Designofa 75 K WSwitched Reluctance Motor Drive System
Designofa 75 K WSwitched Reluctance Motor Drive System
Designofa 75 K WSwitched Reluctance Motor Drive System
net/publication/220922231
CITATIONS READS
10 3,258
3 authors, including:
Jiangbiao He
University of Kentucky
70 PUBLICATIONS 1,082 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Jiangbiao He on 01 June 2014.
Abstract—A four-phase 8/6 pole and 75kW switched reluctance the phase current and the motor speed of SRM, and its
motor drive based on 32-bit digital signal processor property can directly affect the performance of SRD system.
TMS320F2812 is designed. The details of the controller design Detector module generally includes rotor position detection
and analysis are discussed. In addition, aiming at solving the and winding current detection, and it functions as providing
nonlinear problems of the switched reluctance motor, fuzzy-PI the essential information of rotor position and the switch
hybrid algorithm is presented to control the motor speed and state of motor winding.
the phase current. Experimental results show that the
hardware and software design of the switched reluctance drive
system are reasonable, and the proposed fuzzy-PI double
closed-loop control strategy is feasible and correct.
I. INTRODUCTION
Switched reluctance motor drive (SRD) has been Fig.1 Structure of four-phase 8/6 pole SRM
regarded as one of the promising speed-adjusting driving
systems since 1980s. It has become a competitor to the The main function of SRD system is to regulate the SRM
conventional ac or dc motor drive because of its nature of speed to the required parameters, and torque control is the
simplicity, robustness, high efficiency and high power crucial point for a driving system. The SRD system has
density. With much market potential, products of switched many controllable parameters, such as turn-on angle, turn-off
reluctance motor (SRM) have been used in many fields, such angle, phase voltage and phase current. Accordingly, control
as driving electric vehicle, household appliances, aviation strategies of SRD mainly include angular position control,
industry, servo system, etc. However, owing to the severe chopped current control and voltage pulse width modulation
nonlinear problems caused by magnetic saturation, eddy (PWM) control. Angular position control refers to
effect and hysteresis characteristic of SRM, it is difficult to controlling the speed and torque of SRM by regulating the
establish accurate mathematical model for SRM [1]. In turn-on angle and turn-off angle of main switch devices
addition, the structure and parameters of SRM are variable while keeping the input voltage unchanged. Angular position
with the change of control strategy [2]. Hence, it is very control strategy is very suitable for high-speed, efficient and
challenging to obtain sound controlling performance by torque optimal control, but not for low-speed control because
using the purely traditional PID strategy. With the view of of the high current peak. Chopped current control is realized
solving these problems, this paper presents the fuzzy-PI by controlling the switch devices IGBT to limit the winding
strategy by combining PID algorithm with fuzzy algorithm, current peak, so as to achieve torque control while keeping
and designs a four-phase, 8/6 pole SRD based on advanced the turn-on angle and turn-off angle unchanged. Chopped
32-bit digital signal processor (DSP) TMS320F2812. current control strategy is adequate for low-speed regulating
Experimental results show that the scheme can solve to a system. As for voltage PWM control, this strategy is
certain extent the problems caused by SRM nonlinear implemented by controlling PWM duty cycle to adjust wind
features. voltage while keeping the turn-on angle and turn-off angle
unchanged. The advantages of voltage PWM control lie in
II. SYSTEM STRUCTURE AND CONTROL that it can indirectly regulate the winding current by
STRATEGY adjusting the average voltage value of phase windings, and it
The SRD system is mainly composed of SRM, power is propitious to both high-speed drive system and low-speed
converter, controller and detector. The structure of SRM is drive system. Moreover, it has fast dynamic response on
shown in Fig.1. It’s a four-phase, 8/6 pole SRM. Power anti-load disturbance, which is beneficial for achieving
converter is mainly responsible for energy transfer by sound SRD operation performance. Considering all these
controlling the switch of the motor’s winding current. characteristics, this paper adopts voltage PWM control as the
Controller is the core part of SRD system, which can adjust control strategy.
446
C. Phase current detection TABLE I. FUZZY CONTROL RULE TABLE
447
the current of a-phase starts rising rapidly when a-phase is
energized, and significant chopper phenomenon can be seen
during the process. The current value begins to decrease to
zero dramatically when a-phase is blocked. The short current
reflowing time is beneficial for the motor’s practical
operation. But the current peak value pulse is relatively high,
which will affect the reliability of switching devices.
Besides, the rising velocity of phase current is not fast
enough, because of the limitation of maximum PWM duty
cycle. All these shortcomings will be improved in the later
experiments.
Fig.12 shows the static torque curve of SRD, which
indicates if the machine is capable to start from every rotor
position. The dotted line represents the actual measuring
value of torque variation with the rotor position under the
phase current of 30A, while the solid line represents the
calculated value, which is calculated via using ANSYS
infinite element analysis software under the same condition.
Fig.8. Flowchart of main program and A/D interruption As can be seen from the figure, the calculated value is larger
than the actual measuring value, which is probably because
two-dimensional rather than three-dimensional model is
adopted in finite element calculation and the motor's end
effect is ignored. The torque curve demonstrates that the
stator pole coincides with the rotor pole within the range of
0~8 mechanical degrees, and the output torque value is
relatively little in this range. However, from 7 degrees to 9
degrees, the stator pole begins to coincide with the rotor
pole. Beyond 9 degrees, the torque value gets to increase
rapidly. As the degree increases, the output torque value
decreases, until the torque value drops to zero at 30
mechanical-degree point.
448
VI. CONCLUSION
In this paper, a four-phase 75kW switched reluctance
drive based on 32-bit DSP TMS320F2812 is designed. In
addition, double closed-loop control strategy of fuzzy-PI
algorithm for the drive system has been presented, which
aims to solve the problem of difficult control caused by SRM
nonlinear feature. Experimental results show that, the
(c) hardware and software design of the SRD system are
reasonable, and the proposed fuzzy-PI controlling strategy is
feasible and correct. This paper presents a new direction in
the advanced nonlinear controller design of a switched
reluctance drive system.
REFERENCES
[1] Bose, B. K., “Power electronics and motion control-technology status
and recent trends.” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 29, 5,
pp. 902–909, Sept./Oct. 1993
(d)
[2] Buja, G. S., Menis, R., and Valla, M. I., “Variable structure control of
an SRM drive.” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 40, 1,
Fig.11. The measured phase current waveform of the SRM pp. 56–63, Feb. 1993
(Phase voltage: dc 100V, phase current: 25A)
[3] Ge, B., Wang, X., Su, P., and Jiang, J., “Nonlinear internal-model
(a) a-phase current (b) b-phase current
control for switched reluctance drives.” IEEE Transactions on Power
(c) c-phase current (d) d-phase current Electronics, 17, 3, pp. 379–388, May 2002
[4] Bolognani, S., and Zigliotto, M., “Fuzzy logic control of a switched
reluctance motor drive.” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications,
32, 5, pp. 1063–1068, Sept./Oct. 1996
[5] Panda, S. K., and Dash, P. K., “Application of nonlinear control to
switched reluctance motors: A feedback linearisation approach.”
IEEE Proceedings-Electric Power Applications, 143, 5, pp. 371–379,
Sept.1996
[6] Spong, M. I., Marino, R., Peresada, S. M., and Taylor, D. G.,
“Feedback linearizing control of switched reluctance motors.” IEEE
Transactions on Automatic Control, 32, 5, pp. 371–379, May 1987
[7] J. Reinert, R. B. Inderka, M. Menne, and R.W. De Doncker,
“Optimizingperformance in switched reluctance drives,” IEEE Ind.
Applicat. Mag.,vol. 6, pp. 63–70, July/Aug. 2000.
449