Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 76 views

    Literary Analysis Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Teresa Teixeira
    The scoring guide evaluates literary analyses based on three criteria: organization/progression, development of ideas, and use of language and conventions. A high-quality analysis (scoring a 4) is very well organized, offers insightful interpretations supported by examples, and uses precise language with correct grammar. A satisfactory analysis (scoring a 3) is generally effective but could be more engaging, while interpretations may lack full support. A developing analysis (scoring a 2) has unclear organization and interpretations with some language issues. A beginning analysis (scoring a 1) lacks organization and interpretations while having major language errors.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Literary Analysis Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Teresa Teixeira
    76 views1 page
    The scoring guide evaluates literary analyses based on three criteria: organization/progression, development of ideas, and use of language and conventions. A high-quality analysis (scoring a 4) is very well organized, offers insightful interpretations supported by examples, and uses precise language with correct grammar. A satisfactory analysis (scoring a 3) is generally effective but could be more engaging, while interpretations may lack full support. A developing analysis (scoring a 2) has unclear organization and interpretations with some language issues. A beginning analysis (scoring a 1) lacks organization and interpretations while having major language errors.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The scoring guide evaluates literary analyses based on three criteria: organization/progression, development of ideas, and use of language and conventions. A high-quality analysis (scoring a 4) is very well organized, offers insightful interpretations supported by examples, and uses precise language with correct grammar. A satisfactory analysis (scoring a 3) is generally effective but could be more engaging, while interpretations may lack full support. A developing analysis (scoring a 2) has unclear organization and interpretations with some language issues. A beginning analysis (scoring a 1) lacks organization and interpretations while having major language errors.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    76 views1 page

    Literary Analysis Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Teresa Teixeira
    The scoring guide evaluates literary analyses based on three criteria: organization/progression, development of ideas, and use of language and conventions. A high-quality analysis (scoring a 4) is very well organized, offers insightful interpretations supported by examples, and uses precise language with correct grammar. A satisfactory analysis (scoring a 3) is generally effective but could be more engaging, while interpretations may lack full support. A developing analysis (scoring a 2) has unclear organization and interpretations with some language issues. A beginning analysis (scoring a 1) lacks organization and interpretations while having major language errors.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    WRITING TASK

    Use the scoring guide to evaluate your literary analysis.

    Writing Task Scoring Guide: Literary Analysis

    Organization/Progression Development of Ideas Use of Language and


    Conventions

    • The organization is very effective • The introduction grabs the • Language and word choice is
    and appropriate to the purpose. reader’s attention and states a purposeful and precise.
    • The controlling idea is stated very compelling controlling idea. • Sources are correctly cited.
    clearly. • The analysis offers insightful • Sentences include a variety of
    • Body paragraphs clearly relate interpretations of the chosen text. phrases and clauses.
    4 to the controlling idea, and ideas • The analysis contains clear main • Grammar, spelling, capitalization,
    within each body paragraph follow ideas supported by well-chosen punctuation, and usage are
    a logical order. examples and quotations. correct.
    • There are very clear transitions • The conclusion effectively
    between paragraphs. summarizes the analysis.

    • The organization is effective and • The introduction could be • Language and word choice is
    appropriate to the purpose. more engaging, but it states a somewhat purposeful and precise.
    • The controlling idea is stated controlling idea. • Sources are mentioned but may
    clearly. • The analysis offers reasonable not be correctly cited.
    • Body paragraphs relate to the interpretations of the text. • Sentences include a variety of
    3 controlling idea, and ideas within
    each body paragraph are mostly
    • The analysis is developed with
    clear main ideas supported by
    phrases and clauses, and most are
    punctuated correctly.
    easy to follow. mostly relevant examples and • Grammar, spelling, capitalization,
    • There are clear transitions quotations. punctuation, and usage are mostly
    between paragraphs. • The conclusion summarizes the correct.
    analysis.

    • The organization is somewhat • The introduction is not engaging; • Language is often vague and
    confusing or lacking in purpose. the controlling idea is unclear or general.
    • The controlling idea is not stated missing. • Sources are not correctly cited.
    very clearly. • The interpretations of the text are • Some phrases or clauses are
    • It is unclear how ideas within body unclear or questionable. punctuated incorrectly.
    2 paragraphs are related.
    • More transitions are needed
    • The analysis is minimally
    developed. Main ideas are unclear
    • There are errors in grammar,
    spelling, capitalization,
    to show connections between or lack appropriate examples and punctuation, and usage, but they
    paragraphs. quotations to support them. do not make reading difficult.
    • The conclusion only partially
    summarizes the analysis.
    © Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company

    • The organization is not • The introduction is missing or • Language is inappropriate, vague,


    appropriate to the purpose. confusing. or confusing.
    • The controlling idea is missing. • The analysis offers no clear • No sources are mentioned.
    • The order of paragraphs or ideas interpretations of the text. • Phrases and clauses are
    1 within paragraphs is confusing. • The analysis is poorly developed. punctuated incorrectly.
    • There are no transitions between Examples and quotations are • There are many errors in grammar,
    paragraphs. irrelevant or missing. usage, and mechanics that make
    • The conclusion is missing. the analysis difficult to follow.

    148 Unit 2

    You might also like