drones

Review
UAS-Based Archaeological Remote Sensing: Review,
Meta-Analysis and State-of-the-Art
Efstathios Adamopoulos 1, * and Fulvio Rinaudo 2
1 Dipartimento di Informatica, Università degli Studi di Torino, Corso Svizzera 185, 10149 Torino, Italy
2 Politecnico di Torino—DAD, Viale P.A. Mattioli, 39, 10125 Torino, Italy; [email protected]
* Correspondence: [email protected]




Received: 6 August 2020; Accepted: 17 August 2020; Published: 19 August 2020


Abstract: Over the last decade, we have witnessed momentous technological developments in
unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) and in lightweight sensors operating at various wavelengths,
at and beyond the visible spectrum, which can be integrated with unmanned aerial platforms.
These innovations have made feasible close-range and high-resolution remote sensing for numerous
archaeological applications, including documentation, prospection, and monitoring bridging
the gap between satellite, high-altitude airborne, and terrestrial sensing of historical sites and
landscapes. In this article, we track the progress made so far, by systematically reviewing the
literature relevant to the combined use of UAS platforms with visible, infrared, multi-spectral,
hyper-spectral, laser, and radar sensors to reveal archaeological features otherwise invisible to
archaeologists with applied non-destructive techniques. We review, specific applications and their
global distribution, as well as commonly used platforms, sensors, and data-processing workflows.
Furthermore, we identify the contemporary state-of-the-art and discuss the challenges that have
already been overcome, and those that have not, to propose suggestions for future research.

Keywords: UAS; lightweight sensors; near-infrared sensors; thermal sensors; multi-spectral sensors;
hyperspectral sensors; LiDAR; remote sensing; archaeology; prospection

1. Introduction
In the past decade, substantial technological progress has been recorded in the manufacturing
of unmanned aerial platforms and affordable lightweight active and passive sensing devices,
and the integration of microelectronics. Benefiting from the above, remotely controlled integrated
sensing systems, which do not require an on-board crew, are being continuously miniaturized and
have become widely accessible for commercial use. The development of integrated unmanned aircraft
system (UAS)-based solutions is increasingly providing researchers with means to capture remote
sensing data for archaeological applications, at spectral, spatial, and temporal resolutions not achievable
with satellite or manned systems. UAS-based data collection is consistently becoming cost-effective
given the unprecedented increase of precision and accuracy, and the ever-present capacity to cover
vast, often inaccessible historical sites, of varying topographical characteristics with shorter flights and
with less time-consuming acquisition planning. Thus, implementations of UAS for archaeology aim to
fill in the existing gap between satellite/airborne sensing and terrestrial archaeological investigations.
The scope and spatiotemporal characteristics of an archaeological application are determinant
for the optimal combination of platforms, sensing payloads, and processing techniques. This paper
aims to present a comprehensive survey of the archaeological UAS-based remote sensing approaches
reported in recent literature and gives a detailed account of the current state-of-the-art on relevant
sensors, integrated payloads, and aerial platforms. The conducted research tracks the integration
of technological advancements made during the last decade—on uncrewed platforms, lightweight

Drones 2020, 4, 046; doi:10.3390/drones4030046 www.mdpi.com/journal/drones

Drones 2020, 4, 046 2 of 28

sensors, and post-processing techniques—in UAS-based remote-sensing archaeological activities,

in order to identify occurred opportunities and challenges and to express future perspectives.

Organization of the Article

This paper provides a systematic review and meta-analysis of UAS-based hardware, software,
and data analysis scenarios relevant to archaeological applications of remote sensing. Section 2 provides
a brief overview of the development of archaeological remote sensing and identifies the problems for
which UAS-based data collection is called to provide solutions. Section 3 addresses the methodology of
the presented survey. Section 4 describes and analyzes the results of the systematic review. Specifically,
Section 4.1 reports on utilized platforms, Section 4.2 on navigation parameters, Section 4.3 on sensors,
and Section 4.4 on the reported cases of the applied archaeological remote sensing, and the relevant
data products. Section 5 discusses the current state-of-the-art regarding UAS-based remote sensing.
Finally, Section 6 presents some concluding remarks and perspectives.

2. Background
Traditional aerial imagery—produced with optical sensors—has proven to be beneficial to many
archaeological applications. For more than eight decades, it has systematically provided an effective
solution for settlement and landscape archaeology [1–3], which has recently been combined with other
non-destructive archaeological methods [4–7]. Aerial RGB imaging has been implemented in different
scenarios to identify earthworks and remains that are still just observable above the ground level:
by exploiting the differential shadow and highlight effects when the sun is low in the sky, the effects of
melting snow and widespread flooding, as well as the existence of positive/negative cropmarks and
soilmarks through identifying color differentiation from the surroundings [8,9].
Archaeological remote- (and close-range) sensing activities, especially concerning fully buried
historical remains, depend considerably on the quantization of the contrast within their immediate
context, which is often not found at the visible (VIS) spectrum. Since archaeological remains do
not present spectral signatures useful for generic detection applications, it is hypothesized that they
exhibit localized contrasts in the landscape matrix, detectable using suitable sensors under appropriate
environmental conditions. The measurement of the desired contrast can be realized directly, when there
are detectable topographic effects, or indirectly, when variations of vegetation, magnetic fields, electrical
properties, thermal behavior, or spectral reflectance exist [10–13].
Airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) has emerged as a prevalent active remote sensing
technique for the direct measurement of the effects that close-to-surface buried archaeological remains
have on the topography of a landscape. Laser-based sensors are capable of providing the needed
primary data for detailed digital terrain and surface models (DTM, DSM) over vast landscapes,
which, if subjected to appropriate artificial hill-shading, can assist the interpretation of significantly
more features than with original aerial surveys [14,15]. Furthermore, LiDAR has the ability to
penetrate foliage, making it particularly useful for vegetated landscapes, such as tropical regions where
rapid vegetative growth can obscure the microtopography of archaeologically rich terrain [16,17].
The artificially shaded visualization of LiDAR-produced DTMs or (the unfiltered from canopy) DSMs,
which has been explored according to slope, aspect, principal component analysis (PCA), local relief
modeling (LRM), sky-view factor (SVF), and trend removal [18,19] can further increase the visibility of
archaeological features.
The detection of the landscape matrix contrast that can indirectly provide interpretations of
archaeological significance, requires data from various small components of the electromagnetic
spectrum, making multi-spectral and hyperspectral-sensor approaches particularly pertinent for
comprehensive surveys. Towards this end, satellite imaging has contributed significantly to
archaeological research since high-resolution satellite datasets became available for commercial
use [20–22]. The level of difference between the electromagnetic energy reflected and/or emitted
from a feature and the background energy—as registered by the multi-spectral or hyperspectral
Drones 2020, 4, 046 3 of 28

sensor—determines the successful location and analysis of the feature [23]. The main techniques used
in archaeology for the analysis of multi-spectral imagery are visual interpretation, false color composite
visualizations, vegetation and soil indices, thresholding, classification, PCA, filtering, and Geographic
Information Systems (GIS) [20,23,24]. Occasionally, airborne multisensory apparatuses have been
involved for archaeological surveys to simulate multiwavelength imagery acquired from satellite-based
sensors [25–27]. Aerial thermography, to an extent, has also been employed for archaeological remote
sensing [28,29] for the detection of measurably distinct variations between the features and the soil
matrix in which they are embedded. Furthermore, case studies of archaeological aerial thermography
with higher spatial and spectral resolution sensors have been recently reported [30,31].
Satellite and manned aircraft system-based remote sensing includes expensive platforms,
which are significantly restrictive due to availability limitations and/or complex logistics. Moreover,
satellite, and airborne imaging and LiDAR, come with noteworthy drawbacks concerning spatial and
temporal resolution, and the flexibility of data acquisition [32,33]. Low-altitude nadiral photography,
as an alternative to satellite and airborne-sensing approaches, has a long tradition of implementation
for archaeological applications employing unmanned aerial platforms [34–36], with notably varying
capabilities, maximum payloads, working heights, optimal operation conditions and flexibility.
The recent technological developments in UAS-borne integrated multi-sensor systems have
provided us with powerful solutions for archaeological sensing, with enhanced maneuverability,
spectral range, data precision, and navigational accuracy [37–39]. Compared to manned aerial platforms,
unmanned aircraft can generally be operated with higher consistency and stability, under varying
conditions and over a plethora of topographies [40–43]. Therefore, they are called to bridge the gap
between satellite, airborne and terrestrial techniques in terms of spatial and temporal resolution,
and to provide easy-to-use solutions for a variety of heritage specialists [44–46]. After almost a
decade of UAS-based archaeological remote sensing, it is an opportune time to review the platforms,
the payloads, and the processing techniques involved so far over various applications, and to record
the current state-of-the-art at the turn of the new decade.

3. Methodology

3.1. Article Selection Method

To complete the presented review and meta-analysis a thorough literature search was undertaken
on UAS-based applications for archaeological remote sensing up to 18th June 2020, in line with related
studies [47,48]. The search was done using the Google Scholar platform, and produced 272 results.
Keywords for the search included drones in their various meanings and acronyms: “unmanned aircraft
system”, “unmanned aerial system”, “UAS”, “unmanned aerial vehicle” [UAV], “uncrewed aerial
vehicle”, “UAV”, “remotely piloted aerial system”, “RPAS”, “drone”. These were combined with terms
referring to sensing, sensors, and typical archaeological applications: “remote sensing”, “low-altitude
sensing”, “near-infrared”, “thermal”, “multi-spectral”, “hyperspectral”, “laser scanner”, “LiDAR”,
“GPR” [ground-penetrating radar], “photogrammetry”, “heritage”, “archaeology”, “archaeological
site”, “archaeological landscape”, “archaeological remains”, “buried remains”, “historical landscape”,
“archaeological prospection”, and “heritage diagnostics”. In total, 65 combinations were applied
using logical disjunctions. This was further complemented through reference harvesting, citation
tracking, choosing abstracts from relevant conference programs, and author search using Scopus and
ResearchGate, which produced an additional 30 records.
Duplicate results and results that were insufficiently relevant to archaeological research were
removed, which reduced the number of results to 231. The publications were collated and revised
accordingly, after full-manuscript reading (see PRISMA flowchart in Supplementary Figure S1 checklist).
The initial results were filtered according to document type. Peer-reviewed publications not reporting
the use of UAS platforms or reporting the use of UAS-based imaging only as a complementary
documentation means for satellite/airborne sensing were not considered. It should be highlighted
Drones 2020, 4, 046 4 of 28

that the current study also did not consider applications of metric or non-metric documentation
surveys that were purposed for merely creating three-dimensional (3D) photorealistic records of
archaeological remains. Therefore, articles reporting this typology of studies were discarded.
Furthermore, peer-reviewed publications that solely reported the use of images as-shot with no
post-processing taking place were also discarded. The final list of selected publications consisted of 68
records related to UAS-based archaeological remote-sensing applications, reporting 78 distinct studies
(meaning morphologically vastly different sites or the implementation of different survey workflows).
The final list included 45 journal articles, 12 conference proceedings papers, and one book chapter
(see Supplementary File S2).

3.2. Content Meta-Analysis

The studies were classified into four categories that correspond to representative archaeological
remote-sensing fields. The categories are: “archaeological prospection” for studies aimed at the
detection of buried archaeological remains either by direct sensing of their properties, or by measuring
the contrast within their immediate landscape matrix (number = 60); “historical terrain visualization”
for applications related to digitally enhancing the visibility of observable above ground archaeological
features such as previously unburied remains, earthworks or geoglyphs, and of their immediate
surroundings (number = 18); “archaeogeography” for studies directed towards analyzing the
detected archaeological features—beyond plain visualization—by defining their geospatial relations
(number = 7); “site monitoring” for those investigations aimed at monitoring historical landscapes
and uncovering their natural or human-induced historical transformations through time (number = 4).
For a few cases, an overlap was observed (number = 15), meaning simultaneous use of the same
UAS-based equipment for more than one archaeological purpose, with different platform configurations,
or by exploiting multiple data-processing scenarios.
For the meta-analysis, various parameters were catalogued, regarding the 78 documented studies,
which are fundamental to UAS-based archaeological remote-sensing applications. These parameters
for every study were: publication title, year, number of citations, thematic category, number of sensors
by type, total number of sensors, sensor brand and model, number of platforms, platform type,
platform brand and model, autopilot model, navigation system, flight planning software, type of
processing results, spatial resolution of data, complementary terrestrial aerial or satellite sensing
techniques used, and study area location. After documenting the significant parameters for each study
in a spreadsheet, we performed in-depth data cleaning and confirmed the values of the designated
parameters to guarantee data quality and correctness. We performed exploratory analyses using
column plots to determine if any trends were evident, regarding UAS-based data acquisitions and
processing workflows, in archaeological remote sensing. We were primarily interested in determining
the correlations between platforms, sensors, typologies of archaeological terrain, application scenarios,
and categories of results obtained.

3.3. State-of-the-Art Survey

In addition to the meta-analysis, we performed a survey of the state-of-the-art of standalone
sensors, integrated payloads, and ready-to-fly UAS, available at the time of our review, purposed for
archaeological remote-sensing surveys. We also included integrated aerial systems manufactured for
other applications—mainly for precision agriculture and infrastructure inspection/monitoring—which
can adequately be used for the topics discussed in this paper without additional modifications.

4. Meta-Analysis Results and Discussion

The 68 identified publications [49–116] related to UAS-based archaeological remote sensing,
were published between 2012 and 18 June 2020 in 36 different publications/journals. Collectively
the International Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing has published 9 articles (~13.2%
of the total number of analyzed publications), under the International Archives of the Photogrammetry,
Drones 2020, 4, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 31
Drones 2020, 4, 046 5 of 28
International Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing has published 9 articles (~13.2% of the
total number of analyzed publications), under the International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote
Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and
Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial
Spatial Information Sciences, and ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. The WILEY journal
Information Sciences, and ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. The WILEY journal
Archaeological Prospection published the largest number of articles (8), while Elsevier’s Journal of
Archaeological Prospection published the largest number of articles (8), while Elsevier’s Journal of
Archaeological Science: Reports published 5 and MDPI’s Remote Sensing published 4. The trend in
Archaeological Science: Reports published 5 and MDPI’s Remote Sensing published 4. The trend in
publication had increased each year steadily, until 2018, with the maximum growth in the number
publication had increased each year steadily, until 2018, with the maximum growth in the number of
of articles published observed between 2017 and 2018 (Figure 1). Citation information derived
articles published observed between 2017 and 2018 (Figure 1). Citation information derived from
from Google Scholar shows that the average number of times each publication has been cited is 9.2,
Google Scholar shows that the average number of times each publication has been cited is 9.2, with a
with a minimum of 0, a maximum of 84 ([55] published in Journal of Archaeological Science), and a median
minimum of 0, a maximum of 84 ([55] published in Journal of Archaeological Science), and a median of
of 3. Archaeological prospection related applications accounted for ~77% of the documented studies,
3. Archaeological prospection related applications accounted for ~77% of the documented studies,
while much smaller numbers were observed for the other types of applications, ~23% for historical
while much smaller numbers were observed for the other types of applications, ~23% for historical
terrain visualization, ~13% for archaeogeography, and ~6% for site monitoring applications (Figure 2).
terrain visualization, ~13% for archaeogeography, and ~6% for site monitoring applications (Figure
Nevertheless, the studies included in the meta-analysis covered a wide range of archaeological contexts
2). Nevertheless, the studies included in the meta-analysis covered a wide range of archaeological
and, broad geographic extent.
contexts and, broad geographic extent.

20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Figure 1.1.Number
Number of scholarly
of scholarly works works related
related to to unmanned
unmanned aircraft
aircraft systems systems archaeological
(UAS)-based (UAS)-based
archaeological
remote sensing.remote sensing.

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

archaeological prospection historical terrain visualization

archaeogeography site monitoring

Figure 2. Number of scholarly works related to UAS-based archaeological remote sensing by topic.
Figure 2. Number of scholarly works related to UAS-based archaeological remote sensing by topic.
Drones 2020, 4, 046 6 of 28
Drones 2020, 4, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 31

Study
Study locations
locations were
were mapped
mapped from
from the
the 68
68 publications,
publications, and
and itit was
was found
found thatthat UAS
UAS have
have been
been
employed
employed in applied archaeological remote sensing across the world with primary clusters in
in applied archaeological remote sensing across the world with primary clusters of activity of
Europe
activityand North America
in Europe and North(Figure 3). A secondary
America (Figure 3).cluster was observed
A secondary cluster around the tropical
was observed countries
around the
of Centralcountries
tropical and SouthofAmerica
Centralwhere
and dense
Southcanopy is obscuring
America the richcanopy
where dense archaeological landscapes
is obscuring the and,
rich
therefore, increasingly more studies are taking place to reveal and to visualize the hidden
archaeological landscapes and, therefore, increasingly more studies are taking place to reveal and to historical
terrains.
visualizeItaly
the leads
hiddenthe historical
ranking ofterrains.
countriesItaly
where UAS-based
leads archaeological
the ranking studies
of countries have UAS-based
where taken place
(12), followed by Spain (7), the United States of America (7), Czech Republic (6), the
archaeological studies have taken place (12), followed by Spain (7), the United States of AmericaUnited Kingdom (7),
(6), and Greece (4).
Czech Republic (6), the United Kingdom (6), and Greece (4).

3. Global distribution of archaeological study sites mapped from information provided in the
Figure 3.
Figure
75 studies
studies analyzed
analyzed during
during the
the in-depth
in-depth content
content analysis.
analysis.

4.1. Platforms
4.1. Platforms
The
The majority
majority ofof studies
studies (60)
(60) reported
reported using
using multirotor-style
multirotor-style platforms,
platforms, which
which can
can be
be attributed
attributed
to
to easier maneuverability, higher stability, and the capacity to carry heavier payloads with
easier maneuverability, higher stability, and the capacity to carry heavier payloads with smaller
smaller
platform size-to-payload ratios. Only 27 studies reported the use of fixed-wing platforms.
platform size-to-payload ratios. Only 27 studies reported the use of fixed-wing platforms. In total, In total,
91
91 platforms were involved in the studies, of which 27 were fixed-wing, 42
platforms were involved in the studies, of which 27 were fixed-wing, 42 quadcopters, 12 quadcopters, 12 hexacopters,
and 14 octocopters
hexacopters, and 14 (circle-shaped, v-shaped, and X8
octocopters (circle-shaped, rotor configurations).
v-shaped, The most commonly
and X8 rotor configurations). The used
most
platform (Figure 4) was the senseFly eBee, a fixed-wing platform which
commonly used platform (Figure 4) was the senseFly eBee, a fixed-wing platform which can becan be purchased around
$25,000
purchased USD with real-time
around $25,000 USD kinematic (RTK) positioning
with real-time enabled
kinematic (RTK) and a SODA
positioning 20 MP
enabled andRGB camera,
a SODA 20
has a maximum flight time of 50 m, 33 km flight range and optional multi-spectral
MP RGB camera, has a maximum flight time of 50 m, 33 km flight range and optional multi-spectral and thermal
sensors available.
and thermal Other available.
sensors popular choices
Otherincluded
popularthechoices
DJI Phantoms and the
included the (discontinued)
DJI Phantoms3DR andSOLO.
the
A few studies reported the use of a custom made platform.
(discontinued) 3DR SOLO. A few studies reported the use of a custom made platform.
Drones 2020, 4, 046 7 of 28
Drones 2020, 4, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 of 31

35

30

25

20

15

10

0
3DR DJI Microdrones MikroKopter senseFly Tarot

SOLO Phantom 2/2 Pro Phantom 3/3 Pro

Phantom 4/4 Pro Mavic Pro 8/8 XL

Swinglet CAM eBee Other/non-specified

Figure
Figure 4. Number
4. Number ofofused
usedUAS
UAS platforms
platforms by
bymanufacturer
manufacturerand model.
and model.

4.2. Navigation
4.2. Navigation
A high A high percentage
percentage of the
of the UAS
UAS (at(atleast
least70%)
70%) used
used forforthe
theanalyzed
analyzed studies, andand
studies, specifically thosethose
specifically
manufactured by DJI, Microdrones, and senseFly, were ready-to-fly and, therefore, pre-equipped
manufactured by DJI, Microdrones, and senseFly, were ready-to-fly and, therefore, pre-equipped
with an autopilot system for navigation control. Of the studies using not ready-to-fly UAS systems,
with an autopilot system for navigation control. Of the studies using not ready-to-fly UAS systems,
only a few reported the utilized model of autopilot, with Ardupilot APM, Pixhawk, DJI Naza, and
only the
a few reported the utilized model of autopilot, with Ardupilot APM, Pixhawk, DJI Naza,
MikroKopter Flight-Ctrl series appearing more often. Similarly, regarding on-platform hybrid
and the MikroKopter Flight-Ctrl navigation
measurement units/hybrid series appearingsystemmore often. Similarly,
(HMU/HNS), most regarding
platforms on-platform
were already hybrid
measurement units/hybrid
pre-equipped, and onlynavigation system utilizing
2 of the studies (HMU/HNS), most platforms
non-pre-integrated were already
navigation units pre-equipped,
[110,112]
and only 2 of the
reported whichstudies utilizing
models non-pre-integrated
were involved; navigation
namely an Applanix unitsand
APX-15 [110,112] reported
a NovAtel which models
SPAN-IGM-S1.
were Most studies
involved; (55) reported
namely an Applanixthe use of flight
APX-15 andplanning
a NovAtel software, and only 5Most
SPAN-IGM-S1. reported performing
studies (55) reported
the use of flight planning software, and only 5 reported performing manual flights,about
manual flights, while for the majority of the rest of the studies—that did not report whilethis
for the
matter—it
majority of thewasrestassumed that flight planning
of the studies—that did not software
report was used,
about thisaccording
matter—it to the
wasdescription
assumed of theflight
that
acquired datasets. The MikroKopter Tool, Pix4Dcapture app, senseFly eMotion, and the free,
planning software was used, according to the description of the acquired datasets. The MikroKopter
open-source ArduPilot Mission Planner were the ones encountered more often.
Tool, Pix4Dcapture app, senseFly eMotion, and the free, open-source ArduPilot Mission Planner were
the ones encountered more often.
4.3. Sensors
Significantly, 56 studies reported the utilization of multiple sensors, and 12 studies also
4.3. Sensors
reported employing multiple platforms (Figure 5). Ten studies used LiDAR sensors, 22 studies used
Significantly, 56 studies
near-infrared (NIR) reported
cameras, the used
31 studies utilization of multiple
thermal-infrared sensors,
(TIR) and2612used
cameras, studies also reported
multi-spectral
employing
camerasmultiple
(MS), platforms (Figure
and a single 5). Ten
study studies
used used LiDAR(HS)
a hyperspectral sensors, 22 studies
camera (Figureused
6). near-infrared
Studies
(NIR)overwhelmingly
cameras, 31 studiesused used thermal-infrared
pre-equipped (TIR) cameras,
or off-the-shelf red, green26and
used multi-spectral
blue (RGB) cameras cameras
(77%),(MS),
and amainly
singleinstudy
combination
used awith other sensors.(HS)
hyperspectral Canon cameras
camera were a6).
(Figure popular choice
Studies (used for 31% of used
overwhelmingly
the total studies),
pre-equipped as 17 studies
or off-the-shelf red,used Canon
green andoff-the-self
blue (RGB) cameras
camerasfor RGB acquisition,
(77%), mainly inwhile 16 studies with
combination
used Canon cameras for NIR acquisition after they were subjected to a modification in order to be
other sensors. Canon cameras were a popular choice (used for 31% of the total studies), as 17 studies
sensitive only in a portion of the NIR spectrum.
used Canon off-the-self cameras for RGB acquisition, while 16 studies used Canon cameras for NIR
All reported NIR data acquisitions were performed with commercial digital cameras
acquisition after they were subjected to a modification in order to be sensitive only in a portion of the
(digital-single-reflex, compact, and action cameras), modified by either the manufacturer of the UAS
NIR spectrum.
platform or the researchers. Canon PowerShot ELPH 110HS, PowerShot ELPH 300HS, and
PowerShot ELPH S110 were the most frequently used cameras modified for NIR imaging (Figure 7–
Canon cameras were used in 9 studies, the AIRINOV Multispec4C was used in 5 studies, and the
Tetracam ADC Mini-MCA and the MAPIR Survey2 cameras were each reportedly used once (Figure
7–right). Regarding TIR sensors, 16 FLIR-manufactured cameras purposed for UAS integration were
reported, but the senseFly thermoMAP was the most popular thermo-camera solution (Figure 8).
Most studies
Drones captured imagery with nadir—or near nadir—facing cameras; only a handful of studies
2020, 4, 046 8 of 28
stated they captured oblique imagery.

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0
1 2 3 4

1 sensor 2 sensors 3 sensors 4 sensors 5 sensors

Figure 5. Reported multitude of platforms in the analyzed studies.

80 77

70
60
50
40
40 33
28
30
20 17

10
1
0

VIS NIR TIR MS HS LiDAR

Figure 6.
Figure 6. Reported number of
Reported number of sensors
sensors by
by type.
type.

All reported NIR data acquisitions were performed with commercial digital cameras
(digital-single-reflex, compact, and action cameras), modified by either the manufacturer of the UAS
platform or the researchers. Canon PowerShot ELPH 110HS, PowerShot ELPH 300HS, and PowerShot
ELPH S110 were the most frequently used cameras modified for NIR imaging (Figure 7–left). The most
recurrently used MS camera was the Parrot Sequoia (11 studies), whereas modified Canon cameras were
used in 9 studies, the AIRINOV Multispec4C was used in 5 studies, and the Tetracam ADC Mini-MCA
and the MAPIR Survey2 cameras were each reportedly used once (Figure 7–right). Regarding
TIR sensors, 16 FLIR-manufactured cameras purposed for UAS integration were reported, but the
senseFly thermoMAP was the most popular thermo-camera solution (Figure 8). Most studies captured
imagery with nadir—or near nadir—facing cameras; only a handful of studies stated they captured
oblique imagery.
 Drones 2020, 4, 046 9 of 28
Drones 2020, 4, x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 of 31

Drones 2020, 4, x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 of 31

FigureFigure
Figure 7. Reported
7. Reported number
number
7. Reported of
ofnear-infrared
number near-infrared
of (NIR,
near-infrared (NIR,left)
(NIR, left)and
left) and
and multi-spectral
multi-spectral
multi-spectral (MS,
(MS,
(MS, right) cameras
right)
right) by by by
cameras
cameras
manufacturer and model. manufacturer
manufacturerandandmodel.
model.

Figure
Figure 8. Reported
8. Reported number
number ofofthermal-infrared
thermal-infrared (TIR)
(TIR)cameras
camerasbyby
manufacturer andand
manufacturer model.
model.

Figure
Amongst 8.
Amongst
theReported
the numberLiDAR
miniaturized
miniaturized of thermal-infrared
LiDAR (TIR)
solutions, the
solutions, the cameras
Riegl
Riegl by manufacturer
VUX-1UAV
VUX-1UAV and and VLP-16
Velodyne
and model.
Velodyne werewere
VLP-16
the most used, each having been utilized three times. Furthermore, the Riegl miniVUX-1UAV,
the most used, each having been utilized three times. Furthermore, the Riegl miniVUX-1UAV, the
Amongst
Sparkfunkthe miniaturized
LiDAR-Lite LiDAR
V2, and solutions,
the Yellowscan the
MapperRiegl VUX-1UAV
were used once, and
whileVelodyne
there wereVLP-16
the Sparkfunk LiDAR-Lite V2, and the Yellowscan Mapper were used once, while there were also also twowere
two
the unreported
most used, LiDAR
each sensors
having involved
been in
utilized the recorded
three times. studies.
Furthermore, the Riegl miniVUX-1UAV, the
unreported LiDAR sensors involved in the recorded studies.
Sparkfunk LiDAR-Lite V2, and the Yellowscan Mapper were used once, while there were also two
4.4. Data Products and Applications
unreported LiDARand
4.4. Data Products sensors involved in the recorded studies.
Applications
A major part of the recorded UAS-based archaeological prospection activities involved the
A major part ofof visible
interpretation the recorded
spectrumUAS-based archaeological prospection
orthophotos/orthophoto-mosaics (68%) and activities involved
DSMs (55%; for the
4.4. Data Products and Applications
interpretation of visible spectrum
relative percentages see Figure orthophotos/orthophoto-mosaics
9), which were mainly produced using (68%) and DSMs (55%; for
structure-from-motion relative
(SfM)
Aandmajor
percentages partFigure
see of the9),
multiple-view-stereo recorded
which UAS-based
(MVS)were mainlyarchaeological
approaches. produced
The level ofusing prospection ofactivities
structure-from-motion
involvement involved
these products (SfM)in the
and
interpretation
archaeologyof can
multiple-view-stereo visible
(MVS)
be spectrum
explained byorthophotos/orthophoto-mosaics
approaches. Thelevel
the high levelofofautomation
involvement (68%)
of these
achieved and lastDSMs
products
in the (55%;
which for
in archaeology
years,
relative
can be percentages
allows
explained bysee Figure
almost automated
the high 9),
mappingwhich
level of were mainly
workflows—from
automation produced
acquisition
achieved in tousing structure-from-motion
analysis
the last of mapping
years, whichresults—for (SfM)
allows almost
and multiple-view-stereo
archaeological
automated mapping (MVS)
applications.
workflows—from approaches.
Flight planning, The level ofofofinvolvement
pre-processing
acquisition to analysis the of these archaeological
images, results—for
mapping image-based products in
modeling,
production
archaeology can ofbedigital elevation
explained by models
the high(DEMs),
level production
of of
automation visible, thermal
achieved
applications. Flight planning, pre-processing of the images, image-based modeling, production inandthe index
last maps,
years, and
whichof
allows point
almostcloud and imagemapping
automated classifications can be realized acquisition
workflows—from using the same to workstation
analysis of and software,
mapping with
results—for
digital elevation models (DEMs), production of visible, thermal and index maps, and point cloud
minimal interventions, even in real-time. Studies overwhelmingly utilized the Pix4D software
archaeological applications.can
and image classifications Flight planning,
be realized pre-processing
using of the images,
the same workstation andimage-based
software, with modeling,
minimal
platform as an integrated solution to capture imagery datasets (through the mobile application) and
production of
interventions, digital
even elevation
in real-time. models (DEMs),
Studiesfor production
overwhelmingly of visible, thermal and index maps, and
create digital models or orthoimages classification andutilized
analysis.the Pix4DPhotoScan/Metashape
Agisoft software platform as an
point cloud
integrated and image
solution to classifications
capture imagery can be realized
datasets using
(through the
the same
mobile workstation
application)
and ArcGIS have also been implemented in a handful of studies for the digitization and analysis
and software,
and create with
digital
minimal
models or interventions,
orthoimageseven in real-time.and
for classification Studies overwhelmingly
analysis. utilized the Pix4Dand
Agisoft PhotoScan/Metashape software
ArcGIS
platform as an integrated solution to capture imagery datasets (through the
have also been implemented in a handful of studies for the digitization and analysis procedures, mobile application) and
create digital models or orthoimages for classification and analysis. Agisoft PhotoScan/Metashape
and ArcGIS have also been implemented in a handful of studies for the digitization and analysis
Drones 2020, 4, 046 10 of 28

respectively. Visible orthoimages were commonly exploited towards the manual identification
of crop-marks and the integration with results acquired from other spectra to acquire false-color
composites. Brooke and Clutterbuck [52] reported an innovative image-enhancing approach using
visible spectrum orthophotos; they used Wallis color filtering to increase local contrasts between buried
masonry and grass. Additionally, Masini et al. [81] performed multi-temporal investigations to compare
negative cropmarks, positive cropmarks, grass marks, and damp marks caused by buried remains.
DSMs were interpreted without additional processing in many studies. However, De Reu et al. [72] and
Šedina et al. [101] used multitemporal DSMs to construct differential digital surface models (DDSMs),
and monitor change over excavated archaeological sites and crop marks, respectively. Several studies
exploited the DSM products for interpretative mapping of the archaeological features through PCA
and artificial shading [61,63,72,79,88,89,96,97,100,101].
Drones 2020, 4, x FOR PEER REVIEW 11 of 31

Figure Figure 9. Relativepercentages

9. Relative percentages ofof data
data products
products used
used perperapplication
application category (VIS—visible
category (VIS—visible
orthophoto map; FC—false-color orthophoto map; TIR—thermal infrared orthophoto map;
orthophoto map; FC—false-color orthophoto map; TIR—thermal infrared orthophoto map;
NDVI—normalized difference vegetation index; RI—multiple vegetation and soil reflectance indices;
NDVI—normalized difference vegetation index; RI—multiple vegetation and soil reflectance indices;
MS-PCA—principal component analysis of multi-spectral imagery products; DSM—digital surface
MS-PCA—principal component analysis of multi-spectral imagery products; DSM—digital surface
model; DDSM—differential digital surface model; DTM—digital terrain model;
model; DDSM—differentialmapping
IMDM—interpretative digital surface model;
of digital DTM—digital
models; terrain model;
DTM-PCA—principal IMDM—interpretative
component analysis of
mappingdigitalofterrain
digital models;
model; DTM-PCA—principal
C—classification component
of images, rectified images oranalysis of digital terrain model;
ortho-mosaics).
C—classification of images, rectified images or ortho-mosaics).
In UAS-based archaeogeography applications, the rectified images, ortho-mosaics and raster
False-color
elevation images andhave
TIR-orthoimages
been used in a great appeared
extent, often in prospections
and analyzed studies (37%,
through classification and 47%
and shape
of the prospection
analysis techniques, studies respectively).
to interpret the shape ofFalse-color multichannel
historical structures [110], thecomposites
distribution were produced
of historical
either[69]by
andusing
traditional
thestructures
MS datasets[78], buried
for remains [77,85], and
image-based archaeological
modeling artifacts
directly or [74,114,116].
by combining
overlapping Lastly, five applications
orthoimages relevantwavelengths.
of different to UAS-based site Mostmonitoring and landscape
MS composites wherearchaeology
either reduced
have been recorded, most reporting the use of MS data acquisitions.
through PCA [50,84,109] or processed for normalized difference vegetation index Fenger-Nielsen et al. [64] used
(NDVI)
NIR intensities detected with a Parrot Sequoia, in combination with soil-content data from
mapping [50,52,54,56,57,60,66–68,70–72,75,76,84–86,97,99,104,109], in order to enhance the contrast
site-sampling and satellite imagery, to study the distinct spectral characteristics of vegetation within
between the proxies of buried remains and the landscape matrix. It is worth mentioning that a few
archaeological sites in Greenland, which showed great potential for archaeological investigations in
studies
the [50,60,75,86,97,99]
Arctic. Khan et al. [73] reported
exploitedthe use data
terrain of multiple radiometric
obtained with vegetation
the survey-grade and soilLiDAR
VUX1–UAV indices to
identify which wavelength combinations maximized the local contrasts.
and two MS cameras, and integrated them with in situ collected archaeological, archaeobotanical,Another notable finding
was that all thermaland
paleo-ecological, investigations were purposed
soil data to investigate the scaletowards
and naturearchaeological
of the impactprospection
of pre-Columbianactivities.
Multi-temporal thermal acquisitions
humans in transforming often appeared
the Amazonian rainforest in the analyzed
landscapes. Mather studies. At the
et al. [82] same time,
performed
classifications
McLeester et al. [84]on RGB
alsoand NIR imagery
pointed out how data captured
thermal with different UAS,
orthoimages haveand to then overlaid—also
be corrected through
UAS-captured—topographic data in order to understand the origin of
several steps—from stripping caused by the TIR camera’s periodic self-calibration and the thermal relict landform features.
Sonnemann et al. [113] overlaid orthomosaics produced with UAS imagery on high-resolution
LiDAR-derived DEM to investigate the topography of pre-colonial settlements in the Caribbean.

5. State-of-the-Art
Overall, the significant developments in unmanned navigation, drone platform manufacturing,
Drones 2020, 4, 046 11 of 28

sensor’s temperature variations during acquisition—to accurately extract temperature information.

Lastly, few prospection studies also reported the use of DTMs to identify topographic reliefs caused by
buried historical remains [58,59,73,93,96,98,112]
Activities referring to the accurate visualization of archaeologically rich terrain with UAS-assisted
approaches have either explored the use of DSMs or DTMs. While DSMs have been mainly produced
with SfM/MVS image-based approaches, DTMs of vegetated areas have been exclusively produced with
miniaturized LiDAR sensors [87,96,98,110] or by filtering 3D point clouds derived from image-based
modeling with NIR imagery datasets, before constructing the terrain model [49,106]. To a lesser extent,
the visualization of historical terrains towards the better interpretation of historical landscapes has
been explored in the bibliography by interpretative mapping techniques [65,88,96,100].
In UAS-based archaeogeography applications, the rectified images, ortho-mosaics and raster
elevation images have been used in a great extent, and analyzed through classification and shape
analysis techniques, to interpret the shape of historical structures [110], the distribution of historical [69]
and traditional structures [78], buried remains [77,85], and archaeological artifacts [74,114,116].
Lastly, five applications relevant to UAS-based site monitoring and landscape archaeology have
been recorded, most reporting the use of MS data acquisitions. Fenger-Nielsen et al. [64] used NIR
intensities detected with a Parrot Sequoia, in combination with soil-content data from site-sampling
and satellite imagery, to study the distinct spectral characteristics of vegetation within archaeological
sites in Greenland, which showed great potential for archaeological investigations in the Arctic.
Khan et al. [73] exploited terrain data obtained with the survey-grade VUX1–UAV LiDAR and two MS
cameras, and integrated them with in situ collected archaeological, archaeobotanical, paleo-ecological,
and soil data to investigate the scale and nature of the impact of pre-Columbian humans in transforming
the Amazonian rainforest landscapes. Mather et al. [82] performed classifications on RGB and NIR
imagery data captured with different UAS, and then overlaid—also UAS-captured—topographic
data in order to understand the origin of relict landform features. Sonnemann et al. [113] overlaid
orthomosaics produced with UAS imagery on high-resolution LiDAR-derived DEM to investigate the
topography of pre-colonial settlements in the Caribbean.

5. State-of-the-Art
Overall, the significant developments in unmanned navigation, drone platform manufacturing,
integrated sensor miniaturization, and mapping software that have taken place over the last decade,
established UAS-based approaches as a significant part of photogrammetry and remote sensing [117].
Benefiting from the above, archaeological science has taken one step forward into embracing these
new technologies, through various applications—as discussed earlier. Archaeological low-altitude
sensing has substantially evolved from the use of platforms purposed for recreational and photographic
uses. It has not only engulfed the advancements of those sensors and integrated systems specifically
oriented towards archaeological applications but has also benefited from the progress in other
fields, for example, precision agriculture and monitoring of structures, who profit from similar
UAS-borne sensing. Recent archaeological studies expand the scientific horizons beyond the visual
interpretation of the data products and discuss how previously invisible and undocumented features
are revealed, while simultaneously paying attention to the spatial and radiometric accuracy and
precision of presented results. It goes without saying that high-resolution and high-accuracy products,
and information retrieval from multiple wavelengths, are accompanied by considerable costs. Although
a trend is evident regarding researchers who invest in high-end fully autonomous integrated UAS,
more application-oriented projects seem to prefer custom solutions. Therefore, in this section,
we provide information on both integrated ready-to-fly UAS and specialized options for payload
integration. Table 1 provides some examples of integrated solutions, which are purposed or can be
repurposed for archaeological remote sensing surveys (also examples in Figure 10). The reported
integrated systems are ready-to-fly UAS with pre-equipped navigation system, autopilot, sensors,
gimbals, and all necessary electrical on-board equipment.
Drones 2020, 4, 046 12 of 28

Table 1. Examples of integrated ready-to-fly UAS which can be used for archeological surveys.

Brand Model Platform Type Sensors Max. Flight Time (m)

P4 Multispectral quad-copter RGB + 5 monochrome multispectral 27
DJI FPV RGB cameras *, RGB cameras *,
Matrice 200 V2 quad-copter 24
Zenmuse XT
FPV RGB cameras *, RGB cameras *,
Matrice 600 PRO hexa-copter 16–18
Zenmuse XT
Panasonic ZS50 RGB camera +
Falcon 8+ octo-copter 16–26
Intel Flir Tau 2 640
Sony a6300 *, RX1R II *,
Sirius Pro fixed-wing
MicaSense RedEdge *
Leica Aibot AX20 quad-copter Sony α6300/Sony α7RII 24
mdLiDAR3000LR aaS quad-copter Riegl VUX-1UAV 27–32
Microdrones mdLiDAR3000 aaS quad-copter Riegl miniVUX-2UAV + Sony RX1R II 27–32
SICK LD-MRS4 LiDAR + FLIR 5MP
mdLiDAR1000 aaS quad-copter 25
Global Shutter
Bluegrass Fields quad-copter Parrot Sequoia 25
Parrot
ANAFI Thermal quad-copter FLIR Lepton 3.5 26
VUX-1UAV, up to 3 high-resolution
Riegl RiCOPTER with VUX-SYS quad-copter 30
cameras *
senseFly eBee X fixed-wing senseFly Duet T *, Parrot Sequoia+ * 90
QuestUAV DATAhawk AG fixed-wing MicaSense RedEdge 55
Note: RGB: Red Green Blue; FPV: First-person view; * Option provided by the manufacturer.
Drones 2020, 4, x FOR PEER REVIEW 13 of 31

Figure
Figure 10.
10. Examples
Examplesofofintegrated
integratedready-to-fly
ready-to-flyUAS:
UAS:(A) DJIDJI
(A) P4P4
Multispectral; (B)(B)
Multispectral; Intel Falcon
Intel 8+; (C)
Falcon 8+;
LeicaLeica
(C) Aibot AX20;
Aibot (D) (D)
AX20; Microdrones
Microdrones mdLiDAR1000
mdLiDAR1000 aaS;
aaS;(E)(E)Intel
IntelSirius
SiriusPro;
Pro;(F)
(F) Parrot ANAFI
Parrot ANAFI
Thermal; (G)
Thermal; (G) senseFly
senseFly eBeeX;
eBeeX; (H)
(H) QuestUAV
QuestUAV DATAhawk
DATAhawkAG AG.
.

Platforms
5.1. Platforms
UAS operated for archaeological remote sensing mainly fall into the Micro (<2 (<2 kg weight, up to
200 m altitude, <5
<5 km radius, <1<1 hh endurance), altitude, <25
Mini (2–20 kg weight, up to 3000 m altitude,
endurance), Mini <25 km
radius, 1–2 h endurance), and seldom Small (20–150 kg weight, up to 5000 m altitude, <50 km radius,
<50 km radius,
1–5 h endurance)
endurance) categories (after Qi et al.al. [118]).
[118]). While the quality of acquired datasets depends
largely on on-board sensors (described in Sections 5.4–5.7), platform typology and configuration
play an essential role in the success
success of
of the
the remote-sensing
remote-sensing mission,
mission, simultaneously
simultaneously constraining the
payload that may
may bebe deployed
deployed and
andthetheflight
flightplanning.
planning.Fixed-wing
Fixed-wing UAS
UAS have
have a clear
a clear advantage
advantage in
archaeological surveys because their longer flight autonomy allows the coverage of much more
extensive historical sites and landscapes than the average multi-rotor (Table 2). Fixed-wing aircrafts’
increased stability allows greater control over flight parameters and the quality of collected data.
However, the competition with rotary-wing aircraft is always present because multi-rotors have
greater maneuverability and allow heavier payloads and more customizability, therefore having
Drones 2020, 4, 046 13 of 28

in archaeological surveys because their longer flight autonomy allows the coverage of much more
extensive historical sites and landscapes than the average multi-rotor (Table 2). Fixed-wing aircrafts’
increased stability allows greater control over flight parameters and the quality of collected data.
However, the competition with rotary-wing aircraft is always present because multi-rotors have greater
maneuverability and allow heavier payloads and more customizability, therefore having more options
for sensor integration.

Table 2. Comparison between different features of fixed-wing and multi-rotor UAS, modified from
Jeziorska [119].

Fixed-Wing Multi-Rotor
long flight autonomy greater maneuverability
better control of flight parameters more compact and portable
higher control of data quality easy to use
Advantages greater stability higher payload capacity
more flexibility in payload
higher flight safety
configuration
ability to hover
small landing/take-off zone
less compact and portable shorter range
Disadvantages challenging to fly less stable in the wind
larger take-off/landing site needed

Multi-rotor UAS are additionally more compact (speaking for the same platform body
size-to-payload weight ratio), and subsequently more easily transportable. Despite their short flying
duration, which limits the archaeological area that can be covered within a single flight, they have
some distinct attributes that may be necessary in certain contexts, as the ability to hover and capture
data while remaining over one place, the ease of capturing oblique imagery, and vertical take-off and
landing that allows for more flexible deployment in areas that would be inaccessible with fixed-wing
aircraft. Some conventional multi-rotor frames used in customized UAS for archaeological applications
are MikroKopter’s MK8-2500 (8 rotors, folded dimensions 64 cm × 60 cm, max. payload 2.5 kg) and
MK8-3500 (8 rotors, max. payload 3.5 kg), and VulcanUAV’s Black Widow (4 rotors, max payload
4.6 kg) and Raven (8 rotors-X8 configuration, max. payload 10 kg).

5.2. Orientation Systems

The miniaturization of computer boards, Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) receivers and
antennas, inertial measurement units (IMUs) and, in general, electronics has allowed the integration
of hybrid measurement units (HMU) for UAS whose measurements can be processed, in a hybrid
navigation system (HNS) or in post-processing, in a hybrid orientation system (HOS). The results
depend on the quality of the GNSS receiver and the GNSS antenna, and the accuracy of the attitude part
of the orientation is highly dependent on the IMU quality and flight dynamics. To deliver orientation
parameters, and data products at cm-level with increased reliability, primarily two modifications
of kinematic GNSS measurements are being adopted for UAS applications. RTK—which considers
that there is real time communication of the UAS with a ground reference station (using radio
link)—delivers corrections to GNSS measurements during the flight. Post-processed kinematic (PPK),
on the other hand, depends on corrections from a reference station that are applied post-flight [120,121].
As RTK-enabled receivers have already been available on several commercial platforms, and PPK
is becoming more common for UAS-based archaeological surveys, it is useful to review the current
capabilities of HMU and HNS solutions for unmanned aircraft operations. Therefore, the state-of-the-art
integrated solutions are presented in Table 3, taking into consideration that the values given are simply
indicative as they include general specifications and optimal testing conditions.
Drones 2020, 4, 046 14 of 28

Table 3. Commercial hybrid measurement units and hybrid navigation systems for unmanned
aerial orientations.

σ p hz σ p hz
Weight GNSS σ p hz σ√
α σ ω√
Make Model SPS RTK* σ θ,γ σψ
(kg) Φ or ρ RTK (m) (µG/ Hz) (deg/s/ Hz)
(m) (m)
Trimble APX-20 UAV 420 Φ 1.5–3.0 0.02–0.05 0.02–0.05 NA NA 0.015 0.035
iMAR iNAT-M200-FLAT/SLN 550 Φ 0.4–1.8 0.1 0.03 60 0.150 0.030 0.100
iMAR iNAT-M200/MLN 900 Φ 0.4–1.8 0.1 0.03 25 0.150 0.010 0.030
Adv.
Spatial-Dual 304 ρ 0.5–1.2 NA 0.008 100 0.004 0.030 0.060
Nav.
NovAtel SPAN CPT7 495 Φ 1.0 0.02 0.01 NA NA 0.005 0.010
Note: Φ: phase measurements; ρ: code measurements; σp hz : horizontal position accuracy (RMS); SPS: standard
positioning service; RTK: real-time kinematic; RTK*: real-time kinematic post-processed; σα : linear accelerations’
noise (PSD level); σω : angular rates’ noise (PSD level); σθ,γ : roll and pitch precision (whole spectrum); σψ : heading
precision (whole spectrum); NA: not available.

5.3. Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) Sensors

The reduction in LiDAR sensor size and price are making them more common for UAS-based
archaeological surveys. The market of 3D laser scanners for unmanned platforms has grown rapidly,
and the technological developments are increasing the quality of data acquired by these sensors.
This creates the prospect of replacing airborne LiDAR since essential characteristics of LiDAR data are
largely unaffected by the carrying platform, which implies that existing well-developed processing
techniques can be used on these data. Limitations caused by the tradeoff between performance and
size or cost of LiDAR, can be partially overcome by the proximity of the sensor and the surveyed area
in comparison to airborne scanning. Presently Quanergy, Riegl, and Velodyne dominate the market of
LiDAR sensors
Drones 2020, manufactured
4, x FOR PEER REVIEWto be mounted on UAS (examples in Figure 11), as the overwhelming 16 of 31
majority of integrated payload for scanning, include their products. Table 4 presents the available
Note: FOV:
lightweight LiDAR field-of-view;
sensors. A (V)detailed
vertical;account
(H) horizontal; (C) circular;
of integrated LiDAR * at maximum
payloads canlaser pulse in
be found
repetition
Appendix A. rate (PRR) and full power—single return.

Figure 11.Examples
Figure11. ExamplesofofLiDAR
LiDARsensors
sensorsfor
forUAS:
UAS:(A)
(A)RIEGL
RIEGLVUX-1UAV;
VUX-1UAV;(B)(B)RIEGL
RIEGLminiVUX-2UAV;
miniVUX-2UAV;
(C) Velodyne HDL-32E; (D) Velodyne Puck 32MR; (E) Quanergy M8-Core; (F)
(C) Velodyne HDL-32E; (D) Velodyne Puck 32MR; (E) Quanergy M8-Core; (F) Quanergy M8-PoE+.
Quanergy M8-PoE+.

5.4. Near-Infrared and Multi-Spectral Cameras

The exploitation of NIR imagery can contribute significantly to UAS-based archaeology [122],
and therefore various sensor solutions have been explored to incorporate the NIR spectrum in
prospection-related applications. As the meta-analysis revealed, the Canon S110 digital cameras,
modified for red-edge and near-infrared imaging, have been frequently used over the past decade,
serving as a default multi-spectral solution for the senseFly fixed-wing aircrafts until 2014. These
cameras are currently being replaced by various high-resolution models, as the modification of
compact and digital single-lens reflex (DSLR) cameras, for beyond-visible acquisition, becomes more
Drones 2020, 4, 046 15 of 28

Table 4. Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensors for UAS.

Max. Shots/s Accuracy Weight

Make Model Range (m) FOV (deg)
Returns (1000) * (cm) (kg)
M8-Core 100 (V) 20, (H) 360 3 430 3 0.90
M8-Plus 150 (V) 20, (H) 360 3 430 3 0.90
Quanergy
M8-Ultra 200 (V) 20, (H) 360 3 430 3 0.90
M8-PoE+ 150 (V) 20, (H) 360 3 430 3 1.36
VUX-1UAV 340 330 4 550 1 3.5
miniVUX-1UAV 330 360 5 100 1.5 1.6
RIEGL
miniVUX-2UAV 280 360 5 200 1.5 1.6
miniVUX-1DL 260 (C) 46 5 100 1.5 2.5
HDL-32E 100 (V) 41.33, (H) 360 2 695 2 1.0
Puck 100 (V) 30, (H) 360 2 300 3 0.83
Velodyne Puck LITE 100 (V) 30, (H) 360 2 300 3 0.59
Puck 32MR 120 (V) 40, (H) 360 2 600 3 0.93
Ultra Puck 200 (V) 40, (H) 360 2 600 3 0.93
Note: FOV: field-of-view; (V) vertical; (H) horizontal; (C) circular; * at maximum laser pulse repetition rate (PRR)
and full power—single return.

5.4. Near-Infrared and Multi-Spectral Cameras

The exploitation of NIR imagery can contribute significantly to UAS-based archaeology [122],
and therefore various sensor solutions have been explored to incorporate the NIR spectrum in
prospection-related applications. As the meta-analysis revealed, the Canon S110 digital cameras,
modified for red-edge and near-infrared imaging, have been frequently used over the past
decade, serving as a default multi-spectral solution for the senseFly fixed-wing aircrafts until 2014.
These cameras are currently being replaced by various high-resolution models, as the modification of
compact and digital single-lens reflex (DSLR) cameras, for beyond-visible acquisition, becomes more
prevalent. At the same time, various lower-resolution lightweight camera options for UAS-based MS
imaging are available, having the advantage of more than three narrower bands. Table 5 summarizes
the characteristics of some typical and/or representative camera options (in Figure 12).

Table 5. Multi-spectral cameras for UAS.

Single-Band
Brand Model System Configuration Multi-Spectral Bands
Resolution (px)
B, G, R, NIR1, NIR2,
Buzzard Six Band 6-camera 1280 × 1024
NIR3
RedEdge-MX 5-camera B, G, R, RE, NIR 1280 × 960
MicaSense
Altum 5-camera + LWIR camera B, G, R, RE, NIR, LWIR 2064 × 1544
Parrot Sequoia+ 4-camera + RGB camera G, R, RE, NIR 1280 × 960
VIS, V, B, G, R, RE, NIR1,
SAL MAIA WV 9-camera 1280 × 960
NIR 2
MCAW 6-camera (450–1000 nm) user-selectable 1280 × 1024
Micro-MCA 4, 6 or 12-camera user-selectable 1280 × 1024
Tetracam
RGB + 3 4-camera VIS, NDVI R + RE + NIR 1280 × 1024
ADC-Micro single 3-band camera G, R, NIR 2048 × 1536
Note: B: blue; G: green; R: red; NIR: near-infrared; RE: red-edge; LWIR: long-wave infrared.
Drones 2020, 4, 046 16 of 28
Drones 2020, 4, x FOR PEER REVIEW 17 of 31

Examples
Figure 12.Figure of multi-spectral cameras for UAS: (A) Buzzard Six Band; (B) MicaSense
12. Examples of multi-spectral cameras for UAS: (A) Buzzard Six Band; (B) MicaSense
RedEdge-MX; (C) MicaSense Altum;
RedEdge-MX; (C) MicaSense (D)(D)
Altum; Parrot
ParrotSequoia+;
Sequoia+; (E)(E)
SALSAL MAIA
MAIA WV;
WV; (F) (F) Tetracam
Tetracam MCAW; MCAW;
(G) Tetracam ADC-Micro.
(G) Tetracam ADC-Micro.

5.5. Hyperspectral Cameras

5.5. Hyperspectral Cameras
To cover the need for the detection of information from multiple very narrow bands of the
To cover the need for the detection of information from multiple very narrow bands of the
electromagnetic spectrum [123], and towards the more accurate calculation of vegetation and soil
electromagnetic
indices, spectrum
HS imaging [123],
sensors and towards the
have consistently beenmore accurate
miniaturized, andcalculation
can currentlyofbe vegetation
mounted on and soil
indices, HSUAS
imaging sensors
platforms. have
Some of themconsistently been6 miniaturized,
are listed in Table (also examples inand can13).
Figure currently be mounted on
It is the authors’
opinion that these sensors will continue to play a significant role in UAS-based archaeological
UAS platforms. Some of them are listed in Table 6 (also examples in Figure 13). It is the authors’ opinion
prospection, and geoarchaeology.
that these sensors will continue to play a significant role in UAS-based archaeological prospection,
and geoarchaeology.

Table 6. Hyperspectral cameras for UAS (weight ≤ 2 kg).

Spectral
Spectral Resolution Acquisition Weight
Brand Model Range Bands
Step (nm) (px) Mode (kg)
(nm)
BaySpec OCI-UAV-D1000 450–970 120 5.0 a 2000 P 1.14
Brandywine Photonics CHAI V-640 400–1000 256 2.5, 5.0, 10.0 640 × 512 S 0.48 d
400–800 120
vis-NIR microHSI 400–1000 180 3.3 a 1360 c P 0.45
380–880 150
Corning Inc. vis-SWIR 600–1700 110 10.0 a 1280 c P 1.6
SWIR microHSI 640C 850–1700 170 5.0 a 640 c P 1.1
alpha-SWIR microHSI 900–1700 160 5.0 a 640 c P 1.2
LWIR 7800–13,400 60 100 a 320 c P 1.15
Nano-Hyperspec 400–1000 270 6a 640 c P 0.5 d
400–1000 324/369 5.8/5.8 a 1004/1600 c 0.7/1.1 d
Headwall Photonics Inc.
Micro-Hyperspec 900–1700 134/67 10.0/10.0 a 640/320 c 0.9 d
P
600–1700 267 5.5 a 640 c 0.9 d
900–2500 166/267 10/8 a 384/640 c 2.0/1.6 d
Photonfocus MV1-D2048 × 1088-HS05-G2 470–900 150 10.0 b 2048 × 1088 S 0.265 d
RESONON Pika L 400–1000 281 b 900 c P 0.6
2.1
HSC-2.1-B 450–800 a
SENOP ≤1000 1.0 1024 × 1024 S 0.99
HSC-2.1-C 500–900
400–1000
FX10 224 5.5 a 1025 × 1024 S 1.3
SPECIM 400–780
FX17 900–1700 224 8.0 a 640 × 640 S 1.56
MQ022HG-IM-LS100-NIR 600–1000 100 4.0 b
MQ022HG-IM-LS150-VISNIR 470–900 150 3.0 b
XIMEA 2048 × 1088 S 0.032 d
MQ022HG-IM-SM4X4-VIS 470–620 16 10.0 b
MQ022HG-IM-SM5X5-NIR 665–975 25 12.5 b
MQ022HG-IM-SM4X4-REDNIR 630–780 16 10.0 b
Note: a at FWHM; b by sampling; c pushbroom line length (the other dimension depends on sensor’s sweep
distance); d without lens, inertial navigation and global navigation satellite systems; P—pushbroom; S—snapshot.
Drones 2020, 4, 046 17 of 28
Drones 2020, 4, x FOR PEER REVIEW 19 of 31

Figure 13. Examples

Figure of hyperspectral
13. Examples cameras
of hyperspectral for UAS:
cameras (A)(A)
for UAS: Photonfocus
PhotonfocusMV1-D2048x1088-HS05-G2;
MV1-D2048x1088-HS05-G2;
(B) RESONON Pika L;Pika
(B) RESONON (C) SENOP HSC-2;
L; (C) SENOP (D) SPECIM
HSC-2; FX10;
(D) SPECIM (E)(E)
FX10; XIMEA
XIMEAxiSpec
xiSpecSeries.
Series.

5.6. Thermal Cameras

5.6. Thermal Cameras
There have
Therebeen
have essential advancements
been essential in thermal
advancements in thermalcamera
cameraminiaturization
miniaturization in inrecent
recentyears.
years.
Lightweight,
Lightweight, small-size
small-size LWIR LWIR imagers,
imagers, suchasasthose
such those developed
developed bybyFLIR, were
FLIR, first first
were introduced in a
introduced
military context for remote reconnaissance and are becoming more common
in a military context for remote reconnaissance and are becoming more common in UAS-based in UAS-based
remote-sensing
remote-sensing applications
applications such such as archaeological
as archaeological prospection. Table
prospection. Table 77 compiles
compiles somesomeexisting
existing
products in the family of thermal sensors, suitable for light UAS (also examples in Figure 14).
products in the family of thermal sensors, suitable for light UAS (also examples in Figure 14).

Table 7. Thermal cameras for UAS.

Spectral Resolution Pixel Size Accuracy

Manufacturer Model Weight (g)
Range (µm) (px) (µm) (±◦ C)
Lepton 3.5 8–14 160 × 120 12 5 0.9 b
Vue Pro 7.35–13.5 336 × 256 17 5 92–113
FLIR Vue Pro R 7.35–13.5 640 × 512 17 5 92–113
Zenmuse XT 7.35–13.5 640 × 512 a 17 5 270
Zenmuse XT2 7.5–13.5 640 × 512 a 17 5 588
9320 P-Series 7–14 320 × 240 17 1 37 b
9640 P-Series 7–14 640 × 480 17 1 37 b
ICI
SWIR 320 P-Series 7–14 320 × 256 15 1 130 b
SWIR 640 P-Series 7–14 640 × 512 15 1 130 b
InfraTec VarioCAM HDx head S 7.5–14 640 × 480 17 2 1100
TAMARISK Precision320 7.5–14 320 × 240 17 5 48–134
Leonardo
TAMARISK Precision640 7.5–14 640 × 480 17 5 90–295
DRS
Tenum640 8–14 640 × 512 10 39–48
PI 450i 8–14 382 × 288 17 2 195
Optris Figure 14. Examples of thermal cameras for UAS: (A) FLIR Vue Pro R; (B) ICI 9640 P-Series; (C)
PI 640 8–14 640 × 480 17 2 320
VarioCAM HDx head S; (D) Leonardo DRS TAMARISK Precision; (E) Optris PI 640; (F) Xenics Gobi
MicroCAM 2 8–12 640 × 480 a 17 43 b
640-Series.
Thermoteknix
MicroCAM 3 8–12 640 × 480 a 17 30 b
Xenics Gobi 640-Series 8–14 640 × 480 17 208–263 b
Note: a b
maximum resolution configuration; excluding lens.
 There have been essential advancements in thermal camera miniaturization in recent years.
Lightweight, small-size LWIR imagers, such as those developed by FLIR, were first introduced in a
military context for remote reconnaissance and are becoming more common in UAS-based
remote-sensing applications such as archaeological prospection. Table 7 compiles some existing
Drones 2020, 4, 046 18 of 28
products in the family of thermal sensors, suitable for light UAS (also examples in Figure 14).

Figure 14. Examples of thermal cameras for UAS: (A) FLIR Vue Pro R; (B) ICI 9640 P-Series; (C)
Figure 14. Examples of thermal cameras for UAS: (A) FLIR Vue Pro R; (B) ICI 9640 P-Series; (C)
VarioCAM HDx head S; (D) Leonardo DRS TAMARISK Precision; (E) Optris PI 640; (F) Xenics
VarioCAM HDx head S; (D) Leonardo DRS TAMARISK Precision; (E) Optris PI 640; (F) Xenics Gobi
Gobi 640-Series.
640-Series.
5.7. Ground-Penetrating Radars
A ground-penetrating radar (GPR) is an active non-destructive geophysical sensing technique
that utilizes electromagnetic radiation in the microwave band and has always been entangled with
archaeological prospection for the subsurface mapping of artifacts, features, and patterning [124,125].
Although there are currently no integrated payload solutions for UAS-borne microwave-based detection,
a few recent studies report experiments towards the manufacture of customized systems for GPR
non-destructive applications [126–128].

6. Conclusions
The last decade was marked by a radical miniaturization and integration of UAS-mounted sensors,
which gradually fostered the adoption of low-altitude sensing techniques for archaeological applications,
including but not limited to prospection. Notwithstanding the considerable number of works reviewed
here, UAS-based archaeological remote-sensing applications and, especially, those dealing with the
beyond-visible spectra to identify multi-spectral contrast variations, are still scarce. This is most likely
because the relevant technology has only recently reached a certain level of maturity and high-resolution
solutions remain considerably expensive. The recently observed trends, regarding increasingly more
metrically and radiometrically accurate data-acquisition and data production in archaeological surveys,
and the adoption of well-established processing and analytical techniques from satellite and airborne
sensing, suggest a promising perspective. However, the aspects of spatial precision and accuracy still
remain undocumented in numerous archaeological surveys which suggests a need for better training
regarding metric concepts and for increasing the collaborations between archaeologists and geomatics
experts to achieve optimal results in archaeological remote-sensing projects. Metric, radiometric and
semantic contents of acquired archaeological data and meta-data should not be neglected as they
contain valuable information for archaeological interpretations. It should be further highlighted that
automation in the detection of historical residues remains an undeniably complex and challenging task
due to the unique morphological, stratigraphical, topographical and archaeological characteristics of
each archaeological site [129–131]. For this reason the majority of UAS-borne prospection studies still
depend on the parallel acquisition of data with ground-based geophysical methods such as electrical
resistivity surveys, ground-penetrating radar, electromagnetic conductivity surveys, and magnetic
gradiometry surveys, on historical aerial footage, and on satellite datasets, which complete our
Drones 2020, 4, 046 19 of 28

perspectives over historical terrains. Lastly, the authors would like to point out that, despite the
observed allocation of the analyzed studies on a global scale, the gaps on the relevant map do
not necessarily reflect the contemporary worldwide distribution of archaeological remote-sensing
research. There are various reported examples of innovative archaeological studies in Oceania and
Asia [132–135]—actively using drones—which due to the strictly set selection criteria were excluded
from the presented meta-analysis. The typology of the historical remains also plays a large part in this
distribution anomaly. However, UAS-based remote sensing is widely applied in these areas, mainly
directed towards heritage recording.

Supplementary Materials: The following is available online at http://www.mdpi.com/2504-446X/4/3/046/s1:

Figure S1. PRISMA 2009 flow diagram, Table S2. List of meta-analysis publications.
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, E.A.; Data Curation, E.A.; Methodology, E.A.; Validation, E.A.;
Formal analysis, E.A.; Investigation, E.A.; Resources, E.A.; Writing–Original draft, E.A.; Visualization, E.A.;
Writing–review and editing, E.A. and F.R., Supervision, F.R.; Project administration, F.R.; Funding acquisition F.R.
All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding: This project has received funding from the European Union’s Framework Program for Research and
Innovation Horizon 2020 (2014–2020) under the Marie-Skłodowska Curie Grant Agreement No. 754511 and from
the Compagnia di San Paolo.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

Abbreviations
3D Three-Dimensional
DDSM Differential Digital Surface Models
DEM Digital Elevation Model
DSLR Digital Single-Lens Reflex
DSM Digital Surface Model
DTM Digital Terrain Model
GIS Geographic Information Systems
GNSS Global Navigation Satellite Systems
GPR Ground-Penetrating Radar
HMU Hybrid Measurement Units
HNS Hybrid Navigation System
HOS Hybrid Orientation System
HS Hyper-spectral
IMU Inertial Measurement Units
LiDAR Light Detection and Ranging
LRM Local Relief Modeling
LWIR Long-Wavelength Infrared
MS Multi-spectral
MVS Multiple-View-Stereo
NDVI Normalized Difference Vegetation Index
NIR Near-Infrared
PCA Principal Component Analysis
PPK Post-Processed Kinematic
RGB Red Green Blue
RPAS Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems
RTK Real-Time Kinematic
SfM Structure-from-Motion
SPS Standard Positioning Service
SVF Sky-View Factor
TIR Thermal Infrared
UAS Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
VIS Visible
Drones 2020, 4, 046 20 of 28

Drones 2020, 4,
Drones
x Drones
FOR2020,
PEER4,
Drones
2020,xREVIEW
FOR
4, x2020,
PEER
FOR 4, xREVIEW
PEER FOR PEER REVIEW
REVIEW 23 of 31 23 of2331of 31 23 of 31
Drones 2020, 4,
Drones
x Drones
FOR2020,
PEER4,
Drones
2020,xREVIEW
FOR
4, x2020,
PEER
FOR 4, xREVIEW
PEER FOR PEER REVIEW
REVIEW 23 of 31 23 of2331of 31 23 of 31
AppendixDrones
A. 2020, 4,Drones
x FOR2020,
PEER4,
Drones
xREVIEW
FOR2020,
PEER4, xREVIEW
FOR PEER REVIEW 23 of 31 23 of2331of 31 23 of 31
Drones 2020, 4, x FOR PEER REVIEW
AppendixAppendix
A Appendix Appendix
A A A
Drones 2020, 4,
Drones
x FOR2020,
PEER
Drones 4,
Drones
xREVIEW
2020, FOR
4, x2020,
PEER
FOR 4,PEER
xREVIEW
FOR PEER REVIEW 23 of 31 23 of23
31of 31 23 of 31
AppendixAppendix
A Appendix Appendix
A A A REVIEW
Drones 2020, 4,
Drones
x FOR2020,
PEER
Drones 4,
Drones
xREVIEW
2020, FOR
4, x2020,
PEER
FOR 4,PEER
xREVIEW
FOR PEER REVIEW Table A1. Integrated LiDAR payloads 23 for
of 31UAS. 23 of23
31of 31 23 of 31
AppendixAppendix
A Appendix Appendix
A A A REVIEW Table A1. Integrated
Table A1.LiDAR
Integrated
Table payloads
A1.LiDAR
Integrated
forpayloads
UAS.
LiDARforpayloads
UAS. for UAS.
Table A1. Integrated LiDAR payloads for UAS.
Drones 2020, 4,
Drones
x FOR
2020,
PEER4,
Drones
xREVIEW
FOR2020,
PEER4,
Drones
xREVIEW
FOR2020,
PEER4, xREVIEW Table A1. Integrated
FOR PEER REVIEW Table A1.LiDAR
Table Integrated
Table
A1. payloads
A1.LiDAR
Integrated
Integrated forpayloads
LiDAR UAS.
23 LiDAR
of 31 for
payloadspayloads
UAS.
23 31 for23
forofUAS. UAS.
of 31 23 of 31
AppendixAppendix
A Appendix Appendix
A A Max.
A Range Max. RangeMax. Range
Max. Max. Range
Range Max. Max. Shots/secShots/s
Max. Max.(1000) Accuracy
Shots/sec
Max.
Shots/sec Accuracy
(1000) Weight
Shots/sec
(1000) Accuracy
Weight
(1000)
Accuracy Accuracy
Weight Weight Weight
Brand Brand Model
Brand
Brand Model
Brand Model Model Model FOV FOV(deg)
(deg)
TableFOV (deg)
FOV
A1. Integrated
Table FOV
(deg) (deg)
A1.LiDAR
Table Integrated
Table
A1. Integrated payloads
A1.LiDAR
Integrated forpayloads
LiDAR UAS.
LiDAR
payloads forpayloadsUAS.
for UAS. LiDAR
forLiDAR Sensor
UAS. Sensor
LiDAR LiDARGNSS
Sensor
LiDAR
Sensor IMU
IMUStorageCamera
GNSS
SensorIMU
GNSS Storage
StorageCamera
GNSS
IMU IMUCamera
StorageCamera
StorageCamera
Appendix
Drones Appendix
Ax FOR
2020, 4,
Drones 2020,
PEERAppendix
AxREVIEW
4,
Drones
FOR
4,Ax2020,
PEER4,A (m)Max.
xREVIEW
FOR (m)
PEERRange Max.
REVIEW (m) (m)
Range (m)
Max. RangeReturns
Returns
Max. (1000)
Returns
Returns
Shots/sec
Max. **
Max.(1000)** Returns
Shots/sec
Max. (cm)** (cm)
**
Accuracy
(1000)
23 Shots/sec
of (kg)
**
31 Accuracy(cm)
(kg)
23(cm)
Weight
(1000) of23 (cm)
(kg)
31ofAccuracy
Weight
23Weight (kg)
of (kg)
31 Weight
Brand
Appendix
Drones
Brand
2020,
Model
FOR
Brand Model
PEER REVIEW Max. Range Shots/sec (1000) Accuracy 31
Brand Model Model FOV (deg) FOV (deg)
FOV FOV (deg)
(deg) LiDAR Sensor LiDAR LiDARGNSS
Sensor
LiDAR
IMUStorageCamera
Sensor GNSS
SensorIMU
GNSS StorageCamera
GNSS
IMU IMUStorageCamera
StorageCamera
Scanfly HD2 Scanfly Max.
HD2 (m)Range
Scanfly
120 Max.
HD2 (m)
(V)40,
120 (m)
RangeTable
Max.
(H)360 (m)
(V)40,
120Returns
A1. Integrated
RangeTable
Max.
(H)360 2 2(H)360 Returns
A1.
(V)40, LiDAR
Integrated
Table
Returns
Shots/sec
Max.
(H)360 2300 **
300 2 payloads
A1.Returns
LiDAR
Integrated
(1000)
Shots/sec
Max. 2 5300**for
(cm)
payloads
**
Accuracy
(1000) UAS.
LiDAR
5Shots/sec **for
(cm)
(kg)
payloads
Accuracy
300 Weight
(1000)
1.95 5UAS.
(cm) (cm)
for(kg)
Accuracy
Weight
Velodyne
1.95 5UAS.
(kg) (kg)
Weight
Appendix
Drones
Brand AxScanfly
Appendix
2020, 4,
Drones
FOR 2020,
Drones
Brand
HD2
PEER
BrandAppendix
A
4,
Drones
xREVIEW
2020, FOR
4,
Model x2020,
Brand PEER
FOR 4, 120
Scanfly
Appendix
A xREVIEW
FOR
PEER
Model
Model
HD2
PEER
REVIEW A REVIEW
Model
(V)40,
Max.(H)360
Range
120
FOV (deg) FOV
(V)40,
(deg)
FOV
Table A1.
FOV (deg)
(deg)
Integrated
Max. Shots/sec LiDAR300
23 payloads
(1000)
of 31 1.95 Accuracy
23 for
23
UAS.
of5Velodyne
31 23
of 31 LiDAR of 31Puck
Puck
Weight
1.95 Velodyne
32MR1.95
Velodyne
Sensor
LiDAR
32MRPuck
LiDAR
Velodyne
GNSS
Sensor
32MR
Puck
LiDAR
32MRPuck 32MR *
IMUStorageCamera
Sensor GNSS
SensorIMU
GNSS StorageCamera
GNSS
IMU
* **
IMUStorageCamera
StorageCamera
*
3D Target Scanfly Scanfly
LITE HD2 Scanfly HD2
100
Scanfly (m)
Scanfly
HD2120 HD2 (m)
(V)40,
120
(V)30, (m)Table
(H)360
(H)360
120 (m)
(V)40,
120Returns
A1. Integrated
Table
(H)360
(V)40, 2 2 Returns
A1.
(V)40,
Table
(H)360 LiDAR
Integrated
Table
Returns
(H)360
A1. 2 **
300
Integrated
300 22 (1000) Returns
payloads
A1. LiDAR
Integrated
2 5 **
300 (cm)
for
LiDARpayloads
**
300 5 UAS.
LiDAR
payloads **
300
1.6 (cm)
for(kg)
payloads
1.95 5 UAS.
(cm)
for UAS. (cm)
for(kg)
Velodyne
Velodyne
55 Accuracy 1.95 5 UAS.
(kg)
Puck
1.95 Puck (kg)
Velodyne
1.95
LiteVelodyne32MR Puck
Velodyne
32MR
Puck 32MRPuck 32MR **
3D Target 3D Target Scanfly
3D Target 3D Target
LITE Scanfly LITE
Scanfly
Max.Scanfly
100
LITE RangeLITE (V)30,
Max. 100 (H)360
100
Range (V)30,
Max.
Max. Range 100 (H)360
(V)30,
Range
Max. 2 (V)30,
(H)360 (H)360
Shots/sec
Max. 2 300
Max. Shots/sec
Max. 2 300 300
Accuracy
(1000) 5Shots/sec
Shots/sec (1000) Accuracy 300 1.6
Accuracy
Weight
(1000) 5 Velodyne
1.6
Weight 5 1.6
Weight Puck
Velodyne
1.6
Weight Lite
VelodynePuck
Velodyne
Lite
Puck LitePuck Lite *
* *
* * **
Appendix
Brand Appendix
A Appendix
Brand Appendix
BrandAModelAHD2
Brand 4,A
ModelModel Model FOV (deg)(V)40,
FOV (deg)
FOV FOV (H)360
(deg) (deg) LiDAR Sensor
LiDAR GNSS
Sensor
LiDAR LiDAR
IMU
Sensor StorageCamera
GNSS
SensorIMUIMU
GNSS StorageCamera
GNSS IMUStorageCamera
Drones 2020, 4,
3D Target Drones
x3D
FOR
Scanfly 2020,
PEER
Drones
Target 4,
Drones
ULTRA
3DScanfly
xREVIEW
Scanfly
2020,
Scanfly
Target
FOR
3D4, x2020,
ULTRA
PEER
FOR
Target
LITE
Scanfly
xREVIEW
ScanflyFOR
PEER
Scanfly HD2
Scanfly
PEER
Max.
ULTRA
Scanfly
REVIEW
Scanfly
LITE HD2120
Scanfly
100
(m)
LITE
Scanfly
REVIEW
Range
HD2 (V)40,
Max.
ULTRA
120
(V)40,
LITE (V)30,
100
(m)
Max.
(V)40,
(H)360
(H)360
120
(H)360
100Table
(m)
Range Max.
Range
(H)360
120
(m) (H)360
(V)40,
(V)30,
100 (H)360
Returns
A1. 22 2(H)360
Integrated
Range
(V)40, Table
(V)30,
Max.
(H)360 2
(V)40,
(V)30,
(H)360 (H)360
Returns
A1. LiDAR 22600
Integrated
Table
Shots/sec
(V)40, Max.
(H)360 2
300
300
** 22 payloads
Returns
Max.
600 A1.Returns
LiDAR 22 5300
Integrated
(1000)Table
Shots/sec
Max.
Shots/sec
2 300
** 23
300
(cm)
for
payloads
A1.
300
Accuracy
600 (1000)
5 **
of 31
55UAS.
LiDAR
Integrated
Shots/sec
(1000)
300
0.95
300
** 23
1.95
1.6
(cm)
for(kg)
payloads
Accuracy
600 Weight
(1000)
0.95 5
of523
55UAS.
LiDAR
(cm)5
Accuracy
31ofVelodyne
Velodyne 31 23
1.95
Velodyne
1.6
(cm)
for(kg)
payloads
Accuracy
Weight
Velodyne
0.95 5
of
55UAS. 31Puck
Ultra
1.95
1.6
(kg)
Weight
Velodyne
for1.95
Puck
Puck Velodyne
Velodyne
1.6
(kg)
Weight
Ultra
Velodyne
0.95
32MR
Lite
UAS. Puck
Velodyne
Puck
Velodyne
32MR
Puck
Puck
Velodyne
Puck
Ultra
Velodyne
32MR
Lite
Puck
Puck
LitePuck
Ultra
32MR
Lite
Puck ** StorageCamera ** * ** **
Brand A Brand
Appendix Brand Brand Scanfly
Model Model ULTRA
Model Model FOV (deg) FOV (V)40,
(deg)
FOV
(H)360
FOV (deg)2
(deg)
600 5 LiDAR 0.95 SensorVelodyne
LiDAR Ultra
GNSS
Sensor
LiDAR LiDAR
IMU
Sensor
Puck
StorageCamera
GNSS
SensorIMUIMU
GNSS * StorageCamera
StorageCamera
GNSS * *
IMUStorageCamera *
3D TargetAppendix
3DAppendix
Target
3D
Hovermap Appendix
A
Scanfly
Target
HF1
Scanfly ATarget
3DULTRA
LITE
HD2 A
Scanfly
Scanfly LITE
Scanfly
HD2
100
Scanfly
ULTRA
Scanfly Scanfly
100
(m)
LITE
120
HD2
Scanfly
ULTRA LITE
HD2
ULTRA (V)30,
100
(m)
(V)40,
120 100
360(m)
(H)360
120 (V)30,
100
(m)
(V)40,
120Returns
(V)30,
(H)360
(V)40,
(V)40, 2 2 (V)30,
(H)360 Returns
(V)40,
(H)360
(H)360 (H)360 2 **
Returns
300
300
600 2 2 Returns
22 payloads 2 3 **
300
600 (cm)
300
300
600 5 5** **
300
1.8
600 1.6
(cm)
(kg)
1.95
0.95 5 5 (cm)5
Velodyne
5 Velodyne
1.6
(cm)
(kg)
Velodyne
1.95
Velodyne
0.95 5 5 1.6
(kg)
VLP-16
1.95 Puck
Velodyne
Puck 1.6
(kg)
Velodyne
Ultra1.95
Lite
Velodyne
0.95 Lite
Velodyne
32MR Puck
Velodyne
Puck
Velodyne
Puck Lite
Puck
Velodyne
32MR
Puck
Ultra
Velodyne
PuckLitePuck
Puck
32MR
Ultra Lite
32MR
Puck * * * *
Drones 2020, 4,
Emesent Drones
x FOR Hovermap
2020,
PEER
Drones 4,
Drones
xREVIEW
2020, FOR HF1
Hovermap
4, x2020,
PEER
FOR 4, xREVIEW
FOR
Hovermap
PEER HF1
Hovermap
PEER
Max.
REVIEW 100
HF1 REVIEW
Range HF1100
Max. 360
100
Range Max.100
Table 360
A1. Integrated
RangeTable
Max. 2360
Max. 360
A1. LiDAR
RangeIntegrated
Table
Shots/sec
Table Max.
A1. 2 300
Integrated A1. LiDAR 2 300
Integrated
(1000)
Shots/sec
Max. for 23
payloads
300
Accuracy
LiDAR (1000) 3Shots/sec
of
UAS. 31 300
LiDAR
Max.
payloads for 1.8
23
payloads
Accuracy
Weight
(1000) of5
3Shots/sec
UAS.
for 323 31 Velodyne
for 1.8
23
ofAccuracy
UAS. Weight
31(1000) 0.95
3UAS.
of 31VLP-16
1.8 Velodyne
Velodyne
1.8LiteVLP-16
Velodyne
Accuracy
Weight Ultra
Velodyne
VLP-16
Weight Puck
LiteVLP-16 Lite
Lite **
Emesent
Brand HovermapEmesent
Brand
Emesent
Scanfly
VF1
Scanfly Emesent
Model
Brand
HD2
ULTRA Model
Scanfly
Scanfly Brand
HD2
100
Scanfly
ULTRA HD2
ScanflyModel
Scanfly
120 HD2
ULTRA FOVModel
(V)40,
120
360 (deg)(V)40,
(H)360
120 FOV
120 (deg)
(H)360
(V)40, 2 2 FOV (H)360
(V)40,
(H)360 (deg) 2 300
300
600 2FOV (deg) 2 3300
600 300 5 300
1.8
600 1.95
0.95 5 Velodyne
5 LiDAR
Velodyne
1.95
Velodyne
0.95 5 VLP-16
1.95 Sensor
Puck LiDAR
Velodyne
Ultra1.95
Lite
Velodyne
0.95 32MR GNSS
Sensor
Puck
Velodyne
Puck LiDAR
IMU
Velodyne
32MR
Puck
Ultra
Velodyne
Puck StorageCamera
GNSS
Sensor
Puck
32MR
UltraLiDAR
IMUStorageCamera
32MR
Puck GNSS
SensorIMUStorageCamera GNSSIMUStorageCamera
3D TargetAppendix
Appendix A3DAppendix
Target
3D Scanfly
A3DATarget
Hovermap
Appendix
Target LITE
HF1
VF1 Scanfly
Scanfly
Hovermap
AScanfly
Hovermap ULTRA
LITE Scanfly
HF1
VF1 100
VF1 LITE
Hovermap
(m)
LITE
HF1 (V)30,
HF1
VF1 100360
(m) (H)360
100
100 (V)40,
(V)30,
100
(m) (H)360
360
Returns
(V)30, (H)360
2360(H)360
(V)30,
(m) (H)360
360
Returns 2 300
** 2 Returns
22 payloads 2 300 600
**for
(cm)
300
300 3 Returns 300
**for 1.6
1.8
(cm)
(kg) 5
3 35 Velodyne Velodyne
**for 1.6
1.8
(cm)
(kg) 0.95
3 1.8 Puck Velodyne
Velodyne
1.6
Velodyne
1.6VLP-161.8
(cm)
(kg)
Velodyne Lite Ultra
Puck
Velodyne
Lite
Velodyne
Velodyne (kg)
LiteVLP-16Puck
VLP-16 PuckPuck Lite
LiteLite
VLP-16
Lite Lite * * *
* *** **
Max.
PEERRange Max.Max.RangeTable
Max.A1. Integrated
RangeTable
Max. A1.
Table LiDAR
Integrated
Table
A1.
Shots/sec
Max. Integrated A1. LiDAR
Integrated
(1000)
Shots/sec
Max. LiDARpayloads
Accuracy
(1000) UAS.
LiDAR
payloads
Shots/sec
31 Accuracy payloads
Weight
(1000) UAS.
for UAS. UAS.
Emesent
Drones
3D
2020, 4,
Brand
Target
xEmesent
Drones
FOR
3D
Emesent
2020,
PEER
Drones
Brand
Target
4,
2020,
Scanfly
Hovermap
Emesent
Drones
xREVIEW
FOR
3D4,
Model x2020,
Brand PEER
FOR
Target
LITE
4,PEER
xREVIEW
Scanfly
HF1
Hovermap
FOR
Model REVIEW
LITE Scanfly
HF1 100
Hovermap
REVIEW
ModelLITE FOV
(V)30,
HF1 100
Range
(deg)
(H)360
360 FOV
(V)30,
100 (deg)
(H)360
360 2 FOV
(V)30, (deg)
(H)360
360 2
Max.
300
Shots/sec
2 300
23
5
3
(1000)
of
300
23
1.6
1.8 5
3
Accuracy
of23 31ofAccuracy
Weight
31 23
LiDAR
Velodyne
1.6
Velodyne
1.8 5
3
of 31 Weight
Weight
Sensor
PuckLiDAR
Velodyne
VLP-161.6
Velodyne
1.8 Lite
Lite GNSS
Sensor
PuckLiDAR
IMU
Velodyne
VLP-16 Lite
Velodyne Lite StorageCamera
GNSS
Sensor
Puck
VLP-16 IMU
Lite
Lite StorageCamera
GNSS IMU StorageCamera
GeoCueTrueGeoCue
GeoCue Group 3DBrand
Target
GeoCue
View 410
Scanfly GeoCue
3DIS HD2
ULTRA VF1Hovermap
Scanfly Model
Scanfly
HD2
200
ULTRAVF1LITE
HF1
120 HD2
VF1 ULTRA
Scanfly VF1
(V)40,
(V)20, 100
100
Scanfly
120(H)360
HD2
(H)360(V)40,
120 FOV
(V)30,
(H)360 360 (deg)
(H)360
(V)40,
120Returns
3(H)360 430 22 Returns
(V)40, (H)360 3600 300
300 2 2600 1.95 35Quanergy
300 1.95 1.6Puck
1.8
M8-Ultra Velodyne
1.95 532MR LiDAR
Velodyne
Puck Sensor
Puck
1.95
32MR
VLP-16 Lite
Puck GNSS
Velodyne
Lite 32MR IMU
Puck Puck * 32MR * ** StorageCamera
EmesentAppendix
Appendix True
A Emesent View
Emesent
Appendix A410
True
A Emesent
Appendix 3DIS
TrueScanfly
View
A View 410
TrueULTRA
Max.
(m)
3DIS
410200
View
3DIS410
Range
(m)
(V)20,
Max.3DIS
200 (m)
(H)360
200
Range
(V)40,
(m)
(V)20,
Max. 200Returns32 (H)360
(H)360
(V)20,
Range
Max. (V)20, (H)360
(H)360
Shots/sec
Max. 32Returns
600
**
43032 (1000) 32 430
Shots/sec
Max. 430
Accuracy35**
600
** (cm)
(1000) 430 0.95
** (cm)352 (cm)
(kg) 35 Accuracy
Velodyne
0.95
(cm)352 (kg)
(kg)
Quanergy 0.95Ultra
Velodyne
0.95
(kg)
2 M8-Ultra
Quanergy 2Puck Ultra
Velodyne
Quanergy
Velodyne
PuckPuck
Ultra
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
M8-Ultra
Ultra
M8-Ultra * *
3D
Group
GeoCue
Brand
DronesTarget
2020, 4, 3D
Drones
x
Group
FOR Group
GeoCueHovermap
GeoCue
BrandScanfly
Brand
Target
Scanfly
2020,
PEER4, 3D
Drones
x
Hovermap
Group
GeoCue
ULTRA
Model
Brand VF1
Hovermap
Target
LITE
REVIEW
FOR 2020,
PEER
HF1 Hovermap
Scanfly
4, ULTRA
Model
Scanfly
Scanfly
3D
Drones
x
Hovermap VF1
Hovermap
Model
REVIEW
FOR 100
VF1
Scanfly
ULTRA
Target
LITE Scanfly
2020,
PEER
HF1 100
4,
Hovermapx ULTRA
ModelLITE
REVIEW
FOR VF1 Max.
100
(V)40,
FOV
(V)30,360
100
Scanfly
PEER
HF1 100
Range
Table
(H)360
(deg)
LITE
REVIEW
360
A1.
100
(V)40,
FOV Integrated
360Table
(H)360
(deg)
(V)40,
(V)30,
100 FOV
360 2 2
A1.
2360(H)360
Table
(V)40,
FOV
(deg)
(V)30,
100
LiDAR
360
360
Integrated
Table
A1.
(H)360
(deg) 2 2
Max.
2 600
300
Integrated
300 2
(V)30, 2
Shots/sec
payloads
A1. LiDAR
Integrated
(H)360 2 2 600
2 300
300
for
LiDARpayloads
300
600
23 5 3Shots/sec
3
UAS.(1000)
LiDAR
payloads
of 31 2
Accuracy
300
600
300
Weight
for(1000)
payloads
1.8
0.95
1.6
23
1.8 5 3Accuracy
3
UAS.
for
of 3 5 UAS.
31 300
Weight
for
Velodyne
1.8
Velodyne
0.95
LiDAR
Velodyne
1.6
23
Velodyne
1.8 5 3
Weight
3UAS.
of1.8
0.95
31
Weight
VLP-16
Velodyne
Ultra
Puck 1.8
Velodyne
Velodyne
0.95
Sensor
LiDAR
Velodyne
VLP-161.6
23
Velodyne
1.8 5 Lite
Puck VLP-16
Velodyne
of Velodyne
LiDAR
Lite31
Lite VLP-16
Ultra
Velodyne
GNSS
Sensor
PuckUltra
VLP-16 Lite
Puck
LiDAR
IMU
Sensor
Velodyne
1.6
Lite
Velodyne LiteVLP-16
Lite
Ultra
Sensor
Puck
Puck
VLP-16 Lite
Puck
StorageCamera
GNSS IMU
GNSS
Velodyne
Lite
Lite StorageCamera
GNSS
IMU
Puck
* IMU
Lite StorageCamera
StorageCamera
* *
Geo-MMS TrueLiDAR
ViewM8 HD2
410
True 3DIS
TrueHovermap
View HD2
150
410
True
Scanfly
View 3DIS
HD2
410 HF1
120
200
View
(m) HD2
3DIS410 (V)40,
120
(V)20, 100
(H)360
200(H)360
(V)20,
3DIS
(m) 120
200 (V)40,
120
(V)20,
200 (H)360
(V)40,
(V)20,
(m)Returns 360
3 3(H)360 (V)40,
(V)20,
(H)360 (H)360
Returns 3430 430
**3 2 3 3430
Returns 300
430
** (cm)35 430 1.95
** (cm)352 35Quanergy
(kg) 3 1.95
352 1.95
Quanergy
(cm)
(kg) 1.8
2 Puck
M8-Core 1.95
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
(kg) Velodyne
32MR
2 Puck
Quanergy VLP-16
32MR
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
Puck Lite
Puck
32MR
M8-Ultra 32MR *
M8-Ultra * ** * *
Emesent
Group
GeoCue Emesent
Geo-MMS
Group
Emesent
Group
GeoCue Emesent
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Group
GeoCue M8 LiDAR
Geo-MMS Geo-MMS
LiDAR150
M8 M8LiDAR (V)20,
150 (m)
M8150
(H)360(V)20,
150 (H)360
(V)20, 3 (H)360 (V)20, 3Returns
(H)360 430
3 3 430 3**
430 430 3 (cm) 3 Velodyne 3 (kg) M8-Core
Quanergy Quanergy Quanergy M8-Core
Quanergy
M8-CoreM8-Core
Appendix Appendix
Ax3D GeoCueAppendix
AxREVIEW
Hovermap HF1 A
Hovermap HF1
Hovermap
100 HF1 100360 100360 2360 360 2 430
300 2 430
300
Drones
3D 2020,
Target Geo-MMS
4,
DronesAppendix
FORTrue
2020,
3D
LiDAR
PEER
Target View
Scanfly
4,
Drones
Scanfly
Target A410
ULTRA
FOR
3D VF1
True 3DIS
2020,
HD2PEER
Target
LITE 4,Hovermap
View
Scanfly
True
Drones
x 410
ULTRA
View
REVIEW
ScanflyFOR VF1
Max.
True 3DIS
Scanfly
410
2020,
Scanfly
HD2
100 PEER
LITE 4,
LITE
Range
HF1
VF1
200
View
120x
Scanfly
100 410
ULTRA
3DIS
REVIEW
FOR
LITE
HD2
VF1
Max.
PEER Range
(V)20,
3DIS
200
Max.
Scanfly
(V)40,
(V)30,
100
(V)40,
120
100
200
REVIEW
360100
Max.
(H)360
Range
ULTRA
(H)360
Range
(V)20,
200
(V)40,
Table A1.
(V)30,
100 Max.
(H)360
(V)20, 32 2
Integrated
Table
(V)30,
(V)40,
120 (H)360 2
Shots/sec
(V)20,
(V)40,
(H)360
A1.
(V)30,
Table
(H)360
(V)40,
Max.
(H)360
LiDAR 32 2
Integrated
Table
A1.
(H)360 Max.
600
(V)40,
3
Integrated
300
300 2
(1000)
Shots/sec
A1. Max.
2 payloads
LiDAR32
Shots/sec
(H)360 2
Integrated 5
Accuracy
600 430
for
LiDAR
300 3553Shots/sec
(1000)
300
payloads
23
300 UAS.(1000)
LiDAR
of 31 2
payloads
300
430
600
300
1.59 for 1.8
3553Accuracy
Accuracy
Weight
(1000)
0.95
payloads
23
1.6
1.95 2for
UAS.
of3 331
5UAS. for 1.8
Accuracy3553UAS.
Weight
Quanergy
600
Velodyne
0.95
23
Velodyne
1.6
Velodyne
Velodyne1.95 of 1.8
2Weight
2
31
1.6
Velodyne
VLP-16
Puck
1.8
Weight
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
Ultra
Velodyne
0.95
23
Velodyne
Puck 1.6
Velodyne
VLP-16 1.95 5 Lite
Velodyne
2Puck
Quanergy
of
Lite
32MR 31 Velodyne
VLP-16
M8-Ultra
Puck
Velodyne
LiteVLP-16
VLP-16
Quanergy
Ultra
Velodyne
0.95
Puck
M8-Ultra
Velodyne
Puck Lite
Puck
Velodyne
32MR Lite
Puck
Lite
Puck
Lite Ultra Puck
M8-Ultra
Ultra
Velodyne
Puck
Lite
32MR *
GeodeticsEmesent
Brand
Group Emesent
Brand
Geo-MMS
Group
Emesent
Brand
Geo-MMS
Group Emesent
Model
Brand
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Group
LiDAR
Geo-MMS Model
M8
VLP-16
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Model
LiDAR
Geo-MMS HD2 Model
150
M8
VLP-16
LiDAR
LiDAR 100 LiDAR
LiDAR
M8
VLP-16 FOV
(V)20,
150
M8
VLP-16
100 120
(H)360
360
150
100 (V)40,
(deg)(V)20,
FOV
150
100 (deg)
(H)360
FOV
360
(V)20, 32 (H)360 FOV
(V)20,
(deg) 360(deg)
(H)360
32 430 300
32 32 430 300 35
430 430
300 35 35
1.59 LiDAR
Quanergy
35 1.59
Velodyne
1.59 1.95Sensor
LiDAR
M8-Core
Quanergy
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.59 VelodyneGNSS
LiDAR
Quanergy Puck
Sensor
LiDAR
M8-CoreIMU
Quanergy
Sensor
VLP-16
Velodyne32MR
M8-Core StorageCamera
GNSS
SensorIMUIMU
M8-Core
GNSS
VLP-16 *
StorageCamera
GNSS *
IMUStorageCamera
StorageCamera * *
GeoCue VLP-16
GeoCueHovermap
GeoCue
Hovermap GeoCue VF1
Hovermap
HF1 Hovermap
Hovermap VF1
HF1
(m)
Hovermap
100
VF1 HF1
Hovermap
100 VF1(m)
100360
360
Hovermap
100 (m)
100 HF1 (m)
10036022360
100Returns
360 360 100Returns
36022Returns
360
**
300
300 2 Returns
360 2 300
2 300 300
** (cm)
300 3** 2 300
3
** (cm)
300 (kg)
1.8
1.8 3 (cm)
3 3 300 (cm)
(kg)
Velodyne
1.8
Velodyne
1.8 3 (kg)
3
(kg)
1.8VLP-16
Velodyne
VLP-161.8
Velodyne
1.8 3
Velodyne
Lite
Velodyne
LiteVLP-16
VLP-16
VLP-16
Velodyne
Velodyne
1.8 Lite
VLP-16
LiteVLP-16
Lite
VLP-16 Lite
Velodyne
Lite VLP-16 Lite
Drones 2020, Geo-MMS
Appendix
3D Target 4,
Drones
Ax3D
AppendixTrue
Geo-MMS
FOR 2020,
PEERView
Scanfly
4,
Drones
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
Target LiDAR
Appendix
Scanfly
3D 410
True
ULTRA
LiDAR 3DIS
Geo-MMS
AxREVIEW
FOR 2020,
LiDAR
Target
LITE View
Scanfly
True
PEER M8
4,
Drones
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS 410
True
ULTRA
View
LiDAR
xREVIEW
VLP-16FOR
LiDAR
Appendix
A
Scanfly 3DIS
Geo-MMS
2020,
PEER
LiDAR 200
View
Scanfly
410
150
4,M8
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
LITE
Scanfly
Geo-MMS ULTRA
LiDAR A x
VLP-16
100
Scanfly 410
ULTRA
3DIS
LiDAR
REVIEW
FOR
LITE
M8 (V)20,
3DIS
PEER
LiDAR
LiDAR 200
(V)40,
150
M8
(V)30, (H)360
200
REVIEW
VLP-16
100360
(H)360
150 (V)20,
200
(V)40,
100
(V)30, (H)360
(V)20,
150360 3
(H)360
(V)40,
(V)20, 2360 (V)20,
(V)40, (H)360
360
(V)30,
(H)360
(H)360 (H)3603 430
600
2 300 3232 payloads 3 2 300430
600 3
430
23
600
430 of(1000)
5Shots/sec31 300 430
600 3
0.95
23
1.59
1.6 2
5UAS. of3 Quanergy
531 Accuracy 3
Velodyne
0.95
23
Velodyne
1.59
Velodyne
1.6 2 of
5 Weight31
0.95 M8-Ultra
Quanergy
2 Ultra
Velodyne
Puck0.95
M8-Core
23
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.59
Velodyne
1.6 2Puck
Lite
Velodyne M8-Ultra
Quanergy
of 31Ultra
QuanergyVelodyne
VLP-16Puck
M8-Ultra
M8-Core
Velodyne
Puck
Velodyne
LitePuck
Ultra M8-Ultra
Ultra Puck
M8-Core
VLP-16
Puck Lite
Emesent
Group
GeoCue 3D
Emesent
Group
GeoCue
LiDAR
Target
Group
ScanflyEmesent
Group
GeoCue
HD2
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
Scanfly
Max.
LiDAR
Scanfly
Emesent
HD2 LITERange
LiDARVLP-16
Scanfly
120
100
Max.
HD2
Range
Max.
120
(V)40,
100
100
100 Max.
Range
Table
(H)360
Range
120
(V)40,
100
Max.
(V)30,
A1. Integrated
Table
(H)360
22 2(H)360
Shots/sec
A1.
Table
(V)40,
Max.
LiDAR
Integrated
Table
A1.
(H)360
22700 Max.
300
70022 A1.
Integrated (1000)
Shots/sec
Max.
Shots/sec
LiDAR
Integrated Accuracy
300for
LiDAR (1000)
300
300
payloads
65UAS. LiDAR
payloads Accuracy
300
Weight
for(1000)
payloads
1.95 for3655UAS.
65Accuracy
Weight
for
Velodyne65UAS.
1.95
1.59
1.6 Weight
Puck
Velodyne
1.95
Quanergy
Velodyne
Velodyne
32MR Puck
M8-Core
VLP-16
Puck
Velodyne
32MR Lite
Puck 32MR * * * *
Brand
Drones 2020, 4,
Drones
GeoCue
BrandBrand
VLP-32E
x Geo-MMS
FOR 2020,
PEER
Model
Hovermap
True View Brand
VLP-32E
4,
Drones
Geo-MMS 410
xREVIEW
Hovermap FOR
LiDAR VF1
TrueHovermap
3DIS
2020,
PEER
LiDAR View
100
Scanfly
ModelModel
VLP-32E
True
4,
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMSHF1VLP-16
Hovermap 410
View
Drones
xREVIEW
FOR
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS VF1
2020,
HD2
PEER
LiDAR
Model
Hovermap
True 100
3DIS
200
View
VLP-32E
410
(m)
4,
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
VLP-32E
HF1 x
VLP-16
100
Hovermap
LiDAR LiDAR 410
3DIS
REVIEW
FOR
(V)40,
VF1FOV
PEER
LiDAR
LiDAR
VLP-16 (m)
(H)360
Hovermap
100
(V)20,
3DIS
VLP-16
HF1 100
120
360(deg)
100
200REVIEW
200
360
(m)
100 VF1
(H)360 FOV(V)40,
100
(V)20,
200 (deg)
(V)40,
FOV
360
(H)360
(V)20,
(m)
100Returns
360 32360 (H)360
FOV
(deg)
(H)360360
(deg)
100Returns
360
(V)20, (H)360 300
32Returns
430
**
300 2 3602
32 Returns 322 430
6700
300
300
300
700353** of 31
430
** (cm)
23
300
700
2 430
300 1.8
** (cm)
300 3532 of
(kg)
23
1.59
1.8 (cm)
5 3331 300
Velodyne
Velodyne LiDAR
Velodyne
1.8
Quanergy
(cm)3532 of
(kg)
23
Velodyne
1.59
Velodyne
1.8
1.95
31
(kg)
1.59
VLP-32E
VLP-32EVelodyne
Sensor
2VLP-16
LiDAR
Velodyne
1.8
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
(kg)
23
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.59
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.8 3Velodyne
LiDAR
Lite
Quanergy
of
Lite
VLP-32E
Velodyne
GNSSPuck
Sensor
2Velodyne LiDAR
31VLP-16
IMU
VLP-32E
Sensor
Velodyne
1.8
M8-Ultra
Quanergy 32MR
Lite
M8-Ultra
VLP-16
Velodyne
VLP-16
Velodyne
Velodyne Lite
VLP-16
VLP-32E
StorageCamera
GNSS
Sensor
VLP-16 IMU
GNSS
Velodyne
Lite
M8-Ultra
VLP-16
VLP-16 Lite
StorageCamera
GNSS
IMU * StorageCamera
VLP-16 IMU
Lite StorageCamera
* * *
Geodetics
Group
Appendix Appendix
A Scanfly
Geodetics
Geo-MMS
Group ULTRA
Geodetics
LiDAR
Appendix
A
Geodetics
Group Geo-MMS
Group Hovermap
Scanfly
M8 ULTRA
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Appendix
AScanfly
Geo-MMS ULTRA
LiDARHF1
Scanfly
150
M8
A
100 ULTRA
LiDAR
M8 (V)40,
(V)20,
150
M8
(V)40,
100 100
(H)360
150
(H)360(V)40,
(V)20,
150 (H)360
(V)40,
(V)20,
(V)40,
100 3
(H)360
2 2 360 (V)40,
(V)20,
(H)360
(V)40, (H)360
3
(H)360
2 2 600
430
700 32 32 2 600
430
700 300
3
600
430
6 5 600
430
700 0.95
3 6 5 3 Velodyne
0.95
Quanergy
5 Velodyne 3
Velodyne
6 5 1.8Ultra
Velodyne
0.95
M8-Core
Quanergy
0.95Puck
VLP-32E
Velodyne Velodyne
Puck
Velodyne
Quanergy VLP-16
Ultra
Velodyne
Puck
M8-Core
Quanergy
Ultra
M8-Core
VLP-32E
Velodyne Lite
Ultra Puck
M8-Core
Puck
VLP-32E * * *
Emesent
3D Target
GeoCueGeo-MMS Emesent
3D Target
Scanfly
Emesent
3D
GeoCue LiDAR
TargetEmesent
3D Target
LITE
GeoCue Scanfly LITE
Max.
Scanfly
GeoCue Scanfly
100
LITERangeLITE (V)30,
100
Max.Max. 100
(H)360
Range
100 (V)40,
(V)30,
100
Max.A1.
Range (H)360
Range
Max.
(V)30, 2 (H)360
(V)30, (H)360
Shots/sec
(H)360 Max. 2 3002
Max. 2 (1000)
Shots/sec
Max. 2
Shots/sec 300 700
Accuracy
(1000)
300 5Shots/sec
(1000) 300 1.6
Accuracy
Weight
(1000) 5 6
Accuracy 5 Accuracy 1.6
Weight 5 Weight Velodyne
1.6
Weight
1.6Puck Velodyne
Lite Puck
Velodyne VLP-32E
Velodyne
Lite
Puck Puck
Lite Lite * * * * *
Geo-MMS
VLP-32E
Geo-MMS
Scanfly LiDAR
Geo-MMS
LiDAR VLP-32E
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
HD2 Scanfly LiDAR
Geo-MMS
LiDAR VLP-32E
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
VLP-32E
HD2 Scanfly
120 LiDAR
LiDAR
HD2 (V)40,
120 Table
(H)360(V)40,
120 Integrated
Table
(H)360 2360 A1.
(V)40, LiDAR
Integrated
Table
(H)360 2600300 2 payloads
A1. LiDAR
Integrated
Table 2 3430
300forpayloads
A1. UAS.
LiDAR
Integrated for
payloads UAS.
LiDAR for
payloads UAS. for UAS.
Brand
Geodetics
Drones 2020, 4,
DronesBrand
FOR Hovermap
True
2020,
PEER
VLP-32C 4,Model
View
Brand
xGeodetics
Geo-MMS Drones
Geodetics
Geo-MMS Brand
410
xREVIEW
Hovermap FOR
LiDAR VF1
True
Geodetics
LiDAR
2020,
Geo-MMS Geo-MMS
Hovermap
3DIS
Geo-MMS
PEER
HF1 4, 200
Scanfly
Model
Hovermap
View
M8
Drones 410
xREVIEW
VLP-16
Hovermap
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS FOR
LiDAR VF1
True
Model
LiDAR
2020,
Hovermap
LiDAR
Hovermap
PEER
Geo-MMS
HF1 100
HD2
3DIS
Geo-MMS
LiDAR
LiDAR Model
VF1
View
150
4,M8
200 410
xREVIEW
VLP-16
100
Hovermap
HF1
(m) FOR
LiDAR
M8
VLP-16
(V)40,
VF1
True
LiDAR 100
FOV
3DIS
(V)40,
PEER200(H)360
360
View
(V)20,
150
M8
VLP-16
HF1 100
(V)40,
(m)
120
(deg)
100
(H)360
REVIEW
360
150
200
100
(H)360
100
100
FOV
410(V)40,
3DIS
(V)20,
150
200
100360
(V)40,
(deg)
FOV 32
(H)360
360
(V)20,
(V)40,
(V)40, (H)360
(V)40,
(m) 2
Returns
2(H)360
360(H)360
FOV
200
(deg) 360
(V)20,
(V)40,
(H)360
(V)40,
(H)360
(deg)
32
(H)360
360
(H)360
Returns2 (V)20,
430
600
300
700
**232
2 (H)360
32
2
Returns 600
300
700
** 36553 of 31
300
23
430
600
300
700
(cm)
3 430300
600
300
700
**
1.95
365532 of6
1.8
23
1.59
1.8
(cm)
(kg) 3355331 Velodyne
430 1.95
365532 ofVLP-32C
Velodyne
1.8
LiDAR
Quanergy
Velodyne
23
Velodyne
1.59
Velodyne
1.8
Velodyne
(cm)
(kg) 31VLP-16
1.95
1.8
1.59
1.8
1.95
Velodyne
1.8
Sensor
LiDAR
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
M8-Core
VLP-32C
Velodyne
VLP-1623
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.59
Velodyne
1.8
VLP-32E
Velodyne
(kg)
32MR
Lite
Velodyne
3Velodyne of
LitePuck
31VLP-16
2Velodyne
LiDAR 32MR
Velodyne
GNSSPuck
Sensor
LiDAR
VLP-32C Lite
IMU
VLP-16
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
2VLP-16
Sensor
M8-Core
Velodyne
VLP-16
Velodyne
VLP-16
Velodyne
Quanergy
Velodyne
VelodyneVLP-32E Lite
M8-Core
VLP-32C
Velodyne
VLP-16
VLP-32E
Puck
VLP-16
32MR
Lite 32MR
VLP-32C
VLP-16
VLP-16
VLP-32E
Lite
Lite
StorageCamera
GNSS
SensorIMU
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
GNSS
M8-Core StorageCamera
GNSS
LiteIMUM8-Ultra
* StorageCamera IMUStorageCamera
* * *
Appendix
Group
Emesent Appendix
A Group
Emesent Appendix
A
Scanfly Group
VLP-32C
Geo-MMS
VLP-32E
Emesent LiDAR
ULTRA
Emesent Appendix
A
Geo-MMS
Scanfly Group
VLP-32C
VLP-32E
Geo-MMS
ScanflyLiDAR
Geo-MMS
VLP-32C
ULTRA
VLP-32E A
VLP-32C
Scanfly
VLP-32E
LiDAR
ULTRA LiDAR
ULTRA (V)40, (m)
(H)360(V)40, (H)360
(V)40, 2 (V)40,
(H)360 (H)360 2 Returns
600 2 2 600 600 5 ** 600 0.95 5 (cm) 5 Velodyne
0.95 5 (kg)
0.95Ultra
Velodyne
0.95 Puck
VelodyneUltra
Velodyne
Puck
Ultra Ultra
Puck Puck * * *
GeoCue
Geodetics
3D
DronesTarget GeoCue
x3D
2020, Geo-MMS
4,
Drones
FOR GeoCue
Geodetics
Target
Scanfly
2020,LiDAR
PEER4,
Geodetics
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
3DHovermap GeoCue
Geodetics
3D
Drones
xLiDAR
Target Target
LITE
REVIEW
FOR Scanfly
2020,
PEER
LiDAR 4,
Drones
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMSVF1 x
VLP-16 LITE
REVIEW
FOR
LiDAR
Hovermap
Geo-MMS Scanfly
2020,
PEER
LiDAR 200
4,
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
Scanfly
Max.
VF1 x
VLP-16
100
LITERange
Hovermap
LiDAR LITE
REVIEW
FOR (V)30,
(V)40,
PEER
LiDAR
LiDARMax.
VLP-16 200
VLP-16
VF1 100360 Table
(H)360
REVIEW
100
Range
200 Max. A1.
(V)30,
(V)40,
200
100 Integrated
360Table
(H)360
(V)30,
Range
Max.
(V)40, 2 A1.
(V)30,
(V)40,
(H)360
Max. LiDAR
360
Range
(H)360 Integrated
Table
(H)360
2
Shots/sec
Max. 600
3002 2 payloads
A1. LiDAR
Integrated
(1000)Table
2
Shots/sec
Max. 600
300for
payloads
A1.
233
300
Accuracy 5
(1000)
600 UAS.
LiDAR
Integrated
of 31
Shots/sec
Max. 600
300for
payloads
1.6
233
1.59
Accuracy
Weight 5
(1000)
1.8 UAS.
LiDAR
of
Shots/sec
3 531 for
payloads
Velodyne
Teledyne 1.6
233
Velodyne
1.59
Accuracy
Weight
(1000)
Velodyne
1.8 5 UAS.
of 31
1.6 for
Puck
Velodyne
1.6
VLP-32C
Optech 23
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.59
Accuracy
Weight
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.8 UAS.
Lite
of 31 Puck
Velodyne
Velodyne
Lite Velodyne
VLP-32C
VLP-16Lite
Velodyne
Puck
Weight
VLP-32C
VLP-16
Velodyne Lite Puck Lite
VLP-32C
VLP-16
Lite
VLP-16 Lite *
Appendix
Brand Appendix
A GroupTrue
Geo-MMS
Brand View
Appendix
A
Scanfly
VLP-32C
Geo-MMSModel 410
True
LiDAR
Brand 3DIS
Geo-MMS
HD2
LiDAR
Geo-MMSHovermap
View
M8
Scanfly 410
True
Appendix
A
True View
LiDAR
775
VLP-32C
Scanfly
Model
Brand 3DIS
Geo-MMS
HD2
LiDAR VF1
200
View
410A
150
M8
Scanfly
120
VLP-32C
HD2
100
Geo-MMS
VLP-32C
Geo-MMS Model
LiDAR
410
3DIS
LiDAR
LiDAR3DIS
Geo-MMS
HD2 200
(V)20,
150
M8
(V)40,
120
FOV360
100 100
200
(H)360
LiDAR
120
(H)360
Model
(deg)
100 200
(V)20,
(V)20,
150
M8
(V)40,
120
100
FOV 32360
(H)360
(H)360
(deg)
(V)40, (H)360
(V)20,
150 (H)360
(V)40,
4(H)360
FOV (H)360
32310
(deg) 430
(V)20,
300
700 32FOV (H)360
2 32 1430
(deg) 300
700 300
430
365
300
700 3 430 300
700 3652 365 430
1.95 3652 1.59
Quanergy
Teledyne
Velodyne
1.95
Velodyne
LiDAR 1.8
2 Puck
1.95 3Velodyne
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
M8-Core
Optech
Teledyne
Velodyne
1.95
VLP-32E
Velodyne
Sensor
LiDAR
Velodyne
2Quanergy
32MR Optech
Puck
Teledyne
Velodyne
VLP-16
VLP-16
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
M8-Ultra
M8-Core
Teledyne
Velodyne
GNSS
Sensor
Velodyne 32MR
Optech
Puck
VLP-32E
Velodyne
LiDAR
IMU Lite
32MR
VLP-32E M8-Ultra
M8-Core
Quanergy
Optech
Puck 32MR
VLP-32E
StorageCamera
GNSS
Sensor
LiDAR
IMU
*
M8-Core
StorageCamera
GNSS
Sensor
* IMU
* *
StorageCamera
GNSS
* *IMU
*
StorageCamera
*
Group Hovermap
Group
CL-360
Geo-MMS Group
LiDAR
Geo-MMSHF1
Hovermap
Hovermap
CL-360
Geo-MMS LiDAR HF1
Hovermap
Geo-MMS
LiDAR 100
HF1
CL-360
775 LiDAR
CL-360 HF1 100360
CL-360 100
775REVIEW
360
775 100
775360
360 2423602 360 360
360 2
242 600 300
310 2 2
242 600 300
310 300 3
315UAS. 300
310 1.8 3
315UAS. 3 Velodyne
1.8
CL-360 3
315UAS. 1.8VLP-16
Velodyne
1.8 Lite
VelodyneVLP-16
Velodyne Lite
VLP-16 VLP-16
Lite Lite
Drones 2020, 4,
GeoCue
Emesent
Geodetics Drones
xEmesent
FOR 2020,
PEER
Geodetics
VLP-32E
4,
Drones
Geo-MMS
GeoCue
GeoCue
Scanfly
Emesent
Geodetics
Geo-MMS
xREVIEW
FOR 2020,
EmesentPEER
LiDAR
GeoCue
ULTRA
Geodetics
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
VLP-32E
4,
Drones
Geo-MMS xREVIEW
FOR
Geo-MMS
Scanfly
Scanfly
VLP-16
LiDAR
2020,
ULTRAPEER
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
VLP-32E
(m)
200
4,
Geo-MMS
VLP-32E
ULTRA
Max.
xREVIEW
LiDAR
Scanfly
VLP-16
FOR
ULTRA
LiDAR
PEER
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Range Max.
(m)
(V)40,
200
(V)40,
VLP-16
(H)360
200
(H)360
LiDAR
360
RangeTable (m)
(V)40,
200Returns
A1.
VLP-16
Max.
(H)360
(V)40,
(V)40, (H)360
Integrated
360
RangeTable
(V)40,
Max. Max.
(m)
(H)360 Returns
(V)40,
(V)40,
A1.
(H)360
100
(H)360
(H)360
LiDAR
360
RangeIntegrated
Table
Shots/sec
Max.
**
600
300242 payloads
A1.Returns
LiDAR
Integrated
360
(1000)Table
Shots/sec
Max. 600
300
310
**for
(cm)
23
600
payloads
A1.
600
Accuracy 5
(1000)
Returns
of 31 600
LiDAR
Integrated
Shots/sec
Max. 2
**for
600
300
(cm)
(kg)
23
0.95
payloads
1.59
Accuracy
Weight 5
(1000)
131 **
of3
LiDAR
Shots/sec 5 300
(cm)
for(kg)
Velodyne
23
Velodyne
0.95
payloads
Velodyne
1.59
Accuracy
Weight
(1000)5
Teledyne
of 31Ultra
0.95
CL-360 (cm)
for(kg)
VLP-32C
Velodyne
23
Velodyne
0.95
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.59
Accuracy
Weight
Optech 5
Teledyne
of 31Ultra
Velodyne
Puck
UAS.
Velodyne
CL-360 (kg)
VLP-32C
Velodyne
VLP-32C
Velodyne
Puck
Ultra
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.59
Weight
CL-360
Optech
Teledyne
VLP-32C
Ultra
Puck
CL-360 Puck
VLP-16
Velodyne
Optech *
VLP-16 * *
3DBrand
TargetAppendix
Appendix A 3D True
Target
Geo-MMS
3D VLP-32C
View
Scanfly
3D
Appendix
A
Target
Hovermap 410
True
Target
LITE
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
VF1 VLP-32C
3DIS
View
Scanfly
True
M8 VLP-32C
410
True
LITE
View
Appendix
A LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Scanfly
Hovermap VF1 VLP-32C
100
3DIS
200
View
Scanfly
410A
150
M8
LITE
Hovermap
100 410
LITE
3DIS
LiDAR (V)40,
100
3DIS
200
(V)30,
(V)20,
VF1 150
M8
100 (H)360
100
200
(H)360(V)40,
100
200
(V)20,
150 (H)360
(V)40,
(V)30, 2
(H)360
(V)30,
100 3 2 (V)40,
(H)360
(V)30,
(V)20, (H)360
2
(H)360
3 2 700
300
430
300 2 32 2 700
300
430
300 3 6
700
300 5 700
300
430
300 3 6
1.6
1.8 52 6 5 Velodyne
3
Velodyne6
Quanergy
Velodyne
1.6
1.8 52 2
1.6 VLP-32E
Velodyne
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
Puck
Velodyne
1.6
M8-Core
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.8 2 Teledyne
Lite Puck
Quanergy
Velodyne
Lite Optech
VLP-32E
Velodyne
M8-Ultra
VelodyneQuanergy
VLP-32E
Velodyne
Lite
M8-Ultra
M8-Core
VLP-16Puck
Velodyne Lite VLP-32E
M8-Ultra
Puck Lite
M8-Core
Lite
VLP-16 Lite *
Brand
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMSModel
Brand
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
VLP-32E Geo-MMS
LiDAR Model
CL-360
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS Brand
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Hovermap
VLP-32E LiDAR
LiDARCL-360
775
Geo-MMS
LiDAR M8
Model
LiDAR
VF1
VLP-32E LiDAR
CL-360 FOV
CL-360
775 150
Model
360(deg)
100
775 FOV(V)20,
775 (deg)
360 4 360
360 (H)360
FOV 360(deg) 4 310 4 3 FOV
2 (deg)4 310 430
300
310 1 310 1 3
1 Quanergy LiDAR
1 1.8 Sensor
LiDAR Velodyne GNSS
SensorM8-Core
LiDAR
IMU
VLP-16 StorageCamera
GNSS
Sensor
Lite LiDAR
IMU *
StorageCamera
GNSS
Sensor IMU *
StorageCamera
GNSS *IMU *
StorageCamera
Group
Geodetics
Drones 2020, 4, xLS
DronesGroup
FORNano
GeodeticsScanfly
2020,
PEERM8
Group
LS4,
Drones
Geodetics
Geo-MMS
Group
HD2
Geodetics
Nano
xREVIEW
Hovermap FOR M8 LSGeo-MMS
Scanfly
2020,
PEER
HF1 4, VLP-32E
Nano
Drones HD2
200
xREVIEW
Hovermap
LiDAR
Geo-MMS LSFOR M8
2020,
Hovermap PEER
HF1
LiDAR
Scanfly
120
(m)
LS200
Nano
4,HF1
Hovermap
LiDAR 100
Geo-MMS
Nano M8 HD2
M8
xREVIEW
FOR (V)40,
Scanfly
PEER120
360
(m)
200
(V)40,
HF1
LiDAR 100
Geo-MMS (H)360
360 HD2
REVIEW
(H)360
200
200
100
(V)40,
Table 120
A1.
(m)
200
(V)40,
LiDAR 100 (H)360
322360
Integrated
Table
Returns
360
(H)360
(V)40, 360
(V)40,
120
3 (V)40,
A1.
(m)
(H)360
(H)360
322400
LiDAR
Integrated
Table
Returns
360
(H)360 300
(V)40,
**
400
600
300
3 2
(H)360
322 2400
payloads
A1. LiDAR
Integrated
Table
Returns 300
**for
600
300 235UAS.
payloads
A1.
(cm)
23
400
600
300 LiDAR
of 31 21.95
Integrated
Returns 300
**for
400
600
300 1.95
235UAS.
payloads
(cm)
(kg)
1.95
23
1.8 LiDAR
of2 3 31 300
Velodyne
**for1.95
235UAS.
payloads
(cm)
(kg)
Quanergy
1.95
23
Velodyne
Velodyne
1.8
Teledyne Puck
CL-360
of
1.95
1.8
Velodyne
M8-Core
for1.95
(cm)
(kg)
M8-Core
Quanergy
31VLP-161.95
23
VLP-32C
Velodyne
Velodyne
1.8
Optech 532MR
Teledyne UAS.
of
LitePuck
Quanergy Velodyne
1.95
32MR
(kg)
M8-Core
CL-360Quanergy
31VLP-16
VLP-32C
Velodyne
Velodyne
Velodyne
Velodyne
Teledyne Lite
M8-Core
CL-360
Optech
Teledyne
VLP-32C
VLP-16
Optech
Puck
Velodyne
32MR
M8-Core
CL-360
VLP-32C
VLP-16
Optech
Lite LitePuck * 32MR * * *
Appendix
GeoCue Appendix
Emesent A Emesent
Geo-MMS
GeoCue Appendix
GeoCueA
Scanfly
Geo-MMS
Emesent
Geo-MMS LiDAR
Geo-MMS
GeoCue
VLP-32C
ULTRA
Emesent
LiDAR Appendix
A
VLP-16
Scanfly
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS LiDAR
VLP-32C
CL-360 Max.
Geo-MMS
ULTRA
Scanfly
Geo-MMS
M8 LiDAR A
Scanfly
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
VLP-32C
LiDAR
ULTRA
Geo-MMS Range
VLP-16
LiDAR
150
M8 LiDAR
VLP-32C
CL-360
775
100 Max.
VLP-16
ULTRA
LiDAR
CL-360
LiDAR Range
VLP-16
(V)20,
150
M8360
CL-360
775
(V)40,
100 100
775 Max.
(H)360
(H)360 Range
775
(V)40,
100 Max.
360
(H)360
(V)40,
(V)20,
150 2
(H)360
3 4 Max.
360
360 Range
Shots/sec
(V)40,
100
(H)360
(V)20, Max.
360
(H)360
2
(H)360
3 4 300
310
700
(V)40,
600
430 4 2 (1000)
Shots/sec
Max.
(H)360
324 Accuracy
300
310
700
600
430 (1000)
300
310 6
600
3 15 Shots/sec
Max. 2 Accuracy
300
310
700
600
430 Weight
(1000)
1.59
3 6
0.9515 Shots/sec
1 5 Accuracy
700 Weight
(1000)
Velodyne
1.591
Velodyne
Velodyne6
0.95
RIEGL
Quanergy
3 5 1.59 Accuracy
Weight
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.59
VLP-32E
Velodyne
Ultra
0.95Sensor 6
Velodyne
0.95
M8-Core
Quanergy Puck
Velodyne Weight
VLP-16
Velodyne Velodyne
VLP-16
VLP-32E
Velodyne
Ultra
Velodyne
Puck
Ultra
M8-Core
Quanergy VLP-16
VLP-32E
Puck Velodyne
Ultra Puck
M8-Core VLP-32E
* * * *
Brand
3D Target LS
LiDAR SWISS Brand
True
3DNano LS
Target Model
View
NanoBrand
VLP-32E
Scanfly 410
True
M8
3D Target
LITE
HD2 Geo-MMS
3DIS
LS Model
View Brand
Nano
VLP-32E
True
Scanfly
3D
LS 410
True
ViewM8LiDAR
3DIS
Target
LITE
Nano
HD2 LS200
View
NanoM8
Model
VLP-32E
410
Scanfly
100
M8
120 410
3DIS M8
LITE
HD2 FOV
(V)20,
3DIS
200 150
Model
(deg)
(H)360
360
VLP-32E
(V)30,
Scanfly
100
(V)40,
120 200 LITE
(H)360
HD2 FOV(V)20,
(V)20,
200 (deg)
(H)360
360
(V)20,
(V)30,
100
(V)40,
120 3
2360
(H)360 (H)360
FOV
(V)20,
(V)30,
100
(V)40,
120 (deg)
(H)360
360 3
2100
(H)360 430
400
(V)30,
600
32
300
(V)40,3 FOV (deg)
3 payloads 3
2 5400
(H)360 430
600
300 430
3
253UAS.
430
400 430
400
600
22.95
300 3
1.95
253UAS.
1.6 2 3
233 300 LiDAR
Quanergy
3
1.95
253UAS.
Velodyne
1.6 2 RIEGL
CL-360
2VLP-16
1.95 PuckLiDAR
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
M8-Core
1.95
Velodyne
1.6
VLP-32C
Puck 2Quanergy
GNSS
Sensor
RIEGL
Quanergy
Lite
Quanergy
5Velodyne
32MR M8-Core
LiDAR
M8-Core
CL-360
Puck IMU
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
Velodyne
1.6
VLP-32C
RIEGL
CL-360
Puck StorageCamera
GNSS
RIEGL
M8-Ultra
Lite
M8-Core
1.95
32MR Sensor
LiDAR
IMU
M8-Ultra
M8-Core
CL-360
Puck
Velodyne
Puck Lite
VLP-32C
Velodyne
32MR StorageCamera
GNSS
Sensor
Puck
LitePuck IMU
Lite StorageCamera
GNSS IMU StorageCamera
Geodetics
Group
Appendix Appendix Hovermap
AxGeodetics
Group LS
Vux
Appendix
GroupA
Geo-MMSNano
VLP-32C
VF1
Geodetics
Group Hovermap
LiDAR
VuxLS
330
Hovermap
Appendix
A
Geo-MMSNano
VLP-32C
Geo-MMS
LS
VF1
Hovermap
Geodetics
Max.
LiDAR
Nano (m)
Geo-MMS
Vux
VLP-32CLS AVF1
Range
330
Nano
VLP-32C
LiDAR
Vux
VF1
Max.
LiDAR
Vux
360
(m) 200
100
Range
330360
330 Max.(m)
Table (V)40,
Returns
A1. Integrated
Range
330 Table
Max.
360
5(H)360
360
Max.
5360 (m)Returns
A1. LiDAR
RangeIntegrated
Table
Shots/sec
Max.
360 **
5 100 52FOV A1.Returns
LiDAR
Integrated
(1000)Table
Shots/sec
Max. **for 600
300
(cm)
payloads
A1.
Accuracy
5 100 (1000)
100 Returns
LiDAR
Integrated
5Shots/sec
Max. **for 1.8
(cm)
(kg)
payloads
Accuracy
100 Weight
(1000)
2.95 LiDAR
5Shots/sec
55331of
Velodyne
**for 1.8
(cm)
(kg)
payloads
Accuracy
Weight
(1000)
Teledyne
2.95
miniVUX-1UAV 5 of 1.8
2.95
Velodyne
1.8
(cm)
for(kg)
Accuracy
Weight
Optech
Teledyne
2.95
Lite
UAS. VLP-16
Velodyne
Velodyne (kg)
Weight
Optech
Teledyne
Lite
VLP-32C
VLP-16
Teledyne
Optech
VLP-16
Lite
Optech * 32MR * * *
Drones
LiDAR 2020, 4,
Brand
SWISSDrones
LiDARFOR Hovermap
2020,
PEER
Geo-MMS
Drones
Brand
Geo-MMS 4,
Drones
2020,
Geo-MMS
SWISS
LS xREVIEW
FOR
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
4,
Model
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
LiDAR
Nano HF1
Hovermap
2020,
PEER
xLiDAR
BrandFOR 4, xREVIEW
VLP-16
CL-360
Geo-MMS
SWISS
Geo-MMS
M8 LS FOR
LiDAR
PEER
LiDAR HF1
Hovermap
PEER
Geo-MMS
Hovermap
Model REVIEW
Brand
Geo-MMS
Nano LiDAR 100
VLP-16
HF1
CL-360
775
100
Geo-MMS
LiDAR
M8 LS200 REVIEW
LiDAR
VLP-16
Model
LiDAR
Nano HF1
LiDAR 100360
VLP-16
FOV
CL-360
775
(V)40,
100
Geo-MMS
CL-360
M8 200 100
Model
(deg)
(H)360
775
100
360 LiDAR 100
FOV
775
(V)40,
100360 32422360
(deg)
(H)360
(V)40,
200360 360
360 FOV 360
(V)40,
(H)360360 32422 400
(deg)
(H)360 300
310
700 32422 400
(deg)
24 payloads 300
310
700 261553UAS.
23
300
310
700 of 31 700 300
310
400 1.8
261553UAS.
23
1.59
1.95 of23
61 600 Velodyne
31 1.8
261553UAS.
23
Velodyne
1.59
LiDAR
Velodyne
miniVUX-1UAV
Quanergy
1.95 31VLP-16
1.8
1.59
RIEGLVelodyne
1.8
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.59
Sensor
LiDAR
VLP-32E
Velodyne
miniVUX-1UAV
M8-Core
Quanergy
1.95 Lite
VelodyneVLP-16
Velodyne
VLP-16
Velodyne
GNSS
Sensor
Velodyne LiDAR
VLP-32E Lite
Velodyne
VLP-16
VLP-16
IMU
Velodyne
VLP-32E
miniVUX-1UAV
RIEGLM8-Core
Quanergy VLP-16
VLP-16
Lite Lite StorageCamera
StorageCamera
GNSS
miniVUX-1UAV
RIEGLSensor
LiDAR
IMU
VLP-32E
M8-Core GNSS
SensorIMUStorageCamera GNSSIMUStorageCamera
GeoCue
Emesent
3D Target 3D LiDAR
GeoCue
Geo-MMS SWISS
GeoCue
Emesent
Scanfly
Emesent
Target
ScanflyGeoCue
Emesent
3DULTRA
VLP-32E
LiDAR Scanfly
Target
LITE
Geo-MMS LS
Scanfly
3D Nano
ULTRA
VLP-32E
M8 Target
LITE
LiDAR
Geo-MMS M8
Scanfly
(m)
Scanfly
100 ULTRA
VLP-32E
150
M8
200 LITE
LiDARScanfly
(V)40,
(m)
(V)30,
(V)20,
150
M8
(V)40,
200 200
Scanfly
100 (H)360
ULTRA(V)40,
LITE
Table
(H)360 (m)
(V)30,
100
A1.
(V)20,
150
(V)40,
200 (H)360
Returns
Integrated
Table
3
(H)360
2 (V)40,
(m)
A1.
(V)20,
(V)40,
200 (H)360
Returns
(V)30,
100 LiDAR
Integrated
Table
3
(H)360
2 3
600
(V)40,
**
300
(V)30,
430
600
(V)40, A1. (H)360
Returns
LiDAR
Integrated
Table
3
(H)360
2 600
**
300
430
600 400
(cm)
for
payloads
A1.
3 Returns
LiDAR 2
Integrated
2 600
**
300
430
600for0.95
(cm)
(kg)
1.6
payloads
3 2
LiDAR Velodyne
**
300
600 0.95
(cm)
(kg)
Velodyne
for 1.6
payloads
Quanergy
3 1.95 Ultra
CL-360Velodyne
Puck0.95
(cm)
(kg)
Velodyne
for 1.6
M8-Core
Quanergy
VLP-32C
3 5 Quanergy
Puck
Lite
UAS. RIEGL
Ultra
Puck
CL-360 M8-Core
Velodyne
0.95
Puck
(kg)
Velodyne
1.6
Lite
M8-Core
Quanergy
VLP-32C Ultra
Velodyne
Puck
CL-360 Puck
Velodyne
Lite
M8-Core
VLP-32C Ultra
Puck
*
VLP-32C Puck
Lite * * **
Surveyor
True LS Nano
View HD2
VuxLS Nano
Geo-MMS
LS HD2
100
VLP-32E
NanoVuxLS 120
330
LiDAR
VuxNanoM8HD2
Vux 120
360
330360
150
330 HD2 120
330360
(V)20, 352360 120360
2(H)360 352300 100 533 (1000) 352 5430100 353Shots/sec
430
100 312.3 100 1.95
353Shots/sec
2.95 2 533331Velodyne Velodyne
1.95
3532 of
Teledyne
2.95 2.95 Puck
Velodyne
VLP-16 1.95
Optech
2.95 532MR
Teledyne Puck
QuanergyVelodyne
Teledyne 1.95
CL-36032MR
Optech
Teledyne
M8-Core
Optech Puck
Velodyne
32MR
OptechLitePuck * 32MR *
Appendix
Geodetics
Drones
LiDAR SWISS
Group Appendix
AxGeodetics
2020, 4,
Drones
LiDARFOR 2020,
PEERAppendix
A
4,
Drones
Geo-MMS
Geodetics
Drones
Geo-MMS
Group 2020, 4,
VLP-32C x410
LiDAR
Surveyor
SWISSLiDAR
True
Geodetics
xREVIEW
Hovermap FOR
GroupFOR
Geo-MMS
3DIS
2020,
PEER
VF1
LiDAR View
True
4,
Geo-MMS
PEER
Surveyor
SWISS
Geo-MMS
410
True
View
Appendix
A xREVIEW
HovermapFOR 3DIS
PEER
VF1
REVIEW
Hovermap
Geo-MMS
VLP-32C
CL-360
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
LiDAR
Surveyor
200
View
410A
Hovermap
LiDAR 100
Geo-MMS
Max. VF1
LiDAR
VLP-32C
CL-360
775
100
410
3DIS
REVIEW
Range
LiDAR
Surveyor
CL-360
(V)20,
3DIS
VF1
LiDAR
Max. 200
100
100
(H)360
200
360
Range
100
VLP-32C
CL-360
775360
775
100
(V)20,
Max. 200
100
775
100
(H)360
(V)20,
360
Range
Max.
360 42360 Max.
360
360
(V)20,
(H)360 (H)360
360
Range
Shots/sec
Max.
360 42 700
430
300
310
300 2242FOV Shots/sec
Max. 42 700 300 430
23
Accuracy
310
300 15 of
(1000)
300
310
300 Max. 430
300 23
1.8
Accuracy
310
300 Weight15 of23
(1000)
2.3
Quanergy
561 ofAccuracy
31 23
Velodyne
1.8
Weight
(1000)
15 2.3
Velodyne
2.3
miniVUX-1UAV 31
1.8
RIEGL
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
2VLP-16
Velodyne
1.8
Accuracy
Weight
VLP-16
Velodyne
2.3
2Quanergy
Lite
Velodyne
miniVUX-1UAV
Velodyne
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
VLP-16M8-Ultra
Velodyne
Weight Lite
VLP-16
VLP-16
Velodyne
M8-Ultra
VLP-16
Lite
miniVUX-1UAV
miniVUX-1UAV
RIEGL VLP-16
RIEGL VLP-16 *
Brand LiDAR
Brand LSSWISS
Group
Geo-MMSModel
Nano
Hovermap Brand
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
M8 LS
HF1 Model
Brand
Nano
Hovermap
Geo-MMS LiDAR
Geo-MMS
M8
HF1LS Model
100
200
Nano
Hovermap
LiDAR LiDAR
M8HF1FOVModel
(V)40,
100
200360
Hovermap (deg)
(H)360
100 HF1FOV
(V)40,
Table 100
200 (deg)
(H)360
(V)40,
A1.
360 3 2
Integrated
Table FOV
(V)40,
(H)360
A1.
100360(deg)
(H)360
LiDAR
3 2
Integrated
Table 400 (deg)
payloads
A1. LiDAR2
Integrated
360Table
3 400for 6
700
payloads
A1.
2 3UAS.
LiDAR
Integrated700
400for 6
payloads
1.95
2
1.8 3UAS.
LiDAR forLiDAR
Velodyne
6
payloads
Quanergy
1.95
2
Velodyne
1.8 3UAS.
CL-360Sensor
forLiDAR
VLP-32E
Velodyne
M8-Core
Quanergy
1.95
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.8 3 UAS.
Lite RIEGL
GNSS
Sensor
LiDAR
VLP-32E
Velodyne
M8-Core
CL-360 IMU
Velodyne
VLP-32E
Quanergy
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.8 Lite StorageCamera
GNSS
Sensor
LiDAR
IMU
VLP-32E
M8-Core
CL-360
VLP-16
Velodyne
Lite StorageCamera
GNSS
Sensor
VLP-16 IMU
Lite StorageCamera
GNSS IMU StorageCamera
3D Target
GeoCue Geo-MMS
Surveyor
3D
GeoCue LS
Scanfly
Target LiDAR
Scanfly
Ultra
ScanflyGeo-MMS
Nano
3D HD2
ULTRA
VLP-32E Vux
Target
LITE
GeoCue VLP-16
LS
Geo-MMSLS
Scanfly LiDAR
Scanfly
ScanflyGeo-MMS
LS
Nano
3D HD2
200
Nano
NanoVux
ULTRA
VLP-32ETarget
LITE VLP-16
LS
LiDAR 100
Scanfly
120
M8
330
Vux
Scanfly
Scanfly
100
(m) LiDAR
Nano HD2
Vux
VLP-16
ULTRA
VLP-32ELITE VLP-16
100
(V)40,
Scanfly
120
360
330
Scanfly
(V)40,
(V)30, (H)360
200
100
330
Scanfly
100
(m) HD2
(H)360
ULTRA 100
(V)40,
120
330
(V)40,
LITE
(V)30,
100
(m) (H)360
(H)360
Returns 2 5
2360 2
360 (V)40,
120
(V)40,
(V)30,
100
(m) (H)360
(H)360
Returns 2 5 300
600
2 600 (V)40,
100
600 3
52 (1000)
(V)40,
300
(V)30,
** (H)360
(H)360
Returns 2 5 5
2 600300
100
600
300 400
300
100
** (cm) 5
5 Returns 2 300
2.7
100
2 600
600
300 1.59
2.95
0.95
1.6
**Weight
(cm)
(kg) 5
5 535 600 2 300 Velodyne
Velodyne1.59
2.95
Velodyne
300
** 0.95
Velodyne
1.6
(cm)
(kg) 5
5 2.95 VLP-16
VLP-32
1.95 Velodyne
Puck
1.59Ultra1.59
2.95
Velodyne
Puck0.95
Velodyne
1.6
(cm)
(kg) 5 32MR
5PuckQuanergy
Lite VLP-16
PuckVelodyne
1.95
CL-360
Velodyne
Ultra
Puck 32MR
M8-Core
VLP-16
Velodyne
0.95
Puck VLP-16
Puck
Lite Ultra
Velodyne
1.6
(kg) 32MR
Velodyne
Puck Puck Puck
Lite Ultra
Velodyne ** Puck
Puck 32MR
Lite ** ** **
Emesent
LiDAR SWISS
Geodetics
Drones 2020, LiDAR
4, GeoCue
EmesentSurveyor
SWISS
Geo-MMS
xGeodetics
Drones
FOR 2020,
PEER Emesent
Surveyor
LiDAR
4, Ultra
LiDAR
Geodetics
Drones
xREVIEW
FOR Surveyor
SWISS
Geo-MMS
2020,
PEER M8
4, Max.
VLP-32E
Emesent
Surveyor Ultra
xREVIEW
FOR 200
Range
100
Surveyor
Surveyor
Surveyor
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
PEER 200
150
M8 (V)40,
Max.
Ultra
LiDAR
REVIEW 200
100
200
(V)20,
150
M8 (H)360
Range
200
360
100
(H)360(V)40,
Max. 200
200
(V)20,
150 (H)360
Range
(V)40,
100360 322360
Max.
(H)360 Max.(V)40,
(H)360
(V)20, (H)360
Range
360 322 430
Shots/sec
Max.
(H)360 300
600 232 322 430
Shots/sec
Max. 300
600 33315Shots/sec
Accuracy
(1000)
600
300
23 Max.
of 31 300
600
430 33315Shots/sec
Accuracy
(1000)
2.3
2.7
23 53331of310 333152 of2.3
Accuracy
Weight
(1000)
Teledyne
Velodyne
2.3
miniVUX-1UAV
2.7
Quanergy VLP-32C
31 Accuracy
Weight
Optech
Teledyne
VLP-16
Velodyne
2.3
VLP-32
2.7
M8-Core
Quanergy VLP-32C
Velodyne
miniVUX-1UAV
Velodyne Weight
Optech
Teledyne
VLP-32C
VLP-16
Velodyne
miniVUX-1UAV
VLP-32
VLP-16
miniVUX-1UAV
M8-Core
Quanergy VLP-32C
Optech
Teledyne
VLP-16
VLP-32
M8-Core Optech
Brand
Appendix LiDAR
Drones
True
Brand
Geo-MMS LSSWISS
Geodetics
2020,
View 4,
VLP-32C
Model x410
Brand
LiDAR FOR
True
Geo-MMS
Nano M8 Surveyor
Geo-MMS
PEER
3DIS
View
VLP-32C
Model
CL-360
True
LS REVIEW
410
True
Brand
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
View
VLP-32C
Nano M8 Ultra
LiDAR
3DIS
200
View
CL-360
775
410
LS200 M8
VLP-32C
Model410
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
3DIS
Nano M8 (V)20,
3DIS
200
FOV
CL-360
775
200 200
150
(H)360
Model
(deg)
LiDAR
200
360 (V)20,
(V)20,
200
FOV
CL-360
775 (H)360
33422360
(deg)
(V)20,
200360 (H)360
(V)20,
FOV
775
(H)360 (H)360
360 33422 400
(deg) 430
310 33FOV 360 33422 400
(deg) 430
310 600
430
430
23UAS. 430
42 400
310 1.95
23UAS. 2 of23 31 23
Quanergy
LiDAR
Quanergy
1.95
23UAS. 2.7 M8-Ultra
Quanergy
Sensor
2VLP-16
RIEGL LiDAR
M8-Core
Quanergy
1.95 Quanergy
132Quanergy GNSS VLP-32
Sensor
RIEGL M8-Core
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
LiDAR
IMU
M8-Ultra
M8-Core
Quanergy M8-Ultra
StorageCamera
GNSS
RIEGLSensor
LiDAR
IMU
M8-Core StorageCamera
GNSS
SensorIMU StorageCamera
GNSSIMUStorageCamera
3D TargetAppendix
Group ARevolution
Appendix
3DGroup Appendix
Group
LS
A
Geo-MMS
Hovermap
Geo-MMS
Target
Scanfly
Hovermap
Scanfly 3D
60
NanoA LiDAR
Group
HD2
ULTRA
VF1
LiDAR
Target
LITE
HF1
VuxLS
A
Geo-MMS
Hovermap
HovermapLS
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
Scanfly
3D
Geo-MMS
Nano
Scanfly 100
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
VF1
Hovermap
Nano
LiDAR
HF1
Max.
HD2
Vux
ULTRA LS
100
M8
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Target
LITE Scanfly
100
(m)
Hovermap
LiDAR
Range
120
330
Nano
100
Scanfly
LiDAR
VF1
Hovermap
LiDAR
LITEHF1
Max.
HD2
Vux
ULTRA
100
(V)30,
Scanfly
100
(m)
Hovermap 200
Range
120
360
330
(V)40,
100
Scanfly360
VF1
(H)360
LITE
HF1
Max.
HD2
(H)360
100
(V)30,
Table 100
A1.
(m) (H)360
Integrated
Range
120
330
(V)40,
ULTRA200100 Table
Returns
Max.
360
(H)360
2 5 Max.
2
100
(V)30,
100
A1.
(m) (H)360
LiDAR
RangeIntegrated
Table
Returns
Shots/sec
120 Max.
360
(V)40, (H)360
2 5
300
(V)30,
**
300
300(V)40,
100
700
600
360
payloads
A1. LiDAR
Integrated
360
(1000)Table
Returns
Shots/sec
Max.
(H)360
2 5
300
**for 400
payloads
A1.
(cm)
Accuracy
300
4.6
100
700
600300(1000)
6 53 LiDAR
Integrated
Returns
Shots/sec
Max. 2
300
**
1.53
100
700for 1.8
1.6
payloads
(cm)
(kg)
1.8
Accuracy
300 Weight
(1000)
1.95
2.95
600 4.6 6
0.95 53 LiDAR2 300
Shots/sec
300
Velodyne
** 1.8
Velodyne
for 1.6
payloads
(cm)
(kg)
Velodyne
Velodyne1.8
Accuracy
Weight
(1000)
1.95
2.95
Velodyne
6 53 1.95 Velodyne
Puck
VLP-16
CL-360 1.8
Velodyne
for 1.6
(cm)
(kg)
Velodyne
PUCK 1.8
Accuracy
Weight
Puck 1.95
2.95
VLP-32E 5
Velodyne 3 Lite
Lite
UAS.
Lite
32MR
VLP-16
Velodyne
Quanergy
Puck
VLP-161.8
RIEGL
Velodyne
CL-360
Puck 1.8
Weight
1.95
Lite
M8-Core
Velodyne
1.6
Lite
(kg) Lite
32MR
VLP-32E
Velodyne
VLP-16
Velodyne
Puck
VLP-16 Lite
Velodyne
Lite
Velodyne
CL-360
Puck Lite
32MR
VLP-32E
VLP-16
Puck
VLP-16
CL-360
Puck *
Lite
Lite
Lite
32MR * * **
Brand
Emesent
LiDAR
AppendixSWISS
GeoCue LiDARGeo-MMS
Brand
Emesent
Appendix
AGeodetics
GeoCue
LiDAR
Surveyor
Surveyor
Revolution
SWISS LiDAR
Model Ultra
Geo-MMS
Brand
VLP-32E
LiDAR
Appendix
A GeoCue
SWISS Geo-MMS
EmesentSWISS
LS
Surveyor
Revolution
60 Nano
Surveyor
Surveyor
VLP-16
LiDARUltra
Geo-MMS
Revolution
Model
VLP-32E
A LiDAR
Brand
Emesent
VLP-32E
GeoCue
Vux
Surveyor
Surveyor
Surveyor
Revolution
60
Ultra
VLP-16
100
60LiDAR
200 Ultra
VLP-16
Model
VLP-32E 60
VLP-16
100
(V)40,
200
FOV 330
100
100
200
360
(H)360 (V)40,
100
(deg)(V)40,
100
200
Model FOV 360 2360
(H)360
(V)40,
(deg) 360
360(H)360360
(V)40,
(H)360
FOV (H)360
2 600
(deg) 300 22 25FOV (deg) 2 600 300 100
700
4.6
600 35
300
600 300
600 2.3
2.7
1.53
1.59
35 4.6 56 355 600 Velodyne
0.95
Velodyne
2.3
2.7
Velodyne
4.6
1.53
Velodyne
1.59
35 1.53
Velodyne
Teledyne
LiDAR
miniVUX-1UAV
2.95Ultra
2.3
2.7
1.59
RIEGL
Velodyne
0.95
VLP-16
Velodyne
PUCK2.3
VLP-32
2.7
Velodyne
1.53
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.59
VLP-32C
Velodyne
Optech
Teledyne
Sensor
LiDAR
Puck Ultra
Velodyne
Velodyne
miniVUX-1UAV
Velodyne
0.95
VLP-16
VLP-16Puck
Velodyne
VLP-32
VLP-32E
VLP-16
PUCK
Velodyne
VLP-32
Velodyne
VLP-32C
VelodyneVelodyne
Optech
GNSS
Sensor
Teledyne PUCK
VLP-16
Teledyne
VLP-32C
LiDAR
IMU
Optech
Ultra
Velodyne
PUCKPuck Ultra
VLP-16
VLP-32
VLP-16
VLP-32C
Optech
StorageCamera
GNSS
miniVUX-1UAV
miniVUX-1UAV
RIEGLRIEGL RIEGLSensor
LiDAR * Puck
IMUStorageCamera
GNSS
Sensor *
IMUStorageCamera
GNSS *
IMUStorageCamera
GeodeticsM200 Appendix
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
LS Nano
Hovermap
Geodetics
Series
True Scanfly
LSSnoopy
Nano
Scanfly
View
A
VLP-32C
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Geodetics
M8
HD2
ULTRAVux
410
True LS VLP-32C
CL-360
M8
Geo-MMS LiDAR
Scanfly
LS
3DIS Geo-MMS
Nano
Scanfly
View
LS VLP-32C
LiDAR
Nano
Geo-MMS
VF1
Hovermap Geo-MMS
LiDAR
M8
HD2
150 Vux
ULTRA
410
True
Nano LSVLP-32C
CL-360
775
150
M8
(m)
200
LiDAR
VF1
Scanfly
LS 120
330
Scanfly
3DIS LiDAR
Nano
Hovermap
100
Nano
200
View
Vux LiDAR
CL-360
M8 M8
HD2
410
True CL-360
LS
VF1 775
(V)20,
150
M8
(m)
200
(V)40,
Scanfly
120
(V)40,
Vux
ULTRA 330
Scanfly
(V)20,
3DIS
200
View (H)360
775
Nano
360
Hovermap
100 150 M8
VF1
HD2
(H)360
(H)360
ULTRA
410
330 775
(V)20,
150
(m)
200
(V)40,
120
330
(V)20,
3DIS
200 (H)360
Returns
360 3
(V)20,
100 (H)360
34 2 5 360
2
360 (V)20,
(m)
200
(H)360
100
(V)40,
120
(V)20,
200 (H)360
Returns
360 3
(H)36034 2 5 310
430
**
400
300
440(V)40,
100
600
430
(V)20,345 Returns
360 3
(H)360
34 2 5 2310
430
**
400
300
100
600
430 3
(cm)
310
2
430
3
10015 Returns
3 32 310
430
**
400
300
1.7
100
600
430 3
(cm)
(kg)
1.95
2
1.8
2.95
0.95
3 15 2 3 15 **
400
300
Quanergy
600 3
(cm)
(kg)
2.95
Velodyne
430 0.95
Quanergy
3 1
Quanergy
1.95
2
Velodyne
1.8 5 2 2.95Puck
M8-Core (cm)
Ultra(kg)
M8-Core
Quanergy
1.95
VLP-162
Velodyne
1.8
2.95
Velodyne
0.95
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
3 5 Quanergy
Lite
32MR
2Puck Puck (kg)
M8-Core
Quanergy
1.95
VLP-16
Ultra M8-Core
Velodyne
1.8 Lite
32MR
Velodyne
0.95
Puck
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
2 M8-Core
Quanergy
VLP-16
Velodyne
Puck
Ultra Lite
32MR
Velodyne
Puck
M8-Ultra
Quanergy M8-Core
VLP-16
Puck
Ultra
M8-Ultra Lite
32MR
Puck
LiDARUSA 3D Target 3D Surveyor
Target
Scanfly
Geo-MMS
M200 3D
Revolution
Hovermap
Series Ultra
Surveyor
Target
LITE Scanfly
LiDAR 3D
Revolution
60
HF1
Hovermap
Surveyor
Geo-MMS
M200
SnoopySeries Ultra
Surveyor
Target
LITE Scanfly
LiDAR
Max. 60 LITE
Revolution
60
HF1 100
Hovermap
Ultra
Geo-MMS
M200
Snoopy150
Series
Range Ultra
(V)30,
Scanfly
60
HF1 100360
Hovermap
LiDAR
Snoopy
(V)40,
Max. 150 200 LITE
(V)30,
HF1
(H)360
Range 100
(V)40,
Max. 150360
(H)360
Range
Max. 22360 Max.(V)30,
100360
(V)40, (H)360
Range
Shots/sec
Max. 22 440 (V)30,
300 (H)360
360
(1000) 22 440
Shots/sec
Max. 300 4.6
600
Accuracy253Shots/sec
(1000) Max. 2 440
300 2.7
1.6
4.6
1.53
1.8
253Shots/sec
1.7
Accuracy
Weight
(1000) 25UAS. 300 Velodyne
2.7
Velodyne
1.6
Velodyne
4.6
1.53
Velodyne
1.8
253UAS.
Quanergy
1.7 2.7 VLP-32
Velodyne
Puck
VLP-16
CL-360 2.7
Velodyne
PUCK1.6
Velodyne
1.53
Velodyne
1.8
M8-Core
Quanergy
1.7 Lite
3Quanergy
Lite VLP-32
Velodyne
Puck
Velodyne
VLP-161.6
PUCK Lite
Velodyne
Velodyne
Velodyne 1.8
M8-Core
CL-360 Lite
VLP-32
Quanergy VLP-32
Puck
Velodyne
PUCK
VLP-16 Lite
Velodyne
M8-Core
CL-360 Puck
LiteVLP-16*
* Lite Lite * * * **
Group
LiDAR SWISS
Brand
Emesent LiDAR LiDAR
Brand
Emesent Surveyor
Geo-MMS
GroupSWISSLiDAR
SWISS
Model LiDAR
Group
BrandGeo-MMS
EmesentSWISS Revolution
Geo-MMS
M200 Series
Surveyor
Geo-MMS
Model LiDAR
Brand
Emesent
LiDAR
Snoopy
100
Surveyor
Geo-MMS
Group
Surveyor LiDAR
100
Model LiDAR 100
(V)40,
100
FOV
100
150
360 Table
100
(H)360
Model
(deg)
100
(V)40,
100
(V)40,
100
FOV 360
A1. Integrated
Table
(H)360
2
(deg)
(V)40,
(H)360
360 Table360
A1.
(V)40,
FOV
(H)360 LiDAR
Integrated
Table
A1.
(H)360
2
(deg) 30022 payloads
Integrated
700 2 A1.
FOV LiDAR
Integrated
2
(deg) 300
LiDAR
700
300
440
for
payloads
300
6
700 UAS.
LiDAR
payloads 300
700for 2.3
payloads
6 for4.6
UAS. 6 5 Accuracy
Weight
(1000)
Velodyne
for 2.3
miniVUX-1UAV
Teledyne
Velodyne
6
LiDAR 2.3 Accuracy
1.53
1.7 Weight
VLP-16
Velodyne
2.3
miniVUX-1UAV
Optech
Teledyne
VLP-32E
Velodyne
Sensor
LiDAR
Velodyne
VelodyneWeight
VLP-16
miniVUX-1UAV
Optech
GNSS
Sensor
Teledyne
Velodyne
PUCK
M8-Core
CL-360
Velodyne
miniVUX-1UAV
VLP-16
Teledyne
VLP-32E
Velodyne
LiDAR
IMU
Optech
VLP-32E
VLP-16
Optech
VLP-32E
StorageCamera
GNSS
Sensor
LiDAR
IMU StorageCamera
GNSS
Sensor IMUStorageCamera
GNSSIMUStorageCamera
*
Appendix
GeoCue
LiDARUSA
3D Geo-MMS
Appendix
A GeoCue
Appendix
Snoopy
Target 3D Geo-MMS
LiDARUSA LiDAR
Scanfly
A-series
Target Geo-MMS
Appendix
A GeoCue
A
LiDARHD2
Geo-MMS
VLP-32E
LiDARUSA
Scanfly
3D Target
LITE VLP-16
A LiDAR
Scanfly
Geo-MMS
CL-360Geo-MMS
GeoCue
HD2
100
LiDAR
VLP-32E
Scanfly
3D LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Target
LITE VLP-16
100
200
Scanfly
120
CL-360
775 LiDAR
HD2
VLP-16
LiDAR
VLP-32E
(m)
Scanfly VLP-16
100
(V)40,
200
(V)40,
LITE 360
Scanfly
120
CL-360
775
(m)
(V)30,
Scanfly(H)360
100HD2
(H)360
200
360 LITE 100
(V)40,
200
120360
(H)360
(V)40,
775
(m)
(V)30,360 2
Returns 4 360
2 120
(H)360
(m)360
(V)40, (H)360
360
Returns
(V)30,
100 2 4 300
600
700(V)40,
310
**
(V)30,2 2
(H)360
Returns
(H)3604 6300
600
310
**for 3
300
600
(cm) 15 Returns
25653UAS. 2 300
600
2.51
310
**for1.59
(cm) 3
1.95
(kg)15 3 5 300 Velodyne
Velodyne
** 1.59
Velodyne
Velodyne
(cm) 3
1.95
(kg)15 RIEGL
1.59 VLP-16
VLP-32EVelodyne
1.59
VLP-32C
Velodyne
Puck
Velodyne
1.95
(cm)
(kg) 5 32MRRIEGLVLP-16
Velodyne
Velodyne Velodyne
VLP-32C
Velodyne
Puck
Velodyne
1.95
32MRRIEGL
VLP-16
VLP-32C
(kg) VLP-16
VLP-32C
Puck
VelodyneRIEGL
32MR Puck * 32MR * * **
Geodetics
Emesent
Group
M200
TrueRevolution
Hovermap
Geodetics
Geo-MMS Series
LSView
LiDARUSA
Snoopy
LS Nano
Nano
VLP-32C
Scanfly
Surveyor
Surveyor
Geodetics
Emesent
Group
410
True
ULTRA Revolution
60
HF1
Hovermap
Geo-MMS
M200
Snoopy
VF1
M8
A-series
Vux
Ultra
Geodetics
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Emesent
Group
Series
LSSnoopy
Snoopy
M200
LS VLP-32C
3DIS
View
Scanfly
Surveyor
Surveyor
M8 410
True
ULTRA Revolution
VLP-32E
Nano
VLP-32C60
HF1
Hovermap
LiDAR
M200
Snoopy
VF1
M8
Revolution
A-series
LSSeries
Nano Nano
Vux
Ultra
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Surveyor
Surveyor
Emesent
Group
LS150
200
Snoopy CL-360
Series
Nano
60
100
Snoopy
LS M8
330
Nano
VLP-32C
A-series
3DIS
View
Scanfly
100
200
150
M8
Ultra M8
410
Surveyor
Surveyor True
ULTRA 60
HF1
Hovermap
Snoopy
(V)40,
VF1
A-series
VuxLS 150
200
100
330
3DIS
Ultra
LiDAR
Geo-MMS View
Scanfly
(V)40,
100
200
(V)20,
150
M8 775
150
200
Nano
100
360 410HF1
(H)360
ULTRA
(H)360
LiDAR
100
200
(V)40,
VF1
Vux 150
200
100
3DIS
(V)40,
100
200
(V)20,
Table 150
M8 (H)360
(V)40,
330360
A1. 33225360
(H)360
Integrated
Table 360 (V)40,
(H)360
360 330
200
(V)40, (H)360
360
(V)20,
150
A1.
Table
33225 400
(H)360
LiDAR
Integrated
Table
A1.
300
440
700
100
600
(V)40,
300
430
(V)20,
Integrated A1.360
2342 payloads
360 33225 400
(H)360
LiDAR
Integrated 300
440
700
100
600
300
430
LiDAR
4.6
310
300
440
400
700
3
payloads
300
600 LiDAR3252 400
payloads
300
440
700
100
600
300
430 1.6
25653UAS.
4.6
1.53
1.8
1.7
1.95
2.51
2.95
0.95
2.3
2.7
3
payloads 2 4.6
for 215 430
26UAS. 300
100
600Velodyne
for 1.6
25653UAS.
Velodyne
4.6
1.53
Velodyne
1.8
Quanergy
1.7
1.95
Velodyne
2.51
2.95
Quanergy
Velodyne
0.95
Velodyne
2.3
2.7
3 1.53
1.7
1.95
2 2.51
miniVUX-1UAV
Puck
Velodyne
PUCK
VLP-16
2.7Ultra
2.3
CL-360
1.6
3553Quanergy
Velodyne
1.53
Velodyne
1.8
M8-Core
Quanergy
1.7
1.95
VLP-32E
Velodyne
2.51
2.95
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
Velodyne
0.95
VLP-16
Velodyne
2.3
VLP-32
2.7
M8-Core Lite
Lite Puck
Velodyne
Quanergy
2Velodyne
Puck
miniVUX-1UAV
Velodyne
1.6
PUCK Lite
Velodyne
Velodyne
1.8
M8-Core
Quanergy
VLP-16
VLP-32E
2.95 Lite
2PUCK
Velodyne
M8-Core
M8-Core
VLP-32E
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
Ultra
Velodyne
0.95
VLP-16
VLP-32Puck
Velodyne
M8-Core
Velodyne
CL-360
CL-360 VLP-16
VLP-32
miniVUX-1UAV
Puck
Velodyne
PUCK Lite
Velodyne
M8-Core
VLP-16
VLP-32E
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
Ultra
Velodyne
Puck
VLP-16
VLP-32
M8-Core
CL-360
Puck
LiteVLP-16** Puck
M8-Ultra
Ultra
M8-Core
miniVUX-1UAV
Lite
Lite ** ** *
LiDAR SWISS
LiDARUSA
3D Target LiDAR
LiDARUSA
3D SWISS
Target LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMSLiDARUSA
Scanfly
3D SWISS
LiDAR
LiDAR
Target
LITE LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
Scanfly
3D
Geo-MMS SWISS
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Max.
LiDAR
Target
LITE Range
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Scanfly
100
LiDAR LiDAR
Max.
LiDAR
LITE Range
Max.
(V)30,
Scanfly
100 Max.
Range
(H)360
LITE Range
(V)30,
100 Max.
(H)360 2 Shots/sec
(V)30,
100 Max.
(H)360 2 Max.
300
(V)30, (1000)
Shots/sec
Max.
Shots/sec
(H)360 2 Accuracy
300 (1000) 5Shots/sec
(1000) 2 Accuracy
300 Weight
(1000)
Accuracy
1.6 5 300 RIEGL
Accuracy
Weight
Velodyne
1.6 5Weight Weight
Puck
Velodyne
1.6 5 Lite Puck
Velodyne
1.6
Lite Puck
Velodyne
Lite Puck Lite
GeoCue
Brand Snoopy M200
GeoCue
LiDARUSA
Brand Series
Hovermap
Snoopy
miniVUX
Model
Scanfly M200
GeoCue
Brand
ULTRASnoopy
HD2VF1
A-series Series
Hovermap
Snoopy
M200
Snoopy
Scanfly M200
Snoopy
GeoCue
HD2VF1
A-series
330
Series
Model
ULTRA 150
Series
Hovermap
120
Snoopy
Snoopy
100
A-series
ScanflyModel Snoopy
HD2
ULTRA (V)40,
VF1
A-series 150
Hovermap
120
FOV 360
360
100
Scanfly
(V)40, 150 HD2
(H)360
100
(deg)
ULTRA(V)40,
VF1 150
120360
(V)40,
100
FOV
(V)40, (H)360
2360
(deg) (V)40,
120
5(H)360
FOV 360
(V)40, 2100
(H)360
(deg) 440
(V)40,
700
60022
(V)40, 360 2 5400
(H)360 440
600440
700 70026553 22.9440
700
600 4.61.7
26553 266 300
1.8
1.95
2.51
0.95 600Quanergy
1.7
26553 2.51
Velodyne
1.8
1.95
2.51
Teledyne
Velodyne
LiDAR
Velodyne
0.95 1.7 M8-Core
Quanergy
VLP-16
Puck
RIEGL 1.7
Velodyne
1.8
1.95
VLP-32E
2.51
Optech 5553332MR
Teledyne
Velodyne
Sensor
UltraLiDAR
Velodyne
0.95 Lite
Quanergy
Puck M8-Core
Quanergy
VLP-16
Velodyne
Puck
RIEGL 1.8
1.95
Optech Lite
32MR
VLP-32E
Teledyne
GNSS M8-Core
Velodyne
RIEGL
RIEGL
Velodyne
Teledyne VLP-32E
Sensor Optech
LiDAR
Ultra IMU
Velodyne
0.95
Puck M8-Core
VLP-16
Velodyne
Puck
RIEGL OptechLite
32MR
VLP-32E
StorageCamera
GNSS
Sensor
Ultra IMU
Velodyne
Puck VLP-16
Puck
StorageCamera
GNSS
Ultra Lite
32MR
IMU
Lite StorageCamera
Puck
Brand
True
Geo-MMSSurveyor
Revolution
Hovermap
Geo-MMS LSView
LS
Snoopy
Geo-MMS LiDAR
Nano
Nano
LiDAR
VLP-32E
Surveyor Ultra
Geo-MMS
LiDARM8
410
TrueSurveyor
HF1
Hovermap
Vux
miniVUX
Geo-MMS VLP-16
LS
3DIS
LS
Snoopy
Geo-MMS Nano
CL-360 Model
Revolution
60 LiDAR
Nano
LiDAR
VLP-32E
LS
Snoopy
M8
Geo-MMS
Ultra
SurveyorM8Surveyor
Revolution
Revolution
ViewLS Nano
410
True
Vux
miniVUX
Geo-MMS
Nano
Surveyor 60
HF1
Hovermap
Geo-MMS VLP-16
LS
LS
Snoopy100
200
Ultra
M8
3DIS
miniVUX
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
LiDAR
VLP-32E LiDAR
60
View
Nano
330
CL-360
775
VLP-32E
Vux
100
Surveyor
150
M8
(m)
Ultra
Geo-MMS
Nano M8
410
True
Vux60
(V)40,
HF1
Hovermap
miniVUX
LiDAR
LiDAR VLP-16
Geo-MMS
CL-360 100
200
3DIS
330
CL-360
775
100
(V)20,
150
M8
(m)
100
(H)360
LiDAR
360
View 100
200
360 410
330
Surveyor
330
(H)360
LiDAR
775
(V)40,
(V)40,
HF1 330
775
100
(V)20,
Table 150
M8
FOV
VLP-16
100
200
3DIS (H)360
360
360
A1.
(m) 332
(V)40,
(H)36045 2
Integrated
Table
Returns 360
360
(H)360
(deg)
(V)40,
100
(H)360
200
100 (H)360
360
360
(V)20,
150
A1. 332
(H)360
LiDAR 45 2
Integrated
Table
Returns 600
300
400
100
310
300
430
** 5 3
(V)20,245 360
360 332
(H)360
payloads
A1. LiDAR 45 2
Integrated
Returns 600
300
100
310
300
430
**
700
4.6
23
300
600
400
100
100
for 3 5
1
payloads
310
(cm) UAS.
LiDAR3 22 600
300
400
100
310
300
430
**for
2.7
1.53
23
1.8
1.59
1.95
2.95
2.9
2.3
3 5
1
payloads
(cm)
(kg) 2
UAS.4.6
5 2315 300
430
2.7
Velodyne
4.6
1.53
Velodyne
23
Velodyne
1.8
Velodyne
1.59
Quanergy
1.95
5 miniVUX-1UAV
2.95
2.95
1
Velodyne
2.3
Quanergy
for 3
(cm)
(kg) 2
UAS.1.53
1.95
2.95
2.9 VLP-32
PUCK2.7
Velodyne
1.53
VLP-32C
Velodyne
2.7VLP-16
Velodyne
1.8
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.59
M8-Core
Quanergy
1.95
M8-Ultra
2.95
2.9
VLP-16
Velodyne
2.3
M8-Core
Quanergy
3
(kg) 2 Velodyne
LiDAR
Lite VLP-32E
Sensor
VLP-32
PUCK
Velodyne
VLP-32C
Velodyne
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.8
VLP-16
Velodyne
QuanergyM8-Ultra
2
VLP-16 Lite
Velodyne
1.59
M8-Core
Quanergy
Velodyne
Velodyne VLP-32
PUCK
VLP-32C
M8-Core
Velodyne
2.3
M8-Core
Quanergy
GNSS
VLP-32
PUCK
VLP-32C
VLP-16
VLP-16LiteIMU
Velodyne
Velodyne
M8-Core
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
VLP-16
Velodyne
M8-Core VLP-16** StorageCamera
VLP-16
M8-Ultra
VLP-16
M8-Core ** ** **
VLP-32C VLP-32C Max.VLP-32C
RangeMax. Max. (m)
Range Max. Range
Range Max. Table A1.
Returns
Shots/sec
Max. Integrated (1000)
Shots/sec
Max. LiDAR **Shots/sec
Accuracy
(1000) payloads Accuracy
Weight
(1000) for UAS.
(cm) Accuracy Weight (kg) Weight
Emesent
Geodetics
3D
Group
LiDARUSA
LiDAR SWISS
GeoCue
Brand
Target
Emesent
Geodetics
3D
Group
LiDARUSA
LiDARGeoCue
BrandSWISS
LiDARUSA
LiDARSnoopy
Target
Scanfly
Geo-MMS
M200
Emesent
Geodetics
SWISS
3D
Group
LiDARUSA
Geodetics
LiDAR
GeoCue
Model
Scanfly
Brand Brand
ULTRA
Revolution
Hovermap
Series
SWISS
A-series
Snoopy
Target
LITE Scanfly
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
M200
Snoopy
VF1
Emesent
Snoopy
3D
VLP-32C
Group
GeoCue
A-series
Model
Scanfly ULTRA
Model
Revolution
60
HF1
Hovermap
Series Snoopy
Target
LITE 100
A-series
Scanfly
Scanfly
Revolution
60
HF1
LiDAR 100
Hovermap
Geo-MMS
M200
Snoopy
VF1 150 A-series
Model
ULTRA
SeriesLITE (V)40,
100
FOV
Scanfly
(V)30,
Scanfly
60
HF1 100 (H)360
100
360
Hovermap
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Snoopy
(V)40,
VF1 150 (deg)
ULTRA(V)40,
LITE 100
(V)30,
HF1
LiDAR
(H)360 100
(V)40,
VF1 150 (H)360
(V)40,
FOV (deg)
FOV
360
(H)360
2 2 (H)360(V)40,
FOV
(deg)
(V)30,
100 (H)360
360
(V)40, (deg)
(H)3602 2 Max.
700
600 2
(V)40,
(V)30,
300
440 360
Shots/sec
(H)360
2 2 440700
600
300 700
4.6
2 563 (1000) 2 2 700
600
300
440
Accuracy
2.51
0.95
1.6
4.6
1.53
1.8
1.7
2 563 6 600 300Velodyne
2.51
LiDAR
Velodyne
0.95
Velodyne
1.6 563Weight
miniVUX-1UAV
Velodyne
4.6
1.53
Velodyne
1.8
Quanergy
1.7
2
CL-360
RIEGL
2.51
RIEGL
miniVUX-1UAV
VLP-32E
Velodyne
Puck2.51
Sensor
UltraLiDAR
Velodyne
0.95
Velodyne
PUCK1.6 5
Velodyne
1.53
Velodyne
1.8
M8-Core
Quanergy
VLP-161.7 3 CL-360
Puck
LiDAR
Lite
Lite
miniVUX-1UAV
miniVUX-1UAV
miniVUX-1UAV
RIEGLVLP-32E
Velodyne
CL-360
RIEGL
Velodyne
GNSS
PuckSensor
Velodyne
1.6
PUCK CL-360
RIEGL
VLP-32E
Sensor
LiDAR
Ultra IMU
Velodyne
0.95
Puck
Lite
Velodyne
Velodyne
RIEGL 1.8
M8-Core
Quanergy
VLP-16 RIEGL
Lite VLP-32E
StorageCamera
GNSS
Sensor
Ultra IMU
Velodyne
Puck
GNSS
Puck
Velodyne
PUCK Lite
Velodyne
M8-Core
VLP-16 Lite StorageCamera
GNSS
Ultra
IMU
Puck
VLP-16 * IMU
Puck StorageCamera
StorageCamera
Lite
Lite * * *
True
Geo-MMS View
Geo-MMS
Snoopy
Surveyor
LiDAR410
True
LiDAR
Ultra
Geo-MMS M200
3DIS
Geo-MMS
miniVUX
Snoopy Revolution
View
Geo-MMS
Snoopy
Surveyor
VLP-16 Series
410
True
LiDAR 3DIS
LiDAR
Ultra
Geo-MMS 200
Geo-MMS
miniVUX
Snoopy33060
Snoopy
View
LiDAR
miniVUX
Surveyor
200
(m)
VLP-16
100 410
True
LiDAR (V)20,
LiDAR
miniVUX3DIS
Ultra
Geo-MMS 200
View
330
(m) 100
150
360
Surveyor
200
VLP-16
100 330410
LiDAR
360 Ultra (V)40,
(V)20,
3DIS
200
330
200
(m)360
Returns
VLP-16
100360 3525360360(H)360
(V)20,
200Returns
200
100360
360 3525300430
(V)20,
100
600
**
300 2
525 Returns (H)360
360 35255.5 430
100
600 300
440
100
** (cm)
300 355 3 430100
600 2.9
2.7
** (cm)
(kg) 4.6
3552 52 Velodyne 430
600 3552 (kg)
2.9
2.7
(cm)
(kg) 1.53
1.7
2.9 32Quanergy
M8-Ultra
2.9
VLP-32
2.7
(kg) Velodyne
RIEGL
VLP-32
2.7PUCK
M8-Core
M8-Ultra
2 M8-Ultra
Quanergy
VLP-32 M8-Ultra
VLP-32
Emesent
Group SCOUT-16
Emesent
Geo-MMS
Scanfly
LS
Geo-MMS
Group LS Nano
Nano
SCOUT-16
LiDAR
HD2
LiDAR
Surveyor Vux
Emesent
M8
Geo-MMS
VLP-32E
Scanfly
LS
Geo-MMS
Group LS Nano
M8Nano
SCOUT-16
LS
HD2
100
Scanfly
LS Vux
Emesent
Nano
LiDAR
M8 Scanfly
LS
HD2
Geo-MMS
Group
Surveyor
Surveyor
Max.
Nano
SCOUT-16
CL-360
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
VLP-32E LS120
100
330
VuxNano
150
M8
100
Surveyor
200
Nano
Range
SCOUT-16
M8
CL-360
775
HD2
LiDAR
VLP-32E
Vux
LiDAR
M8 (V)40,
Geo-MMS
Max. 120
(V)30,
100
330
(V)20,
150
M8
100
(V)40,
200
(V)30,
Max.
CL-360
775
(m)
(H)360
(H)360
360
120
330
LiDAR
(H)360
360
100
Range
200
(V)40,
Max.
Range
100
360
VLP-32E
120
100
330
(V)20,
150
M8
100
(V)40,
200
(V)30, (H)360
360
(V)40, 2
(H)360
360
Range 32
Max.
(V)40,
(V)30,
775360 4 360
360
(V)40,
2(H)360
100360
(V)20,
150
(V)40,
(V)30,
(H)360
(H)360
Returns
(H)360
2
(H)360
360
360 32
Shots/sec
Max. 4
700
(V)40,
100
430
(V)20,
300
600
400
Max.
310
(H)360
23224 (1000) 322
(H)360
Shots/sec
Max.
Shots/sec
4
700
100
430
300
600
400
310
**
26153Shots/sec
300
100
3
300
Accuracy
(1000)
5.5
600
400
300 3221.65
(1000)
300
700
100
430
300
600
400
1.59
26153 (cm)
1.95
2.95
3
2.3
1.95
Accuracy
310 Weight
(1000)
5.5
1.65
Accuracy 5.55235 430 300
700 Velodyne
1.59
Teledyne
Velodyne
1.95
Velodyne
26153Weight
2.95
3
2.3
Velodyne
miniVUX-1UAV
Quanergy
1.95
Accuracy
Weight
Velodyne
5.5
1.65
miniVUX-1UAV
1.95
2.95
2.3
RIEGL
1.95
1.65
VLP-16
Velodyne
Optech
Puck
VLP-16 1.59
36532MR
Teledyne
Velodyne
1.95
VLP-32E
Velodyne
2.95
Velodyne
VLP-16
2.3
VLP-32C
Velodyne
miniVUX-1UAV
M8-Core
Quanergy
1.95
Weight
Velodyne
1.65 Velodyne
Quanergy
miniVUX-1UAV
VLP-16
TeledyneVelodyne
1.59
Optech
PuckTeledyne
Velodyne
32MR
VLP-32E
Velodyne
Puck
VLP-16
VLP-32COptech
Velodyne32MR
miniVUX-1UAV
M8-Core
VelodyneQuanergy
VLP-16
Velodyne
RIEGLVLP-32C
miniVUX-1UAV
RIEGL RIEGL
M8-Core
VLP-16
miniVUX-1UAV
VLP-16
Velodyne
Optech
Puck
Quanergy
VLP-16
VLP-32C
M8-Core
VLP-16
32MR VLP-32E
VLP-32E
Velodyne **
M8-Core ** * * **
LiDARUSA
LiDAR SWISS
GeoCue
Brand LiDARUSA
LiDARGeoCue
BrandSWISS
M200
LiDARUSA
LiDAR LiDARUSA
Hovermap
LiDAR
Series
GeoCue
SWISS
Snoopy
VLP-32C
Model
Scanfly Brand
ULTRAGeo-MMS
HF1
Hovermap
SWISS
M200
Snoopy
VF1
A-series Series
Snoopy
M200
Scanfly LiDAR
HF1
Hovermap
M200
Snoopy
GeoCueVF1
A-series
VLP-32C
Model
ULTRA
Snoopy 150
Snoopy
Series 100
Snoopy
Scanfly
A-series CL-360
Series HF1
Hovermap
Snoopy
(V)40,
VF1
A-series
VLP-32C
Model
ULTRA 150
100
FOV
Scanfly
(V)40, 775
360
150 HF1
(H)360
(deg)
(H)360
ULTRA
100 (V)40,
VF1 150
100
FOV 360
(H)360
(V)40,
(V)40, (deg)2
(H)360 2360360 100
(H)360
FOV 360
(V)40,
(V)40, (H)360
(deg)
(H)3602 2700300
440
700
600
(V)40, 360 2
(H)360 300
440
700
2 2100
600 310
2
440
700 6 2 300
440
700
2 100
600 1.8
1.7
2
2.51
0.95 6
5 556 600 2 1 300
Velodyne
1.8
Quanergy
1.7
2
Velodyne
2.51
LiDAR
Velodyne
0.95 6 1.7
2.51 Velodyne
1.8
M8-Core
Quanergy
VLP-161.7
VLP-32E
Velodyne
Ultra2.51
Sensor
LiDAR
Velodyne
0.95 3 Lite Velodyne
Quanergy
52Puck 1.8
miniVUX-1UAV
M8-Core
Quanergy
VLP-16
VLP-32E Lite
Velodyne
GNSS
SensorM8-Core
LiDAR
Ultra IMU
Velodyne
Velodyne 0.95
VLP-32E Velodyne
M8-Core
VLP-16
VLP-32ELite
StorageCamera
GNSS
SensorIMU VLP-16
StorageCamera
GNSS Lite
IMUStorageCamera *
PhoenixGeodetics
Emesent
3D Target 3D
Phoenix
Snoopy
Brand
Geodetics
Geo-MMS
SCOUT-32
True
Emesent Scanfly
Geo-MMS
Target
Geo-MMS
Phoenix
3D View
Scanfly
miniVUX
Snoopy
Geodetics
Revolution LiDAR
Geo-MMS
HD2
410
True
Emesent
3DLiDAR Scanfly
3DIS
Geo-MMS
LiDAR
Surveyor
Target Target
LITE
Geo-MMS
Ultra
Phoenix View
M8
Scanfly
VLP-16
VLP-32C
miniVUX
Snoopy
Model
Geodetics
Snoopy
Revolution
60 HD2
100
Scanfly
410
True
Emesent
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
LITE
LiDAR
SurveyorGeo-MMS
Ultra
Scanfly
330
miniVUX
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Revolution
60 100
Scanfly
HD2120
3DIS
200
View
150
M8
(m)
Scanfly
VLP-16
100
Surveyor
200
LITE
miniVUX
LiDAR
HD2
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
LITE
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
330
Geo-MMS
(V)40,
120
(V)41.33,
410
True 3DIS
200
(V)20,
150
M8
(m)
360
View
VLP-16
Ultra 100
200
330
Revolution
60 100360 LiDAR
(H)360
120410
(H)360
LiDAR
LiDAR
360
(m)
60 330
100
(V)40,
120
3DIS
200
(V)20,
150
M8
(m)
360
FOV
360
VLP-16
100
200 (H)360
(V)40,
(H)360
360 322
Returns
52 (deg)
100
200360
360
(V)40,
2(H)360
(V)20,
150
100 (H)360
(H)360
360 322
Returns
52
Returns
100
300
430 52
(V)20,
**
300
600 360
222 Returns(H)360
360 322
52 300
430 100
4.6
** (cm)
300
600 **
5
36555
300 32222.4
300
430
2.9
4.6
1.53
1.95
365552(cm)
** (cm)
300
600 (kg)
1.6
1.59
2.7 555 430
300 2.9
Quanergy
300 (cm)
(kg)
5 1.95
Velodyne
4.6
1.53
Velodyne
1.95
365552 (kg)
Velodyne
1.6
miniVUX-1UAV
Velodyne
1.59
2.7
2.9
CL-360
RIEGL
1.6
PUCK
Puck 2.9
Velodyne
4.6
1.53
Velodyne
1.95
36532MR
Velodyne
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
M8-Core
Puck(kg)
Velodyne
1.6
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.59
VLP-32
2.7
LiDAR
CL-360
Lite
miniVUX-1UAV PUCK2Puck
Sensor
Velodyne
1.53
CL-360
Puck
Velodyne
32MR
Puck
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
M8-Core
Puck
RIEGL Velodyne
VLP-16 32MR
Lite
Ultra
miniVUX-1UAV
Velodyne
1.59
VLP-32 RIEGL
Velodyne
CL-360PUCK
Puck Puck
GNSS
Velodyne
32MR
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
M8-Core
Puck
Ultra
IMU **PUCK
M8-Ultra
M8-Core
Lite VLP-32E
VLP-16
Velodyne
VLP-32 VLP-16
Puck
StorageCamera ** * * ** *
Group
LiDARUSA
GeoCue Group
LiDARUSA
GeoCue SCOUT-16
Phoenix
Geo-MMS
LS
LS
Surveyor
LiDARUSA
SnoopyNano
VLP-32E
SCOUT-32
Nano
Hovermap
LiDAR
Group
LiDARUSA
Hovermap GeoCue VF1
Vux
M8
SCOUT-16
Geo-MMS
LS
LS
HF1
Surveyor
SCOUT-16
Surveyor
Hovermap
A-series
SnoopyNano
Snoopy
LS
Nano
Hovermap
LiDAR
Group
Surveyor
GeoCueVF1
Vux
Nano
VLP-32E
SCOUT-32 M8 LS
HF1
SCOUT-32
SCOUT-16
Ultra
LS
100
Geo-MMS
100
Surveyor
Hovermap
A-series
Snoopy
100
330
Nano
A-series
Vux
VLP-32E
SCOUT-32
100
200
Nano
Hovermap Vux
M8
(V)30,
(V)40,
LiDAR
VF1
HF1
100
Hovermap
A-series
(V)40,
100
330
200
200
(H)360
(V)41.33,
Geo-MMS
100 100
360
100
360
100
330
VLP-32E
100360
Hovermap100
(V)30,
(V)40,
LiDAR
VF1
(H)360
HF1
100
(V)40,
100
330
200
(H)360
(V)41.33,
(V)30,
100 (V)41.33,
360
(H)360
360
(V)40,
100360 3 2
360
225360
360
360
(V)30,
(V)40,
100
100
(V)40,
(H)360
100
200
(H)360
(V)41.33,
(H)360 360
(H)360
360
360 3 2
700
(V)40,
225 400
300
700
100
700
300
6002 25 360
(H)360
360 3 2
700
225 400
300
700
100
700
300
600
5.5
600
300
300
700
100
2
700 3 63
5 2
700
300
2 400
700
100
700
300
600
5.5
1.65
2.3
1.8
2.51
2.95
2.4
1.95
2
1.8
3 63 5.5
5 2 6 430
5
700
300
300
600
5.5
1.65
Velodyne
Velodyne
2.3
Teledyne
Velodyne
1.8
Velodyne
2.51
2.95
2.4
Quanergy
1.95
2
Velodyne
1.8
Velodyne
3
RIEGL 63 1.65
5 2.3
RIEGL
2.51
2.95
2.4
1.65
2.7VLP-16
VLP-32E
Velodyne
VLP-16
Velodyne
2.3
Optech
Teledyne
Velodyne
1.8
VLP-32E
Velodyne
2.51
2.95
2.4
Quanergy
1.95
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.8
VLP-32C
Velodyne
3 3Velodyne
Velodyne
Velodyne
Lite
RIEGL
Lite
Puck
miniVUX-1UAV
RIEGL
VLP-32E
Velodyne
VLP-16
VLP-16
Velodyne Velodyne
Optech
VLP-16
VLP-32E
Velodyne
Teledyne
RIEGL
VelodyneQuanergy
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.8
VLP-32C
Lite
VLP-32
VLP-16
Teledyne
Velodyne
1.8 Lite
RIEGL
Optech
VLP-32E
Lite
Velodyne
VLP-32E
Velodyne
VLP-16
Optech
VLP-16
Velodyne
VLP-32E
VLP-16 Lite
Velodyne
VLP-32CLite
Velodyne VLP-16
VLP-16
VLP-32C
* Lite
Lite
* * *
M200
Geo-MMS
True Series
View
Snoopy LiDARM200
Snoopy
Geo-MMS
410
True
miniVUX Series
3DIS
View
Snoopy
Geo-MMS LS
CL-360 M200
Snoopy
Nano
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
410
True
miniVUX 150
3DIS
Snoopy
LiDAR Series
M8
CL-360
775
200
View
330 M200
LiDARSnoopy
410
True(V)40,
150
Series
CL-360
775
(V)20,
miniVUX
CL-360 3DIS
200
View
330 (H)360
200
360 Snoopy
410
775 (V)40,
150
775
(V)20,
3DIS
200
330 (H)360
360 345 (V)40,
150
(V)20,
200 (H)360
360 345 440
(V)40,
310
430 3
(V)20,
100 (H)360
345 440
310
430
100 400
3 1
5 3 440
310
430
100 1.7
3
2.91
5 2 2 440 1.7
Quanergy
3
2.91
5 2
miniVUX-1UAV 1.95 M8-Core
1.7
2
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
3
2.9 2Quanergy
miniVUX-1UAV M8-Core
1.7
M8-Core
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
2
miniVUX-1UAVM8-Core
M8-Ultra
Quanergy M8-Core*
M8-Ultra * * *
Geodetics
3D
LiDAR Target
SWISS
Phoenix
Emesent Geodetics
3D
LiDAR Target
LiDARSWISS
Phoenix
3D
miniRANGER-LITE
Emesent TargetGeodetics
Scanfly
3D
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS LiDAR
SCOUT-16
PhoenixSWISS
VLP-32C
Scanfly Target
LITE
Phoenix
Revolution HD2
Emesent
ULTRA Geodetics
Scanfly
Snoopy
SWISS
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS VLP-16
Revolution
60
SCOUT-16
Scanfly LITE
LiDAR
Scanfly
HD2
250
VLP-32C
Revolution
SCOUT-16
Emesent
ULTRA
Scanfly Scanfly
miniVUX
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS VLP-16
HD2100
Revolution
60
LITE
120
SCOUT-16
VLP-32C
Scanfly
ULTRA 60 LITE
LiDAR
LiDARGeo-MMS
Geo-MMS
HD2
ULTRA VLP-16
60 100
(V)40,
120
(V)30,
(V)40, 330
LiDAR
360 LiDAR
(H)360
(H)360
360
VLP-32C
100
120
(V)41.33,
100
(H)360 VLP-16
100
(V)40,
120
(V)30,360
(H)360
(H)360
(V)40,
(V)41.33,
(V)30,
(V)40, (H)360
(V)41.33,
(V)40, 2360
2 100360
(V)40,
(V)30, (H)360
(H)360
5(H)360
360 (V)41.33,
(V)40,
(H)360 (H)360 2
2100300
600 2 4
252 360 2
21.5 300
600600 310
100
4.6
5.5
300
300 55 3221.55
300 1.6
1.59
4.6
1.53
1.95
600 5.5
1.65
0.95 55 5.5 55
4.6 1 300 Velodyne
1.6
Velodyne
1.59
Velodyne
4.6
1.53
Velodyne
1.95
5.5
1.65
Velodyne
0.95 55 1.651.6
1.53
1.95 Puck
Velodyne
2.9Puck 1.6
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.59
PUCK36532MR
Velodyne
1.53
Velodyne
Ultra1.95
1.65
Velodyne
Velodyne
0.95 Lite
VelodynePuck
Velodyne
VLP-16
Puck
Velodyne
Velodyne
Puck Lite
Velodyne
1.59
miniVUX-1UAV
PUCK
Velodyne
Puck
Velodyne
32MR
Puck
Ultra Lite
PUCK
Velodyne 32MR
VLP-16
Puck Puck
Puck
Ultra Lite M8-Core
VLP-16
Velodyne
PUCK32MR
Puck VLP-16 ** ** * * **
Group
GeoCue
LiDARUSA
Geo-MMS
Group
GeoCue
LiDARUSA
Surveyor
Geo-MMS LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Group
Ultra
GeoCue
SCOUT-32
LiDARUSALiDAR M8
Surveyor
Geo-MMS LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Group
Ultra
GeoCue
Surveyor
SCOUT-32 LiDAR 150
M8
Surveyor
200
Ultra
100
Geo-MMS
LiDARUSA
SCOUT-32
LiDAR
SCOUT-32
100 Geo-MMS
(V)20,
Ultra 150
M8
200
(V)40,
LiDAR 100
Geo-MMS
100360LiDAR
200
(H)360
100
(V)20,
150
M8
200
(V)40,
LiDAR 100
100360 32252360
(H)360 (V)20,
150360
(V)40,
100 32
(H)360252 430 (V)20,
700
7002522 360
(V)40, (H)360
32
252 430
(H)360 700
700
300700
36
6002 430
700
700 36
2.7
2.42 55 miniVUX-1UAV 430
700 2 0.95
Quanergy
36
Velodyne
2.7
miniVUX-1UAV
Velodyne
2.4 CL-360
2.7VLP-16
RIEGL
RIEGL
Velodyne
M8-Core
Quanergy
VLP-32
Velodyne
2.7
miniVUX-1UAV
VLP-32E
Velodyne
2.4 CL-360 Ultra
M8-Core
Quanergy
VLP-32
Velodyne
CL-360
Velodyne
miniVUX-1UAV
RIEGL
RIEGL
Puck
CL-360
miniVUX-1UAV
VLP-32
VLP-32E
Velodyne
RIEGL RIEGL
RIEGL
M8-Core
Quanergy
VLP-32
VLP-32E
Velodyne VLP-32E Lite * **
Phoenix
Geodetics
3D Target 3D
Group
Hovermap
Snoopy
True LS
LS
Geo-MMS
Group
View
Snoopy
Geo-MMS
Phoenix
Phoenix
M200 Nano
Scanfly
Geodetics
Target Nano
410
ULTRA
VF1
True
miniVUX
VLP-32E
Surveyor Hovermap
A-series
Snoopy
Vux
Geodetics
Scanfly
3D
3DIS
LS
Target
LITE
LiDARM8
View
Snoopy
LiDAR Snoopy
Geo-MMS
Phoenix
Series M200
Snoopy Nano
M200
ScanflyLS
Scanfly
LS
Geo-MMS
Group Scanfly
M8Nano
410VF1
Hovermap
A-series
Snoopy
True
miniVUX
VLP-32E
Surveyor Vux
Series
Nano
ULTRA
Geodetics
LITE
LiDAR
3DIS
Snoopy
LiDAR
LS 200
View
330
Geo-MMS
Surveyor
Series M200
Snoopy150
Series
330
Nano
Snoopy
Vux
Scanfly
Scanfly
ULTRA
M8
Geo-MMS
Group LS100
200
Nano
150
M8
410 VF1
Hovermap
A-series
Snoopy
True(V)40,
(V)20,
miniVUX
VLP-32E
100
Surveyor
miniVUX
200 LiDAR3DIS
Snoopy
Vux
ULTRA
LITE
M8
LiDAR
200
330
Geo-MMS
(V)40,
150
330
(V)30,
Geo-MMS 100
200
(V)20,
150
M8
360
View 410
VLP-32E
100
200360
330
100
(H)360
VF1
(H)360
A-series
(H)360
360
(V)41.33,
150
330
360
(H)360
LiDAR
(V)40,
(V)20,
3DIS
LiDAR 200
330
100
200
(V)40,
150
330
(V)30,
100
360
(H)360
360
(H)360 23
(H)360
360
(V)41.33,
(V)40,
(V)41.33,
(V)40,
200
(V)20,
150
M8360 3
(H)360 2 5 360
360 200360
(V)40,
100
(V)20,
200
(V)40,
(H)360
(V)30,
(H)360
(H)360
360
(H)360 2
(H)360
360
(V)41.33,
360
(V)20,
150 3
(H)360
3
2 5
300
700
(V)40,
430
(V)20,
100
300
600
(V)40,
440
100
600
300
400
430 2
(V)20,2 5
(H)360
3
3
(H)360
2
(H)360 2 5 700
430
100
300
600
440
100
600
300
400
430 600
2
3
3
23556
100
300
440
100 32 300 2.51
32 430
700
100
300
600
440
100
600
300
400
430
335562 25255 430
1.8
2.9
2.3
1.7
2
2.95
0.95
1.6
1.95
2
3
300
Velodyne
700
430
600 1.8
Velodyne
2.51
2.9
Velodyne
2.3
Velodyne
Teledyne
Quanergy
1.7
2
2.95
Velodyne
0.95
Velodyne
1.6
Quanergy
1.95
2
3
2.4
35562 0.95
Quanergy
3 2.9
2.3
1.7
2.95
Velodyne
1.8
VLP-32E
Velodyne
2.51
2.9
VLP-16
Velodyne
2.3
VLP-32C
Velodyne
Optech
Teledyne
M8-Core
Quanergy
Ultra
Puck 1.7
2.95
Velodyne
0.95
Velodyne
1.6
Velodyne
M8-Core
Quanergy
1.95
3
Lite
3362 Velodyne
M8-Ultra
Quanergy VLP-16
Velodyne
Quanergy
Puck
Lite
1.8
RIEGL
VLP-32E
M8-Core
Lite
Velodyne
2.51
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
2VLP-16
VLP-16
Velodyne
VLP-32C
Velodyne
Optech
Teledyne
Quanergy
Ultra
Puck M8-Core
Velodyne
Puck
Velodyne
Lite
Ultra
M8-Core
Quanergy
VLP-16
Puck
Velodyne
VLP-32E
M8-Core
Ultra
Puck
LiteVLP-16
Velodyne
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
VLP-16
VLP-32C
Velodyne
Optech
Teledyne
Puck
Lite
M8-Core
Quanergy
VLP-32E
M8-Ultra
VLP-32C
Optech
M8-Core
* *
LiDAR SWISSLiDAR Hovermap
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Revolution
3DSWISS
Target
SCOUT-16
VLP-32C
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
SCOUT-32
LiDAR HF1
Hovermap
VLP-16
LiDAR
Revolution
60 Scanfly
LS
SCOUT-16
Hovermap
VLP-32C HF1
Hovermap
Geo-MMS
Nano
Revolution
CL-360SCOUT-16
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
SCOUT-32
SWISS VLP-16
HF1 LiDAR
Revolution
60
LITE
M8
SCOUT-16
VLP-32C
10060
CL-360
775 LiDAR HF1
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
SCOUT-32
100 VLP-16
60
(V)30,LiDAR
100
200
VLP-32C
(V)40,
100
CL-360
775
100 (H)360
100
LiDAR
360 VLP-16
(V)30,
(V)30,
(V)40,
100
(V)30,
CL-360
775
100360 24360
(H)360
2 360 (V)30,
(V)40,
100
(H)360 (H)360
775360 224 700 300 232 360
(V)40,
310
700 (H)360
360 2
24 700 300700
310
700 4.6
300
400
5.56
30015
2 24 700
310
700 1.8
1.59
4.6
1.53
300 5.5
1.65
6
2.415 5.5
2 4.632 700 300
310 miniVUX-1UAV
Velodyne
1.8
Velodyne
1.5915 2.4
Velodyne
4.6
1.53
5.5
1.65
Velodyne
6
miniVUX-1UAV
2.42 1.6
1.95
1.8
1.53
1.65 miniVUX-1UAV
VLP-16
Velodyne
PUCK1.8
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.59
Velodyne
1.53
1.65
Velodyne
VLP-32E
Velodyne
miniVUX-1UAV
2.4 Lite
615Velodyne
Quanergy miniVUX-1UAV
VLP-16
Velodyne
VLP-16
PUCK
miniVUX-1UAV
Velodyne VLP-16
VLP-32E Lite
Velodyne
1.59
Velodyne
Puck
Velodyne
Velodyne PUCK
VLP-16VLP-16
Lite
M8-Core VLP-16
PUCK
Lite
miniVUX-1UAV
miniVUX-1UAV VLP-32ELite VLP-32E
Velodyne
Velodyne VLP-16 *** *** ** ***
GeoCue
Emesent
LiDARUSA GeoCue
LiDAR
Emesent
Emesent
LiDARUSA SurveyorGeoCue
SWISS
Geo-MMSLiDARUSALiDAR
Geo-MMS
Emesent
VLP-32E Ultra SCOUT-32
GeoCue
VLP-32E
Surveyor LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Ultra VLP-32E
Surveyor
200 LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Ultra 200 100
VLP-32E
360 LiDAR 200360 2 360 2 6002 2 600 5 600 2.7 5 2 Velodyne
2.7 5 RIEGL
CL-360 VLP-32
Velodyne
2.7 RIEGLVLP-32
CL-360 RIEGL
Velodyne
CL-360VLP-32 RIEGL
CL-360 *
Geodetics
Phoenix LiDARUSA
Snoopy
True View
Snoopy
Geodetics
Geo-MMS
Hovermap
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
Phoenix A-series
410Snoopy
True
miniVUX 3DIS
Snoopy
Geodetics
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
LiDAR HF1
LiDAR Surveyor
View
M8
Hovermap
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
Phoenix VLP-16 A-series
Snoopy 410
True
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
LiDAR HF1
LiDAR Ultra
Snoopy
100
3DIS
200
View
A-series
miniVUX
Snoopy
Geodetics 330
150
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS M8
200
Hovermap
VLP-16
100 A-series
410
True
LiDAR (V)40,
miniVUX
Geo-MMS 100
3DIS
Snoopy200
View
330
(V)20,
HF1
LiDAR
LiDAR 150
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS M8
(V)40,
200
VLP-16
100 200
(H)360
(H)360
410
100
miniVUX
LiDAR
(H)360
LiDAR
360 (H)360
(V)40,
100
3DIS
200
(V)20,
LiDAR 150
M8
(V)40,
200
VLP-16
100 (H)360
(V)40,
330 32522360
(H)360
360 360 (H)360
(V)40,
200
(H)360
330
(V)20,
150
(V)40,
200
100 (H)360
32522 430
(H)360
360 700
100
(V)20,
600
(V)40,
300 22 360 32522 430
(H)360
(H)360 700 300
100
600
300 600
32556
700 700 5.5
325 430
100
600
300 2.51
325562 5.5
2.9
1.8
1.59 65 430
600
300Velodyne
2.51
325562 0.95
Quanergy
100 2.9
Velodyne
Velodyne
1.8
Velodyne
1.59
Teledyne 2.7VLP-16
2.51
RIEGLVLP-32E
Velodyne
2.51
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
352Puck
2.9
M8-Core
VLP-32C
Velodyne
Velodyne
1.8
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.59
Optech
Teledyne Velodyne
RIEGL
Lite 2VLP-32
VLP-32E
Velodyne
M8-Ultra
VelodyneQuanergy
VLP-32E
2.9
M8-Core
VLP-32C
Velodyne
VLP-16
Velodyne
VLP-16 RIEGL
Lite
Velodyne
1.59
RIEGL
Optech
Teledyne VLP-32E
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
M8-Core
VLP-32C
Velodyne
VLP-16
VLP-16
Velodyne
Optech
Teledyne M8-Ultra
M8-Core
Lite VLP-32C
VLP-16
Optech
Group M200
Group Series
SCOUT-16
Phoenix
Scanfly ULTRA
Surveyor
Group VF1
M200
SnoopySeries
SCOUT-16
Hovermap
M200
Scanfly
Surveyor
Scanfly
GroupVF1
M200
Snoopy
Series
SCOUT-16
ULTRAULTRA
Surveyor Series
SCOUT-16
HF1
VF1
Snoopy
Scanfly
100 ULTRA
Surveyor VF1
Snoopy
(V)30,
100 100
150
(V)41.33,
(V)40, (H)360
360
100 (V)30,
(V)40,
(V)41.33,
(V)30,
(V)40,
100 (H)360
360
(V)41.33,
(V)40, (V)30,
(H)360
(V)41.33,
(V)40,
(H)360
360 (H)360
360 440
600
300 22 22 440
600
300 5.5
440
600
300 440
600
300 1.7
1.65
0.95
2.3 532 5 Quanergy
1.7
5.5
1.65
Velodyne
0.95
Velodyne
2.3
miniVUX-1UAV 1.8
1.7
1.65
2.3 Quanergy
Ultra 1.7
1.65
Velodyne
Velodyne
0.95
VLP-16
Velodyne
2.3
Velodyne Quanergy
miniVUX-1UAVVelodyneQuanergy
VLP-16
Ultra M8-Core
Velodyne
VLP-16Puck
Velodyne
Ultra Lite
Ultra
Puck
VLP-16
miniVUX-1UAV Puck
VLP-16
miniVUX-1UAV * * * *
LS Nano
VLP-32C VuxLS Nano
VLP-32C VuxLS 330
Nano
VLP-32C
100 Vux 330360
VLP-32C
(V)40,
100 (H)360 330360
(V)40,
100360 245360
(H)360
32 360 245 400100 245 400 100 15 100 2.9515 25 400 2.9515 RIEGL 2.95 *
Emesent Emesent
LiDAR SWISS
LiDARUSA
Phoenix
GeoCue LiDAR
Geo-MMS
LiDARUSA
Geo-MMS
Emesent
LS
SWISS
Phoenix
LiDAR
GeoCue
LiDARUSA
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
SCOUT-32
Revolution
VLP-32E
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS LiDAR
LiDARUSA
LiDAR
Phoenix
SWISS
Hovermap GeoCue
LS
SWISS
LiDAR
VF1
LS
CL-360
Geo-MMS
Emesent
Nano M8 Nano
SCOUT-32
Revolution
60 Nano
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
VLP-32E
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS VLP-16
LiDAR
Hovermap
LiDAR
M8
LiDAR
Vux
CL-360
LS775
Geo-MMS
200
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
VF1
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Nano
SCOUT-32
100
Revolution
SCOUT-32
Revolution60 60
VLP-32E
200
VLP-16
100
Hovermap
LiDAR
M8
LiDAR
LiDAR
CL-360
LS
60 775
Geo-MMS
200
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
330
LiDAR
Nano
100360
100
VLP-32E
(V)40,
200
VLP-16
VF1 100
M8
(H)360
LiDAR
360
(H)360
CL-360
LiDAR 775
200
100
(V)40,
LiDAR 200
VLP-16
100 (H)360
360
(H)360 2 360(V)40,
100
200
(V)40,
200
100
(H)360
775360 32
(H)360
360
(H)360 2
700
(V)40,
310
700
300
600
(V)40,
300 25 360 (H)360
32
(H)360
360 2
700
310
700
300 4.6
600
300
26
100
700
300
3556 32 4 700
2 400
310
700
600
300
26
1.95
300 4.62.4
1.53
3556 4.6
1.59
1.8
700
310
600
300
Velodyne
26
Quanergy
1.95
2.4
Velodyne
4.6
1.53
miniVUX-1UAV
Velodyne
Velodyne
1.59
Velodyne
1.8
2.95
1.53
3556 CL-360
VLP-32E
Velodyne
26
M8-Core1 Velodyne
Quanergy
1.95
PUCK2.4
Velodyne
1.53
2.4VLP-16
miniVUX-1UAV
VLP-32C
Velodyne
35 Velodyne
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.59
Velodyne
1.8 RIEGL
VLP-32E
Velodyne
M8-Core
Quanergy
1.95
PUCK
Velodyne
miniVUX-1UAV
CL-360
Lite VLP-32C
VLP-16 PUCK
VelodyneRIEGL
miniVUX-1UAV
RIEGL
VLP-32E
CL-360
Velodyne
1.59
VLP-16
Velodyne Lite
Velodyne VLP-32E
M8-Core
Quanergy
PUCK
VLP-32C
VLP-16 CL-360
Velodyne
Velodyne
VLP-16 Lite
M8-Core
VLP-32C
VLP-16 * * * *
Geodetics Phoenix
Snoopy
GeoCue
Snoopy
Surveyor
Geodetics
Geo-MMS
Hovermap A-series
LiDAR
VLP-32C Snoopy
miniVUX
Snoopy
Ultra
GeodeticsSurveyor
Geo-MMS
HF1 M8
Hovermap
SnoopyA-series
Hovermap
Snoopy
LiDARSnoopy
miniVUX
Snoopy
Ultra
Geo-MMS
Surveyor
Hovermap
VLP-32C HF1 VF1
A-series
330
Surveyor
Geodetics 200
150
M8
Hovermap
100
miniVUX
Ultra
HF1 A-series
LiDAR
VLP-32C (V)40,
miniVUX
Ultra
Geo-MMS 330
200
(V)20,
HF1 150
M8
100 (H)360
100
(V)41.33,
100
360
(H)360
LiDAR
330
200
100
VLP-32C (V)40,
330
200
(V)20,
150
M8
100 (H)360
(V)41.33,
360(H)360
(V)40,
(H)360
3 52
(V)41.33, 2360
360
360 (V)40,
(V)20,
150 (H)360
(V)41.33,
(H)360360
(H)360
3 52 2 700
100
600
430 2
(V)20,
300 2 2
52 (H)360
3 52 2 700
100
600
430
300 300
700
3
100
600
300 3 700
100
600
430
300 2.51
2.9
2.7
3
1.8 3
3 56 430Velodyne
2.51
2.9
Velodyne
2.7
Quanergy
3
Velodyne
1.8
Teledyne 1.8
2.51
2.9
2.7
1.8 VLP-32E
Velodyne
2.51
Velodyne
2.9
VLP-32
Velodyne
2.7
M8-Core
Quanergy
VLP-163
Velodyne
1.8
Optech
Teledyne
Velodyne Lite VLP-32E
Velodyne
VLP-16
VLP-32E
VLP-32
Velodyne
M8-Core
Quanergy
VLP-16
Velodyne
Velodyne
Optech Lite
VLP-32
Teledyne
VLP-16 VLP-32E
Lite
VLP-32
M8-Core
Quanergy
VLP-16
Optech
Lite Lite
Teledyne M8-Core
Optech
TrueSCOUT-16
M200
Geo-MMS View
SCOUT-32
Series
LiDAR410
True
M200
Geo-MMS
SCOUT-16
3DIS
View
True
Snoopy
M200
CL-360 410
True
View
SCOUT-32
Series M200
SCOUT-32
Series
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
SCOUT-16
410
Snoopy100
3DIS
200
View
1503DIS
SCOUT-32
100
Series
Snoopy
CL-360
775 410
LiDAR
(V)30,
SCOUT-16
(V)40,
Snoopy
Geo-MMS
100
(V)20,
3DIS
100
(V)40,
150
CL-360
775
(H)360
200LiDAR
200
(H)360
100
150
(V)30,
(V)40,
100
(V)20,
200 (H)360
(V)20,
100
(V)40,
150
(V)40,
CL-360
775
23
242360
(H)360 (V)30,
(V)40,
100 (H)360
(V)20,
(H)360
(V)40,
(H)360
775
(H)360
23
242 400 (V)30,
700
(V)40,
430
700
440
31032 (H)360
2
3
242 400 700
430
700
440
310
5.5
4302615
3
700
440
2 430700
700
440
45 400
310
5.5
1.65
26152 325 400
3
2.4
1.7 300
700
310
Velodyne
5.5
1.65
Velodyne
26152 RIEGL
Quanergy
3
2.4
miniVUX-1UAV
Quanergy
1.7 2.4
1.7
VLP-16
Velodyne
5.5
1.65
2 VLP-32E
Velodyne
6Quanergy
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
152Quanergy
2.4
miniVUX-1UAV
M8-Core
Quanergy
1.7 RIEGLVLP-16
Velodyne
1.65
VLP-32E
Velodyne
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
M8-Ultra
M8-Core
Quanergy
miniVUX-1UAV RIEGL
miniVUX-1UAV
M8-Core
VLP-16
Velodyne
VLP-32E
Velodyne
M8-Ultra
M8-Core RIEGL VLP-16
VLP-32E ** ** * ** *
Emesent
Group
GeoCue Emesent
Geo-MMS
Emesent
Group LS
Geo-MMS
Group
GeoCue LS
GeoCue Emesent
Surveyor
VLP-32E
Nano LiDAR
GroupM8 LS
LiDAR
GeoCue
Nano Surveyor
Geo-MMS
VLP-32E
Geo-MMS
VuxLS Nano LiDAR
Surveyor
Nano M8
LiDARLS100
Surveyor
Geo-MMS
VLP-32E
200
Geo-MMS
VuxLS Nano
330
Nano LiDAR
M8
LiDARLS100
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
VuxLS VLP-32E
200
330 100
Nano
360
Nano
(H)360 LiDAR
M8
LiDAR
Vux 100
200
330360
(H)3603
(H)360 5 200
330360
(H)360 3 5 300
100 2 360 3 5 300
100 300
2 5 3 300
100 2.3
1.95
2
2.95 5 100 Velodyne
2.3
Quanergy
1.95
2
2.95 5 2.3
RIEGL VLP-16
Velodyne
2.3
M8-Core
Quanergy
1.95
2
2.95 RIEGLVLP-16
Velodyne Velodyne
VLP-16
M8-Core
Quanergy
1.95
2.95 RIEGL VLP-16
M8-Core
Quanergy M8-Core
Geodetics
Phoenix Geodetics
Geo-MMS
Hovermap
Phoenix
True ViewGeodetics
Revolution
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Phoenix
410VF1
True Geodetics
Revolution
60
VLP-16
LiDAR
HovermapGeo-MMS
Hovermap
3DIS
View 410 Revolution
60
VF1 200
VLP-16
100
Hovermap
Phoenix
Revolution
True 100
VF1
3DIS
200 LiDAR
60
View Geo-MMS60
(V)40,
410VF1 200
VLP-16
100
(V)40,
100
(V)20,
3DIS
200 (H)360
LiDAR
360
100
(H)360
100
(V)41.33, (V)40,
200
VLP-16
100
(V)40,
100
(V)20,
200 (H)360
360 2
(H)360
(V)41.33,23452360360 (V)40,
200
100
(V)40,
100
(V)20, (H)360
360 2
(H)360
(V)41.33, 2 600
(V)40,
300
700
3452 430 (H)360
360
252 (V)41.33,
(V)40, 2
(H)360
2
3452 430600
300430
700 4.6355
300
30036 2 430
2 300 4.6
600
700 1.53
3552 4.6
1.59
1.8
36 35 700 600
300
Velodyne3552 CL-360
Velodyne
4.6
1.53
Velodyne
Velodyne
1.59
Teledyne
1.8
Velodyne
36
Quanergy
miniVUX-1UAV 1.53
1.8 PUCK
Velodyne
1.53
VLP-32C
Velodyne
VLP-16 35Quanergy
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.59
Optech
Teledyne
Velodyne
1.8
VLP-32E
Velodyne
6
Velodyne
M8-Ultra
Quanergy 2 Lite
miniVUX-1UAV RIEGL
CL-360PUCK
VLP-32C
Velodyne
VLP-16
VLP-16
Velodyne
Velodyne
VLP-32E CL-360
Velodyne
Velodyne
1.59
Optech
Teledyne
Lite
PUCK
Velodyne
VLP-16
M8-Ultra
Quanergy PUCK
VLP-32C
VLP-16
miniVUX-1UAVVLP-32E
Lite CL-360
Velodyne
VLP-16
Velodyne
Optech
Teledyne
Lite
Velodyne
M8-Ultra VLP-32C
VLP-16
Optech
VLP-32E
miniVUX-1UAV
LiDAR SWISS
LiDARUSA LiDAR
LiDARUSASnoopy
SWISS
LiDARUSA
Geo-MMS LiDAR
Snoopy miniVUX
LiDARUSA
VLP-32C
SCOUT-16
Geo-MMS LiDAR Snoopy
A-series
Geo-MMS True
SWISS
LiDAR Snoopy
Snoopy miniVUX
View
LiDAR
VLP-32C
SCOUT-16
CL-360
Geo-MMS LiDAR Snoopy
Geo-MMS
Snoopy 410
SWISS
LiDAR 330
miniVUX
A-series
Snoopy
100 miniVUX
3DIS
A-series
VLP-32C
SCOUT-16
CL-360
775
Geo-MMS
A-seriesLiDAR
Geo-MMS
LiDAR 330
(V)40,
100360
200
330
(H)360
VLP-32C
(V)30,
CL-360
775
Geo-MMS LiDAR
360
100 330
(V)40,
100
(V)30,360
(V)20,
CL-360
LiDAR 775 (H)360
360
(V)40, (H)360
360 360
(V)40,
(V)30,
775
(H)360 (H)360
360 100
700
300
3103 360 100
700
300
310 100
5.5 1 6 4 100
700
300
310 2.9
2.51
5.5
1.651 6 310 2.9
Velodyne
2.51
Velodyne
5.5
1.651 6 2
2.9 2.9
VLP-32E
Velodyne
2.51
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.65
1 M8-Ultra
VLP-32E
Velodyne
VLP-16
Velodyne VLP-32E
VLP-16
Group
Geodetics
GeoCue Geodetics
Surveyor
Geo-MMS
Group VLP-32E
SCOUT-32
Group
LS
Ultra
LiDAR
Geodetics
Nano M8
Surveyor
Geo-MMS
Group M8 SCOUT-16
VLP-32E
SCOUT-32 Ultra
LiDAR
Surveyor
Geo-MMS
LS Nano
Surveyor
Geo-MMS 200
VLP-32E
150
M8
SCOUT-32
LiDAR
Geodetics
M8 LS100
Ultra
200
NanoM8 Ultra
LiDAR
M8
200
VLP-32E
(V)20,
150
M8 (H)360
SCOUT-32
LS100
200 200
150
Nano
360 M8
(V)30,
200
(V)20,
150
100 (H)360
(V)20,
200360 3322360 (V)20, (H)360
100360
(H)360
200 3322 400 322 360
600
430
700 332
2 400 600430
430
700 700
300
3
600
23 25 322 400600 2.4
430
700 2.7
3 25 5.5 365 600 700 2.7
Quanergy
3
2.4
miniVUX-1UAV 2.51
1.65
25 CL-360
RIEGL VLP-32
2.7
2.7 M8-Core
Quanergy
2.4 Velodyne
Velodyne
2Quanergy
miniVUX-1UAV RIEGL VLP-32E
VLP-32VLP-16
M8-Core
Quanergy
2.4 RIEGL
VLP-32
miniVUX-1UAV
M8-Core
miniVUX-1UAV VLP-32RIEGL
M8-Core ** ** * ** *
Geo-MMS
M200
GeoCue LS
GeoCue Series LiDAR
GeoCue
Nano
Surveyor Geo-MMS
M200
Snoopy
VuxLS Series
Nano
M200 LiDAR
Geo-MMS
M200
Snoopy
Vux
Series
Surveyor LS 150
Series
330
Nano
Snoopy
100
SurveyorLiDAR
Geo-MMS
Snoopy
Vux(V)40,
LS 150
330
Nano
(H)360
100 150
Surveyor
360 LiDAR
(H)360(V)40,
Vux 150
330 (H)360
(H)360
(V)40,
100360 (V)40,
5 (H)360330 (H)360
(H)360 5 600
(V)40,
440
100 2 (H)360(H)360 5 600
440
100 440 5 100 1.95
5 600
440 23
1.7
2.95 5 2 400 100 1.95
23
Velodyne
Quanergy
1.7
2.95 5 1.7 VLP-32C 1.95
23
Velodyne
M8-Core
Quanergy
1.7
2.95 CL-360
5 Quanergy 1.95
VLP-32C
Velodyne
M8-Core
Quanergy
2.95 CL-360
M8-Core Quanergy
VLP-32C
M8-Core CL-360
Velodyne M8-Core
VLP-32C
Phoenix
LiDAR SWISSLiDARPhoenix
Phoenix
True View
Geo-MMS
SWISS
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS Phoenix
VLP-32C
LiDAR 410
True
LiDAR
Revolution
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
SCOUT-16 SWISS
Geo-MMS VLP-32C
3DIS
LiDAR View
Geo-MMS
True
LiDAR
M8
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS 410
True
View
LiDAR
Revolution
60
VLP-16
LiDAR
SCOUT-16 SWISS
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
LiDAR
Revolution
LiDAR VLP-32C
100
3DIS
LiDAR 200
View
Geo-MMS
410150
M83DIS
Revolution
60
VLP-16
10060 410
LiDAR
LiDAR
M8
VLP-16
SCOUT-16 60 VLP-32C
(V)40,
100
(V)20,
LiDAR3DIS
200
Geo-MMS
150
M8
VLP-16
100
(V)30,
(H)360
200
(H)360
360
150
100
100
(H)360
(V)40,
100
(V)20,
LiDAR
(V)41.33, 200
(V)41.33,
150
100
(V)30, 322360
(H)360
2
(H)360
(V)41.33,
360
(V)20,
(H)360
100
(H)360
360
360
(V)40,
100
(V)20, (H)360
(V)41.33, 2
(H)360
360
(V)30, (H)360322 430300
700
(V)40,
300
3 2 2
360 322 430
(H)360
2 300
700
300 365
4.6
430
300
300
5.5
22 430
300
700
300
2.3
3652 4.6
4.6
1.53
1.59
5.5
1.65 35
300
700 Velodyne
2.3
Teledyne
Velodyne
3652 1.59
Quanergy
miniVUX-1UAV
Velodyne
4.6
1.53
Velodyne
1.59
5.5
1.65
RIEGL
1.53
VLP-16
Velodyne
2 VLP-32E
2.3
Optech
Teledyne
Velodyne
6Quanergy
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
M8-Core
PUCK
Velodyne
1.53
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.59
1.65
RIEGL
2Velodyne
miniVUX-1UAV VLP-16
Velodyne
2.3
Optech
Teledyne
VLP-32E
Velodyne
M8-Ultra
QuanergyRIEGL
miniVUX-1UAV
RIEGL
M8-Ultra
M8-Core
PUCK
Velodyne
VLP-16
VelodyneVelodyne
M8-Core
PUCK
VLP-16
VLP-16
Velodyne
Optech
Teledyne
VLP-32E
Velodyne
M8-Ultra
M8-Core
PUCK
VLP-16
VLP-16
Optech
VLP-32E
miniVUX-1UAV
Geo-MMS
Snoopy
LS LiDAR
Geo-MMS
NanominiVUX
VLP-32E CL-360
Snoopy
M8 LS LiDAR
Geo-MMS
SCOUT-16
miniVUX
VLP-32E
Nano CL-360
Snoopy
M8 LS775
330 LiDAR
Geo-MMS
miniVUX
VLP-32E
200
Nano M8 CL-360
775
330LiDAR
360
100
VLP-32E
LS200
Nano M8 CL-360
775
330
200360
(V)30, 45
322360 775
(H)360
200360 45
322 400 310
100 2 360 45
32 400 310
100 3001
5
2365 4
322 400310
100 2.91
5 5.5 310 2.91
5 1.65 1
2.9 Velodyne VLP-16
Group LiDARUSA
LiDARUSA
Geodetics Group
Geodetics
Surveyor Group
LiDARUSA
SCOUT-32
Group
LiDARUSA
Snoopy A-series
LSSurveyor
Nano
VLP-32C Ultra Snoopy
SCOUT-32
Snoopy
GeodeticsSurveyor
VuxLS Nano
VLP-32C
Surveyor
miniVUX
A-series
Snoopy Ultra SCOUT-32
100
Snoopy
SCOUT-32
A-series
Geodetics
Surveyor
VuxLS 200
330
Nano
VLP-32C
100
Surveyor
(V)40,
A-series
Ultra 100
Surveyor
VuxLS 200
330
330
(H)360
100
360
Nano
VLP-32C
(H)360
100
Surveyor
360
(V)40,
Ultra
Vux
100
200
330
(H)360
(V)40,
360
(H)360
100360
(V)40,
(H)360
25 (H)360200
330
(H)360
360
(H)360
100360
600
(V)40,
700
600
25 440
100
300
25 360 (H)360
36024252 440
600
700
600 700
100
300
100
5 600 1.95
600
700
5 440
100
2365 2
2.4
2.51
2.7
2.95 5 6 300
5 400 600
600
100
2365 RIEGL
Quanergy
1.95
Velodyne
2.4
2.51
Velodyne
2.7
2.95
2.9
5 CL-360
miniVUX-1UAV
Teledyne
M8-Core
Quanergy
1.95
235 Velodyne
2.4 VLP-32C
2.51 Velodyne
2.4
VLP-32E
2.51
VLP-32
Velodyne
2.7
miniVUX-1UAV
Optech
Teledyne
2.95
RIEGLM8-Core
Quanergy
1.95
VLP-32C
Velodyne
VLP-32E
VLP-32
CL-360
5 miniVUX-1UAV
RIEGL
VLP-32E
Velodyne
2.7
2.95
M8-Core
VLP-32C
CL-360
miniVUX-1UAV
Optech
Teledyne VLP-32 RIEGL
Quanergy
Velodyne
VLP-32E
Velodyne
Optech CL-360
Teledyne
M8-Core
VLP-32C
VLP-32
Optech
** ** ** **
Phoenix
LiDAR SWISSLiDAR Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
M200
Phoenix
Geo-MMS
SWISS
Geo-MMS LiDAR
Series
Phoenix
Geo-MMS LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
M200
Geo-MMS
LiDAR LiDAR
LiDAR VLP-16
Snoopy
Phoenix
LiDAR LiDAR
Series
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
M200
CL-360
Geo-MMS
SWISS
Geo-MMS M8
Geo-MMSLiDARLiDAR
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
M200
Geo-MMS
LiDAR LiDAR
LiDAR
Geo-MMSVLP-16
Snoopy
LiDAR
Series 100
150
Series
LiDAR
CL-360
LiDAR775
Geo-MMS
SWISS150
M8
100
LiDAR
LiDAR
VLP-16
Snoopy
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
LiDAR
LiDAR
M8
VLP-16
Snoopy100
(V)40,
150360
CL-360
775
Geo-MMS
(V)20,
150
M8
(V)40,
100
(H)360
100
150
LiDAR
360
(H)360
150
(H)360
100
(V)40,
150360
CL-360
LiDAR
(V)41.33, 775
(V)20,
150360(H)360
(H)360
(V)40,3224360
(V)41.33,
(H)360
(V)41.33,
(V)20,
(V)40,
100 (H)360 775360
(V)40, (H)360
360
(V)41.33,
(V)20,
(H)360
(V)40, 3224 430
(H)360
(H)360
300
3222 360
310
700 360 32 430 300
310
700 32615
300
440
430 42 430
300
300
310
700
2.3
1.59
32615 3652 310
1.7 Velodyne
2.3
Velodyne
1.59
32615 1.59
Quanergy
1.7
miniVUX-1UAV
Quanergy
Velodyne RIEGL
RIEGL
VLP-16
Velodyne
2.3
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.59
1.7 M8-Core
Quanergy
1.7
M8-Core Velodyne
Quanergy
1Quanergy
miniVUX-1UAV
Quanergy
VLP-32E
Velodyne RIEGL
RIEGL
VLP-16
Velodyne
2.3
VLP-16
Velodyne
M8-Core
Quanergy
VLP-16
M8-Core
miniVUX-1UAV
M8-Core
QuanergyRIEGL
M8-Core
VLP-32E
Velodyne
RIEGL RIEGL
VLP-16
Velodyne
VLP-16
M8-Core VLP-16
miniVUX-1UAV
M8-Core
VLP-32E RIEGL
LS Nano
Revolution
SCOUT-32
LS Nano
SCOUT-16 M8
VuxLS Nano
Revolution
60
SCOUT-32
LS Nano M8
Vux
SCOUT-32
SCOUT-16 LS
LS 200
Nano
Revolution
60SCOUT-32
100
330
Nano
SCOUT-16 M8
Vux LS200
100
LS330
330 100
Nano
360
Revolution
60
(V)40,
Nano
(V)30, 100 M8
(H)36060
Vux (V)40,
200
(V)40,
100
330
(V)30,360 3
(H)360
2 (H)360
200
100360
(V)40,
5 (H)360330
(V)30, 3
(H)360
2 400
300
600
(V)40,
700
5 100
100 3
(H)360
2
25 3605252 100 400
300
600
700
100 700
2
4.63
700 5 3 2 400
300
600
700
5 100
100 1.95
2
4.6
1.53
3
2.4
2.95 5 2 400
300
600
100Quanergy
1.95
2
Velodyne
4.6
1.53
Velodyne
3
2.4
Teledyne
2.95 5 2.9CL-360M8-Core
Quanergy
1.95
PUCK2
Velodyne
4.6
1.53
VLP-32C
Velodyne
3
2.4
2.4 Optech
Teledyne
2.95 Velodyne
5 Velodyne VLP-32E
M8-Core
CL-360Quanergy
1.95
PUCK
Velodyne
1.53
VLP-32C
Velodyne
Optech
Teledyne
2.95 M8-Core
CL-360Quanergy
PUCK
VLP-32C CL-360
Velodyne
Velodyne
Optech M8-Core
VLP-32C
Teledyne Optech PUCK
LiDARUSA LiDARUSASnoopy
Geo-MMSSurveyor miniVUX
VLP-32E
Geo-MMS
LiDARUSA
SnoopyLiDARUSA
VLP-32C
LiDAR Snoopy
Ultra
Geo-MMS
Surveyor Surveyor
LiDAR SCOUT-16
Geo-MMSminiVUX
VLP-32E
Snoopy
Geo-MMS
A-series
Snoopy Snoopy
Ultra
LiDAR
A-series
VLP-32C
Snoopy
CL-360
LiDAR
Surveyor 330
Surveyor
200
Snoopy
Geo-MMS LiDAR
CL-360
775
100 miniVUX
VLP-32E
miniVUX
Geo-MMS
VLP-32E Ultra
LiDAR
A-series
VLP-32C
A-seriesLiDAR
Geo-MMS
Surveyor 200
(V)40,360
Surveyor
CL-360
775
100 330 Ultra
(H)360
VLP-32C
(H)360
100
LiDAR
360
Surveyor (V)30,
330
200
(V)40,360
CL-360
775
100 (H)360
(H)360
(V)40,
360 4522360
(H)360 200360
(V)40,
775
100 (H)360
(H)360
(H)360360 4522 700
600
700
310
300 2 360242 700 600 5.5
700
310
300 300
100
7005
165 600 5.5
422 700
700
310
300
1.65
2.9
2.7
2.51
2.3165 5.5
5 56 310600
300
Velodyne
5.5
1.65
2.9165 1.65
5
Velodyne
2.7
Velodyne
2.51
Velodyne
2.3
miniVUX-1UAV
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.65
2.9
VLP-32
Velodyne
2.7
2.51 VLP-32E155 Velodyne
Velodyne
2.51
VLP-16
Velodyne
2.3
miniVUX-1UAV
VLP-16
Velodyne
VLP-32
Velodyne
2.7
VLP-32E
VelodyneVelodyne
VLP-32E
VLP-16
Velodyne
2.3
miniVUX-1UAV
VLP-16
VLP-16VLP-32E
VLP-32
Velodyne
VLP-16
Velodyne VLP-32
VLP-16
miniVUX-1UAV * * * *
LiDAR SWISS
Geodetics LiDAR SWISS
Geodetics
Geo-MMS LiDAR
LiDAR
Geo-MMSSWISS
Geodetics LiDAR
VLP-16
LiDAR SWISS
Geo-MMS VLP-16
100 LiDAR VLP-16
100360 100360 miniVUX-1UAV miniVUX-1UAV miniVUX-1UAV
Phoenix Phoenix
Geodetics
M200 LSVLP-32E
Phoenix
Geo-MMSNano
Series Geo-MMS
M8
M200
Phoenix
Revolution LS
Snoopy
LiDAR
Geo-MMS Nano
Series
VLP-32E
Geo-MMS
Revolution
60
LiDAR
M8
M200 LS
Snoopy
LiDAR
100
200
150
Geo-MMS
VLP-16
Nano
Series
VLP-32E
LiDAR
Revolution
60 100 M8
M200 (V)40,
LS
Snoopy100
200
(V)40,
LiDAR 150 100
(H)360
100
Nano
360
Series M8
(H)360
(V)41.33,
Revolution
60 100360
(V)40,
100
Snoopy(V)40,
200
(V)40,
60 150
100360 32222360
(H)360
(H)360
(V)41.33,
(V)41.33,
360
(H)360
200360
(V)40,
360
(V)40,
150
100 32222 400
(H)360
(H)360
(V)41.33,
360
300
44022
(V)40,
300 360 322 400
(H)360
360
300
440
300 265
300
700
4.6 322 400300
440
300
1.59
265 65 400
1.95
1.7
4.6
1.53 440
300
Velodyne
1.59
265 1.59
Velodyne
1.95
Quanergy
1.7
Velodyne
4.6
1.53 RIEGL
CL-360 VLP-16
Velodyne
1.59
VLP-32E
Velodyne
2Velodyne
1.95
M8-Core
Quanergy
PUCK1.7
Velodyne
4.6
1.53 RIEGLVLP-16
CL-360 Velodyne
miniVUX-1UAV
VLP-16
VLP-32E
Velodyne
VLP-32E
1.95
M8-Core
Quanergy
1.7
PUCK RIEGL
CL-360
Velodyne
1.53
VLP-16
VLP-32E
M8-Core RIEGL
CL-360
Quanergy
PUCK
Velodyne M8-Core PUCK
LS Nano
Surveyor
Surveyor VuxLS
Ultra VLP-32E
Nano
Surveyor
Surveyor VuxLS
Ultra 330
NanoLiDAR
100
Surveyor
Surveyor VuxLS100
Ultra 330
Nano
100
Surveyor
360
Surveyor Vux
Ultra330
100360 25 (H)360330
100
200360 25 600
100
300 36024525 600 100
300 5 25 600
100
300 2.95
2.3 5 32 300 100 Teledyne
2.95
Velodyne
2.3 RIEGL Optech
5 2.4 VLP-32C Teledyne
2.95
VLP-16 55
Velodyne
2.3 RIEGLOptech
Teledyne
2.95
RIEGL
VLP-16 RIEGL
Velodyne
2.3 Optech
Teledyne
VLP-16 Optech
Velodyne VLP-16
Geodetics Geodetics
LiDAR SWISS
LiDARUSA LiDAR
LiDARUSAGeo-MMS
Geodetics
Geo-MMS
Snoopy
SWISS
LS
Geodetics
SCOUT-32
SCOUT-16
LiDAR
LiDAR LiDAR
miniVUX
LiDARUSA
Nano SCOUT-32
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS SCOUT-16
Geo-MMS
CL-360
Snoopy
SWISS
M8 LS LiDARLiDAR
SCOUT-16
Snoopy
LiDARminiVUX SCOUT-32
Snoopy
LiDARUSA
Nano SWISS
M8 LS100
200
Geo-MMS
SCOUT-32
Geo-MMS SCOUT-16
LiDAR
CL-360
775
330
miniVUX
200 LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Nano (V)40,
miniVUX
M8 LS200
(V)30,
CL-360
775
330
200 (H)360
100
200
LiDAR
330
Nano
360 M8 100
(V)40,
200
(V)30,
CL-360
775 (H)360
(V)40,3245360
(V)30,
330
200360 (V)40,
(V)30,
775
(H)360
200 (H)360
360 3245 400 700
300
310
100225 360 3 400 700
300600
310
100 23
700
5.5
300
10015
2
5 34 400 700
300 5.5
310
100 2.7
2.4
23
1.65
2.9
1.9515 5.5
2
5 5 400
600
310 2.7
2.4
2.915 RIEGL
2
Velodyne
23
Velodyne
5.5
1.655
miniVUX-1UAV
Quanergy
1.95 1.65 VLP-32
2.7
2.4
Velodyne
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.65
21Velodyne
2.9
miniVUX-1UAV
2.9 M8-Core
Quanergy
1.95
VLP-32
Velodyne
RIEGL
2.7
VLP-32C
Velodyne
VLP-16
Velodyne
VLP-32C
VLP-16
miniVUX-1UAV
M8-Core
Quanergy
1.95 RIEGL
VLP-32
VLP-32C
VLP-16 VLP-32
miniVUX-1UAV
M8-Core RIEGL
Quanergy M8-Core * * * *
 Drones 2020, 4,
Drones
x FOR2020,
PEER
Drones 4,
Drones
xREVIEW
2020, FOR
4, x2020,
PEER
FOR 4,PEER
xREVIEW
FOR PEER REVIEW
REVIEW 23 of 31 23 of23
31of 31 23 of 31
Drones 2020, 4,
Drones
x FOR2020,
PEER
Drones 4,
Drones
xREVIEW
2020, FOR
4, x2020,
PEER
FOR 4,PEER
xREVIEW
FOR PEER REVIEW
REVIEW 23 of 31 23 of23
31of 31 23 of 31
Drones 2020, 4, 046 21 of 28
Drones 2020, 4,
Drones
x FOR
2020,
PEER4,
Drones
xREVIEW
FOR2020,
PEER4,
Drones
xREVIEW
FOR2020,
PEER4, xREVIEW
FOR PEER REVIEW 23 of 31 23 of 31 23 of 31 23 of 31
Appendix Appendix
Ax FOR
Drones 2020, 4,
DronesAppendix
2020,
PEERAppendix
AxREVIEW
4,
Drones A2020,
FOR PEER AxREVIEW
4,
Drones
FOR2020,
PEER4, xREVIEW
FOR PEER REVIEW 23 of 31 23 of 31 23 of 31 23 of 31
AppendixAppendix
A Appendix Appendix
A A A
Drones 2020, 4,
Drones
x FOR2020,
PEER4,
Drones
xREVIEW
FOR 2020,
PEER4,PEER
xREVIEW
FOR PEER REVIEW Table Cont.
A1. payloads 23 of 31 23 of23
31of 31 23 of 31
A Drones 2020,
AppendixAppendix A 4, x FORAppendix
Appendix A REVIEW A Table A1. Integrated
Table A1.LiDAR
Table Integrated
Table
A1. A1.LiDAR
Integrated
Integrated forpayloads
LiDAR UAS.
LiDAR forpayloads
payloads UAS.
for UAS. for UAS.
Appendix
Drones Appendix
Ax FOR
2020, 4,
Drones 2020,
PEER
Drones Appendix
AxREVIEW
4,
Drones
2020, FOR
4, x2020,
PEER
FOR Appendix
A
4, xREVIEW
PEERFOR PEERAREVIEW
REVIEW Table A1. Integrated
Table A1.LiDAR
Table Integrated
Table
A1. payloads
A1.LiDAR
Integrated
Integrated forpayloads
LiDAR UAS.
23 LiDAR
of 31 for
payloads payloads
UAS.
for
23 UAS.
of23
31of for
31 UAS.
23 of 31
Max. Range
Max. RangeMax.Max. Range Max. Range
Range Max. Shots/sec
Max. Shots/s
Max. Max. Accuracy
(1000)
Shots/sec
Max.Accuracy
(1000)
Shots/sec Weight
Shots/sec
(1000)Accuracy
Weight
(1000)
Accuracy Accuracy
Weight
Weight Weight
Brand Brand Model
Brand
BrandModelBrand Model Model Model FOV FOV(deg)
(deg)
TableFOV (deg)
A1.FOV FOV
(deg)
Integrated
Table (deg)
A1.LiDAR
Integrated
Table**payloads
A1.LiDAR
Integrated
Tableforpayloads
A1.
UAS.
LiDAR
Integrated
forpayloads
UAS.
LiDAR LiDARLiDARSensor
forpayloads
UAS. Sensor
forLiDARLiDAR
UAS. GNSS
Sensor
LiDAR
Sensor IMUGNSS Storage
IMUStorageCamera
GNSS
Sensor
IMUIMU
GNSS IMUCamera
StorageCamera
StorageCamera
StorageCamera
Appendix
Drones Appendix
Ax FOR
2020, 4,
Drones 2020,
PEERAppendix
AxREVIEW
4,
Drones
FOR (m)
AxREVIEW
Max. (m)
4,Range
FORMax.(m) (m)
Range (m)
Max. RangeReturns
Returns
Max. (1000)
Returns
**
Returns
Shots/sec
Max. (1000)(cm)
Returns
**
Shots/sec
Max. (cm)
**
Accuracy
(1000) (kg)
Shots/sec** (cm)
(kg)
31 Accuracy
Weight(cm)
(1000) (cm)
(kg)
31 Accuracy
Weightof(kg) (kg)
31 Weight
Brand
Appendix
Brand
A2020,
Model
PEER4,
Drones
Brand Model
FOR2020,
PEER xREVIEW
PEER REVIEW
Max. Range Max. 23
Shots/sec of(1000) 23 of
Accuracy 23Weight 23 of 31
Brand Model Model FOV (deg) TableFOV (deg)
A1.FOV
Integrated
Table FOV
(deg) (deg)
A1.LiDAR
Integrated
Table payloads A1.LiDAR
Integrated
Table forpayloads
A1. UAS.
LiDAR
Integratedforpayloads UAS.
LiDAR LiDAR UAS. Sensor
forpayloads forLiDARUAS. GNSS
Sensor
LiDAR LiDAR
IMUStorageCamera
Sensor GNSS
Sensor IMUIMU
GNSS StorageCamera
GNSS IMUStorageCamera
StorageCamera
Polyscanner Scanfly
LM16HD2 Scanfly100 Max.
HD2
Scanfly HD2 (m)
Range
Scanfly
120 Max.
HD2 (m)
Range
(V)40,
120
(V)30, (m) Max.
(H)360
(H)360
120 (m)
(V)40,
120Returns
Range
Max.
(H)360
(V)40, 2Max. (V)40,
2(H)360 Returns
Range
Shots/sec
Max.
(H)360 **2 (1000)
2Returns
300
300 Returns
Shots/sec
Max. ** (cm)
Accuracy
2 3300 (1000)
300 5**
Shots/sec
Max. **Weight
300
2.3 (cm)
(kg)
Accuracy
(1000)
1.95 (cm)
5Shots/sec (cm)
(kg)
Accuracy
Weight
Velodyne
531Velodyne 1.95 5 (kg)
(1000) Puck (kg)
Accuracy
Weight
Velodyne
VLP-16
1.95 1.95 32MRPuck
Velodyne Weight
Velodyne
32MR
Puck Puck 32MR *
32MR * *IMUStorageCamera
*
Appendix
Drones
Brand
Drones Appendix
Ax FOR
2020,2020,
4,
Drones
4, x2020,
DronesPEER
Appendix
BrandFOR Appendix
A
4,
2020,xREVIEW
PEERFOR
Model4, PEERA
AxREVIEW
Brand
FOR REVIEW
Model
Brand
PEER Model
REVIEW FOVModel (deg) FOV (deg) FOV (deg) FOV (deg) 23 of23 31of 31 23 of23 of 31 LiDAR Sensor LiDAR GNSS Sensor
LiDAR
IMUStorageCamera
GNSS
Sensor
LiDAR
IMUStorageCamera
GNSS
SensorIMUStorageCamera
GNSS
Polyscanner Scanfly
LM32 HD2 Scanfly Max.
HD2
200
Scanfly (m)
Range
Scanfly
120
HD2 Max.
HD2 (m)
Range
(V)40,
120
(V)40, Table
Max.
(H)360
(H)360
120 (m)
(V)40,
120Returns
A1.
RangeIntegrated
Table
Max.
(H)360
(V)40, 22Max. (m)
(V)40,
Table
2(H)360 Returns
A1. LiDAR
Integrated
RangeTable
Shots/sec
Max.
(H)360
A1. 22600 **
300
Integrated Returns
22 payloads
A1. LiDAR
Integrated
(1000)
Shots/sec
Max. **for
22 3300 (cm)
LiDARpayloads
Accuracy
(1000)
300 Returns
UAS.
LiDAR
55Shots/sec
Max. **for
300
payloads
2.3 (cm)
(kg)
payloads
Accuracy
Weight
(1000)
1.95 UAS.
55Shots/sec
for UAS. **
Velodyne
5531 (cm)
for(kg)
Accuracy
Weight 55UAS.
(1000)
Velodyne
1.95 (cm)
(kg)
Accuracy
VLP-32C
1.95 Weight
Puck
Velodyne
1.95 32MR
Velodyne (kg)
Weight
Puck
Velodyne
32MR
Puck Puck
32MR 32MR * *
PolyExplore
3DBrand
DronesTarget x3D
2020,2020,
4,
Drones
FOR Target
3D Scanfly
2020, 3D
Target
PEER4, x Target
LITE
REVIEW
FOR Scanfly
PEER LITE
Scanfly
REVIEW Scanfly
100
LITE LITE (V)30,
100 (H)360
100 (V)30,
100 (H)360
(V)30, (V)30,
(H)360 (H)360 300 300 300
23 of 31 300 1.6
23 of Velodyne
1.6 1.6 Puck
Velodyne
1.6 Lite Puck
Velodyne Velodyne
Lite
Puck Puck
Lite Lite * * * **
Drones
Appendix A BrandScanfly
4,
Drones
Appendix x FOR Model
2020,
PEER Brand Appendix
4,
Appendix
A x
REVIEW
HD2
FOR Model
PEER
A
Scanfly
Brand A
REVIEW
HD2
Model FOV
(m)
Scanfly
120 HD2
Model
(m)
(V)40,
Scanfly
120
(deg) FOV (deg) FOV (deg) FOV (deg)
(H)360
HD2 (m)
(V)40,
120Returns
(H)360 22 2(H)360 (m)
(V)40,
120Returns
(H)36022300 **
300
(V)40, Returns
(H)360 ** (cm)
22 3300
23
Returns
55UAS.
of
22.3
31
** (cm)
300 (kg)
1.95 55UAS.
23 of
**
300
31 LiDAR Sensor
(cm)
(kg)
Velodyne
1.95 55UAS.
LiDAR GNSS
(cm)
Puck (kg)
Velodyne
1.95
532MR
Sensor
Puck
LiDAR
(kg)
Velodyne
1.95
IMUStorageCamera
32MR
GNSS
Sensor
Puck
LiDAR
IMUStorageCamera
Velodyne
32MR
GNSS
SensorIMUStorageCamera
Puck
GNSS*IMUStorageCamera
3D TargetPolyscanner
3D Target
3D LM16C
Scanfly
Scanfly 3DULTRA
Target Target
LITE Scanfly
Scanfly
100
LITE
Scanfly
Max.
ULTRA Scanfly
100
LITE
Range
Scanfly
(V)30,
LITE (V)30,
Max.
ULTRA 100 (H)360
Range
Max.
(V)40, (H)360
Table
100 (V)30,
Max.
Range
(H)360 100
A1. (H)360
Range
(V)40, Integrated
Table
(V)30,
Max.
(H)360 2 (V)30,
TableA1.
(V)40, (H)360
LiDAR
Integrated
Table
Shots/sec
Max.
A1.
(H)360 2 300
Integrated
Max.
600 2 payloads
A1. LiDAR
(1000)
Shots/sec
Max. 300
Integrated for
payloads
300
Accuracy
LiDAR
Shots/sec
2 600 (1000)5 LiDAR
Shots/sec 300
payloads
(1000) for 1.6
payloads
Accuracy
600 Weight
(1000)
0.95 5 for
Accuracy 5 Velodyne
UAS. Velodyne
for 1.6
Accuracy
Weight
Velodyne
0.95 5
VLP-16
1.6
Weight Puck
Velodyne
1.6
Weight
Ultra
Velodyne
0.95 Lite Puck
Velodyne
Puck Velodyne
Ultra Lite
Puck
Velodyne
Puck Puck
Lite
Ultra Lite
Puck * 32MR ** *
* *** *
Drones 2020, 4,
Brand Drones
x FOR 2020,
DronesPEER4,
Drones
xREVIEW
2020, FOR
4, x2020,
PEER
FOR Scanfly
4,PEER
xREVIEW
FOR ULTRA
PEER
REVIEW REVIEW FOV (deg) FOV (V)40, (H)360 2 600
23 of 31 23 of23 531of 31 LiDAR
23 of0.95 31 Sensor Velodyne Ultra Puck * StorageCamera * *
Appendix A3DBrand
Polyscanner
3DAppendix
Target Appendix Brand
Appendix
ATarget
Model
Scanfly
LM32C
A
Scanfly
Scanfly
Brand
HD2
ATarget
3DULTRA
LITE
Model
Scanfly
Scanfly
Scanfly 3D Model
HD2
200
Target
LITE
ULTRA
Model
Scanfly
120
Scanfly
100
(m)
Scanfly
HD2
LITE
ULTRA
(V)40,
Scanfly
120
(V)40,
(V)30,
Scanfly
100
(m)
(V)40,
(H)360
HD2
(H)360
(H)360
(m)LITE
(H)360
(V)40,
120
(V)30,
100
(m)
(V)40,
(deg)
FOV
(H)360
(H)360
Returns
(H)360
22 2(deg)
2
FOV
(V)40,
120
(V)30,
100
(V)40,
(deg)
(H)360
(H)360
Returns
(H)360
22600
2
300
(V)40,
300
(V)30,
**
Returns
600
(H)360
22 3300
(H)360
Returns 2 300
**
600 (cm) 5
55
**
222.3
300
300
**
600
1.95
1.6
(cm)
(kg)
0.95 5
55
(cm)
300
Velodyne
Velodyne
300 1.95
Velodyne
1.6
(cm)
(kg)
Velodyne
0.95
55 VLP-32C
5 (kg)
Puck
Puck
LiDAR
Velodyne
1.95
5532MR
Velodyne
Ultra 1.6
(kg)
Velodyne
0.95 Lite
Puck
GNSS
Sensor
LiDAR
Puck
Puck
LiDAR
Velodyne
1.95IMU
Sensor
32MR
Velodyne
Ultra 1.6
Lite
Velodyne
Puck
StorageCamera
GNSS
Sensor
Puck
Puck
IMUIMU
GNSS
Velodyne
32MR
Velodyne
Ultra Lite
Puck
StorageCamera
GNSS
Puck
** 32MR
Puck
IMUStorageCamera
Lite ** ** **
Hovermap HF1 Scanfly
Hovermap
Hovermap ULTRA
HF1
Hovermap
Max. 100
HF1
RangeMax. HF1 100 360
Range
Max. 100 Max.100
Table
Range (V)40,
360
A1.
RangeIntegrated
Table
Max. 2360 (H)360 360
A1. LiDAR
Integrated
Table
Shots/sec
Max. 2 300
Max. 22 payloads
A1. LiDAR 2 300
Integrated
(1000)Table
Shots/sec
Max. 600
forpayloads
A1.
300
Accuracy
Shots/sec (1000) 3Shots/sec
UAS.
LiDAR 300
Integrated
(1000) for 1.8
payloads
Accuracy
Weight
(1000) 3Accuracy
UAS.
LiDAR 53 Accuracy
Velodyne
for 1.8 3UAS.
payloads
Weight 0.95
1.8VLP-16
Weight Velodyne
for 1.8
Weight Velodyne
UAS.LiteVLP-16
Velodyne Ultra
Velodyne
VLP-16 Puck
LiteVLP-16
Lite Lite * * * *
Appendix
Emesent
3D Appendix
Brand
Target Appendix
A
Drones 2020, 4, Emesent
3D
DronesAppendix
A
Brand
x Drones
FOR Brand
2020,
PEER A
Emesent
Target
Scanfly
4, Emesent
Model
3D
Drones A
Brand
Target
LITE
xHD2
xREVIEW
FOR 2020,
PEER Model
Scanfly3D Target
LITE
Model
HD2 Model
Scanfly
100
120 LITE
HD2 FOV
(V)30,
Scanfly
100
(V)40,
120 (deg)
(H)360
LITE FOV
(V)30,
100
(V)40,
120 (deg)
(H)360
FOV 2 FOV
(V)30,
(deg)100
(V)40, (deg)
(H)360 2 300
(V)30, (H)360 2 300 5 2 300 1.6
1.95 5 300 LiDAR
Velodyne
1.6
Velodyne
1.95 5 Sensor
PuckLiDAR
Velodyne
31Puck 1.6
Velodyne
1.955 Lite
32MR GNSS
Sensor
Puck
LiDAR LiDAR
IMU
Velodyne
Puck 1.6
Lite
Sensor
Velodyne
32MR StorageCamera
GNSS
Sensor
Puck IMU
Velodyne
Puck Lite
GNSS
32MR StorageCamera
GNSS
Puck
IMU IMU
Lite StorageCamera
StorageCamera **
RedTail RTL-400
Scanfly
2020,
Hovermap 4,ULTRAVF14,
Scanfly
FOR
HF1 xREVIEW
PEER
Hovermap FOR
120
Scanfly
ULTRAPEER
REVIEW
Hovermap HF1HD2
Scanfly
Hovermap
VF1 100
(m) REVIEW
HF1
VF1 ULTRA(V)40,
Scanfly
HF1
VF1 100360
(m) (H)40
120
(H)360
ULTRA
100
(m) (V)40,
100
(m) (H)360
360
Returns 22360 5(H)360 (H)360
360
Returns 200
22Returns
600
(V)40,
300
** 22 Returns
(H)360221.5
600
300 23
300
** (cm)
300 53** of 3122.1
600
300 23
0.95
1.8
** (cm)
(kg) 53 of 23
(cm) 5331of600 23
Velodyne
0.95
31(cm)
Velodyne
1.8
(kg) of1.95
53OEM Ultra
Velodyne
0.95
1.8VLP-16
(kg) Velodyne
1.8
(kg) Velodyne
5Velodyne
Puck Puck
Ultra
Velodyne
LiteVLP-160.95
Puck
Velodyne
VLP-16 32MR
Lite Ultra
Velodyne
VLP-16
Lite Puck
Lite Ultra
* Puck * * *
Emesent Emesent
Emesent Emesent Max. Range Max. Range Table
Max. A1.
Range
Table Integrated
Table
Max.
A1. Max. A1.
Integrated
Table LiDAR
Integrated
Range
Shots/sec
Max.
A1.LiDAR Integrated payloads
LiDAR
(1000)
Shots/sec
Max.
payloads forpayloads
Accuracy
LiDAR (1000) UAS.
Shots/sec
Max.
for
payloads
UAS. for
Accuracy
Weight
(1000) UAS.
Shots/sec
for UAS.Accuracy
Weight
(1000) Accuracy
Weight Weight
Appendix
Drones
3D
Routescene Brand
Target
GeoCue Appendix
A
2020, 4,
Drones
x3D
FOR 2020,
Drones
Brand PEER
Appendix
Target
GeoCue
3D Appendix
A
4,
Drones
Scanfly
2020,xREVIEW
Scanfly
Hovermap
GeoCue
LidarPod
FOR
4,
Model
3D Ax 2020,
ULTRA
Brand PEER
FOR
Target
LITE
GeoCue A
4,
Scanfly xREVIEW
PEER
Scanfly
HF1
Hovermap
VF1
Target HD2 Hovermap
FOR
ULTRA
Model PEER
Scanfly
REVIEW
Brand
LITE
Scanfly
100
REVIEW
Model
Scanfly
HF1
VF1
HD2LITE 100
Hovermap
120 ULTRA
LITE
VF1 HD2 Scanfly
(V)40,
FOVModel
(V)30,
HF1
VF1 100
Hovermap
(V)40, (H)360
360ULTRA
(deg)
100
120(H)360
(V)40, (H)360 (V)40,
FOV
(V)30,
HF1 100 (H)360
360(deg)
(V)30,
(V)40,
120 (H)360 2 2 (V)40,
FOV
(V)30,
100
2 (V)40,
360 (H)360
(deg)
360
(H)360 2 2 600
(V)40,
300
700 FOV (H)360
(deg)
360 22 600
300
6**for
23 5 3 of 31
5 Returns22 600
300
1.3**for
23
0.95
1.6
1.8
1.95 5 3 of2331
5 53Velodyne 600
of
300 23
Velodyne
31 0.95
LiDAR
Velodyne
1.6
Velodyne
1.8
1.95 53 of 31Ultra
1.6
5 VLP-32E Velodyne
Puck0.95
Sensor 5
LiDAR
Velodyne
VLP-16
1.8Puck 1.6
Velodyne
1.8
1.953 Puck
Lite
32MRLite
Velodyne Ultra
Velodyne
GNSS
Puck 0.95
Sensor Puck
LiDAR
IMU
Velodyne
Velodyne
VLP-16
Velodyne Lite
1.8
Puck
PuckVLP-16
32MRLite Ultra
Velodyne
Puck Puck
StorageCamera
GNSS
Sensor
LiDAR
IMU
Lite
Velodyne
VLP-16
Lite
Puck Lite
Lite 32MR * Ultra
StorageCamera
GNSS
Sensor
VLP-16
* Puck
IMU
Lite StorageCamera
GNSS
* IMU StorageCamera
* *
HD2
(m) (m) 120
Table (V)40,
(m)Returns
A1. 3 (H)360
Integrated
Table (m)Returns
A1. LiDAR
Integrated ** 2 Returns 300
(cm) (cm)
(kg) 32 1.95
**Quanergy
(cm)
(kg) (cm)
(kg) Puck
(kg) 32MR * * *
Emesent Emesent True View 410
True
Emesent 3DIS
View
True 410
True
Emesent
View
Max.3DIS
200
View
410
Max.3DIS
Range 410 (V)20,
Max.
Range
3DIS
200
Range
Max.
(H)360
200
Range
Table
(V)20,
200 A1.
(H)360
(V)20,
Max.
Integrated
Table
(V)20,
(H)360
Max.
A1.
(H)360
3 430
Shots/sec
Max.
Shots/sec
LiDAR
Max. 3 payloads
Integrated LiDAR
payloads
(1000) 3 430
Shots/sec
(1000)
LiDARpayloads
3UAS.
430
Accuracy
Shots/sec (1000)
forpayloads
UAS.
Accuracy
(1000)
430
Accuracy3UAS.
Weight 2for3UAS.
Accuracy
Weight Weight 2 M8-Ultra
Weight
Quanergy 2QuanergyM8-Ultra
Quanergy
M8-Ultra M8-Ultra
Group
GeoCue
Drones 2020, 4,
Drones
x Group
GeoCue
FOR Hovermap
Group
2020,
Drones PEER4,
Drones
GeoCue
2020,
Scanflyx Group
GeoCue
REVIEW
FOR HF1
Hovermap
VF1
2020,
4,ULTRAPEER
xTarget
FOR 4, x
PEER
Scanfly REVIEW
FOR HF1
Hovermap
VF1
PEER
REVIEW
ULTRA 100
Scanfly REVIEW
ULTRAHF1
Hovermap
VF1 100
(V)40, 360 HF1
(H)360VF1 100
(V)40,360
(H)360 2
2 2(H)360 100
(V)40, 360
(H)360 2
2600 300
600 360 2 300
22.5
600 23 3 of 312 300 1.8
23 3 of
23 31 300
Velodyne
1.8
23
of Velodyne
31 3 of 31 Velodyne
VLP-161.83 Lite Velodyne
VLP-16 1.8 Lite Velodyne
VLP-16 Lite VLP-16 Lite
3D Brand
Target
Appendix
ScanViz Brand
Emesent A3D Brand
Appendix Target
3DBrand
SV-Mini
True
Emesent
Appendix Model
Scanfly
3D
Target
Appendix
A
View LITE
Model
HD2
410
True
Emesent
A 3DISAModel
Scanfly
Scanfly
View
True LITE
Model
Scanfly
HD2
200
410
True
Emesent
View ULTRA
Scanfly
100
LITE
120
3DIS
200
View
410 3DISLITE
HD2
410 FOV
(V)30,
100
(V)40,
Scanfly
120
(V)40,
(V)20,
3DIS
200 (deg)
FOV
100
(H)360
HD2
(H)360
200
Table
FOV
(V)30,
100
(deg)
(V)40,
120
(V)20,
200 (deg)
(V)40,
FOV
(V)30,
(H)360
(V)20,
A1. 32
Integrated
Table
(V)30,
(deg)
(V)40,
120
(V)20,
(H)360A1. (H)360
LiDAR32
Integrated
Table 300
(V)40,
430 32 (1000) (H)360
32 300
430 355**
600
300
430
600
21.4
300
430 0.95
355UAS.
1.6
1.95 2for 35Velodyne
300 0.95
3552 VLP-32C
LiDAR
Velodyne
1.6
Velodyne
1.95
Quanergy 0.95Ultra
LiDAR
1.6 Velodyne
Puck
2 Puck
0.95
Sensor
LiDAR
Velodyne
1.6
Velodyne
1.95
M8-Ultra
Quanergy 2Puck
Velodyne
Lite
5Sensor
32MR Ultra
Velodyne
GNSS
Sensor
Puck
LiDAR
Velodyne
Puck
Quanergy
Puck
Velodyne
1.95IMU
Ultra
Velodyne
Lite
GNSS
Sensor
Puck
32MR
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
M8-Ultra
Ultra
Puck
IMU
Lite
Puck Puck
StorageCamera
GNSS
Puck IMUIMU
Lite
Velodyne
32MR
M8-Ultra StorageCamera
Puck** StorageCamera
StorageCamera
GNSS 32MR ** * ** *
Group
GeoCue
Brand
Brand
Geo-MMS
Group
GeoCue
Brand Group
Hovermap LiDAR
Model
Hovermap
Brand
Geo-MMS
Group
GeoCue HF1
M8
Geo-MMS
VF1
Hovermap
Model
Hovermap
Model
Max.
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
GeoCueHF1
(m)
Max.
150
LiDAR
VF1 M8
Hovermap
100
Hovermap
Model 100
(m)
RangeM8 Max.
Range
LiDARVF1 (m)
Range
Max.
(V)20,
150
M8
Hovermap
HF1 100
FOV
100
(m)
Range
(H)360
150
360
360(deg)
FOV
(V)20,
VF1 150
FOV
Returns
Max.
(V)20,
100
100
(deg) 360
360
32Returns
(H)360
(deg)
FOV 2
Table
Max.
(V)20,
(H)360
(deg)100Returns
360
360
A1.
32Returns
Shots/sec
Max.
Shots/sec
(H)360
2
**
Max.
430
300
300 3 payloads
Integrated A1.
** LiDAR
Integrated
Shots/sec
(1000)
360 2
**for
Shots/sec
32 430 300
300
payloads
(cm)
LiDAR
Accuracy
(1000)
430 3
UAS.
3Accuracy LiDAR
payloads
(cm)
(1000)
2 430
300
300
for
payloads
(cm)
(kg)
Accuracy
Weight
3Accuracy
1.8
1.8 3
(cm)
Weight 3UAS.
(kg) 300 for 3UAS.
(kg)
Weight
Quanergy
Velodyne
1.8
LiDAR
Velodyne
1.8 3
(kg)
Weight M8-Core
Quanergy
VLP-16
Velodyne
VLP-16
LiDAR 1.8
Sensor
Velodyne
1.83Sensor
LiDAR Quanergy
Lite
Lite
M8-Core
Quanergy
VLP-16
GNSS
Sensor
VLP-16 M8-Core
Velodyne
1.8
Velodyne
LiDAR GNSS Lite
IMU
Lite
Sensor
M8-Core
VLP-16
Velodyne
GNSS
VLP-16
IMU Lite
StorageCamera
IMU
Lite VLP-16
StorageCamera
StorageCamera
GNSS IMU Lite
StorageCamera
Appendix
3D
DronesTarget
2020, Appendix
A
4,
Drones
x FOR True
Appendix
3D 2020,
Drones PEER
SZT-V100
Appendix
A
View
Scanfly
Target
Scanfly
4, 3D
Drones
2020,x A 410
True
ULTRA
REVIEW
FOR
4, x 3DIS
2020,
HD2PEER
FOR A
Hovermap
View
Scanfly
Target
LITE 4, x
PEER 410
True
ULTRA
Scanfly
Scanfly3D LITE
REVIEW
FORHD2 3DISHF1
200
View
Scanfly
ULTRA
Target
Scanfly
PEER
REVIEW
100 100
(m)
120 410
True
ULTRA
LITE
REVIEW
(m) (V)20,
3DIS
200
View
(V)40,
(V)30,
Scanfly
100
(m)
(V)40,
120
(V)30,
100
(H)360
(m)410
LITE
(H)360
(H)360
(V)20,
3DIS
200
(V)40,
(V)30,
100
(V)40, (H)360
(V)40,
Returns
(H)36032
360
2Returns
2
(V)20,
200
(V)40,
(H)360
(V)30,
100 (H)360
3
(H)360
Returns 2 430
(V)20,
2Returns
600
(V)30,
**
300
300 22
** (H)360
3
(H)360 430
2 3600
**
300
300
(cm)3
600
23 55** of
(cm)3
312 430
600
300
1.5
3
0.95
1.6
(cm)
(kg)
23
1.95 2
55 of (cm)
23 (kg) 5331 430
300
of Quanergy
3
Velodyne
0.95
Velodyne
1.6
(kg)
23
Velodyne
31
Velodyne1.95 2 1.8
5 of(kg)
0.95
31 M8-Ultra
Quanergy
Ultra
Puck 3
Velodyne
0.95
Velodyne
Puck 1.6
Velodyne
VLP-16 5Velodyne
2Puck
Velodyne
Lite
32MR PuckVLP-16
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
Ultra 2
Velodyne
Puck
Ultra
Velodyne
Puck 1.6
Lite
32MR
Lite
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
Ultra
Puck
Puck Puck
Velodyne
Lite M8-Ultra
Puck* Lite * * * *
Emesent
Group
GeoCue Emesent
Geo-MMS
Group
GeoCueEmesent
Geo-MMS Emesent
Scanfly
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Group
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
GeoCue HD2M8
VLP-16
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS Scanfly
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Group
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
GeoCue
LiDAR
Max. HD2
150
M8
VLP-16
100
LiDAR 120
LiDAR
LiDAR
M8
VLP-16
Range (V)20,
Max. 150
M8(V)40,
VLP-16
100 120
360
Range150
100 (H)360
Max. (V)40,
(V)20,
150
100360
(V)20,
Range
Max.32360 2 Shots/sec
(V)20,
(H)360 (H)360
360
Max.32 430 300 32 2 (1000)
300 32 430
Shots/sec
Max. 300 300
35Shots/sec
430
300
Accuracy
(1000) 5 430300 35Accuracy
1.59
Accuracy
Weight
(1000) 1.95
355 Accuracy 35Velodyne
Quanergy
Velodyne
1.59
Weight 1.95 M8-Core
1.59 Puck
Quanergy
VLP-16 Velodyne
Velodyne
1.59
Weight 32MR
Quanergy
Velodyne Puck
M8-Core
Quanergy
VLP-16
Velodyne 32MR
M8-Core
VLP-16 M8-Core
VLP-16 * *
Hovermap
True View 410VF1
TrueHovermap
3DIS Hovermap
View 410VF1
Hovermap
True 100
3DISVF1
200
View 410 VF1
True Max.
100
(V)20,
3DIS
200
View 360 Range
Table
100
(H)360 A1.
100
410(V)40,
(V)20,
3DIS
200360Integrated
Table
(H)360322360 360 TableA1.
(V)20,
200 LiDAR
Integrated
360Table
A1. 322 430
(H)360 Max.
300
Integrated
(V)20, Shots/sec
2 payloads
A1. LiDAR
Integrated
(H)360 430forpayloads
322 LiDAR
300 33UAS.
300 (1000)
LiDAR
payloads300
3 430 for
payloads
33UAS.
1.8 for
2 UAS. 3 430 for
Velodyne
1.8
Quanergy 2Weight
33UAS. 1.8VLP-16
Velodyne
1.8
M8-Ultra
Quanergy 2 Lite
Velodyne
3Velodyne VLP-16
Velodyne
VLP-16
M8-Ultra
QuanergyLite
2IMU VLP-16
Lite Lite
M8-Ultra
Quanergy M8-Ultra
South Brand Appendix
Appendix A Brand Brand
Appendix
SZT-V200 Model
Hovermap
Scanfly Brand
Appendix
A
Scanfly A HD2
Scanfly
ULTRAHF1HD2A
ScanflyModel
Hovermap Model
Hovermap
Scanfly HD2
200
Scanfly
ULTRAHF1HD2Model
Hovermap
100
HF1
120
Scanfly 120 HF1FOV
100
(V)40,
120
(V)40,
ULTRAScanfly 360(deg)
100
(H)360
(H)360
(V)40,
120
ULTRA FOV
100
(H)360 360(deg)
FOV
(H)360
(V)40, 2 FOV
(deg)
(H)360
2
(V)40, (deg)
360
(H)360 300
600
600
(V)40, 2 300 (H)3602 300
3
600 300 5 5 2 300
1.6
600 1.8
1.95
0.95 5 1.95 53 Velodyne
600 LiDAR
Velodyne
1.8
1.95
Velodyne
0.95 5 1.8
Velodyne
1.95 Sensor
Puck
VLP-32 LiDAR
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.8
Puck
Ultra
Velodyne
0.95
5 32MRLite
Puck GNSS
Sensor
LiDAR
VLP-16
Puck
32MR LiDAR
Sensor
Velodyne
VLP-16
32MR
Puck
Ultra
Velodyne
0.95 Lite
Puck StorageCamera
GNSS
Sensor
VLP-16
Lite
32MR
Ultra IMU
GNSS
Lite
Velodyne
Puck StorageCamera
GNSS
IMU
Ultra IMUStorageCamera
StorageCamera
Puck
3DGroup
Target
3D Target
Emesent 3D Geo-MMS
GroupGeo-MMS
Geo-MMS
Target
3D
Emesent Scanfly
Target LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Group
LiDAR LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
LITE
Scanfly
Emesent M8
VLP-16
Scanfly LiDAR
Geo-MMS
LITE Geo-MMS
Group
LiDARLiDAR
LITE
Scanfly 150
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS M8
VLP-16
100
(m)
LiDAR
LITE LiDAR
Geo-MMS
LiDAR
VLP-16
100 (V)20,
LiDAR 150
M8
VLP-16
100
(m)
(V)30, 360LiDAR
(H)360
100
(m)
(V)30, (V)20,
150
M8
100
(m)
(V)30,
(H)360 360 32360
Returns
(H)360
(V)30, (V)20,
2 150
(H)360 36032Returns
Returns 430
(V)20,
300
** 2 A1. 3 430
Returns
300 300
**for 3** 53 430
(cm)
300 300
**for 3 (cm)
1.59
(cm)
(kg)
1.6 1.65 430 Quanergy
3 Velodyne
Velodyne
1.59
(cm)
(kg)
Velodyne
1.6 M8-Core
Quanergy
1.6 Puck
1.59
(kg) 3Puck
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.59
(kg)
Velodyne Lite M8-Core
Quanergy
VLP-16
Velodyne
Puck
Velodyne
Velodyne
Lite M8-Core
Quanergy M8-Core
VLP-16
Lite Lite
VLP-16
Puck ** ** ** ** * *
GeoCue GeoCueEmesent
GeoCue GeoCue 100 (V)40,
100 Table
(H)360
100 A1.
(V)40,
100 Integrated
Table
(H)360
(V)40, 22 (H)360 A1.
(V)40,
Table LiDAR
Integrated
Table
(H)360
A1. 22 700 22 payloads
Integrated LiDAR
Integrated
22 LiDAR
700 payloads
6UAS.
700 LiDAR
payloads700 payloads
6UAS. for UAS. 6 Accuracy for 6UAS.
Velodyne VLP-32E
Velodyne VLP-32E
VelodyneVelodyne
VLP-32E VLP-32E
3D Target 3D Hovermap
True
Geo-MMS View
VLP-32E
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
Target LiDAR
Scanfly
Hovermap 410VF1
True
LiDAR Hovermap
3DIS
Geo-MMS
LiDAR View
VLP-32E
True
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
LITE M8
VLP-16
Scanfly
HF1
Hovermap 410
LiDAR VF1
Hovermap
Max.
Hovermap
True
View
LiDAR
LiDAR 100
3DIS
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
VLP-32E
Geo-MMS LITE
HF1 Range
VF1
200
View
VLP-32E
410
150
M83DIS
VLP-16
100
Hovermap 410
LiDAR
LiDAR
LiDAR VF1
Max.
Geo-MMS
LiDAR
Geo-MMS 100
3DIS
200
Max.
(V)20,
150
M8
VLP-16
100
(V)30,
HF1
Hovermap 360
Range100 Max.
Range
200
(H)360
LiDAR
LiDAR
360 100
200
(V)20,
150
M8360
Range
VLP-16
100
(V)30,
HF1 Max.
(V)20,
(H)360
360 32 360(H)360
(V)20,
150
100360
Shots/sec
Max.
(H)360
360 32 300
Max.
430
(V)20,
300 32 (1000)
Shots/sec
Max.
(H)360
360 32 300
Shots/sec
430
300 3553Shots/sec
Accuracy
(1000)
300
430 (1000) 300
322.1
430
300 1.8
35532 1.6
Accuracy
Weight
(1000)
Accuracy
1.59
1.6
1.8 35 430 Velodyne
300 1.8
35532Weight
RIEGL
Weight
Quanergy
Velodyne
1.59
Velodyne
1.6
Velodyne
1.8 2VLP-16
1.8 Velodyne
1.8
Weight
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
M8-Core
35Puck
VLP-16
Velodyne
Puck1.59
Velodyne
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.8 Lite
Velodyne
Lite
LiteVLP-16
Velodyne
2Quanergy VLP-16
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
M8-Core
VLP-16 Lite
M8-Ultra
Velodyne
Puck
VLP-161.59
VelodyneLite
1.8 LiteVLP-16
Lite
M8-CoreLite
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
VLP-16
Velodyne
VLP-16
VelodyneLite M8-Core
VLP-16
VLP-16 Lite
3D
Group Target
Geodetics
Brand 3D
SZT-R250
Geodetics
Brand
Group Target
Scanfly
Geodetics
Brand Scanfly
HD2
Geodetics
Model
Brand
ULTRA
Group
Scanfly LITE
Scanfly
ULTRA Scanfly
HD2
250
Model
ULTRA
Model
Scanfly LITE
Scanfly
120
HD2
ULTRA 100
Model HD2 (V)40,
120
FOV
(V)40,(V)30,
360 100
(H)360
120
(deg)
(H)360
(V)40, (H)360
FOV(V)30,
(V)40,
120
(V)40,
(H)360 (H)360
(V)40,
FOV(deg)
(H)360
(V)40, 22
2 (deg) 5 2
(V)40,
(H)360
FOV
(H)360 (H)360
(deg)
2 A1.LiDAR 22 300
100
600 300
2 A1.
600LiDAR 2 300
1.5
600 300
600 5 5
5 700300 1.95
0.95 5 0.95 1.95
LiDAR
Velodyne
0.95 Velodyne
1.6
1.95Puck 1.95
Sensor
UltraLiDAR
Velodyne Velodyne
32MR
Puck Lite
VelodynePuck
LiDARGNSS
Sensor
Ultra Puck
32MR
Puck
LiDAR
IMU
Puck
Sensor Lite
Puck
32MR 32MR
StorageCamera
GNSS
Sensor IMU
GNSSIMU StorageCamera
GNSS * IMU
*
* StorageCamera StorageCamera
* * *
Appendix
GeoCue Appendix
Emesent A Emesent
Appendix
GeoCue Appendix
GroupA A LiDAR
Emesent
GeoCue A Emesent 100
(m) (V)40,
100
(m) (H)360
100
Table(V)40,
100 (H)360
(V)40,
A1.
(m) Integrated
Table
Returns (V)40,
(H)360 (H)360
2 700
Integrated
Table
Returns **2 payloads 2 700
Integrated
Returns **for 6UAS.
700
payloads
(cm) LiDAR **for 6UAS.
payloads
(cm)
(kg) 65 miniVUX-1UAV
Velodyne
for
(cm)
(kg)
Velodyne
6UAS. 0.95 VLP-32E
Ultra
Velodyne
(kg)
Velodyne
Puck
Velodyne Ultra
VLP-32E
Velodyne
VLP-32EPuck
VLP-32E * * *
Geodetics
Brand
GeoCue
Geo-MMS
VLP-32E
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMSHovermap
True
Geodetics
Brand ViewLiDAR Geo-MMS
LiDAR
410VF1
True
Geodetics
Model
Brand
VLP-32E
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS VLP-16
Hovermap
3DIS
ViewLiDARMax.
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
LiDAR
VLP-32E
Model 410VF1 Range
VLP-32E
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS VLP-16
100
Hovermap
True 3DIS LiDAR
View
Model
Max.
LiDAR
LiDAR
410 VF1Max.
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS VLP-16
100
Hovermap
3DIS
FOV
(m)
Range Max.
Range
LiDAR
360 LiDAR
(deg)VF1 Range
VLP-16
100
FOV
Max.
360(deg) 2 Table 100 A1.
360 Returns
Shots/sec
Max. 2 Max.Integrated
300 (1000)
360 2 LiDAR
Shots/sec
Max.
Shots/sec
300 **
Accuracy
(1000) payloads
Shots/sec
(1000)
36553 5322 430
Accuracy
300 Weight
(1000)
Accuracy
1.59 for
(cm)
365532 0.95
1.8 UAS. Accuracy
300 Weight
Velodyne
1.59 (kg)VLP-16
2Weight
36553Velodyne
Velodyne
1.8
Quanergy
Weight
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.59
532Puck
Velodyne
1.8
M8-Ultra
Quanergy Lite VLP-16
Velodyne
VLP-161.59
Velodyne
1.8
M8-Ultra
QuanergyLite VLP-16
Velodyne
VLP-16
VelodyneLiteIMU
M8-Ultra VLP-16
VLP-16 Lite StorageCamera
3D Target 3D
Group 3D
Group
Scanfly
Geo-MMS
Geodetics
Brand
Target
Scanfly
3D ULTRA
LiDAR
Scanfly
Hovermap
Target
Hovermap
Group
Scanfly
Geo-MMS
Target
LITE True
ULTRA
HF1 M8
Scanfly ULTRA
View
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Model
Scanfly
Geo-MMS
Hovermap
HF1 LITE
Scanfly
Hovermap 410
150
ULTRA
LiDAR
HF1 M8
200
LITE 3DIS
Scanfly
100
HF1 LiDAR
LITE
M8
100 (V)20,
150
M8
(V)40,
200
(V)30,
100
(V)40, (H)360
(V)40,
150
200
360
(H)360
100 (V)20,
150
(V)40,
200
(V)30,
100
(H)360
360 (V)20,
(V)40,
(V)40,360 32
(H)360
FOV
(H)360
(V)30, 2 360 22FOV
(V)20,
(V)40,
(deg)
(V)30,
(H)360
(V)40,
100 (deg)
32
(H)360
(H)360
2 430
600
300
700
(V)40,32 600 300 32
(H)360
2 430
600
300 430
700 600
300 300 0.95
600
700 1.6
1.8 35 700
1.8 LiDAR
Velodyne
0.95
Velodyne
1.6
Velodyne
1.8
Velodyne Velodyne
0.95
1.6
1.8 Sensor
Ultra
2VLP-16LiDAR
Velodyne
M8-Core
VLP-32C
Puck
Velodyne
1.6
Ultra
Velodyne
VLP-32E
Velodyne
6
VLP-16 LiDAR
Lite
Velodyne
Velodyne GNSS
Sensor
Ultra
Quanergy
Puck
Puck
Velodyne
Lite LiDAR
M8-Core
VLP-32C IMU
Puck
M8-Ultra
Sensor
Velodyne
VLP-16
VLP-32ELite
Ultra
M8-Core
VLP-32C
Velodyne
Lite Puck
VLP-16Lite StorageCamera
GNSS
Sensor
Puck
Puck IMU
M8-Core
VLP-32C
GNSS
Lite
VLP-32E
LiteVelodyne
Lite StorageCamera
GNSS
VLP-32E
* IMU
StorageCamera
* * * *
Emesent
Emesent Group
VLP-32C
Scanfly
Geo-MMS
Surveyor
Emesent VLP-32E
Geo-MMS
Emesent HD2
LiDAR VLP-32C
Scanfly
Geo-MMS
LiDAR
Geo-MMS HD2
100LiDAR
Scanfly
Geo-MMS (m)
VLP-32C
Scanfly
120
Geo-MMS
VLP-32C
VLP-32E HD2
LiDAR VLP-32E
LiDAR
Geo-MMS HD2
LiDAR
LiDAR (m)
(V)40,
120
Geo-MMS 360 (m)
(H)360
VLP-32E
120 LiDAR (m)
(V)40,
120Returns
(H)360
(V)40, 2 2(H)360 (V)40, Returns
Returns
(H)3602300 **
300 2 (1000) Returns **
2 5300 (cm)
**
300 5 1.6**
300 (cm)
(kg)
1.95 5 (cm) 5 Velodyne (cm)
(kg)
Velodyne
1.95 5 (kg)
1.95 Puck (kg)
Velodyne
VLP-16 1.95 32MRPuck
Velodyne Velodyne
32MR
Puck Puck 32MR *
32MR * ** *
GeoCue
Geodetics GeoCue
Geodetics
Geo-MMSHovermap GeoCue
Geodetics
LiDAR
Geo-MMSHF1VLP-16
Hovermap
Geo-MMS GeoCue
LiDARMax.
Geodetics
Geo-MMS
HF1
LiDAR Range
200
VLP-16
100LiDAR Max.
VLP-16 Range
Max.
(V)40,
200
VLP-16
(V)40,
100 360
200
100 Max.
Range
(H)360
Table
(H)360 Range
(V)40,
200
A1.
(V)40,
100 Max.
(H)360
360
(V)40, 22360
Integrated
Table
(H)360
2 (V)40,
(H)360
Table
(V)40,Shots/sec
A1.
100 Max.
360
A1. 22 Max.
(H)360
LiDAR
Integrated
Table
(H)360
2 600
300
Integrated
700
(V)40, Shots/sec
Max.
22 payloads
A1. Shots/sec
(H)360
2 Accuracy
22 LiDAR
LiDAR 600
Integrated
300
700 (1000)
3553Shots/sec
forpayloads
600
300
6 (1000)
UAS.
LiDAR
payloads
2 Accuracy
600
300
700 Weight
for(1000)
Accuracy
3553UAS.
payloads
1.59
1.8
6 for 3553 430
UAS. Accuracy
700 Weight
Velodyne
for
Velodyne
1.59
Velodyne
1.8
Velodyne
6 Weight
355Velodyne
UAS.1.59 Weight
VLP-32C
Velodyne
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.59
VLP-16
Velodyne
VLP-32E
Velodyne Velodyne
Lite VLP-32C
Velodyne
6Velodyne Velodyne
VLP-16
Velodyne
VLP-16 VLP-32C
Lite
VLP-16
VLP-32E
Velodyne VLP-32C
VLP-16
VLP-32E
Velodyne VLP-32E
Brand Surveyor True
Brand
Geo-MMS
Brand Hovermap
View
Model
Scanfly 410
Brand
ULTRA
LiDAR
VLP-32C VF1
True 3DIS
Geo-MMS HF1
Hovermap
ScanflyVF1
View
Model
M8
Geo-MMS 410
ULTRA
LiDARVF1
True 3DIS
Geo-MMS
Model
Scanfly
VLP-32C HF1
VF1
200
View
150
ULTRA
LiDARM8 100
Model
Scanfly 410
True
ULTRA
LiDAR
M8
VLP-32C 3DIS
200
View
FOV
(V)40,
(V)20,
150
M8 360
410
(deg)
(H)360
150 3DIS
200
FOV
(V)40,
(V)20,
150 (deg)
(H)360
FOV
(V)40,
(V)20, 3 2 200
FOV
(V)40,
(V)20,
(deg)
(H)360 (deg)
(H)360
3 (V)20,
600
430 3 300 3 600
430 3
600
430 33 600
430 0.95
3 2 1.8
3 Quanergy
LiDAR
Velodyne
0.95
3
Teledyne 2 1.8
0.95 VLP-16
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
Ultra 3
Sensor
LiDAR
Velodyne
0.95
M8-Core
Optech
Teledyne2Puck
LiDAR
Velodyne LiteVLP-16
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
GNSS
Sensor
Ultra
Quanergy 2
LiDAR
VelodyneIMU
Puck
M8-Core
Sensor
Ultra
Optech
TeledyneTeledyne
M8-Core
Optech Lite
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
StorageCamera
GNSS
Sensor
Ultra IMU
Puck
M8-Core
Puck GNSS
Optech IMUM8-Ultra
StorageCamera
GNSS * IMU StorageCamera
StorageCamera* **
Emesent
3D
YellowScan Group
Emesent
Target 3DGroup
3D Scanfly
Geo-MMS
Emesent Ultra
VLP-32E
Emesent
Target
Scanfly
Target3D HD2
Group Scanfly
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Target
LITE Scanfly HD2
200
VLP-32E
Group
LITE
Scanfly Scanfly
LiDAR
Scanfly 120
Geo-MMS
VLP-32CHD2VLP-32E
(m)
Scanfly
100
LITE HD2
LITE (V)40,
LiDAR 120
Geo-MMS 360
(m)
(V)30,
100 (H)360
VLP-32E
120
(H)360
(m)
100 (V)40,
LiDAR 120
(m)
(V)30,
100 (H)360
(V)40,
Returns
(H)360
(V)30, 22 2(H)360(V)40,
(V)30,
(H)360 (H)360
Returns
(H)36022600
Returns 300
**
300 22 Returns 22 5300
**
300 300
(cm)
**
300 55 300
1.7**
300 1.95
(cm)
(kg)
1.6 55 (cm) 55 Velodyne Velodyne
1.95
(cm)
(kg)
Velodyne
1.6 55 (kg)
1.6 Puck
Velodyne
VLP-32
1.95 Puck1.95
(kg)
Velodyne
1.6 32MR
Velodyne
Lite
VelodynePuck
Velodyne
Puck 32MR
Puck
Velodyne
Lite
Puck Puck
32MRPuck
Lite 32MR
Lite * * * **
Geodetics Geo-MMS
Geodetics
Geo-MMS LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Geodetics
LiDARCL-360
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Geodetics
LiDAR
LiDARCL-360
775
200
Geo-MMS LiDAR
CL-360 CL-360
775
(V)40,
200 360
775
(H)360 775
(V)40,360
200360 4
22360
(H)360 (V)40, 360
200 (H)360 4
22 600 310
(V)40, 42 300 (H)360 4
2 600 310 3101
33 32 600 1.8 310 1
33 1.8 13 600 1
Velodyne
3Velodyne VLP-32C
Velodyne
3Velodyne VLP-32C
Velodyne VLP-32C
Velodyne VLP-32C * * * *
GeoCue
GeoCue GeoCue Hovermap
GeoCue
Geo-MMS Hovermap
HovermapLiDAR
Geo-MMS
VLP-32C
Geo-MMS
VF1
HF1
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Hovermap
VF1
Hovermap
VLP-16
Hovermap LiDAR
VLP-32C
Geo-MMSHovermap
VF1
Geo-MMS
HF1
Max.
LiDAR
LiDAR
100
VF1
VLP-16
Hovermap 100LiDAR
LiDAR
VLP-32C
Geo-MMSRange
100
HF1 HF1
Max.
VLP-16
LiDAR
100
VLP-16
Geo-MMS
360
100
360
VLP-32C
Range
(V)40,
100
Max. 100 360
Max.
(H)360 360
Range
(V)40,
LiDAR
Range 100 Max.
(H)360
(V)40, 2 360
360 2
(V)40,
(H)360 360
Shots/sec
Max.
(H)360
2 300
300
700
Max. 2 (1000)
Shots/sec
Max.
2 300
300 300
Accuracy
700
Shots/sec 5
(1000)
300
6
700 3Shots/sec
(1000) 300 1.59
1.8
Accuracy
700 Weight 5
(1000)
6
Accuracy3 5 3
Velodyne
1.8
Velodyne
1.59 5
Teledyne
Velodyne
1.8
RIEGL
Accuracy
Weight
Velodyne
6 3 1.8
1.59
1.8
Weight
VLP-16
CL-360Velodyne
VLP-16
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.59
Optech
Teledyne
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.8
Weight
VLP-32E
Velodyne Lite
Lite
Velodyne
VLP-16
Lite
CL-360 VLP-16
VLP-16
VLP-16
Velodyne
Velodyne
Teledyne
VLP-32E
Velodyne
VLP-16
Lite
Velodyne
CL-360
Optech
Teledyne
Lite
VLP-16
Optech Lite
CL-360
VLP-16
Optech
VLP-16
VLP-32E
Lite Lite
3D Target 3D
Brand
Emesent
True
Geo-MMS
Target
3D
Geo-MMS
Vx-15
Brand
Emesent
Brand
View
True
Scanfly
Target3D
LiDAR410
True
View
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Model
Brand
VLP-32E
Scanfly
Emesent
3DIS
Geo-MMS
Target
LITE
HD2 View
410
True
M8
Scanfly
CL-360
Geo-MMS
Emesent
ULTRA 3DIS410
View
LiDAR
LITE
Scanfly
HD2
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
330
Model
VLP-32E
Scanfly
3DIS
Geo-MMS
LiDAR
ULTRA
Model
200
410
150
M83DIS
Scanfly
100
LITE
120
CL-360
HD2775
Scanfly
VLP-32E 200 200
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
LITE
HD2
LiDAR
Model
CL-360
VLP-32E
ULTRA
200
(V)20,
150
M8
(V)30,
100
(V)40,
120(V)20,
CL-360
775
FOV360
(V)40,
200 200
(H)360
360LiDAR
100
120
(deg)
775
(H)360(H)360(V)20,
(V)20,
150
M8
(V)30,
100
775
(V)40,
200 (H)360
(V)30,
(V)40,
120360
(V)40,
FOV 3242360
(deg)
(H)360
FOV 3FOV
(V)20,
5(H)360150360
(V)30,
(H)360
(V)40,
(V)40,
(deg) 200 (H)360
3242100
(deg)
(H)360 430
310
600 234 430 (H)360
(V)20,
300
(V)40, (H)360
3242 5430
310
600 430
33155 3322.6
300
300600 310 430
300 0.95
310
600 331552 53612 430
1.6
1.95 Quanergy
331552Quanergy
Velodyne
1.6
Velodyne
1.95
LiDAR
Velodyne
600 0.95
Velodyne 1.6
1.95 M8-Ultra
Quanergy
2 Puck
M8-Core
Puck
Velodyne
1.6
Velodyne
Ultra1.95
Velodyne
0.95
VLP-32C
Velodyne
Velodyne
33M8-Ultra
Quanergy
Lite
Velodyne
32MR
Velodyne
Sensor
LiDAR Puck Puck
LiDAR
VLP-32E
M8-Ultra
M8-Ultra
M8-Core
Quanergy
Puck
Velodyne
Lite
Puck
Velodyne
Ultra 32MR
Puck
GNSS
Sensor
LiDAR
Velodyne
Puck
VLP-32C
Velodyne
Sensor M8-Core
Quanergy
Puck
Lite
Puck
32MR
IMU Ultra Lite
32MR
StorageCamera
GNSS
Sensor IMU
Puck
VLP-32C
Velodyne
GNSS M8-Core
** StorageCamera
StorageCamera
GNSS
VLP-32C
IMU ** * **
IMUStorageCamera **
GroupGroup
GeoCue
GeoCue Group
GeoCue
Geodetics Geodetics Group
GeoCue
LSView
Geodetics
Geo-MMS Geodetics
Nano M8
LiDAR Scanfly
LSGeo-MMS
Geo-MMS Nano ULTRA
M8
LiDARLS200
(m)
Geo-MMS NanoLiDAR
M8 200
(m) 360 (V)40,
200
(m)360 332360
Returns 360 332 400
Returns 2
**332 430 32 400
Returns 23
** (cm) 400 1.95
232(cm)
** (cm)
(kg) 5 miniVUX-1UAV
Quanergy
1.95
232 (kg)
(cm)
(kg) 0.95
CL-360 Velodyne
M8-Core
Quanergy
1.95
(kg) Ultra
M8-Core
CL-360Quanergy PuckM8-Core
CL-360
True VLP-32C
Hovermap
True 410VF1
True
View Hovermap
3DIS
410
True LSView
VLP-32C Nano
Hovermap
View3DIS410VF1 M8
VLP-32C
Hovermap
100
LiDAR
3DIS
410VF1
2003DIS
200 VF1 100
(V)20,
200 200
VLP-32C
(m)
360
100
(H)360
(V)20,
200 100
(V)20,
(H)360 360
(H)360
(V)20, 360(H)360
3 360Returns 300
430 300
430 400
**
300
430 3 300 1.8 232 Velodyne Teledyne
1.8
Quanergy 1.95
1.8
Quanergy
2 Optech
Teledyne
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.8
M8-Ultra
Quanergy Quanergy
Lite
Velodyne
M8-Ultra
QuanergyCL-360
Optech
VLP-16 M8-Core
Teledyne
Velodyne
VLP-16
M8-Ultra Lite
M8-Ultra Optech
Teledyne
VLP-16
Lite Lite Optech
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
Scanfly LiDAR
Geo-MMS
LiDARVLP-16
CL-360
Geo-MMS
ULTRAScanfly LiDAR
Geo-MMS
LiDARVLP-16
Geo-MMS
ULTRAScanfly LiDAR
CL-360
775
100 Geo-MMS
LiDAR
ULTRA VLP-16
100 LiDAR
CL-360
775
(V)40, 360
(H)360
100 VLP-16
(V)40,
100360
CL-360
775 (H)360
(V)40, 2 4 100
775
(V)40,
(H)360 360
(H)360
2 4 300
310
700
600 2 360 2 4 300
310
700
600 6
700155 2
4 300
310
700
600 1.59
6
0.95155 6 300
310 Velodyne
1.591
Velodyne
Velodyne6
0.95 5
5 VLP-16
Velodyne
1.59
5
1
VLP-32E
Velodyne
Ultra
Velodyne
0.95 VLP-16
Velodyne
1.59
VLP-32E
Velodyne
Puck Velodyne
Ultra VLP-32E
Velodyne
Puck VLP-16
Velodyne
VLP-32E
Ultra Puck VLP-16
3D Target
GroupGroup3D
GeoCue
Target
GeoCue
Vx-15+
Scanfly
Geo-MMS
Group
3DHovermap
Target3DLiDAR
Geo-MMS
Group
LSVLP-32E
Nano
Scanfly M8
HD2
GeoCue LSGeo-MMS
Target
LITE Scanfly
Geo-MMS
HF1 Scanfly
M8
Hovermap
LiDAR
Hovermap
Nano
VLP-32E
Scanfly
LITE
LiDAR
Scanfly
Geo-MMS M8 HF1
M8
LSVLP-32E
Nano
HD2
330
Scanfly
LiDAR
Scanfly
ULTRA
LS
HD2
100
150
M8
Hovermap
LITE
LiDAR
HF1
200
M8Nano
VLP-32E
Scanfly
120
LITE
150
M8 M8
HD2
(V)30,
HF1 100
(V)20,
150
200
(V)40,
120
360
(H)360
360
100
(V)20,
150
360
(H)360
200
120
(V)30,
100
(V)40,
(V)20,
200
(V)40,360 3322360
(H)360
360
(V)30,
(H)360(V)20,
(H)360
(V)40,
120
(V)40, 360
(V)30,
(H)360
(H)360
3 360
(V)40,
(H)360
5(H)360
(H)360
360 3322200
(H)360 300
430
400
600
300
223 430 2 430
2325 3603245 5400
300600
600
300
3
300
430
235 3 2.6
400
600
300 1.95
400
600
300
1.6
235 5533
3
1.8
1.95 23 Velodyne
Velodyne
1.6
Quanergy
RIEGL
1.8
Quanergy
1.95
Velodyne
Teledyne
Velodyne
1.95
0.95
2353 Quanergy
1.6
1.8
RIEGL
CL-360
1.95
Puck
Velodyne
1.6
M8-Core
Quanergy
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.8
M8-Core
Quanergy
1.95
VLP-32C
Velodyne
Optech
Lite
VelodyneLite
Velodyne
M8-Core
Teledyne
Puck
Velodyne
1.95
Puck
Quanergy
Velodyne RIEGL
Quanergy
Velodyne
32MR
Velodyne
M8-Core
VLP-16
Velodyne
RIEGL
Optech
Puck
Lite
Ultra
Puck Lite
M8-Core
VLP-16
M8-Core
CL-360Quanergy
VLP-32C
Velodyne
M8-Core
Teledyne
VLP-32C
Velodyne
32MR
Puck
Puck
VLP-16
Lite
Lite
RIEGL Lite
M8-Core
CL-360
VLP-32C
Optech
Puck
Lite
CL-360
Teledyne
32MR *
Optech * ** *
Emesent
Geodetics GeoCue
Emesent
Geodetics
Emesent
Geodetics
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
True LS
Geo-MMS View Emesent
Geodetics
Nano
VLP-32C
LiDAR LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Vux
Geo-MMS
410
True
LiDAR LS
3DIS
Geo-MMS Nano
VLP-32C
LS
CL-360
View
True
M8 LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Vux
Nano
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
VLP-32C
410
True
View
LiDAR LS 330
3DISNano
VLP-32C
Vux
CL-360
775
200
View
410
150
M83DIS LiDAR
LiDARGeo-MMS
Vux
Geo-MMS
410 330
CL-360
775
(V)20,
3DIS
200
150 330
LiDAR
360 LiDAR
(H)360
200 330
CL-360
775
(V)20,
200360
(H)360
(V)20, 345360 360 775360
(V)20,
(H)360 345 430
(H)360 100
310 32 430 3 430100300
310 361553 3524 430
100
430 100 2.95
310 3615532 31.59 355 miniVUX-2UAV
310 2.95
Quanergy
1.95
361532Quanergy
2.95 Velodyne
2.95
1M8-Core
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
2VLP-16
M8-Core 2VLP-16
Quanergy
Puck
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
32MR
M8-Ultra
M8-Core M8-Ultra * * * *
LiDAR SWISS
Group LiDARGeo-MMS
LiDAR
Group Hovermap
Geo-MMS
SWISS
LS LiDAR
Geo-MMSGeo-MMS
LiDAR
Scanfly
Nano
SWISS HF1
Hovermap
LiDAR
Group VLP-16
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
VF1
Geo-MMS
ULTRASWISS
Scanfly
M8 LS LiDAR
Nano
Geo-MMS
ScanflyM8
Hovermap
VLP-16 HF1
Hovermap
LiDARVLP-16
LiDAR
VF1 HF1
100
VF1
Geo-MMS
ULTRAScanfly
M8 LS200 150
Nano
LiDAR
ULTRA M8
VLP-16
100 HF1
VF1
(V)40,
LiDAR
ULTRA
M8 LS100
200 360
(V)20,
Nano150
100
100
360 (H)360
360
(H)360
M8(V)40,
100
200360
(H)360
360
(V)40, 3 2 360 3
2
(V)40,
(H)360100
200360
(H)360
360 3 2 300
700
600
400 22
(V)40, 300 (H)360
360 32 300
700
600
400 300
300
2
600 5 3 300
700
600
400 1.8
1.59
0.95
1.95
2 5 5 Velodyne
700 1.8
Velodyne
1.59
Velodyne
Velodyne
400 0.95
Quanergy
1.95
2 5 1.8 Velodyne
Velodyne
miniVUX-1UAV1.59Ultra
RIEGL
CL-360
0.95 1.8
VLP-16
Velodyne
Velodyne
VLP-32E
Velodyne
6
Velodyne
0.95
M8-Core
Quanergy
1.95
2 Lite
Puck
Velodyne Velodyne
Velodyne
miniVUX-1UAV VLP-16
VLP-16
Ultra M8-Core
Velodyne
miniVUX-1UAV
RIEGL Lite
VLP-16
VLP-32E
Velodyne
Puck
M8-Core
CL-360Quanergy
1.95
Ultra
RIEGL VLP-16
miniVUX-1UAV
VLP-16 VLP-32E
Ultra
RIEGL
Puck Lite
Velodyne
Lite Puck
M8-Core
CL-360Quanergy
CL-360VLP-32E
M8-Core
Emesent
3D Target Emesent
3D Group
Target
Scanfly
Emesent Emesent
VLP-32E
3D Target
LITE VLP-32E
Scanfly LITE VLP-32E
Scanfly
100
200 LITE VLP-32E
(V)30,
100
(V)40,
200 (H)360 (V)30,
100
(V)40,
200 (H)360
2 (V)30,
(V)40, (H)360
2 300
600 2 300
600 3 5 300
600 1.6
3 5 Velodyne
1.6
3
Teledyne5 Puck
Velodyne
1.6
VLP-32C
Optech
Teledyne Lite Puck
Velodyne
VLP-32C
Optech Lite
Teledyne Puck Lite
VLP-32C * * * *
Geodetics 3D
Geodetics LS Nano
Target Vux
Geodetics
Note: LS Nano
(V) Scanfly
LS Vux
Nano
Geodetics
vertical; LS 330
LITENano Vux330360
Vux
(H) horizontal; 100
200
330
*360
optional; 3303605360
(V)30,
(V)40,
** at3422360 (H)36036025 laser
(H)360
maximum 100 225 pulse5 repetition 100 300600
100 100 2.95 535 2.95 1.6 2.95 2.95 Velodyne
Velodyne
Teledyne Puck LiteOptech
VLP-32C
Optech * * * *
GeoCue
LiDAR SWISSLiDARGeoCueGeo-MMS
Geo-MMS
LiDARHovermap
GeoCue
Geo-MMS LiDAR
VLP-32C
LSGeo-MMS
Surveyor
SWISSLiDAR
Nano
SWISS
Hovermap
Geo-MMS
True View
LiDAR
GeoCue
LiDARGeo-MMS
Geo-MMSVF1
Geo-MMS
410HF1
True
VLP-16
Hovermap
CL-360
SWISS
Geo-MMS
M8 LS M8
Hovermap
Geo-MMS
LiDAR
LiDAR
VLP-32C
LiDAR
Geo-MMS LiDAR
VLP-16
LiDARVF1
Geo-MMS
Surveyor
Hovermap
VLP-32C
LiDAR
Surveyor
Nano M8
Geo-MMS
Hovermap
Geo-MMS
3DIS
View HF1VLP-16
Hovermap
VLP-32C
LiDAR
CL-360
LS775
100
200
150
LiDAR
LiDAR M8
Hovermap
100
HF1
100
Geo-MMS
410
True 3DIS
200
View
VLP-16
100
LiDAR
Surveyor
VF1 CL-360
Nano M8
LiDAR
M8 VF1CL-360
LS775
100
200
(V)20,
HF1 150
M8
100
(V)40,
LiDAR 100
Geo-MMS
410 (V)20,
3DIS
200
360
100
Nano775
100 360
M8
(H)360
150
100
(H)360
775
100
200
(V)20,
LiDAR 150
100360
360
(H)360
(V)20,
(V)40,
(V)20,
200 (H)360
23
360
360 (V)20,
(H)360
(V)20,
360
2 200360 32
(H)360
(H)360
3
42 400300
310
430
300
700
430 223242 700
300 300
36033422 400
310
430
300430
700
430 236153 53rate
300
300
310
3
430
300 300(PRR)
310
300
400
430
430
1.59
2361532 331.59
1.8
2.3
1.95
3
1.8 and
3615 400
full
Velodyne
1.59
Velodyne
1.8
2.3
Quanergy
1.95
3
Velodyne
1.8
Velodyne
Quanergy
power—single
231532 Velodyne
miniVUX-1UAV
1.8
RIEGL
1.8
VLP-16
Velodyne
2.3VLP-16
1.59 Velodyne
1.8
22VLP-16
2.3
Velodyne
M8-Core
Quanergy
1.95
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.8
VLP-32E
Velodyne
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
Lite return.
Velodyne
miniVUX-1UAV VLP-16
VLP-16
Velodyne
miniVUX-1UAV
RIEGL
Lite
Quanergy
Velodyne M8-Core
Quanergy
VLP-161.95
Velodyne Lite
VLP-16
Velodyne VLP-16
miniVUX-1UAV
VLP-16 RIEGL
Lite
M8-Core
VLP-16
VLP-32E
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
VLP-16
Lite
M8-Core
VLP-16
Lite
Lite
M8-UltraRIEGL
Quanergy
Lite M8-Core
Emesent Emesent LS Nano
Scanfly Vux
ULTRA
Emesent True
LS
Scanfly View
Nano Vux
ULTRA 410
LS 330
Nano
Scanfly 100
3DIS Vux
ULTRA LS330
(V)40,(V)40,
Nano 100
200
360
(H)360(H)360
Vux (V)40,
(V)20,
330
(V)40,360
(H)360 2 5 (H)360
2
(H)360330
(V)40, 360
(H)360 2 5 100
6003 360 5
2 100
600 700 55 6 5 100
600 2.95
0.95 55 3 100 2.95
Velodyne
0.95 5
5 Velodyne
CL-360
2 Ultra2.95
5
Velodyne
0.95 VLP-32E
Velodyne
CL-360
Quanergy
Puck Ultra VLP-32E
2.95
Velodyne
PuckCL-360
M8-Ultra
CL-360 Ultra Puck
Group
GeoCue
LiDAR SWISSLiDARGeoCue
GeoCueVLP-32E
Emesent
GroupGeo-MMS
Group Group
Surveyor
Surveyor
SWISSLiDAR LiDAR
Ultra
SWISSScanfly
VLP-32E
Geo-MMS
VLP-32E
GeoCue
Geo-MMS LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Surveyor
Surveyor
LiDAR ULTRA
LiDAR
VLP-32E
Ultra
Surveyor SWISS
Surveyor 200
LiDAR
100
Surveyor
Surveyor
200
Ultra (V)40,
Ultra 200
100
200 (H)360
360
100
200 (V)40,
(V)40,
200
100 (H)360
2
36022360
200360 (H)360
(V)40,
200 (H)360
2
36022 300
360(V)20,360 600
300
600 2
(V)40, 2 (H)360
2 600
2 300
300 600
600 300 3
300
600 5 2 600
300
600 1.59 3
2.3
2.7 5
5 5 Velodyne 600 Velodyne
3
Teledyne
Velodyne
2.3
2.7 0.95
5 RIEGL
miniVUX-1UAV 2.3 Velodyne
VLP-32C
Velodyne
3
Optech
Teledyne
VLP-16
Velodyne
2.3
miniVUX-1UAV
VLP-32
2.7VLP-162.7 Velodyne
RIEGL Ultra
VLP-32C
Velodyne
Optech
TeledyneTeledyne Puck
Optech
VLP-16
Velodyne
miniVUX-1UAV
VLP-32
VLP-16
RIEGL
VLP-32 VLP-32C
Velodyne
Optech
VLP-16 VLP-32C
miniVUX-1UAV
VLP-32 RIEGL * * * *
Geodetics Geodetics
Geo-MMS LiDAR
Geo-MMS VLP-16LiDAR
Geo-MMS VLP-16
100LiDAR VLP-16
100 360 100
Geodetics
Group
Geodetics
Geo-MMSHovermap
True LSVLP-32C
LSView
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
Group
LiDAR
Nano
Nano
VLP-32E
Geo-MMS
Hovermap
410
LiDAR
VF1
TrueHovermap
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
Vux VLP-32C
CL-360
3DIS
View
Geo-MMS
M8 LS
True
LS
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
Group HF1 M8
Hovermap
LiDAR
Nano 410
View
LS
Nano
VLP-32E
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
VF1
Hovermap
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
HovermapTrue
Nano
Vux
LiDAR
CL-360
410
LS
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
HF1
775
100
VF1
3DIS
LiDAR
M8 LSView
200
M8 VLP-16
VLP-32C
LiDAR
Nano
3DIS
330
Nano
LiDAR
150
M8
Hovermap
100
410
CL-360
100 M8VF1
Vux
LiDAR
CL-360
LS775
(V)40,
100
(V)20,
3DIS
200
330
(V)20,
HF1 150
M8
100
100
VLP-32C
(H)360
100
775
(V)40,
100
360
Nano200
200 Vux
(H)360
360
775
(V)40,
(V)20,
(H)360
200
330
(V)20,
150
100
360
(V)20, 3245360
(H)360
(V)40,
(H)360
360 3 2
(H)360
2 330360
(H)360
360 (V)20,
3245 400
(H)360
(H)360
360 3 2
310
700
430
100
430
300
323242 700 360334252 400
310
700
430
100
430
300
261553 65 400
300
310
700
430
400
3
300
310
430
100
430
300
2615532 32615 100
1.8
1.95
2.95
3
1.8
Velodyne
1.59
215532Velodyne
1.8
Velodyne
Quanergy
1.95
2.95
Quanergy
3
Velodyne
1.8
1.59
1.8
1.95
CL-360
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.59
2 Velodyne
1.8
VLP-32E
Velodyne
Velodyne
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
M8-Core
1.95
2.95
M8-Core
Quanergy
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.8
Lite
Velodyne
2Quanergy
5VLP-32E
Quanergy
Lite
VLP-16
Velodyne
VLP-16
Velodyne
VLP-32E
VLP-16
M8-Ultra
VelodyneQuanergy
M8-Core
CL-360
Lite
VLP-16
VLP-32E
M8-Ultra
M8-Core
2.95
M8-Core
Quanergy
VLP-16
Velodyne Lite
VLP-16
VLP-16
Lite
M8-Core
CL-360
M8-Core
VLP-16
Lite
M8-Ultra
Lite
Group VLP-32E
Surveyor Geo-MMS VLP-32E
Hovermap
Surveyor LiDARHF1
100 M8
Surveyor 100 150
100
Surveyor
360 (V)20,
100360 22360 360(H)360 3 2 430
300 3 1.8 Quanergy
Velodyne CL-360
M8-Core
VLP-16 Lite
LiDAR SWISS
Geodetics LiDAR
Geodetics
GeoCue
Emesent GeodeticsSurveyor
SWISSLiDAR
Revolution
Geo-MMS
Geodetics
GeoCue
GeoCue
Emesent
Emesent
Ultra
Surveyor
SWISS
LiDAR
GeoCue LiDAR
Revolution
60Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
Emesent Ultra
Surveyor Surveyor
SWISS
Revolution
LiDAR 200
Revolution
60LiDAR
Ultra
200
Geo-MMS Ultra
60200LiDAR 200
60200
(V)40, 200
100
(H)360
(V)40,
200 200
(V)40,
(H)360 (H)360
(V)40, 2 10036022 600
(H)360 300
600 22 600 3602 600 300
600 4.6 35 32 300
600
300
600 600 4.6 2.3
35 4.6
2.7
1.53 35 300 Velodyne
2.3
2.7
Velodyne
Teledyne5 Velodyne
miniVUX-1UAV
Velodyne
4.6
1.53 1.53
RIEGL
VLP-16
Velodyne
2.3
VLP-32
PUCK2.7
1.53
2.7 VLP-32C 5VLP-32C
miniVUX-1UAV
Velodyne
Velodyne
Optech
Teledyne Velodyne
Velodyne
RIEGL
VLP-16
Velodyne
PUCK
Velodyne 2.3
miniVUX-1UAV
VLP-32
Velodyne
OptechVLP-32
VLP-32CPUCK
Teledyne
RIEGLVLP-32C
RIEGL
VLP-16
Velodyne
VLP-32
PUCK
Optech
Teledyne VLP-16
miniVUX-1UAV
Optech
Geo-MMS
True VLP-32C
View
Geo-MMS LiDAR
Geo-MMS
LSGeo-MMS
Nano 410
True VLP-32C
CL-360
3DIS
LiDAR View
Geo-MMS
VLP-32C
M8 LS LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Nano 410
True 100
CL-360
775
3DIS
LiDAR
VLP-32C
M8 LSView
200 LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Nano 410
M8 (V)40,
100
CL-360
775
3DIS
200 (H)360
LiDAR
100
360 (V)40,
100
CL-360
775 (H)360
(V)40,
200360 324252360 (V)40,
775
(H)360 (H)360
324252 400700
310
32325 360 360324252 400
700
310 26155
700 700
42 400
310 261552 35265 310 Velodyne
261552 1.59
Quanergy VLP-32E
Velodyne
15Quanergy
M8-Ultra
Quanergy 2QuanergyVLP-32E
Velodyne
M8-Ultra
VelodyneQuanergy
VLP-32E VLP-32E
M8-Ultra
Group Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
M200
Group LS
Hovermap
Surveyor LiDAR
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Nano
Surveyor
Revolution
GroupVLP-32E
Series VuxTrue
Geo-MMS
LS
VF1
Ultra
M200
Group LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Snoopy M8
VLP-16 View
Geo-MMS
LS
Nano
Hovermap
Geo-MMSLS LiDAR
Surveyor
Hovermap
Surveyor
Revolution
60 VLP-32E
Series
M200
Nano
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Vux
LiDAR
Nano 410
Geo-MMS
LS
VF1
Ultra
M200
Snoopy
Revolution
VLP-32E
Series
M83DIS
LiDAR
150
M8
VLP-16
330
Nano
Hovermap
LiDAR
Vux
100
VF1
Surveyor
200
Revolution
60 LiDAR
LiDAR
M8
VLP-16
Surveyor
VLP-32E
150
Series
20060
Snoopy200
Vux(V)20,
VF1
Ultra 150
M8
VLP-16
330
100
Surveyor
60
Snoopy200
(V)40,
150
200
200
(H)360
200
150
100
330
Surveyor
360
100
150
(V)40,
200
(V)20,
Ultra
(H)360 150
330
200
(V)40,
150
(H)360
(H)360
(V)20,
100360
(H)360
(V)40, 2 360
(H)360
360 200360
(V)20,
100
(V)40,
(H)360
2
(H)360
360
(H)360
2
430
300
100
600
300
440
600 2 600
430
300
100
600430
300
440
600
3
400
300
100
4.6
2
300
3
440
600 3
430
300
100
600 4.6
300
440
1.95
3
1.59
2.95
1.8
2.3
2.7
1.53
1.7
23 4.6 23 300
600 1.95
3
Velodyne
1.59
2.95
Velodyne
1.8
2.3
Velodyne
2.7
Velodyne
4.6
1.53
Quanergy
1.7
2
Velodyne 1.95
2.95
1.8
CL-360
1.53
1.7
Velodyne
miniVUX-1UAV
M8-Core
2 VLP-161.95
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.59
2.95
Velodyne
1.8
2.3
Velodyne
VLP-32
Velodyne
PUCK2.7
Velodyne
1.53
M8-Core
Quanergy
1.7
VLP-32C
Velodyne Lite
Quanergy
VLP-32C
Velodyne
miniVUX-1UAV
M8-Core
VLP-16M8-Ultra
M8-Core
VLP-16
Velodyne
Velodyne
Velodyne VLP-16
VLP-32 Lite
M8-Core
VLP-16
2.3
Velodyne
PUCK2.7
Velodyne
M8-Core
CL-360Quanergy
Velodyne
VLP-32CPUCK
M8-Core
VLP-32C
M8-Core
VLP-16
VLP-16
Lite
miniVUX-1UAVVLP-32
PUCK
M8-Core
CL-360 Lite
Velodyne
CL-360VLP-16
VLP-32
LiDAR SWISS
Geodetics LiDAR SWISS
Geodetics
LiDAR LiDAR
Geodetics
VLP-32C SWISS
Geodetics
SWISSVLP-32C VLP-32C
VLP-32C Teledyne TeledyneOptech
Teledyne miniVUX-1UAV
Optech Optech
Teledyne Optech
GeoCue LiDARUSA
LiDARUSA GeoCueGeo-MMS
Geo-MMS
GeoCue
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS LiDAR
Surveyor
LiDAR LiDAR
GeoCueGeo-MMS
Geo-MMS
Ultra
Geo-MMS
LiDARUSA
Revolution LiDARVLP-16
CL-360
Geo-MMS LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
SurveyorLiDAR
Revolution
60 LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
LiDAR
Ultra
LiDARVLP-16
100
LiDARLiDAR
CL-360
775
Geo-MMS
Revolution
60 100 LiDAR
VLP-16
Surveyor
200 Ultra
LiDAR VLP-16
100
Surveyor
200
775 360
100
360
Revolution
60100 Ultra
60 100
200
100360
360 2
4 2360 200
100360
360 2
4 2 300
600
310
300 2 360 2 2 300
600
310
300 300
4.6 15 5 2 300
600
300 1.59
2.7
4.6
1.5315 5 5 600
300 Velodyne
1.59 5
Velodyne
2.7 5
Velodyne
4.6
1.53 RIEGL
1.59 VLP-16
Velodyne
1.59
VLP-32
Velodyne
PUCK2.75
Velodyne
4.6
1.53 RIEGL
VelodyneRIEGL
VLP-16
Velodyne
VLP-32
Velodyne
PUCK2.7 RIEGL
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.53 VLP-16
VLP-32
Velodyne
PUCK
Velodyne VLP-32 PUCK
M200
LiDARUSA
Geo-MMS Series
Geo-MMS
LSView
SnoopyNano M200
LiDARSnoopy
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
M8 LS
Geo-MMS
A-series Series
Geo-MMS
SnoopyM8Nano M200
Snoopy
CL-360
LiDAR
M8
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
A-series 150
Series
LiDAR
LS
Snoopy Nano
M8 Snoopy
CL-360
775 M8
LiDAR (V)40,
150
LS100
(V)20,
A-series M8Nano(H)360
775 360
M8(V)40,
150
(V)20, (H)360
32 35360 (V)40,
4 360
(V)20, (H)360
32 35 400 440
430
700322425 310 32 440
35 400
430
700 310
2365
3 440
13 400
100 1.95
430 1.7
2365
3 16 400 Quanergy
1.7
1.95
2365
3 M8-Core
Quanergy
1.7
1.95
2Quanergy M8-Core
Quanergy
1.95 M8-Core
Quanergy M8-Core
LiDAR SWISS
Group LiDAR
True
Group
LS
SWISS
Nano
Surveyor
LiDAR
VLP-32E
Vux
410
True
Group
M200
LS
3DIS
SWISS
Nano
Geo-MMS
Snoopy
LS
View
True
VLP-32E
Series
Vux
Nano
Surveyor410
True LSSnoopy
LiDAR330
3DIS
Surveyor
View 410 Nano
A-series
Vux
200
View M8
Surveyor
100
3DIS
200
VLP-32E
Vux
410 330
(V)40,
(V)20,
3DIS
200
(V)40,
200 150
150
100
330
360
(H)360
100
100
200
(H)360
200
(V)40,
330
(V)20,
(V)40,
100
(V)20,
200360
(H)360
(V)40,
(V)20,
(V)40,
200 (H)360
(V)40, 2 360(H)360
(H)360
(V)40,
(V)20,
(H)360
(V)40,
(H)360 (H)360
(H)360
2 100
32
300
700
430
600 2 100430
300
700
430
600 36
440
700
100
300
700
430
600
700
300
700
430
600 2.51
362 336235
2.95
2.3 Velodyne
2.51
362 Teledyne
2.95
Velodyne
2.3
Velodyne
Quanergy
Velodyne
Teledyne
miniVUX-1UAV
1.7
2.51
2.95
2.3 VLP-32E
Velodyne
2.51
2.95
VLP-16
Velodyne
2.3
VLP-32E
Velodyne
M8-Ultra
Quanergy
2 CL-360
CL-360VLP-32C
Velodyne
Optech
Teledyne
Quanergy
Quanergy
2Velodyne
Velodyne
Optech
VLP-32E
VelodyneVelodyne
M8-Core
M8-Core
VLP-32E
VLP-16
Velodyne
VLP-32E
Velodyne
M8-Ultra
Velodyne
CL-360Quanergy
VLP-32E
M8-Ultra
VLP-32C
Velodyne
CL-360
Optech
Teledyne
miniVUX-1UAV VLP-32C
miniVUX-1UAVOptech
miniVUX-1UAV
VLP-32E
VLP-16
VLP-32E
M8-Ultra
VLP-16VLP-32C
LiDARUSA LiDAR
Geodetics LiDARUSA Group
Geo-MMS
M200 SWISS
Geo-MMS
VLP-32C
Geo-MMS
Geodetics
LiDARUSA
Snoopy LiDAR
LiDARUSA
Revolution
Series LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
M200 60
LiDAR Geo-MMS
SnoopyVLP-32C
CL-360
Geo-MMS
Geodetics
A-series
Snoopy LiDAR
Revolution
Series LiDAR
Geo-MMS
VLP-32E
VLP-32C
M200 LiDAR
Snoopy
CL-360
LiDAR
A-series VLP-32C
CL-360
775
Revolution
60 100
150
SnoopySeries LiDAR
M200
Snoopy
CL-360
775 775
(V)40,
A-series 150 360
Revolution
60100
Series(H)360
775 60
Snoopy
360 100
(V)40,
150360
(H)36024 360 100
(V)40,
4 150360
(H)360
24 310
300
440
(V)40,
700 4 360
310 (H)360
2 310
300
440
700 4.6
2
3101 12 300
440 4.6
1.53
1.7
2 1 1 300
440 Velodyne
4.6
1.53
Quanergy
1.7
2 RIEGL PUCK
Velodyne
4.6
1.53
M8-Core
Quanergy
1.7
2 RIEGL PUCK
Velodyne
1.53
M8-Core
Quanergy
1.7 RIEGL PUCK
Velodyne
M8-Core
Quanergy
RIEGL M8-Core PUCK
Geo-MMS
Geodetics LiDAR
SurveyorGeo-MMS
LSSurveyor
Nano
LS Ultra
M8
Nano
VLP-16
Geo-MMS
Surveyor
LS M8
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Snoopy Ultra
Surveyor
Nano
LS M8
Nano
VLP-16
LiDAR
A-series
LiDAR 100VLP-16
Surveyor
200
Ultra
M8 200 UltraVLP-16
(V)40,
LS100
200 360
100
100
(H)360
360
100
200 360 200360
(V)40,
(V)40,
100360
(V)40, 33252360
(H)360 (H)360
(V)40,
(H)360
360 (H)360
360
3 330360 33252 400 700
6002222 360252 400 700
600700 265565 25 430
700
300
600 700
700 2.51
600 1.95265565 651.95
1.59
2.7 65 100 Velodyne
2.51
6565 1.59
Velodyne
1.59
Velodyne
Velodyne
2.7
Quanergy
1.95 2.51 VLP-32E
Velodyne
2.51
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.59
VLP-32E
Velodyne
VLP-32
Velodyne
2.7
2.7 CL-360
CL-360M8-Core
Quanergy Velodyne
VelodyneVLP-32E
Velodyne
RIEGL VLP-32VLP-32E
VLP-16
Velodyne
VLP-32E
VLP-16
VLP-32E
VelodyneVelodyne
VLP-32
Velodyne
VLP-32E
M8-Core
CL-360 VLP-16
VLP-32E
VLP-32
LiDARUSA
LiDAR SWISS
Geodetics LiDARUSA
LiDAR M200
LS
Snoopy
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
SWISS
Geodetics
Snoopy
Geo-MMS
Nano
VLP-32E
LiDARUSA
Series
LiDAR
Vux
miniVUX
M200
LS
Snoopy
LiDAR
LiDARGeo-MMS
Geo-MMS
Snoopy
SWISS
Geodetics
A-series
LiDAR
Nano
Surveyor
Snoopy
VLP-32E
M8
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS Vux
miniVUX
LiDARUSA
Series
LiDAR
Snoopy
Geo-MMS M200
LS
Snoopy
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Surveyor
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
VLP-32E
Snoopy
SWISS
A-series
Nano
330
100
miniVUX
VLP-32E
150
M8
LiDAR
LiDAR150
Snoopy
LiDAR M8
Series
100
200
Geo-MMS
Vux
miniVUX
SurveyorLiDAR
LiDAR
M200
Snoopy
Nano
330
100
(V)20,
150
M8
(V)40,
A-series 150
Snoopy
LiDAR
360
Series
100
200
330
100 Vux
(H)360
150
(H)360
Snoopy
330
100
(V)20,
150
(V)40,
A-series 150
100
200
360
(H)360
(V)20,
(H)360
2
360 (V)20,
(H)360
(V)40,
150
100
(H)360
(H)360
2 3352 400
100
300
430
440
(V)40,
700
600
3 430
(H)360
2
100
300
440
700
600
400
100
300
3
43023 6 2
100
300
440
700
600
2.95
2.9
2.3
3
1.7
2
2.51
3 6 325 440 700
325 Quanergy
2.95
2.9
Velodyne
2.3
Quanergy
Teledyne
miniVUX-1UAV
Quanergy
1.7
2.51
Velodyne
3 6
1.95
2.9
2.3
RIEGL
M8-Core
M8-Core
5M8-Core
2.95
2.9
VLP-16
Velodyne
2.3
Quanergy
Optech
Quanergy
1.7
2
VLP-32E
2.51
VLP-32C6
Velodyne
QuanergyCL-360
Velodyne
Quanergy
Teledyne Teledyne
miniVUX-1UAV
M8-Core
2.95
VLP-16
Velodyne
VLP-16
M8-Core
Quanergy
M8-Core
Optech
Teledyne
miniVUX-1UAV
RIEGL Optech
miniVUX-1UAV
M8-Core
Quanergy
1.7
VLP-32E
2.51
VLP-32C
Velodyne RIEGL
VLP-16
M8-Core
Optech
miniVUX-1UAV
M8-Core
Quanergy
VLP-32E
Velodyne
VLP-32C M8-Core
VLP-32E
Geodetics
Geo-MMS LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Revolution Geo-MMS
CL-360LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Revolution
60 LiDAR
CL-360
775 LiDAR
Revolution
60 100 CL-360
60775
100 200 (V)40,
775
100 32452360 (H)360 360 32452 400 310
3002342 400 42 400 310
300 600
4.6 1 2 700 310
300 1 4.6 321 1 Quanergy Velodyne RIEGL
VLP-32C
LSVLP-32C
Snoopy
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
Nano
LS
Surveyor
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
M8
Nano
miniVUX LS
Snoopy
LiDAR
Ultra
Geo-MMS M8 Nano
LS
VLP-32C
Snoopy
Geo-MMS
Surveyor
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
LiDAR
Surveyor
VLP-16LiDAR
M8
Revolution
Nano
miniVUX
Snoopy200
M8
330
miniVUX
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
VLP-32C
Ultra
Geo-MMSSurveyor
LiDAR 200
LiDAR
Ultra
VLP-16
100
CL-360
60200LiDAR
miniVUX
VLP-32C
100LiDAR
VLP-16Ultra 200
330
(V)40,
100
200
VLP-16
100
775
360
100
200
330
100
200
360
100
360(V)40,
(H)360 330
100
200360
(H)360
(V)40,
100360 2360 3 360
(V)40,
(H)360 360
(H)3602 700 100
600
30022552 100 252 700
100
600700
300
310
265
300
400
100
600 5 600 4.6
100
300
1.53
1.95
265
2.9
2.7
1.59 5 651.95 55 300 Velodyne
4.6
1.53
Quanergy
1.95
2.9
65
Velodyne
2.7 RIEGL
1.53
1.95 PUCK
Velodyne
1.53
M8-Core
Quanergy
RIEGL2.9
2.7 VLP-32E
2.9
5 CL-360
Velodyne
1.59 Velodyne
VLP-32
2.7
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.59
RIEGL
M8-Core
Quanergy
Velodyne PUCK
Velodyne
M8-Core
Velodyne
RIEGL
VLP-32E
CL-360
Velodyne PUCK
M8-Core
Velodyne
VLP-32
VLP-32E
VLP-16
Velodyne
CL-360
PUCK
VLP-32E
VLP-32
CL-360
VLP-32 VLP-16
LiDARUSALiDARUSA
Geodetics
LiDAR SWISS Geodetics
LiDAR M200
LS
SWISS
Nano
LS
Surveyor
LiDARUSA
VLP-32E
SCOUT-16
Snoopy Vux
Nano
Geodetics
Series M200
LS
A-series
Snoopy
Nano
VuxLS
Surveyor Vux
Nano
LiDARUSA
VLP-32E
SCOUT-16
Snoopy A-series
VLP-32E
SCOUT-16
Series M200
Snoopy
330
Vux
100
200
150
330
Surveyor
VLP-32E
SCOUT-16
SnoopySeries
330
100
(V)30,
A-series
Snoopy
(V)40,
Snoopy200
(V)40,
150
330
Surveyor
360 360(V)40,
(H)360
100
200
(H)360
100
(V)30,
A-series 200
(V)40,
150
360 2225360
(H)360
(V)30,
(V)40,
(H)360
360 5 100360
(V)30,
(V)40,
(H)360
(H)360
(V)40, 2225 600
(H)360
(H)360
100
300
700
440222 360
(V)40, (H)360 100
222 600
300
700
440
300
100
5.5365 52 600
300
6002
300
700
440
2.95
2.3
5.5365 5.5
1.65
2.51
1.7
2 32.95 700 365 1.59
2.95
2.3
miniVUX-1UAV
Velodyne
5.5
1.65
2.51
Velodyne
miniVUX-1UAV
Quanergy
1.7
2
2.95
RIEGL
1.65 VLP-16
2.3
Velodyne
1.65
VLP-32E
2.51
VLP-32C
Velodyne Velodyne
65Velodyne
miniVUX-1UAV VLP-16
VLP-16
2.3
miniVUX-1UAV
miniVUX-1UAV
RIEGL
miniVUX-1UAV
M8-Core
Quanergy
miniVUX-1UAV
RIEGL 1.7 Velodyne
VLP-32E
2.51
VLP-32C
VelodyneVelodyne
M8-Core
Quanergy
miniVUX-1UAV
RIEGL RIEGL
VLP-16
VLP-32C VLP-16
Velodyne
VLP-32E
VLP-32C
M8-Core RIEGL
Velodyne VLP-16
VLP-32E
* * * *
LiDAR SWISS Geodetics
LiDAR
SnoopySWISSminiVUX M200
Snoopy Series
miniVUX Snoopy
Snoopy330 miniVUX
Snoopy330 150
360
miniVUX (V)40,
330360
3603552360 330360 (H)360 3603552 400 100 360352 400 100 440
25 2 Teledyne 1.7 RIEGL
Optech
Teledyne QuanergyRIEGL
OptechM8-Core
Teledyne Optech
Phoenix LSVLP-32C
Revolution
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS LS
Geo-MMS
Phoenix Nano
Nano
LS
Surveyor
Phoenix
M8 LS
LiDAR
LiDAR
Ultra
Phoenix
SCOUT-16
VLP-32C
Geo-MMS
Vux
Nano
LiDAR
Geo-MMS LS
CL-360
Geo-MMS
Surveyor
Geo-MMS
VLP-32C
Revolution
60 Nano
LS
Geo-MMS
Nano
VuxLS
LiDAR M8
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Geo-MMS
SCOUT-16 LiDAR
Ultra
LiDAR
SCOUT-16
LSVLP-32C
Revolution
60 100
200
Geo-MMS
Revolution
Nano
Vux
Nano M8Nano
LiDAR
330
Vux 60
CL-360
775
Geo-MMS
Surveyor
200
LiDAR LiDARM8
330LiDAR
LiDAR
CL-360
SCOUT-16
60
Ultra 100
200
330
CL-360
775
Surveyor
200
(V)30,
360
100
200
330
360
775
(V)41.33,
100 360
Ultra 100
200
775
200
(V)30,360
(V)41.33,
(V)30, 4 2360 5 200
(V)30, 360
(V)41.33,
(H)360 4 2 300
100
310
600
300 4 352 100
2 360 4 2 300
100
310
600
300
4.6
300
400
100
310
5.5
3001 55 552 400 100
300
310
600
300
2.9
25
4.6
1.53
1.95
2.95
2.7
5.5
1.651 55 5.54.6
1 25 100
2.95 600
2.9
25
Velodyne
4.6
1.53
Quanergy
1.95
2.95
2.71
miniVUX-1UAV
Velodyne
5.5
1.65 5 1.95
2.95
RIEGL
1.65
PUCK2.9
5 Quanergy
Velodyne
1.53
1.53 M8-Core
Quanergy
1.95 Teledyne
miniVUX-1UAV
VLP-32
2.7
VLP-16 5
Velodyne
1.65 RIEGL
Velodyne
PUCK2.9
Optech
Velodyne
M8-Core
Quanergy
Velodyne PUCK
M8-Core
miniVUX-1UAV
VLP-32
2.7
VLP-16
VelodyneRIEGL
VLP-16
PUCK
M8-Core
miniVUX-1UAV
VLP-32
Velodyne
VLP-16 RIEGL VLP-32
LiDARUSA
LiDAR SWISS
LiDAR LiDARUSA
LiDAR
SWISS LiDAR Surveyor
SWISS
LiDARUSA
Snoopy
Snoopy LiDARUSA
SWISSSurveyor
A-series Surveyor
Snoopy
miniVUX
Snoopy Surveyor
A-series
Snoopy 100
200
Snoopy
100
A-series
miniVUX
Snoopy330 100 (V)40,
A-series
miniVUX
Snoopy100
(V)40,
200
100
330 (H)360
100
360
100
200
360 360
(H)360
miniVUX(V)40,
100
(V)40,
200
100 (H)360
(V)40,
(V)40,
330360 2
(V)41.33,
(V)40,
360
(H)360
2 5 360 (V)40,
(H)360
2
(V)40,
(H)360
(H)360
330 (H)360
360 2
(H)360
2 5 700
300
600
700
1002
2 2 300
360 2
2 5 700
300
600
700
100 700
600 6
300
3
7005 65 5 5 700
600
700
100 6
2.3
3
2.51
2.95 65 6
3 2.3 5
6 100 Velodyne
6
Velodyne
2.3
miniVUX-1UAV
Velodyne
3
2.51
2.956
Teledyne 2.51 VLP-32E
Velodyne
2.3 Velodyne
VLP-16
Velodyne
VLP-32C
Velodyne
VLP-32E
2.51
Optech
Teledyne
2.9
5 Velodyne
miniVUX-1UAV
miniVUX-1UAV
CL-360 VLP-16
Velodyne VLP-32E
VelodyneVelodyne
VLP-32E
VLP-16
miniVUX-1UAV
CL-360 VLP-16
VLP-32C
VelodyneVelodyne
VLP-32E
CL-360
Optech
Teledyne
VLP-32C
VLP-32E
2.9 VLP-32E
CL-360
VLP-32C
VLP-32E
Optech * * * *
SCOUT-32
VLP-32E SCOUT-32
VLP-32E
SCOUT-32 SCOUT-32
100
VLP-32E 100 100 100 24 (H)360 24 440 700 24 440
700 700 2.4 2.4 2.4 Teledyne Optech
Geodetics
Phoenix Geodetics M200
Geo-MMS
Phoenix Series
VLP-32C
LiDAR
SCOUT-16
Geodetics
Phoenix
LS Nano
Surveyor
Surveyor
M200
Snoopy
Geo-MMS
Geodetics
Phoenix
Revolution VuxLS
Ultra
Series
M200
CL-360
Geo-MMS
SCOUT-16
Nano
LS
Surveyor
Surveyor
M200
LiDAR Snoopy
VLP-32E
VLP-32CSeries
Geo-MMS
VLP-32C
Revolution
60 LiDAR
Vux
Nano LS
Ultra
150
Series
Snoopy
VLP-32C
CL-360
775 LiDAR
CL-360
Revolution
60SCOUT-16
100
330
Nano
Vux
100
Snoopy
Vux
(V)40,
150
CL-360
60775
(V)30,
SCOUT-16
100
330
100
(H)360
150
360
775
Revolution(H)360
(H)360
(V)41.33,
360
330
(V)40,
60150
775
(V)30,
100
330
(H)360
(V)40,
360
(H)360
(H)360
(V)41.33,
360 (H)360
(V)41.33, 360
252360
360
(V)40,
(V)30,
100 (H)360
360
(H)360
(H)360
(V)41.33,
360 310
252 400
300 425 360
(V)30,
100
300
600 (H)360 310
52 400
300
100
300
600
700
31021
440
4.6
5.5
100 55 52 400
440
310
300 5.5
100
1.7
21 12 300
4.6
1.53
1.65
2.95
2.3
2.7 55 22.3
21 RIEGL
Quanergy
1.7
miniVUX-1UAV
Velodyne
4.6
1.53
Velodyne
55 Quanergy 5.5
1.65
2.95
2.4 M8-Core
1.7
5 Velodyne
Velodyne
2.3
2.7 2.95
Quanergy
1.7
VLP-16
Velodyne
5.5
1.65
2.95
VLP-16
Velodyne
VLP-32
RIEGL
Quanergy
miniVUX-1UAV
PUCK
Velodyne
4.6
1.53 M8-Core
Quanergy
RIEGL
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.65
VLP-16
VLP-32
RIEGL
M8-Core
miniVUX-1UAV
PUCK
Velodyne
1.53 M8-Core
miniVUX-1UAV
PUCK
Velodyne
VLP-16
Velodyne *PUCK
VLP-16
*
* *
*
*
* *
LiDARUSA
LiDAR SWISS LiDARUSA
LiDAR LS
Geo-MMSNanoSurveyor
Surveyor
SCOUT-32
SWISS LiDARUSA
LiDAR M8 LS
LiDAR Ultra
Geo-MMS LS Surveyor
Nano
Surveyor
SCOUT-32
Geo-MMS
SWISS M8
Nano
LiDAR
SCOUT-32 LS200
Ultra
M8
Geo-MMS 100
Nano
200
SCOUT-32
100
LiDAR M8
LiDAR 200
100 100
360
200
200
100 360 200
100360 3 2 360 2 360 3 2 3
700 2 2 300
600 3 2 700 300
2
600
400
7002 700 1.95
2
2.42 2.7
2 1.95
2
2.42
miniVUX-1UAV 2.3
CL-360
RIEGL
2.7
1.95
2.4 M8-Core
Quanergy
1.95
2.4 VLP-16
Velodyne
RIEGL
VLP-32
Quanergy
miniVUX-1UAV CL-360
RIEGL VLP-16
M8-Core
CL-360Quanergy RIEGL
VLP-32
M8-Core
miniVUX-1UAV
miniVUX-1UAV M8-Core
CL-360
Phoenix Geo-MMS LiDARUSA
LiDAR
Snoopy
Phoenix SWISS
Snoopy A-series
Phoenix
SCOUT-16 Snoopy
miniVUX
SnoopySnoopyA-series
Snoopy
SCOUT-16 Snoopy
100
A-series
miniVUX
Snoopy330
miniVUX
Phoenix 200 A-series
miniVUX
SCOUT-16
100 (V)40,
100
330
200
(V)30,
SCOUT-16
100 (H)360
100
360
330
(H)360 (V)40,
100
200
(V)30,
100 (H)360
(V)40,
330360
(H)360 2 52 360 (V)40,
(H)360
(V)30,
100 (H)360
360
(H)360 2 52 700
100
600
300
(V)30, 2
5 2 52 700
100
600
300 700
100
5.535 6 700
100
600
300 2.51
2.9
5.53
1.655 6 5 6 300 Velodyne
2.51
2.95
Velodyne
3 6
Teledyne
Velodyne
5.5
1.65 2.51
2.9 VLP-32E
Velodyne
2.51
Optech
Teledyne
2.9
VLP-32C
Velodyne
VLP-16
Velodyne
5.5
1.65 VLP-32E
Velodyne
TeledyneVelodyne
Optech
Teledyne
VLP-32E
Optech
VLP-32C
Velodyne
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.65 VLP-32E
Optech
VLP-32C
VLP-16
Velodyne *
VLP-16 * * *
M200 Series
LiDAR
Surveyor M200
Snoopy
Geo-MMS
Ultra Series
CL-360
Surveyor
Geo-MMS M200
LiDAR Snoopy
Geo-MMS
Ultra
LiDAR 150
Series
CL-360
775 M200
LiDAR
CL-360Snoopy
(V)40,
150
Series(H)360
200
(V)41.33,
CL-360
775 360
775 Snoopy
(V)40,
150 (H)360
(V)40,
(V)41.33,
775360 (H)360
4 (V)40,
(H)360150 (H)360
(V)41.33,
360 4 440
(V)40,
310
6002 (H)360
(V)41.33, 4 440
310 6002 1 2 440
310 1.7
2 1 3 440 Quanergy
1.7
2 1
miniVUX-1UAV M8-Core
Quanergy
1.7
2 Velodyne
miniVUX-1UAV M8-Core
Quanergy
1.7
VLP-32C
miniVUX-1UAVM8-Core
Quanergy M8-Core
* * * *
LS Nano
Revolution
Surveyor M8
Revolution
VLP-32C
SCOUT-32 LS Nano
Revolution
60Ultra
Surveyor
LS M8
Nano
Revolution
60VLP-32C
VLP-32C
SCOUT-32 LS
60 200
Nano
100
Ultra
M8 60200 M8SCOUT-32
100
VLP-32C
SCOUT-32
100 200
100360
100 200360 200
360
200
100 100360322360 3602 100360322 400 3422 300
300 600 32 400 600400
300 2255 4.6
310
4.6
600
300 52 400 2.7
2255 4.6
1.95
4.6
1.53 211.53
2.7 Velodyne
5 Quanergy 2.7
1.95
Velodyne
1.53 RIEGL
225 Velodyne
1.95
Velodyne
1.53 VLP-32
Velodyne
2.7 M8-Core
Quanergy
1.95
PUCK
Velodyne RIEGL
VLP-32
Velodyne
2Quanergy
PUCK VLP-32
M8-Core
Quanergy
PUCK
miniVUX-1UAV
RIEGL
Velodyne RIEGL
VLP-32
M8-Core
PUCK M8-Core
Phoenix LiDARUSA
LiDARUSA Phoenix LSSurveyor
SnoopyNano Vux
Phoenix
LiDARUSA LS
A-series
Surveyor
Snoopy Nano
LS Surveyor
NanoVux
Phoenix
LiDARUSA LS
A-series
Surveyor
330
Nano
Vux
Snoopy
100 Vux
A-series 330
Snoopy
(V)40,
100
100
360
330
(H)360
(H)360
A-series
(V)41.33, 330360
360
(H)360
(V)40,
100 (H)360
(V)41.33, 2
360
5360 360
(H)360
(V)40,
100 (H)360
(V)41.33, 2 5 700
300
100
700 5 (V)41.33,
(V)40, (H)360
(H)3605 700
2
300
100100
700
300 5
6 2
700
300
100 2.95
700
2.4
2.3
2.51 5
6 55 700 700
2.4
Velodyne
2.3
2.95
Velodyne
2.51 5
6
2.3
CL-360
RIEGL
2.95 2.4
VLP-16
Velodyne
2.3
2.95
VLP-32E
Velodyne
2.51
6
Velodyne
CL-360
RIEGL
CL-360
RIEGL2.4
VLP-16
Velodyne
VLP-16
VLP-32E
Velodyne
2.51
VLP-16
CL-360
RIEGL
VLP-32E
Velodyne
*
VLP-32E
* * *
LiDAR SWISS LiDAR Snoopy
SWISSLiDARminiVUX
Revolution
SCOUT-16 Snoopy
SWISSSnoopy
Revolution
60 miniVUX
SCOUT-16 Snoopy
60 330
miniVUX miniVUX
SCOUT-16
100 330
(V)30,
100 360
330
360 330
(V)30,
100360
360 5 360 (V)30, 360
(H)3605 100
300 5 5
300 322 400 100
300 100
4.6
5.5 5 100
300 2.9
4.6
1.535 5 2.95
miniVUX-1UAV
Velodyne
1.53 2.9
RIEGL PUCK2.9
miniVUX-1UAV
Velodyne miniVUX-1UAV
miniVUX-1UAV
RIEGL PUCK RIEGL
M200
LiDAR
Geo-MMS
Series
SWISS
M200
SCOUT-32
Surveyor
LS
LS Nano
Nano
LiDAR
M200
Snoopy
Revolution
Series
Ultra
M8 Series
M200
Snoopy
SCOUT-32
Surveyor
Vux
Geo-MMS LS
LS Nano
LS
Nano
CL-360
Geo-MMS LS
Snoopy
Revolution
60SCOUT-16
Series
Ultra
SurveyorM8
Nano
LiDAR
15060150
Snoopy
SCOUT-32
100
Surveyor
Vux
Geo-MMS
Nano
LiDAR LS
LS 200
M8 Nano
Ultra
330
Nano
CL-360
775
Vux LiDAR
CL-360M8
Vux
(V)40,
100Ultra 150
SCOUT-32
100
200
330
CL-360
775
(H)360
100
(V)40,
150
360
200
200
360
330
775
360(V)40,
(H)360
200
330
775
(H)360
(V)30,
(V)40,
100360 2360
3603245360 360
360
(H)360
2 100360 2 440
3603245 400 34522 440
700
600
100
310
440
45 700
600400
100
310 22155 4.6
300
440
600
100
310 600 5.5
22 400
700
100
310
1.65
1.7
22155 5.5
2.4
2.7
1.95
2.95
4.6
2151.53
1.7
25 700 Velodyne
5.5
1.65
Quanergy
1.7
Teledyne
Velodyne
2.7
miniVUX-1UAV
Quanergy
1.95
2.95
1.53
1.65
2155 Quanergy
2.4 1.7
1.95
2.95
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.65
2.7 M8-Core
VelodyneQuanergy
Optech
Teledyne
VLP-32
Velodyne
2.7 PUCK
miniVUX-1UAV
M8-Core
Quanergy
1.95
2.95 Quanergy
VLP-16
Velodyne
Velodyne
2M8-Core
2.4 Quanergy
Teledyne Velodyne
M8-Core
Optech
Teledyne
RIEGL PUCK
VLP-16
M8-Core
Optech
2.4
VLP-32
Velodyne
miniVUX-1UAV
M8-Core
VelodyneQuanergy
miniVUX-1UAVVLP-32
M8-Core
VLP-16
Optech
VLP-32
M8-Core ** ** * ** *
Surveyor Surveyor 100
Surveyor (H)360
100 360 (H)360
100360 (H)360 (H)360 RIEGL RIEGL RIEGLVLP-16RIEGL
Phoenix
LiDAR SWISS
LiDARUSA LiDAR
LiDARUSA Phoenix
LiDARUSA
LiDAR SWISS
LiDARUSASWISS
Snoopy
M200
Snoopy Phoenix
LiDAR
Phoenix
M200 Series
Snoopy SWISS
M200
Snoopy
A-series
Snoopy
Series
miniVUX M200
Snoopy
A-series
Snoopy Surveyor
Series Snoopy
A-series
SnoopySeries 150
100
Snoopy
A-series
miniVUX
Snoopy330 150 (V)40,
100Snoopy 150
100 100
(H)360
(V)41.33,
(V)40,
150
100 (V)40, (H)360
(V)41.33,
(H)360(V)40, 2522360(H)360 360
(V)41.33,
2 330 2522 440
300
700 22 440 360522 440
700 300300
700 2565 265 100
440
700 300 2.512.3
2565 52.51
1.7 1.7
26 100 Velodyne
2.355 Quanergy
miniVUX-1UAV
Quanergy
1.7
Velodyne
2.51 CL-360
2.3
Velodyne
2.51 VLP-16
Velodyne
2.3
miniVUX-1UAV
M8-Core
Quanergy
1.7 VLP-32E
Velodyne CL-360
Velodyne
M8-Core
Quanergy
5VLP-32E VLP-16
Velodyne
miniVUX-1UAV
miniVUX-1UAV
M8-Core
CL-360
VLP-32E
Velodyne CL-360
VLP-16
M8-Core
VLP-32E
Revolution
SCOUT-16
SCOUT-32 Revolution
60SCOUT-16
Revolution
SCOUT-16
SCOUT-32
SCOUT-32 10060miniVUX
Revolution
60SCOUT-16
SCOUT-32
100
330
60100
(V)30,
100 360
miniVUX
(H)360
100
100
330
(V)30,
100360
(V)41.33,
(H)360
(V)30,
100 2 360 (V)30,
(H)360 360
(H)360
2
100
300
700 2 2 2
100
700 4.6
300 5.5300
7002 300 5.5
700
2.9
4.6
1.53
1.65
2.42 4.6
5.5 2
2.9
Velodyne
4.6
1.53
Velodyne
5.5
1.65
2.42
miniVUX-1UAVRIEGL
1.53
1.65
2.4 PUCK2.9
Velodyne
1.53
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.65
2.4 RIEGL
Velodyne
miniVUX-1UAV PUCK2.9
VLP-16
VelodyneVelodyne
RIEGL RIEGL
Velodyne
PUCK
VLP-16
miniVUX-1UAV PUCK
VLP-16
miniVUX-1UAV *
* *
* * *
*
LS Nano
LSSurveyor
Surveyor VuxLS Nano
LS Nano
LSSurveyor
Ultra
Surveyor VuxLS
Ultra 330
Nano
Vux
100
Surveyor
Surveyor Vux 330
100 360
330 330
100360 3225360 360(H)360 3603225 400 100
3252 700 3225 400
300 100
300 25
100 100
300 2.95
25
2.3 5 56 Quanergy 2.95
255 Velodyne
Velodyne
2.3 2.95 2.95
VLP-16
Velodyne
2.3 VLP-16
Velodyne VLP-16 *
LiDARUSA
LiDAR LiDARUSA
SWISS
Phoenix LiDARUSA
LiDAR LiDARUSA
PhoenixSnoopy
SWISS
M200
Nano
Snoopy
LiDAR M8
A-series
Phoenix
Series Snoopy Nano
A-series
SWISS
M200
Snoopy
M8
LSSurveyor
Surveyor
Nano
A-series
Snoopy
Series M200
LS
Snoopy
200
Ultra
M8
100
A-series
150 100Ultra
Nano
Series
M8 200
(V)40,
Snoopy100
(V)40,
150
360
100
(H)360
200
(H)360
(V)40,
100
(H)360
200
(V)40,
(H)360 360
(H)360
(H)360
(H)360
(V)40, 360
(H)360
2 (V)41.33, 600
700 600400
700 300
600 5
256 56 440 2.51
700 600 1.95
400 2.7
256 252.51
2.7
1.95
2 1.95
Velodyne
2.51 2.3
2.7
miniVUX-1UAVRIEGL
2.51 VLP-32
2.7
M8-Core
Quanergy
1.95
VLP-32E
Velodyne
RIEGL Velodyne
Quanergy
RIEGL
VLP-32E
miniVUX-1UAV VLP-32
M8-Core
Quanergy
VLP-16
VLP-32
M8-Core
VLP-32E
RIEGL
Velodyne
miniVUX-1UAVVLP-32E
miniVUX-1UAVVLP-32
M8-Core
LiDAR SWISS
Phoenix
Snoopy
SnoopyminiVUX
SCOUT-16
SCOUT-32
Surveyor Ultra
M200
Snoopy
miniVUX
Snoopy
SCOUT-32
Surveyor
Series
miniVUX
SCOUT-16 Ultra
Snoopy
330
miniVUX
100 330Ultra
SCOUT-16
SCOUT-32
100
Surveyor
200
330
(V)30,
100
200
150
(V)41.33,
360
SCOUT-16
100 330 360(V)40,
(H)360
150
(V)30,
100
100
200
(H)360
(V)40,
(V)41.33,
360 25360
(V)41.33,
(H)3602
(V)40,
2 (H)360
5 100
(V)30,
(H)360
25 440
(H)360
2
100
2 700
300
(V)30,
600
25 100 (H)360
2
440
100
2 700
300
600
440
100
5.5 2 5 2 700
300
600
1.7
2.9
5.5
1.65
2.4
2.72 5
25 300
2.9 Quanergy
1.7
2.9
Velodyne
5.5
1.65
2.42
Velodyne
2.7 5 2.9 M8-Core
1.7
RIEGL
Quanergy
1.7
VLP-16
Velodyne
5.5
1.65
2.4
VLP-32
Velodyne
2.7
Quanergy
RIEGL
M8-Core
Quanergy
M8-Core
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.65
VLP-32
VelodyneRIEGL
M8-Core
VLP-16
Velodyne VLP-16
VLP-32 * * ** *
Revolution
Surveyor Revolution
60 Revolution
Surveyor Revolution
SCOUT-32
Surveyor 60
Ultra
60
100
Surveyor 60100 360
100
200
100
360 100360
360 360 360 300 2 2 300 4.6
700
600
300 300 4.6
1.53 4.6 5 2 Velodyne
4.6
1.53
miniVUX-1UAV 2.4
2.7
1.53 PUCK
Velodyne
1.53
miniVUX-1UAV
miniVUX-1UAV
RIEGLRIEGL Velodyne PUCK
Velodyne
RIEGL
Velodyne VLP-32
miniVUX-1UAV
RIEGLRIEGL PUCK PUCK * * *
LiDARUSALiDARUSA
Phoenix LiDARUSA
Snoopy
Phoenix
LiDARUSA
LSSnoopy
SnoopyNano Vux
miniVUX LSSnoopy
A-series
Snoopy
Snoopy
PhoenixminiVUX Surveyor
Nano Vux
LSPhoenix
Nano
Snoopy
miniVUXLS
A-series 330
SnoopyNano
100
Vux
A-series
330
miniVUX 330 Vux
A-series 330
(V)40,
100
330 100
(H)360
360
(H)360
330
100
360
330
(V)41.33,
(H)360
330
360(V)40,
100360
(H)360
360 5225360
(H)360
(V)40,
(V)41.33, 360
360 (V)40,
(H)360 360
(H)360
360
(H)360
5 (V)41.33, 5225 100
300
100
700 2552 100 225 100
(V)41.33,
300
100300
700 100
700
10055 65 5 700 300
100 2.952.3
2.51
2.955 65 552.9 56
Velodyne
2.3
2.95
Velodyne
2.51
2.9 65 2.95
5 2.3
miniVUX-1UAV
VLP-16
Velodyne
2.3
2.95
2.9 VLP-32E
2.51 Velodyne
2.51 Velodyne VLP-16
Velodyne
VLP-16
VLP-32E
Velodyne
miniVUX-1UAV
Velodyne
VLP-32E
miniVUX-1UAV
VLP-16
VLP-32E
LiDAR SWISSLiDARLiDAR SWISS
M200 LiDAR
Revolution
SWISS
Series
SCOUT-16 SWISS
M200
SCOUT-16Revolution
60
Snoopy
M200Series M200
Revolution
SCOUT-16
SeriesRevolution
SCOUT-1660
Snoopy150
Series
60
100
Snoopy 100 60
Snoopy
(V)40,
150
(V)30,
100 360
(H)360
100
150
(V)30,
100 100
(V)40,
150
(V)30,360
(H)360
(V)40,
(H)360(V)30, 2 360 (V)40,
(H)360
(H)360
2 360
(H)360
2 440
3002 2 300 2 440
300 4.6
3002
5.5
440
300 5.5 300
440 4.6
1.53
1.7
2
5.5
1.65 4.6
2
5.5 1.65 Velodyne
4.6
1.53
miniVUX-1UAV
Quanergy
1.7
2
Velodyne
1.65 1.53
1.7 PUCK
Velodyne
1.53
M8-Core
Velodyne
1.65 Quanergy
1.7
VLP-16
Velodyne
miniVUX-1UAV miniVUX-1UAV
miniVUX-1UAV
Quanergy
VLP-16 PUCK
Velodyne
M8-Core
VelodyneQuanergy
VLP-16
miniVUX-1UAVPUCK
M8-Core
VLP-16 PUCK
M8-Core
Surveyor
SCOUT-32 Ultra
Surveyor
SCOUT-32
SurveyorUltra
Surveyor
200
SCOUT-32
100
Ultra Ultra 200360
SCOUT-32
100 200
(H)360
2003602360 1003602 700
100
(H)360 (H)360
600 2 2 700
(H)360 100
600600 25 600 2.4
2 700 2.725 5 700Velodyne 2.7
2.425 2.7 RIEGL VLP-32
Velodyne
2.7
2.4
2 Velodyne
RIEGL VLP-32
Velodyne
RIEGL2.4
VLP-32
RIEGLVLP-32 ** * ** * * *
LiDARUSA
Phoenix
PhoenixLiDARUSA
Phoenix
M200
LiDARUSA Surveyor
Snoopy miniVUX
LiDARUSA
Series
SCOUT-16
Snoopy
Phoenix Snoopy
M200
Snoopy
A-series
SCOUT-16 Surveyor
miniVUX
SCOUT-16
Snoopy
M200 Snoopy
Surveyor
Snoopy
Series
A-series 100
Surveyor
330
miniVUX
M200
Snoopy150
Snoopy
Series
SCOUT-16
Snoopy 100
Snoopy
A-series miniVUX
Series
100 Snoopy100
330
(V)40,
150
(V)30,
A-series 100 360
100
330
(H)360
150
(V)41.33,
(V)30,
100
100 100
330
(V)40,
150
(V)30,
100360
(H)360
(V)40,
(V)41.33,
(H)360(V)30, 2522360360 2 360
(V)40,
(H)360
(H)360 2522 440
(H)360 300
100
300
70022252 300 2522 440 300
300
700 300256 5.5 440
100
5.5
440
300
700 300 5.5
100
700 2.3
2.9
256 5.5
1.7
1.65
2.51 2651.65
5 Velodyne
2.3
2.9
256 Velodyne
Quanergy
1.7
Velodyne
1.65
Velodyne
2.51 2.3
1.7
1.65
2.51 VLP-16
Velodyne
2.3
2.9
2.9 VLP-32E
M8-Core
Quanergy
1.7
VLP-16
Velodyne
Velodyne
2.51 Velodyne
Quanergy
VLP-16 VLP-16
Velodyne
VLP-16
M8-Core
Quanergy
VLP-16
VLP-32E
Velodyne
Velodyne Velodyne VLP-16
M8-Core
VLP-16VLP-32E
M8-Core
VLP-32E
Revolution Revolution
60 RevolutionRevolution
60 100
60 60100 (V)41.33,
360
100 100 (V)41.33,
360 360 360 300 300 4.6
300 300 4.6
1.53 4.6 Velodyne
4.6
1.53
miniVUX-1UAV
1.53 PUCK
Velodyne
1.53
miniVUX-1UAV
VelodynePUCK
Velodyne
miniVUX-1UAV
miniVUX-1UAVPUCK PUCK * * * *
SCOUT-32
SCOUT-32 SCOUT-32
SCOUT-32 100
200 100 100 100 22 2 36022 700 700 25 2 600 2.4 25 2.4 2.4
LiDARUSA
Phoenix LiDARUSA
Phoenix Surveyor
LiDARUSA
SnoopyLiDARUSAUltra
Surveyor
A-series
SnoopySurveyorUltra
Surveyor
A-seriesUltra
Snoopy
100 Ultra
A-series 200
(V)40,
100 360
200
(H)360
(H)360 200360
(H)360
(V)40,
100 (H)360 360 600 22 700 22 700 600700 700
600 2.7 6 65
2 Velodyne
2.7 5 2.7 2.4 VLP-32
Velodyne
2.7 Velodyne VLP-32
Velodyne
VLP-32 VLP-32 * * * *
Phoenix Phoenix
M200
SnoopySeries
SCOUT-16 M200
Snoopy
miniVUX
SCOUT-32
Snoopy
M200
Snoopy Series
SCOUT-16 A-series
M200
Snoopy
Series
SCOUT-16
miniVUX
SCOUT-32
Snoopy 150
Series
SCOUT-16
100
Snoopy
Snoopy330
100
miniVUX Snoopy
miniVUX
(V)41.33,
(V)40,
150
(V)30,
100
330360
100
100
150(H)360
(V)41.33,
(H)360
100
330
(V)41.33,
(V)40,
(V)40,
150
(V)30,
100
(V)40,
(V)30,
330360 252360
(H)360
(V)41.33,
(H)3602
(V)40,
(H)360
(V)40,
(V)30,
(H)360
(H)360
(H)360
360 252 440
(H)360
2
700
300
100
70025222 700 25 440 300440
100
700 22
5.5
300
100
6
5 2 440
700
300 5.5
100
2.51
1.7
22
1.65
2.9
2.45 5.5 252.4
Velodyne
2.51
256 2.51
Quanergy
1.7
Velodyne
5.5
1.65
2.9
2.4
RIEGL
1.7
1.65
2.9
VLP-32E
Velodyne
2.51
M8-Core
Quanergy
1.7
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.65
2.9
RIEGL
Quanergy
VLP-32E
Velodyne
Velodyne
RIEGL
VelodyneM8-Core
Quanergy
VLP-16
VelodyneRIEGL
VLP-32E
M8-Core
VLP-32E
VLP-16M8-Core
VLP-16 ** * ** ** *
SCOUT-32
Revolution SCOUT-32
Revolution
60 60
Revolution 60 100 100
Revolution 60100 100
360
100 100360 2360 2 360 2 300 2 2 300 700
4.6
300 300 4.6
1.53 4.6 2 Velodyne
4.6
1.53
miniVUX-1UAV 2.4
1.53 PUCK
Velodyne
1.53
miniVUX-1UAV
VelodynePUCK
Velodyne
miniVUX-1UAV
PUCK PUCK
LiDARUSA
Phoenix LiDARUSA
Phoenix
LiDARUSA
SnoopyLiDARUSA
Phoenix
A-series
Snoopy A-series
Snoopy
100 A-series (H)360
(V)40,
100 (H)360
(H)360 (H)360
(V)40,
100 (H)360
(H)360 RIEGL miniVUX-1UAV
RIEGL
RIEGL RIEGL
Phoenix
Snoopy miniVUX
SnoopySnoopy
Snoopy A-series
miniVUX
Snoopy330 miniVUX
miniVUX (V)41.33,
330 100
360
330 (V)41.33,
(V)40,
330360 52360
(V)41.33, (V)40,
(H)360 (H)360
(V)41.33,
360 52 100700 52 52 100
700100
700 56 700 2.51
100 2.956 56 Velodyne
2.51
2.956 2.51
2.9 VLP-32E
Velodyne
2.51
2.9 VelodyneVLP-32E
Velodyne
VLP-32EVLP-32E
SCOUT-32
M200SCOUT-16
SeriesM200 SCOUT-32
Snoopy
M200Series M200
SCOUT-32
SCOUT-16
Series
SCOUT-16 SCOUT-32
Snoopy100
150
Series Snoopy
SCOUT-16
Snoopy 100
(V)40,
150150
(V)30, (H)360
100
100 100
(V)40,
150
(V)30, (H)360
(V)40,
(V)30, 2 (H)360 (V)40,
(V)30, (H)360 2 440 700
30022 2 440700
300440 2
700
5.5
300 700
440
300 5.5 2.4
1.7
2 5.5
1.65 22 2.4
miniVUX-1UAV
Quanergy
1.7
2 1.65
Velodyne
5.5
1.65 1.7 2.4
miniVUX-1UAV
2.4 M8-Core
Quanergy
1.7
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.65 Quanergy
Velodyne miniVUX-1UAV
M8-Core
Quanergy
VLP-16
Velodyne
miniVUX-1UAVM8-Core
VLP-16 M8-Core
VLP-16 ** ** ** **
(H)360 (H)360(H)360 (H)360 RIEGL RIEGL
RIEGL RIEGL
LiDARUSA
Phoenix LiDARUSA Snoopy
Phoenix
LiDARUSA
Snoopy miniVUX
LiDARUSA
SCOUT-16
Phoenix Snoopy
Phoenix
A-series Snoopy
Snoopy miniVUX
SCOUT-16
Snoopy Snoopy330
miniVUX
A-series
Snoopy
100 miniVUX
A-series
SCOUT-16
A-series
SCOUT-16 330
(V)40,
100
(V)30, 360
330
(H)360
100 330
(V)40,
100
(V)30,360
(H)360
(V)40,
(V)41.33, (V)41.33,
(V)30, 52 360 (V)40,
(V)30,
(H)360 360
(H)36052 100
700
300 52 52 100
700
300 100
5.5
700 5 6 100
700
300 2.9
2.51
5.5
1.655 6 56 2.95
Velodyne
2.51 6
Velodyne
5.5
1.65 2.9
2.51 2.9
VLP-32E
Velodyne
2.51
VLP-16
Velodyne
1.65 VelodyneVLP-32E
Velodyne
VLP-16
Velodyne VLP-32E
VLP-16 VLP-16
VLP-32E
(V)41.33,(V)41.33, 300 5.5 1.65 miniVUX-1UAV
miniVUX-1UAV Velodyne miniVUX-1UAV
miniVUX-1UAV * * * *
SCOUT-32 SCOUT-32 SCOUT-32
100 100100 100 2 2 700 2 700700 2 700 2.4 2 2 2.42 2.4 2.4
Phoenix Phoenix Phoenix Phoenix SCOUT-32 (H)360
(V)41.33, (H)360
(V)41.33,
(H)360
(V)41.33, (H)360
(V)41.33,
2 RIEGL RIEGL
RIEGL RIEGL * * * *
SCOUT-16 SCOUT-16 SCOUT-16 100 (V)30,
100 (H)360 (V)30,
100 (H)360 2 (V)30, (H)360 2 300 2 300 5.5 300 5.51.65 Velodyne
5.5
1.65 VLP-16
Velodyne
1.65 VLP-16
Velodyne VLP-16
Drones 2020, 4, 046 22 of 28

References
1. Gojda, M. The Contribution of Aerial Archaeology to European Landscape Studies: Past Achievements,
Recent Developments and Future Perspectives. J. Eur. Archaeol. 1997, 5, 91–104. [CrossRef]
2. Bewley, R.H. Aerial survey for archaeology. Photogramm. Rec. 2003, 18, 273–292. [CrossRef]
3. Ceraudo, G. Aerial Photography in Archaeology. In Good Practice in Archaeological Diagnostics; Corsi, C.,
Slapšak, B., Vermeulen, F., Eds.; Natural Science in Archaeology; Springer International Publishing:
Cham, Switzerland, 2013; pp. 11–30. ISBN 978-3-319-01783-9.
4. Ciminale, M.; Becker, H.; Gallo, D. Integrated technologies for archaeological investigation; the Celone Valley
project. Archaeol. Prospect. 2007, 14, 167–181. [CrossRef]
5. Campana, S.; Dabas, M.; Marasco, L.; Piro, S.; Zamuner, D. Integration of remote sensing, geophysical
surveys and archaeological excavation for the study of a medieval mound (Tuscany, Italy). Archaeol. Prospect.
2009, 16, 167–176. [CrossRef]
6. Sarris, A.; Papadopoulos, N.; Agapiou, A.; Salvi, M.C.; Hadjimitsis, D.G.; Parkinson, W.A.; Yerkes, R.W.;
Gyucha, A.; Duffy, P.R. Integration of geophysical surveys, ground hyperspectral measurements, aerial and
satellite imagery for archaeological prospection of prehistoric sites: The case study of Vésztő-Mágor Tell,
Hungary. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2013, 40, 1454–1470. [CrossRef]
7. Caspari, G.; Sadykov, T.; Blochin, J.; Buess, M.; Nieberle, M.; Balz, T. Integrating Remote Sensing and
Geophysics for Exploring Early Nomadic Funerary Architecture in the “Siberian Valley of the Kings”. Sensors
2019, 19, 3074. [CrossRef]
8. Raczkowski,
˛ W. Aerial Archaeology. In Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology; Smith, C., Ed.; Springer: New York,
NY, USA, 2014; pp. 33–38. ISBN 978-1-4419-0426-3.
9. Raczkowski,
˛ W. Aerial Archaeology. In Field Archaeology from around the World; Carver, M.,
Gaydarska, B., Montón-Subías, S., Eds.; SpringerBriefs in Archaeology; Springer International Publishing:
Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 19–25. ISBN 978-3-319-09818-0.
10. Agapiou, A.; Hadjimitsis, D.G.; Sarris, A.; Georgopoulos, A.; Alexakis, D.D. Optimum temporal and spectral
window for monitoring crop marks over archaeological remains in the Mediterranean region. J. Archaeol. Sci.
2013, 40, 1479–1492. [CrossRef]
11. Neubauer, W. Images of the invisible-prospection methods for the documentation of threatened archaeological
sites. Naturwissenschaften 2001, 88, 13–24. [CrossRef]
12. Beck, A.R. Archaeological Site Detection: The Importance of Contrast; Curran Associates, Inc.: Newcastle Upon
Tyne, UK, 2008; pp. 307–312.
13. Perisset, M.C.; Tabbagh, A. Interpretation of thermal contrast on bare soils. Archaeometry 1981, 23, 169–187.
[CrossRef]
14. Devereux, B.J.; Amable, G.S.; Crow, P. Visualisation of LiDAR terrain models for archaeological feature
detection. Antiquity 2008, 82, 470–479. [CrossRef]
15. Challis, K.; Kokalj, Z.; Kincey, M.; Moscrop, D.; Howard, A.J. Airborne lidar and historic environment records.
Antiquity 2008, 82, 1055–1064. [CrossRef]
16. Devereux, B.J.; Amable, G.S.; Crow, P.; Cliff, A.D. The potential of airborne lidar for detection of archaeological
features under woodland canopies. Antiquity 2005, 79, 648–660. [CrossRef]
17. Chase, A.S.Z.; Chase, D.Z.; Chase, A.F. LiDAR for Archaeological Research and the Study of Historical
Landscapes. In Sensing the Past; Masini, N., Soldovieri, F., Eds.; Geotechnologies and the Environment;
Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; Volume 16, pp. 89–100. ISBN 978-3-319-50516-9.
18. Bennett, R.; Welham, K.; Hill, R.A.; Ford, A. A Comparison of Visualization Techniques for Models
Created from Airborne Laser Scanned Data: A Comparison of Visualization Techniques for ALS Data.
Archaeol. Prospect. 2012, 19, 41–48. [CrossRef]
19. Štular, B.; Kokalj, Ž.; Oštir, K.; Nuninger, L. Visualization of lidar-derived relief models for detection of
archaeological features. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2012, 39, 3354–3360. [CrossRef]
20. Parcak, S.H. Satellite Remote Sensing for Archaeology; Routledge: London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2009;
pp. 52–103. ISBN 978-0-415-44877-2.
21. Leisz, S.J. An Overview of the Application of Remote Sensing to Archaeology during the Twentieth Century.
In Mapping Archaeological Landscapes from Space; SpringerBriefs in Archaeology; Springer: New York, NY,
USA, 2013; Volume 5, pp. 11–19. ISBN 978-1-4614-6073-2.
Drones 2020, 4, 046 23 of 28

22. Comer, D.C. Aerial and Satellite Remote Sensing in Archaeology. In Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology;
Smith, C., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 29–32. ISBN 978-1-4419-0426-3.
23. Kalayci, T.; Lasaponara, R.; Wainwright, J.; Masini, N. Multispectral Contrast of Archaeological Features:
A Quantitative Evaluation. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 913. [CrossRef]
24. Lambers, K. Airborne and Spaceborne Remote Sensing and Digital Image Analysis in Archaeology. In Digital
Geoarchaeology; Siart, C., Forbriger, M., Bubenzer, O., Eds.; Natural Science in Archaeology; Springer
International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 109–122. ISBN 978-3-319-25314-5.
25. Winterbottom, S.J.; Dawson, T. Airborne multi-spectral prospection for buried archaeology in mobile sand
dominated systems. Archaeol. Prospect. 2005, 12, 205–219. [CrossRef]
26. Rowlands, A.; Sarris, A. Detection of exposed and subsurface archaeological remains using multi-sensor
remote sensing. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2007, 34, 795–803. [CrossRef]
27. Aqdus, S.A.; Hanson, W.S.; Drummond, J. Finding Archaeological Cropmarks: A Hyperspectral Approach.
In Remote Sensing for Environmental Monitoring, GIS Applications, and Geology VII (Vol. 6749); Ehlers, M.,
Michel, U., Eds.; SPIE: Florence, Italy, 2007.
28. Scollar, I. Archaeological Prospecting and Remote Sensing. In Topics in Remote Sensing; Cambridge University
Press: Cambridge, UK, 1990; pp. 591–633. ISBN 978-0-521-32050-4.
29. Cool, A.C. Thermography. In The Encyclopedia of Archaeological Sciences; Varela, S.L., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons,
Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 1–5. ISBN 978-0-470-67461-1.
30. Palombo, A.; Pascucci, S.; Pergola, N.; Pignatti, S.; Santini, F.; Soldovieri, F. Multispectral Thermal Airborne
TASI-600 Data to Study the Pompeii (IT) Archaeological Area; Copernicus Publications: Vienna, Austria, 2016;
pp. 17–22.
31. Pignatti, S.; Palombo, A.; Pascucci, S.; Santini, F.; Laneve, G. Survey of the Pompeii (IT) Archaeological Regions
with the Multi-Spectral Thermal Airborne TASI Data; Copernicus Publications: Vienna, Austria, 2017; pp. 23–28.
32. Savage, S.H.; Levy, T.E.; Jones, I.W. Prospects and problems in the use of hyperspectral imagery for
archaeological remote sensing: A case study from the Faynan copper mining district, Jordan. J. Archaeol. Sci.
2012, 39, 407–420. [CrossRef]
33. Opitz, R.; Herrmann, J. Recent Trends and Long-standing Problems in Archaeological Remote Sensing.
J. Comput. Appl. Archaeol. 2018, 1, 19–41. [CrossRef]
34. Schlitz, M. A review of low-level aerial archaeology and its application in Australia. Aust. Archaeol. 2004, 59,
51–58. [CrossRef]
35. Verhoeven, G.J.J. Providing an archaeological bird’s-eye view—An overall picture of ground-based means
to execute low-altitude aerial photography (LAAP) in Archaeology. Archaeol. Prospect. 2009, 16, 233–249.
[CrossRef]
36. Martínez-del-Pozo, J.-Á.; Cerrillo-Cuenca, E.; Salas-Tovar, E. Low Altitude Aerial Photography Applications
for Digital Surface Models Creation in Archaeology: Low Altitude Aerial Photography Applications.
Trans. GIS 2013, 17, 227–246. [CrossRef]
37. Vilbig, J.M.; Sagan, V.; Bodine, C. Archaeological surveying with airborne LiDAR and UAV photogrammetry:
A comparative analysis at Cahokia Mounds. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2020, 33, 102509. [CrossRef]
38. Barba, S.; Barbarella, M.; Di Benedetto, A.; Fiani, M.; Limongiello, M. Quality assessment of UAV
photogrammetric archaeological. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2019, XLII-2/W9, 93–100.
[CrossRef]
39. Hill, A.C. Economical drone mapping for archaeology: Comparisons of efficiency and accuracy.
J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2019, 24, 80–91. [CrossRef]
40. Pajares, G. Overview and Current Status of Remote Sensing Applications Based on Unmanned Aerial
Vehicles (UAVs). Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2015, 81, 281–330. [CrossRef]
41. Campana, S. Drones in Archaeology. State-of-the-art and Future Perspectives: Drones in Archaeology.
Archaeol. Prospect. 2017, 24, 275–296. [CrossRef]
42. Searcy, M.T. Drones. In The Encyclopedia of Archaeological Sciences; Varela, S.L., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.:
Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 1–3. ISBN 978-0-470-67461-1.
43. Themistocleous, K. Themistocleous, K. The Use of UAVs for Cultural Heritage and Archaeology. In Remote
Sensing for Archaeology and Cultural Landscapes; Hadjimitsis, D.G., Themistocleous, K., Cuca, B., Agapiou, A.,
Lysandrou, V., Lasaponara, R., Masini, N., Schreier, G., Eds.; Springer Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry;
Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 241–269. ISBN 978-3-030-10978-3.
Drones 2020, 4, 046 24 of 28

44. Gojda, M. Current Development in Archaeological Remote Sensing: A Central European Experience and
Evaluation. Interdiscip. Archaeol.-Nat. Sci. Archaeol. 2019, X, 155–164. [CrossRef]
45. Luo, L.; Wang, X.; Guo, H.; Lasaponara, R.; Zong, X.; Masini, N.; Wang, G.; Shi, P.; Khatteli, H.; Chen, F.; et al.
Airborne and spaceborne remote sensing for archaeological and cultural heritage applications: A review of
the century (1907–2017). Remote Sens. Environ. 2019, 232, 111280. [CrossRef]
46. Waagen, J. New technology and archaeological practice. Improving the primary archaeological recording
process in excavation by means of UAS photogrammetry. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2019, 101, 11–20. [CrossRef]
47. López, J.; Mulero-Pázmány, M. Drones for Conservation in Protected Areas: Present and Future. Drones
2019, 3, 10. [CrossRef]
48. Singh, K.K.; Frazier, A.E. A meta-analysis and review of unmanned aircraft system (UAS) imagery for
terrestrial applications. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2018, 39, 5078–5098. [CrossRef]
49. Adamopoulos, E.; Rinaudo, F. Enhancing Image-Based Multiscale Heritage Recording with Near-Infrared
Data. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020, 9, 269. [CrossRef]
50. Agudo, P.; Pajas, J.; Pérez-Cabello, F.; Redón, J.; Lebrón, B. The Potential of Drones and Sensors to Enhance
Detection of Archaeological Cropmarks: A Comparative Study between Multi-Spectral and Thermal Imagery.
Drones 2018, 2, 29. [CrossRef]
51. Barazzetti, L.; Brumana, R.; Oreni, D.; Cuca, B.; Previtali, M.; Roncoroni, F. Finding Buried Remains Using
Thermal Images. Int. J. Herit. Digit. Era 2015, 4, 295–306. [CrossRef]
52. Brooke, C.; Clutterbuck, B. Mapping Heterogeneous Buried Archaeological Features Using Multisensor Data
from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Remote Sens. 2019, 12, 41. [CrossRef]
53. Brumana, R.; Oreni, D.; Van Hecke, L.; Barazzetti, L.; Previtali, M.; Roncoroni, F.; Valente, R.
Combined geometric and thermal analysis from UAV platforms for archaeological heritage documenation.
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2013, II-5/W1, 49–54. [CrossRef]
54. Calleja, J.F.; Pagés, O.R.; Díaz-Álvarez, N.; Peón, J.; Gutiérrez, N.; Martín-Hernández, E.; Relea, A.C.;
Melendi, D.R.; Álvarez, P.F. Detection of buried archaeological remains with the combined use of satellite
multispectral data and UAV data. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2018, 73, 555–573. [CrossRef]
55. Casana, J.; Kantner, J.; Wiewel, A.; Cothren, J. Archaeological aerial thermography: A case study at the
Chaco-era Blue J community, New Mexico. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2014, 45, 207–219. [CrossRef]
56. Casana, J.; Wiewel, A.; Cool, A.; Hill, A.C.; Fisher, K.D.; Laugier, E.J. Archaeological Aerial Thermography in
Theory and Practice. Adv. Archaeol. Pr. 2017, 5, 310–327. [CrossRef]
57. Casella, V.; Franzini, M.; Gorrini, M.E. Crop marks detection through optical and multi-spectral
imagery acquired by UAV. In Proceedings of the 2018 Metrology for Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
(MetroArchaeo), Cassino, Italy, 22–24 October 2018; pp. 173–177.
58. Chelmus, A.; Radvan, R.; Angheluta, L. Aerial Investigations Corroboration for Archaeology and Monuments.
In Proceedings of the 2018 11th International Conference on Developments in eSystems Engineering (DeSE),
Cambridge, UK, 2–5 September 2018; pp. 113–116.
59. Colombatti, G.; Aboudan, A.; Bettanini, C.; Magnini, L.; Bettineschi, C.; Deotto, G.; Toninello, L.; Debei, S.;
Guio, A.D.; Zanovello, P.; et al. Horus—A drone project for visual and IR imaging. In Proceedings of the 2017
IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for AeroSpace (MetroAeroSpace), Padua, Italy, 21–23 June 2017;
pp. 589–592.
60. Cowley, D.; Moriarty, C.; Geddes, G.; Brown, G.; Wade, T.; Nichol, C. UAVs in Context: Archaeological
Airborne Recording in a National Body of Survey and Record. Drones 2017, 2, 2. [CrossRef]
61. De Reu, J.; Trachet, J.; Laloo, P.; De Clercq, W. From Low Cost UAV Survey to High Resolution Topographic
Data: Developing our Understanding of a Medieval Outport of Bruges: From Low Cost UAV Survey to
High Resolution Topographic Data. Archaeol. Prospect. 2016, 23, 335–346. [CrossRef]
62. Evers, R.; Masters, P. The application of low-altitude near-infrared aerial photography for detecting
clandestine burials using a UAV and low-cost unmodified digital camera. Forensic Sci. Int. 2018, 289, 408–418.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
63. Faltýnová, M.; Pavelka, K.; Nový, P.; Šedina, J. Complex Archaeological Prospection Using Combination of
Non-destructive Techniques. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2015, XL-5/W7, 141–146.
[CrossRef]
Drones 2020, 4, 046 25 of 28

64. Fenger-Nielsen, R.; Hollesen, J.; Matthiesen, H.; Andersen, E.A.S.; Westergaard-Nielsen, A.; Harmsen, H.;
Michelsen, A.; Elberling, B. Footprints from the past: The influence of past human activities on vegetation
and soil across five archaeological sites in Greenland. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 654, 895–905. [CrossRef]
65. Fernández-Lozano, J.; Gutiérrez-Alonso, G. Improving archaeological prospection using localized UAVs
assisted photogrammetry: An example from the Roman Gold District of the Eria River Valley (NW Spain).
J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2016, 5, 509–520. [CrossRef]
66. González, J.F.; Hernández, F.V. NDVI Identification and Survey of a Roman Road in the Northern Spanish
Province of Álava. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 725. [CrossRef]
67. Garzia, F.; Lombardi, M.; Papi, L. Analysis and data acquisition methodology based on flying
drones for the implementation of the internet of everything to smart archaeological areas.
Int. J. Herit. Arch. Stud. Repairs Maintence 2017, 2, 383–394. [CrossRef]
68. Gehrke, R.; Greiwe, A. RGBI images with UAV and off-the-shelf compact cameras: An investigation of linear
sensor characteristics. EARSel eProc. 2014, 13, 53–58.
69. Gini, R.; Passoni, D.; Pinto, L.; Sona, G.; Pulejo, S.; Baracani, M. UAV-Based Images for a Documentation and
Active Fruition of the Natural and Cultural Heritage. Boll. AIC 2012, 144, 167–181.
70. González, J.J.F.; González, J.I.F. Prospección arqueológica en NDVI con drones. El uso de geoEuskadi como
herramienta de ponderación de un nuevo método. Rev. Mapp. 2018, 29, 24–29.
71. Hill, A.C.; Laugier, E.J.; Casana, J. Archaeological Remote Sensing Using Multi-Temporal, Drone-Acquired
Thermal and Near Infrared (NIR) Imagery: A Case Study at the Enfield Shaker Village, New Hampshire.
Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 690. [CrossRef]
72. Hill, A.C.; Rowan, Y.; Kersel, M.M. Mapping with Aerial Photographs: Recording the Past, the Present,
and the Invisible at Marj Rabba, Israel. Near East. Archaeol. 2014, 77, 182–186. [CrossRef]
73. Khan, S.; Aragão, L.; Iriarte, J. A UAV–lidar system to map Amazonian rainforest and its ancient landscape
transformations. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2017, 38, 2313–2330. [CrossRef]
74. Korczyńska, M.; Cappenberg, K.; Nowak, M.; Szwarczewski, P.; Hoyo, M.M. Multi-methodological
approaches to investigate large archaeological sites: The case study of the Eneolithic settlement in Mozgawa,
western Lesser Poland. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2019, 27, 101941. [CrossRef]
75. Koucká, L.; Kopačková, V.; Fárová, K.; Gojda, M. UAV Mapping of an Archaeological Site Using RGB and
NIR High-Resolution Data. Proceedings 2018, 2, 351. [CrossRef]
76. Lehmann, J.R.K.; Smithson, K.Z.; Prinz, T. Making the invisible visible: Using UAS-based high-resolution
color-infrared imagery to identify buried medieval monastery walls. J. Unmanned Veh. Syst. 2015, 3, 58–67.
[CrossRef]
77. Levin, S.; Yuan, M.; Adler, M. Thermographic Quantification for Archaeological Prospection at Picuris Pueblo,
New Mexico. In Proceedings of the 2018 3rd Digital Heritage International Congress (DigitalHERITAGE)
held jointly with 2018 24th International Conference on Virtual Systems & Multimedia (VSMM 2018),
San Francisco, CA, USA, 26–30 October 2018; pp. 1–8.
78. Liu, C.; Cao, Y.; Yang, C.; Zhou, Y.; Ai, M. Pattern identification and analysis for the traditional village
using low altitude UAV-borne remote sensing: Multifeatured geospatial data to support rural landscape
investigation, documentation and management. J. Cult. Herit. 2020, 44, 185–195. [CrossRef]
79. Magnini, L.; Bettineschi, C.; De Guio, A.; Burigana, L.; Colombatti, G.; Bettanini, C.; Aboudan, A.
Multisensor-multiscale approach in studying the proto-historic settlement of Bostel in northern Italy.
Archeol. Calc. 2019, 30, 347–365. [CrossRef]
80. Malinverni, E.S.; Barbaro, C.C.; Pierdicca, R.; Bozzi, C.A.; Tassetti, A.N. UAV Surveying for a
complete mapping and documentation of archaeological findings. The early neolithic site of Portonovo.
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2016, XLI-B1, 1149–1155. [CrossRef]
81. Masini, N.; Marzo, C.; Manzari, P.; Belmonte, A.; Sabia, C.; Lasaponara, R. On the characterization of temporal
and spatial patterns of archaeological crop-marks. J. Cult. Herit. 2018, 32, 124–132. [CrossRef]
82. Mather, A.; Fyfe, R.; Clason, C.; Stokes, M.; Mills, S.; Barrows, T. Automated mapping of relict patterned
ground: An approach to evaluate morphologically subdued landforms using unmanned-aerial-vehicle and
structure-from-motion technologies. Prog. Phys. Geogr. Earth Environ. 2019, 43, 174–192. [CrossRef]
83. Matoušková, E.; Starková, L.; Pavelka, K.; Nováček, K.; Šedina, J.; Faltýnová, M.; Housarová, E. Using remote
sensing data for documentation of archaeological sites in northwestern Mesopotamia. Int. Arch. Photogramm.
Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2016, XLI-B5, 335–342. [CrossRef]
Drones 2020, 4, 046 26 of 28

84. McLeester, M.; Casana, J.; Schurr, M.R.; Hill, A.C.; Wheeler, J.H. Detecting prehistoric landscape features
using thermal, multi-spectral, and historical imagery analysis at Midewin National Tallgrass Prairie, Illinois.
J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2018, 21, 450–459. [CrossRef]
85. Ramón, A.G.M.; Barba, L.; Ortiz, A.; Blancas, J. Geophysical prospection at the formative site of Altica in the
Teotihacan Valley Piedmont. Anc. Mesoam. 2019, 30, 267–278. [CrossRef]
86. Moriarty, C.; Cowley, D.C.; Wade, T.; Nichol, C.J. Deploying multi-spectral remote sensing for multi-temporal
analysis of archaeological crop stress at Ravenshall, Fife, Scotland. Archaeol. Prospect. 2019, 26, 33–46.
[CrossRef]
87. Murtha, T.M.; Broadbent, E.N.; Golden, C.; Scherer, A.; Schroder, W.; Wilkinson, B.; Zambrano, A.A.
Drone-Mounted Lidar Survey of Maya Settlement and Landscape. Lat. Am. Antiq. 2019, 30, 630–636.
[CrossRef]
88. O’Driscoll, J. Landscape applications of photogrammetry using unmanned aerial vehicles.
J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2018, 22, 32–44. [CrossRef]
89. Parisi, E.I.; Suma, M.; Güleç Korumaz, A.; Rosina, E.; Tucci, G. Aerial platforms (UAV) surveys in the VIS and
TIR range. Applications on archaeology and agriculture. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci.
2019, XLII-2/W11, 945–952. [CrossRef]
90. Pavelka, K.; Šedina, J.; Matoušková, E. High Resolution Drone Surveying of the Pista Geoglyph in Palpa,
Peru. Geosciences 2018, 8, 479. [CrossRef]
91. González, M.E.P.; Revilla, J.I.G. A new environmental and spatial approach to the Tiwanaku World Heritage
site (Bolivia) using remote sensing (UAV and satellite images). Geoarchaeology 2020, 35, 416–429. [CrossRef]
92. Pisz, M.; Tomas, A.; Hegyi, A. Non-destructive research in the surroundings of the Roman Fort Tibiscum
(today Romania). Archaeol. Prospect. 2020. [CrossRef]
93. Poirier, N. From Archaeological Evidence for Agricultural Manuring to an Understanding of Settlement and
Landscape Dynamics—An Experiment in Non-Invasive Archaeological Methods Undertaken in South-West
France. In Materialien zur Bodendenkmalpflege im Rheinland 26; Keller, C., Wohlfarth, C., Eds.; LVR-Amt für
Bodendenkmalpflege im Rheinland: Cologne, Germany, 2018; pp. 41–58.
94. Poirier, N.; Hautefeuille, F.; Calastrenc, C. Low Altitude Thermal Survey by Means of an Automated
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for the Detection of Archaeological Buried Structures: Thermal Archaeological
Survey by Automated Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. Archaeol. Prospect. 2013, 20, 303–307. [CrossRef]
95. Poirier, N.; Hautefeuille, F.; Calastrenc, C. L’utilisation des micro-drones pour la prospection archéologique à
basse altitude. Rev. Fr. Photogramm. Télédétect. 2017, 213, 81–94.
96. Poscetti, V.; Malatesta, S.G.; Cirilli, V.; Lella, F.; Rondinelli, V.; Esposito, S.; Balsi, M. Preliminary results of the
Castelmonardo Project. Archeol. Calc. 2017, 28, 391–402. [CrossRef]
97. Raeva, P.; Pavelka, K.; Hanuš, J.; Gojda, M. Using of both hyperspectral aerial sensing and RPAS multi-spectral
sensing for potential archaeological sites detection. In Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Ultraspectral Remote
Sensing Technology, Techniques and Applications VII; Larar, A.M., Suzuki, M., Wang, J., Eds.; SPIE: Honolulu,
HI, USA, 2018; p. 47.
98. Risbøl, O.; Gustavsen, L. LiDAR from drones employed for mapping archaeology—Potential, benefits and
challenges. Archaeol. Prospect. 2018, 25, 329–338. [CrossRef]
99. Carmona, J.Á.S.; Quirós, E.; Mayoral, V.; Charro, C. Assessing the potential of multi-spectral and thermal
UAV imagery from archaeological sites. A case study from the Iron Age hillfort of Villasviejas del Tamuja
(Cáceres, Spain). J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2020, 31, 102312. [CrossRef]
100. Saunaluoma, S.; Anttiroiko, N.; Moat, J. UAV survey at archaeological earthwork sites in the Brazilian state
of Acre, southwestern Amazonia. Archaeol. Prospect. 2019, 26, 325–331. [CrossRef]
101. Šedina, J.; Pavelka, K.; Housarová, E. Archaeological documentation of a defunct Iraqi town.
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2016, XLI-B1, 1031–1035. [CrossRef]
102. Šedina, J.; Housarová, E.; Matoušková, E. Documentation of Urn Graves of Knovíz Culture by RPAS.
Geoinformatics Fce Ctu 2016, 15, 71–82. [CrossRef]
103. Šedina, J.; Housarová, E.; Raeva, P. Using RPAS for the detection of archaeological objects using multi-spectral
and thermal imaging. Eur. J. Remote. Sens. 2019, 52, 182–191. [CrossRef]
104. Šedina, J.; Hůlková, M.; Pavelka, K.; Pavelka, K., Jr. RPAS for documentation of Nazca aqueducts.
Eur. J. Remote. Sens. 2019, 52, 174–181. [CrossRef]
Drones 2020, 4, 046 27 of 28

105. Šedina, J.; Pavelka, K.; Housarová, E. RPAS as a tool for mapping and other special work. In Advances
and Trends in Engineering Sciences and Technologies, Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering
Sciences and Technologies, Tatranská Štrba, Slovak Republic, 27–29 May 2015; Ali, M., Platko, P., Eds.; CRC Press:
Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2015; pp. 405–412. ISBN 978-1-138-02907-1.
106. Skarlatos, D.; Vlachos, M. Vegetation removal from UAV derived DSMs, using combination of RGB and NIR
imagery. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2018, IV-2, 255–262. [CrossRef]
107. Thomas, H. Some like it hot: The impact of next generation FLIR Systems thermal cameras on archaeological
thermography. Archaeol. Prospect. 2018, 25, 81–87. [CrossRef]
108. Thomas, H.; Williams, E. High resolution terrestrial thermography of archaeological sites. Archaeol. Prospect.
2019, 26, 189–198. [CrossRef]
109. Uribe, P.; Angás, J.; Pérez-Cabello, F. Aerial mapping and multi-sensor approaches from remote sensing
applied to the Roman Archaeological Heritage. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2015,
XL-5/W4, 461–467. [CrossRef]
110. VanValkenburgh, P.; Cushman, K.C.; Butters, L.J.C.; Vega, C.R.; Roberts, C.B.; Kepler, C.; Kellner, J. Lasers
Without Lost Cities: Using Drone Lidar to Capture Architectural Complexity at Kuelap, Amazonas, Peru.
J. Field Archaeol. 2020, 45, S75–S88. [CrossRef]
111. Walker, S. Low-altitude aerial thermography for the archaeological investigation of arctic landscapes.
J. Archaeol. Sci. 2020, 117, 105126. [CrossRef]
112. Zhou, W.; Chen, F.; Guo, H.; Hu, M.; Li, Q.; Tang, P.; Zheng, W.; Liu, J.; Luo, R.; Yan, K.; et al. UAV Laser
scanning technology: A potential cost-effective tool for micro-topography detection over wooded areas for
archaeological prospection. Int. J. Digit. Earth 2020, 1, 1–23. [CrossRef]
113. Sonnemann, T.; Hung, J.U.; Hofman, C. Mapping Indigenous Settlement Topography in the Caribbean Using
Drones. Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 791. [CrossRef]
114. Megarry, W.; Graham, C.; Gilhooly, B.; O’Neill, B.; Sands, R.; Nyland, A.; Cooney, G. Debitage and Drones:
Classifying and Characterising Neolithic Stone Tool Production in the Shetland Islands Using High Resolution
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Imagery. Drones 2018, 2, 12. [CrossRef]
115. Jorayev, G.; Wehr, K.; Benito-Calvo, A.; Njau, J.; de la Torre, I. Imaging and photogrammetry models of
Olduvai Gorge (Tanzania) by Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: A high-resolution digital database for research and
conservation of Early Stone Age sites. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2016, 75, 40–56. [CrossRef]
116. Parcero-Oubiña, C.; Fábrega-Álvarez, P.; Salazar, D.; Troncoso, A.; Hayashida, F.; Pino, M.; Borie, C.;
Echenique, E. Ground to air and back again: Archaeological prospection to characterize prehispanic
agricultural practices in the high-altitude Atacama (Chile). Quat. Int. 2017, 435, 98–113. [CrossRef]
117. Colomina, I.; Molina, P. Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: A review.
Isprs J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2014, 92, 79–97. [CrossRef]
118. Qi, S.; Wang, F.; Jing, L. Unmanned Aircraft System Pilot/Operator Qualification Requirements and Training
Study. Matec Web Conf. 2018, 179, 03006. [CrossRef]
119. Jeziorska, J. UAS for Wetland Mapping and Hydrological Modeling. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 1997. [CrossRef]
120. Forlani, G.; Dall’Asta, E.; Diotri, F.; di Cella, U.M.; Roncella, R.; Santise, M. Quality Assessment of DSMs
Produced from UAV Flights Georeferenced with On-Board RTK Positioning. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 311.
[CrossRef]
121. Tomaštík, J.; Mokroš, M.; Surový, P.; Grznárová, A.; Merganič, J. UAV RTK/PPK Method—An Optimal
Solution for Mapping Inaccessible Forested Areas? Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 721. [CrossRef]
122. Verhoeven, G.J. Near-Infrared Aerial Crop Mark Archaeology: From its Historical Use to Current Digital
Implementations. J. Archaeol. Method. Theory 2012, 19, 132–160. [CrossRef]
123. Aroma, R.J.; Raimond, K.; Razmjooy, N.; Estrela, V.V.; Hemanth, J. Multispectral vs hyperspectral imaging
for unmanned aerial vehicles: Current and prospective state of affairs. In Imaging and Sensing for
Unmanned Aircraft Systems: Volume 2: Deployment and Applications; Estrela, V.V., Hemanth, J., Saotome, O.,
Nikolakopoulos, G., Sabatini, R., Eds.; Institution of Engineering and Technology: London, UK, 2020;
pp. 133–155. ISBN 978-1-78561-644-0.
124. Linford, N. The application of geophysical methods to archaeological prospection. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2006, 69,
2205–2257. [CrossRef]
125. Gaffney, C. Detecting trends in the prediction of the buried past: A review of geophysical techniques in
archaeology. Archaeometry 2008, 50, 313–336. [CrossRef]
Drones 2020, 4, 046 28 of 28

126. Garcia-Fernandez, M.; Alvarez-Lopez, Y.; Heras, F.L.; Gonzalez-Valdes, B.; Rodriguez-Vaqueiro, Y.;
Pino, A.; Arboleya-Arboleya, A. GPR system on-board a UAV for non-invasive detection of buried objects.
In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation & USNC/URSI
National Radio Science Meeting, Boston, MA, USA, 8–13 July 2018; pp. 1967–1968.
127. Ludeno, G.; Catapano, I.; Renga, A.; Vetrella, A.R.; Fasano, G.; Soldovieri, F. Assessment of a micro-UAV
system for microwave tomography radar imaging. Remote Sens. Environ. 2018, 212, 90–102. [CrossRef]
128. Schartel, M.; Burr, R.; Mayer, W.; Docci, N.; Waldschmidt, C. UAV-Based Ground Penetrating Synthetic
Aperture Radar. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE MTT-S International Conference on Microwaves for
Intelligent Mobility (ICMIM), Munich, Germany, 16–18 April 2018; pp. 1–4.
129. Guyot, A.; Hubert-Moy, L.; Lorho, T. Detecting Neolithic Burial Mounds from LiDAR-Derived Elevation Data
Using a Multi-Scale Approach and Machine Learning Techniques. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 225. [CrossRef]
130. Soroush, M.; Mehrtash, A.; Khazraee, E.; Ur, J.A. Deep Learning in Archaeological Remote Sensing:
Automated Qanat Detection in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 500. [CrossRef]
131. Orengo, H.A.; Conesa, F.C.; Garcia-Molsosa, A.; Lobo, A.; Green, A.S.; Madella, M.; Petrie, C.A. Automated
detection of archaeological mounds using machine-learning classification of multisensor and multitemporal
satellite data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 18240–18250. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
132. Gould, R.A. Archaeological Survey by Air: A Case from the Australian Desert. J. Field Archaeol. 1987, 14,
431–443.
133. Zakharov, A.O. A View from the Highlands: Archaeology and Settlement History of West Sumatra, Indonesia,
by Mai Lin Tjoa-Bonatz. J. Malays. Branch R. Asiat. Soc. 2020, 93, 169–171. [CrossRef]
134. Oczipka, M.; Bemmann, J.; Piezonka, H.; Munkabayar, J.; Ahrens, B.; Achtelik, M.; Lehmann, F. Small
Drones for Geo-Archaeology in the Steppe: Locating and Documenting the Archaeological Heritage of the
Orkhon Valley in Mongolia. In Remote Sensing for Environmental Monitoring, GIS Applications, and Geology VII
(Vol. 6749); Michel, U., Civco, D.L., Eds.; SPIE: Berlin, Germany, 2009; p. 747806.
135. Rouse, L.M.; Krumnow, J. On the fly: Strategies for UAV-based archaeological survey in mountainous areas of
Central Asia and their implications for landscape research. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2020, 30, 102275. [CrossRef]

© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).