Entech Control Valve Dynamic Specification

Control Valve Dynamic Specification
(Version 3.0, 11/98)
1.0 Competitive Marketplace

The global market’s continuing demand for quality and 55
uniformity in manufactured products means there is even
greater focus being given to process control equipment and
its performance. EnTech Control Engineering Inc. has
Flow %
53
specialized in the optimization of process performance,
particularly in pulp and paper manufacturing where product
uniformity specifications are now approaching 1%, and
51
product can be rejected when it deviates outside of these
limits. Equally important is the fact that process variability Controller Output %
impacts operating constraints causing lower manufacturing
efficiency and throughput, and thereby reducing the 49
economic potential for the plant. Plant process variability

audits frequently find that product variability is increased by
individual control loops that limit cycle because their control 47
valves are unable to track their controller output signals 0 500 1000
closely enough (Figure 1). This undesirable behaviour of Time seconds
control valves is the biggest single contributor to poor Figure 1 – Typical Control Valve Induced Limit Cycle
control loop performance and the destabilization of
process operation.
Control Valve Dynamic Specification - Purpose

The purpose of the Control Valve Dynamic Specification is to define the degree to which control valves can be nonlinear and still allow
acceptable process control to be achieved in the highly competitive process industry environment. Minimizing the impact of the control
valve on process variability is a key consideration. Intended uses of this specification include: in-process control valve end-use
performance; control valve sizing; purchase requirements; and control valve design, manufacture and maintenance requirements. The
specification has three parts 1) Nonlinear, 2) Dynamic Response, and 3) Valve Sizing. Parts 1) and 2) - nonlinear and dynamic
response, deal with issues such as dead band and speed of response, and are intended for the control valve manufacturer. A given
control valve can be expected to meet one of the categories called out in the first two parts of the specification. The third part – valve
sizing, is intended for the process/instrumentation-engineering designer who is selecting and sizing a control valve for a particular
process application. A given valve selection and process design can be expected to meet one of the categories called out in the third
part of the specification.
About Version 3.0

The original EnTech Control Valve Dynamic Specification was issued in 1992 and was last updated in 1994 (Version 2.1). Although it
targeted performance in pulp and paper processes, it quickly migrated to other industries such as chemicals, hydrocarbons, food
processing and energy where similar problems exist. It has been adopted by valve manufacturers as a performance guideline for
design. More currently it has provided the impetus for the formation of the ISA SP75.25 subcommittee, which is preparing an ISA
standard for small step change performance of control valves. Version 3.0 aligns the language with ISA terminology, considers the end
user’s process control requirements, defines a valve step response performance index, and broadens the applicability to all process
industries where flow regulation affects throughput of quality products. Version 3.0 replaces all previous versions. Sections 1, 2 & 3
give background, Section 4 is the specification, and Section 5 gives testing methods. Note: italicized words are defined in Section 6.0
at the end of the document.
Copyright EnTech 1998 – All Rights Reserved

Control Valve System
The Specification considers the control valve as a dynamic system, from input signal through to the flow coefficient that determines the
fluid flow in the pipe. The control valve system includes the actuator, drive train, positioner and valve, under normal process operating
conditions. The key to determining performance is that there is a measured change in a process variable in response to small input
step-changes (1% and less). This indicates that the valve flow coefficient has actually changed in the pipe. Valve stem movement
is not an adequate indication, especially for rotary valves, and may even be in error for sliding stem valves if there is instability in the
fluid passing through the valve body. However, valve stem indication, is considered to be a good measure of control valve system
speed of response for step changes large enough to cause valve motion. (In the text the words valve and control valve are used to
mean control valve system where ambiguity is avoided).
2.0 Control Problem Definition

Most control valves are used as final control elements in feedback control loops with PID control algorithms. The dynamic response of
the control valve system is inherently nonlinear in a complex way and has the potential to create the following problems for the control
loop:
1. For very small input signal changes, valve nonlinearities and variable dead time cause limit cycles. Figure 1 displays a typical limit
cycle where the tendency of the valve to stick or delay forces the controller to continue correcting for the error from setpoint. Once
a limit cycle occurs, effective control is lost and unwanted process variability is created.
2. The speed of response of the control valve system must be sufficiently fast to allow the desired control loop speed of response
to be achieved.
3. The control valve system response often introduces dead time into the loop, which can vary with the magnitude of the valve input
signal. Dead time is extremely destabilizing for a control loop. Variable dead time even more so.
4. For larger input changes valve nonlinearities cause the valve dynamic response to be inconsistent, making it difficult or
impossible to tune the controller for consistent performance. For effective control the control valve system must deliver a
consistent dynamic response over a specified range of step sizes.
Linear Control
Most feedback controllers are essentially linear. If all elements of a control loop were also linear, there would be far fewer control
problems. What does 'linear' mean in the control context? A linear dynamic system responds to its input signal with the same dynamic
response (same gain, time constants, dead time etc.) regardless of the size of the change in the input signal. Due to their mechanical
nature control valve systems are highly nonlinear, and this is a major source of problems for control loop performance.
Ideal Control Valve System Step Response

Ideally, a control valve system should respond to a step change in a fashion which allows the control loop the greatest possible chance
of controlling the process effectively without inadvertently generating additional variability. This ideal step response would be much like
a first order response and would rise monotonically to its final value. It would have a time constant and a T86 suitably fast to satisfy
the control loop speed of response needed for the process application. It would reach steady state at a time Tss that would be equal
to five time constants or 2.5 times T86. It would have zero dead time, no ringing or hunting, zero overshoot, and a travel gain of
1.0. Such a response would appear to be essentially linear to the control loop. It would be free of all characteristics that could
potentially generate variability though overshoot, hunting and dead time.
2.1 Speed of Response

The speed of response of a control valve system can be gauged by its approximate time constant τ ' . The speed of response of a
control loop is usually determined by the desired closed loop time constant, often referred to as Lambda ( λ ), which should be selected
to allow the process manufacturing objectives to be met. In order to ensure control loop stability and robustness margins consistent
with low process variability operation, the speed of response (time constant) of all of the internal dynamic elements in the control loop
including the process (non-integrating), the transmitter and the control valve system, should be at least five times faster than that of the
control loop. In some cases the control valve system is the slowest or dominant dynamic in the control loop, and as a result, it
determines how the loop can be tuned. It is this limiting case that forms the argument for the relationship between the control loop
expected speed of response and the control valve system speed of response slow limit in this specification. Unfortunately because of
their nonlinear nature, control valve systems have a variable speed of response. When the valve is slower than an expected speed of
response, it can destabilize the control loop and cause oscillations to occur. On the other hand when the valve is faster than this
expected speed of response, this seldom has a harmful effect. Hence a control valve system with a speed of response no slower than a
certain slow limit is capable of being used successfully in any control loop, as long as the speed of response limit of the control valve
system is at least five or more times faster than the intended speed of response of the control loop.

Perhaps 80% of flow and pressure control loops in most industrial plants can be tuned for a speed of response range from 5 seconds to
one minute. This range is determined by the typical dynamics of many existing control valves, transmitters and distributed control
systems. These loops would all work satisfactorily if their control valves had an effective time constant of 1 second. In some cases
however it is critically important to achieve a faster speed of response, such as a hydraulic header pressure control loop which may
need a speed of response as fast as one second, and hence a minimum control valve speed of response of 0.2 seconds. At the other
end of the scale, many flow and pressure loops are tuned for 10 seconds and slower, while other variables including many temperature
and tank level controllers are often tuned as slow one minute or even one hour. To satisfy a control loop speed of response of one
minute requires a minimum control
valve speed of response of 12 Table I - Control Valve Speed of response Classes
seconds. Based on this, four Control Loop Speed of response λ Control Valve Maximum Time constant τ '
classes of control valve speed of Very Fast (1 second) 0.2 seconds
response can be defined, and are Fast (5 seconds) 1 seconds
shown in Table I: Nominal (10 seconds) 2 seconds
Slow (1 minute) 12 seconds
2.2 Measuring the Control
Valve Dynamic Response
The control valve system is expected to produce consistent dynamic responses over a certain range of input signal step sizes. The
speed of response of the valve system can be measured via the stem or shaft position, and requires a transducer to be mounted on the
valve. This must be calibrated to agree
with the input signal, and must have a
measurement time constant at least 20
times faster than the valve (T86). A typical 39
Initial Overshoot to 38.11 = 23 %
step response is shown in Figure 2. The Final Steady State Average Values
Stem
response often has dead time (Td) which Input = 37.84, Stem = 37.65
Input
may vary considerably. Prior to analyzing 38
the dynamic response the initial and final
Stem %
values should be established for both the

input signal and the stem position. For the
37
input signal and stem position the initial Travel gain = 0.91, Tss = 18.3 sec
Input,
and final values should be averaged over

the initial and final steady state periods of
the response. The measurement of T86, 36 86.5% of response, T86 = 2.06 sec
the time at which the response crosses Dead time Td = 1.6 sec
86.5% of the step change, captures the Initial Steady State Average Values, Input & Stem = 35.67
majority of the total dynamic response 35
including the dead time. The amount of 0 10 20 30
dead time is of interest and should be
Time - Seconds
recorded. To avoid ambiguity, dead time
can be measured as the time after the step Figure 2 – Step Change Speed of Response
change where the response crosses 10% Note: T86, Initial Overshoot, Travel Gain, Tss
of the full value of the response. After T86,
the settling behaviour becomes of interest. The response may or may not overshoot. It may ring or hunt by overshooting and
undershooting several times. The rate of change may slow down considerably as it approaches steady state. It may or may not reach
the right steady state value. The initial overshoot is the point where the stem position reaches its maximum value after the step change
(in either the up or down direction). The % overshoot is calculated as the amount over the steady state value expressed as a
percentage of the change in steady state value of the stem position (the term overshoot applies to both increasing and decreasing steps
as in Figure 6). The % undershoot (not present in Figure 2 – see Figure 6 which overshoots, undershoots and overshoots) is
calculated as the amount under the steady state value expressed as a percentage of the change in steady state value of the stem
position. Overshoots and undershoots over 1% should be measured and counted. The travel gain is calculated by dividing the change
in steady state value of the stem position by the change in input signal. Ideally, the travel gain should have a value of 1.0. The time at
steady state (Tss) is the point where the stem position reaches within plus and minus 1% of the steady state value.
2.3 Tss as a Function of T86

A linear first order system reaches steady state in four to five time constants. In four time constants the step response has reached
98.2% of its final value, while in five time constants it has reached 99.3% of the final value. Ideally, the settling behaviour of the valve
response should be as close to linear as possible, hence the Tss upper limit should be no longer than 2.5 times T86. A slower settling
3

time will also tend to de-stabilize the control loop. Hence in order to have a speed of response which is fast enough for a givem control
loop desired speed of response, the control valve system should have both T86 and Tss values which are equal to or faster than their
respective specification limits.
2.4 T86, Dead time and Control Performance

Whereas T86 is a convenient
way of capturing the valve Input
38
step response time, it is
important to recognize the T86 = 2.8 sec
consequences of various
86.5%
valve response dynamics with 37.5
of step
the same T86. Figure 3
#1
shows three idealized valve 1st Order
Input, Stem %
step responses all with the 37 TC = 1.4 sec

same T86 of 2.8 seconds.
#2
Response #1 is an ideal first
Slew
order response with a time 36.5 Slew time = 3.3
constant of 1.4 seconds. sec
Such a response, if it were #3
possible, would be ideal for a Td + 1st Order
36
valve and would allow the Td = 2.4 sec
loop to be tuned for a Closed TC = 0.2 sec
Loop Time Constant ( λ ) of 7
35.5
seconds, which is five times
slower than the time constant 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Time seconds
of the valve. (In fact because
of its ideal nature it would be Figure 3 T86 for Various Responses
safe to tune it even faster).
Response #2 is more typical of an electric valve driven by a fixed speed motor. The response reaches steady state in 3.3 seconds for
this step change. The dead time is zero, and the response is roughly equivalent to a first order time constant of 1 second. Hence the
loop could be tuned for a closed loop time constant of 5 seconds. Response #3 is much more typical of a pneumatic control valve, and
includes 2.4 seconds of dead time. Dead time is the most destabilizing dynamic parameter for a control loop. The T86 of 2.8 seconds
is 86% dead time. Dead time in a control loop causes resonance to occur, in which the loop has a tendency to cycle at its natural
frequency and amplify process variability. The frequency of the cycle is determined by the amount of dead time and the closed loop
time constant. The amount of resonance or
amplification can be expressed in dB’s, Table II – Loop Resonance as a Function of λ and Td
amplitude ratio or as a percentage. It Closed Loop TC λ Resonance Period of Oscillation
expresses how much bigger the variability % dB
that already exists in the process at the 2 x Td 35% +2.6 6.0 x Td
natural frequency would be as a result of the 3 x Td 26% +2.0 6.6 x Td
loop’s control action. The faster the tuning, 4 x Td 19% +1.5 6.9 x Td
the stronger this tendency. Table II 5 x Td 16% +1.3 7.2 x Td
quantifies the relationship. Based on this
result it is advisable to limit the Closed Loop Time Constant ( λ ) to 4 x Td, in order to limit the resonance to less than 20%. For the
example of Figure 3, Response #3, since T86 is mainly dead time it is advisable to limit the tuning to 11 seconds (4 x T86). A simple
rule can be generated from these three results as summarized in Table III. Put
in other words, all T86’s are not equal. A control loop can achieve effective Table III - λ as a Function of T86 and Td
process control as long as the control valve speed of response is at least five Td/ T86 Ratio λ (minimum)
times faster than that of the control loop. As T86 is twice τ ' , it means that Low (<0.5) 2.5 x T86
T86 for the control valve should be 2.5, or more, times faster than the fastest High (>0.5) 4 x T86
λ planned for the control loop, as long as the Td / T86 ratio is not high. If it
the ratio is high, then T86 should be faster still by a factor of 2.5 / 4 or 62.5% in order to handle the additional dead time. This allows
Table I to be restated in terms of the above discussion as shown in Table IV below:

Table IV - Control Valve Speed of response Classes
Control Loop Speed of response λ Control Valve T86 Control Valve T86
Td / T86 < 0.5 Td / T86 > 0.5
1 second 0.4 seconds 0.25 seconds
5 seconds 2 seconds 1.25 seconds
10 seconds 4 seconds 2.5 seconds
1 minute 24 seconds 15 seconds
3.0 Control Valve Nonlinearities

Control valve systems have nonlinear behaviour that can be categorized as follows:
1. control valve tracking nonlinearities,

2. flow characteristic nonlinearities.
3.1 Control Valve Tracking Nonlinearities

Control valve tracking nonlinearities represent the inability of the control valve system (valve, actuator, and positioner) to faithfully track
changes in the input signal, and to ensure that changes in flow coefficient actually occur as a result. Tracking nonlinearities consist of
dead band and step resolution, which combine in a complex way to produce total hysteresis. This determines the degree to which the
valve closure member (trim, plug, etc.) fails to track step changes in the input signal. Ideally, the valve system should track input
changes with a travel gain of 1.0. However, due to the mechanical nature of the valve system (clearances, flexibility, and static friction,
dynamic friction), it stands to reason that it is impossible to execute very small step changes uniformly. This specification is intended to
quantify the valve behaviour for step changes that approach the ultimate limit of movement.
3.1.1 Nonlinear Regions

Tracking nonlinearities are caused by problems in the positioner/actuator/drive train part of the control valve system and prevent the
valve closure member from following the input signal in a linear and repeatable fashion. For a pneumatically actuated control valve,
there are four regions of nonlinear operation (referred to as Regions A, B, C and D). For a very small input signal step change (say
0.1%), the closure member does not move at all (Region A – less than dead band or step resolution) in a reasonable time after the step
change. Above some initial threshold (say 0.1% to 1%), motion occurs (Region B), but due to the nonlinearities and other effects the
responses are not consistent. For larger step changes the closure member moves in a more consistent manner, and it is possible to
classify responses in this region (Region C) such that their step response times (T86) all fall below the acceptable limit which is required
for effective control. For step changes which are larger still (Region D), it is likely that the motion of the control valve system will
become velocity limited (steps of say 10% and greater), hence causing the step response times (T86) to become progressively longer.
The control valve system transitions continuously through Regions A, B, and C as the control loop regulates the process. Under normal
process regulation it will transition though Regions A, B and will penetrate slightly into Region C, as most of the control moves made by
a controller are small under normal process regulation. The controller must transition through Region A, as here the loop is essentially
open due to the fact that the control valve system does not respond. The controller will also transition through Region B as here the
responses are inconsistent and may have very long dead times. Only once the controller output transitions into Region C can it be
expected that the control valve system will respond reliably enough for feedback control to work. For this reason it is expected that the
controller output will have frequent but shallow penetrations into Region C. Only for major setpoint changes or very large process
disturbances will the control valve transition through Region C and into Region D. As a process disturbance occurs, the control loop
takes corrective action. Initially, this action tends to be small (inside Region A). However, because the control valve system will not
respond to these small changes, the controller will “wind-up” and produce larger control actions which eventually reach Region B. Here
the control valve moves but not consistently. Sometimes small step changes result in a long dead time before the valve actually moves,
again causing the controller to “wind-up”. When the valve does finally move after the dead time, it is trying to match an input signal
(controller output) which actually exceeds the value needed to have the process variable achieve setpoint. It is this that causes the limit
cycle to occur. This variable dead time phenomenon produces a region of local instability where the dead time is far too long for the
existing controller tuning. The variable dead time phenomenon is a very common mechanism for inducing control valve limit cycles.
The amplitude of such limit cycles is a complex function of the nonlinearities causing Region A, as well as the variable dead time of
Region B. An important point is that the behaviour of the control valve system just inside Region C is key to determining the
effectiveness of a control loop under the condition of normal regulation (some 98% of the time). The actual degree of penetration into
Region C is a function of process gain, the controller tuning and the amount of noise present in the control loop.
For large setpoint changes or major process disturbances, the controller will make larger changes (Region C) in the valve input signal.
The valve responds to each of these changes relatively quickly and with reasonable consistency. As long as the valve response is fast
5

enough for the controller tuning that has been installed, the loop response will be as anticipated by the controller and effective control
will be established. Should the valve be faster than expected, this will not generally upset the controller. When even larger control
corrections are needed, the control valve may become velocity limited (Region D) and take progressively longer to complete larger
changes. This will appear to the controller as if the process has a slower time constant than anticipated, with the result that the control
loop will tend to oscillate and cause increased variability.
Hydraulically actuated control valves have a similar behaviour to that described above, except that Regions A and B will likely be
much narrower than for a pneumatic valve.
Electrically actuated valves using fixed speed electric motors usually have a narrow dead band that applies for small step changes.
Here the motor is turned off. This dead band determines Region A. Depending on the electric motor increase/decrease control logic,
there may not be a Region B. Beyond this point, electric valves are velocity limited for steps of all sizes as they move at a fixed speed.
As long as the step response time T86 is less than a user-specified limit this defines an acceptable Region C. The point at which T86
exceeds the high limit defines the start of Region D.
User Selection of Minimum and Maximum Step Sizes

The specification requires the valve user to specify the desired minimum and maximum step sizes that are to apply in Region C. These
limits determine the range of controller output step sizes over which the control valve system dynamic response should consistently
conform to the dynamic response specification limits (T86, overshoot, travel gain and Tss) and will allow the control loop to operate in a
near linear fashion as a result. Also, the test procedure identifies what the actual minimum step size is at which T86 (and other
parameters) actually meet the specification limits. This point is the upper limit of Region B and the lower limit of Region C. Clearly, the
minimum step size is the most important as it determines the limits of effective control, as well as the amplitude of a potential limit
cycle. Under normal conditions of regulatory control, the controller output transitions through Regions A and B and far enough into
Region C to cause the control valve system to respond and allow feedback control to occur. The amount of penetration into Region C
varies inversely with process gain, and directly with controller gains and process noise. If the process gain is high, the tuning fast and
the process noise substantial, the controller output will continually be making changes that are large enough to be inside Region C all
the time. In this case there will be no limit cycle and the control valve system will not impact control performance in any adverse way.
The minimum step size determines where the lower limit of Region C should occur. It in turn depends on the size of the valve
nonlinearities (dead band, step resolution, total hysteresis) in Region A, as well as the size of Region B. If the user wants to have a
tighter minimum step size, this determines Region B. In turn it also requires tighter limits to be set for the nonlinear parameters in
Region A. Roughly a factor of two can be applied to the total hysteresis (Region A) in order to estimate a feasible value for the
minimum step size, although this is clearly very dependent on the design of the valve system. Alternatively, the total hysteresis must be
smaller than the specified minimum step size, and a factor of one half can be used to estimate a reasonable total hysteresis limit from
the minimum step size.
Selection of the maximum step size is far less important for regulatory control. The maximum step size determines the ability of the
control loop to handle large changes with consistent dynamics as well as small ones. Large step changes occur only at certain times,
such as when the control loop is responding to major setpoint changes, large disturbances or some form of sequence such as process
start-up, shutdown or product transition. In-process testing will not normally allow step sizes larger than some practical limit, such as
10%, to be applied under process operating conditions. Hence, under these conditions it is only possible to imply conformance for large
step changes by extrapolation. For instance, if T86 as measured, is well below the specification limit and is decreasing as step changes
increase (see Figure 4), then it is likely that it will also meet specification for 10% and possibly even for 50% changes.
This concept is illustrated in Figure 4, which shows how the step response time T86 might vary with step size for a given pneumatic
valve. For very small step sizes, T86 is expected to be very long. In fact in Region A where no motion occurs, T86 is infinitely long. In
Region B, it is expected that small step changes will cause ever longer dead times. As the step size becomes larger, T86 is expected
to become much smaller. Then as the step size becomes larger still, T86 is expected to become progressively larger as the valve
system becomes velocity limited. In the example of Figure 4, the user specified parameters are consistent with the default values for
minimum and maximum step size (2% and 10%), as well a control loop speed of response ( λ ) of 10 seconds, which calls for
“consistent movement” as follows:
1. T86 less than 4 seconds for step sizes ranging from 2.0% to 10%. Since in Figure 4 the T86 vs. step size curve crosses 4 seconds
at a step sizes of 1.4% and 15.9%, this requirement is far exceeded.
2. A travel gain of 1.0 +/- 0.2 for all of the step changes specified in 1. above.
3. An overshoot of less than 20% for all of the step changes specified in 1. above.

14 User Min Step Size User Max Step Size
= 2.0 % = 10 %
12
Region C Region D
User Specification Velocity
10
Actual - based on tests Limit
Consistent Movement
T86 seconds
8 T86 < 4 sec

0.8 < Travel Gain < 1.2
6 Overshoot < 20%
Minimum step size found by test
4
T86 Max Spec = 4 seconds
2
T86 vs. Step Size
Test Results
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
Step Size %
Figure 4 – Region C – Consistent Responses
Figure 4 also illustrates how the user specification of minimum and maximum step sizes may differ with the actual performance of the
control valve system. Clearly the example of Figure 4 exceeds the minimum and maximum step size specifications, which for
illustration use the specification default values of 2% and 10%. The example valve actually conforms to 1.4% and 15.9%. The Actual
minimum step size is the boundary between Regions B and C. This value is the real measure of the control valve system nonlinear
performance and is measured during the testing.
Figure 4 illustrates the expected results for a typical pneumatic valve only. Other results are also possible. A fixed speed electrically
actuated valve is expected to have a fixed dead band when due to the fact that the motor must be deactivated when the valve is at rest.
When the valve is moving it will do so at fixed speed. This translates into a characteristic that would parallel the Region A demarcation
line in Figure 4 to a minimum T86 value for the smallest step change the valve can execute. From this point there would be a line of
rising T86 with step size, which would cross the T86 limit at a T86 value which would be the demarcation between Regions C and D.
The pneumatic valve illustration in Figure 4 assumes that control valve systems have the tendency to have longer T86 values as the
step size becomes smaller at the bottom of Region C. The specification recognizes only four control loop speed of response classes (1,
5, 10 and 60 seconds) with eight T86 limits (0.25, 0.4, 1.25, 2, 2.5, 4, 15, 24) which in turn are a function of dead time. These limits
have been designed to handle typical pneumatic valve characteristics. As control valve system designs continue to improve, this may
no longer be the case. In an ideal design, as soon as the valve starts to move for the smallest step size possible (Region A upper limit),
it will do so at a T86 which is well below the T86 limit for the speed of response class. In this case the testing methods should record
the longest T86 observed, as this is a real measure of the true performance of the control valve system.
3.1.2 Control Valve System Step Response Performance Index - Weighting Factor W

The specification sets out various limits for speed of response T86, Tss, % overshoot and travel gain which apply to Region C. Two
control valve systems can meet the specification limits yet differ in their relative step response performance, hence it is important to
provide a means of measuring these differences. For instance a valve with a 19% overshoot and one with a 0% overshoot both pass the
specification overshoot limit of 20%, yet clearly the performance of the second valve is better than the first. A control valve system step
response performance index has been designed. This consists of a system weighting factors that weight the deviations of each step
response from the ideal first order response in various ways. The performance index is designed to measure the performance of the
control valve system under normal regulatory conditions. As a result the weighting factors are applied only over a very narrow range of
step sizes from the minimum step size to double the minimum step size, as this is where the control valve system is expected to
operate most of the time. The absolute value of the minimum step size is also factored into the index. Weighting factors are applied to
four phenomena are listed in Table V below.
Table V – Weighting Factors – Step Sizes ranging from Minimum to 2 x Minimum

Phenomenon Most Desirable Specification Limit Typical Weighting W at Limit
Value
Td/T86 Ratio 0 1.0 30
Tss/T86 2.5 expect 5 and more 20
Overshoots & Undershoots 0% 20% 30
Travel Gain 1.0 0.8 – 1.2 20
Combined 0 All limits Approx. 100
The performance index is calculated using Equation 1) below, which combines weighting factors based on T86:
W(T86) = (Td/T86) x 30 + Abs(Tss/T86 – 2.5) x 8

+ (sum of overshoots and undershoots (%)) x (min. step size %) x 0.75
+ Abs(1 – travel gain) x 50) x (min. step size %) …….1)
Example: Td=2, T86=3, Tss=12, 1st O/S=12%, other overshoots, undershoots = 0, Travel gain = 0.9, minimum step size = 2%. For
these statistics W(T86) = 0.67 x 30 + (4 -2.5) x 8 + 12 x 1 x 2 + 0.1 x 2 x 50 = 66
The weighting factors have been designed to produce a valve performance index of approximately 100, for a control valve system which
just passes the specification at the default minimum step size of 2%, with all undesirable values at or near the specification limits, or
other large excursions as outlined in Table V. The first two terms in the performance index relate to speed of response. The second
two terms relate to travel. The last two terms have been weighted by the absolute value of the minimum step size. In this way a valve
which meets a minimum step size of 0.5% is much better than one with a 2% minimum step size. The minimum step size value has
two meanings. Prior to testing only the specification limit is known. After testing is complete, the actual value (Upper limit of Region B)
should be known. If available, the actual value is to be used in Equation 1) and 2), otherwise the specification limit value is to be used.
The use of the step size as part of the weighting factor on overshoot produces a much lighter penalty for a 0.5% minimum step size
than for 2%, and a better valve performance rating as a result. More serious problems, such as dead time and overshoot have been
given a relative weight of 30 points each at their maximum values and 2% minimum step size. Less serious problems, such as Tss and
travel gain have a weighting of 20 points each at their high or maximum allowed values and 2% minimum step size. Overshoot is
further weighted by the sum of the % overshoots and % undershoots, as this indicates a stronger tendency to oscillate and to create
process variability.
The performance of a given control valve system can also be judged based on its intended use in a control loop of given closed loop
time constant, Lambda. If a control valve with a T86 of 3 seconds, a relatively high Td/T86 ratio and a relatively slow Tss is to be used
in a control loop with a one minute Lambda value, clearly, the relative importance of the Td and Tss weights is not very high (the
Lambda values which should be used for this purpose are: 1, 5, 10 and 60 seconds and correspond to the speed of response classes in
the specification). These factors are taken into account Equation 2 below, which weights the time-based penalties on the basis of the
control loop Lambda value, as opposed to T86:
W(Lambda) = ((Td/T86) x 30 + Abs(Tss/T86 – 2.5) x8) x (T86 x 2.5 / Lambda)

+ (sum of overshoots and undershoots (%)) x (min. step size %) x 0.75
+ Abs(1 – travel gain) x 100) x (min. step size %) …….2)
Example: using the example given above for Lambda = 60 seconds, W(Lambda) = 38, whereas W(T86) = 66

The total score is the sum of both time response and overshoot/gain scores. Example scores for the responses of Figures 2, 3 and 6 for
a minimum step size of 2% are given in Table VI below for illustration:
Table VI – Weighting Factors for Figure 2, 3 and 6 Example Responses

Figure 2 Fig 3, Resp # 1 Fig 3, Resp # 2 Fig 3, Resp # 3 Figure 6
Ideal 1st Order Electric Drive Pneumatic
Td 1.6 0 0 2.4 2
T86 2.06 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.5
Tss 18.3 7 3.3 3.8 70
Overshoots & Undershoots 23 % 0% 0% 0% 16%+5%+4%
Travel Gain 0.91 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
W(T86) 118 = v poor 0 = perfect 11 = excellent 35 = vg 265 = v bad
W(Lambda=10) 82 = poor 0 = perfect 7= excellent 24 = vg 180 = bad
The response of Figure 2 has relatively high dead time, a large overshoot, and a long settling time. The resulting score of 118 is very
poor and is indicative of these problems. If this valve is to be used in a control loop with a Lambda value of 10 seconds, the score is
slightly improved (poor), as the dead time and settling time contributions are not as vital. In Figure 3, Response #1 is an ideal first order
response and has a perfect score of zero. Response #2 is typical of an electric valve. It has zero dead time, and no overshoot. Its
settling time is surprisingly short as compared to the ideal value of 2.5 times T86. Its score excellent (very and close to zero).
Response #3 is typical of a pneumatic valve, and has a high dead time ratio, but no overshoot. The score is quite low (35) signifying a
very good performance, but not as good as Response #2. Figure 6 shows a response with a modest initial overshoot (16%), which is
followed by an undershoot of 5% and an overshoot of 4%. This is represents excessive ringing and also has an extremely long settling
time. The resulting score is very high signifying a very unsatisfactory (very bad) result.
3.2 Flow Characteristic Nonlinearities

Valve selection and valve sizing is generally carried out by an engineering design firm during the engineering phase of a capital project.
It is also carried out by plant staff when re-sizing, replacing or re-selecting a control valve. The control valve system that is selected will
determine the fineness of the control capability (total hysteresis, minimum step size, Region C, etc.) as well as the valve characteristics.
The size of the valve will determine the installed valve flow coefficient, flow gain, and range of process gain. The
process/instrumentation designer making these two decisions determines: the capability of this control valve to be used for effective
control; the amplitude of the potential limit cycle; and the degree of difficulty of tuning the resulting control loop. In turn these decisions
will determine how effective the control loop will be and how much unwanted process variability it will potentially create. This section of
the specification is devoted to helping the process/instrumentation designer to make informed decisions regarding both selections with a
view of minimizing the impact on process variability.
Every control valve has a fluid flowing through it, hence a flow value can be determined under given process conditions. During the
project design phase the sizing of flow streams is carried out, and the design drawings and flow sheets typically show the minimum,
nominal and maximum expected flow figures for the process design. The process designer has access to these figures. The fluid flow
may or may not be measured by the final process instrumentation. Instead, the instrumentation may measure pH, tank level, or
temperature. Nonetheless, the performance of the control valve selected for the application will determine the step resolution of the
control valve system, while the valve sizing will determine the flow gain, which in turn will determine the flow resolution. This will be the
case even if the flow is not measured. The installed flow gain, together with the process characteristics and transmitter span will result
in the “installed process gain characteristic” for the control loop. In turn this determines:
1. The effective flow gain (Kf) of the control valve, which together with the minimum step size, determine the minimum expected
amplitude of the potential flow limit cycle. The minimum step size is a function of the valve system selection, while the flow gain
at the operating point is a function of the valve sizing and piping design. The amplitude of the limit cycle determines the process
variability that the control valve is capable of generating. The worst case on a percentage basis occurs at the minimum design
flow value.
2. The flow gain (Kf) together with the span of the transmitter impact the control loop process gain (Kp), which in turn determines the
rangeability of the loop,
3. The degree to which the flow gain varies over the operating range of the process determines the degree of difficulty of tuning the
control loop over the operating range of the process.
The flow gain for the control valve measures the ratio of flow change to input signal change for an input signal step change. It is
determined by the flow coefficient for the valve, the fluid characteristics, the upstream and downstream pressures, and the shape and
9

slope of the installed control valve characteristic, which is typically nonlinear. However the degree to which the installed valve
characteristic changes is determined by the chosen characteristic for the valve (equal percentage, linear, quick opening etc.) and the
relative pressure drops across the valve and the rest of the fluid transport system. Ideally an installed control loop process gain of 1.0 is
desirable for a self regulating process, as this allows for full valve travel over the full span of the transmitter. However, in many cases
valves are severely oversized in the quest for additional operating flexibility. This results in control valves with very high process gains,
which are nearly closed during normal operation. The effective operating range for these control valves is hence very narrow. The step
resolution now becomes a significant fraction of this range, which magnifies the valve tracking nonlinearities making good control
impossible. Also a large limit cycle usually results.
3.2.1 Flow Resolution and Process

Resolution 55
The ability of the fluid flowing through the valve
and the process variable to track changes in 53.61
controller output signal, or valve input signal, can
Flow %
53
be defined respectively as the flow resolution and 52.61
the process resolution. Flow resolution applies
to all valves even if the flow is not measured, as all 51.61
valves have a fluid flowing through them. Flow 51
Controller Output %
resolution can be calculated based on the step 50.13
resolution and the flow gain. Process resolution
applies to all control loops based on the actual
49
measurement that is made. If the process
measurement happens to be flow, then the flow
resolution and the process resolution are the same
thing. Flow resolution is the product of valve step 47
47.75
resolution and flow gain (Kf), while the process 0 500 1000
resolution is the product of the step resolution and Time seconds
process gain (Kp). Given a certain step resolution,
the lower the flow gain and process gain, the lower Figure 5 - Limit cycle Amplitude
the flow resolution and process resolution become.
Hence, to some extent a high step resolution can
be compensated for by a low process gain.
3.2.2 Limit Cycle Amplitude – Process Variable

It is difficult to predict the exact amplitude of a limit cycle in either the fluid flow or the process variable that results from valve
nonlinearities. The amplitude is a complex function of the dead band, step resolution, total hysteresis and variable dead time that apply
inside Regions A and B. A safe estimate however is that the controller output limit cycle peak-to-peak excursion is unlikely to be
smaller than the minimum step size, or the upper limit of Region B. Hence, the amplitude (one half of peak-to-peak) of the flow limit
cycle can be predicted as at least one half of the minimum step size times the flow gain, while that of the process variable is at least
one half of the minimum step size times the process gain. The amplitude of the flow limit cycle is very important as it determines the
degree to which the control valve will impact process variability. The flow limit cycle amplitude can be expressed as a percentage of the
mean flow at the operating point. The worst case occurs at the minimum design flow.
This can be illustrated by referring to Figure 5, which is a repeat of Figure 1. The flow signal oscillates from approximately 53.61%
down to 51.61% of span. The peak-to-peak of the flow limit cycle is about 2% of span, while the amplitude is about 1% of span. The
mean value is 52.61% of span. Hence the amplitude of the flow limit cycle is 1.9% of mean value (1% x 100% / 52.61%). This
value represents the de-stabilizing potential on process variability of this control valve selection, sizing and flow. The
controller output is cycling from approximately 50.13% down to 47.75%. The cycle appears to be a triangular wave caused by the
controller integral action ramping the controller output as long as the valve is stuck, or is slow to respond due to a long dead time.
Hence, it is likely that the actual valve stem position is switching at the instants that the controller output reaches its furthest excursion,
and at approximately the same values. The peak-to-peak of the controller output limit cycle is about 2.38%, and is a good estimate of
the minimum step size and Region B. It is not possible to estimate the size of the nonlinearities of Region A from this number, except
that the total hysteresis is less than this value. The process gain Kp has the value 0.84 (2% / 2.38%).
10

3.3 Varying Process Gain & Controller Tuning
Flow characteristic nonlinearities are a function of valve closure member characteristics and the pressure drop distribution between the
control valve and the rest of the process piping, pumps and other equipment. These nonlinearities cause the control loop process
gain to vary with the operating point and this further complicates the control loop tuning and performance problem, since a
fixed gain controller cannot cope well with these changes. Ideally, the valve characteristics and sizing should be chosen to minimize
how much the process gain varies over the operating range. Ideally the process gain should not change by more than a factor of two,
for good control, as reasonable tuning can usually absorb this factor. As a last resort, the variation in process gain can be compensated
for through nonlinear compensation techniques in the controller, or positioner. Although this is possible it is seldom very robust.
3.4 Documentation – Specification Sheet

At time of purchase the expected performance of a control valve system should be documented in a specification sheet, for control valve
systems or “valve packages” assembled by a valve manufacturer or supplier. When a user assembles a control valve system from
components (control valves, actuators, positioners), the user should attempt to document the performance based on in-process tests,
after the valve system has been placed in service. The actual performance of a control valve system, as installed, should be
documented in a specification sheet. The parameters called out in this specification should be reported.
3.5 User Selection of Specification Parameters

The specification has been written taking into account the majority of process applications. Nevertheless control valve system
applications outside of the anticipated performance will occur, and it is up to the user to determine appropriate performance
requirements. Each part of the specification contains an extra space for the user for this reason. Users are encouraged to make
informed decisions on the basis of the principles outlined in this document.
3.6 Applicability
The specification applies to control valves. It does not apply to on/off, hand, solenoid, blocking or switching valves.
3.7 Passing the Specification – Responsibility and Dependency on Instrumentation

The specification contains three parts: Nonlinear, Dynamic Response and Valve Sizing. The first two parts apply to the performance of
a particular control valve system design and it is the responsibility of a control valve system vendor to pass these requirements. The
third part – valve sizing – applies to the suitability of a particular control valve system for use in a specific process control application,
and it is the responsibility of process/instrumentation designer making these design selections to conform with the specification.
Three signals are needed to test the control valve system in-process: the valve input or controller output signal, the process
measurement (PV) and the stem or shaft position. The PV signal is needed to test the Nonlinear and Valve Sizing part of the
specification, while the stem or shaft position is needed to test the Dynamic Response part of the specification. Should these signals be
unavailable, or should suitable testing equipment be unavailable then testing cannot be carried out. Although the PV is always
available, it is not always suitable for testing purposes (integrating process variables, or very slow measurements are not suitable). A
stem or shaft transducer is needed to test against the Dynamic Step Response part of the specification. In most cases this can be fitted
to the control valve system as a temporary installation, providing plant safety regulations allow. A stem transducer could be installed as
a permanent installation in such cases.
The stem transducer signal and the valve input signal must be sampled at a rate that is at least twenty times faster than T86 for the
control valve system. For the four control loop speed of response classes the corresponding sampling rates are: 12 msec, 62 msec, 125
msec and 0.75 sec. These sampling rates are faster those for a typical DCS system and require a high-speed data collection system to
be used for this purpose.
11

4.0 SPECIFICATION
The Control Valve Dynamic Specification is organized in three sections: Nonlinear, Dynamic Step Response and Valve Sizing. Each
category has a number of recommendations, a default value, and an extra space is provided for a user-specified selection. If no
control loop application knowledge is available, the default values should be used. The performance of a control valve system
shipped as a package should be documented in a specification sheet, including the parameters called out in this specification.
(Footnotes for references in the tables appear on the next page).
4.1 NONLINEAR SPECIFICATION – (Responsibility - Control Valve System Vendor)

The nonlinear specification sets the maximum allowed dead band, step resolution and total hysteresis. The total hysteresis influences
the potential minimum step size, which in turn determines the amplitude of the potential controller output limit cycle. The minimum step
size together with the flow gain determine the amplitude of the potential PV limit cycle. Three classes are given: nominal, fine and very
fine. Default values are provided for both rotary valves and sliding stem valves.
Valve Tracking Nonlinearities (% input signal) DEFAULT DEFAULT

Class Nominal - 1% Fine - 0.5% V Fine – 0.1% Rotary Valves Sliding Stem User
Dead Band (%) 0.6 1 0.3 0.06 0.6 0.3
Step Resolution (%) 0.4 1 0.2 0.04 0.4 0.2
Total Hysteresis (%) 1.0 1 0.5 0.1 1.0 0.5
4.2 DYNAMIC STEP RESPONSE SPECIFICATION – (Responsibility - Control Valve System Vendor)
STEP SIZE RANGE
The dynamic response specification sets the ranges over which consistent dynamics are to be achieved (Region C)
The step size range is set from minimum to maximum. Minimum step size depends on the total hysteresis, and the magnitude of
Region B. It is valve design dependent and is likely to be about double the total hysteresis. Values are given for nominal, fine, and very
fine. The finer, the more capable the valve design. Default values are given for rotary and sliding stem valves.
Minimum Step Size (%) DEFAULT DEFAULT

Nominal Fine Very Fine Rotary Valves Sliding Stem User
2.0 1 1.0 0.2 2.0 1.0
The Maximum step size determines the upper range over which the valve is nearly linear and depends on the size of Region D. Values
are given for nominal, wide and very wide. The wider, the more capable the valve design.
Maximum Step Size (%) 7

Nominal Wide Very Wide DEFAULT User
10 50 100 10
STEP RESPONSE - REGION C – Consistent Dynamics

The step response specification sets T86, % Overshoot, Travel Gain, Tss. Each class is based on the fastest control loop speed of
response ( λ ) available, given the valve T86 and Tss as specified. The four classes include: Very Fast (1 second), Fast (5 seconds),
Nominal (10 seconds), Slow (1 minute). The default is set for 5 sec. The valve performance index W calculates a composite weighting
for responses ranging from the minimum step size to twice this value.
T86 Step Response Time (seconds) by Fastest Loop Speed of Response Class (Function of Td / T86 Ratio)
Class 1 second 5 seconds 10 seconds 1 minute DEFAULT User
Td / T86 < 0.5 0.4 2 2 3 4 4 24 2
Td / T86 > 0.5 0.25 1.25 6 2.5 5 15 1.25
Tss Steady State Time (seconds) by Fastest Loop Speed of Response Class (Function of Td / T86 Ratio)
Class 1 second 5 seconds 10 seconds 1 minute DEFAULT User
Td / T86 < 0.5 1 5 10 60 5
Td / T86 > 0.5 0.63 3.1 6.3 38 3.2
Travel gain %Overshoot (% of step change)
Nominal DEFAULT User Nominal DEFAULT User
0.8 to 1.2 0.8 to 1.2 20 20
Valve Performance Index W - Weighting Factor - (Based on Equations 1 and 2) 0=perfect, 100=poor
W(T86) Equation 1 = W(Lambda) Equation 2 =
12

4.3 VALVE SIZING SPECIFICATION – (Responsibility – Process/Instrumentation Designer)
Flow Characteristic Nonlinearities:
This section of the specification is intended as a guideline for control valve sizing calculations. Valve sizing is an integral part of the
general design and sizing of the whole fluid transport system, and is concerned with designing the pressure drops taken across each of
the elements of the system, over the operating range of the process. The process designer has the ability to balance various aspects of
the design as the flow changes over the operating range. For example in a hydraulic system, the selection of the pump characteristics
and piping dimensions determine the pressure drop across the control valve. This, together with the selection of the control valve flow
coefficient and valve characteristic determines the flow gain, as well as the manner in which the flow gain varies over the operating
range. The flow coefficient selection also determines the range of operation of the flow, given the available pressure drops. The higher
the flow coefficient, the larger the flow range. The flow gain in part determines the process gain for the control loop, while the installed
characteristic of the valve determines the amount by which the process gain varies over the operating range of the process.
The selection of a given control valve system determines the minimum step size (Section 4.2), as well as the total hysteresis (Section
4.1). The amplitude of a potential limit cycle in the controller output is likely to be at least one half of the minimum step size. The
amplitude of a potential limit cycle in the fluid flow represents the potential for the control valve to create unwanted process variability,
and is a key measure of the control valve performance. This estimate of the potential amplitude of the flow limit cycle is the product of
one half the minimum step size times the installed flow gain. The flow limit cycle amplitude can hence be determined by selecting both
the minimum step size and the flow gain in combination. A high minimum step size implies a control valve system with mediocre
tracking performance. This can be partially offset by selecting a low flow gain. The lower the flow gain, the lower the flow limit cycle
amplitude for a given minimum step size. The process designer can specify a nominal value for the flow limit cycle amplitude, based on
product uniformity considerations. The instrumentation designer is then free to achieve this specification by selecting a control valve
system with a small minimum step size (better tracking performance) if the flow gain is high. Alternatively, the designer can re-size the
valve, or change the pressure drop profile in the fluid system to reduce the flow gain if the minimum step size is high. The design
process is a combination of both options.
The flow limit cycle can best be expressed as the amplitude of the potential process variability, on a percentage basis, by calculating the
limit cycle amplitude as a percentage of the nominal flow. The flow gain % is the flow gain in flow units / valve travel %, divided by the
flow at the minimum design operating point and expressed as a percent. The Flow Limit Cycle (%) is the minimum stem size times the
flow gain (%). The designer should consider the worst case in the process design (highest or lowest flow).
Maximum Allowed Flow Limit Cycle Amplitude (% of Nominal Flow) DEFAULT DEFAULT
Nominal Fine Very Fine Rotary Valves Sliding Stem User
Minimum Step Size (%) 2.0 1 0.2 2.0 1
Flow Gain (%) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Flow Limit Cycle (%) 1.0 0. 5 0.1 1.0 0. 5
The control loop process gain is a function of the flow gain, the relationship of the flow in the pipe to the measured process variable, and
the span of the transmitter used to make the process measurement. Ideally, the process gain should be approximately equal to unity
(% PV / % valve travel) for good design. The amount by which the process gain varies over the operating range of the process,
determines the degree to which the control loop will be difficult to tune. Poor tuning leads to control loop cycling and higher process
variability. Ideally the process gain range should be limited to +/- a factor of two.
Variation in Process Gain (Kp), DEFAULT DEFAULT

Nominal High Low High Low User
Nominal Kp (%/%) 1.0 1 2.0 1 0.5 1 2.0 0.5
Footnotes
1 Equivalent to Version 2.1 Combined Backlash & stiction limit of 1%
2 Closest Version 2.1 Equivalent 0-2 inch valve T86 = 1.43 x T63 = 0.43 sec.
4 Closest Version 2.1 Equivalent 20+ inch valve T86 = 1.43 x T63 = 3.4 sec.
7 In-process testing step size limited to ~10%. Can only imply conformance to larger values by extrapolating slope of Fig. 4.
13

5.0 TESTING PROCEDURES – IN-PROCESS
In-process testing for dead band, step resolution and total hysteresis can be done for most control loops with reasonably fast non-
integrating process dynamics such as flow or pressure. The key criterion is to be able to measure, observe and interpret changes in the
process variable as a result of stepping the control valve input signal. Where this is not feasible, such as on a tank level measurement,
it may be possible to install a downstream pressure transducer, or in some cases an ultra-sonic flow measurement can be used. The
tests are organized to measure control valve nonlinearities (dead band, step resolution) and response dynamics (T86, Td, O/S, KT,
Tss). The tests for nonlinearities are carried out using the process variable. The tests for response dynamics depend on a stem or
shaft transducer being available. The tests are organized to maximize testing efficiency and to take as little time as possible. The tests
include:
1. Test 1 - Initial Test consists of a few step tests that are larger than the minimum step size1. The test can be done in a few
minutes. If based on this test the valve fails to meet the requirements no further tests are needed.
2. Test 2 - Increasing Step Test consists of a sequence of step changes of increasing magnitude. The test takes about ten
minutes1. The test allows initial estimates of the dead band to be bracketed and some measurements of T86, Td, O/S, KT and Tss
to be made. It allows the minimum step size to be measured, and the valve performance index W to be calculated. If the valve
fails to meet the criteria being measured, then further tests are not needed. Also, if the test indicates that the dead band is very
small in comparison with the requirement, it may be possible to avoid doing the Test 3 - Small Step Test, which is quite time
consuming.
3. Test 3 - Small Step Test consists of a sequence of small step changes carried out in the same direction, with several reversals of
direction. The test is designed to accurately measure the dead band and step resolution and is required to pass the Nonlinear part
of the specification. The test is time consuming and requires about an hour to complete1.
4. Test 4 - Medium Step Test is similar to the Test 2 - Increasing Step Test and is intended to provide accurate measurements of
T86, Td, O/S, KT and Tss and the valve performance index W. The test requires about twenty minutes to complete1.
Some form of process measurement is always available even though some measurements may not be suitable for in-process testing to
be carried out. In many circumstances the availability of a stem transducer involves temporarily fitting a test transducer to the stem or
shaft. In some cases this cannot be done for safety reasons. If a stem transducer is not available the speed of response
measurements cannot be made, hence only the first three tests can be carried out, and only dead band, step resolution, total hysteresis,
flow gain and process gain can be determined.
1 Test times quoted are based on a T86 of 4 seconds. Longer test times are required for longer T86’s
5.1 General Preparation

1) Connect the channels of a data collection device to the controller output (valve input) signal and process variable signals at the
terminal strip. The process measurement will be used to determine conformance with the dead band, step resolution, total
hysteresis and process gain specification limits. If the process measurement is a flow or pressure, this is ideal. Other
measurements that imply flow, such as concentration or pH, can also be used. If the measurement is very slow, such as many
temperatures, or if the measurement is an integrating variable such as a tank level, then it is advisable to install a pressure
measurement downstream of the valve. If the fluid is a liquid, in some cases an ultrasonic flow measurement mounted externally
on the pipe can be made to work. The process measurement can be filtered to reduce the effect of noise. A filter time constant of
20% of wait time between steps is adequate, as steady state changes of the process measurement are of interest. Set up to
collect data at a rate of about 1 sample per second and start data collection.
2) In addition, install a valve stem, or valve shaft position measurement transducer. This transducer should have a time constant that
is at least 20 times faster than the expected step response of the valve being tested (T86). Connect this signal to the data
collection device. If the same data collection device is to be used for the process measurement and for the valve stem, then all of
the channels should be collected at the fast rate dictated by the stem transducer. If a separate data collection device is to be used
for the stem transducer, then this device should also measure the valve input signal in order to have the same time reference for
each step change. Calibrate the transducer so that it agrees closely with the zero and span of the input signal. The stem or shaft
transducer will be used to measure the speed of response of the control valve system. Set up to collect data at a rate at least 20
times faster than the expected valve step response time (T86).
3) Clearly establish the performance criteria which should apply to this control valve system, including: dead band, step resolution,
total hysteresis, minimum step size, maximum step size, T86, Td/T86, O/S, travel gain limits, Tss, flow limit cycle amplitude, flow
gain, process gain, range of process gain. Write down these values for future reference.
14

4) The control valve will be tested at or near the operating point at which it is working at the time of the test. The process operator
must be consulted in order to determine the magnitude of excursions that is acceptable under the operating conditions. If it is a
requirement to test the valve at a specific position, for instance at 10% open, then this must be done at the time when the valve
can be safely operated at this opening.
5) At the control console or controller faceplate, prepare to initiate a series of steps. Put the loop in manual mode and allow the
process to stabilize.
6) Each step in controller output (valve input) should be as abrupt as possible (square edged step). This is best done by entering a
new value via a keyboard in the control system. Some control systems only allow the controller output to be slewed via up/down
push buttons. This method does not provide a square edged step, but rather a ramp, and the consequence is that response
dynamics will be inaccurate. If a slew button must be used, each step should be made as a single push of approximately the right
duration to achieve the step size needed.
7) Test the data collection process, and ensure that high quality time synchronous data can be extracted to a common spreadsheet
software program for data manipulation, interpretation and presentation. All the data manipulation and presentation in this
document has been done using MicrosoftR Excel 97.
5.2 Test 1 - Initial Test

The purpose of Test 1 is to determine
that the valve tracking appears to work 32
and that further tests are warranted. Stem
Measure the input signal, the stem Input
position and the process variable. 31
Ideally a stem position transducer is
Input, Stem %
Note: Many O/S, U/S = "Excessive Ringing"

available and parameters such as T86
can be measured. If this is not the 30
T86 = 2.5 sec Travel Gain = 1.0, Tss = 70 sec
case and only the process
measurement is available, the test is
still worth doing, as at least it will 29
determine that the process signal
changes with input signal. Hence, it
will bracket the dead band and will O/S = 16%
28
also provide a measure of the process
0 20 40 60 80 100
gain. Carry out a few (at least two)
step tests with an amplitude greater Time - Seconds
than the minimum step size (well Figure 6 – Test 1 - Initial Test Example, Step size = -2.7%
inside Region C). Ensure that the T86=2.5 sec, O/S = 16%, Excessive Ringing, KT=1.0, Tss=70 sec
step tests allow adequate time for any
unusual behaviour to develop such as ringing. For this reason the wait time between steps should be at least a few minutes. Plot the
resulting response as shown in Figure 6. The example shows a single downward step of –2.7%. Even though the step response time
T86 is an acceptable 2.5 seconds and the overshoot is under the 20% limit, the response exhibits excessive oscillations or “ringing”
which causes the time to steady state (Tss) to be 70 seconds. This is 28 times T86 and is unacceptable because the specification
requires the ratio of Tss / T86 to be 2.5 or less, in order to ensure a fairly quick settling mode. Calculate the weighting factors using
Equations 1) and 2). (The result is 265 or very bad). A test result like this would suggest that further tests are not warranted until the
cause of the ringing is cured. Proceed to the next test only if Test 1 is clearly successful.
5.3 Test 2 - Increasing Step Size Test

The purpose of this test is to provide initial meaningful measurements of minimum step size, dead band, T86, Td/T86 ratio, overshoot,
travel gain, Tss and process gain. Measure the input signal to the valve, the stem or shaft position and the process signal. If the stem
position measurement is not available, the test is still worth doing as at least it will determine the input signal step sizes for which the
process signal changes, thus bracketing the bracket the dead band, and it will also provide a measure of the process gain. The test
involves a sequence of step tests starting with 0.25% and doubling the amplitude successively until 8% is reached (or whatever
maximum size the operator will allow) as shown in Figure 7. Each step is repeated four times in an up, down, down, up pattern. Ensure
that there is adequate wait time between steps. In Figure 7 the steps are applied every 20 seconds. For the valve in Figure 7 the
expected T86 is 4 seconds, hence a 20 second wait time should be adequate. For slower valves, a longer wait time would be needed.
15

60
However, regardless
of the expected T86,
Input, Stem %
there are other Step Size
55
considerations that 0.25% 0.5% 1% 2% 4% 8%
should also be taken
into account in 50
choosing the wait
time. The behaviour
45
exhibited in the Test 1 Partial Flow Response
- Initial Test should be
Flow %
taken into account. 40
As well, the slowness
No Flow Response
of the process Input
measurement should 35
Stem
also be considered for Flow Full Flow Response
there should be
30
adequate time for the
0 100 200 300 400 500
PV signal to actually
change and settle. Time seconds
From the process
Figure 7 – Test 2 - Increasing Step Test
measurement (PV) it
will be possible to
bracket the magnitude of the dead band effect, as it will be obvious that the PV did not change for some of the small steps, whereas it
did for the larger ones. The stem position can be used to measure T86, Td/T86 ratio, O/S and KT and Tss for each test. Analyze each
test and prepare a spreadsheet as shown in Table VII below. Calculate the weighting factors, using both Equations 1 and 2 (if loop
application knowledge available), for the step tests which pass the Region C criteria and which fall into the step size range from
minimum to twice the minimum step size. It is this range of input step sizes which best measures the regulation performance of the
control valve system. Calculate an average value for all of the weighting factors. Use all of the step tests involved – not just the good
ones. Table VII shows the analysis for 6 of the 24 step tests of Figure 7 as an example.
Table VII – Step Test Analysis

Specification Limits
Dead Bnd Stp Res Tot Hyst
0.50% 0.30% 1.00%
Min Step Max Step T86 Tss/T86 O/S % Tr Gain Kp Lambda

Spec 2.00% 10.00% 4 or 2.5 2.5 20 0.8 - 1.2 0.5 - 2.0 10
Actual 1.43%
Valve Performance
W weighting factors= 30 8 0.75 50 Index W
Step # Step Size T86 Td/T86 Tss Tss/T86 1 st O/S % #o/s,u/s Tr Gain Kp Region W(T86) W(Lamb) Comment
% sec sec Eqn 1 Eqn 2
1 0.25 7.67 0.84 9.4 1.23 0 0 1.05 0.00 A Hys> 0.25
6 0.5 5.95 0.82 7.5 1.26 0 0 1.09 0.00 A Hys> 0.5
10 1 4.13 0.74 13 3.15 5 0 0.99 0.51 B
14 2 3.04 0.77 9.4 3.10 5 0 0.97 0.65 C 30 23 Hys < 2
18 4 2.18 0.56 6.2 2.84 8 0 0.99 0.91 C 20 11
22 8 1.96 0.48 5.1 2.60 8 0 1.00 1.01 C
Region C Average Values Avg= Avg= Avg= Avg= Avg= Avg=
0.60 2.85 0.99 0.85 25 17
Min= 0.48 Min= 2.60 Min= 0.97 Min= 0.65
Max= 0.77 Max= 3.10 Max= 1.00 Max= 1.01
On the basis of Figure 7 and the analysis of Table VII, it is clear that the total hysteresis caused by dead band or step resolution is
greater than 0.5% and definitely less than 2% (based on process gain). As the minimum step size has been set at 2%, the valve in
question meets this aspect of the specification.
It is critically important to accurately estimate the actual minimum step size. This is the point at which T86 vs. step size curve crosses
the specification limit for T86 (Region - example 4 seconds), and to also determine that this point is within the specification limit for the
minimum step size (example 2%). Figure 8 shows a plot of the T86 versus step size results for the 24 step tests of Figure 7. The
result is 1.43%, which indicates that this control valve system exceeds the specification limit of 2%.
16

It is natural to expect there to be a fair amount of 10
scatter in the test results. It must also be expected Trend Line
that the point at which the T86 vs. step size test Regression = Power Law
results cross the T86 limit is straddled by two sets 8 y = T86, x = step size
of adjacent points. This can best be resolved by y = 4.6622x
-0.4242
calculating a regression trend line as shown in 2
T86 seconds
6 R = 0.9619
Figure 8. The trend line should clearly pass
through the adjacent clusters of test results.
T86 limit = 4 seconds
4
The weighting factors have been calculated for
step sizes ranging from the minimum of 2% to 4%
(double the minimum step size). The responses 2
are generally well shaped have fairly low valve Trend Line Intercepts T86 Limit at Step Size = 1.43%
performance index of 36, indicating quite a good
0
result (zero is perfect and 100 is poor). However,
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
the Td/T86 ratio is clearly greater than 0.5 for steps
of 4% and less, hence this is a consideration which Step Size %
would require the faster 2.5 second T86 limit to be Figure 8 – T86 vs. Step Size Plot for step test of Figure 7
imposed, as opposed to the 4 second value in order
to minimize dead time. On this basis, the test valve
is borderline since the 2% steps have a T86 of 3 seconds.
5.4 Test 3 - Small Step Test

The purpose of the Test 3 - Small Step Test is to measure the dead band and step resolution as accurately as possible. Should a stem
transducer not be available, this is the only accurate test that can be carried out. Measure the input signal and the process variable.
There is no need to measure the stem position, as the step sizes will be less than the expected step resolution in magnitude, and only
steady state changes are of interest. The signals should be filtered to reduce the impact of noise. A filter time constant of 10 seconds
is adequate, as long as the wait time between steps is at least 50 seconds.
The test involves a sequence of small steps applied first in one direction, and then in the other as shown in Figure 9. The size of the
steps must be smaller than the expected magnitude of either the dead band or step resolution, so that these parameters can be
accurately bracketed. A suggested step size is one half of the smaller of dead band or step resolution. The valve in the Figure 9
example is the same as used in Figure 7. A step size of 0.2% was used in Figure 9. The absolute maximum and minimum values of
valve position depend on the process operator. However, consideration must also be given to the number of steps and the length of the
test. Figure 9 shows nearly 50 steps, each with a wait time of one minute, for a total duration of 50 minutes. As well, it is important to
perform at least two full cycles of the input signal from minimum to maximum for adequate repeatability.
Figure 9 is relatively easy to analyze. The 51 43

first three “up” steps caused the flow to
Input Signal %
change by 0.4%. Little can be said about this

result as the valve dead band was simply
50
being taken up in the up direction. After the
first reversal in direction, it took five “down” 42
steps to cause the flow to change. Based on

this, the dead band is less than 1% (5 x 49
0.2%). After this first change in flow in the
Flow %
down direction, it took two “down” steps to 41

cause a change in flow. Based on this the 48
step resolution is less than 0.4%. This is
also true of all subsequent changes in flow,
which occurred in the same direction. All of 47 40
the reversals in direction required 5 steps 0 600 1200 1800 2400 3000
before the flow changed, except for the
Time seconds
reversal which started at about second 1000,
which required six steps. Hence the dead Figure 9 – Test 3 - Small Step Test
17

band is less than 1.2%. The largest value should be taken. The total hysteresis can be estimated as the sum of the dead band and step
resolution, or less than 1.6% (1.2% + 0.4%).
Test 3 of Figure 9 involved nearly 50 steps, took 50 minutes, produced 13 changes in flow. It yielded the conclusion that dead band is
less than 1.2%, the step resolution is less than 0.4%, and the total hysteresis is less than 1.6%. Given the specification limits are:
dead band less than 0.6%, step resolution less than 0.4% and total hysteresis is less than 1%, the valve in question fails.
X-Y Plot
Another way to view the same data is an X-Y plot as shown in Figure 10. To generate such a plot involves estimating steady state data
after each step change has settled. This involves taking a filtered value or an average of both the input signal and the process variable
just before the next step is applied. Once this data is generated it can be plotted as an X-Y plot using most commonly spreadsheet
software programs. The data shown in Figure 10 is the same as in Figure 9. The run starts at an input signal of 50.0% and a flow of
41.3%, and two full cycles are executed. If the valve were ideal, the flow would follow the “ideal flow” line as shown in Figure 10. This
line goes through the initial point on the X-Y plot and has a slope equal to the process gain (Kp). However, Figure 10 shows a tendency
for the input signal to change without causing any change in flow. This is a result of the dead band. From Figure 10, two estimates of
the dead band can be made: 0.8% and 1.0%. Since 1% is the larger number, this should be reported. Once motion is initiated the
relationship between input signal and flow is not very regular. If the step resolution were infinitely fine, the figure should have straight
sides parallel to the ideal flow line. The irregularity of the figure is a measure of the step resolution. The total hysteresis is the total
width of the figure as measured from the Low-Low line to the Hi-Hi line (lines passing through the points furthest away from the ideal
flow). This is estimated as 1.12% in Figure 10, and is also the estimated value of the total hysteresis. The minimum hysteresis is the
distance between the Hi-Low and Low-Hi lines (lines passing through the points nearest to the ideal flow). This is estimated as 0.41% in
Figure 10. An estimate of the effective step resolution is half the difference between the total and minimum hysteresis, or 0.36%
((1.12% - 0.41)/2). Hence the final results based on Figure 10 are: a dead band of 1.0%, a step resolution of 0.36% and a total
hysteresis of 1.12%. Based on this interpretation the valve in question fails the specification on dead band and total hysteresis limits.
42
Flow-vs-Input
Ideal Flow Dead Band 1.0%
Low-Low
41.5
Hi-Low
Low-Hi
Hi-Hi
Flow %
1.12% Tot Hysteresis

41
0.41% Min Hysteresis
40.5 0.8% Dead Band
40
48.5 49.5 50.5
Input %
Figure 10 – X-Y Plot for Test 3 - Small Step Test of Figure 5. Hysteresis: Max = 1.12%,
Min = 0.41%, Dead Band=1%, Step Resolution=0.36%, Total Hysteresis=1.12%
No matter what the results, the interpretation will be to some extent subjective. Valve users will wish to argue that slightly questionable
results represent failure, while valve suppliers will argue the opposite. The key issue is that there are not very many tests available on
which to base statistics. Hence, the interpretation of the data requires some judgment.
5.5 Test 4 - Medium Step Test

The Test 4 - Medium Step Test is intended to accurately measure the dynamic response of the valve system, specifically: minimum step
size, T86, Td / T86 Ratio, % overshoot, % undershoot, travel gain, Tss. Measure the input signal and the stem or shaft position. Use
the fast sampling rate for the measurements. A measurement of the PV is not required. The test is similar to the Test 2 - Increasing
18

Step Test, except that the step sizes for the test should start inside Region B. The number of tests depends on how many statistics are
needed. The size of the steps should start at an initial value which is less than (one half) the minimum step size found during in Test 2,
and the step size should increase up to a Table VIII – Test 4 - Medium Step Test Suggested Sequence
maximum value set by the process operator. In Step Size (n x Minimum Step Size) Number of Steps Calculate W
this way the steps will transition out of Region B o.5 4
into Region C. Hopefully, Region D will also be
1.0 10 Y
reached. If not, then the shape of the resulting
1.5 10 Y
T86 vs. step size curve (Figure 4) should indicate
2 10 Y
if the maximum step size requirement could be
4 4
met, based on the slope of the line. Special
emphasis should be placed on step sizes that are 8 4
typical of normal control loop regulation, and for Maximum 2
which control valve performance index can be Total = 40
calculated. This involves step sizes ranging from
the minimum step size (as found in Test 2 - Increasing Step Test) to double this value. A suggested number is 40 step tests.
Suggested step sequence is shown in table VIII:
Each of the step tests should be analyzed as in Section 5.3, and a similar table should be built. Determine the minimum step size using
regression as shown in Figure 8. If this value of minimum step size differs by more than 30% from the value used when starting this
test, repeat the test using the new value to select step sizes. A figure similar to Figure 4 should be plotted. For the valve to pass the
specification, there should be consistent dynamic responses in Region C, as defined by the limits on minimum step size, T86, Td/T86
ratio, travel gain, overshoot and Tss. Performance index weighting factors should be calculated for small step sizes as indicated.
6.0 Definition Section:

The terms defined below are common with previous EnTech control valve specifications and terminology adopted by ISA. Where
possible, ISA terminology has been adopted in order to make the specification commonly understood.
Amplitude Ratio: for sinusoidal signals the ratio of output amplitude to input amplitude.
Approximate Time Constant ( τ ' ): approximate time constant for the control valve system step response, (T86 divided 2).
Backlash: mechanical lost motion caused by looseness in a mechanism. Backlash causes dead band to be observed.
Closed Loop Time Constant (Lambda ( λ )): the time constant of a control loop as tuned. The user is free to tune a control loop to a
desired λ value in order to achieve process-manufacturing objectives. The value of λ which can be safely achieved is limited by the
speed of response of the process, the transmitter and the control valve.
Closure Member: the part of the control valve that is in direct contact with the flowing fluid (valve trim, plug, disc, ball etc.) and which
causes progressive throttling of the fluid.
Control Valve Assembly: same as a control valve system.
Control Valve Package: same as a control valve system.
Control Valve System: a system consisting of control valve, actuator, positioner and any other components needed to allow the control
valve closure member track the input signal.
Dead time (Td): the time period after an input signal step change and prior to the start of a response. For practical purposes, dead time
can be estimated by measuring the time that the response crosses 10% (T10) of the full steady state change.
Dead Band: the range through which the input signal can be changed, without causing a change in output. Dead band results from
various phenomena, such as backlash and shaft deflection, and causes the valve system to require extra input change after a reversal
of direction before actual movement is resumed. In Versions 2.1 and earlier, this phenomenon was referred to as “backlash”. The term
dead band has been adopted to fully comply with ISA terminology.
dB: decibel, unit to measure attenuation of sinusoidal signals as 20 Log (Amplitude Ratio)
Flow Coefficient: the coefficient which determines the flow through a valve given the fluid, valve opening, upstream and downstream
pressures (and temperatures for some fluid).
Flow Gain (Kf): for a step change in input signal, the ratio of the change in flow passing through the control valve and the change in
input signal (flow units /% valve travel).
Flow Gain % (Kf%): the flow gain expressed as a percentage of the minimum design flow under a given operating condition (normally
there are minimum, nominal and maximum flows design figures). (flow units /% valve travel / nominal flow) x 100%).
Flow Resolution (Rf): the minimum change in the fluid flow that the control valve can produce (step resolution x flow gain).
Hunting: a tendency for a feedback system to oscillate about its setpoint.
Hysteresis: the combined effect of dead band and step resolution that prevents changes in flow coefficient response in spite of
movement in the input signal. Hysteresis is seen as displacement in an X-Y plot (see Figure 10) in the input signal dimension.
19

Integrating Variable: a process variable, such as tank level whose rate of change is determined by the net flow into a vessel of a certain
volume. Moving a control valve causes the rate of change of the integrating variable to alter.
Linear Dynamics: a single set of dynamic parameters (gain, time constants) of a linear transfer function model.
Limit Cycle: a sustained control loop cycle or 'hunting' caused by a nonlinear element in the loop such as the control valve. Limit cycling
can also be caused by the integral action of valve positioners and can occur in the valve system itself.
Nonlinear Dynamics: dynamic parameters (gain, time constants) which change over the operating range.
Minimum Step Size: in this specification, the minimum user specified value of input signal step size for which the control valve system is
to conform to the Dynamic Response Specification limits (lower limit of Region C). Also, value form test results.
Maximum Step Size: in this specification, the maximum user specified value of input signal step size for which the control valve system
is to conform to the Dynamic Response Specification limits (upper limit of Region C).
Overshoot (o/s): the amount by which the step response initially exceeds the final steady state value (% of step change).
Process Gain (Kp): for a step change, the ratio of the change in process variable to the change in input signal (process change % of
span / valve input change %).
Process Resolution (Rp): the minimum change in the process variable that the control valve can produce (Rs x Kp).
Process Variable (PV): the process measurement used for feedback control by the loop to which the control valve is connected.
Process Dynamic: the way a process variable responds, over time, to a change in controller output. This is best characterized by the
step response, modeled by a transfer function and expressed in terms of process gain, time constants and deadtime.
Regions A, B, C, D: nonlinear regions defined as input signal step size varies from small to large, over which a control valve system
exhibits different nonlinear behaviour. Region A – no movement, Region B – inconsistent movement, Region C – consistent movement,
in which values are within specification limits, Region D – velocity limited movement.
Ringing: a tendency for a dynamic system to oscillate after a step change.
Self Regulating Process: a process whose step response reaches a new steady state value after an input step change.
Step Resolution (Rs): the minimum step change in input signal to which the control valve system will respond while moving in the same
direction. The phenomenon is caused by the tendency for a control valve to “stick” after coming to rest. Sometimes referred to as
stiction, or stick-slip. An ISA term for this does not yet exist.
Shaft: for a rotary valve the actuator member that transmits torque to rotate the closure member.
Stem: actuator member that forces the closure member to move through the range of valve travel.
Speed of Response: of a dynamic non-integrating system can be gauged by measuring the time constant of a first order model which
approximates the dynamic response of the actual system. For process control, T86 provides a fair “goodness of fit”.
Step Response Time (T86): the time after an input signal step change until the output has reached 86.5% of the final steady state
value. Since a first order linear system reaches 86.5% of the step response value in two time constants, T86 divided by two provides a
useful approximate time constant value for the valve system.
Stiction: a term used in control literature meaning a tendency to stick-and-slip, due to the presence of high static friction. The
phenomenon causes a limited resolution of the resulting control valve motion. ISA terminology has not settled on a suitable term yet,
however the term Resolution has been proposed.
Stick-Slip: the tendency of a control valve system to stick while at rest, and to suddenly slip after force has been applied.
Travel Gain (KT): the ratio of valve stem or shaft change (% travel) to valve input signal change. In some positioner designs logic exists
to compensate for control valve characteristics (equal percentage, quick opening). In this specification the term travel gain implies a
nominal value (for which 1.0 is the ideal) which has been normalized for any such compensation.
Time constant: the time required for a first order linear system to reach 63.2% of the full change after a step change.
Time to Steady State (Tss): time at which the stem position within 1% of its steady state value.
Total Hysteresis: term used in the specification to denote the combined effect of dead band and step resolution. Can be measured by
performing Test 3 - Small Step Test - see Figure 10. Can be estimated as dead band plus step resolution.
Undershoot: amount by which the stem position falls below its final steady state value (% of step change) after an overshoot.
Valve Characteristic: the characteristic curve as the flow coefficient varies with valve travel (equal percentage, linear, etc.)
W(Lambda): valve step response performance index weighting factor calculated by Equation 2) which weights the relative step response
performance in the presence of dead time, varying settling time, overshoot and travel gain, using the closed loop time constant Lambda
as a basis.
W(T86): valve step response performance index weighting factor calculated by Equation 1) which weights the relative step response
performance in the presence of dead time, varying settling time, overshoot and travel gain, using T86 as a basis.
References
1) EnTech - Control Valve Dynamic Specification (Version 2.1, 3/94),
2) ANSI/ISA-S51.1-1979 - Process Instrumentation Terminology.
3) ISA Standard-S75.13-1989 Method of Evaluating Performance of Positioners with Analog Input Signals & Pneumatic Output.
20

For more information:
For more information on Variability Management please visit our website

www.EmersonProcess.com/solutions/VariabilityManagement , or
Contact us at:
email: [email protected]
phone: +1 512-832-3575
Emerson Process Management

12301 Research Blvd.
Research Park Plaza, Building III
Austin, Texas 78759 USA

Entech Control Valve Dynamic Specification

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Entech Control Valve Dynamic Specification

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Entech Control Valve Dynamic Specification

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Control Valve Dynamic Specification

(Version 3.0, 11/98)

1.0 Competitive Marketplace

economic potential for the plant. Plant process variability

closely enough (Figure 1). This undesirable behaviour of Time seconds

Control Valve Dynamic Specification - Purpose

About Version 3.0

Copyright EnTech 1998 – All Rights Reserved

2.0 Control Problem Definition

Ideal Control Valve System Step Response

2.1 Speed of Response

Copyright EnTech 1998 – All Rights Reserved

values should be established for both the

and final values should be averaged over

2.3 Tss as a Function of T86

Copyright EnTech 1998 – All Rights Reserved

2.4 T86, Dead time and Control Performance

step responses all with the 37 TC = 1.4 sec

Copyright EnTech 1998 – All Rights Reserved

3.0 Control Valve Nonlinearities

1. control valve tracking nonlinearities,

3.1 Control Valve Tracking Nonlinearities

3.1.1 Nonlinear Regions

Copyright EnTech 1998 – All Rights Reserved

User Selection of Minimum and Maximum Step Sizes

Copyright EnTech 1998 – All Rights Reserved

8 T86 < 4 sec

Figure 4 – Region C – Consistent Responses

Copyright EnTech 1998 – All Rights Reserved

Table V – Weighting Factors – Step Sizes ranging from Minimum to 2 x Minimum

W(T86) = (Td/T86) x 30 + Abs(Tss/T86 – 2.5) x 8

W(Lambda) = ((Td/T86) x 30 + Abs(Tss/T86 – 2.5) x8) x (T86 x 2.5 / Lambda)

Copyright EnTech 1998 – All Rights Reserved

Table VI – Weighting Factors for Figure 2, 3 and 6 Example Responses

3.2 Flow Characteristic Nonlinearities

Copyright EnTech 1998 – All Rights Reserved

3.2.1 Flow Resolution and Process

3.2.2 Limit Cycle Amplitude – Process Variable

Copyright EnTech 1998 – All Rights Reserved

3.4 Documentation – Specification Sheet

3.5 User Selection of Specification Parameters

3.7 Passing the Specification – Responsibility and Dependency on Instrumentation

Copyright EnTech 1998 – All Rights Reserved

4.1 NONLINEAR SPECIFICATION – (Responsibility - Control Valve System Vendor)

Valve Tracking Nonlinearities (% input signal) DEFAULT DEFAULT

Minimum Step Size (%) DEFAULT DEFAULT

Maximum Step Size (%) 7

STEP RESPONSE - REGION C – Consistent Dynamics

Copyright EnTech 1998 – All Rights Reserved

Variation in Process Gain (Kp), DEFAULT DEFAULT

Copyright EnTech 1998 – All Rights Reserved

5.1 General Preparation

Copyright EnTech 1998 – All Rights Reserved

5.2 Test 1 - Initial Test

Note: Many O/S, U/S = "Excessive Ringing"

5.3 Test 2 - Increasing Step Size Test

Copyright EnTech 1998 – All Rights Reserved

Table VII – Step Test Analysis

Min Step Max Step T86 Tss/T86 O/S % Tr Gain Kp Lambda