The writer uses a variety of techniques to criticize the actions of two explorers. Through the use of quotes, rhetorical questions, and descriptive language, the writer portrays the explorers' expedition as foolish and juvenile. The writer implies their qualifications did not matter given how unwisely they acted. Overall, the writer effectively conveys a biased and sarcastic view of the explorers to the reader through multiple literary techniques.
The writer uses a variety of techniques to criticize the actions of two explorers. Through the use of quotes, rhetorical questions, and descriptive language, the writer portrays the explorers' expedition as foolish and juvenile. The writer implies their qualifications did not matter given how unwisely they acted. Overall, the writer effectively conveys a biased and sarcastic view of the explorers to the reader through multiple literary techniques.
The writer uses a variety of techniques to criticize the actions of two explorers. Through the use of quotes, rhetorical questions, and descriptive language, the writer portrays the explorers' expedition as foolish and juvenile. The writer implies their qualifications did not matter given how unwisely they acted. Overall, the writer effectively conveys a biased and sarcastic view of the explorers to the reader through multiple literary techniques.
The writer uses a variety of techniques to criticize the actions of two explorers. Through the use of quotes, rhetorical questions, and descriptive language, the writer portrays the explorers' expedition as foolish and juvenile. The writer implies their qualifications did not matter given how unwisely they acted. Overall, the writer effectively conveys a biased and sarcastic view of the explorers to the reader through multiple literary techniques.
The writer, in means of a great variety of language and structure, effectively
conveys to the reader what people thought about the actions of the two explorers. Firstly, it is most evident how the writer provides the reader with an appropriate mixture of both facts and opinion. The first impression is created in the title itself as it hints the reader of some criticism, as well questions the reader using a rhetorical question, making them think about whether they were real ‘explorers’ or just ‘boys messing about’. As the text progresses, we can see the writer makes use of the lexical patterning of theatre by making use of words such as ‘drama’ to describe the actions of the two explorers in an ironical manner. This, along with the dynamic words like ‘plucked’ , ‘ditched’ and ‘scrambled’ used to elaborate on certain parts of their expedition, portrays his bias against the two explorers as he also reminds the reader that they were to pay in ‘tens of thousands of pounds’ for the ‘rescue’ mission. The writer also doesn’t not present his criticism directly; he makes use of quotes by experts and even their own wives to show the reader, not only what they thought, but also what his personal opinion was. He highlights how Mr. Brook’s wife herself had no regard for them, by quoting her, explain the situation as ‘boys messing about with a helicopter’ which was also quoted in the title. Also, when Morris uses direct speech to quote Mrs. Vestey, it is clearly evident that she did not sound astonished; this can depict that she was used to this kind of situations. Furthermore, the writer takes an approach of making the reader question their actions even more when he extensively elaborates on their qualifications - making use of a much longer paragraph that standouts - which however, is soon followed by a single sentence paragraph that shows how none of these ‘qualifications’ really mattered, if they acted so unwisely that they took an ‘R44’ to such a ‘hostile environment’. This demonstrates to the reader that the writer thought their actions were very unwise and childish. Moreover, the writer uses a range of other techniques to illustrate to the reader how their actions seemed very comical and juvenile. Morris achieves this by highlighting how they called an R44 a ‘trusty helicopter’ and how they tried to prove ‘how good relations between east and west had become’ by ‘crossing of the 56-mile-wide frozen Bering Strait between the US and Russia’. Mainly, this highlights their juvenile nature as they seem like children who apparently comprehend the world to be so simple while it is extremely complex and bound with laws. The writer creates a dismissive tone, emphasizing his undernimming and lack of regard towards the explorers. Not only that, he quotes a ‘helicopter expert’ to prove to the reader that ‘It sounds as if they were pushing it to the maximum’. As a summary, the writer, with the help of quotes by Mrs.Vesty and other experts, rhetorical questions, a contrast of how the royal Navy’s ship was surveying ‘uncharted waters’ before they had got involved in a rescue mission and extra detail about the R44’ and with a many other techniques manages to effectively convey to the reader his biased, sarcastic and frustrating thoughts about the explorers’ actions to the reader. Mark - / 12 Comment-