CLIL +a+lesson+framework+
CLIL +a+lesson+framework+
CLIL +a+lesson+framework+
In the first of these articles, Content and Language Integrated Learning, I gave
an introduction to this field. In this second article I will look more closely at how
CLIL is realised in the classroom and suggest a framework for planning CLIL
lessons.
● Underlying principles
● Classroom principles
● Lesson framework
● Conclusion
Underlying principles
The principles behind Content and Language Integrated Learning include global
statements such as 'all teachers are teachers of language' (The Bullock
Report - A Language for Life, 1975) to the wide-ranging advantages of
cross-curricular bilingual teaching in statements from the Content and
Language Integrated Project (CLIP). The benefits of CLIL may be seen in
terms of cultural awareness, internationalisation, language competence,
preparation for both study and working life, and increased motivation.
While CLIL may be the best-fit methodology for language teaching and learning
in a multilingual Europe, the literature suggests that there remains a dearth of
CLIL-type materials, and a lack of teacher training programmes to prepare both
language and subject teachers for CLIL teaching. The theory may be solid, but
questions remain about how theory translates into classroom practice.
Classroom principles
Some of the basic principles of CLIL are that in the CLIL classroom:
In a CLIL lesson, all four language skills should be combined. The skills are
seen thus:
For teachers from an ELT background, CLIL lessons exhibit the following
characteristics:
Lesson framework
A CLIL lesson looks at content and language in equal measure, and often
follows a four-stage framework.
Language identification
Learners are expected to be able to reproduce the core of the text in their own
words. Since learners will need to use both simple and more complex language,
there is no grading of language involved, but it is a good idea for the teacher to
highlight useful language in the text and to categorise it according to function.
Learners may need the language of comparison and contrast, location or
describing a process, but may also need certain discourse markers, adverb
phrases or prepositional phrases. Collocations, semi-fixed expressions and set
phrases may also be given attention as well as subject-specific and academic
vocabulary.
Conclusion
From a language point of view the CLIL 'approach' contains nothing new to the
EL teacher. CLIL aims to guide language processing and 'support language
production in the same way as ELT by teaching strategies for
reading and listening and structures and lexis for spoken or written language.
What is different is that the language teacher is also the subject teacher, or that
the subject teacher is also able to exploit opportunities for
developing language skills. This is the essence of the CLIL teacher training
issue.