Tec h n i q u e s i n S e p t o p l a s t y

Traditional Versus Endoscopic Approaches

Janki Shah, MD, Christopher R. Roxbury, MD, Raj Sindwani, MD*

KEYWORDS
 Septoplasty  Septal deviation  Endoscopic septoplasty  Open septoplasty
 Nasal obstruction

KEY POINTS
 Surgical correction of a deviated septum can be addressed using the traditional open en-
donasal approach, the endoscopic approach, or the open septorhinoplasty approach.
 Thorough knowledge of the anatomy and physiology of the nose and sound operative
technique are necessary to perform a successful septoplasty using either approach.
 Compared with the traditional open technique, the endoscopic septoplasty provides
enhanced visualization of nasal anatomy and is particularly advantageous in addressing
issues of the posterior septum.
 Caudal deformities are most readily addressed using open techniques.
 The location and severity of the septal deformity, along with surgeon experience and pref-
erence, play an important role in the selection of the septoplasty technique.

INTRODUCTION

The nasal septum is an integral support structure of the nose. Deviation or deformity of
the septum can cause nasal obstruction, the most common complaint in the average
rhinologic practice.1 If conservative medical management is unsuccessful in relieving
symptoms of obstruction, surgical intervention to correct the septal deformity is indi-
cated. Septoplasty is one of the most well-established and commonly performed pro-
cedures in otolaryngology. Although most often performed to fix structural deformities
resulting in nasal obstruction, surgical correction of a deviated nasal septum may also
be indicated in cases of recurrent epistaxis, sinusitis, obstructive sleep apnea, and
facial pain/headaches secondary to septal spurs contacting the lateral nasal wall
(Sluder syndrome). Additionally, septoplasty may be necessary for improved access
during endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), endoscopic orbital procedures (eg,

Disclosure Statement: The authors have no personal or financial conflicts of interest or disclosures
regarding any of the material discussed within this article.
Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue A71, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: [email protected]

Otolaryngol Clin N Am - (2018) -–-

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2018.05.007 oto.theclinics.com
0030-6665/18/ª 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
2 Shah et al

dacryocystorhinostomy, orbital decompression), and endoscopic endonasal skull

base procedures.2,3
The 3 main approaches used to perform septoplasty include the traditional open
endonasal approach, the recently popularized endoscopic approach, and the external
open or open septorhinoplasty approach. First described by Freer4 and Killian5 in the
early twentieth century, the traditional approach to address a deviated nasal septum
involves direct visualization using headlight illumination and a nasal speculum. Alter-
natively, endoscopic septoplasty, which was initially described by Lanza and col-
leagues6 and Stammberger7 in 1991, involves the use of rigid endoscopes for
visualization and targeted correction of any deformities. Both techniques can be
used to address nasal septal deviations and have been shown to have similar func-
tional outcomes.8–11 The external open approach, which is often used to address
markedly caudally deviated septa with accompanying external nasal deformities, is
not discussed in this article.

RELEVANT ANATOMY OF THE NASAL SEPTUM

A thorough understanding of the anatomy of the nasal septum is necessary when per-
forming a septoplasty. The nasal septum has both functional and cosmetic signifi-
cance and serves many purposes, including separating the nasal airway into 2
distinct cavities, providing dorsal support, maintaining the shape of the columella
and nasal tip, and regulating airflow through the nose. Composed of membranous,
cartilaginous, and osseous components, the nasal septum is the main support struc-
ture of the nose. The membranous septum, composed of fibrofatty tissue, is located
anteriorly between the columellar lower lateral cartilages, whereas the cartilaginous
septum, formed by the quadrangular cartilage, is just posterior to the membranous
portion of the septum. The quadrangular cartilage has attachments to the upper
and lower lateral cartilages anteriorly, the maxillary crest inferiorly, and the bony
septum posteriorly. The osseous components of the septum include the vomer pos-
teriorly, the perpendicular plate of the ethmoid postero-superiorly, and the nasal crest
of the maxillary and palatine bones inferiorly. The perpendicular plate of the ethmoid
bone is continuous with the cribriform plate superiorly and the sphenoid rostrum
postero-superiorly, whereas the vomer fuses with the maxillary crest inferiorly
(Fig. 1). Of note, the nasal septum forms the medial aspect of the internal nasal valve,
the narrowest point of the nasal airway, where minute deviations in the septal structure
can significantly affect airflow resistance and result in symptoms of nasal obstruction.
The nasal septal swell body (or septal turbinate) is a normal, highly conserved compo-
nent of the anterior nasal septum that should not be confused with a septal deviation.
This mucosal-lined, fusiform swelling located anterior to the middle turbinate head and
superior to the level of the inferior turbinate is readily identified on examination and im-
aging studies. Although little is known regarding its function, its anatomic location near
the internal nasal valve and its histologic composition of both glandular and vasoerec-
tile tissues suggest it may play a role in regulating nasal airflow.12
The nasal septum is lined with pseudostratified ciliated columnar respiratory epithe-
lium along the inferior two-thirds and often contains olfactory epithelium along the su-
perior one-third. The lateral surfaces of the septal cartilage and bones are covered
with the mucoperichondrium and mucoperiosteum, respectively, which contain the
blood supply and innervation of the septum. The nasal septum has a rich vascular sup-
ply originating from both the internal and external carotid arteries. The internal carotid
artery supplies the septum via the anterior and posterior ethmoidal divisions of
ophthalmic artery, which both course medially to traverse the roof of the nasal cavity
 Techniques in Septoplasty 3

Fig. 1. Anatomy of nasal septum. (Courtesy of David Schumick, BS, CMI; with the permission
of the Cleveland Clinic Center for Medical Art & Photography ª 2018. All Rights Reserved.)

and supply the superior part of the nasal septum. The external carotid artery provides
most of the blood supply to the nasal mucosa via terminal branches of the facial and
internal maxillary arteries. The facial artery supplies the anterior septum via the septal
branch of the superior labial artery, whereas the internal maxillary artery gives rise to
the greater palatine artery, which supplies the inferior septum, and the sphenopalatine
artery, which supplies most of the lateral nasal wall and posterior septum. Anastomo-
ses of these arterial branches gives rise to the Kiesselbach plexus along the anterior
septum bilaterally, a common site of epistaxis (Fig. 2). The trigeminal nerve (cranial
nerve [CN] V) provides innervation to the nasal mucosa. The nasopalatine nerve, a
branch of the maxillary nerve (CN V2), innervates the posteroinferior aspect of the
nasal mucosa, whereas the anterior ethmoidal nerves, branches of the nasociliary

Fig. 2. Nasal septal vasculature. (From Viehweg TL, Roberson JB, Hudson JW. Epistaxis: diag-
nosis and treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;64(3):512; with permission.)
4 Shah et al

nerve from the ophthalmic nerve (CN VI), innervate the supero-anterior portion of the
nasal mucosa. Superiorly, the olfactory nerve (CN I) provides innervation to the mu-
cosa via small nerve endings that transverse the cribriform plate.13

HISTORY OF SEPTOPLASTY

Surgery for correction of a deviated nasal septum has evolved over the course of many
years. The first known accounts describing correction of nasal septal deformities can
be found in ancient Egyptian medical literature dating as far back as 3500 BC. In the
late nineteenth century, the Bosworth operation, which involved removing the devia-
tion along with the overlying mucosa, was the most common procedure to correct
nasal obstruction secondary to septal deviation.14 Other early techniques discussed
fracturing and splinting of the septum.15
In the early twentieth century, Killian5 and Freer4 described the submucous resec-
tion (SMR) operation, which has formed the foundation of modern septoplasty tech-
niques. This technique involves raising the mucoperichondral flaps and resecting
the cartilaginous and bony septum while leaving the overlying mucosa intact and leav-
ing a 1-cm dorsal and 1-cm caudal segment, termed the L-strut, to maintain support
(Fig. 3). The mucosal sparing technique, however, was less effective in correcting de-
viation of the caudal septum.4,5 To address this, Metzenbaum16 recommended the
use of the swinging door technique in 1929, whereas Peer17 advocated removing
the caudal septum, straightening it, and then replacing it in the midline position in
1937. In 1948, Cottle and Loring18 introduced the practice of conservative septal carti-
lage resections and replacement of bone and cartilage in the intramucosal space in an
effort to avoid complications, including large septal perforations, saddle nose defor-
mity, and columellar retraction, seen in patients who had undergone the SMR proced-
ure and significant cartilage resection. More recently, Lanza and colleagues6 and
Stammberger7 described endoscopic septoplasty, which has allowed septal pathol-
ogies to be addressed in a more directed fashion.

Fig. 3. L-shaped cartilaginous strut that must be left dorsally and caudally for nasal support.
(Courtesy of David Schumick, BS, CMI; with the permission of the Cleveland Clinic Center for
Medical Art & Photography ª 2018. All Rights Reserved.)
 Techniques in Septoplasty 5

TECHNIQUES IN SEPTOPLASTY

A cornerstone of the otolaryngologist’s practice, septoplasty ranks as the third most

common head and neck operation, with approximately 260,000 cases performed
each year in the ambulatory setting.19 The modern septoplasty has evolved into a
more conservative procedure than the initially described SMR technique and involves
resection of the targeted area of the deviated septum and may include modification
and/or replacement of a cartilage graft. Despite its variations, each septoplasty tech-
nique is based on the fundamental principles of intact flap elevation, mucosal preser-
vation, careful reapproximation, and preservation of dorsal and caudal supporting
struts.

TRADITIONAL SEPTOPLASTY

The traditional septoplasty is typically performed under general anesthesia using

nasal speculums and headlight illumination for visualization. The nasal mucosa is
decongested using topical epinephrine, oxymetazoline, or 4% cocaine. One percent
lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine is then injected along the septum bilaterally in a
subperichondral plane in an anterior to posterior fashion until the mucosa is well
blanched. The injection assists not only with local anesthesia and hemostasis but
also with hydro-dissection. After allowing adequate time for vasoconstriction, either
a Killian or hemi-transfixion incision is made using a 15 blade extending through the
mucosa and perichondrium but sparing the cartilage itself. The side of the incision
depends on surgeon preference. The Killian incision is placed approximately 1 to
2 cm posterior to the caudal septal margin and is useful when the septal deviation
involves only the middle to posterior aspect of the septum. It does not provide
adequate access to the anterior septum and is, thus, not used for caudal septal de-
viations. Alternatively, the hemi-transfixion incision, which is made at the caudal
border of the septum, allows adequate exposure and is used when the caudal
portion of the septum is involved. A curved elevator, such as the Cottle or Freer
elevator, is then carefully used to dissect within a subperichondral plane and elevate
the perichondrium and mucosa from the cartilage in an intact fashion. The dissection
is continued broadly over and beyond the septal deformity, with care taken during
flap elevation along the septal deviation or spur to avoid tearing the mucosa at these
sites. Longer nasal speculums are used as needed throughout the procedure to
ensure adequate visualization.
After the ipsilateral flap is elevated, the Cottle elevator or a 15 blade is used to
gently incise the cartilage anterior to the site of the deviation and the contralateral
flap is elevated. Care is taken to avoid tearing through the contralateral mucosa at
the time of the cartilage incision and contralateral flap elevation to prevent septal
perforation. Of note, an adequate L-strut is preserved to prevent loss of external
nasal support and subsequent external deformity. Once both mucoperichondral flaps
are elevated, the Cottle elevator, scissors, True-cut forceps, or Jansen Middleton for-
ceps can be used to incise the cartilage superiorly and inferiorly to isolate the
segment of deviated septum. The remaining deformity is then grasped using forceps,
separated from its posterior attachment using a rotational movement in an anterior-
posterior axis, and subsequently removed. It is important to ensure that the mucosa
is not accidentally damaged when grasping the deviated segment. In addition, one
must be careful to avoid a pulling or twisting motion outside of the anterior-
posterior axis when maneuvering the deviated segment, as this could fracture the
cribriform plate and result in a cerebrospinal fluid leak. Any remaining posterior
bony deviation can be subsequently resected using True-cut or Jansen Middleton
6 Shah et al

forceps. Of note, if the deviated segment of the septum is large, modifications of

cartilage with cartilaginous scoring or weakening incisions can be used to minimize
the extent of resected septal cartilage; alternatively, the removed cartilage can be
morselized and replaced.
Once the septal deformity is resected, the mucoperichondral flaps are reapproxi-
mated and the initial mucosal incision is closed using an absorbable suture. A quilting
stitch, nonabsorbable packing, or secured nasal splints are sometimes placed bilater-
ally to compress the flaps together. Patients are started on appropriate antibiotics with
Staphylococcus aureus coverage as prophylaxis for toxic shock syndrome secondary
to nasal packing. When used, the nasal packing or splints are removed in the clinic 3 to
5 days postoperatively.

ENDOSCOPIC SEPTOPLASTY

Endoscopic septoplasty is very similar to the traditional approach. However, instead

of a nasal speculum and headlight, rigid nasal endoscopes are used for illumination
and visualization throughout the procedure. Often performed in conjunction with
ESS, endoscopic septoplasty requires similar instrumentation and set up as these
procedures. Under visualization using a 0 endoscope, the nasal mucosa is decon-
gested and anesthetized as described with the traditional technique, and the location
and severity of the septal deformity is examined. If the procedure is being performed
for improved access and visualization before ESS, the position of the septum in rela-
tion to the middle turbinate is noted. A more posteriorly positioned modified Killian
incision is made for complex or broad-based deviations, whereas a mucosal incision
immediately anterior to or over the deformity is made for focal deviations or isolated
septal spurs. Using a Cottle elevator, flaps are then elevated in a subperichondral or
subperiosteal plane as previously described over the deviated cartilage or bone,
with care taken to avoid mucosal tears in the area of thinned mucosa at the site of
the deformity. The septal cartilage is then sharply incised, ensuring at least 1 cm of
caudal and dorsal strut for nasal support. As described by Seth and colleagues,20
the inferior turbinate concha and middle turbinate axilla are reliable landmarks; placing
the mucosal incision at or posterior to the conchal line and at or inferior to the axillary
line as defined in the study will result in adequate L-strut preservation. The mucoper-
ichondral flap is then raised on the contralateral side, and the cartilaginous and/or
osseous deformity is resected in a similar manner to that used in the traditional
approach using a combination of True-cut, Jansen-Middleton, and Takahashi forceps.
Some investigators have also described using the powered microdebrider to remove
the deviated septum.9,21,22 As with the nasal speculum in the traditional approach, the
endoscope is used throughout the procedure in endoscopic septoplasty and can be
placed between mucosal flaps and within the nasal cavity to ensure adequate resec-
tion of the septal deviation. Once this is completed, the mucosal flaps are repositioned
and the mucosal incision and dead space created are closed with an absorbable su-
ture. A quilting suture, nasal splints, or packing can be used as previously described to
further reapproximate the flaps. It is worth mentioning that with the endoscopic
approach, all steps of the operation described, from injection through incision and
cartilage resection to suture placement, can be performed using the endoscope. A
nasal speculum is not required.

TRADITIONAL VERSUS ENDOSCOPIC APPROACH

Although studies8–11 comparing endoscopic septoplasty with the traditional technique

have shown similar patient outcomes, surgical results, and comparable operative
 Techniques in Septoplasty 7

times, the endoscopic technique offers several advantages over the open approach
and may be indicated in certain clinical situations. By providing superior visualization
of tissue planes with optimal illumination and magnification, the endoscopic approach
allows the surgeon to more accurately evaluate the nasal anatomy and precisely and
selectively remove the segments of the deviated septum. This ability is particularly
useful in cases of isolated septal pathologies, such as distinct deviations or spurs
that can be directly addressed. The endoscopic approach may also be helpful for sub-
mucoperichondral flap elevation during revision cases in which tissue planes are less
obvious. In addition, the use of the endoscope may enhance the experience of resi-
dents and fellows and enables better teaching, as it projects the procedure onto a
monitor. Limitations with the endoscopic technique have to do with the challenges
of controlling the endoscope when operating very anteriorly in the nose where the nos-
tril is not adequately available to support the endoscope (so-called free handing). For
this reason, most surgeons consider caudal deflections a relative contraindication to
the endoscopic technique and would favor open approaches in this clinical setting. In-
dications for the endoscopic approach, thus, include more posterior deviations of the
septum without involvement of the caudal septum. In addition, as it is performed using
similar instrumentation to ESS, endoscopic septoplasty can be performed in conjunc-
tion with ESS if necessary for improved access to the sinuses. Endoscopic septo-
plasty is contraindicated in cases of significant caudal deviations or a crooked
nose, and the traditional open technique is preferred in cases of caudal septal devia-
tions or severe septal deviations. Ultimately, the location and severity of the septal
deformity along with surgeon experience and preference will play an important role
in the selection of the septoplasty technique. Surgeons may opt to use a combined
approach to take advantage of the unique benefits offered by each approach.

COMPLICATIONS

Complications that can occur after septoplasty are nearly identical for both the tradi-
tional and endoscopic approaches. Persistent nasal obstruction is the most common
complication, followed by septal perforation and external nasal deformity. Continuing
sensation of nasal obstruction after surgery can be associated with incomplete repair
of severe deviations, which require a more aggressive approach for correction. Septal
perforations may result from unrepaired opposing mucoperichondral tears or can also
occur as a result of vascular compromise of mucosa after postoperative hematoma or
abscess. Overall, septal perforations are less likely to occur if mucosal flaps are kept
intact during elevation. Risk of nasal deformities, such as tip ptosis or saddle nose
deformity, which usually result from over-resection of the caudal septum or loss of
dorsal nasal support, can be minimized by maintaining an adequate L-strut during
septoplasty.1–3,9,23
Other complications can include epistaxis, septal hematoma, septal abscess, syn-
echiae formation, and injury to the nasopalatine nerve with subsequent dental pain
and hypesthesia. Although mild postoperative bleeding can occur, severe epistaxis af-
ter septoplasty is uncommon. Patients should be instructed to avoid the use of med-
ications that can increase the risk of bleeding and to avoid strenuous activity and
heavy lifting in the immediate postoperative period. Nasal packing, stents, and quilting
sutures are thought to decrease the risk of postoperative bleeding and hematoma for-
mation. Dental pain and hypesthesia can occur after septoplasty, but this is usually
temporary and resolves within several weeks. Major complications, such as cerebro-
spinal fluid leak, unilateral blindness, and death, are extremely rare. In general,
although some studies have reported reduced rates of certain complications, such
8 Shah et al

as postoperative hemorrhage, mucosal adhesions, persistent deviation, and septal

tears, with the endoscopic technique compared with the traditional approach, overall
complication rates reported with endoscopic septoplasty are similar to those reported
in the literature for traditional septoplasty.9,23

SUMMARY

Surgical correction of a deviated septum can be performed using either the traditional
open or endoscopic septoplasty techniques. Although both approaches have compa-
rable outcomes and overall complication rates, the endoscopic approach offers
certain advantages compared with traditional open septoplasty in appropriately
selected patients. By providing enhanced visualization, the endoscopic technique al-
lows the surgeon to more accurately examine nasal anatomy and directly address iso-
lated septal pathologies with limited dissection. This visualization is also valuable for
the education of residents and fellows. The endoscopic technique is also advanta-
geous during ESS and during revision or complicated endoscopic cases, including
pituitary and skull base procedures. Thorough knowledge of the anatomy and physi-
ology of the nose and sound operative technique are necessary to perform a success-
ful septoplasty using either approach. The location and severity of the septal deformity
along with surgeon experience and preference play an important role in the selection
of the septoplasty technique.

REFERENCES

1. Konstantinidis I, Triaridis S, Triaridis A, et al. Long term results following nasal

septal surgery, focus on patient satisfaction. Auris Nasus Larynx 2005;32:369–74.
2. Fettman N, Sanford T, Sindwani R. Surgical management of the deviated septum:
techniques in septoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2009;42(2):241–52, viii.
3. Sautter NB, Smith TL. Endoscopic septoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2009;
42(2):253–60, viii.
4. Freer OT. The correction of deflections of the nasal septum with minimal trauma-
tism. JAMA 1902;38:636–42.
5. Killian G. The submucous window resection of the nasal septum. Ann Otol Rhinol
Laryngol 1905;14:363–93.
6. Lanza DC, Kennedy DW, Zinreich SJ. Nasal endoscopy and its surgical applica-
tions. In: Lee KJ, editor. Essential otolaryngology: head and neck surgery. 5th edi-
tion. New York: Medical Examination; 1991. p. 373–87.
7. Stammberger H. Special problems. In: Hawke M, editor. Functional endoscopic
sinus surgery: the Messerklinger technique. Philadelphia: BC Decker; 1991.
p. 432–3.
8. Chung BJ, Batra PS, Citardi MJ, et al. Endoscopic septoplasty: revisitation of the
technique, indications, and outcomes. Am J Rhinol 2007;21:307–11.
9. Getz AE, Hwang PH. Endoscopic septoplasty. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck
Surg 2008;16:26–31.
10. Hwang PH, McLaughlin RB, Lanza DC, et al. Endoscopic septoplasty: indica-
tions, technique, and results. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;120:678–82.
11. Stewart M, Smith T, Weaver E, et al. Outcomes after nasal septoplasty: results
from the nasal septoplasty effectiveness (NOSE) study. Otolaryngol Head Neck
Surg 2004;130:283–90.
12. Costa D, Sanford T, Janney C, et al. Characterization of the nasal septal swell
body. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010;136(11):1107–10.
 Techniques in Septoplasty 9

13. Kridel R, Sturm-O’Brien A. Nasal septum. In: Flint P, editor. Cummings

otolaryngology–head & neck surgery. 6th edition. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saun-
ders; 2015. p. 474–92.
14. Bailey B. Nasal septal surgery 1896–1899: transition and controversy. Laryngo-
scope 1997;107(1):10–6.
15. Adams W. The treatment of the broken nose by forcible straightening and me-
chanical apparatus. BMJ 1875;2:421–2.
16. Metzenbaum M. Replacement of the lower end of the dislocated septal cartilage
versus submucous resection of the dislocated end of the septal cartilage. Arch
Otolaryngol 1929;9:282–92.
17. Peer LA. An operation to repair lateral displacement of the lower border of the
septal cartilage. Arch Otolaryngol 1937;25(4):475–7.
18. Cottle MH, Loring RM. Newer concepts of septum surgery: present status. Eye
Ear Nose Throat Mon 1948;27:403–29.
19. Bhattacharyya N. Ambulatory sinus and nasal surgery in the United States: de-
mographics and perioperative outcomes. Laryngoscope 2010;120(3):635–8.
20. Seth R, Haffey T, McBride JM, et al. Intranasal landmarks for adequate L-strut
preservation during endoscopic septoplasty. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2014;28:265–8.
21. De Sousa A, Inciartef L, Levine H. Powered endoscopic nasal septal surgery.
Acta Med Port 2005;18:249–56.
22. Raynor E. Powered endoscopic septoplasty for septal deviation and isolated
spurs. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2005;7:410–2.
23. Hong CJ, Monteiro E, Badhiwala J, et al. Open versus endoscopic septoplasty
techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2016;
30:436–42.