Labor Law Review and Integration
Labor Law Review and Integration
Labor Law Review and Integration
SCHOOL OF LAW
CLASSROOM RULES:
1. Decorum and ethical conduct
2. Regular and punctual attendance
3. Diligence more than intelligence
4. Timely compliance with course requirements
5. Obtain at least a final grade of 75%
TEACHING METHODOLOGIES:
1. Lecture Method – A traditional method where an oral presentation of information
and insights is done by the law faculty. The students are exposed to the reading,
research, and experiences of the lecturer. This provides the student with
substantive knowledge and understanding to develop their own perception and
application of the law.
2. Collaborative Method – Law students undertake group projects and discussions
where they actively participate in the learning process by interacting with each
other and listening to other’s point of view. Group members negotiate tasks, roles
and responsibilities. The students learn indirectly from the law faculty through
constructed group work, and directly from other students.
ASSESSMENTS OF LEARNING:
1. Types of assessment:
a. Cognitive assessment – assessment that will test the acquisition of
applicable knowledge of substantive law. This is done through class
recitation (20%).
b. Formative-summative assessments – graded assessment administered
prior to the end of the semester that provide feedback to students
regarding their progress and help them improve their performance. This is
done through written quizzes (25%) and midterm examination (50%)
c. Performance assessment – assessment that measure students’ ability to
perform a task. This is done through the submission of
projects/assignments (5%)
d. Summative (graded) assessment – assessment that assigns grades or
otherwise indicate the extent to which students have achieved the
intended course learning outcomes. Summative assessments usually take
1|Page
place once, at the end of the semester, usually in the form of final exams.
(50%)
2. Type of quizzes and examination - Essay questions with a total of 100 points for
each quiz and examination.
COURSE DESCRIPTION:
A review course intended for bar examinees focusing on labor laws, social
legislation and related jurisprudence. More importantly, the course provides integration
of key principles, and discussion of important updates on jurisprudence and trends as
may be projected to be covered in the bar examinations. (Sec. 10, LEBMO 24 series of
2021)
COURSE OUTLINE
A. LEARNING COMPETENCIES:
1. Define Labor Law and discuss its specific place in the spectrum of laws of the
land.
2. Discuss the main justification for labor laws.
3. What are the goals of Labor laws? What are the policy directions towards the
achievement of these goals?
4. The state policies towards labor mentioned “labor” most of the time. Explain
whether this is an indication that the state always favors labor over capital.
2|Page
New Civil Code of the Philippines
Arts 1305-1306, 1344
Arts. 1700-1712
Cases:
Pakistan International Airlines vs. Ople, GR No. 61594, September 28, 1990
Philippine Assoc. of Service Exporters, Inc. vs. Drilon, (163 SCRA 386), En
Banc
PAL vs NLRC, GR No. 85985, August 13, 1993
International School Alliance of Educators vs. Quisumbing, et.al, GR No.
128845, June 1, 2000
German Marine Agencies Inc vs. Caro, GR No. 200774, February 13, 2019
Oceanmarine Resources vs. Nedic, GR No. 236263, July 19, 2022 En Banc
St. Joseph Academy of Valenzuela Faculty Association vs. St. Joseph
Academy of Valenzuela, GR No. 182957, June 13, 2013
● Asian Marine vs Caseres, et.al., GR No. 212082, November 24, 2021
(Management prerogative - transfer)
● Quizon vs ECC, et.al., GR No. 87590, November 12, 1991 (liberal
construction; occupational disease)
● Nasipit Lumber vs NWPC, et.al., GR No. 113097, April 27, 1998 (liberal
construction; authority of RTWP vis NWPC)
● Spouses Francisco vs Spouses Galera, GR No. 205266, January 15, 2020
(agricultural leasehold relations)
A. LEARNING COMPETENCIES:
1. What are the different government agencies functioning for the promotion and
protection of the welfare of all Filipino workers, both domestic and overseas?
2. How do the roles and responsibilities of these government agencies
complement each other in order to achieve full protection to labor?
3. Discuss the concept of recruitment and promotion, as well as the different
illegal acts in connection thereto.
4. Explain the remedies of an aggrieved person against an illegal recruiter.
5. What is the extent of a private manning/recruitment agency’s liability over the
acts of a foreign employer?
6. Are non-resident aliens absolutely prohibited to work in the Philippines? What
are the legal conditions for an alien employment permit?
3|Page
● Private recruitment agency
● License
● Authority
3. Employment promotions
● RA No. 8759 (PESO Law), as amended by RA No. 10691
● RA No. 6685; DPWH Dept Order 160 (2016)
● Placement offices in educational institutions (Sec. 33, DO No. 141-14)
6. Governing bodies
● DOLE – Arts. 36-37
● POEA – EO 797, as amended by EO 247, and further amended by RA
No. 8042
● OWWA – RA No. 10801
● Commission on Filipinos Overseas – BP Blg. 79
B. PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES
1. Non-transferability of license or authority – Art. 29
Special recruitment authority – Part II, Rule VII, Secs. 58-66, POEA Rules
4. Illegal recruitment
● Types of IR – Arts. 13 (b), 18, 26, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39; Sec. 6 RA No. 8042,
as amended by RA No. 10022
- IR per se
- IR practices
- Prohibited practices amounting to IR
● IR vs. Estafa - Art. 315, par. 2(a), Revised Penal Code
● Jurisdiction over IR cases
5. Ambulance chasing - RA No. 10706 and its IRR DO No. 153 (2016)
4|Page
D. Cancellation of license or authority
1. Grounds for cancellation of license or authority – Art. 35
2. Administrative offenses – Secs 51-63, DO No. 141-14 (local employment);
Part VI, POEA Rules (overseas employment)
Cases:
● Sameer Overseas Placement vs Cabiles, GR No. 170139, August 5, 2014
(lex loci celebrationis; POEA SEC; security of tenure of OFWs)
● HOEGH Services vs Turallo, (consolidated cases) GR Nos. 230481, 230500,
July 26, 2017 (POEA-SEC; Attorney’s fees)
● Toston vs People, GR No. 232049, March 3, 2021 (Modes of committing
Illegal Recruitment; elements)
● People vs Tolentino, GR No. 208686, July 1, 2015
● People vs Concepcion, GR No. 251876, March 21, 2022
● People vs Irene Marzan and Fely Dulay, GR No. 227093, September 21,
2021
● People vs. Anna Espiritu and Ellen Mabborang, GR No. 226140, February 26,
2020
● People vs Molina, GR No. 229712, February 28, 2018
● Darvin vs CA, GR No. 125044, July 13, 1998
● People vs Miyake, GR No. 115338-39, September 16, 1997
● PPI vs Schonfeld, GR No. 166920, February 19, 2007 (AEP and estoppel)
● WPD Marketing vs Galera, GR No. 169207, March 25, 2010 (illegal dismissal
of foreigner without AEP)
Legal Forms:
● Affidavit-Complaint for illegal recruitment; Counter-Affidavit; Information
● Affidavit-Complaint for illegal recruitment in large scale; Counter-Affidavit;
Information/Complaint
● Affidavit-Complaint for illegal recruitment by a syndicate; Counter-Affidavit;
Information/Complaint
● Position paper of employee against a private recruitment agency; Position
paper of private recruitment agency
Additional assignment:
● Organizational chart of DOLE
● Interoperability diagram of concerned government agencies
A. LEARNING COMPETENCIES:
1. Explain the four-fold test in determining the existence of an employer-
employee relationship.
2. When is there legal subcontracting? illegal subcontracting?
3. Are all employees entitled to the benefits provided under Arts. 83 to 129 of
the Labor Code of the Philippines?
4. What are the minimum conditions of employment imposed under the Labor
Code?
5. Discuss the 2 principles applied in determining payment of wages.
6. When does wage distortion occur? How should it be resolved?
5|Page
7. Explain the rule against diminution of benefits.
8. Discuss the different alternative work arrangements allowed by law.
9. Is 13th month pay the same as a Christmas bonus?
10. What are the minimum working conditions for certain special groups of
employees?
11. What is the difference between “sexual harassment” under RA 7877 and
“gender based sexual harassment” under RA 11313?
B. EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE RELATIONSHIP
1. Four-fold test of employer-employee relationship
2. Consultancy vs. employment contract
6|Page
11. 13th Month Pay - PD 851, as amended; Labor Advisory 23 (2022)
● Coverage
● Tax implication
● Computation
12. Medicare - RA No. 7875
● Coverage
● Benefits
F. ENFORCEMENT POWER
1. Visitorial and enforcement power of DOLE - Art. 128; DO No. 183-17 (2017)
2. Recovery of money claims and other benefits - Art. 129
Cases:
● Dusol vs Lazo, GR No. 200555, January 20, 2021
● Valencia vs. Classique Vinyl Products Corp, GR No. 206390, January 30,
2017
● Calamba Medical Center vs NLRC, GR No. 176484, November 25, 2008
● Degamo vs MY CitiHomes, GR No. 249737, September 15, 2021
● Filamer vs CA, GR No. 75112, October 16, 1990
● Reyes vs Glaucoma, GR No 189255, June 17, 2015 (consultant)
● SGV vs De Raedt. GR No. 161366, June 16, 2009
● Nogales vs Capitol Medical Center, GR No. 142625, December 19, 2006
(doctrine of apparent authority)
● New Golden City Builders and Development vs CA, GR No. 154715,
December 11, 2003 (Labor-only contractor)
● Servflex vs Urera, GR No. 246369, March 29, 2022
● Ortiz vs Forever Richsons Trading, GR No. 238289, January 20. 2021
● Daguinod vs Southgate Foods, GR No. 227795, February 20, 2019
● Clientlogic vs Castro, GR No. 186070, April 11, 2011
7|Page
● Salazar vs NLRC, GR No. 109210, April 17, 1996
● Marby Food vs dela Cruz, et. al., GR No. 244629, July 28, 2020
● Loadstar vs Erispe, GR No. 221227, February 19, 2020
● Zonio vs 1st Quantum Leap Security Agency, GR No. 224944, May 5, 2021
● Caltex Regular Employees vs Caltex, GR No. 111359, August 15, 1995
● Letran Calamba Faculty vs NLRC, GR NO. 156225, January 29, 2008
(teachers’ overload pay vs overtime pay)
● Nippon Paint vs NIPPEA, GR No. 229396, June 30, 2021
● PAL vs NLRC, GR No. 132805, February 2, 1999 (non-diminution)
● Kondo vs Toyota Boshoku Ph, GR No. 201396, September 11, 2019
● PruBankers vs Prudential Bank, GR No. 131247, January 25, 1999 (wage
distortion)
● Bankard Employees Union vs NLRC, GR No. 140689, February 17, 2004
● MICTS vs MICTSIU-FLDO, GR No. 245918, November 29, 2022 (equal pay
for equal work; wage distortion)
● Philex Gold vs Philex Bulawan Supervisors Union, GR No. 149758, August
25, 2005
● Escario, et. al. vs NLRC, GR No. 160302, September 27, 2010 (fair wage for
a fair day of work)
● Domingo vs Rayala GR No. 155831, February 18, 2008 (sexual harassment)
● LBC Express vs Palco, GR No. 217101, February 12, 2020
● PAL vs Yañez, GR No. 214662, March 2, 2022
● People’s Broadcasting Service vs Secretary of Labor, GR No. 179652, March
6, 2012 (visitorial power of DOLE)
Legal forms:
Contract of Employment (regular, probationary, casual, project-based, fixed-
term)
Claim for employee benefits with the ECC
Additional resources:
● Download DOLE Handbook on Workers’ Monetary Statutory Benefits at
https://bwc.dole.gov.ph/downloads/2022handbook
● Latest Wage Order in CAR (other areas and provinces - OPTIONAL)
MIDTERM EXAMINATION
PART IV. LABOR RELATIONS LAW (10 hours: October 20 – November 17)
A. LEARNING COMPETENCIES:
1. Are all employees entitled to form, organize, join any labor organization?
2. What are the benefits of legitimizing a labor organization through registration?
3. Is strike or lockout prohibited by law? Discuss the legal conditions of legitimate
strike and lockout.
4. Are all acts not favorable to the union considered unfair labor practice? Is it
correct to say that only employers could legally commit unfair labor practices?
5. What are the different employment arrangements allowed by law?
6. Discuss security of tenure as applied across the different employment
arrangements.
7. What legal considerations are there for employers who intend to exercise their
management prerogative to discipline erring employees.
8. What are the sanctions against employers who commit illegal dismissal?
9. May an employer compel an employee to retire? If not, when is retirement
valid and effective?
8|Page
B. RIGHT TO SELF-ORGANIZATION
1. Coverage – Arts 253 – 257
Rank-and-file employees – Art. 292 (c),
Managerial employees; supervisory employees
Employees in the public service
Rights and conditions of membership in labor organization – Art. 250
Union Security Clause
2. Legitimate Labor Organization
Types of labor organization:
Independent labor organization
Federation or national unions
Industry or trade union
Local Chapter
Registration of labor organization – Arts. 240 – 249; 289
Rights and duties of legitimate labor organization – Arts. 251 – 252; RA
No. 9841
Determining the exclusive bargaining representative – Art. 267 – 272
Collection of reasonable fees – Art. 292 (a)
Duty to bargain collectively – Arts. 261-266
Strikes and lockout – Arts. 278, 280, 281; Art. 219 (o)(p)(s)
Registration of collective bargaining agreements – Art. 237
3. Prohibited Acts
Unfair labor practices of employers – Art. 259
Unfair labor practices of labor organizations – Art. 260
Prosecution for unfair labor practices – Art. 258
Prohibited activities during strikes and lockouts; penalties – Art. 279; 287;
Art. 219 (r)
Prohibition against aliens and foreign organization – Arts. 284-285
C. POST-EMPLOYMENT
1. Security of tenure of different types of employment – Arts. 294-296
Regular employee
Casual employee
Probationary employee
Seasonal employee
Project-based employee
Fixed-term employee
2. Termination of employment
Substantive requirement:
Valid causes of termination by the employer - Arts. 297 - Art. 298; 299
Termination by the employee – Art. 300
Procedural requirement:
Twin-notice requirement to the employee – Arts. 292(b); 297-298
One-month notice by the employer; exceptions
4. Retirement
Types of retirement – Art. 302; DO No. 215 (2020)
Retirement benefit
9|Page
Cases:
10 | P a g e
Robina vs Villa, GR No. 175869, April 18, 2016 (retirement)
Santo vs University of Cebu, GR No. 232522, August 28, 2019 (retirement pay)
Paz vs NTRCI, GR No. 199554, February 18, 2015 (retirement pay)
Pulong vs SMI, et.al., GR No. 247819, October 14, 2019 (illegal retirement)
Laya vs Phil Veterans Bank, GR No. 205813, January 10, 2018 (illegal
retirement)
Legal Forms:
Notice to employee (1st notice)
Notice to employee (2nd notice)
Notice to employer
Sample company administrative due process
A. LEARNING COMPETENCIES:
1. What are the remedies of employees and employers against each other on
account of disputes arising from employer-employee relationship?
2. Should all doubts be resolved in favor of labor and against capital? Explain.
3. Is it always the employer’s burden to prove every labor dispute? Explain.
4. Distinguish the respective jurisdiction of the different labor-related
government agencies created by law.
5. When do acts in violation of labor laws prescribe? Money claims?
6. Is insolvency or bankruptcy a legal ground to escape money judgment arising
from a labor dispute against the employer?
B. Definition of terms:
1. Labor disputes – Art. 219 (l)
2. Intra-, inter-union disputes
3. Grievance machinery – Art. 273
Reports:
1. Rules of Procedure of the NLRC
11 | P a g e
2. Procedure in execution of judgment, decision, order, award
Cases:
● People’s Broadcasting (Bombo Radyo Phils) vs SOLE, et.al., GR No. 179652,
May 8, 2009 (prerogative of SOLE vis-à-vis jurisdiction of NLRC; Art. 128b)
● USAEU-FFW, et.al. vs CA, GR No. 169632, March 28, 2006 (primacy of
grievance machinery in the CBA)
● Octavio vs PLDT GR No. 175492, February 27, 2013 (grievance machinery
● Guagua National Colleges vs CA, GR No. 188492, August 28, 2018
● PAL vs Dawal; Dawal vs. NLRC, GR No. 173921;173952, February 24, 2016
● Colby Construction vs. NRLC, GR No. 170099, November 28, 2007
● Arriola vs Pilipino Star Ngayon, GR No. 175689, August 13, 2014
(prescription of money claims)
● Fuji Television Network vs Espiritu, GR No. 2014944-45, December 3, 2014
(appeal from the decision of the NRLC; burden of proof in illegal dismissal
cases)
Legal Form:
Position Paper for the Employer/Employee
Labor Arbiter’s Draft Decision
Single Entry Approach Form (SENA)
Additional resources:
DOLE and NLRC Sheriff’s Manual on Execution of Judgments
FINAL EXAMINATION
NOTE:
The number of hours allotted in this Course Outline already includes time spent
for non-class days, such as quizzes and announced class suspensions. Thus, the
actual number of hours spent in the classroom may be shorter than the indicated
timeline. Subject to the availability of classroom and students, the Professor may or may
not schedule extension or remedial classes on Monday or Saturday.
LEARNING MATERIALS:
1. Textbook : The Labor Code with Comments and Cases (Volumes 1 and 2),
Cesario A. Azucena Jr. (2021)
Any textbook on the Labor Code of the Philippines (updated/latest)
Supreme Court Reports Annotated (SCRA)
Philippine Reports (Phil)
2. Online: https://bwc.dole.gov.ph/downloads/2022handbook
https://www.dole.gov.ph/php_assets/uploads/2019/04/OSH-
Standards-2017-2.pdf
https://www.dole.gov.ph/implementing-rules-and-regulations/
https://www.dole.gov.ph/department-orders/
https://www.dole.gov.ph/labor-advisory/
https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/
12 | P a g e