Chapter 2

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

2.

1 INTRODUCTION
Social change is the transformation (ऩररवर्तन) of culture and social organisation/structure

(सामाजिकसंरचना) over time. In the modern world we are aware that society is never static (जथिर),

and that social, political, economic and cultural changes occur constantly. There are a whole
range of classic theories and research methods available within sociology for the study of social
change.
(Social structure, in sociology, the distinctive, stable arrangement of institutions (संथिा)

whereby human beings in a society interact and live together.)

Mazumdar, H. T. “Social change may be defined as a new fashion or mode, either modifying or
replacing the old, in the life of a people, or in the operation of a society.”

There are four main characteristics of social change(Macionis 1996): -


1)It happens everywhere, but the rate of change varies from place to place.
For example, the United States would experience faster change, than a third world country that
has limited access to technology and information.
2) Social change is sometimes intentional but often unplanned.
For example, when the airplane was invented people knew that this would increase and speed
travel. However, it was probably not realisedhow this invention would affect society in the
future. Families are spread through out the country, because it is easier to return for visits.
Companies are able to expand worldwide thanks to air travel. The numerous crashes and deaths
related to airplanes was not predicted either.
3) Social change often generates controversy.
For example, the move over the recent years to accept homosexual rights has caused controversy
involving the military, religion, and society overall.
4) Some changes matter more than others do.
For example, the invention of personal computers was more important than Cabbage Patch dolls.
2.2Different theories of Social Change

Linear (line) Theory:


Some thinkers subscribe to the linear theory of social change. According to them, society
gradually moves to an even higher state of civilization and that it advances in a linear fashion
and in the direction of improvement.Auguste Comte postulated three stages of social change: the
Theological, the Metaphysical and the Positive.

Man has passed through the first two stages, even though in some aspects of life they still
prevail, and is gradually reaching the Positive stage. In the first stage man believed that
supernatural powers controlled and designed the world. In the second stage is the extension of
Theological stage For example: In Classical Hindu Indian society the principle of the
transmigration of the soul and the third stage is also known as scientific stage. It refers to
scientific explanation based on experiments.

Cyclic Theory:
Ancient notion (opinion) of social change is that human society goes through certain cycles.
Looking to the cyclic changes of days and nights and of climates some sociologists like Spengler
believe that society has a predetermined (fixed) life cycle and has birth, growth, maturity, and
decline.

Modern society is in the last stage. It is in its old age. But since history repeats itself, society
after passing through all the stages, returns to the original stage, hence the cycle again begins.
This concept is found in Hindu mythology, according to which Satyug will again start after
Kaliyug is over

Spengler developed another version of cyclical theory of social change. He analysed the history
of various civilizations including the Egyptian, Greek and Roman and concluded that all
civilizations pass through a similar cycle of birth, maturity and death. The western civilization is
now on its decline which is unavoidable.The French anthropologist and biologist Vacher de
Lapouge , according to him, western civilization is doomed (फफातद) to extinction because of the

constant infiltration of foreign inferior elements and their increasing control over it.
Contemporary Theory

The deterministic theory of social change is a widely accepted theory of social change among
contemporary sociologists. According to this theory there are certain forces, social or natural or
both, which bring about social change. It is not reason or intellect (intelligence) but the presence
of certain forces and circumstances (condition) which determine the course (path) of social
change.

Briefly put Marx held that human society passes through various stages, each with its own well-
defined organisational system. Each successive stage comes into existence as a result of conflict
with the one preceding it. Change from one stage to another is due to changes in the economic
factors, namely, the methods of production and distribution.

The material forces of production are subject to change, and thus a rift (gap) arises between the
underlying (original) factors and the relationships built upon them. A change in the material
conditions of life brings changes in all social institutions, such as state, religion and family.

It is not the consciousness (awareness) of man that determines their existence, but on the
contrary, their social existence determines their consciousness.” Thus the economic factor is a
primary one in society, for all social phases of life are dependent upon it and are almost entirely
determined by it.

2.3 The following are factors that cause social and cultural changes in society:

1. Environmental Resources-Exploitation of natural resources from the physical


environment e.g. Crude oil exploration and associated socio-cultural changes in the Niger
Delta region of Nigeria.
2. Technology -Technology used in exploitation of the natural environment shapes culture
and society e.g. internet technology has become part of the social structure of modern
society
3. Population -Changes in population as a result of interplay of birth, death and migration
forces engender (cause) social and cultural changes in society e.g. the quest (खोि) for
smaller family size in contemporary Nigeria due to fear of population explosion and
harsh (tough) economic realities.
4. Isolation and Contact – A society that is isolated from other societies may have a slow
rate of change unlike another that has contact with the outside world which may witness
rapid changes.
5. People’s Needs- A lacking need in society may cause uprising of the masses in demand
for the provision of such needs. This could be need for social amenities (सवझ वधहरु),

equality, social justice (सामजिक न्याय) etc.

6. Social Movements, Leadership and Ideology (बफचारधारा) - Social Movements with

strong Ideology and workable leadership may mobilize the masses and bring about
expected changes in society e.g. several civil society groups and pressure groups. (A
pressure group is an organization that seeks to influence elected officials to take action or
make a change on a specific issue. These groups include trade unions, associations)
7. Attitudes and Values- The attitudes and values of members of society concerning a
change may facilitate or hinder (hamper) such change. A tradition bound attitude will
always hinder social changes.
8. Cultural Base – A society with viable (capable of growing or developing) cultural base
as reflected in its level of technological discoveries and innovations would generate
several socio-cultural changes within the society.
2.4 Social integration (bringing together)

Social integration is defined here as the process of promoting the values, relations and
institutions that enable all people to participate in social, economic and political life on the basis
of equality of rights (अधधकार), equity (justice) and dignity (गौरफ, गररमा). This definition excludes

process of social integration based on force or that attempt to impose (force) unitary (एकात्मक)

identities on reluctant (अनझछिक्क) populations. Promoting social integration requires attention to

three different, but inter-linked, processes that shape the extent to which people are able to live
and work together on an equal basis:

Recognition (मान्यर्ा) of diverse social groups, cultures and identity in order to promote respect,

dignity (गौरव) and co-operation.

Representation (प्रर्ीनीधधत्य) of political voice in order to ensure that the interests of different

groups are taken into account in decision-making and resource allocation. (फााँडपााँड)

Redistribution(ऩझनववतर्रण)of socio-economic resources between individuals and groups in order

to prevent deep disparities and fragmentation on the basis of wealth, ethnicity, region, gender,
age or other social identity.

You might also like