The CV must cover the following as minimum:
▪ Personal Details
▪ Qualification and duration of the qualification
▪ Experience indicating the employer, role (position), description of duties and number of years for each role. The experience should focus on those relevant to
the project.
Attach copies of qualifications for Executive Manager / Team Leader, Finance Manager / CFO, Procurement Manager, Asset Manager and other members.
Information obtained from the CSD report will be used to verify the criminal records and credit status of directors/owners of the supplier, where applicable.
Item Details
Full Name
Surname
ID Number
Qualification Qualification 1: (Attach certified copy)
Name of Qualification:
Institution:
Year Obtained:
Qualification 2: (Attach certified copy)
Name of Qualification:
Institution:
Year Obtained:
Experience Name of Organisation:
Period from and to:
Total Experience:
Position:
Brief Description of the role linked to CWP:
Experience Name of Organisation:
Period from and to:
Total Experience:
Position:
Brief Description of the role linked to CWP:
If the template does not allow more information, you are at liberty to add more blocks to accommodate entire information.