MCOI - IMS - Company Manual
MCOI - IMS - Company Manual
MCOI - IMS - Company Manual
SOP-3-090-2017-S
㻌
㻌
㻌
㻌
㻌
㻌
MCO-I
INTEGRATED
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
MANUAL 㻌
㻌
㻌
㻌
㻌
㻌
㻌
㻌
㻌
Established: November 13, 2017
㻌
Uncontrolled if Printed
Contents
0. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 1
1. Purpose and Scope of the Integrated Management System ............................................................................ 2
2. MCO-I Corporate Beliefs ................................................................................................................................... 2
2.1 Vision ........................................................................................................................................................... 3
2.2 Values.......................................................................................................................................................... 3
2.3 Our Mission ................................................................................................................................................. 3
2.4 MCO-I IMS Policy ........................................................................................................................................ 3
2.5 Business Objectives .................................................................................................................................... 4
2.6 Tenets and Guiding Principles .................................................................................................................... 4
3. References and Definitions ............................................................................................................................... 5
3.1 References .................................................................................................................................................. 5
3.2 Terms and definitions .................................................................................................................................. 5
4. Context of MCO-I ............................................................................................................................................ 10
4.1 MCO-I and its context ............................................................................................................................... 11
4.2 Needs and expectations of interested parties ........................................................................................... 12
4.3 Scope of the integrated management system .......................................................................................... 13
4.4 Integrated management system and its processes .................................................................................... 13
5. Leadership ....................................................................................................................................................... 14
5.1 Leadership and commitment ..................................................................................................................... 14
5.2 MCO-I policy .............................................................................................................................................. 14
5.3 Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities ................................................................................ 14
5.4 Consultation and participation of workers ................................................................................................. 15
6. Planning........................................................................................................................................................... 16
6.1 Actions to address risks and opportunities ............................................................................................... 16
6.2 IMS objectives and planning to achieve .................................................................................................... 17
6.3 Planning for change .................................................................................................................................. 17
7. Support ............................................................................................................................................................ 18
7.1 Resources ................................................................................................................................................. 18
7.2 Competence .............................................................................................................................................. 18
7.4 Communication ......................................................................................................................................... 20
7.5 Documented information ........................................................................................................................... 23
8. Operation ......................................................................................................................................................... 25
8.1 Operational planning and control .............................................................................................................. 25
8.2 Requirements for products and services .................................................................................................. 26
8.3 Design and development of products and services .................................................................................. 26
8.4 Control of externally provided processes, products and services ............................................................ 28
8.5 Production and service provision .............................................................................................................. 29
8.6 Release of products and services ............................................................................................................. 30
8.7 Control of nonconforming outputs ............................................................................................................. 31
9. Performance evaluation .................................................................................................................................. 32
9.1 Monitoring, measurement, analysis, and evaluation ................................................................................. 32
9.2 Internal audit (SOP-3-091-2023-S) ........................................................................................................... 33
9.3 Management review .................................................................................................................................. 34
10. Improvement ................................................................................................................................................. 35
10.1 General .................................................................................................................................................... 35
10.2 Nonconformity and corrective action Corrective Action (SOP-3-091-2025-S) ....................................... 35
10.3 Continual improvement ........................................................................................................................... 36
0. Introduction
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Compressor International (MCO-I) developed and implemented an
integrated Quality, Information Security, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety
Management System in order to document the company’s best business practices, better satisfy
the requirements and expectations of its customers, enhance its environmental performance,
ensure secure information and systems management, support and promote good health and safety
practices and improve the overall management of the company.
To understand our organization and context, MCO-I determined external and internal issues relevant
to and affecting its ability to achieve intended results of this Integrated Management System (IMS).
MCO-I meets the requirements of the international standard ISO 9001:2015. The system addresses
the design, development, production, installation, and servicing of customer products. It incorporates
the process approach where consistent and predictable results are achieved more effectively and
efficiently when activities are understood and managed as interrelated processes.
MCO-I meets the requirements of international standard ISO 14001:2015. The system addresses
the management of environmental aspects, compliance obligations, the actions to address risks and
opportunities. The management of the interactive processes provides for the achievement of
continual improvement and focus on efforts leading to the prevention of undesirable outcomes.
MCO-I meets the requirements of the international standard of ISO 45001:2018. The system
addresses the MCO-I policy commitments to comply with applicable legal requirements, to the
prevention of injury and ill health and to continual improvement.
MCO-I meets the requirements of the international standard ISO 27001:2013. The system
addresses the Information Security commitments to provide secure business systems the preserve
the confidentiality, integrity and availability of information by applying a risk management process
therefore giving confidence to interested parties that the risks are adequately managed.
Process based thinking is applied in this IMS and its processes utilizing a “Plan-Do-Check-Act”
methodology and focus on “Risk-Based Thinking” driving to the prevention of undesirable outcomes.
The manual describes the IMS, delineates authorities, interrelationships and responsibilities of the
personnel responsible within the system. The manual also provides the documented information
with procedures or references for all activities comprising the management system that ensures the
compliance to the requirements of the standards.
This manual is used internally to guide the company’s employees through the various requirements
of the quality, information security, environmental, and health and safety standards that must be
met and maintained in order to ensure good health and safety, environmental performance,
customer satisfaction, secure data and systems, continual improvement and provide the necessary
instructions that create an empowered work force.
SOP-3-090-2017-S (Rev. 4) 2/47
This manual explains how MCO-I’s activities are conducted and outlines documentation and
procedures that fulfil the requirements of Quality Management System (ISO 9001:2015),
Environmental Management System (ISO 14001:2015), Occupational Health and Safety
Management Systems (ISO 45001:2018) and Information Security (ISO 27001: 2013).
Department managers located at MCO-I have the responsibility to align their department with this
business-wide Integrated Management System (IMS) manual, the MCO-I Policy and MCO-I
Business Objectives. This IMS manual covers general information on Quality, Environmental,
Information Security, Health and Safety standard operating procedures and applies to all MCO-I
employees as assigned. (Ref A.Table 4-2)
MCO-I’s scope is design services, production, packaging, part storage, repair and on-site advisory
support for turbomachinery parts and equipment products. The scope of the MCO-I Integrated
Management System (MCO-I IMS) includes all processes that produce or obtain products, perform
repairs and overhauls, or provide service support to its customers as well as those that support
compliance of our systems and personnel in a safe, environmentally responsible way where
information technology systems and intellectual property are safe-guarded. MCO-I’s scope of
responsibility ends when the customer or contractor takes responsibility for performing on site work,
with MCO-I Technical Field Advisors (TFA’s) then providing only technical field guidance. TFA’s
comply with all on site protocols per applicable standards or customer requirements.
<=== QHSE & IT Integrated throughout the MCO-I Business Process ===>
Risk Management SOP Systems Continuous Improvement Customer Focus Stop Work Authority Managem ent Review
2.1 Vision
x MCO-I strives to be the premiere choice for turbomachinery products and services in North
America
2.2 Values
x Integrity
x Social Responsibility
x Harmony
2.3 Our Mission
x Deliver best-in-class customer experience
x Adopt global solutions through local presence
x Honor our values of integrity, social responsibility and harmony
MCO-I employees have an instilled culture of compliance, cooperation and continual improvement
communicated through our Vision, Values, Mission, Policy Statement, Objectives, Team Principles
and Tenets. Top management ensures adequate resource and leadership is in place to support
health, safety, environmental, quality and information technology security initiatives as well as
ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. Top management is committed to providing safe
and healthy working conditions for the prevention of illness, reduction of risks and elimination of
known hazards. Top management is committed to consulting with and involving all workers in
development of the IMS. Furthermore, top management is committed to sound environmental
stewardship through pollution prevention, waste minimization, and conservation of natural
resources. Top management also ensures MCO-I employees and anyone working under MCO-I
direction are aware of our business compliance requirements.
x Safety – Establish safety programs fostering employee ownership and involvement. Drive
standardized safety equipment and practices and a robust, risk-based CAPA tracking
program.
x Quality – Deliver high-value, on-time and compliant products; engage customers and
develop measures for improvement opportunities; track and drive defects and opportunities
through a robust, risk-based CAPA tracking program.
x Environmental – Maintain all local, federal and corporate compliance and reporting
requirements through employee awareness, preventive measures, risk-based management
and oversight.
x Information Technology – Standardize, drive uptime and usage, data security, and
risk-based continual improvement in support of Information Technology systems.
SOP-3-090-2017-S (Rev. 4) 4/47
3.1 References
For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of
the referenced document including any amendment(s) applies.
x ISO 45001:2018, Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems, First Edition
(2/2)
No. Terms Definitions
9 Sales department Marketing
Communications
Project Coordination
New Units Division
Customer Service Division
x Parts & Service
x Technical Service and Asset Management
x Training
10 Manufacturing / Production / Storage and Spare Parts manufacturing
Warehouse department In House Repairs
New Unit Assembly
Machining of Compressor and Steam Turbine components
Welding
Cleaning, Blasting and Painting
Rotor balancing
Planning and Production Control
Facilities
Logistics
11 QHSE & Systems Support for:
x Quality
x Health & Safety
x Environmental
x Information Security
12 Relevant Mitsubishi Company MHI (Mitsubishi Heavy Industries)
Relationships MHI-A O&G (Americas - wholly owned subsidiary of MHI)
MCO (Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Compressor
Corporation) is a wholly owned subsidiary of MHI
MC-A (Mitsubishi Corporation – Americas)
MCO-I (70% owned by MCO / 30% by MC-A)
13 Interested party Person or organization that can affect, be affected by, or
perceive itself to be affected by a decision or activity
14 MCO-I top management The president who directs and controls MCO-I at the
highest level of the Company
Operating Methods
Evaluation Indicators
(Methodologies/procedures/
(Target values/measurement)
technique)
7 TFA (Technical Field Advisors) Highly skilled MCO-I field service personnel who advise
customer on-site functions including overhauls, new
equipment installations, or other contracted services.
TFA has authority to make recommendations but not take
any physical action.
SOP-3-090-2017-S (Rev. 4) 9/47
4. Context of MCO-I
About MCO-I
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Compressor International Corporation (MCO-I) was established in the
United States in October 2012 as a group company of Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. (MHI).
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Compressor Corporation (MCO), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MHI in
Hiroshima, Japan, holds a 70% stake with Mitsubishi Corporation (Americas) as a 30% joint
venture partner. MCO-I is one of the world’s largest manufacturers of process compressors and
mechanical drive steam turbines. We are dedicated to providing advanced technology machinery
and after-sales service to a variety of industries in the Americas.
The MCO-I facility, Pearland Works, integrates the systems built by MCO into packages, then sells
and provides aftermarket parts and services to the end users. The facility houses state-of-the art
rotor storage and asset management for planned and emergency applications. Engineering
services as well as on-site repair and rebuild services are also part of MCO-I customer offerings.
Industry Applications
MCO-I products and services are used in a broad range of fields, ranging from energy and
transportation to petrochemical fields, which support the infrastructure of society. Compressors and
Turbines products play a variety of roles, from drilling at oil and natural gas wellheads to the final
production and transport processes which bring benefit to our everyday lives. In order to meet the
needs for the fluid compression and expansion that is required by these processes, MCO offers
turbomachinery products and services delivering high performance, high reliability, and good cost
performance.
SOP-3-090-2017-S (Rev. 4) 11/47
Cascaded objectives are then passed to the operations for planning, execution and deployment.
Standing Operational Reviews are conducted for review of business performance. Standing
Management Reviews are held for review of the IMS and its effectiveness. Risk is assessed at
numerous levels of the business with targeted actions taken to ensure a culture of compliance and
continual improvement.
x MCO-I recognizes we have a unique set of interested parties whose needs change and
develop over time. To ensure that our products and processes meet all relevant
requirements, we identify and assess the potential impact of any relevant needs and
expectations that may be elicited from interested parties.
x Reference Annual Communication Plan for interested parties and compliance guide.
SOP-3-090-2017-S (Rev. 4) 13/47
This manual is available to all interested parties that request this or any sub part. The scope of the
IMS shall be as specified in Section 1 in consideration of the following items:
x External and internal issues referred to in Section 4.1
x Compliance obligations referred to in Section 4.2
x Business functions and physical boundaries of MCO-I
x Activities, products, and services of MCO-I
x MCO-I’s limit of authority and ability to exercise control and influence as shown in sourcing
and the MCO-I Business Integration Scope.
MCO-I establishes, maintains, and implements this IMS documentation system based on the
requirements of ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 45001 and ISO 27001.
To achieve the intended outcomes including enhancement of its health, safety, quality,
environmental and information security performance, the Company, in accordance with the
requirements of this Manual, makes sure to:
(1) establish, implement, maintain, and continually improve the IMS including the necessary
processes and their interactions:
(2) consider knowledge gained in Sections 4.1 and 4.2 when establishing and maintaining IMS,
5. Leadership
MCO-I’s IMS policy is stated in section 2.4. This policy is shared with all MCO-I employees and
is the foundation of this IMS, supported by top management, shared with customers and
reviewed in all management reviews.
Organizational roles, responsibilities, and authorities are defined to ensure that the IMS is
implemented. Figure 2 shows the Company’s IMS organization chart.
(2) IMS System Support – Provide support to IMRs, Divisions and Departments for all matters
related to the IMS including documentation creation, control and auditing.
6. Planning
x Planning process
o MCO-I routinely evaluates risks and opportunities to achieve the outcomes of the IMS,
to reduce potential of undesired effects and to achieve continual improvement.
x Departments and IMRs consider
o external and internal issues referred to in Section 4.1;
o requirements referred to in Section 4.2; and
o the scope of the IMS.
x IMRs create action plans and identify KPIs, maintain and routinely review these to drive
initiatives and actions and confirm effectiveness.
x IMRs and departments create tracking and monitoring to ensure compliance and continual
improvement of KPIs.
x MCO-I evaluates relative risk criteria and assigns actions as noted below:
ISO 9001 Products and 1_IMS Risk Register Business Process Risk, Define Mitigation Actions, Provide
Services (Sample Table 4-3), Project Concerns, Standard Training / Verify Top Critical
2_Project Risk Resource Constraints / Drivers and Likelihood, Assign
Reviews, Product and Process Owners, Determine CAPA or
3_Functional Defect Defects (NCR’s), New Opportunity, Follow-up for
Data Analysis Technologies Effectiveness
ISO 14001 Environmental Risk Register Review New Employees, Provide Standard Training, Verify Top
Aspects and / Continuous Language Barriers Critical Drivers and Likelihood,
Compliance Assessment of Leading to Spillage, Assign Owners, Determine CAPA,
Obligations Impacts by EHS Changes to EPA Follow-up for Effectiveness
regulations, Hurricane
flooding
ISO 45001 Safety Risk Register Review New Employees, Create Emergency Response Plans,
Hazards and / Continuous OSHA Requirement Provide Standard Training, Verify Top
Compliance Assessment by EHS Gaps, Customer Critical Drivers and Likelihood,
Obligations Property, Field Risks Assign Owners, Determine CAPA,
Follow-up for Effectiveness
ISO 27001 Information Risk Register Review Data Security Breach or Provide Standard Training, Verify Top
Technology / Continuous Loss, Natural Disasters, Critical Drivers and Likelihood,
Security Assessment by IT Data Storage Assign Owners, Determine CAPA,
Limitations, New Follow-up for Effectiveness
Technologies
x Potential emergency situations: IMRs will anticipate and determine potential emergency
situations, and devise planning to prevent, respond or contain these.
Objectives follow board and executive review and approval process, followed by cascading
of objectives to the rest of MCO-I and inclusion of key KPIs into tracking mechanisms.
Regular status reviews are conducted and actions are determined when KPIs are trending
unfavorably. The business is kept informed of critical KPI performance through town hall
meetings and other communication methods.
Specific annual objectives for Quality, Health, Safety, Environmental and IT are cascaded
and tracked on run charts and reported monthly for
x Quality
x Environmental
x Health
x Safety
x Information Security
Department managers and IMRs conduct regular performance reviews in their areas.
Changes to the IMS: MCO-I document owners, IMRs and top management may request and
implement changes as they apply to product, services, quality, health, safety, environmental and
information security changes by following proper authorizations. Significant changes may also be
proposed during Management Reviews. Before undertaking, these should be confirmed as
adequate, suitable, and effective. There should also be a purpose for the change, it should not
degrade the integrity of the IMS, there must be resources available to assign and there must be an
owner to verify that the change is made and managed going forward.
Management of Change (MOC): For issues that may present high or unknown organizational risk
or challenges, there is the MOC process. The process is initiated on Share Point and allows any
change to be evaluated at the correct level of review. Anyone in MCO-I can submit the
request. The MOC request is reviewed by their manager and if considered outside the scope of
their team, is escalated. It is given a rating of Tier 1 (QHSE review) or Tier 2 (Senior Management
review). The changes are evaluated, risk-rated and tracked in the system until mitigated.
SOP-3-090-2017-S (Rev. 4) 18/47
7. Support
7.1 Resources
MCO-I top management determines and provides the resources needed for the
establishment, implementation, maintenance and continual improvement of the IMS.
7.2 Competence
Competence management is used to acquire and verify the necessary abilities of workers
doing work which affects MCO-I health, safety, environmental, quality and information
security performance and its ability to fulfil its compliance obligations. MCO-I’s criteria for
specification, selection and on-going development of resource is as follows:
x Top management picks competent leaders, approves target objectives and ensures
adequate resources are provided to meet the intended outcome of the IMS. Competence in
position is measured by individual contributions to the programs, compliance in reporting and
results, participation in auditing, and corrective and preventive actions that minimize risks of
unintended outcomes.
x Department managers and IMRs review and select team members for support personnel
opportunities they deem competent. They also determine trainings and frequencies to be
administered to these and all other employees as part of IMS program awareness.
Department managers and IMRs provide education and OJT on applicable health, safety,
quality, information security and laws and regulations to their practitioners who evaluate
compliance obligations.
x General required trainings for the IMS are created by the IMRs and administered using the
E-learning system which includes testing competence as part of the training.
x SOP’s can be administered over the E-learning system or by OJT. Supervisors maintain
competency training records in coordination with Human Resources.
x Department and the IMR will set forth emergency response competency and necessary
training plans in individual emergency response procedures or manuals.
x Internal auditors require certification and may be internal or third party as coordinated by the
IMS Support and the IMR. Internal audits are conducted per the internal audit procedure:
Internal Audit, (SOP-3-091-2023-S).
SOP-3-090-2017-S (Rev. 4) 20/47
7.3 Awareness
Department managers and the IMRs ensure that workers doing work under the department (i.e.,
workers covered in the scope of this Manual as well as representatives of in-plant contractors)
are aware of the following requirements of general health, safety, environmental, quality and
information technology security education through training and daily work:
7.4 Communication
7.4.1 General
IMRs establish, implement, and maintain the process needed for internal and external
communications relevant to the IMS.
x The IMRs ensure Annual Communication Plans are created (see chart below).
Department managers will develop their own communication plans as appropriate to
the IMS including:
o Information to communicate
o Timing of communication
o Recipient of communication
o Method of communication
o Party who communicates
x When developing their communication plan, Departments and the IMRs take into
account their compliance obligations; and ensure that information communicated is
consistent with information generated within the IMS, and is reliable.
Internal
Company HSE IMR – M - FY EHS objectives, Company HSE — Yes
Committee Environmental, action plan, status Committee / E-Mail
members Safety - Activity vs previous Yr and SharePoint
- Any other important Update of Monthly
EHS topics Action Plan Report
Officers President and W Strategic initiatives and Reports, discussion Corporate Yes
Officers objective performance
reviews
President and VP QHSE and Q Management Reviews Record Update on — Yes
Staff IMRs (Quality, Safety, Share Point,
Environmental, IT) Presentation,
Discussion
President and All MCO-I Q Town Hall – State of Verbal, presentation No
Staff Employees the business
Department Department As Req Performance review / Reports, issues, __ No
staffs leaders customer deliverables verbal updates and
discussion
Departmental Practitioner As Req Preventive Checks & Tracking Tools and — Yes
practitioners Monitoring Logs
External
Registrar IMRs Y Certification and Certified Auditors ISO Standards Yes
Compliance Audits
3rd Party IMRs Y Internal Audit Formal internal audit ISO Yes
Auditor Assessments Standards
KDDI and IT Director Y in Q1 Vulnerability Email Yes Yes
Seccuris Assessment Report
MHI Auditors IT Director Y in Q3 CLC and PEFR Email Yes Yes
Assessment
MAS Auditors IT Director Y in Q3 SAP role review Email Yes Yes
OSHA HSE Coordinator Y OSHA 300 Log and Web Portal Interface Yes Yes
Summary
3rd Party QHSE Specialist AR Safety, Insurance, Web Portal Interface Yes Live Record
Certification Quality Status –
Services Pre-Requisite to Work
Pearland City Facilities / HSE Y Wastewater Survey Email Yes Yes
Public Works Coordinator
MCO HSE Coordinator Y Environmental Data Email Yes Yes
Input Sheet
MHI CSR group Yin May CSR report and (1) Domain data ΔResponse Yes
Environmental corporate website (2) CSR Committee UN Global
Committee Approval Compact
(3) Print / website
MHI IMR - Y in Jun GHG emissions (Scope (1) Collection of data — Option
Environmental Environmental 1 to 3) by each Domain
Committee (2) Approval from
EMR
(3) Print / website
MCO VP Mfg M Mfg Performance Web Conference No Yes
Oasis HR W Payroll/Benefits Web portal/phone Yes Yes
Mgr./Generalist calls
MC/MHI HR Manager Q Training lists/status Email/Spreadsheets Yes Yes
Dept. of Labor HR/Oasis Y Headcount/employee Oasis Yes Yes
data
Customers MCO-I Sales As Req NPS, Ads, Tech Web, E-Mail, ERP No Yes
Support, Orders
SOP-3-090-2017-S (Rev. 4) 22/47
Department managers at each level and function of the Company communicate information by
means of meetings, systems, training sessions, and internal notification emails or in any other
ways based on their annual communication plans and whenever necessary. This is to ensure
that the internal communication enables workers doing work under direction of MCO-I are
compliant and contribute to continual improvement.
Respective IMR will, whenever necessary, internally communicate the following information to
departmental HSE committee members and practitioners or, as appropriate, to all employees:
x Information relevant to the Safety, Environmental Quality or IT management as well as
changes to the IMS including changes to the MCO-I policy and this Manual
x When a new employee is assigned to MCO-I, HR will assign a regimen of training to include
safety, environmental, quality and information technology security training as an onboarding
process, as a rule, within a month after the employment to raise his or her awareness of
environmental, safety, quality and information security activities and considerations.
Department specific training for safety, quality, environmental and information security may
also be required and will be provided by the department.
x Departmental HSE committee members and practitioners will internally communicate
information within their departments in response to internal communication from the IMR.
Topics vary based on interested party relationship to MCO-I. Records maintained if required.
SOP-3-090-2017-S (Rev. 4) 23/47
7.5.1 General
Departments and IMS Support control documents as follows:
(b) Documented information determined by Departments and the IMRs as being necessary
for the effectiveness of the IMS.
IT Systems Landscape:
SOP-3-090-2017-S (Rev. 4) 25/47
8. Operation
Regarding Hazards and Risks to E, H&S, MCO-I approaches with the following controls order:
1. identify the hazard
2. eliminate the hazard
3. substitute less hazardous material, process or equipment
4. apply engineering controls
5. apply administrative controls
6. prescribe use of PPE
8.2.3.1 MCO-I confirms its ability to meet the requirements for products and services to be offered to
customers. Reviews are conducted prior to committing to supply products and services that include:
x customer requirements, including delivery and post-delivery activity requirements;
x non-customer requirements necessary for the specified or intended use, when known;
x requirements specified by the MCO-I;
x statutory and regulatory requirements applicable to the products and services;
x contract or order requirements differing from those previously expressed.
MCO-I makes every effort to ensure that contract or order requirements differing from those
previously defined are resolved. The customer’s requirements are confirmed by MCO-I before
acceptance, when the customer does not provide a documented statement of their requirements.
8.3.1 General
MCO-I maintains a design and development process that is appropriate to ensure the subsequent
provision of products and services.
*Design and development reviews, verification and validation have distinct purposes. They can be
conducted separately or in any combination, as is suitable for the products and services of MCO-I.
8.4.1 General
MCO-I ensures that externally provided processes, products and services conform to IMS
requirements. MCO-I determines the controls to be applied to externally provided processes,
products and services when:
x products and services from external providers are intended for incorporation into MCO-I’s
own products and services;
x products and services are provided directly to the customer(s) by external providers on
behalf of MCO-I;
x a process, or part of a process, is provided by an external provider as a result of a decision
by MCO-I.
MCO-I determines and applies criteria for the evaluation, selection, and monitoring of performance
of external providers, based on their ability to provide processes or products and services in
accordance with requirements.
MCO-I retains documented information of these activities and any necessary actions arising from
the evaluations.
MCO-I ensures that externally provided processes, products and services do not adversely affect
MCO-I’s ability to consistently deliver conforming products and services to its customers.
MCO-I:
x ensures that externally provided processes remain within the control of its quality
management system;
x defines both the controls that it intends to apply to an external provider and those it intends
to apply to the resulting output;
x takes into consideration:
o the potential impact of the externally provided processes, products and services on
the organization’s ability to consistently meet customer and applicable statutory and
regulatory requirements;
o the effectiveness of the controls applied by the external provider;
x determines the verification, or other activities, necessary to ensure that the externally
provided processes, products and services meet requirements.
SOP-3-090-2017-S (Rev. 4) 29/47
MCO-I ensures the adequacy of requirements prior to their communication to the external provider.
MCO-I:
x uses suitable means to identify outputs when it is necessary to ensure the conformity of
products and services.
x identifies the status of outputs with respect to monitoring and measurement requirements
throughout production and service provision.
x controls the unique identification of the outputs when traceability is a requirement, and shall
retain the documented information necessary to enable traceability.
SOP-3-090-2017-S (Rev. 4) 30/47
8.5.4 Preservation
MCO-I preserve the outputs during production and service provision, to the extent necessary to
ensure conformity to requirements.
* Preservation can include identification, handling, contamination control, packaging, storage,
transmission or transportation, and protection.
8.7.1 MCO-I ensures that outputs that do not conform to their requirements are identified and
controlled to prevent their unintended use or delivery.
MCO-I takes appropriate action based on the nature of the nonconformity and its effect on the
conformity of products and services. This also applies to nonconforming products and services
detected after delivery of products, during or after the provision of services.
MCO-I deals with nonconforming outputs in one or more of the following ways:
x correction;
x segregation, containment, return or suspension of provision of products and services;
x informing the customer;
x obtaining authorization for acceptance under concession.
Conformity to the requirements are verified when nonconforming outputs are corrected.
9. Performance evaluation
9.1 Monitoring, measurement, analysis, and evaluation
9.1.1 General
(1) Actions
Departments and the IMR determine:
(a) what needs to be monitored and measured and the affect or inclusion in business KPIs;
(b) the methods for monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation, as applicable, to
ensure valid results;
(c) the criteria against which MCO-I will evaluate its performance, and appropriate
indicators;
(d) when the monitoring and measuring will be performed;
(e) when the results from monitoring and measurement will be analyzed and evaluated.
Departments and the IMRs retain the recorded results from the monitoring, measurement,
analysis, and evaluation of the performance.
Considerations:
x Product and service conformity
x Customer satisfaction – survey, meeting feedback, market share changes, warranty
x Was plan followed effectively
x Effectiveness of risk and opportunity actions
x Performance of external providers
x Delivery, cost or schedule impacts
x Need for IMS system improvements
The IMS Support and IMR undergo the review of effectiveness of safety, environmental,
quality or information security performance and IMS for each fiscal year.
The internal audit program and the IMR take into consideration the importance of safety,
quality, environmental and information technology security processes concerned, changes
affecting MCO-I, and the results of previous audits.
When conducting an internal audit, the IMR and IMS System Support:
x define the audit criteria and scope for each audit;
x select auditors and conduct audits to ensure objectivity and the impartiality of the audit
process;
x ensure that the results of the audits are reported to relevant management.
x take appropriate corrections and corrective actions as soon as possible
10. Improvement
10.1 General
Departments and the IMR implement necessary actions for opportunities for improvement from
performance evaluation, internal audits, and management review results, in order to achieve
the intended outcomes of its IMS. These may include:
x Response to nonconformity
o Evaluate and take appropriate action to control and correct it, deal with the
consequences of the nonconformity, including mitigating adverse impacts:
Lower level risks require evaluation and correction or possibly no action
Mid-level risks require analysis, corrective and possibly preventive measures
High level risks require failure analysis with corresponding actions to prevent
reoccurrence
x Evaluate the need for action to eliminate the causes of the nonconformity, in order that it
does not recur or occur elsewhere, by:
o reviewing the nonconformity;
o determining the causes of the nonconformity;
o determining if similar nonconformities exist, or could potentially occur
o implementing any action needed;
o review the effectiveness of any corrective action taken; and
o making changes to the IMS if necessary.
x Corrective and preventive actions must be appropriate to the significance of the effects of
the nonconformities encountered, including the environmental impacts. Departments and
IMRs assign the correct level of response based on experience and risk.
Poka-Yoke - To mistake proof something. This can be done mechanically or through a system to prevent defects. Example: adding a
taper and key-way to make sure a gear can only go on one way.
SOP-3-090-2017-S (Rev. 4) 37/47
Human Resources
Corporate Secretary
Accounting
Manufacturing / Production
Operations
Planning and Facilities
Warehouse and Logistics
Sales & Marketing
New Unit Business
Customer Service Business
Parts and Service
Technical Service and Asset Management
Training
SOP-3-090-2017-S (Rev. 4) 38/47
Plan
1. Scope (except)
In consistency with the Company’s
Support integrated management system,
Leadership and
Improvement and Do
worker participation intended outcomes of the
Act operation
management system include:
- Improvement in ESQ & IT
performance
- Fulfillment of compliance obligations
A hi t f ESQ & IT bj ti
Performance
evaluation
Check
Intended outcome of
integrated
For each standard, a minimum list of interested parties is identified and maintained by the respective
IMR. Interested party registers for ISO 14001, ISO 27001 and ISO 45001 are on the MCO-I IMS
system. Registers are reviewed at the respective management reviews and on an as needed basis.
See Annual Communication Plan in the communication section of this document for managing the
IMS communication needs, addressing the what, when, with whom and how to communicate.
The chart below illustrates the interested parties for ISO 9001:
ISO
9001 External Customer Needs and Expectations
IMS SOPs
MCO-I Integrated Management System Quality
General SOP-3-090-2017-S
(manual)
General SOP-3-023-2028-S Employee Handbook Human Resources
ISO 9001:2015
7.1.5 SOP-3-092-2018-S Calibration Process Quality
8.51 SOP-3-072-2090-S, 2091 Production Cost Control/ Risk Assessment Manufacturing/ Production
SOP-3-072-4272-WF, Manufacturing/ Production
8.5 Manufacturing process
4270, 4285, 4286
8 SOP-3-066-2174-S Engineering Deliverable Management Engineering
ISO 14001:2015
10 SP PORTAL HSE CAPA tracker HSE
ISO 27001:2013
4-8 SOP-3-100-1001-P IT Security Policy Information Technology
ISO 9001:2015
6 SP Portal Process Control and Risk Assessment Quality
ISO 14001:2015
6, 9.1.1 SOP-3-123-4112-R EMS Workbook Record HSE
ISO 45001:2018
8.2 SP Portal –Bus. Rec. Emergency Action Plan Records HSE
ISO 27001:2013
4-8 SP Portal –Bus. Rec. IT Security Records Information Technology
SOP-3-090-2017-S (Rev. 4) 42/47
Attached Table 4-3: Process Control and Risk Assessment Plan for IMS
1. Form and Procedure Sample
Process
Evaluation
Process Methods to Documen
Responsible Identified Method
Step Name / Inputs Outputs Ensure Required Risk Score ted
Person / Risks and (How Risk
Number Operation Required Expected Effective Resources (1, 2 or 3) Informati
Group Opportunities is
Description Operation on
Managed)
Risks
Identified?
Marketing
x Corporate communications such as public relations
x Brochures, trade shows, articles, advertisement, press
communications, videos
Sales Department - Duties related to:
x Profit and loss management
x Short-term business plans;
x Sales activities for inquires;
Technical - Duties related to:
z Coordinating inquires;
Sales and Marketing
z Providing technical proposals and services to customers;
z Conducting technical negotiations with customers; and
NUB and CSB
z Master plans including equipment selection and technological study
z Provide training and installation-related information
Commercial – Duties related to:
x Conducting commercial negotiations
x Conducting contract negotiations
x Receive PO; release invoicing & request for payment
x Track commercial project execution
x Controls and reports financials to controller
SOP-3-090-2017-S (Rev. 4) 44/47
In House Engineering
x Product planning;
x Drawing and part number creation
x Coordinating in-house design standards, internal and external
engineering standards, and specifications;
x Reverse engineering;
x Engineering and detailed design for compression systems,
equipment technologies, and piping structural technologies
x Instrument & Electrical Engineering Section - Duties related to
engineering and detailed design for instrumentation, electrical, and
control technologies
Engineering & Design Application Engineering Group - Duties related to the following activities:
x Providing engineering-related support for new sectors and inquiries
about mega projects
x Providing technical proposals to the Global Marketing & Sales
Division
x Providing technical assistance to the Global Marketing & Sales
Division in relation to services
x Providing assistance to the Global Marketing & Sales Division in
developing master plans including equipment selection and
technological study for inquiries
Project Management Group - Duties related to:
x Coordinating projects; and
x Coordinating company-wide system development
Information Technology
QHSE
Procurement
Design
Production / Service
Human Resources
No.
Attached Table 8-1: Operational Planning and Control – Lifecycle Perspective Consideration
Revision History
Revision Approved Reviewed Prepared
Date Reasons by by by
Number
1 Feb 21, 2018 Add Tenets. Add MOC process Rominger Moir Jamerson