Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    Abdul Rehman - 200196 - CS - Lab5

    Uploaded by

    Abdul Rehman
    The document describes an electrical engineering lab experiment on investigating the effect of poles and zeros on the time response of first- and second-order systems. The objectives are to assess how the placement of poles and zeros influences time response. The lab involves setting up various transfer functions in Simulink and analyzing the step response for different pole and zero configurations. Key results include: (1) systems with poles closer to the origin have higher rise and settling times; (2) increasing the real part of poles reduces rise time and overshoot while decreasing settling time; (3) increasing the imaginary part of poles reduces rise time but can increase or decrease settling time depending on the magnitude of change.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Abdul Rehman - 200196 - CS - Lab5

    Uploaded by

    Abdul Rehman
    7 views9 pages
    The document describes an electrical engineering lab experiment on investigating the effect of poles and zeros on the time response of first- and second-order systems. The objectives are to assess how the placement of poles and zeros influences time response. The lab involves setting up various transfer functions in Simulink and analyzing the step response for different pole and zero configurations. Key results include: (1) systems with poles closer to the origin have higher rise and settling times; (2) increasing the real part of poles reduces rise time and overshoot while decreasing settling time; (3) increasing the imaginary part of poles reduces rise time but can increase or decrease settling time depending on the magnitude of change.

    Original Description:

    Control Repoort

    Original Title

    Abdul Rehman_200196_CS_Lab5

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document describes an electrical engineering lab experiment on investigating the effect of poles and zeros on the time response of first- and second-order systems. The objectives are to assess how the placement of poles and zeros influences time response. The lab involves setting up various transfer functions in Simulink and analyzing the step response for different pole and zero configurations. Key results include: (1) systems with poles closer to the origin have higher rise and settling times; (2) increasing the real part of poles reduces rise time and overshoot while decreasing settling time; (3) increasing the imaginary part of poles reduces rise time but can increase or decrease settling time depending on the magnitude of change.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    7 views9 pages

    Abdul Rehman - 200196 - CS - Lab5

    Uploaded by

    Abdul Rehman
    The document describes an electrical engineering lab experiment on investigating the effect of poles and zeros on the time response of first- and second-order systems. The objectives are to assess how the placement of poles and zeros influences time response. The lab involves setting up various transfer functions in Simulink and analyzing the step response for different pole and zero configurations. Key results include: (1) systems with poles closer to the origin have higher rise and settling times; (2) increasing the real part of poles reduces rise time and overshoot while decreasing settling time; (3) increasing the imaginary part of poles reduces rise time but can increase or decrease settling time depending on the magnitude of change.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 9

    AIR UNIVERSITY

    DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER


    ENGINEERING
    EXPERIMENT NO 05

    Lab Title: Effect of poles and zeros on �me response


    Student Name: Abdul Rehman Reg. No: 200196
    Objec�ve: To assess how the placement of poles and zeros influences the �me response of first- and
    second-order systems.

    LAB ASSESSMENT:
    Excellent Good Average Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
    Attributes
    (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
    Ability to Conduct
    Experiment
    Ability to assimilate the
    results
    Effective use of lab
    equipment and follows the
    lab safety rules

    Total Marks: Obtained Marks:

    LAB REPORT ASSESSMENT:


    Excellent Good Average Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
    Attributes
    (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)

    Data presentation

    Experimental results

    Conclusion

    Total Marks: Obtained Marks:

    Date: Signature:
    Task#1:
    1. Set up the Given transfer func�on:

    For a: 1, 2, 3, 4 and plot the step response of each of the four transfer func�ons on a single
    graph by using the Simulink LTI Viewer. Also, record the values of setling �me and rise �me for
    each step response.
    Code:
    clc
    clear all
    close all
    num=[1];
    den=[-1];
    den=poly(den);
    a=tf(num,den)
    num=[2];
    den=[-2];
    den=poly(den);
    b=tf(num,den)
    num=[3];
    den=[-3];
    den=poly(den);
    c=tf(num,den)
    num=[4];
    den=[-4];
    den=poly(den);
    d=tf(num,den)
    ltiview(a,b,c,d)

    Output:

    TF Functions:
    a Rise Time Settling Time
    1 2.2 3.91
    2 1.1 1.96
    3 0.732 1.3
    4 0.549 0.978

    Chart Title
    4.5
    4
    3.5
    3
    Time(s)

    2.5
    2
    1.5
    1
    0.5
    0
    1 2 3 4
    Pole(a)

    Rise Time Settling Time

    As you can see if poles are close to the origin, then rise �me and setling �me is high as
    compare to the poles away from origin.
    2. Using Simulink, set up the system below.

     For a=4, b=25.

     For a and b so that the imaginary part of the poles remains the same, but the real part is
    increased two �mes.

     For a and b so that the imaginary part of the poles remains the same, but the real part is
    decreased 1/2 �mes.
    Using the Simulink LTI Viewer, plot the step response of each of the three transfer func�ons on a
    single graph. Also, record the values of percent overshot, setling �me, peak �me, and rise �me for
    each step response.

    Code:
    clc
    clear all
    close all
    b=25;
    a=4;
    num=[25];
    den=[1 4 25];
    tf_A=tf(num,den)
    A=roots(den);
    B=poly([-4.0000+4.5826i -4.0000-4.5826i]);
    num=[37.0002];
    den=[1.0000 8.0000 37.0002];
    tf_B=tf(num,den)
    B=poly([-1.0000+4.5826i -1.0000-4.5826i]);
    num=[22.0002];
    den=[1.0000 8.0000 22.0002];
    tf_C=tf(num,den)
    ltiview(tf_A,tf_B,tf_C);
    Output:

    TF Functions:

    Real Part Rise Time(s) Setling Time(s) Overshoot (%)


    2 0.293 1.68 25.4
    4 0.329 0.988 6.44
    1 0.571 1.3 0.591

    As we can see when we double the real part the rise �me increase, setling �me decreases and
    overshoot is also controlled. Also, if we half the real part then rise �me increases and setling �me
    also decreases and overshoot is almost around 1%.
    3. Using Simulink, set up the systems with:

     a=4, b=25.

     a and b so that the real part of the poles remains the same but the imaginary part is increased
    two �mes.

     a and b so that the real part of the poles remains the same but the imaginary part is increased
    four �mes

    Using the Simulink LTI Viewer, plot the step response of each of the three transfer func�ons on a
    single graph. Also, record the values of percent overshoot, setling �me, peak �me, and rise �me for
    each step response.

    Code:
    clc
    clear all
    close all
    b=25;
    a=4;
    num=[25];
    den=[1 4 25];
    tf_A=tf(num,den)
    A=roots(den);
    B=poly([-2.0000+2*4.5826i -2.0000-2*4.5826i]);
    num=[88.0009];
    den=[1.0000 8.0000 88.0009];
    tf_B=tf(num,den)
    B=poly([-2.0000+4*4.5826i -2.0000-4*4.5826i]);
    num=[340.0036];
    den=[1.0000 8.0000 340.0036];
    tf_C=tf(num,den)
    ltiview(tf_A,tf_B,tf_C);
    Output:

    TF Functions:

    Imaginary Part Rise Time(s) Settling Time(s) Overshoot (%)


    -4.5826 0.293 1.68 25.4
    -9.1652 1.61 0.895 22.7
    -18.3304 0.0666 0.922 49.7

    We can see if imaginary part is doubled rise time reduces, settling time is
    also and overshoot so. But if we multiply it with 4 rise time is almost 0.1,
    settling time is increased and overshoot too.
    4. Using Simulink, set up the systems with:

     a=4, b=25

     a and b so that the damping ra�o remains the same but the natural frequency is increased two
    �mes.

     a and b so that the damping ra�o remains the same but the natural frequency is increased four
    �mes

    Using the Simulink LTI Viewer, plot the step response of each of the three transfer func�ons on a
    single graph. Also, record the values of percent overshoot, setling �me, peak �me, and rise �me for
    each step response.

    Code:
    clc
    clear all
    close all
    num=[25];
    den=[1 4 25];
    tf_A=tf(num,den)
    num=[100];
    den=[1 8 100];
    tf_B=tf(num,den)
    num=[400];
    den=[1 16 400];
    tf_C=tf(num,den)
    ltiview(tf_A,tf_B,tf_C);
    Output:

    TF Functions:

    Natural Rise Time(s) Settling Time(s) Overshoot (%)


    Frequency (NF)
    NF 0.293 1.68 25.4
    2*NF 1.47 0.841 25.4
    4*NF 0.0733 0.42 25.4

    So, if we doubled the natural frequency rise time increases,


    settling time decreases but overshoot remain the same. If we
    quadruple the natural frequency rise time decreases, settling
    time decreases but overshoot remain the same.

    You might also like