IG Mock Exam Suggested Self Mark Answers
IG Mock Exam Suggested Self Mark Answers
IG Mock Exam Suggested Self Mark Answers
Mock Exam
Self marking
scheme
Suggested self-marking schedule for the IG1 open book exam
Task: Justifying health and safety improvements using legal, moral and financial
arguments.
Q1:
• Compensation – the company has had 12 RIDDOR reportable injuries over the past 2 years. If
the injuries were a result of the organisation’s negligence, the injured parties may sue for
compensation.
• Insurance premium - If compensation claims occur, the insurance company is likely to increase
the Employer’s liability insurance premium.
• Fines – the enforcement authority threatened to prosecute as a result of a recent injury if
improvements were not made. This could result in heavy penalties in the form of fines.
• Cost of improvements – the enforcement authority stated that health and safety improvements
were required. This could be costly in terms of time, effort and money.
• Generic risk assessments – Updating the risk assessments to make them task-specific will be
costly concerning the time the centre managers spend.
• Training costs – All of the centre managers require health and safety training. In addition,
employees will need to be trained once the risk assessments have been updated.
• Accident investigation – investigations into the cause of injuries can be time-consuming and
costly.
• Remedial action after an investigation – may involve repairs to damaged equipment, re-training
or replacement labour – all of which can be costly.
• Additional accident costs – may include medical treatment and sick pay costs, which the
employer will have to pay for.
• Damage to reputation – Customers may not look too kindly at a company that regularly injures
its employees. This could result in a loss of business.
•
Q2:
• Moral obligation - the company has a moral obligation to ensure that its workers, and others,
are kept healthy and safe whilst undertaking work activities.
• Duty of care - The company owes a ‘duty of care’ to workers and others (contractors, visitors,
members of the public) to ensure that its activities do not cause them harm.
• Market share – the company has struggled financially for market share. Poor health and safety
standards may have contributed.
• Health and safety law – lays down minimum standards the company must achieve. Failure to
do so can lead to prosecution.
• Threat of prosecution – if the enforcing authority decides to take action, a significant fine could
severely impact the business, possibly even resulting in closure.
• Worker morale – one of the mechanics stated that when they complained, nothing was ever
done. Morale is clearly low. Raising morale by improving health and safety standards can also
lead to increased production.
• Worker representation – the company has no worker health and safety representation. Worker
representation is key to improving health and safety standards,
• Poor housekeeping – the chief executive witnessed a number of oil spills in one of the centres.
Good housekeeping can have a major impact on improving employee morale.
• Chief executive commitment – the chief executive is willing to put in the resources that are
required to improve health and safety standards within the company.
Q3:
a) The enforcement inspector could:
• Issue a written (informal) letter to the company highlighting his concerns and the required
actions.
• Issue an improvement notice if the inspector is of the opinion that health and safety law has
been broken. The notice will specify the nature of the breach, the action required and the date
by which the action is to be completed.
• Issue a prohibition notice if the inspector is of the opinion that a health and safety breach
represents a threat of serious/fatal injury, the action required and the date by which the actions
are to be complete. The notice could seriously impact a business’s ability to function properly.
• Issue a notice of intent to prosecute. This could result in a significant fine being imposed on an
organisation, or, indeed, a custodial sentence imposed on an individual(s).
b) Custodial (prison) sentences for individuals, and/or fines for individuals or organisations.
Q6:
(a)
The chief executive:
• Demonstrated top management commitment by visiting a repair centre and talking about health
and safety.
• Made a point of talking about health and safety to workers at the repair centre, and personally
intervening to correct a health and safety issue – the mechanic not wearing eye and ear
protection.
• Agreed to personally visit all centres in the next 12 months.
• Recognising that a full-time health and safety adviser is required and providing the resource for
this appointment.
• Putting health and safety at the top of the meeting agenda
• Agreeing to provide health and safety training for all repair centre Managers.
• By personally deciding to prioritise reviewing the health and safety policy.
Q7:
(a)
• Some information is legally required to be communicated. For example, in the UK, the Health
and Safety (information for employees) Regulations 1989, is communicated either in poster
format or leaflet.
• To overcome language barriers. With more and more multicultural workforces’ language
sometimes is an issue, with people having difficulty reading or understanding written English.
• Literacy. Some people cannot read.
• People respond to different stimuli. The use of verbal, written and pictorial communication
methods helps cater to people’s different learning and understanding needs.
• Some people have disability issues. Verbal information may not be appropriate for people with
hearing difficulties or written information for people with visibility impairments.
• If feedback is required from a health and safety message, the message may best be given
verbally. For example, a toolbox talk.
• If only one method is used, people may become bored and inattentive.
(b)
• The information on the board may not be read by everyone.
• The information is not changed regularly or is out of date.
• The board is overloaded/overcrowded – with too much information.
• There is limited opportunity for feedback.
• The board may be used for other purposes (e.g. ‘for sale’ advertisements).
Q8:
(a)
• The right number, balance and mix of members. For example, a balanced mix of worker
and management representatives.
• The committee should have adequate authority to endorse decisions that are going to
require resources.
• There should be a set agenda for each meeting. If not, the meeting will lack structure and
hence, purpose.
• The committee meeting should be chaired by the most senior person. For example, the
Chief Executive. This not only demonstrates management’s commitment to health and
safety, but also gives the committee adequate authority when decisions requiring resource
are made.
Medium level: A serious incident, actually or potentially. The investigation would normally
involve the centre manager, the health and safety advisor and an employee representative.
High level: A very serious incident, actually or potentially. The investigation would normally
involve the centre manager, health and safety adviser, employee representative and would be
overseen by the Chief Executive.