Introduction To Water Supply Engineering
Introduction To Water Supply Engineering
Introduction To Water Supply Engineering
ENGINEERING
PROVIDING WATER
TO A THIRSTY SOUL IS
GODLY
ANYBODY WHO CAN SOLVE THE PROBLEMS OF
WATER WILL BE WORTHY OF TWO NOBLE PRIZES –
ONE FOR PEACE AND ONE FOR SCIENCE – J F K
1
2
3
Distribution of water
Available Drinkable 1%
4% Available In India
Ocean Drinkable % Populataion Dependent?
97% 3%
79% 1% 20%
1871-67 56 Khadakwasla 26 30
1968 294 / 350 Panshet 30 320
1971 241 / 591 Pawana 58 533
1981 591 - 104 487
1991 362 / 953 Warasgaon 292 661
2001 953 - 448 505
2011 64 /1017 Temghar 620 397
2021 1017 - 949 68
2031 1017 - ? ?
Reuse of polluted river water in UBB
13
COLLECTION AND PUMPING OF RAW
WATER
• TYPES OF INTAKES:
– SUBMERGED INTAKE OR LAKE INTAKE
– EXPOSED INTAKES:
• CANAL INTAKE
• RESERVOIR INTAKE
• RIVER INTAKE (A) WET INTAKE TOWER (B)
DRY INTAKE TOWER
• MOVABLE INTAKE
14
Intake Well
15
Intake Well
16
Jack Well
17
Intake and Jack Well
18
Inside view of Jack well
19
Completed Jack well
20
BASIC DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS AND
DATA COLLECTION:
• AREA & POPULATION TO BE SERVED,
• DESIGN PERIOD,
• PER CAPITA W S,
• OTHER WATER NEEDS IN THE AREA
(INDUSTRIAL, FIRE FIGHTING ETC.),
TREATMENT FACILITIES AVAILABLE
(CENTRALISED OR DE-CENTRALISED
21
BASIC DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS AND DATA
COLLECTION:
• AREA & POPULATION TO BE SERVED:
– PRESENT AREA OF THE CITY; LIKELY FUTURE EXPANSION
– POPULATION: PRESENT, LIKELY FUTURE (AS PER CHANGE IN
TREND)
• POPULATION FORECASTING USING VARIOUS METHODS
• DESIGN PERIOD AND FACTORS AFFECTING THE SAME
– NORMALLY WS PROJECTS: DESIGNED FOR MEETING
REQUIREMENTS OVER 30 YEARS PERIOD (AFTER COMPLETION)
1 STORAGE BY DAMS 50
2 INFILTRATION WORKS 30
3 PUMPING
P. H. (CIVIL WORK) 30
ELECTRICAL MOTORS AND 15
PUMPS
24
SURFACE SOURCES OF W S SCHEMES
25
PONDS & LAKES AS SURFACE SOURCES OF
WS
• POND / LAKE: NATURAL DEPRESSION FORMED WITHIN
EARTH’S SURFACE. (SMALL SIZE DEPRESSION: POND; LARGE
SIZE DEPRESSION: LAKE)
– KATRAJ LAKE (OLDEST W S SCHEME IN PUNE)
– VAITARANA, MODAK SAGAR, TANSA FOR MUMBAI
• EACH LAKE HAS ITS OWN DRAINAGE DISTRICT /
CATCHMENT AREA.
• WATER QUALITY IS NORMALLY GOOD SELF PURIFICATION
MECHANISMS HELP FOR MAINTAINING QUALITY BUT….
• MANMADE ACTIVITIES POLLUTE THE LAKES
• QUANTITY: NORMALLY SMALL, DEPENDS UPON CATCHMENT
AREA, RAINFALL
• LAKES: NOT SUITABLE FOR CITY W S HOWEVER VERY
USEFUL FOR SMALL TOWNS / VILLAGES.
26
27
28
STREAMS AND RIVERS AS SOURCES OF
WS
• STREAMS:
– FEED WATER TO LAKES / RESERVOIRS
– SMALL QUANTITY AVAILABLE; DRY UP IN SUMMER; HENCE
NOT VERY POPULAR
– USED IN VILLAGES; ESPECIALLY IN HILLY AREAS
• RIVERS:
– MOST IMPORTANT SOURCES OF W S SCHEMES.
– SINCE ANCIENT TIMES’ SETTLEMENTS HAVE TAKEN
PLACE AROUND RIVERS
– PERENNIAL / NON-PERENNIAL RIVERS
– N E INDIA: MELTING OF ICE- PERENNIAL RIVERS.
– WATER QUALITY: NOT VERY RELIABLE, HIGH SILT
CONTENT, SAND AND SUSPENDED MATTER; CITY
SEWAGE HAMPERS THE D /S USERS
29
30
STORAGE RESERVOIRS AS SURFACE
SOURCES OF W S
• DAM ON THE RIVER – A CONSTRUCTED
BARRIER, CREATES WATER IMPOUNDING –
STORAGE RESERVOIR.
• NOW A DAYS, MULTI PURPOSE
RESERVOIRS ARE PLANNED
– DOMESTIC W S , INDUSTRIAL W S,
AGRICULTURE USE, HYDROPOWER.
31
LAYOUT SCHEME FOR DAM AS
SOURCE OF WS – PUNE CITY
32
33
UNDERGROUND WATER SOURCES
34
RAW WATER TRANSMISSION
36
CONVEYANCE OF WATER FROM
SOURCE TO W T P BY PUMPING
37
38
DIFFERENT TYPES OF PIPES USED
• PIPELINES – MAJOR INVESTMENT IN W S
PROJECTS. HENCE SELECTION OF APPROPRIATE
MATERIAL IS VERY CRUCIAL.
• POINTS TO BE CONSIDERED FOR SELECTION OF
PIPE MATERIAL:
– DURABILITY; LIFE; COST ASPECTS (INSTALLATION AS
WELL AS O&M)
42
CAST IRON PIPES – SPIGOT & SOCKET
JOINT
43
CAST IRON PIPES – FLANGED JOINT
• FLANGED JOINTS.--------------->
44
CAST IRON PIPES – FLANGED JOINT
• USED AT PLACES WHERE JOINTS ARE
REQUIRED TO BE DISMANTLED - @ PH,
WTP etc.
• FLANGES AT BOTH ENDS ARE PROVIDED
DURING “CASTING” ITSELF.
• FOR STEEL PIPES: FLANGES ARE
SEPARATELY CAST, THEN SCREWED OR
WELDED AT ENDS.
• FLANGES ARE BROUGHT TOGETHER AND
FIXED USING NUTS AND BOLTS WITH
RUBBER PACKING IN BETWEEN
45
CAST IRON PIPES
• MECHANICAL JOINT / DRESSER JOINT
– USED WHEN PLAIN ENDS OF C I PIPES ARE REQUIRED TO
BE JOINED
– IRON RING & GASKET ARE SLIPPED OVER EACH END OF
PIPES, RINGS ARE TIGHTENED USING BOLTS
46
CAST IRON PIPES
• FLEXIBLE JOINT
– USED WHEN LARGE SCALE FLEXIBILITIES ARE
REQUIRED. (PIPES LAID IN RIVERS WITH
UNEVEN BEDS --- MORE SETTLEMENTS LIKELY)
– ON CURVES, JOINT PROVIDED SHALL BE
FLEXIBLE TO REDUCE PROBABILITY OF
BREAKING.
– SPHERICAL SOCKET & SPIGOT WITH BEAD AT
END.
47
CAST IRON PIPES
• EXPANSION JOINT
– PROVIDED AT SUITABLE INTERVALS TO
COUNTER ATTACK THERMAL STRESSES
– SOCKET END IS CAST FLANGED SPIGOT END IS
PLAIN
– ANNULAR RING ATTACHED TO SOCKET END
THAT SLIDES FREELY OVER SPIGOT END.
– SMALL SPACE (= LT* α) IS PROVIDED TO CATER
FOR TEMP. STRESSES & ELONGATIONS.
48
CAST IRON PIPES
• ADVANTAGES:
– MODERATE COST
– EASIER JOINTING
– CORROSION RESISTANT
– LONGER LIFE
– SERVICE CONNECTIONS ARE EASIER
• DISADVANTAGES:
– SUBJECTED TO TUBERCULATION RESULTING INTO @ 50-
70% REDUCTION IN CARRYING CAPACITY
– HEAVIER, HENCE NOT ECONOMICAL BEYOND 120 CM DIA.
– NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PRESSURES > 7 KG / SQ CM
– FRAGILE
49
STEEL PIPES
• #
51
CEMENT CONCRETE PIPES
• PCC : UPTO 0.6 M DIA
• RCC: UPTO 4.5 M AS WELL
• CAN BE PRECAST / CAST IN SITU
• CAST BY:
– BAR + MESH REINFORCEMENT + POURED
CONCRETE, TAMPING
– ROTATING MOULDS USING CENTRIFUGAL
ACTION (SPUN PIPES)
– LINING STEEL MOULDS (INSIDE & OUTSIDE)
WITH CONCRETE – STRONGER THAN FIRST
TWO
52
CONCRETE PIPES
• ADVANTAGES:
– CAN RESIST EXT COMPRESSIVE LOADS; DO NOT
COLLAPSE UNDER NOMINAL VACUUM & TRAFFIC
LOAD.
– NO CORROSION WITH NORMAL POTABLE WATERS
(INSIDE) AND NORMAL SOILS (OUTSIDE)
– QUITE STRONG, USEFUL LIFE 75+ YEARS
– EASY TO CONSTRUCT (ON SITE / IN FACTORIES) WITH
LOCAL INGRADIENTS.
– LOW COEFFICIENT OF EXPANSION, NO EXPANSION
JTS RQUIRED (ESPECIALLY FIOR ABOVE GROUND
LAYING)
– WHEN LAID UNDER WATER: EMPTY PIPES DO NOT
FLOAT DUE TO HEAVY WEIGHTS.
53
CONCRETE PIPES
• DISADVANTAGES:
– ACIDS / ALKALIS / SULPHATES --- ATTACK THE PIPES
EASILY
– DIFFICULT TO REPAIR WHEN DAMAGED
– CAN’T WITHSTAND HIGH PRESSURES.
– HEAVY & BULKY, HENCE DIFFICULT TO TRANSPORT.
– JOINTING / CONNECTION: DIFFICULT
– LEAKAGES DUE TO SHRINKAGE & POROSITY LIKELY.
• JOINTS MAY BE OF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING
TYPES.
I) BANDAGE JOINT
ii) Spigot and socket joint (rigid and semi-flexible)
iii) Collar joint (rigid and semi-flexible)
iv) Flush joint (Internal and external)
• jointing procedures reference may be made to IS 783-1985. 54
55
ASBESTOS CEMENT PIPES
56
ASBESTOS CEMENT PIPES
• ADVANTAGES:
– CORROSION FREE
– HEAT AND FIRE RESISTANT
– 5 METERS IN LENGTH AND SAVES LABOR AND JOINTING
COST
– DURABLE UP TO 100 YEARS AND MORE
– LOW THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY / EXCELLENT INSULATION
– EASY JOINTING
– LOW FRICTION LOSS
– COST EFFECTIVE
– STRONG FOR INTERNAL PRESSURE
– LOW MAINTENANCE
– HIGH CARRYING CAPACITY
– LIGHT WEIGHT
– SMOOTH INTERNAL SURFACE 57
– EXCELLENT IN TROPICAL COUNTRIES.
ASBESTOS CEMENT PIPES
• COSTLY
• LESS STRENGTH, BRITTLE & SOFT. GET DAMAGED BY
EXCAVATING TOOLS / DURING TRANSPORTATION
• NOT SUITABLE FOR PETROLEUM PRODUCTS AS RUBBER
GASKETS GET DAMAGED EASILY
• MISCELLANEOUS TYPES OF PIPES USED:
– WROUGHT IRON
– GI PIPES
– PLASTIC PIPES (COMMONLY KNOWN S PVC
PIPES IN INDIA)
58
PIPE APPURTENANCES: VALVES
59
SLUICE / GATE VALVES
60
SLUICE / GATE VALVES
61
AIR RELIEF VALVES
62
AIR RELIEF VALVES
63
REFLUX VALVES
64
REFLUX VALVES / CHECK VALVES /
NON-RETURN VALVES
• ALLOWS WATER TO FLOW IN ONLY ONE
DIRECTION
• PLACED IN WS LINES GETTING WATER
DIRECTLY BY PUMPING.
• WHEN PUMP STOPS (INTENTIONALLY /
ACCIDENTLY) WATER DOES NOT RUSH
BACK AND PREVENTS DAMAGE.
• PIVOTED PLATE OPENS IN THE DIRECTION
OF FLOW & CLOSES WHEN FLOW TRIES TO
REVERSE.
65
PRESSURE RELIEF VALVES /
AUTOMATIC CUTOFF VALVES / SAFETY
VALVES
66
PRESSURE RELIEF VALVES /
AUTOMATIC CUTOFF VALVES / SAFETY
VALVES
• LOCATED AT SUCH POINTS WHERE
MAX. PR. IN WATER MAIN IS LIKELY TO
BE ACTING.
• WHEN PR > DESIGN PR, VALVE OPENS
AUTOMATICALLY & PR. IS REDUCED.
• EXERCISE: TRY TO FIND PR. RELIEF
VALVE IN ENV ENGG LAB. IF U GET IT
DON’T TELL OTHERS IF U DON’T GET IT
ASK YOUR TEACHER
67
ALTITUDE VALVES
68
ALTITUDE VALVES
• MAINLY USED ON THOSE LINES WHICH
SUPPLY WATER TO ELEVATED TANKS /
STAND PIPES.
• CLOSE AUTOMATICALLY WHEN TANK IS
FULL & OPEN WHEN PRESSURE ON THE
PUMP SIDE IS LESS THAN THAT ON THE
TANK SIDE OF THE VALVE.
69
SCOUR VALVES / BLOW-OFF VALVES /
WASHOUT VALVES
• LOCATED EITHER AT DEAD ENDS / LOWEST
POINTS IN THE W S MAINS
• PROVIDED TO REMOVE SAND / SILT LIKELY
TO GET DEPOSITED IN THE W S PIPELINE.
• MANUALLY OPERATED.
70
WATER QUANTITY REQUIREMENTS
• BASIC NEEDS TO BE SATISFIED BY A PIPED
W S INCLUDE:
– DOMESTIC NEEDS- DRINKING, COOKING,
BATHING, WASHING, FLUSHING OF TOILETS, A/Cs
– INSTITUTIONAL NEEDS
– PUBLIC UTILITIES – STREET WASHING, FLUSHING
OF SEWERS, WATERING IN PUBLIC PARKS
– INDUSTRIAL & COMMERCIAL USES INCLUDING
CENTRAL A/Cs
– FIRE FIGHTING
– REQUIREMENT FOR LIVE STOCK
– MIN PERMISSIBLE UFW (UNACCOUNTED FOR
WATER) --- RECOMMENDED @ 15%; MALAKAPUR
71
<5%
FACTORS AFFECTING WATER DEMAND
• SIZE OF THE CITY:
– LARGER THE SIZE MORE THE CONSUMPTION…
POSSIBLE REASONS?
• LIVING STANDARD & POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS:
– HIGs --- BUNGALOWS– HIGHER WATER CONSUMPTION --- WHY?
– MIG--- FLATS ---- MEDIUM
– LIG --- SLUMS ---- LESS (FACTS?)
• INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE:
– TYPE & NO. OF INDUSTRIES (WITHIN THE CITY), COMMERCIAL
ACTIVITIES (BUSINESS, RETAIL& WHOLESALE MERCANTILE
HOUSES, OFFICE BUILDINGS etc.)
• CLIMATIC CONDITIONS:
– HOT WEATHER: MORE CONSUMPTION THAN COLDER
• WATER METERING:
– METERED WS--- LESS CONSUMPTION THAN FLAT RATE
(EXAMPLE OF MALAKAPUR NAGAR PARISHAD) 72
WS SCHEMES: RECOMMENDED SUPPLY
LEVELS FOR A) DOMESTIC & NONDOMESTIC
NEEDS
SR. CLASSIFICATION OF TOWN / CITY RECOMMENDED
NO. MAX. WS LEVELS
(LPCD)
73
WATER REQUIREMENTS FOR
DOMESTIC PURPOSES
• WATER: REQUIRED FOR BATHING, DRINKING, COOKING, WASHING
OF CLOTHES, UTENSILS, HOUSES, FLUSHING OF TOILETS.
• IS: 1172 – 1957, GIVES THE BREAKUP AS FOLLOWS:
76
D) INDUSTRIAL NEEDS
• SMALL SCALE INDUSTRIES WITHIN CITY ARE CONNECTED TO PUBLIC
WS
• PER UNIT PRODUCTION HOW MUCH WATER IS REQUIRED? – IS THE
BASIS FOR ARRIVING AT THE REQUIREMENT.
• VIRTUAL WATER?
IND. TYPE UNIT OF PROD. WATER
REQUIREMENT (KL /
UNIT PROD.)
AUTOMOBILE VEHICLE 40
DISTILLERY KILOLITER OF ALCOHOL 122-170
79
SHOLAPUR, NAGPUR
SANGLI, KOLHAPUR
ARITHMETICAL INCREASE METHOD
APPLICABLE FOR “LARGE & OLD CITIES” (REACHING SATURATION)
REF TO CENSUS DATA FOR LAST 6-7 DECADES.
• CALCULATE “AV. INCREASE PER DECADE” FROM PREVIOUS CENSUS
DATA. ADD IT TO “PRESENT POPULATION” TO GET POPULATION IN NEXT
“NTH” DECADE.
• NOT SUITABLE FOR “DEVELOPING CITIES: SINCE GIVES VALUES ON
“LOWER SIDE”.
• ASSUMPTION? INCREASE IN POPULATION / DECADE : ASSUMED TO BE
CONSTANT
• MATHEMATICALLY,
dP / dT = K; dP / dT = Rate of Change of Population; K = Constant.
• REF. TO CENSUS DATA FOR PREVIOUS 4/5 DECADES; FIND
INCREASE IN POPULATION FOR EACH DECADE; FOR EACH
SUCCESSIVE FUTURE DECADE, AV. INCREMENT IS ADDED.
• FUTURE POPULATION IS CALCULATED AS:
• Pn = P + nI; Pn = Future population at the end of “n” decades.
• P = Present Population
• I = Av. Increase / Increment for a decade.
• n = “n”th decade for which future population is expected. 80
LET’S UNDERSTAND THE ARITHMETIC
INCREASE
METHOD THR’ A SIMPLE ILLUSTRATION.
• population forecast numericals.xls
81
GEOMETRICAL INCREASE METHOD / UNIFORM %
GROWTH METHOD
• ASSUMPTION?
– % INCREASE IN POPULATION FROM DECADE TO
DECADE IS CONSTANT.
• HOW TO USE THIS METHOD?
– FROM CENSUS DATA FOR PREVIOUS 3 - 4 DECADES,
FIND % INCREASE IN POPULATION, FIND ITS
AVERAGE.
– LET Ig = AV. % INCREASE PER DECADE, rg =
INCREASE/DECADE (EXPRESSED AS
RATIO),POPULATION Pn AFTER N DECADES IS
FOUND AS
– Pn = P*(1 + Ig/100)n= P*(1 + rg)n
– DERIVATION?
82
DERIVATION?
• LET P = PRESENT POPULATION, P1 = POPULATION AFTER
ONE DECADE.
• P1 = P + (Ig/100)*P = P (1+Ig/100)1
• SIMILARLY, POPULATION P2 AT THE END OF 2ND DECADE
IS,
P2 = P1 + (Ig/100)*P1 = P1 (1+Ig/100)1 = P(1 + Ig /100)2
• HENCE, CONTINUING ON SAME BASIS IN GENERAL FOR n
DECADES, WE GET:
Pn = P * (1+ Ig/100)n
• ARITHMETIC AVERAGE METHOD: ANALOGOUS TO “SIMPLE
INTEREST METHOD” WHEREAS GEOMETRIC METHOD:
ANALOGOUS TO “COMPOUND INTEREST METHOD”.
• GIVES HIGHER RESULTS AS - % INCREASE NEVER
REMAINS CONSTANT BUT INSTEAD DECREASES WITH THE
GROWTH OF THE CITY TOWARD SATURATION.
• A CITY POPULATION NEVER REACHES SATURATION:
WHY? 83
rg i.e. Increase Per Decade Can Be Found As
rg = (Pn / P)1/n -1
Alternatively,
rg Can Be Determined By Computing The Av. Of Growth Rates
Of Several Known Decades Of The Past.
r = (increase in population)
-------------------------------
(original population)
Knowing r1, r2…rn for each decade, av. value rg can be found
either by Arithmetic Average Method or by Geometric
Average Method.
1. By Arithmetic Average Method:
rg = (r1+r2+….rn)/n
2. By Geometric Average Method:
rg = (r1*r2*……….rn)1/n
84
LET’S UNDERSTAND THE GEOMETRIC
INCREASE METHOD THR’ A SIMPLE
ILLUSTRATION.
85
INCREMENTAL INCREASE METHOD
• Here Per Decade Growth Rate is not assumed to be constant (as in
earlier methods) but is progressively increasing / decreasing –
depending upon whether the av. of the incremental increases in the
past data is +ve or –ve.
• The method is a combination of Arithmetic Increase Method and
Geometric Increase Method.
1. From Census Data, find actual increase in each decade.
2. Find Av. Increment of “Increases” i.e. “Incremental Increase.
3. Population in next nth decade is found as:
Pn = P + nI + n(n+1)*r
2
Where:
P = Present Population.
I = Average Increase / Decade.
r = Av. “Incremental Increase”
86
INCREMENTAL INCREASE METHOD
• Derivation:
• Let P = Present Population.
• Population after 1st decade will be:
• P1 = P + 1*(I )+ 1*r ----- (i)
• Similarly,
• P2 = P1 + I + 2*r
= (P + 1*I + 1*r) + I + 2*r ----- Substituting for P1 from eqn (i) above
= P + 2 I + 2(2+1)*r ------ Rearranging the terms
2
P3 = P2 + I + 3*r = [P + 2*I +2(2+1)*r] + I +3*r
2
= P + 3*I + 3(3+1)*r
2
Continuing we get,
Pn = P + n*I + n(n+1)*r
2 87
INCREMENTAL INCREASE METHOD
THR’ AN ILLUSTRATION
88
DECREASING RATE OF GROWTH METHOD
• ~ TO G. I. METHOD; INSTEAD OF A CONSTANT VALUE OF %
INCREASE IN POPULATION/ DECADE, DECRASING VALUE OF
% INCREASE IN POPULATION IS ADOPTED.
• DECREASING VALUE OF % INCREASE IN POPULATION /
DECADE IS FOUND BY SUBTRACTING AV DECREASE IN %
POPULATION / DECADE FROM LATEST % INCREASE.
• THUS, FROM NO. OF KNOWN POPULATIONS FOR
SUCCESSIVE DECADES, % INCREASE IN POPULATION /
DECADE IS FOUND. THEN, DIFFERENCE IN % INCREASE IS
FOUND & ITS AVERAGE IS FOUND OUT.
• Method Is Applicable To ONLY that Area, where Rate of
Growth shows a Downward Trend.
• GENERAL FORMULA TO BE USED IS:
• Pn = Pn-1 +(rt –r’)Pn-1
100 89
DECREASING RATE OF GROWTH
METHOD thr’ AN ILLUSTRATION
• population forecast numericals.xls
90
GRAPHICAL METHOD: 1. BASED ON
SINGLE CITY
• PLOT POPULATION DATA OF LAST FEW DECADES FOR
CITY UNDER CONSIDERATION.
• SMOOTHLY EXTEND THE CURVE UPTO THE DESIRED
DECADE
year 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
GRAPHICAL METHOD
100000
80000
POPULATION
60000
population
40000
20000
0
1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 2040 2060
YEAR
91
GRAPHICAL COMPARATIVE METHOD:
(BASED ON MANY CITIES’ POPULATION
• CITY IN QUESTION IS COMPARED WITH “OTHER
CITIES” THAT HAVE UNDERGONE “SAME PHASES
OF DEVELOPMENT” WHICH THE CITY UNDER
CONSIDERATION IS LIKELY TO UNDERGO.
• BASED ON THIS COMPARISON, A GRAPH
BETWEEN POPULATION AND DECADES IS
PLOTTED.
• GRAPH ON BOARD
• LOGISTIC CURVE METHOD
92
ZONING METHOD / MASTER PLAN
METHOD.
• DEV. OF CITIES / TOWNS: NOT ALLOWED IN
HAPHAZARD MANNER. “MASTER PLANS” SHALL BE
USED FOR PLANNING OF W.S. PROJECTS AS WELL.
• DIVIDE CITY AREA INTO VARIOUS ZONES LIKE
COMMERCIAL CENTERS, INDUSTRIAL AREAS,
RESIDENTIAL AREAS, SCHOOLS, COLLEGES, PARKS ETC
• STRICT ADHERENCE TO BYE-LAWS IS MUST.
• MASTER PLAN: NEXT 25-30 YEARS PLANNING HAS TO
BE CONSIDERED.
• POPULATION DENSITIES FOR VARIOUS AREAS ARE TO
BE FIXED IN THE BEGINNING.
• THEREFORE,
– TOTAL POPULATION FOR A PARTICULAR AREA =
– POPULATION DENSITY * AREA OF THAT CATEGORY
93
94
RECOMMENDED POPULATION
DENSITIES
SR. NO. TYPE OF AREA NO. OF PERSONS /
Ha
1 Residential Areas
a) Single Family Dwellings 10-40
(Large lots)
b) Single Family Dwellings 40-90
(Small lots)
c) Multiple Family Dwellings 90-250
d) Apartments / Tenement 250-2500 or more
Houses
2 Commercial Trade Areas 40-75
3 Industrial Areas 10-40
4 Total exclusive of Park, 25-125
95
Playgrounds etc
RATIO & CORRELATION METHOD
• POPULATION GROWTH OF A SMALL TOWN / AREA IS RELATED
TO BIG TOWNS OR BIG AREAS.
• INCREASE IN POPULATION OF BIG CITIES BEARS A DIRECT
RELATIONSHIP TO THE POPULATION OF THE WHOLE STATE /
COUNTRY --- e.g. MUMBAI--NASHIK
• LOCAL / STATE / NATIONAL POPULATION RATIO: DETERMINED
FOR PREVIOUS 3-4 DECADES
• AS CONDITIONS PREVAIL (IND. GROWTH / EDU. HUB /
NATURAL CALAMITIES ETC.) – CHANGING RATIO MAY BE
ADOPTED.----- GUJRATH DEV POLICY--- PROSPERITY
• THESE RATIOS ARE USED FOR PREDICTING FUTURE
POPULATION.
• METHOD TAKES INTO A/C REGIONAL AND NATIONAL
FACTORS AFFECTING POPULATION GROWTH.
• USEFUL FOR ONLY THOSE AREAS WHOSE POPULATION
GROWTH IS THE PAST IS FAILRLY CONSTANT WITH THAT OF
STATE / NATION. 96
FACTORS AFFECTING POPULATION
GROWTH
• ECONOMIC FACTORS: DEVELOPMENT OF NEW
INDUSTRIES; OIL & MINERAL WEALTH IN NR. BY
AREA
• DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES: DEV. OF
PROJECTS OF NATIONAL IMPORTANCE (POWER
PROJECT, RAILWAY, WATER RESOURCE etc.)
• COMMUNICATION LINKS: CONNECTION TO OTHER
TOWNS, CITIES, AGRICULTURAL & INDUSTRIAL
HUBS
• TOURISM: KONKAN REGION
• COMMUNITY LIFE: SOCIAL SECURITIES
• UNFORESEEN FACTORS: NATURAL CALAMITIES
– EARTHQUAKE, FLOODS, TSUNAMI 97
RAW WATER QUALITY
• WATER ANALYSIS:
– HELPS TO KNOW VARIOUS TYPES OF IMPURITIES PRESENT
IN WATER. CARRIED OUT FOR BOTH RAW & TREATED
WATER.
– HELPS TO DECIDE @ TYPE & EXTENT OF TREATMENT TO
BE GIVEN TO MAKE IT POTABLE--- FIT FOR DRINKING.
• OBJECTIVES OF WATER TESTING / ANALYSIS
– TO CLASSIFY WATER wrt GENERAL LEVEL OF MINERAL
COMPOSITION (SOFT / HARD / ….)
– TO DETERMINE NATURE OF MATTER IN SUSPENSION
– TO DETERMINE LEVEL OF ORGANIC POLLUTANTS
– TO DECIDE @ PURIFICATION PROCESSES TO BE ADOPTED
& TO DECIDE @ VARIOUS STAGES INVOLVED.
– TO CHECK WHETHER DESIRED DEGREE OF TREATMENT
HAS BEEN REACHED OR NOT.
98
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
• COLOUR: WATER GETS COLOUR DUE TO LEAVES, LOGS,
LITTER etc, & OTHER ORGANIC MATTER EITHER IN SOLUTION
OR IN SUSPENSION.
• VARIOUS SCALE OF MMT AVAILABLE: PLATINUM-COBALT,
HAZEN SCALE etc
– PRECAUTIONS:
– REMOVE SAMPLES CAUSING TURBIDITY BY CF FORCE.
– FOR COLORIMETRIC COMPARISON: PREPARE SAMPLES WITH STD.
COLOUR; DRAW CALIBERATION CURVE; SUPERIMPOSE OBS. OF SAMPLE
UNDER TEST ON THIS CURVE.
– COLOUR INTENSITY IN WATER: MEASURED USING ARBITRARY COLOUR
OF UNIT ON COBALT SCALE (VALUE NOT >20, & PREF, BE < 10 UNITS)
• TASTE & ODOUR:
– MAINLY DECIDES @ PALATABILITY OF MINERAL WATER.
– TASTE & ODOUR: MAINLY DUE TO MINERAL SALTS, INDUSTRIAL WASTES,
DOMESTIC WASTE etc. DECOMPOSING ORGANIC MATTER, PHENOLS etc.
– MOST DIFFICULT TO MEASURE AS NO NUMERIC SCALE
• ODOUR: BASIS OF MMT- “THRESHOLD OF ODOUR NO.”
99
RECOMMENDED GUIDELINES FOR PHYSICAL
& CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS
SR NO CHARACTERISTICS ACCEPTABLE CAUSE FOR
REJECTION
1 TURBIDITY (NTU) 1 10
2 COLOUR (P-CO SCALE) 5 25
3 TASTE & ODOUR UNOBJECTIO OBJECTIONA
NABLE BLE
4 pH 7 TO 8.5 <6.5, >9.2
5 TDS 500 2000
6 TOTAL HARDNESS (AS 200 600
CaCO3); mg/l
7 CHLORIDES, SULPHATES, FLUORIDES, NITRATES,
CALCIUM, IRON, MANGANESE, Cu, Al, ------ MANY MORE
8
9 ALKALINITY (Mg/l) 200 600
10 RESIDUAL CHLORINE 0.2 >1.0
(mg/l) 100
RECOMMENDED GUIDELINES CHEMICAL
CHARACTERISTICS – toxic materials
SR NO CHARACTERISTICS ACCEPTABLE CAUSE FOR
REJECTION
1 ARSENIC mg/l 0.01 0.05
2 CADMIUM (AS Cd) mg/l 0.01 0.01
3 CHROMIUM (AS 0.05 0.05
HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM
Cr6+) mg/l
4 CYANIDES (AS CN) mg/l 0.05 0.05
5 LEAD (AS Pb) mg/l 0.05 0.05
6 & MANY MORE
7 RADIOACTIVITY
8 GROSS ALPHA ACTIVITY 0.1 0.1
Bq/l)
9 GROSS BETA ACTIVITY 1.0 1.0
Bq/l)
101
BACTERIOLOGICAL QUALITY OF DRINKING
WATER
ORGANISATION GUIDELINE VALUE
E coli or thermo-tolerant coli form bacteria Must not be detectable in any 100 ml sample.
Total Coli form Bacteria: Must not be detectable in any 100 ml sample
E coli or thermo-tolerant coli form bacteria Must not be detectable in any 100 ml sample
Total Coli form Bacteria Must not be detectable in any 100 ml sample. In
case of large supplies, where sufficient samples
are examined, must not be present in 95% of
samples taken throughout any 12 month period.
102
VARIATIONS IN WATER DEMAND
• ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY DEMAND / CAPITA / DAY
– = QTY OF WATER SUPPLIED IN A YR.
NO. OF DAYS OF WS/YR * POPULATION
AADD : NOT CONSTANT; NOT ONLY VARIES FROM YR. TO YR, SEASON TO
SEASON BUT VERY IMPORTANTLY FROM DAY TO DAY & HR TO HR
• VARIATIONS: EXPRESSED AS % OF A. A. D. D. THE COMMON
VALUES ADOPTED ARE:
1. MAX. SEASONAL CONSUMPTION : 130% OF A A D D
2. MAX. MONTHLY CONSUMPTION: 140% OF A A D D
3. MAX. DAILY CONSUMPTION: 180% OF A A D D
4. MAX. HOURLY CONSUMPTION: 150% OF A D D
• ANALYTICAL FORMULA BY R. O. GOODRICH:
– P = 180*T^(-0.1)
– P = % OF A A CONSUMPTION
– T = TIME IN DAYS (2/24 TO 360 DAYS RANGE)
– FOR T = 1, P = 180 i.e. CONSUMPTION FOR MAX D D = 180% OF AADD
– FOR T = 30 DAYS P = 180(30)^-0.1 = 128% (~ 140% AS ABOVE)
103
FIRE DEMAND
• KUCHLING’S FORMULA:
– Q = 3182 (P)^1/2
– Q = QTY. OF WATER (LPMIN)
– P = POPULATION IN THOUSANDS
• BUSTON’S FORMULA:
– Q = 5663 (P)^1/2
• FREEMAN’S FORMULA:
– Q = 1136(P/5 + 10)
• NATIONAL BOARD OF FIRE UNDER WRITER’S FORMULA:
– Q = 4637 (P)^1/2 (1 – 0.01 P^1/2)
• NORMALLY.
– FIRE HYDRANTS ~ 15 – 20 CM DIA.
– PRESSURE : 1 – 2 KG/SQ CM (10 -20 M)
• INDIAN CITIES: @ 1LPCD IS CONSIDERED IN DESIGN
104
HOURLY VARIATION IN WATER DEMAND
18
CONSUMPTION IN ML/DAY
16
14
12
10
6
CONSUMPTION IN
ML/DAY
4
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
105
HOURLY VARIATION IN WATER DEMAND
• ABOVE GRAPH SHOWS VARIATION IN WATER CONSUMPTION
THROUGHOUT THE DAY.
• IN MOST OF THE INDIAN CITIES: PEAKS IN WATER DEMAND ARE
FOUND IN MORNING (8-11) & EVENING (6 – 9 PM)
• NIGHT CONSUMPTION IS BELOW AVERAGE
• MAX. HOURLY DEMAND? USED TO INDICATE CONSUMPTION OF
MAX. HR ON MAX. DAY OF MAX. MONTH OF MAX. SEASON
– ANY SUCH DAY THAT U CAN GUESS? --------
• EXAMPLE:
– RATE OF CONSUMPTION ON “MAX. DEMAND DAY” = 1.8 * 150 = 270 LTRS
– MAX. HOURLY CONSUMPTION = 1.5 *MAX. DEMAND DAY’S. DAILY CONSUMPTION
» = 1.5 * 1.8 * (150/24) = 16.9 LPH
– ABSOLUTE MAX. HRLY DEMAND = (150/24) * 1.3*1.4*1.8*1.5
» = 30.7 LPH
– WHERE AS A A D D = 150 / 24 = 6.25 LPH
• VARIATION IN DEMAND : 6.25 MIN ---- 30.7 MAX.
• EFFECT?
106
HOURLY VARIATION IN WATER DEMAND – EFFECTS?
• W S S HAS SEVERAL COMPONENTS. DESIGN OF EACH UNIT
SHOULD MATCH WITH HOURLY, DAILY & SEASONAL VARIATION.
1. FILTERS & PUMPS: NORMALLY DESIGNED FOR 1.5 AADD;
e.g. IF AADD = 150 lpcd, POPULATION = 50,000; THEN FILTER WILL
BE DESIGNED FOR 1.5*50*50000 = 1,12,50,000 LTRS;
SIMILARLY, PUMPS: TO BE DESIGNED FOR 1,12,50,000 LTRS IN 24
HRS.; IF PUMPING HRS ARE ONLY 12 OR 8, - PUMPING
CAPACITY IS REQUIRED TO BE DOUBLED / TRIPLED.
1. DISTRIBUTION MAINS: DESIGNED FOR MAX. HOURLY DEMAND
OF MAX. DEMAND DAY; PEAK FACTOR = 1.5 * 1.8 = 2.7
2. SEDIMENTATION TANK, WATER RESERVOIRS : DESIGNED FOR
AV. DAILY RATE OF CONSUMPTION.
• THUMB RULE?
– LESSER DETENTION TIME – HIGHER PEAK FACTOR;
– MORE D. T. – LESSER PEAK FACTOR
107