110 CC2 PPT
110 CC2 PPT
110 CC2 PPT
Prafull S. Lokhande
INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE, POONA'S
INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH
Results: Aug 22, 2022
68%
44% 50%
19% 27%
5%
-7%
Maize Rice Wheat Palm oil Crude oil Natural gas Fertilizers
Results: Aug 22, 2022
Undernourished
3,218
population increases
10,666
Detailed country-level results 7,866
by 22 million people
IFPRI website
AgriLinks 3,042
website
9,127
Diet quality deteriorates
for 50 million lower- and 38,265
middle-income people
Results: Aug 22, 2022
Poverty
Cash transfers are most cost-effective
(by design, they target the poor)
Hunger
Fertilizer options are often most effective
(offset declining food availability)
Diet deprivation
Food & fertilizer options are most effective
(increase overall food supply, and reduce
prices for the most-affected products)
Results: Aug 22, 2022
• Cash transfers, fertilizer use efficiency, and fertilizer supply chains Costing interventions
are usually more effective than food or fertilizer subsidies
• Governments in the model finance the interventions, but
• Cash transfers, like subsidies, generate large but temporary benefits we do not yet account for administrative/overhead costs
• Efforts to improve fertilizer efficiency take longer to implement, but may • Investments in fertilizer use efficiency and supply chains
have more lasting benefits are not fully costed (assumed to be mainly donor-financed)
• Having a balanced portfolio of policy responses is critical Falling prices since June 2022
• Recent declines in some world prices are not modeled
• i.e., combination of immediate and lasting investments designed to
address countries’ unique poverty and food security impacts • Food prices have returned to pre-crisis levels, and so we
may overstate the benefits of food tax relief
Compounding crises
• We do not (yet) model concurrent macroeconomic and
climate shocks facing many countries
Results: Aug 22, 2022
Acknowledgements
Funding: This research and seminar were made possible through support provided by the Office of Policy, Analysis and Engagement, Bureau for Resilience and Food Security, U.S. Agency
for International Development (USAID), under the terms of the Strengthen Evidence-based Policy Making in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean (IFPRI/ReSAKSS) Award # AID-BFS-
I0-17-00001 and the Policy, Evidence, Analytics, Research and Learning (PEARL) Award# 720RFS22IO00003. Joint funding was also received from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
(BMGF), the United Kingdom’s Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO), and the donor group funding the CGIAR’s Foresight and Metrics, and National Policies and Strategies
initiatives. The opinions expressed in this seminar are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of BMGF, CGIAR, FCDO or USAID.
Country researchers:
• Kibrom Abay (Egypt) • Edwin Ombui Oseko (Kenya)
• Fadi Abdelradi (Egypt) • Lensa Omune (Kenya)
• Kwaw Andam (Nigeria) • Karl Pauw (Cambodia, D.R. Congo, Egypt, Ghana, Malawi, Myanmar, Philippines, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia)
• Seth Asante (Ghana) • Josee Randriamamonjy (D.R. Congo, Egypt, Mali, Myanmar, Niger, Senegal)
• Gilberthe Benimana (Rwanda) • Pranav Patil (Ghana)
• Clemens Breisinger (Egypt, Kenya) • Angga Pradesha (Kenya, Nigeria, Philippines)
• Antony Chapoto (Zambia) • Mariam Raouf (Egypt)
• Jan Duchoslav (Malawi) • Gracie Rosenbach (Rwanda)
• Mia Ellis (Cambodia, Nepal, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia) • Jenny Smart (Nepal, Senegal)
• Mekamu Kedir Jemal (Ethiopia) • David Spielman (Rwanda)
• Kristi Mahrt (Myanmar) • Mitelo Subakanya (Zambia)
• Juneweenex Mbuthia (Kenya) • Hiroyuki Takeshima (Nepal)
• Bart Minten (Myanmar) • John Ulimwengu (D.R. Congo)
• Serge Mugabo (Rwanda)