Nafiu 2004
Nafiu 2004
Nafiu 2004
CASE REPORT
SUMMARY. We present our anaesthetic management of a 27-year-old woman with antepartum eclampsia, mild
thrombocytopenia, difficult airway and clinical evidence of impending upper airway obstruction. She required urgent
delivery by caesarean section, which was conducted uneventfully under spinal anaesthesia. We discuss the man-
agement conundrums presented by this case and why we chose spinal anaesthesia over other anaesthetic options.
2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
admission are common presenting features in eclamptic not think we would be able to achieve adequate topical
patients in developing countries. The parturient with anaesthesia of her airway. Inadequate airway anaesthe-
severe preeclampsia/eclampsia presents a significant sia in a drowsy patient could lead to a severe hyper-
challenge to the anaesthetist. The presence of labile tensive response, possible laryngeal spasm and total loss
hypertension, depleted intravascular volume and multi- of airway control. We discussed the possibility of awake
ple organ dysfunction requires a technique that favours tracheostomy (option 5) with the ear, nose and throat
haemodynamic stability.4 Also, seizures (isolated or surgeons but they were rightly worried about potential
recurrent) are a constant threat to the airway. for airway haemorrhage and the possibility of severe
This patient’s mode of presentation (unbooked pri- hypertensive response to airway manipulation. They did
migravida, recurrent antepartum fits, and futile attempts however agree to stand by should there be a need for
at home therapy with consequent delay in hospital urgent tracheostomy. The technique of infiltration an-
presentation) is unfortunately typical of eclampsia in aesthesia is one we were reasonably familiar with, but
developing countries.9 The challenge for anaesthetists we usually use it in combination with neuroleptanalge-
working in this environment is daunting as they quite sia. Clearly, we wanted to avoid all types of sedation in
often have to manage patients presenting in extremis this patient.
with the most basic of resources. Epidural anaesthesia is generally preferred by most
As this patient would have to be delivered by emer- anaesthetists for pain relief in labour as well as for op-
gency caesarean section, a number of adverse factors erative delivery in patients with preeclampsia/eclamp-
were of concern to us: sia.3 It is generally associated with milder maternal
haemodynamic and neuroendocrine perturbation than
• Clear evidence of upper airway compromise (shown
general anaesthesia during elective caesarean section. In
by dyspnoea and stridor)
a retrospective study, Moodley et al.5 found that ma-
• Obviously difficult airway (Figs. 1 & 2) with poten-
ternal and neonatal outcome were not affected adversely
tial for total loss of control
by epidural compared with general anaesthesia in se-
• Recurrent seizures and therefore a need to expedite
lected cases of eclampsia. However, in the setting of
delivery
mild thrombocytopenia, we reasoned that a 16-gauge
• Mild thrombocytopenia in a patient with poorly in-
epidural needle would produce greater tissue trauma
vestigated coagulation status
(with potential for epidural haematoma) than a 26-gauge
• Full stomach: home administration of “native medi-
spinal needle. Additionally, we only had facilities for
cations”
single-shot epidural block in our unit at the time and we
• Poorly controlled hypertension.
considered this dangerous for the following reasons:
Our dilemma was how best to provide safe anaes- possibility of inadvertent dural puncture with attendant
thesia without further compromising her airway and headache, total spinal and loss of airway control and,
maintaining cardiovascular stability. We considered the perhaps more worrying, the potential for coning fol-
following anaesthetic options and weighed the risks and lowing dural tap with a 16-gauge needle in a patient with
benefits of each: possibly elevated intracranial pressure.6
We decided on spinal anaesthesia with 2.5 mL of
1. Epidural anaesthesia
hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine because this was a familiar
2. Spinal anaesthesia
technique and also we considered the risk of high spinal
3. Field block for caesarean section
block quite small with this technique. Many obstetric
4. Awake oral or nasal fibreoptic intubation followed by
anaesthetists avoid spinal anaesthesia fearing that sud-
general anaesthesia
den, extensive sympatholysis may cause severe hypo-
5. Awake tracheostomy under local anaesthesia fol-
tension. This may result in the need for rapid infusion of
lowed by general anaesthesia.
large volumes of intravenous fluid with potential for
6. General anaesthesia with rapid sequence induction.
pulmonary oedema.10 The use of vasopressors to correct
None of these options was entirely without risk to this hypotension in these patients may also be hazardous
patient, but we were able to eliminate the ones we felt because of possible enhanced sensitivity to these
were downright dangerous. We immediately rejected agents.11 We are not aware of any study comparing the
option 6 as it was clear to us that we would not be able efficacy of fluids vs. vasopressors in patients with severe
to maintain the patient’s airway with the induction of preeclampsia/eclampsia although we feel that judicious
general anaesthesia. Option 4 was considered purely for use of both fluids and pressors would be advisable in
academic reasons as we had neither the expertise nor the these patients. Our patient had a single episode of hy-
equipment for fibreoptic intubation in our department. potension which responded promptly to intravenous
We wondered, however, about the wisdom of instru- fluid and ephedrine 3 mg with no cardiopulmonary
menting a potentially haemorrhagic airway. Also we did sequelae.
Thrombocytopenia and an impossible airway 113
We were concerned about performing a neuraxial rient. We believe we chose the best technique for this
block in the setting of mild thrombocytopenia and patient given our limited resources and the paucity of
incompletely screened coagulation status. The lowest options presented by the complex nature of the case.
acceptable platelet count for safe central neuraxial block
is unclear. Also there appears to be no consensus on the
REFERENCES
reliability of platelet count in predicting the risk of
epidural haematoma. The recommendation that neurax- 1. Shnider S M, Levinson G. Anesthesia for cesarean section. In:
Shnider S M, Levinson G (eds). Anesthesia for obstetrics.
ial anaesthesia is contraindicated in the presence of a Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1989: 159–178.
platelet count less than 100 109 /L has no data to 2. Gofton E N, Capewell V, Natale R, Gratton R J. Obstetrical
support it and has being challenged.12 The reviewer intervention rates and maternal and neonatal outcomes in women
with gestational hypertension. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185:
recommends that a healthy parturient with a platelet 798–803.
count >75 109 /L can receive regional anaesthesia. 3. Howell P. Spinal anaesthesia in severe preeclampsia: time for
However, the patient with eclampsia is not a healthy reappraisal or time for caution? International Journal of Obstetric
Anesthesia 1998; 7: 217–219.
customer and platelet dysfunction is a well recognised 4. Wallace D H, Leveno K J, Cunningham F G, Giesecke A H,
feature of severe preeclampsia/eclampsia. We agree Shearer V E, Sidawi J E. Randomized comparison of general and
with the recommendation that the risk/benefit ratio of regional anesthesia for Cesarean delivery in pregnancies
complicated by severe preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 86:
regional anaesthesia should be carefully assessed in 193–199.
every patient with thrombocytopenia and where appli- 5. Moodley J, Jjuuko G, Rout C. Epidural compared with general
cable the most experienced anaesthetist should perform anaesthesia for caesarean delivery in women with eclampsia.
the block. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2001; 108: 378–382.
6. Richards A M, Moodley J, Graham D I, Bullock M R R. Active
We also considered the thorny issue of “informed management of the unconscious eclamptic patient. Br J Obstet
consent” in a drowsy, acutely ill patient, but concluded Gynaecol 1986; 93: 554–562.
that we could only rely on implied consent given by the 7. Ramanathan J, Coleman P, Sibai B M. Anesthetic modification of
hemodynamic and neuroendocrine responses to cesarean delivery
husband and other family members. In an ideal world in women with severe preeclampsia. Anesth Analg 1991; 73:
anaesthetists would provide care with clinical decisions 772–779.
based on controlled randomised clinical trials and pa- 8. Yuen T S T, Kua J S W, Tan I K S. Spinal haematoma following
epidural anaesthesia in a patient with eclampsia. Anaesthesia 1999;
tients would be able to give prospective consent for such 54: 350–371.
therapy. However, we do not live in an ideal world; we 9. Jamelle R N. Eclampsia — a taxing situation in the third world. Int
often provide care in emergency settings when treatment J Gynecol Obstet 1997; 58: 311–312.
10. Sibai B M, Mabie B C, Harvey C J, Gonzalez A R. Pulmonary
must be started before any meaningful discussion with edema in severe preeclampsia-eclampsia: analysis of 37
the patient or the next of kin is possible. We agree with consecutive cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 156: 1174–1179.
Balser et al.13 that in some emergency situations, the 11. Talledo O, Chesley L C, Zuspan F P. Renin-angiotensin system in
concept of “deferred consent” may be the only reason- normal and toxemic pregnancies: Differential sensitivity to
angiotensin II and norepinephrine in toxemia of pregnancy.
able approach. To have waited until she was able to give Am J Obstet Gynecol 1968; 100: 218–221.
consent for regional anaesthesia in this setting we felt 12. Douglas M J. Platelets, the parturient and regional anesthesia.
was not in her best interest. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 2001; 10: 113–120.
13. Balser J R, Martinez E A, Winters B D et al. Beta-adrenergic
Each case is unique and it is impossible to prescribe blockade accelerates conversion of postoperative tachyarrhythmias.
the best anaesthetic method for every eclamptic partu- Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 1052–1059.