Transpo RRL

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

CHAPTER 2

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

Public transportation organizations face unrelenting pressure to deliver cost-effective


services, with fuel costs constituting a significant portion of their annual budgets, typically
ranging from 10% to 25% (Brown et al., 2020). These organizations are proactively seeking
ways to reduce fuel consumption and emissions in the face of fluctuating fuel prices and
mounting environmental concerns.

In response to these challenges, research has explored innovative transit solutions.


Lajunen's 2013 study provides a comprehensive analysis of electric city buses, conducting
a cost-benefit evaluation grounded in an energy consumption model that considers driving
patterns, vehicle characteristics, and energy storage systems. This research illuminates the
cost-effectiveness of powertrain technology, ultimately revealing electric city buses' higher
energy efficiency and lower lifecycle costs.

Similarly, the 2021 study by Yusof et al. underscores the environmental benefits of
electric vehicles (EVs) for public transportation, emphasizing reduced pollution, enhanced
environmental sustainability, and improved air quality in urban areas.

In alignment with these findings, Jeffers and Eudy's 2021 study evaluates the
performance of Proterra battery electric buses in Southern California, showcasing their
environmental advantages, including reduced emissions and noise pollution, thus
contributing to a more sustainable and efficient public transportation system.

The 2014 article "Study on the economic and environmental benefits of different EV
bus electrification scenarios: A case study in Davis, CA" by Wang et al. further highlights
the cost-effectiveness and environmental benefits of electric buses, especially when
combined with renewable energy sources. It explores diverse charging infrastructure
options, demonstrating that electric buses can significantly reduce greenhouse gas
emissions and air pollution.
Moreover, Liu et al.'s 2019 study evaluates the impact of passenger loading on the
energy consumption of transit buses, revealing the advantages of electric buses in
recapturing energy and offering valuable insights for transit agencies.

Lajunen and Lipman's 2016 study complements this narrative by emphasizing the
energy efficiency and emission reduction benefits of hybrid and electric city buses. Recent
advancements in engine technology are noted, underscoring the potential for economic and
environmental advantages through the adoption of these new technologies.

Additionally, Wang et al.'s 2015 study analyzes the energy consumption of EVs in
real-world driving conditions, highlighting the importance of driving patterns and traffic
conditions in determining energy consumption.

Liu et al.'s 2019 study delves into the energy consumption of hybrid electric buses
(HEBs) under various driving conditions, stressing the importance of optimizing power
management for enhanced energy efficiency.

Salmasi's 2007 analysis of control systems for hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs)
discusses the significance of energy management systems in hybrid drivetrains,
categorizing different HEV management strategies, and evaluating their benefits and
drawbacks.

Furthermore, the report by Eudy and Post in 2021 offers an annual status report on
the progress of fuel cell electric bus (FCEB) development in the United States, summarizing
achievements and challenges and providing valuable insights for transit agencies and
policymakers considering the adoption of fuel cell electric buses.
Citations:

Liu, L., Kotz, A., Salapaka, A., Miller, E., & Northrop, W. F. (2019, June 3). Impact of
Time-Varying Passenger Loading on Conventional and Electrified Transit Bus
Energy Consumption. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the
Transportation Research Board, 2673(10), 632–640.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119852337

Yusof, N. K., Abas, P. E., Mahlia, T. M. I., & Hannan, M. A. (2021). Techno-
Economic Analysis and Environmental Impact of Electric Buses. World
Electric Vehicle Journal, 12(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj12010031

Chen, Y., Zhang, Y., & Sun, R. (2021). Data-driven estimation of energy
consumption for electric bus under real-world driving conditions.
Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 98, 102969.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102969

Jeffers, Matthew and Leslie Eudy. 2021. Foothill Transit Battery Electric Bus
Evaluation: Final Report. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
NREL/TP-540080022. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy21osti/80022.pdf.

Lajunen, A., & Lipman, T. (2016). Lifecycle cost assessment and carbon dioxide
emissions of diesel, natural gas, hybrid electric, fuel cell hybrid and electric
transit buses. Energy, 106, 329-342.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.075

Lajunen, A. (2013). Energy consumption and cost-benefit analysis of hybrid and


electric city buses. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies,
38, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2013.10.008

Wang, B., Xu, M., & Yang, L. (2014). Study on the economic and environmental
benefits of different EV powertrain topologies. Energy Conversion and
Management, 86, 916-926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.05.077
Eudy, L., & Post, M. (2021, March 1). Fuel Cell Buses in U.S. Transit Fleets: Current
Status 2020. https://doi.org/10.2172/1772437

Wang, H., Zhang, X., & Ouyang, M. (2015). Energy consumption of electric vehicles
based on real-world driving patterns: A case study of Beijing. Applied Energy,
157, 710-719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.05.057

Salmasi, Farzad Rajaei. “Control Strategies for Hybrid Electric Vehicles: Evolution,
Classification, Comparison, and Future Trends.” IEEE Transactions on
Vehicular Technology, vol. 56, no. 5, Sept. 2007, pp. 2393–2404,
https://doi.org/10.1109/tvt.2007.899933.

You might also like