ATSIII HandOut
ATSIII HandOut
ATSIII HandOut
INRODUCTION
There are a variety of science teaching methods you can draw upon when helping students
understand their world. While there are several approaches to try, the most important thing to
keep in mind is that our role as science educators is to help students understand how the
scientific method actually works and why science impacts upon their own lives.
Group dynamics.
Who works well with who? Who can handle cooperative group situations and who needs time
to work by themselves?
Student ability.
This is not simply about science understanding, this also about their ability to undertake the
work with the materials at hand.
Timeframe.
Is the teaching method likely to be successful given how long it takes to get students on task
and the anticipated outcomes?
Context.
How does the scientific concept relate to their lives?
Content.
Which teaching method will help the students best understand the lesson material?
THREE STAGES OF
Direct instruction has a number of critics, who believe that it has little room for personalization
adaptability. The six steps in direct instruction are:
1. Introducing material, that is used to activate students' prior knowledge.
2. Presenting new material, where students begin to learn with step-by-step guides.
3. Guiding students, where teachers can correct mistakes early on and reteach material if needed.
5. Practicing independently, where students individually apply the skills that they've gained.
1. Direct Instruction Mirrors Home Life - Direct instruction is important because it mirrors the
environment that many of our students will return to when they leave School. They will be in a
class full of other students, they will have to listen to lectures, they will need to be able work in
groups, they will have deadlines, they will have a work load, and they will not always be able to
work at their own pace. By using direct instruction, we are able to teach our students coping
skills in dealing with a school environment; we are able to prepare them for what they will
encounter they leave school. Once
2. Direct Instruction Provides More Detailed & Varied Instruction - By using direct instruction
instead of independent study, I am able to provide more detailed and varied instruction.
Instead of waiting for my students to turn in their work, I am able to assess how well they
grasp a concept while I am teaching it. This then enables me to modify the lesson as needed.
As a result, I am able to accommodate more learning styles and better help students with
learning disabilities. It also lets me monitor their progress and adjust y instruction o ill in the
gaps they might have in their learning. Using direct instruction also allows students to ask
more questions and have me reteach the concepts that they are having difficulty with. I am
able to be far more flexible than if I had my students do independent study
3. Direct Instruction Allows for More Interaction - Students are able to ask more questions
and request assistance. They are also able to discuss their interests enabling me to add those
to my lessons. At School, we emphasize the building of appropriate relationships. Direct
instruction helps facilitate this by encouraging more communication in the classroom.
Students have a better opportunity to discuss th eir ideas and feelings in a group. They are
able to get to know one another as well as their teachers. Moving to direct instruction has been
very successful. We have been able to better prepare our students for their academic future
while addressing their individual needs. This change has allowed us to give our students the
means to be more successful in the future.
According to the National Institute for Direct Instruction, Direct Instruction operates on five key
philosophical principles:
All teachers can succeed if provided with adequate training and materials.
Low performers and disadvantaged learners must be taught at a faster rate than
typically occurs if they are to catch up to their higher performance peers.
A teaching method that assumes all students can be taught, all students can improve both
academically and in terms of self-image, and that teachers succeed when they are supported
with adequate training and materials is one that most people could get behind.
Is a way of teaching which is aimed at helping students acquire some basic skills and
"procedural knowledge”? It is straightforward and is done in a "step-by-step manner. The
expository learning method is a way of teaching in which the teacher or the instructor is the
one who provides information to the students up front, without much interaction from
student’s side, except for something answering question.
It is an approach to teaching and training that encourages the learner to explore and
experiment to uncover relationships, with much less of focus on didactic training (teaching
students by lecturing them).
Expository teaching methods are useful to introduce a new topic and to demonstrate methods
to solve mathematical problems. It is a form of whole group instruction that in elementary
school should be combined with small group instruction.
A teacher should consider expository teaching to be working if the students are engaged
enough to ask relevant questions. The disadvantage of expository teaching is that students
often become bored and inattentive. An effective teacher will intersperse photos, videos and
class activities with expository teaching to enhance its effectiveness.
The teacher is completely in charge and guides the lesson. He/she is also in charge of the
discussion and asks questions by calling on students for answers
2. Demonstration
4. Memorizing
5. Reviewing
6. Questioning discussion
2. It is more disciplined form of teaching and the idea behind expository method of teaching is
lesser distractions as teacher takes up the charge in the class and guides the lesson. They
tend to use language and examples that are relatable for the students of that age group. age of
as
3. As the teacher is thought of as an expert in this form of teaching so there are less chances
of students misinterpreting the information. They know how to take the learners from concrete
to the abstract level. If a learner has good listening skills, he can gasp more information in a
lesser time.
This method was propounded by W.H Kilpatrick. This method was perfected by J.A Sternson.
The base of this method lies in the philosophy of pragmatism. This method emphasizes on
building a comprehensive unit around an activity which may be carried out in school or outside.
The essence of this method lies in the fact that a group of students do a purposeful task. This
implies the students undertake the activity in a group or individually over a period of time. It
may include a number of activities and the end product is in the form of written report or a
display.
“A project is a bit of real life that has been imported into school. – Ballard.
Thus, project is a purposeful activity and planned activity which is achieved in social, natural
situations created in schools.
Often part of inquiry-based instruction, the outputs of Project Based Learning (PBL) can
include several of the following as a major work;
Field journal
Student Podcast
Working model
Science poster
Research paper
Video diaries
Augmented reality or Virtual reality
App creation
Advantages:
It gives the students a hands on experience.
Enhances manipulative skills of the students
Shows their creativeness and imagination
Disadvantages:
It can be very time-consuming.
It will isolate the student to a long period of time doing one activity only one
May only enhance the same and repeated skills in the side of the student.
DEDUCTIVE APPROACH
A deductive approach to teaching language starts by giving learners rules, then examples, then
practice. It is a teacher-centers approach to presenting new content. This is compared with an
inductive approach, which starts with examples and asks learners to find rules, and hence is
more learner-centered.
Example:
The form and use of the third conditional is explained to learners, then they have a gap-fill
exercise to complete, then prepare their own examples in the classroom.
The deductive approach may be suitable with lower level learners who need a clear base from
which to begin with a new language item, or with learners who are accustomed to a more
traditional approach and so who lack the training to find rules themselves.
INDUCTIVE APPROACH
Inductive learning is the process of 'discovering' general principles from facts. In a language
classroom, an inductive approach involves getting learners to discover rules and how they are
applied by looking at examples. The role of the teacher is to provide language the learners
needs to discover the rules, to guide them in discovery if necessary, and then to provide more
opportunities to practice.
The inductive approach is often taught of as a more modern way of teaching: it involves
discovery techniques; it seeks in some ways to duplicate the acquisition process; it often
exploits authentic material; it has learners at the center of the lesson; and the focus is on
usage rather than rules.
Remember that both inductive and deductive approaches are at risk for research biases,
particularly confirmation bias and cognitive bias.
CONCLUSION:
There is no "best" method of teaching. However, many researchers today agree that
including more student-centered learning approaches in the classroom can improve
learning, using only a teacher-centered approach leaves out many skills and learning
opportunities for students. And the best method to use is the one that suits the need of
the learners based on multiple factors.