1.4.4 - SelfVerification - Version 4.02
1.4.4 - SelfVerification - Version 4.02
1.4.4 - SelfVerification - Version 4.02
1.4.4 SELF-VERIFICATION
European Self-verification or UK Weights and Measures Act 1985 Self-verification?
The term “self-verification” has become the colloquial expression for the process whereby an
organisation that is suitably accredited/authorised can carry out the conformity assessment
and performance testing on weighing instruments that it has manufactured or, in certain
circumstances, has repaired, installed or distributed. In contrast, “verification” is the term used
when weighing equipment undergoes performance testing and conformity assessment carried
out by a Notified Body such as a Trading Standards Department or an accredited third party
organisation.
In practice, there is little difference between the last two, and the obligations that have to be
met by the manufacturer are very similar. It should be noted, however, that there is a subtle
difference in the way these requirements have been implemented in UK legislation. A
manufacturer who is accredited as a “self-verifier” under the NAWI Directive is also allowed to
carry out re-verification of the products that he can initially verify, because the NAWI
concerned do not fall under the control of the Weights and Measures Act 1985 after they have
been placed on the market and taken into service. However, the MID has been implemented in
the UK on a different basis; Automatic Weighing Instruments (AWI) that are subject to the MID
do become subject to the Weights and Measures Act 1985 once they have been placed on the
market and taken into service, therefore re-verification can be carried out either by a Notified
Body or by a manufacturer, repairer, installer or distributor that is accredited under the UK
national self-verification system. A table showing who can verify is given at the end of this
document.
NAWI’s used for controlled applications must have gone through EC type-examination and
been given an EC Type Approval Certificate. They must be manufactured in conformity with
the EC Type Approval Certificate and must be labelled and CE marked in accordance with the
NAWI Directive and other applicable directives.
The “manufacturer” must undertake to carry out the obligations arising from the approved
quality system and to maintain the approved quality system to ensure its continuing suitability
and effectiveness. They must make available all relevant information including the
documentation of the quality system presented in a systematic and orderly manner in the form
of written rules, procedures and instructions with a view to ensuring a proper understanding of
the quality programmes, plans, manuals and records and the “design documentation” of the
instruments.
The Notified Body will evaluate the quality system to determine whether it satisfies the
requirements referred to in paragraph 2.3.2 of Annex II to the NAWI Directive. If it does, the
Notified Body will grant to the “manufacturer” an approval of the quality system; which then
permits the “manufacturer” to make EC Declarations of Type Conformity.
Note: the Directive uses terminology that is sometimes confusing and this is a good example:
“EC Declaration of Type Conformity” is the process whereby the approved
manufacturer carries out the activities defined in his quality system, and applies the CE
mark, the green M and the Notified Body number
“Declaration of Conformity” is the document that identifies the model type and declares
that it complies with all the relevant identified directives.
approved quality system can also re-qualify any instruments included in the scope of their
approval that have been rejected by an authorised officer and repaired, or that underwent
significant repair such that they should be re-qualified before being placed back into use.
They follow the same basic process for examination and conformity assessment but finish the
process by applying a re-qualification crown and alongside it the notified body number of the
notified body that approved their system. Additionally they are not required to issue a
declaration of conformity.
Definition of a manufacturer
Unfortunately, the scope of the legislation for EC self-verification is significantly different to that
for UK national self-verification as the EC system is limited to only manufacturers, whereas the
UK system included installers and repairers (and therefore the distinction is less of an issue). It
will be up to the notified body that assesses the company for self-verification to determine
whether it qualifies as a manufacturer for a range of instruments and hence be eligible for
approval.
When a company has the design, component production and instrument assembly all
completely under their direct control then it is more than likely that they will be considered a
manufacturer. However, the situation has become blurred from both sides in that traditional
manufacturer’s contract out many services and, especially with the modular approach, an
organisation may well be able to assemble an instrument from components without actually
being the manufacturer.
To satisfy an assessor that they qualify as a manufacturer, the company will have to show that
they have exercised control over the design of the instrument, even if they have assembled an
indicator sourced from another manufacturer holding the TAC to a platform with load cells from
another manufacturer holding test certificates. In any case, they will have to show that they
have the full support of the component manufacturers in attaining approval for self-verification
so that they can demonstrate that they will be able to keep the necessary information up to
date. Other actions that will support qualification as a manufacturer include:
• labelling the instrument under the companies own name or own brand
• holding the type approval certificate or test certificate (either as the
manufacturer or as a parallel approval)
• making the full CE declaration of conformity and hence taking full legal
responsibility for compliance with all applicable EC directives
The process and requirements for a manufacturer to become accredited under the MID are
essentially the same as those under the NAWI Directive. The same rules relating to
documentation of the Quality System, record keeping, auditing, training and so on apply. The
accreditation to be a self-verifier under this Directive however does not extend to the re-
verification of instruments that have been repaired following either rejection by a Trading
Standards Officer or failure such that a repair was necessary that could have impacted on the
metrological performance of the instrument. (See the Table “Who can verify?”)