IJRCS202105010 Fullarticle
IJRCS202105010 Fullarticle
IJRCS202105010 Fullarticle
net/publication/352063609
CITATIONS READS
0 611
1 author:
Manoj Das
University of Hyderabad
2 PUBLICATIONS 0 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Manoj Das on 02 June 2021.
Abstract: Material culture be it prehistoric artefacts or present day traditional crafts are the products of human
physical and mental constructs, fulfilling socio-ecological functions, regulating social relations and giving
symbolic meaning to their ideational world. Weaving and other handicrafts are such material culture through
which humans have not only earned a living but have also reflected the mental and ideational environment
under which art and designs are produced. The present paper therefore makes an attempt to understand the
socio-cultural significance of handicrafts of India by taking into account two case studies, one on the
Padmashali weaving community of South Indian state of Telangana and another on the Jaapi artisans of
India’s North-East state of Assam, by reflecting on the symbolic meaning and attributes that the producers
portray in their traditional crafts. The paper is mainly a representation of weaving and Jaapi handicrafts as
objects of socio-cultural identity of a community apart from being treated as objects of securing livelihoods
Key Words: Pochampally Ikkat, Jaapi Handicraft, Cultural Products, Symbolic Meanings, Identity.
1. INTRODUCTION:
Design in any form of craft cannot be just considered a piece of object embroidered but something which has
a symbolic utility. Symbols assigned to the cultural objects of representation can be used as strong tool for social
messages or voices to the people. For example, Mahatma Gandhi’s use of charkha, the spinning wheel during the
freedom struggle became the symbol of national integration. In consumer culture where designs become a highly
visible marker of choices, particular social and class structure tend to possess distinctive taste preferences for certain
motifs and objects over others and hence these preferred motifs and objects become the marker of aesthetic value and
social identity (Bourdieu, 1984¹; Woodward, 2001²). These objects are assigned cultural meanings in the contexts of
narratives of self, identity and biography in which they are embedded whereby social actors go about actively
constructing linkages between their ideational and physical environment (Gibson, 1986³; Harré, 20024). Similarly,
textile and handicraft objects can be interpreted symbolically as having their realistic and abstract communicative
qualities. In this regard, Padmashali weavers of Telangana and Jaapi Artisans of Assam can be studied in order to
trace the mental constructs and social implications of the art and designs they assign in their objects of representations
and consumptions. Handicraft communities such as traditional weavers and agricultural artisans possess the culturally
learned language of creative symbolism within the medium of their produced items and their creative agency as
designer, weaver, finisher and owner (Femenias et al., 19875; Heckman, 20036). These utilitarian objects of everyday
use has great ritualistic cultural importance and become a strong tool for visual storytelling about the socio-ecological
setting of those creators as art holds creative space and time cross culturally through both realistic and symbolic
expressions (Jung, 19687). Traditional handicrafts as material representation of values and worldviews preserve the
cultural identity of a community or a region in particular and national identity in general and acts as the educative tool
for the present generation about the socio-ecological life of the past generation of the producer culture (Peterson,
19848; Seidman, 19909).
Cultural Symbolism which the symbolic and interpretive anthropologists developed over time focuses on how
people give meanings to their reality and how this reality is expressed by their cultural symbols being reflected in their
art and language (Geertz, 197310). According to Geertz, to understand a culture is to rely on Thick Description which
specifies many details, conceptual structures and meanings hidden in the art and language of the people and an
ethnographer’s task is to extract those hidden structures that make up a culture. Steward’s Cultural Ecology (1955)11
states that culture tends to survive and continue in two orders, Cultural Core and Secondary Features. While Cultural
Core of a society forms the basic survival strategies associated with subsistence pattern and economic arrangement,
Secondary Features include social, political and religious organizations which are the results of the extractive
subsistence technology and social behaviours, built on and shaped by the core.
eco-friendly in nature. Communities in Assam do not opt for bamboo cultivation since bamboo grows as natural
groves within the dwelling places and thus people utilize it extensively for crafting Jaapi. In fact bamboo can be torn
into thin polished strips which can be easily woven into a specific frame and this is one of the reasons why bamboo is
prioritized over other items for the production of miniature to large handicraft in Assam. Palm leaves are widely used
for layering the Jaapi as they are best suited for roofing purposes in order to stop penetration of rain and heat through
it. In order to prevent so, a typical layer of palm leaves is framed into the stripped bamboos so that it acts as a roof
over the head like that of thatched huts. Another advantage adds to the logic of selection of palm leaves is that it can
make the roof cooler by hitting the heat with wind blows. One of the reasons supporting this fact comes from the
manually controlled hand-made fans (tokou paator bisoni) where Palm leaves are used widely. This creates a cooling
effect on the headgear. All these factors ultimately got transformed into an artistic craft in the form of Jaapi which is
conveniently utilized by the needy farmers and cowherds.
5. FINDINGS:
Finding of the present study as follows-
Material objects in the form of traditional craft are the important tools for representing socio-cultural and
ecological identity of a community or a region.
These objects of representation connect the human physical and mental constructs over time and space.
A traditional craft is modified into a new form as response to the ongoing societal and technological changes.
6. RECOMMENDATIONS:
The Cultural Symbolism and Cultural Ecology approaches reflected in the present study have policy
implications for community development as well as for sustainable environmental conservation practices.
Conservation of traditional craft will promote to safeguard the cultural heritage of a community or a region
which is a growing concern for social security and identity crisis. The government as well as the educational
institutions should make necessary provisions to arrange heritage visits for the student community so that they
are made aware of the indigenous culture of their society and this could be a way to promote innovative ideas
among the students by learning the creative art and craft at grass-root level. In this way new inventions may
take place. In addition to it, the government should arrange vocational courses on handicrafts which will strive
to generate employment opportunities for rural youths.
Sustainability of environment can also be encouraged taking into account the local ecological knowledge of
the indigenous community. For instance, promoting for palm tree cultivation in the urban planning will not
only help in the sustainable development of the Jaapi artisans but will also help in protecting the local and
regional environment. This initiative will have bipolar role, first as a means for secure procurement of palm
leaves for Jaapi making and second as a way to deal with global warming in the cities by combating heat
through the cooling effect of palm leaves. Himalayan fan palm trees can be selected under afforestation
scheme that might lower the heating effect during summer season. Another initiative that must be encouraged
is inclusion of critically endangered species as Textile motifs along with traditional motifs and designs so that
it can be used as a strong tool for environmental awareness among both literate and illiterate population.
Pictorial representation and textile designs have a greater potential in making impression on the minds of the
illiterates and hence such practice must be prioritized at the present era of pollution.
7. CONCLUSION:
Material objects of consumption such as Pochampally Ikkats and Jaapi handicraft have a crucial role to play
in restoring the socio-cultural identity of a community or a region. Through these non-vocal representations, people
have been preserving their age old tradition, self and identity that might otherwise be difficult to deal through active
vocal protests and movements. Thus, these representations have great symbolic value apart from being treated as
consumer products. A society strives to survive and adjust with the evolutionary stages by making changes over their
utilitarian material objects like Jaapi crafting that are necessary to modify as a means to adapt to the ongoing societal
changes and technology.
8. ACKNOWLEDGMENT:
The author is thankful to his supervisor Dr. George Tharakan C., Department of Anthropology, University of
Hyderabad for his academic support and Dr. V.S. Rao, Centre for Regional Studies, University of Hyderabad for
making necessary arrangement for ethnographic visit to Pochampally weaving centre of Telangana. Above all, the
author is deeply indebted to the key respondents for their valuable data sharing.
REFERENCES:
1. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction. A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge.
2. Woodward, I. (2001). Domestic objects and the taste epiphany. A resource for consumption methodology.
Journal of Material Culture , 6 (2), 115–36.
3. Gibson, J. J. (1986). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
4. Harré, R. (2002). Material objects in social worlds. Theory, Culture and Society, , 19 (5/6), 23–33.
5. Femenias, B., Medlin, M. A., Meisch, L. A., & Zorn, E. (1987). Andean Aesthetics: Textiles of Peru and
BoliviaAndean Aesthetics:. Madison: The Regents of the Wisconsin System.
6. Heckman, A. M. (2003). Woven Stories: Andean Textiles and Rituals. Albuquerque: University of New
Mexico Press.
7. Jung, C. G. (1968). Man and His Symbols. New York: Dell.
8. Peterson, L. (1984). Crafts economies: a quiet renaissance. The IDRC Reports , 13 (1), 5-7.
9. Seidman, J. (1990). In our own image: a cultural studies textbookfor southern Africa. Gaborone: Foundation
for Education with Production, Gaborone.
10. Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
11. Steward, J. H. (1955). Theory of cultural change: the methodology of multilinear evolution. Urbana:
University of Illinois Press.
12. Srikanth, Y. (2002). Traditional occupation and contemporary problems: A Case Study of Padmashali
Community in Karimnagar District, A.P. (M.Phil. Dissertation). Hyderabad: Department of Anthropology,
University of Hyderabad.
13. Nath, B. (2019). Assamese Traditional Icon 'Japi': History And Diversity. RESEARCH REVIEW International
Journal of Multidisciplinary , 4 (8).