An Introduction To Breton Grammar

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 104

AN INTRODUCTION

TO

BRETON GRAMMAR.
AN INTRODUCTION
TO

BRETON GRAMMAR
DESIGNED CHIEFLY FOR THOSE CELTS AND OTHERS IN GREAT
BRITAIN WHO DESIRE A LITERARY ACQUAINTANCE,
THROUGH THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE, WITH
THEIR RELATIVES AND NEIGHBOURS
IN LITTLE BRITAIN

BY

J. PERCY TREASURE
Member of the Council of the Cornish-Celtic Society

CARMARTHEN: W. SPURRELL & SON


MDCCCCIII.
PREFACE.

THE principal object which influenced the writer in


bringing out this small volume was a need admitted
to exist by not a few competent to form an opinion
for some simple exposition in English of the Grammar
of the Breton Language, which would be of service to
that large and rapidly growing section of the British
race which desires an acquaintance with the literature
and language of their Armorican relatives in Little
Britain. Of this section a considerable proportion have
been deterred by their imperfect knowledge of the third
language hitherto essential to such acquaintance. And
this definition of its scope may be said to determine the
limits of its 'Sphere of influence,' for the writer makes
no pretence to have compiled a treatise by the mastery
of which, the tyro could be justified in supposing him-

equipped for the purpose of sustaining a con-


self fully

versation in the Breton language. It will rather seek


to demonstrate by rule and paradigm many of the
former strangely familiar on this side of the Channel
the high degree of excellence attained by this ancient
tongue, and its faithfulness to its Celtic origin; and that
too, despite both its complete isolation from its con-
geners in Great Britain, as well as the repressive efforts
put forth from time to time, directly and indirectly, to
deprive this language of its very existence.
That the government of a country which adopts as
6 PREFACE.

embodying its highest political aspirations the


motto,
Equality, and Fraternity,' should at the
4

Liberty,
beginning of this twentieth century be compassing the
extinction of a language vernacular to some two
millions of its bravest and most devoted citizens is, to
the more happily-circumstanced Briton, a strangely
anomalistic position To find a parallel to such an
!

arbitrary and autocratic measure as that issued by the


French Minister of Spiritual Affairs, and dated Sep-
tember 29th, 1902 (whereby over one million Breton
people are deprived of all effective religious instruction
by the insistence thatsuch instruction be given in
French only), it is happily necessary for us in Great
Britain to go as far back as the time of the Reforma-
tion; when the partially-understood Latin service
book was withdrawn from the Cornish Church, on
the excellent plea that all public worship should be
4
offered in accordance with Apostolic precept in a
known tongue '
at the same time with the utmost in-

consequence the authorities imposed an English service


book, hardly one word of which was intelligible to the
Cornish people! That privilege which the Welsh
were powerful enough to secure to themselves by
statute law (v. Elizabeth; xiii. xiv. Charles II.), the

Cornish, on the petition of their Anglophile gentry (on


commercial grounfeproh pudorf)*, as well as on account
of their relatively small numbers, lost. May the Breton

people escape the fate of their Cornish cousins, for


jam proximus ardet Ucalegon!

p. 4 Polwhele's Literature of Cornwall.


PREFACE. 7

The genesis of this little work is as follows. With


the object already described, the writer contributed
month by month a series of papers to the Celtic Asso-
ciation'sorgan Celtia, and having heard some very
kind expressions of appreciation, he was encouraged
thereby to hope that with the addition of other rele-
vant matter, these papers might serve yet higher pur-
pose if printed in book form.
In method, this work follows, more or less closely, the
treatment of Armoric Grammar by Le Gonidec, a very
Hector of Breton grammarians. Villemarque, the
learned scholiast on Le Gonidec, has laid it down that
4
the dialect of Leon is for the Bretons that which the
Attic was for the Greeks/ and by postulating this, has
rendered unnecessary any explanation from future
writers on Breton grammar as to why that dialect, of
all the varying dialects of Brittany, should be selected
for representative place. For in Brittany, it should be

remembered, we have four well-defined areas (practi-


cally diocesan) of dialect; namely, Treguier, Leon,
Cornouaille, and Vannes, and many of these differ the
one from the other as extensively as they all do from
Welsh, or Manx from Scotch or Irish Gaelic. And
not only so, but within these areas, communes vary the
diocesan vernacular almost to the extent of the differ-
ence between North and South Walian, and greater
than that which divides between North- and South-side
Manx, Connaught- and Munster-Irish, or even Caith-
ness- and Argyle-Scotch. The melligenous speech of
the Vannetois may constitute him the
Chrysostom of
Brittany, or even of Celtdom itself; the fervour of the
8 PREFACE.

Breton Cornishman and the contemplative spirituality


of the Trecorrois has furnished Emile Souvestre with
abundant material for his unrivalled sketches of Breton
life; but it is to the refined language of Leonais that
the grammarian must ever turn for his material, follow-
ing in the tracks of Le Pelletier, Rostrenen, and Le
Gonidec.
It is to these Fathers of Breton grammar that the
writer gratefully acknowledges his indebtedness, but

especially to the latter, for had not Le Gonidec stereo-


typed the language, and by doing so saved it from
complete disintegration, it were a futile thing to-day
to provide an aid to understanding that which no longer
had existence. The following extract from the Ap-
pendix to Norris' Cornish Drama'* will not be with-
'

out interest (and possibly instruction) to those who are


most likely to take up this book. In a few words and
by some exceedingly well-chosen parallels, Mr. Norris
has succeeded in showing, coup d'ceil, the precise rela-
tionship 'of the Cymric class; wherein the Welsh differs
as much from the two others (i.e. Cornish and Breton)
as French from Spanish, whilst Cornish and Breton
stand in a closer relation; these resemble each other
more than Dutch and German, as much perhaps as

Portugese and Spanish, but not so closely as Scotch


and Irish/ In spite of statements to the contrary, the
writer (i.e. Mr. Norris) is of opinion that a Breton,
within the historical existence of the two dialects, could
not have understood a Cornishman speaking at any

* '

p. 458 Norris' Cornish Drama,' Oxford.


PREFACE. 9

length, or onany but the most trivial subjects; he is


himself unable to read a sentence in Breton of more
than half-a-dozen lines without the help of a diction-
ary. Mr. Scawen (a Cornishman), near the close of
the seventeenth century, made a similar remark as
quoted in the preface to Pryce's Vocabulary. He ob-
serves Words of one another, 'tis true, three sorts of
:
*

people do understand alternately; not all, but mostly


such as are radical. Colloquies of one another they do
not enjoy.' Mr. Norris' or Dr. Pryce's Welshman
might, of course, have received a letter written in the
vernacular of Brittany or Cornwall and returned answer
in his own, without either party experiencing much
difficulty in getting at the meaning of the other, but
letsuch an one attempt a conversation on the basis of
such previous understanding, and he will immediately
be convinced of the completeness of that process of
disintegration which, commencing at Babel, is still in
active operation to-day !
10 AN INTRODUCTION

CHAPTER I.

THE ALPHABET.
The orthography of the Breton Language is more
exact than that of Cornwall, but not so correct as that
of Wales, with both of which branches of Brythonic

speech it is in otherwise close resemblance, idioma-


tically and phonetically.
Its sounds are indicated by the following 24 letters, 18
of which are consonants, 6 are vowels. The value of
each letter is given in English as well as in Celtic, the

gradations observed by precise Gaelic orthographers


being given where possible.
4 '
Celtic B. English explosive B.
Celtic C. Modified by juxtaposition to broad
or slender vowel, as in
1. English K in
'

ing,'
'

eep.'
2. English hard C in 'could,' 'car,' 'com-
*
fort.'

D Celtic hard D. English


'

explosive
'
D.
F Celtic ph, ff.
English strong f.

*
K is frequently written Ou, the
'
littera mendica, sine u tanijuam
hacillo nikil potest, et cum u nihil valet amplius yuarn k.' Farrar on
Greek Syntax, p. u.
TO BRETON GRAMMAR. II

Celtic G. English hard G, submitting to two


modifications

2.
'
This letter has been '
Gallicized away until its

present value is no greater than the Greek


spiritus lenis; it serves to preserve ortho-
graphy, but has no orthoepic significance.
Celtic S with slender vowel. S in Welsh .sv'arad,'
'

English S
'
and in Gaelic 'szhn.' in .sure.'

Celtic CH. The English language is unfortu-


nate in not possessing this sound. The Breton
c'h is at present in a state of transition owing

to Gallic influence: at the beginning of words


it is frequently softened to a spiritus asper, as

in 'c'hoas' (pronounced hoas '), whilst at the


'

end of a word it hardens into k, as in


'
Pen-
marc'h' (pronounced penmark'). This is a
'

tendency, however, which should meet with


the scant consideration it deserves at the hands
of Celtic people remote from this influence.
It is noteworthy that the distinctive sound of

c'h has perished from the dialect of Vannes.


Is a foreign letter, having no literal equivalent
in English or Celtic, but common in French,
as in 'jardin.' All the words now spelt with
j as initial letter are found in older works
with the vowel i in place of /, where its
phonetic value is that of the Hebrew yod.
Has the two sounds common to Gaelic Celtdom,

although in Breton its power is not invariably


I 2 AN INTRODUCTION

decided by contact with broad and slender


vowels. These two sounds occur in English
(
1. /ot/ '/ump.'
* 4
2. va//'ant,' vermi//*bn.'
Neither here nor in Cornish can the Welsh
find support for their characteristic aspirated

liquid LI.
As in English, but occasionally
Celtic, as in
' '

(always a tendency in Breton), as


nasalized

though involuntarily, by propinquity to the


following letter,
Has three distinct sounds
r
1. The normal power, as in Eng. 'wag,' *;;o.

2. As in English miw/on,' o;bn.'


' '

3. A
sound irreproducable from any English
word, but sufficiently recognized both in
Scottish Gaelic and French, and almost
the highly nasalized power found in Welsh
'

fy fiJad.'
f This letter is the distinguishing factor of
Breton speech, as much so as the LI of the
Welsh, and the recurrent w,' aw of the
' ' '

Cornish.
As in Celtic, English explosive.
Is the Celtic broad R, almost found in English
'

words, very virulent.' Slightly less trilled


than Welsh, and never the V
grasseye of the
French. The true litter a canina.
Is a sibilant of greater or less power, but has
never the low value properly reserved to the
letter z.
TO BRETON GRAMMAR. 13

As in English. Gaelic tendency to lingual

protrusion should be avoided.


V Welsh F. Gaelic Bh. English V.
Z English Z when initial, but becoming more
strongly sibilant in the middle of words, and
possibly at the termination of a word, though
it is an open question whether z coming as

a terminal letter in dissyllabic and polysyl-


labic words should be pronounced as Welsh
'
'dd'=Cornish '
dh (i.e. English th in
' '

'
wither to which connection it may in-
').,

variably be traced. The firmer pronuncia-


tion is characteristic of Northern Brittany.

The above catalogue of consonant letters is not with-


out interest to the observant, for it serves to show how
a Celtic language when in a position of isolation
from other languages of its own family, and living side
by side with a Latin speech, has, in the first place, a
marked tendency to surrender some distinctively Celtic
sounds; in the second place, to approximate other
native sounds to the standard of their neighbours; and
in the third place, to appropriate and embody sounds
which originally found no place in its alphabet, and
which indeed are foreign to the genius of the language.
Very few such changes have taken place where the
Celtic Race has found itself dwelling side by side with
the Teutonic; in such a case there is no change of sound,
and little of idiom, no system of 'give and take:' the
line which separates linguistically, between Celt and

Teuton, is drawn as hard and fast as though they


14 AN INTRODUCTION

had but come together yesterday. In this country


thereis no borderland, where
people speak half- Welsh-
half-English, half-Irish-half-English, as in the case of
some towns of Brittany, where the idiom is wholly
Breton, whilst the vocabulary is wholly French, and
vice versa. Here we meet with no one who addresses
us in a mixed medley of Welsh and English, in Brit-

tany such an one is


frequently met, being the son of
one who so spoke. Here the Celt may speak the
Saxon tongue, imparting his native intonation in such
a manner as to proclaim his nationality, though never
consciously and of set purpose merging every idiom of
one language into that of another, but there is affinity
and a degree of fusion between Irishman and Spaniard,
Scotchman and Frenchman. Breton and Frenchman.
The Gaulo-Latin and the Hispano-Latin visitor, im-
parting of his own characteristic speech to the Celt,
leaves behind traces of their alliance long after such
alliance ceases to be a matter of common knowledge;
but where shall we seek for similar literal or verbal

interchange between Teuton and Celt ? have the We


solitary exception to prove our rule in the case of
Manx Gaelic, a language which has incorporated a
certain number of Scandinavian words within itself
and become to them but how utterly
* '
habituated ;

insignificant Teutonic
this element is in the Manx
is at once apparent from a perusal of Prof.
language,
Rhys' scholarly and exhaustive treatise on Manx
Phonology,* with this object in view. That all such
* Manx
Vol. xxxiii. Society, Rhys and Moore's Book of
Common Prayer.
TO BRETON GRAMMAR. 15

receptivity on the part of Celtic is not entirely due


to the partly Celtic extraction of the French and

Spanish nation, but that such fusion is rather due to


the affinity which exists between the Latin and Celtic
speech may be demonstrated by the large number of
Latin words received into the Welsh language at the
time of the Roman occupation of Britain.

VOWELS.
These are six in number, A, E, I, O, U, W, of
which the first five have a double value, a long-
quantity, indicated by the circumflex accent (an acute
accent in the case of vowel E), and a short quantity,
which is the normal condition of the letter and is un-
distinguished by accentuation.
The sound of these vowels is that common to most
Celtic and Continental languages, though the U of
' '

the Breton does not follow the U sound of the Welsh,


but the normal value of that vowel throughout Celt-
dom.
The value of the diphthong very readily resolves
each letter imparting equally its own unvarying
itself,

sound, so that there is no occasion to burden the


learner with rules for their proper pronunciation.
The sounds quite naturally blend with one another in
a manner which cannot be other than accurate.
The Welsh reader of Breton (and to a certain extent
the English reader) may, for all practical purposes r
treat the combination OU
as his letter W, by which plan
l6 AN INTRODUCTION

he will be saved much trouble in the not uncommon


event of finding three !,or four vowels in collocation.
As would appear to have been the case in Cornish,
and as undoubtedly the case in English (less in
is

grammatical, greater in provincial English), the value


of the vowel in each particular district is not absolutely
fixed, and the learner may allow himself a greater
degree of latitude in this matter than would be safe in
the matter of Welsh or Gaelic.
TO BRETON GRAMMAR. 1 7

CHAPTER II.

THE ARTICLE.
In his excellent Grammar of the Cornish language,*
Mr. Tenner disputes the right of that language to an
indefinite article, being of opinion that such usage is
traceable to a Saxon source and is foreign to the

primitive language, and in this contention he is almost


certainly correct. But its use is less extensive in
Cornish than in Breton, in which language, whatever
itsorigin, its value cannot be ignored, nor its preval-
ence denied.
It may be well for us here to recollect that in this
language we find that characteristic tendency of Celtic
speech which makes for perfect euphony and uninter-
rupted fluence between word and word, sentence and
sentence, carried to its highest pitch of development.
To such an extent does this tendency go, that not only
do we find a system of initial mutation carried to a
point beyond other Celtic languages, but also a system
of euphonic terminal mutation (unconnected with
accidental significance) which, being recognised in part

by other families of Celtdom, has in the Breton lan-


guage its extremely well-defined place.
This tendency is well exemplified by the Breton
Article.

* The Mss. of which he has kindly permitted me to see.


2
i8 AN INTRODUCTION

THE DEFINITE ARTICLE.


This article is written in three forms, viz.:
ANN before a vowel and consonants DN T.
AL before the consonant L.
AR before all other consonants.

THE INDEFINITE ARTICLE.


This article is alsofound in three forms, viz.:
EUNN before a vowel and consonants DN T.
EUL before the consonant L.
EUR before all other consonants.

Both of these Articles are subject to declension


throughout all cases.
TO BRETON GRAMMAR. 19

not required before proper nouns, of country,


article is

town, and island though there are notable exceptions


to this rule in Welsh, Y Wyddfa, Y Bala, Y Gelli,
&c. Thus the Breton speaks of his country as Breiz,
and of one of his islands as Enez Eiisa, unlike the
Englishman who
' '

goes to the Isle of Man,' or the Isle


of Arran.'
A few examples by way of illustration of the above

principles are here given.

1. Ar ger euz ann Aotrou.


The word of the Lord.
2. Ar pen-kenta euz al lizer d'ar C'halated.
The beginning of the Epistle to the Galations.

3. Eunn tamm euz a eunn askourn.


A fragment of a bone.

4. Eur c'han euz a eul levr ar Salmou.


A chant of a Psalter.

N.B. In actual practice it is customary to omit the


mark of the genitive case, its position immediately

following the preceding substantive being sufficient


indication of case; whilst the articular emphasis,
which in English requires stress on the spoken, and
italics on the written word, finds expression in Breton

often by the opposite process the total omission of


any article

1. Ar pen-kenta euz Aviel Jesus Krist, Mab Doue.


The beginning of (the) Gospel of Jesus Christ,
(the) Son of God.
2. Roue Bro-Zaos a oe klanv.
(The) King of England has been ill.
20 AN INTRODUCTION

CHAPTER III.

THE PRONOUN.
Pronominal usages are frequent and varied in the
Breton language.
In treating of the pronoun, it should be borne in mind
that though the pronoun may take a like form in differ-
ent cases, persons, genders, and numbers, yet its sig-
nification is rendered entirely unambiguous by an
elaborate and ingenious system of initial mutation,
which will be explained in the chapter on Mutation.'
'

THE PERSONAL PRONOUN.


Nominative Case.
Singular. Plural.
TO BRETON GRAMMAR. 21

Accusative used Genitivally.


Singular. Plural.

1. Ac'hanoun (of) me Ac'hanomp (of) us


2. Ac'hanod (of) thee Ac'hanoc'h (of) you
3. Anezhan (of) him Anezho (of) them
Anezhi (of) her

Dative Case.
*
1 . D'in to me D'eomp to us
2. D'id to thee D'ehoc'h to you
3. D'ezhan to htm D'ezho to them
d'ezhi to her

EXPLANATION. Though the pronoun as thus given


may have an involved appearance, it is not such in
fact, as the following explanations will show.
1. The forms in square brackets are the pronominal
terminations of that Celtic (and useful) combination of
preposition with pronoun,t as: Ganen (with me), ganez,
ganthan; ganeomp, ganeoc'h, gantho. Hepzoun (with-
out me) hepzoud, hepzhan hepzomp, hepzoc'h, hepzho.
;

2. The 2nd person plural, Accusative Case [hu] is a

terminal insistant, and serves to further distinguish the


person as Mar kirit-hu (if YOU wish).
3. The Alternative c'h precedes vowels.
4. The interchange of broad with slender vowels (a

*
D' (= da) in conjunction with a pronoun is the sign of the dative
case, d' am zad, to my father] d' az c'hoar, to your sister.

f Prof. Rhys regards these syntheticisms as evidence of pre-Aryan


influence.
22 AN INTRODUCTION

with c] in conjunction with the same consonant will


be explained hereafter. (Verbal enclitics, q.v. p. 26.)
5. There are many rules for the position of the pro-
noun all in harmony with Celtic usage, and none
peculiar to Breton; but in simple construction the
objective pronoun follows closely the subjective.

Me ho trugareka' I thank you

THE POSSESSIVE PRONOUN.


This pronoun takes two forms, the first of which is
identical with the primary form of the accusative case
of the personal pronoun, and which may be called the

simple form; the second, denoting absolute possession,


may be styled the emphatic form.

Simple Form,
Singular. Plural.

1. Ma or va my or mine Hon or hoi or hor our


2. Ta or da thy or thine Hoc'h or ho your
3. He his Ho their

Emphatic Form.
I . Ma hini or re my very Hon hini or hor re our
own very own
2. Ta hini or re thy very Hoc'h hini or ho re your
own very own
3. He hini or re his very Ho hini or re their very
own own
TO BRETON GRAMMAR. 23

Hint or re being used according to whether the pos-


session indicatedis in the singular or plural number.

THE DEMONSTRATIVE PRONOUN.


The demonstrative pronoun in Breton is very exact,
having many subtle shades of meaning unknown to
the English language; as Dr. Pughe, speaking of
the six classes of Welsh demonstrative pronoun, re-
marks that they make a discrimination of person and
'

situation for which the English this and that are not

equivalent/ so we may affirm of Breton.

FIRST. The use of the Definite Article emphasized by


pronominal particles, hini in singular and re in
plural.

SECOND. He-man (masculine), hou-man (feminine);


becoming re-man in the plural, which answers to
the Cymric hwn yma, hon yma; and y rhai hyn.
This form is more emphatic than the preceding.

THIRD. Hennez (masculine), hounnez (feminine); ar


re-ze (plural) = Latin Hie, haec; and haec 'this
nearer object.' Cymric, hwna, hona; y rhai yna.

FOURTH. Henhont (masculine), hounhont (feminine);


ar re hont (plural) =. Latin ille, ilia; ilia, 'that re-
moter object.' Cymric Hwn yna hon yna; y rhai
,

hyn yna.
24 AN INTRODUCTION

FIFTH. An independent interrogative, as

Ann drd man


(Y peth ymd)
The thing under consideration
i

i i

Ann drd ze Ann drd-hont


(Ynd) (*)
less remote. more remote.

THE INTERROGATIVE PRONOUN.


The following pronouns are used interrogatively:
Pehini which ? who ? plural, pere
Piou who ?
( Petra what ? (= what thing?} why ?
\ Pebez what? (Welsh, pa beth ?} .

Of these pehini (plural pere) is used- relatively as well


as piou ben nag (Welsh, pwy by nag], whoever, and
petra-bennag (Welsh, beth bynag], whatever.
The Relative Pronoun in Breton, as in Welsh and
Cornish, is frequently omitted, being understood.

W. Efe yw'r dyn a welais.


B. Hen eo ann den me a welaz.
C. Ev yu an den mi a welys.
E. He is the man whom I saw.
TO BRETON GRAMMAR. 25

CHAPTER IV.

THE VERB.
The Breton language is rich in the possession of

three auxuliary verbs, of which the utmost use is made.


These are Beza, to be; Kaout, to have; and Ober, to
do (the latter as extensively used as an auxiliary, as in
Cornish and the Gaelic languages). The various tenses
of these verbs enter into loose composition with the
infinitive mood of the principal verb to a most useful

degree. In addition to this method of conjugation,


all verbs are used both personally and impersonally

that is to say, they may be conjugated throughout


each person of the tense, each tense of the mood, and
each mood of the verb, and are then termed personal
verbs; or, the third person singular of each tense may
be used in conjunction with the pronoun proper to each
person of the tense, and separated from it
by an enclitic,
in which case they are designated impersonal verbs.
The rule for the proper employment of the personal
and impersonal verb is thus given by Le Gonidec,
though the rule is not without its exceptions.
When the subject is a noun substantive or personal
pronoun which commences a sentence, the verb which
follows it must be conjugated 'impersonally.'
When the sentence opens with an adverb or preposi-
tion, when the accusative case precedes the verb
or
{which in our language is very frequently the case), the
verb is conjugated 'personally.'
26 AN INTRODUCTION

The enclitic particles a and e (ez, ec'h) enter largely


into the construction of the Breton verb, and its alter-
native use is decided by the following circumstances.

1. When a noun or pronoun (in either the nomina-


tive or accusative case) immediately precedes,
the verb, the broad particle (a) is introduced
into its structure.
2. But when an adverb or a preposition immediately
precedes the verb, the slender particle (e) is
introduced, euphonized to ez and ec*h before
vowels.
3. EXCEPT in the present indicative (which in this
case employs no particle), when the verb beza
(to be) ispreceded by an adjective, the slender
particle with its modifications is introduced.
Exempla
1 . Me a wel eur stereden . / see a star.
Ar gwin a zo marc'had mad The wine is cheap.
Bara a zebr He eats bread.
2. Aliez^'kompsann Brezonek I often speak Breton*
Aliez ez inn I shall often go.
3. Klan e oa He was ill.
Pinvidik c vezo He will be rich.
N.B. The verb, as in Welsh, is negatived by means
of thetwo negative particles, ne and ket, the former of
which precedes and the latter succeeds the verb to be
negatived.*
Ne kano ket He will not sing.

* In
literary Breton this practice is much observed, being coun-
tenanced by the parallel French usage of ne-pas, a Celtic survival
'
like the r grasseyeV
TO BRETON GRAMMAR. 27

I.

THE AUXILIARY VERB BEZA (to be).

Personally conjugated.
INDICATIVE MOOD.

Present Tense.
Singular. Plural.
I.
28 AN INTRODUCTION

OPTATIVE MOOD.
1st Conditional Tense.
1. Bizen, bijenn, bienn, benn* ^
2. Bizez, bijez, biez, bez > should be
3. Size, bije, bie, be

1. Bizemp, bijemp, biemp, bemp^


2. Bizec'h, bijec'h, biec'h, bec'h > should be
3. Bizent, bijent, bient, bent /

2nd Conditional Tense.


Singular.
1. Ra venn I might be
2. Ra vez thou mightst be
3. Ra ve he might be
Plural.

1 . Ra vemp we might be
2. Ra vec'h you might be
3. Ra vent they might be

IMPERATIVE MOOD.
Singular. Plural.

I. Bezomp let us be
2. Bez be thou Bezit be ye
V Bezet let him be Bezent let them be

INFINITIVE MOOD.

Present, Imperfect, Perfect, and Future Tenses.

Beza, to be
Present Participle O veza, being
Perfect Participle Bet, been
* In descending order of literary merit.
TO BRETON GRAMMAR. 29

II.

THE AUXILIARY VERB BEZA (to be).

Impersonally conjugated.
INDICATIVE MOOD.
Present Tense.
Me a zo Ni a zo / am
Te a zo C'houi a zo
Hen a zo Hi a zo

Imperfect Tense.
Me a oa Ni a oa / was (wont to be)

&c. &c.

Me a oe / have been

I shall be

SUBJUNCTIVE AND IMPERATIVE MOODS.


Present Tense.
(As the personal verb.)

OPTATIVE MOOD.
1st Conditional Tense.
Me a ve Ni a ve I should be
&c. &c.

2nd Conditional Tense.


(As the personal verb.)
3O AN INTRODUCTION

INFINITIVE MOOD AND PARTICIPLES.

(As the personal verb.)

Le Gonidec mentions a third method of conjugation


much in vogue amongst the people of Leon, which
consists in placing the infinitive verb before the per-
sonal finite verb, and introducing the slender enclitic,
as this
Present. Imperfect.
1 . Beza ez ounn* Beza ez oann
2. Beza ez oud Beza ez oaz
3. Beza ez eo Beza ez oa

Perfect. Future.
1. Beza ez oenn Beza e vezinn
2. Beza ez oez Beza e vezi
3. Beza ez oe Beza e vezo
&c.

And yet another method, occasionally met with,


noticed by the same authority

Indicative Present.
1. Bezann Bezomp
2. Bezez Bezit
3. Bez Bezont

Colloquialisms have attacked and taken large


liberties with this verb.

*
Colloquially, Bdz' ez ounn, &c.
TO BRETON GRAMMAR. 3!

I.

THE AUXILIARY VERB KAOUT (to have).

Personally conjugated.
INDICATIVE MOOD.
Present Tense.
Singular. Plural.

1. Em euz I have \
Hon euz we have
2. Ec'h euz thou hast \ Hoc'h euz you have
3. Hen deuz he has \
Ho deuz they have

Imperfect Tense.
1 . Em boa / was having
2 . Ez poa thou wast having
3. Hen doa he was having

1 . Hor boa we were having


2. Ho poa you were having
3. Ho doa they were having

Perfect Tense.
1 . Em boe / had Hor boe we had
2. Ez poe thou hadst Ho poe you had
3. Hen doe he had Ho doe
\

they had

Future Tense.
1 . Em bezo / shall have
2. Ez pezo thou wilt have
3. Hen devezo he will have

1 . Hor bezo we shall have


2 . Ho pezo you will have

3. Ho devezo they will have


AN INTRODUCTION

SUBJUNCTIVE MOOD.
Present Tense.
Singular. Plural.

i . R'am bezo / may have R'or bezo we may have


2. R'az pezo thou mayst R'6 pezo you may have
have
3. R'en devezo he may R'6 devezo they may have
have

OPTATIVE MOOD.
1st Conditional Tense.
1 . Em pe / should \
>
,
have
Hor be we should have
or might )
2. Az pe thou shouldst Ho pe you should have
have
3. Hen defe he should Ho defe they should have
have

2nd Conditional Tense.

1. R'am should R'or befe


befe^
2. R'az pefe > or R'6 pefe
3. R'en defe /
might have R'6 defe

IMPERATIVE MOOD.
i. Hon bezet us have
let

2. Ez pez have thou Ho pezet have you


3. Hen defet let him have Ho defent let them have

INFINITIVE MOOD, Kaout (to have).


Present Participle 6 kaout having [6 veza]
Perfect Participle [Bet had]
TO BRETON GRAMMAR. 33

II.

THE IMPERSONAL VERB KAOUT.


Strictly speaking, this verb has no personal form,
but merely two impersonal forms; but Le Gonidec
classes Form I. as a personal verb, in order to preserve
the rule given for the employment of the personal verb

(p. 25). The Tenses of Form II. run as follows:

INDICATIVE MOOD : Present Tense, me am euz ;


Im
Perfect, Me am boa; Perfect, Me am boe; Future, Me
am bezo.

SUBJUNCTIVE MOOD : not rendered in this form.

OPTATIVE MOOD: ist, Me am be; 2nd, not rendered


in this form.

IMPERATIVE MOOD : not rendered in this form.

INFINITIVE MOOD : not rendered in this form.

I.

THE AUXILIARY VERB ODER (to do}.

Personally conjugated.

INDICATIVE MOOD.

Present
Singular.
I. Rann I do
2. Rez thou doest
34 AN INTRODUCTION

Imperfect Tense.
Singular. Plural.

1. Reann I was doing Reamp we were doing


2 . Reez thou wast doing Reac'h you were doing
3. Rea he was doing Reant they were doing

Perfect Tense.
1. Riz I did Rezomp we did
2. Rezoud thou didst Rezot you did
3. Reaz he did Rezont they did

Future Tense.
1. Rinn I shall do Raimp we shall do
2. Ri thou wilt do Reot, raiot you will do

3. Raid he will do Raint they will do

SUBJUNCTIVE MOOD.
Present Tense.
1. Ra rinn I may do
|
Ra raimp we may do
2. Ra ri thou mayst do \
Ra reot you may do
3. Ra raio he may do \
Ra raint they may do

OPTATIVE MOOD.
1st Conditional.

1. Raen I should do Raemp we should do


2 . Raez thou shouldst do Raec'h you should do
3. Rae he should do Raent they should do
TO BRETON GRAMMAR. 35

2nd Conditional.
Singular. Plural.

i . Ra raenn / might do \
Ra raemp we might do
2 . Ra raez thou mightst do Ra raec'h you might do
3 . Ra rae he might do Ra raent they might do

IMPERATIVE MOOD.

I. Greomp let us do
2. Gra do thou Grit do ye
3. Graet let him do G raent let them do

INFINITIVE MOOD.

ober (to afo.)

Present Participle Oc'h ober doing


Perfect Participle Great having done
AN INTRODUCTION

CHAPTER V.

The verb Karout, as a paradigm of the Breton verb,


is here given in all its forms.

I.

THE REGULAR VERB KAROUT (to love).

Personally conjugated.
INDICATIVE MOOD.

Present Tense.
Singular. riural.

1. Karann I love Karomp we love


2. Karez thou lovest Kirit you love

3. Kar he loves Karont they love

Imperfect Tense.
i. Karenn I was loving \

Karemp we were loving


2 . Karez thou wast loving Karec'h you were loving
3. Kare he was loving Karent they were loving

Perfect Tense.
1. Kiriz I loved Karzomp |
we loved\\
2. Karzoud thou lovedst Karzot you lovet

3. Karaz he loved Karzont they lovet

Future Tense.
1. Kirinn I shall love Kirimp we shall lovt
2. Kiri thou wilt love Kerrot you will lovt\

3. Karo he will love Kirint they will lov t


TO BRETON GRAMMAR. 37

SUBJUNCTIVE MOOD.
Present Tense.
Singular. Plural.

1. Ra girinn I may love Ra girimp we may love

2. Ra giri thou mayst lave Ra gerrot you may lave

3. Ra garo he may love Ra girint they may lave

OPTATIVE (OR CONTINGENT) MOOD.


1st Conditional Tense.
1. Karfenn* I should or Karfemp we might love

might love
2. Karfez thon mightest Karfec'h yon might love
love

3 . Karfe he might love Karfe nt they might love

2nd Conditional Tense.


I. Ragarfenn I might love j
Ra garfemp
2. Ra garfez t
Ra garfec'h
3. Ra garfe [
Ra garfent

IMPERATIVE MOOD.
I. Karomp let us love
2. Kar love thon Kirit love ye

3. Karet let him love Karent let them love

INFINITIVE MOOD Karout (to love).

Present Participle O karout loving


Perfect Participle Karet loved
*
The modal stem letters/ (=ph); z=.j=i (=dh), upon
which personal inflexions are based, are practically interchangeable
throughout this mood of the Breton verb.
AN INTRODUCTION

II

THE REGULAR VERB KAROUT (to lave).

Impersonally conjugated.

INDICATIVE MOOD.

Present Tense.
Singular. Plural.

1 . Me a gar
^ English
as 1 Ni a gar
2. Te a gar \ personal j
C'houi a gar
3. Hen a garj verb. Hi (hint) a gar

Imperfect Tense.
1 . Me a gare Ni a gare
2. Te
a gare C'houi a gare
3. Hen a gare Hi a gare

Perfect Tense.
1 . Me a garaz Ni a garaz
2. Te a garaz C'houi a garaz
3. Hen a garaz |
Hi a garaz

Future Tense.
1 . Me a garo Ni a garo
2. Te a garo C'houi a garo
3. Hen a garo Hi a garo

SUBJUNCTIVE MOOD.
(Not rendered impersonally.)
TO BRETON GRAMMAR. 39

OPTATIVE MOOD.
1st Conditional Tense.
Singular. Plural.

1. Me a garfe Ni a garfe
2. Te a garfe C'houi a garfe
3. Hen a garfe Hi a garfe

2nd Conditional Tense.

(Not rendered impersonally.)

IMPERATIVE MOOD.

(Not rendered impersonally).

INFINITIVE MOOD.

(Not rendered impersonally.)

III.

THE REGULAR VERB KAROUT (to love).

Personally conjugated with the Auxiliary Verb BEZA.

INDICATIVE MOOD.

Present Tense.
1. Karedounn I am loved Kared omp we are loved
2. Kared oud thou art Kared oc'h you are loved
loved
3. Kared eo he is loved Kared int they are loved
4o AN INTRODUCTION

Imperfect Tense.
Singular. Plural.

1. Kared e oann I was Kared e oamp we were be-

being loved ing loved


2. Kared e oaz thou wast Kared e oac'h yoii were
being laved being loved
3. Kared e oa he was be- Kared e oant they were
ing loved being loved

Perfect Tense.
\ . Kared e oenn / was Kared e oemp we were
loved loved
2. Kared e oez thou wast Kared e oec'h you were
loved loved
3. Kared e oe he was loved Kared e oent they were
loved

Future Tense.
1. Kared e vezinn I shall Kared e vezimp we shall
be loved be loved
2. Kared e vezi thou wilt Kared e vezot you will be
be loved or viot loved
3. Kared e vezo he will be Kared e vezint they will
loved be loved

SUBJUNCTIVE MOOD.
Present Tense.
i. Ra vezinn karet I may Ra vezimp karet we may
be loved be loved
2. Ra vezi karet thou Ra vezot karet you may
mayst be loved or viot be loved

3. Ra vezo karet he may Ra vezint karet they may


be loved be loved
TO BRETON GRAMMAR.

OPTATIVE MOOD.
1st Conditional Tense.
Singular. Plural.

Kared e venn I should Kared e vemp we should


be loved be loved
Kared e vez thou Kared e vec'h you should
shouldst be loved be loved
Kared e ve he should Kared e vent they should
be loved be loved

2nd Conditional.
1. Ravennkaret I might Ra vemp karet we might
be loved be loved
2. Ra vez karet thou Ra vec'h karet you might
mighst be loved be loved
3. Ra ve karet he might Ra vent karet they might
be loved be loved

IMPERATIVE MOOD.
I.

2. Bez karet be loved

3 . Bezet karet let him be


loved
AN INTRODUCTION

IV.

THE REGULAR VERB KAROUT (to lave).

Impersonally conjugated with the Auxiliary Verb BEZA.

INDICATIVE MOOD.

Present Tense.
Singular. Plural.

1 . Me a zo karet \ English Ni a zo karet


2. Te a zo karet L C'houi a zo karet
3. Hen a zo karet ) verb. Hi a zo karet

Imperfect Tense.
1 . Me a oa karet Ni a oa karet
2. Te a oa karet C'houi a oa karet
3. Hen a oa karet Hi a oa karet

Perfect Tense.
1 . Me a oe karet Ni a oe karet
2. Te a oe karet C'houi a oe karet
3. Hen a oe karet Hi a oe karet

Future Tense.
1 . Me a vezo karet I Ni a vezo karet
2. Te a vezo karet C'houi a vezo karet
3. Hen a vezo karet Hi a vezo karet

SUBJUNCTIVE MOOD.

(Not rendered impersonally.)


TO BRETON GRAMMAR. 43

OPTATIVE MOOD.
1st Conditional Tense.
Singular. Plural.

1. Me a ve karet Ni a ve karet
2. Te a ve karet C'houi a ve karet
3. Hen a ve karet Hi a ve karet

2nd Conditional Tense.

(Not rendered impersonally.)

IMPERATIVE MOOD.

(Not rendered impersonally.)

INFINITIVE MOOD.

(Not rendered impersonally.)

V.

THE REGULAR VERB KAROUT (to love).

Personally conjugated with the Auxiliary Verb KAOUT.


INDICATIVE MOOD.

Present Tense.
i . Kared em euz / have Kared hon euz we have
loved lovea
2. Kared ec'h euz thou \ Kared hoc'h euz you have
hast loved \
loved
3. Kared hen deuz he has Kared ho deuz they have
loved loved
44 AN INTRODUCTION

Imperfect Tense.
Singular. Plural.

Kared em boa / had Kared hor boa we had


laved loved
Kared ez
poa thou Kared ho poa you had
hadst loved loved
Kared hen doa he had Kared ho doa they had
laved loved

Perfect Tense.
1 . Kared em boe N English Kared hor boe
\ as Im-
2. Kared ez poe Kared ho poe
,., \ptrfoct
3- Kared hen doe ) Tense. Kared ho doe

Future Tense.
1 . Kared em bezo / shall Kared hor bezo we shall
have loved have loved
2 . Kared ez pezo thou wilt' Kared ho pezo you wilt
have loved have loved
3. Kared hen devezo he Kared ho devezo they will
will have loved have loved

SUBJUNCTIVE MOOD.

Present Tense.
R'am bezo karet I may R'or bezo karet we may
have loved have loved
R'az pezo karet thou R6
T

pezo karet you may


mayst have loved have loved
R'en devezo karet he R'6 devezo karet they may
may have loved have loved
TO BRETON GRAMMAR. 45

OPTATIVE MOOD.

1st Conditional Tense.


Singular. Plural.

1 . Kared em be I should \
Kared hor be we should
have loved have loved
2. Kared ez pe thou Kared ho pe you should
shouldst have loved have loved
3. Kared hen defe he Kared ho defe they should
should have loved have loved

2nd Conditional Tense.

i . R'arn befe karet / , R'or befe karet we might


might have loved have loved
2. K'az pefe karet thou R'6 pefe karet you might
mightst have loved have loved
3. R'en defe karet he R'6 defe karet they might
might have loved have loved

IMPERATIVE MOOD.

(Lacking.)

INFINITIVE MOOD.

Kaout karet to have loved

Present Participle (Lacking).

Perfect Participle (Lacking).


AN INTRODUCTION

VI.

THE REGULAR VERB KAR OUT (to love).

Impersonally conjugated with th<: Auxiliary Verb


Kaout.

INDICATIVE MOOD.

Present Tense.
Singular. Plural.

1. Me em euz karet Ni hon euz karet


2. Te e'ch euz karet C'houi hoc'h euz karet
3. Hen hen deuz karet Hi ho deuz karet

Imperfect Tense.
1. Me em boa karet Ni hor boa karet
2. Te ez poa karet C'houi ho poa karet
3. Hen hen doa karet Hi ho doa karet

Perfect Tense.
1 . Me em boe karet I Ni hor boe karet
2. Te ez poe karet C'houi ho poa karet
3. Hen hen doe karet Hi ho doe karet

Future Tense.
1 . Me em bezo karet |
Ni hor bezo karet
2. Te ez pezo karet C'houi ho pezo karet
3. Hen hen devezo karet Hi ho devezo karet

SUBJUNCTIVE MOOD.
Present Tense.

(Not rendered impersonally.)


TO BRETON GRAMMAR. 47

OPTATIVE MOOD.
1st Conditional Tense.
Singular. Plural.

1 . Me em be karet Ni hor be karet


2. Te ez pe karet C'houi ho pe karet
3. Hen hen defe karet Hi ho defe karet

2nd Conditional Tense.

(Not rendered impersonally.)

IMPERATIVE MOOD.

(Lacking.)

INFINITIVE MOOD.

(Not rendered impersonally.)

VII.

THE REGULAR VERB KA ROUT (to love).

Personally conjugated with the Auxiliary Verb OBER.


INDICATIVE MOOD.

Present Tense.
i . Karoud a rann I do love Karoud a reomp we do
love
2 . Karoud a rez thou dost Karoud a rit yon do love
love

3. Karoud a ra he does Karoud a reont they do


love love
AN INTRODUCTION

Imperfect Tense.
Singular. Plural.

Karoud a reann^ as Karoud a


i.
'
reamp
,
2. Karoud a reez > act of Karoud a reac'h

3. Karoud a rea J Karoud a reant

Perfect Tense.
1 . Karoud a riz 7 did Karoud a rezomp o> did
/ore love
2. Karoud a rejoud* thou Karoud a rezot you did
didst love love

3. Karoud a reaz ^ afr# Karoud a rezont they did


love love

Future Tense.
1. Karoud a shall be Karoud a raimp
rinn^ \

2 Karoud a ri > Karoud a reot


.
the ct O j
3. Karoud a raid / loving. Karoud a raint

This form is conjugated only in the Indicative Mood.

*
The parasitic fricative j (dzh) almost invariably usurps the
place of z, which more correct use is now regarded as archaic.

Agreeably with expectation, and as in other languages, colloquial

usage has taken large liberties with this person, the extent of which
may be gauged by a comparison of the foregoing with the summary
treatment of the original ez (=yth) by Zeuss (Grammatica Celtica,
p. 507); yet oddly enough, side by side with this, there is clearly
discernible a tendency to revert to the original type, or rather to go

beyond it by the conversion of final mediae to tenues. This ten-


dency is noticed here (and will be illustrated hereafter) for the pur-

pose of emphasizing that peculiarity which serves to distinguish


TO BRETON GRAMMAR. 49

CHAPTER VI.

NOTES ON BRETON VERBS.


1. Active verbs become passive when their perfect

participle enters into loose composition with the tenses


of the Auxiliary Verb beza, or, when in the impersonal

form, they are preceded by their perfect participle. But


there is an independent passive form, which consists in
adding to the stem of the (impersonal) verb, in place
of its proper tense termination, -er for the present, -ed
for the imperfect and perfect, -or for the future, -fed
for the ist conditional, and -edeur for the infinitive

mood; Me a garer, Me a gared, &c.


All regular verbs belong to one conjugation only,
2.

in which conjugation the tense terminations of the


first person singular are as follows:

INDICATIVE MOOD.

Present, -ann; Imperfect, -enn; Perfect, -iz; future,


-inn.

this speech from others of its Aryan relatives (even of its Celtic
'

congeners, whose use of provection is relatively small).


'
In the
'
sea of decaying phonetics which stretches from the Himalayas to
'

Achil Head, Armorica is the backwater in which swirl '


construc-
' '

tive and '


destructive tendencies, and Celtic precision ever wars
with Gallic slovenliness (vide Spectator, April 25th, 1903. '

English
as spoken in Ireland').

4
50 AN INTRODUCTION

SUBJUNCTIVE MOOD.

Present, -inn;* 1st Conditional, -fenn; 2nd Con-


ditional, -fenn;* Participle, -et.
3. The stem of a Breton verb is discovered in the
2nd person singular of the imperative mood.
4. Government of Number :
(1) The personal verb knows little distinction
of number it is
usually singular in the
3rd person, but the impersonal verb takes
its proper number.
(2) Nouns, coupled by the conjunction ha, hag,
even though of the plural number, govern
a singular verb.

(3) The negatived verb follows in number a


plural subject.
(4) Two negatived nouns coupled by na (neither
.... nor) govern a plural verb.
according to Breton use, a verb re-
'

(5) When,
duplicates,' the former part is in the in-
finitive mood, the second part takes its

proper number: Beza ez ounn, &c.


5. An interrogative sentence is introduced by ha
before a consonant, and hag before a vowel, placed im-
mediately before the verb (or the pronoun which pre-
cedes the verb, expressed); except when the verb is
if

personally rendered, when the order of the sentence is


as follows: Participle, pronoun, auxiliary verb, pro-
noun emphatic, when ha, hag is omitted; but a noun-

* With the (mutated) root preceded by the particle ra, itself

one of the mutated forms of the verb ober.


TO BRETON GRAMMAR. 51

subject requires the interrogatival introductive even


in this case, and the position of the noun-subject is
last inthe sentence, and requires stress in viva voce.
N.B.As the object of this work is to help rather
to a literary than colloquial acquaintance with the
Breton language, many of those rules commonly found
in books on Grammar are omitted, it being thought
advisable not to overburden and obscure the text with
too copious notes, unimportant exceptions, and (rare)
alternative readings. Its object is not to teach gram-

mar, but to place before the reader who is also a


grammarian materials, by the intelligent use of which
he will speedily find himself able to read the most easily
acquired language of Celtdom. Those desiring a closer
and more introspective examination of the structure of
the Breton verb, must go to the rock whence this is
hewn Le Gonidec, and compare his findings with
results deducible from a study of the Breton Bible

(Trinitarian Bible Society), or New Testament (British


and Foreign Bible Society). It is only fair to state,
however, that owing to a commendable desire to be
understanded of the people, neither of these versions
boast the literary merit of Le Gonidec's Bible, or the
New Testament of de Mai, Bishop of St. Brieuc; the
modern versions exhibit far too many
*

gallicisms.'
52 AN INTRODUCTION

CHAPTER VII.

THE NOUN.
Proceeding along the line indicated in the last para-
graph, there will be little to say under this heading.

GENDER.
I.There are but two genders, masculine and femi-
nine, the former, of course, including all males, and the
latter all females. An office or estate which may be
held by either, or is common to both, is expressed by the
sex of the person holding it when recorded parent,
neighbour, &c., otherwise, by the masculine gender.
II. Of necessity then, a number of nouns having
no sex implied in themselves must fall, as in all Celtic
languages, under one of these two headings of gender;
this difficulty will be appreciated at its proper value by

Celtic, rather than by English-speaking people. For


instance, Gambold's rule conveys but little to the mind
uninstructed in the Welsh language. 'Any word be-
ginning with one of the mutable consonants, except //

and rh, if
upon putting the article y in apposition
before consonant does naturally change
it, its initial

into its light sound, as melin,


y felin; caseg, y gaseg;
such words are infallibly of the feminine gender.' Such
remark recalls the well-worn but witty criticism on a
certain book of cookery, publishing its unrivalled re-

cipe for 'jugged hare:' First catch your hare! Just


TO BRETON GRAMMAR. 53

so far is Gambold's rule of use to those learning the

Breton language, and its application mutatis mutandis


is equally sound in Welsh and Breton. (See Chapter
XI. on Mutations.)
III. Le Gonidec, in his usual painstaking way,
details the indication of sex in some seventeen classes
of nouns; these details of a kind made familiar to us
in Rowlands' Welsh Grammar, Stewart's Gaelic Gram-
mar, and other high standard Celtic works are of
little use for our purpose. The Celt, as before men-
tioned, will find nothing to shock his sense of propriety
in the matter of gender; indeed the Welshman (ignor-
ance forbids me to speak so precisely for the Gael) will
find pleasure in noticing how his own division of gen-
der is closely followed by the Breton.

NUMBER.
I.There are two numbers, singular and plural, the
plural being usually, though not by any means invari-
ably, formed from the singular.* By far the most
common method of forming the plural is by the addi-
tion of ou to the (nominative) singular, except where
that singular ends in f
preceded by a vowel, in c*h,
single /, single single r, u, in z (where z changes
, o,

to s), in all of which cases the plural is formed by the


addition of iou.
II. Some singular nouns shorten in the plural.*

*
In some instances the singular appears to be formed from the
plural where the latter is the natural division, as in Welsh, adar,
birds sing., aderyn; plant, children; sing., plentyn, &c.
\
54 AN INTRODUCTION

III. Other nouns (principally names of animals)


form their plural by the addition of ed, many by the
addition of ten.
IV. Some philologists profess to see the relics of a
once flourishing dual number in the Breton as in
Cornish and Welsh also nomenclature for those parts
of the body of which we are normally in possession of
a pair, and which together are spoken of as aim diou
vreac*h (the two arms), ann diou c*hdr (the two legs),

reserving their plural form, brec'hiou and gari'ou, for


use where more than two such members are intended.

CASE.

The cases of Breton nouns are undeclined, and must


be determined
1. By the position of the noun in the sentence.
2. Or, by the article which precedes it, for which
see Article, p. 18.

NOTES ON THE POSITION OF THE BRETON NOUN.

I. The subject usually precedes the verb, but when


it cedes its
particular objective emphasis is required,
precedence to the object of the sentence.
II. The subject of the sentence is often placed after
a neuter verb.
III. The latter of two nouns in collocation is in the

genitive case.
TO BRETON GRAMMAR. 55

CHAPTER VIII.

THE ADJECTIVE.
I. The Breton adjective is a far more simple part of
speech than its elaborate Gaelic equivalent of four de-
clensions, more simple even than the Welsh adjective,
inasmuch asadmits of no change to vary its mean-
it

ing in the matter either of gender, number, or case. It

closely follows the noun which it qualifies, in position


and mutation:
Ar mab mad Ar mipien mad
The good son The good sons
Eur verc'h mad a garo he mamm mad
A good daughter will love her good mother
II. There are but three degrees of comparison in the
Breton adjective, as against the four well defined
degrees ofWelsh grammarians. Ordinarily these are
formed by the addition of oJh to the positive for the
comparative degree, and the addition of a to the posi-
tive (whichis preceded
by the definite article) for the
superlative degree: except
(1) Mad (good); compar., gvvell; superL, ar gwella.
Drouk (bad); compar., gwaz; super., ar gwasa.
(2) Adjectives ending in o change the o into v for
the stem letter of comparative and superlative
degree, and then proceed according to rule:
Teo (fat); compar., tevoc'h; superl., ann teva.
AN INTRODUCTION

(3) Adjectives ending in z change the z into s for


the stem letter of comparative and superlative
degree, and then proceed according to rule:
Braz (great] brasoc'h ar vrasa.
; ;

There is also a use which recognizes the adverb meur-


bed (Welsh, mawr byd\ immense, also the adjective
braz, great, as qualifying other adjectives and adverbs
superlatively.
NUMERALS.

No.
TO BRETON GRAMMAR. 57

No.
AN INTRODUCTION

NOTES ON THE BRETON ADJECTIVE.


I. The Adjective almost invariably follows the
noun it qualifies, according to customary Celtic usage.
Except /, after the adjective koz (old), where as
with its Welsh and Irish equivalents hen and
scan it precedes the qualified noun.*
//. Adjectives of comparative and superlative
degree frequently precede the qualified noun.
II. Numerical Adjectives, when cardinal, govern a
singular noun.

*
This is also true of the following adjectives: gwell (bad),
hevelep (similar}, gour (small), berr (short), briz (mixed), bihan
(little), dister (of little value), gwez (wild), gwtr (true),
hir (long),
nevez (new), holl (all), pell (far), and a few others.
TO BRETON GRAMMAR. 59

CHAPTER IX.

THE ADVERB.
Of this part of Breton speech it will be necessary
to say but little. The usual distinctions made by
grammarians of time, place, and manner are appli-
cable here also. The position of the adverb is as near
the beginning of the sentence as possible.
I. As in Welsh so in Breton, there are a number
of compounded adverbs in addition to the simple forms
common to all languages. Of this class are ouc'h-penn
= Welsh, uwch-ben] rak-tal= Welsh, rhag-llaw, and
very many others.
The
II. usual method of compounding an
'
adverb
of manner '
to take the cognate adjective, and to
is

cause either the particle ez, or the preposition gant


to precede that adjective (cf. Welsh, yn adverbial;
}

English, suffix -fy- Gaelic, air, gu, do).


III. Some adverbs are compared according to the
rule given for the comparison of adjectives, other ir-

regularly.
IV. Adverb of affirmation and negation, ia, yes;
nann, no. But direct affirmation or negation is very
rare.
6o AN INTRODUCTION

CHAPTER X.

THE PREPOSITION.
As the preposition enters extensively into composi-
tion both in its simple and compound form a list

of the principal prepositions with their meanings in

English is here given.


All Breton Prepositions but da and compounds of
da (which govern the dative article) are said to govern
' '
the Objective case

a
TO BRETON GRAMMAR. 6l

rag-enep-da face-to-face war-dro-da around


with war-c'horre upon the face
rak-tal-da in the face of of
war on, upon
1

war-lerc'h behind

The preposition enn, el, er(in), is governed in form

by the same conditions as apply to the forms of the


article (q.v.).

CONJUNCTIONS.
The following are the conjunctions of most common
occurence:

arre again er-vad*


62 AN INTRODUCTION

CHAPTER XI.

THE MUTATIONS.
GENERAL OBSERVATIONS.

Thefollowing is the table upon which the whole


process of mutation is founded:
TO BRETON GRAMMAR. 63

AS COMPARED WITH CORNISH.

Radical.
64 AN INTRODUCTION

I. A glance at the above tables will show us that


there a recognized and well-defined system of
is

strengthening the mutation of the third degree (called


1

provection ') of the sonants G, B, D, in the Breton


language, which is exceptional in Cornish and un-

known Welsh.*in
II. The mutated forms of surd letters K, P, T, re-
main practically the same in all these languages (for
explanation of apparent variation see letters in question
in alphabet, Chapter I.), and in doing so bear witness
to the Aryan origin of the Celtic languages wherein
the tenues give place consistently to mediae, and the
mediae to aspiratae; (Gutturales) *, y, x; (Labiales)
TT, , <; (Linguales) T, 8, 0.

III. The mutated forms of sonant letters G, B, D,


display slight variety in the matter of the middle form
of the guttural G only. The middle Breton form of
this letter is more persistent than in Cornish or Welsh,
for the mutation c'/z is adhered to where the other

languages adopt minus g. There is no reversion to


the original radical form as in Cornish, but in its place
we find the sonant form becoming surd, as already
noticed.
IV. the liquid letters, the labial
Of is the only M
persistent one throughout these three languages, re-
ceiving its common mutation V. The mutated form
of the sibilant S would appear to be peculiar to Breton,
though Mr. Norris notices one instance of a similar
change in Cornish. The same high authority also

*
We now speak only of initial mutation.
TO BRETON GRAMMAR. 65

quotes a late Cornish mutation recorded by Lhuyd of


the labio-dental into F V
(fordh, 'a way/ becoming
an vordh, the way '), as well as a mutation of the
'

third degree where floh, becomes a*n


'
a child,' hloh,
'
of the child.'* This fact will not be without
interest to the Gael, who, recollecting the similarity
which exists between his own aspirated surds and
' '

sonants and the mutations of the Brython, will further


trace the analogy between the remainder of his aspi-
rated consonants M, S, and F
(Mh, Sh, Fh), and those
recorded above and doing so, will realize the complete
;

harmony which exists throughout on that linguistic


peculiarity which differentiates their common Celtic
language from all other languages in the world.
V. The Gutturo-labial compound KW
has been
reserved for separate consideration. One would have
placed this compound subsecutive to the surd class had
it not been for a passage which occurs in Prof.
Rhys'
treatise on 'Manx Phonology.' Upon p. 162 of that
work he says (in speaking of the distinctions of Manx
speech which entitle it to rank as a language apart
from Scotch and Irish Gaelic as opposed to a mere
dialect of that language) Manx may justly pride
:
*

itself on being the only Celtic language to


preserve
instances of the ancient combination qu {i.e., qua, qu ' '

(=k), not
*' (=k)], they are however not considerable
in number.' t Now, moved by this remark from so great

*
Norris* Cornish Drama, p. 227.

f In view of this statement, the writer was at first disposed to

regard that large class of Welsh vocables beginning with this com-
bination as resolving its second element into a pure vowel. But he

5
66 AX INTRODUCTION

an authority the greatest living authority, one might


say it is due to the Breton language to place on
record its fidelity to the ancient Celtic sound, in its

3rd (provective) mutation of the compound GW. We


also have in Cornish the compound appearing in its
radical form in such words as cwcth (Welsh, gwisg,
where attrition is manifest), a garment,' and kwilken
(

(no congenerous vocable in Welsh) 'a frog.' But there


are a number of indisputable cases of its unequivocal
use as a Breton radical.
The modern and deplorable practice of assimilating
Breton to French orthography, has led in many in-
stances to discarding the letter K in favour of Qu; dis-
crimination is therefore needed in deciding as to the
originality of the compound.

is assured that in a large number of cases this view is wholly un-


tenable. There are two undoubted instances of loan-words among
'

such, both of which the Latin had a genius for imparting, cweryl
'

(Lat., querela; Fr., querelle; Span., querella; Ital., querela; but


Gaelic, connsaick): and 'cwarel* (Norman-French, quarricr; Fr.,
carrier e, &c.; but Gaelic, tochail}. Of the rest; in some, such as
cwato, cwarel (synonomous with O.E., quarrel=a </a/Y), cwali,
cwaran, and cwympo, where a vowel immediately follows the com-
bination, the two elements must be unisonant with that vowel ;

in the remainder, the second element is naturally a self-contained


'

vowel. One suspects that the word '


Celtic in the above passage
'
is a lapsus calami for Gaelic.'
TO BRETON GRAMMAR. 6j

CHAPTER XII.

I.

SYNTACTICAL MUTATIONS.
In connection with the gender of the noun substan-
tive, the following mutations are made:

A. All feminine nouns, preceded by the definite


or indefinite article, mutate their initial to
the second degree, where that initial letter
is subject to mutation.

B. EXCEPT those in D, which remain firm.


C. All masculine nouns, preceded by the definite
or indefinite article, remain firm.
D. EXCEPT (a) those in K, which mutate to the
third degree, and (b) those in S followed by
a vowel, which mutate to the second degree.
EXEMPLA
Feminine Nouns.
A. Bag boat ar vag, eur vag
Kazek mare ar gasek, eur gasek

Greg wife ar c'hreg, eur c'hreg


Gwazien vein ar wazien, eur waz-
ien
Mamm mother ar vamm, eur vamm
Pennaouerez gleaner ar bennaouerez, eur
bennaouerez
68 AN INTRODUCTION

Tors loaf of arm dors, eunn dors


bread
Sae robe
B. but, Dereadegez modesty

c.
TO BRETON GRAMMAR. 69

3. The same pronoun of the Third Person Singular,

Masculine, he, subjects all mutable initials to mutation


to the Second Degree. But the Feminine Pronoun
of the Third Person, he, subjects only surd initials to
mutation to the Third Degree: he garet, he c'haret.
4. The same pronoun of the First Person Plural,

hor, subjects only the surd letter k to mutation to the


Third Degree: hor c'haret.
5. The same pronoun of the Second Person Plural,

hd, mutates only sonants to surds, by provection: ho


karet.
6. But the same pronoun of the Third Person
Plural, ho, mutates only surds to the Third Degree:
ho c'haret. In cases where the second and third
person plural would be otherwise indistinguishable,
the terminal insistant hu may be added to the verb to
indicate the second person.

III.

MUTATIONS IN RESPECT OF THE POSSESSIVE PRONOUN.

1 . The possessive pronoun of the First Person


Singular, ma, mutates only surd letters to the Third

Degree: ma c'her, my home (ker).


2. The possessive
pronoun of the Second Person
Singular, da, mutates all mutable letters to the Second
Degree: da ger, thy home.
3. The masculine possessive pronoun of the Third
Person Singular, he, mutates all mutable letters to the
Second Degree: he ger, his home.
7O AN INTRODUCTION

4. The feminine possessive pronoun of the Third


Person, he, mutates only surd letters to the Third

Degree: he c'her, her home.


5. The possessive pronoun of the First Person
Plural, hor, mutates only the surd letter k to the
Third Degree: hor c'her, our home.
6. The possessive pronoun of the Second Person

Plural, ho, mutates only sonants to surds by provec-


tion ho ker, your home.
:

But the possessive pronoun of the Third Person


7.

Plural, ho, mutates only surds to the Third Degree: ho


c'her, their home.

IV.

OTHER MUTATIONS.

1. The present participle of the verb is subjected to

mutation by the 6 precedent, to the following degree


B to V, D to T, G to C'H, GW
to W, and to V. M
2. The same mutations hold good after c ('that')

when preceding the future tense indicative, and ma


mood and second optative.
before the subjunctive
3. The second numeral daou and diou govern all
mutable nouns in the second degree. The third
numeral tri and teir governs the surds in the third
degree, and mutates s to z. The same applies to the
fourth and ninth numeral, pc'var and peder, nao. The
fifth numeral pemp governs the sonants B and G and

the hybrid GW in provective degree.


TO BRETON GRAMMAR. 7 1

adverbs, and
' '

4. Certain prepositions, particles


govern nouns, adjectives, and verbs in varying degree.
5. A
few nouns, firm in the singular, are mutated
in the pluralwhen defined by the article, and vice
versa. The former are chiefly of masculine gender,
the latter feminine.
6. Compounded words of two substantives, whether
proper or common, mutate the second moiety.
A tendency exists in Breton, for purposes of perfect

euphony (which may already have been observed in


the conjugation of the compound verb), to terminal
mutation, where the surd letter is always liable to
yieldplace to its sonant in order to preserve the

'rhythm' of the sentence: Kare^/ ounn for Kare/


ounn. See also changes in the Article.
72 AN INTRODUCTION

CHAPTER XIII.

PROVECTION, &c.

Speaking of the process of phonetic decay, which to


a greater or less extent must exert its influence upon

every language, Prof. Whitney says that in their in-


ception these changes amount to inaccuracies of speech.
They attest the influence of that immense numerical
'

majority who do not take sufficient pains to speak cor-


rectly, but whose blunders become finally the norm of
the language. They are mainly the result of two ten-
dencies, the first of which is to make things easy to
our organs of speech.'* As, who would say kmght,
/sa/m, fora:<2S/le, toward, when the meaning is ade-

quately conveyed by nit, sam, fo'c'sle, to'ard; or who


would willingly revert to eAe^/xoo-vvr;, when by judicious
exercise of phonetic economy he may make his mean-

ing clear by the employment of but four elementary


sounds atms, and even then, in speech at least, might
dispense with one more of that attenuated number ?
To-day the purist in linguistry debates within him-
' '

self as to how far he may legitimately go with the


' '

popular change, objecting his cannot to can't/ his


'

'often' to 'of'n'; the 'purist' of to-morrow, convicted


'
of pedantry, will utter his couldn't and wouldn't
' ' '

as readily as he writes his '


honor '
and '
color.'

*
Language, and the Study of Languages,'
'
p. 28, sq.
TO BRETON GRAMMAR. 73

In a footnote on p. 48, dealing with this question of


phonetic change, it was observed that two processes
were at work in the Breton language. The one was
'

disintegrating process alluded to in the para-


'
the
graph above, and from which destructive agency the
Breton language is by no means free. But further
than that; in this same direction no family of speech
has gone further than the Celtic, none has so success-
fully attempted the task of rendering its language one
of euphonic harmony and uninterrupted
perfect
fluence,and of this there is abundance of evidence in
the system of mutation alluded to as the common de-
'

nominator of Celtic speech.' In harmony with this


law, we find an elaborate yet natural system, whereby
tenues give place to their mediae, mediae to their
conduce to this fluence. If it be
aspiratae, in order to
growth and change make the life of a lan-
'
true that
guage, as they are everywhere else the inseparable
accompaniment and sign of life,'* then indeed are the
Celtic languages in happy case !

The second process which we observe at work is


a directly reconstructive one, and makes in an opposite
' '

direction to that just noticed, and is frequently alluded


to in the foregoing pages as Projection, The word
used in this connection appears to owe its origin to
Zeuss, in whose Grammatica Celtica (Vol. I. pp. 132
' '

146) the subject is treated extensively, though not


exhaustively. A
definition has already been afforded
and its principles have been seen in operation, but it is

*
Whitney, Ibid. p. 32.
74 AN INTRODUCTION

due to the reader that some explanation should be


offered of that which is claimed on behalf of the Breton

language (or perhaps one should say, inclusively, of


the Brythonic variants of Celtic). The claim advanced
was, that it formed the exception to the general prin-
'
l

ciple of literal decadence the reason for which has


been supplied above which is so distinguishing a
feature in the language of the Indo-European family.
The peoples speaking their own variant of the
primitive Aryan language, and
developing as it

occasion offers, stand in marked contrast to those by


whom they find themselves surrounded, for in the
'agglutinating' languages spoken by these latter, there
is,alas with the single and notable exception of
!

Magyar and possibly Suomi, little occasion for de-


velopment. And were it not so, the entire conditions
and traditions of the language are against it, for the
'

rigid working of the law of umlaut


*
so necessary a
condition of their existence forbids any departure
from constitutional (literary) usage. Now this law of
'
umlaut or vocalic sequence is no new thing to that
'

northern branch of the Celtic race, who, striving after


Celtic fluence, have formulated for themselves the rule,
caol le caol agus leathan le Icathan. Though this
canon of Gaelic grammarians burdens the orthography
of the language, it is difficult to see how, short of the
introduction of the consonantal signs of the Devan-
agari, it is to be avoided, for when two words enter
into actual composition with one another, the second
in order has to be so far modified if needs be that
its vowel sounds often abpear to undergo a complete
TO BRETON GRAMMAR. 75

change, when as a matter of fact the only sound modi-


fied is the intervening consonant. Something of the
same kind the apotheosis of the consonant
'
seems '

to have obtained outside of the Aryan group, else how


shallwe account for the late introduction of the vowel
point in Hebrew (e.g.] amongst the Semitic languages,
or the loose vocalic distribution in the Old Magyar
'
documents of the twelfth century, amongst the Scyth-
ian
'

languages ? Our forefathers lightly regarded the


vowel in Cornish, as those acquainted with the Cornish
'

literary remains are well aware, and it was to the apoth-


eosis of the vowel,' amongst other things, that the
death of the Cornish language as a spoken tongue must
be largely attributed In so far, then, as the principle
!

of '
umlaut '
finds inclusion in the Celtic tongues and
its extent is surely as great in these as in Latin and
Attic Greek it has conduced to the better
preserva-
tion of the language.
In order to this better preservation is the principle
of provection also, for by this process sonants which
stood peculiarly liable from their position to lose their
distinctive sound, are hardened into surds. Thus in
Welsh we have

Te,- teced tecach tecaf

Gwly3 gwly/ed gwly/ach gwly/af


rha/ed rha/ach rha/af

This, by itself, does not appear to take us very far,


but as far as it
goesit is a
recognition of the principle.
In Cornish we go very much further, and discover that
there are certain words which exercise the power of
7<> AN INTRODUCTION

provection over others. Thus,


'
ow /ybbry (for ow T k

debbry '=catt'ng),
'
ow ^erthe '
ow guerthe'=j*//-
('

*'), 'ow pewe


'

(ow bewe=//'i7//^ );
r
'mar kruge '

(gruge=*/Vdfo), mar pyth w/7/ &?), mar


' ' '

(byth, //"&?
'

(gallo =if he can)]


' '
callo mai,' that\ yn,' apposition
(yn ta=w^//); and 4

maga/ equally, seems to have


possessed this power in some stages of the language.
Sufficient has been said in the foregoing chapter on
Mutation and elsewhere to demonstrate the very com-
plete hold, euphonically and syntactically, which pro-
vection acquired over the Breton language, which
renders further explanation of its operation unnecessary.
Unlike the Welsh, the Breton use of provection seems
rather to lie in the syntactical direction of genderal and
numerical significance, though it is no stranger to the
purely phonetic use of the Welsh. On the other
hand, it is unlike the Euskarian (and Esthonian) use
of provection which changes sonants to surds sporadi-

cally, and then only upon condition of their following


the letter r, the sibilants, or a vowel in composition.
[In this connection it is interesting to note that
Armoric phonetics are evolved on a closely parallel

plane to the Greek. The pure sibilant 2av, early gives


place to the palato-dental sibilant Z^ra, as representing
the Hebrew y (Tsadhe) or Syriac Tsode, which is
almost the value of the Irish slender b (d) and English
d in^/uty. At
a later stage of the Greek language, 8, 0,

approximate to sibilant (r, for which we actually find


them substituted. This depravation goes unchecked,
until at a late period of Attic Greek, the original form
in sheer self-defence asserts itself once more, and the
TO BRETON GRAMMAR. 77

moribund and impotent diplasiasm era- reverts to TT.


The Doric 0-105 for 0eo's records the nadir of Greek
phonetic decadence, and points the fact that in pro-
vection alone, if anywhere, is salvation from linguistic

perdition; though even the change back to sonant form


of the h, th, and f
(the eviscerated Teutonic form of
the proto-Aryan k, t, p), came too late to save the
Gothic Language from extinction in the 9th Century.
The same causes rendered the autochthonous languages
of Germany, easily patient of subjection to one domi-
nant idiom, when circumstances, first of all literary
and ecclesiastical, and finally political, demanded the
sacrifice of vernacular speech on the altar of Imperial-
ism].
Foremost amongst the forces of disintegration at
work on the Breton language is arraigned the dire
influence of a population on its borders Gallic in

language and ante-Breton in sympathy, and in this


fact must be sought the explanation of the further fact,
'

that
'
are rapidly eating the heart out of
Gallicisms
the Breton language. Here there is no buffer-state ' '

to oppose itself to the powerful political and literary


influence of the French nation, and the absence of such

territory renders the future of this


interesting old
language precarious indeed, whilst the existence of such
a territory has proved the salvation of languages whose
liveshave been threatened. Notably is this the case
with Basque, which abutts on to both French and
Spanish territory. M. Broca has pointed out that in
'

Spain, Basque comes into collision with Spanish on its


border under conditions of such inferiority as to render
78 AN INTRODUCTION TO BRETON GRAMMAR.

inevitable the gradual encroachment of Spanish. But


in France, the dialect hemming-in the Basque is not,
like the Spanish, an official, administrative, political,
and literary language. It is not French, it is an old
patois (Gascon)which is actually dying out. There is
no good reason why such a dialect should supplant the
Basque, or Basque encroach on it. Both are weak and
threatened with absorption sooner or later by the
French.' This last sentence is prophecy, that which
precedes it is fact, as anyone may discover for himself
by comparing the prevalence and purity of the Basque
dialects (the Guipuzcoan and Biscayan), situated within

Spanish territory, with those (the Labourdin and Soul-


etin) in French territory.
APPENDICES.
So AN INTRODUCTION

6
oo
c

r:
X
00

w i i.
o

o 1
o ?
W "^ Jr
is
g
!-

!
& -
8-g
W "^

=
E

w 11 -.H
B

-e - *r a -t-
TO BRETON GRAMMAR. 8l

<u
J2 a' * I
T3 erys s C T3 esens

Q ^ SO
rt
C ebren,

*-O a
2^ bJO

'2
rt

an
|.c '

g >
^
OS
-C
t3 at-
c o >
y*n
gw
,
i dan
dowrow

<n
rt^ o
ew
De
en
^1>>
t
P*^
S
H c
-Q ebre ^1-
S so
O J3 yn
h
an

-O ^ oJ
c
c
E w
ffi
.<"!
Ha s" I W 2 se
o
l S
Ifli
.
dhens
RJ 3 a" ^ t^

Its -
By S^ <u
^H t, T3

bJO
P *

o _p
"^^ Q

I III Z 8
CS C
'"
^ -T S o$
ro
N
o$
C
oS
C VD
.2' S bo C S
P ^D !a
<u
Q 51^
0^ -b bX) 3- T3 nS bJD

n W c K oJ O
j-
rt M 't3 .0
'a
c S '*^ J=
*~
N
^
J
N W) 3 10 W) vrc

CTj ^J3
I r
o
I o$ oS o$ I I &
a^ 1
^S ^^
.
-5
o>
i
0$
1- 1
-
^
^3C
o$ J3 T3 T3
13 T3 T3
'g
^ OJ S * * g
T3 ^ ^ rt _, S ^
rt - ^, t

.^ T3 3
CT3 O rQ C
i
S rt

.-H "*

^! oj a ^
82 AN INTRODUCTION

1
SI ?
C fa

^ c *S -^JS
i t<*
,0
^ O 5 z - 2
2 o Q 5
"^ X PS
S PS C,
S *& if a
y P3
c
3
^2$
_E o 1
2
j
Q
N i

PS *r
> PS S1

ft
PS u 3 N
JZ * o &&
^
8 S -C be
3 J2
05 1?
^
^
o
3
Q
||-r
rt
j.

bjo
c
Q-
Q
PH ^ ^ PS
^ 5 <2
C/3 pS

o =r
oo c
C
o3
PS
,
^ ^O S ^ is
g PS T3 ^2 ^S -^ ^
> ^^ c 'c5

^ B
ill
x^b a
" B*> ^ 'V
8 PS

g'--
*
*15
^ ^ ^
^
-n
k
-JJ.
^^ a a
.

111 fe
^
Jf =
*\
9
-S x
.

00
13
*
cr -a
*
Ht ^^
J***

>
*^\ H*: O '<

1 .
-C3
O O
^3 vj
5!
^>
"3
TO BRETON GRAMMAR. 83
X 8 rt bjo .2 C J3

r-?
c g bc ^
Q ^ C
=
*Mi c J2
"rt ,-
C
^5
ctf

Br
bC ^
r
bJO 3 g oJ

giv
he aim
a.f- 3.s
dcvezo

lavarez
oe.
glazeur war
ho
a had, s
frouez,

douar
e
Doue g ge
ho-unan
evel-se

ou enn,pere
aim
ho hag
Ha , gw
6 en
raid ho
ii.

3 <0 SS '0 C
Ra icot
frouez
vez had douar:

'
,

* s ^
3 *

O
J3
m nit-
84 AN INTRODUCTION

" "

M " .

I; X^g. i

3 TO D C
O 3 rt

a ** "^ ^ ^ * '
^ v-
-"J^ ~<o r"' rtf
3
_
H 2 .5* m

i
*
i ^ st s s
'
X
5 S
TO BRP:TON GRAMMAR. 85

r^ *jii
Q.J KL K* *^ p*
?!
Q.) j"~
iiifi
^
^^ *x
?
*^

^
i"Eo 1 | ^i^|^!^>
^on-S^^M^ ^ ?J
^
-*
o
J? 5 -3
Z J3

u
g
g^^.-o^g^s^c
*H
I ^
Q^^ ^ S^ ^^(S **^
^i^ -*-^ _* _ hjo
_^r' K!-~ ~*
?>**
*

c 1 SB
.fix^s^
K
J>:
"^ - ^
J 2 ^
'

2
s ^ ^ S,
I!
w v^

,0
CD
jji^^pscIS"^
n3 *& ^ PS
;
^ ^
c? -^\
a
SVQ
^
^j

N
OS

1
bO

1
D

bo
PS

tt

S
?o '^^
-a
^^ ^
<: ^ s
86 AN INTRODUCTION

fs|
Cu
a ^ X o jC -
2 -'?
" ~

CT ?^^
-3 o>
-{tfk-CJr'-C;*.!*
>>ur;(3D? '^' o-
6
^
r^O)
t/3

re^><u
5
;

v " w
^ -t-'aj~7'^55 (U
<j$
v
*?" oo

*" ~^
o ^
e W
*j Tt-

I
iii||l f|ll | |i
^ *
"

^^ ^ ^ ^^
N en c~ 7^ v( ^ 'S

C
o
X^^
w o
O
t:
^
'

re
3S
J3-o
S
?s I
P
V S>> .
- 1

!
u
^ i
- -

:>,-!~^ h-.^^ 3
Q
TO BRETON GRAMMAR.
88 AN INTRODUCTION

N <U C N
"* ,C C rt .

O C .Q W "*
,g g f *0 K k
&>| j s-c g-l'.-S 1 I
*
v " "Z *a^^Q$;J|
z
p "^
^ <: .s *> >*g c O- *
*
II
** *^

iic $ ipitiMi?
^
^c jQ^^ <c 5 ^ s 55

*Of-S a *
< ?i
_^ CTjJrtv- |

^j~ .
jj
3
x i b
^
u ^%^J3N 2
--0-^S^^
JC -5 * ^ V
^
52

8 2 ^ ^
-- oc
3
W S
oc'
-S *

g|| 1 .S)J8 ||1| |


cbeQ be CTJ-^^^-SS
>< ^2 J v
'
T3^-vlT>^ J,^i'Ji
^ % 1^5 >
*S -^1 ^
8 Jj I
&
z -s t. t fr^ &.8

S*>8/8 >. .li


l-Sl <l

s> l^iy ^
^ !*Siit5*fO
s-Ss^^^-'^l' ^ 5

*
*,
>i *r
%
^
"^^^J^
^-r; ^
ati
^ "

S^^"S ^^s^^a^^^-^^-^^
i .8 ^ fe : Si

I &ir*SiPfr^^Sai^iffc^
lllff
- ^BLiSl-lli^* ^1
w
|-
^Sr^^i'^: ^lcl*.l|fllll
>%^>%CJ Ta^SSe-S ^
1
TO BRETON GRAMMAR. 89

o 5
^s
g 6 *s
^ ^j

^
"C^ ?2
It
<2
v. = ***
W 0*5 ^ ^ i:
Q I -a
rN ^^ ^ I Q
si"
1^
be
^T - ^ k
s=L ..

V
||
'
S Si

x5 ft ?S

S s^
be
I C **
Q "^

* j-l
I

3
k
<s
*T3 i
^
l-i I
I d> **

i
s
I* <v,
1 '

^
s
3| 3 -^ S 1
^ Si ~
;g *
*S
^
g>
.
*
<s
^
?K C*
i
1< ON
i
5s

a
N
|f
^ ?N -= -
8 i
^
9o AN INTRODUCTION
rt
- C
- T3

-3 E

,
p !
**
L! ,^t (1)

be ^-5 t|
** o-' --S
be
I G C
S S 43 O

w be .-
J^ 5

W)

111
2
'O
T3 O
U ^
c o u -a
bJO >^~aJ >,
'cri C ^

S ''] !* 8
^ -S ^ >

- jst-S
>* >.
a>
-3
"
c _^ 3"
TO BRETON GRAMMAR.
02 AN INTRODUCTION

if 1U s
*
'=* *3 * * "*

|" 5" 8-cr ^g S^ -a-g


rt -s
<u e .s
c -S
-IIa
*Q
^2 U- .

_
2be -gi
x!
_^
J: c g =T ^ _ ^ ^ ^

6 ^ i
^ '
^
'^ I I "1 e'
^"^" f
2 J*|
! fc
"O "8
c ^ 'g -a.2.5 g
^
A "5 a rt
jf .=J S 'C
^r
x : 'g

s=|f.s- si saj'| ,
sl<S .si
D C
-
5
11g M - *
s ::, ro fc-

\. *T > s p NU
^
g I g | -s, I -s. I * ft I- g -g :
-
B H J' 5 g" ^ S" = Sj ^ j, . fe

I I lie- ?'=
w j
.Ss-eS^u-al
Q D
'

3
**
TT
H o 3
- "-i JS C \d T -S
-^^J-^2 r^.
1
CN <u W
oo
'55 i:^^ q> -fc 15 O QOJ

*
3 i c' g bb S-2
s 5
ti s"
g^^-.cg
.
1*11*
N-^bi)c
i-i
1-2
e ? & e N N on
Vi <u
3 N _ -^
i ^ c o So 3 go S
^-:-6aj'tf5 c
a>a>-^^rt ? o

1I
odglj^c^c
c/j ^ ^j
6

^
.^^ QJ D
lila-tf
bccc L, O O .g
T3
i:
fl

p=J3jo* )
'aesf.r ^5 15 "C *JC c
^ ^u
c 2 5
a ^ o
! *pT .-, 'S 'S 2 ...o
^ ^
;
^3088^55
I 2
^^^"15
5 *
cf
5 -S -S -ff
*
g .
t

Cu*J bCo ^^ ^r^*!)^ <uc


o)-i->o_cCi-'L. <u ^-c^j.c uis'
v

ffi^K
J<
3g w WS -
^ Q Q^O
"^^ -u- c c .S^.o_.g^.
3^> B """? 2 ^ *^
rt

^1)
^ ^
N.
"Jn O
^2
b3
a S
J5
2 g
.2 -o co
P-
-a U x
TO BRETON GRAMMAR. 93
CARMARTHEN:
PRINTED BY W. SPURRELL AND SON..
University of Toronto

Library

DO NOT
O
CO
m REMOVE
THE
CARD
FROM
THIS
POCKET

Acme Library Card Pocket


Under 1
Pat. "Ref. Index File .'

Made by LIBRARY BUREAU

You might also like