Hiset Essay

Download as rtf, pdf, or txt
Download as rtf, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 8

Job Hopping is the New Reality

As the corporate certainties of the post-World War II economy have faded


away—employer-provided training, long-term job security, and a guaranteed
retirement pensions—the question workers have to ask is: what has my
employer done to earn my long-term loyalty?

Job-hopping is a fact of the modern workplace. The impact of technology,


outsourcing, and offshoring on the expectations of both employees and
employers has been profound. Performance on the next quarterly report has
become the driver of corporate decision makers. Workers have to realize that
loyalty to the workforce is far down the priority list in corporate boardrooms.

This is a new reality that human resource managers have come to accept. It’s
simply the reality on the ground of the modern American workplace. Resumes
showing a wide variety of jobs—but more importantly the wide variety of job
skills that an applicant brings to the table—are not dismissed the way they
were a generation ago.

It should be noted that there is a limit to the acceptance of job-hopping.


Switching jobs three or four times a year will still raise eyebrows. But
migrating every couple of years to new opportunities—which builds not only
technical skills, but also workplace culture skills—is becoming ever more the
norm.

Waiting around for a position to open up at a current employer might be a


fool’s errand. The position may be up for outsourcing anyway. And by
sampling a variety of company cultures and job tasks, it is more likely a
person will find their true niche and a path to long-term job satisfaction.
Loyal Workers are Successful Workers

According to recent news reports, workers are no longer showing loyalty to


their employers. I believe that changing jobs frequently is a big mistake. The
reasons for not job-hopping and, instead, committing to a company long-term
are both practical and philosophical.

Building a resume that shows steady progress up the ladder at one company
makes for a far more marketable resume long-term. It shows a willingness to
learn, integrate into a corporate culture, and be part of a successful team.

The fact is it takes time to make a mark in a workplace. Like with a fine wine,
the maturation process may be slower, but deeper. The longer the workplace
experience, the more likely an employee will be part of building lasting and
valuable assets within a company. And that is the kind of thing that will catch
the eye of job recruiters down the line. To some extent, this is about building
trust within a shared enterprise, and trust takes time.

Human resource managers still value job longevity in previous positions. It


shows an ability to be a stable force in a company. Recruiting is an expensive
proposition for companies, and employees who stay on in their positions and
don’t make the company incur the cost of replacement are valuable for that
reason alone.

There’s also more to life than a job. Staying put in a job also probably means
staying put in a house or apartment and, ultimately, a community. Job-
hopping means regularly moving—or at a minimum changing commuting
routines—and often results in losing touch with friends and coworkers. This is
even more of a factor if children are involved, since they too might be
uprooted from their community and school.

Workplace loyalty is not the priority in the modern era; rather, finding the
best-fitting career for an individual is. Changing jobs is the best way to get
experience in different workplaces and in life because it builds a variety of
skills and keeps one from being tied down in a career he or she may not grow
in.

Changing workplaces will clearly build a multitude of skills and experiences


that one could not get being loyal to a single company. As stated in “Job
Hopping is the New Reality,” a resume with a “wide variety of job skills that
an applicant brings to the table” is now viewed quite favorably and will help
an individual gain a better job in the future. Different jobs can also help an
employee find the company that is right for them. My brother is part of a
college program that gets him a different internship every other semester, so
that he can experience what each employer has to offer and what would best
fit him after he graduates. Staying in one place for a lifetime limits future
prospects and denies current opportunities to expand one’s horizons.

Staying loyal to a single company doesn’t guarantee someone a promotion or


job satisfaction; credentials are much more important. A job can be laid off,
outsourced, or given to another employee at any time. As the author of “Job
Hopping is the New Reality” also writes, waiting for a promotion or better
position to open at your current job can be “a fool’s errand”. My grandfather
worked with the same company for his entire life, and he was never placed
into managerial positions. Just because a person is loyal to their job doesn’t
mean they are happy. If someone feels like they should stay in one place, they
may get trapped in a miserable situation. Although companies value loyalty,
being loyal isn’t a foolproof way to gain favor or climb the corporate ladder,
let alone be happy.

According to “Loyal Workers are Successful Workers,” others may feel that
shifting jobs limits a person because he or she would constantly move or have
to make new friends. This is not a guaranteed reality. The ability to change
jobs often keeps a person from being limited to a set future. They, of course,
may have to move or meet new people, but if it’s for the sake of finding a
career they enjoy, is it really a loss?

The modern worker does not confine him- or herself to a singular career. The
modern worker shifts, changes, and grows for the sake of finding a job that
they are great at, but that also makes them happy.

Essay Commentary

This sample response would receive a score of 5, which is a successful, though


not perfect, score. We will first discuss what made this an effective response,
and then we will point out how this sample response could be improved.

Successes
This essay earned a 5 out of 6 because of its:

effective introduction and conclusion: While the introduction and conclusion


in this sample are not incredibly long, they serve their purpose. In the
introduction, the writer effectively presents the proposed topic and clearly
takes a stance. In the conclusion, the writer re-states the purpose and
concludes the argument in a way that makes the reader think (“for the sake of
finding a job that they are great at, but that also makes them happy”).

logical sequencing of ideas: The sample essay has a very simple structure, but
it is clear that the writer planned ahead. Here is a breakdown of each
paragraph so you can see how the writer’s ideas build on each other:

Introduction: Clear thesis that argues that changing jobs is a positive.

Idea 1: Building more diverse skills and experiences.

Idea 2: Loyalty doesn’t pay off.

Counter-Argument: The benefits of moving outweigh the drawbacks.

Conclusion: When employees find the right job, everyone benefits.

command of English grammar (few spelling, punctuation mistakes, etc.):


While the structure and wording is repetitive at times, the writer doesn’t
make any real mistakes in spelling, punctuation, or grammar. The sample
essay displays a command, though not necessarily a mastery, of English
grammar and mechanics.

proper and clear organization: The writer clearly had a plan, and followed a
logical, effective structure. The sample response offers ideas that are
supported with evidence from the passages and effectively covers the breadth
of the topic.

clear central thesis with supporting points: The writer’s central thesis clearly
takes a stance on the topic. By writing, “changing jobs is the best way to get
experience in different workplaces and in life because it builds a variety of
skills and keeps one from being tied down in a career he or she may not grow
in,” the writer makes his or her opinion on the topic very clear. The
supporting ideas all remain focused and in line with the original thesis, and
the sample essay as a whole maintains a clear, focused, and supported stance.

acknowledgement of opposing/alternative points of view: In the second-to-last


paragraph, the writer acknowledges an opposing idea, specifically that
“others may feel that shifting jobs limits a person because he or she would
constantly move or have to make new friends.” He or she then refutes this
claim, assuring the audience that the benefits of meeting new people outweigh
the drawbacks of having to move around.

Overall, the sample essay presents a clear thesis, supports that thesis with
strong ideas and supporting evidence, and refutes claims made by the
opposing side in a focused, organized, and error-free response.

Areas that could be improved

This sample essay could have earned a 6 if the writer:

used stronger transitions: The writer is excellent at presenting ideas and


making his or her point, but stronger transitions would create an articulate
flow that would make this sample essay stronger.

varied his or her sentence structure more: As we state above in the success, the
writer doesn’t make any real spelling or grammatical mistakes in the sample
essay; however, the writer also doesn’t vary their writing very much. The
sample essay is functional and successful, but it won’t blow anyone away.

more effectively explored his or her evidence: While the writer has strong
ideas and effective evidence, the analysis and elaboration can be a bit limited
at times in the sample response. For example, in the second paragraph, the
writer writes about his or her brother, who “is part of a college program that
gets him a different internship every other semester, so that he can experience
what each employer has to offer and what would best fit him after he
graduates.” This is a great real-life example, but it would be stronger with an
assurance that the writer’s brother has benefited from these internships (in
other words, the writer could have been clear that the brother benefited from
the programs intended purpose).

acknowledged and refuted a stronger counter-claim: While the writer


effectively presents a counter-claim and refutes it. The counter-claim that
moving is hard isn’t really the most effective argument and using it for the
counter-argument could make some readers think you are taking the easy way
out by fighting the opponent’s weakest argument. Instead the writer could
have done something like the following:

According to “Loyal Workers are Successful Workers,” others may feel


working in one place for a long period of time would give them a deeper,
richer experience: “like with a fine wine, the maturation process may be
slower, but deeper.” Working at one place will give an employee a deeper
experience, but it will only entrench them in the habits of that one company.
An employee who has worked in one place for a long time is likely to take on
the habits, which can often be bad habits, of the company, and be less
adaptable to change.

When you are practicing your essay responses, keep in mind both what made
this sample response strong and what held it back. If you can write a response
that is clear, takes a stance, and is supported with evidence from the passages,
you will be successful. If you can add to that strong transitions, varied
sentence structure, and analysis that really drives your point home, you can
score a perfect score.

You might also like