Lab Report H3
Lab Report H3
Lab Report H3
Experiment Number: H3
Experiment Name: Thermal conduction in solid bodies.
H=KA ¿ ¿
Where,
H = heat transferred per unit time is known as the heat current.
K = Proportionality constant known as thermal conductivity of the
body
A = Area of the object
L = length of the object
∅ intial = Initial temperature
∅ final = Final temperature
∆θ = Difference in temperature
Where, K is a proportionality constant known as thermal
conductivity of the body.
The quantity H is the heat transferred per unit time is known as
the heat current.
Apparatus:
I. 1. Beaker
II. 2. Substance (Copper, Steel)
III. 3. Water (20ml)
IV. 4. Thermometer
V. 5. Meter rule
VI. 6. Spirit Burner
VII. 7. Vernier Caliper
VIII. 8. Stopwatc
IX. 1. Beaker
X. 2. Substance (Copper, Steel)
XI. 3. Water (20ml)
XII. 4. Thermometer
XIII. 5. Meter rule
XIV. 6. Spirit Burner
XV. 7. Vernier Caliper
XVI. 8. Stopwatc
XVII. 1. Beaker
XVIII. 2. Substance (Copper, Steel)
XIX. 3. Water (20ml)
XX. 4. Thermometer
XXI. 5. Meter rule
XXII. 6. Spirit Burner
XXIII. 7. Vernier Caliper
XIV. 8. Stopwatc
1. Beaker
2. Substance (Copper, Steel)
3. Water (20ml)
4. Thermometer
5. Meter rule
6. Spirit Burner
7. Vernier Caliper
8. Stopwatch
Time Rise in
Substanc t Temperatur Temperature Rise in
e (min) In Temperature per
e 5 min ∆θ
θ (°C)
unit time
∆∅
(°C) (∆ ∅= 5 )
(°C /min)
0 28
1.0 28.6 12.4 2.48
Copper 2.0 30.6
3.0 33.4
4.0 37.8
5.0 40.4
0 26.8
Steel 1.0 26.9
0.8 0.16
2.0 27
3.0 27.2
4.0 27.3
5.0 27.6
Table 2: Measurement of Copper radius
(Vernier Constant = 0.05 mm = 0.005 cm)
Radius of Copper
No Main Vernier Vernier
of Scale Scale scale Diamete Radius Average
reading r R = d/2 r
Obs. reading reading
V=bx0.005 D = a+v (cm) (cm)
a b (cm)
(cm) (cm)
1. 0.3 7.5×2=15 0.075 0.375 0.1875
2. 0.3 8 ×2=16 0.08 0.38 0.19 0.19
3. 0.3 8.5× 2=17 0.385 0.385 0.1925
Table 3: Measurement of Steel radius
(Vernier Constant = 0.05 mm = 0.005 cm)
Radius of Steel
No Main Vernier Vernier
of Scale Scale scale Diamete Radius Average
reading r R = d/2 r
Obs. reading reading
V=bx0.005 D = a+v (cm) (cm)
a b (cm)
(cm) (cm)
1. 0.4 9×2=18 0.09 0.49 0.195
2. 0.4 9×2=18 0.09 0.49 0.195 0.195
3. 0.4 9×2=18 0.09 0.49 0.195
Calculations:
Area of Copper, Ac = π r2
= 1.134 ×10 −5
m2
Length of Steel, L = 0.19 m s
Area of Steel, As = πr
2
= 1.95 ×10 −5
m2
For Copper:
Heat transferred per unit time,
Kc Ac ∆ ∅
H=
Lc
W
401 k ×1.134 ×10−5 m2 ×2.48
m
¿
0.2 m
¿ 56.3×10 −5
J /min
27.2
27
27 26.9
26.8
26.8
26.6
26.4
26.2
0 1 2 3 4 5
Time
For Steel:
Time vs Temperature for Steel
27.8
27.6
27.6
27.4 27.3
27.2
Temperature
27.2
27
27 26.9
26.8
26.8
26.6
26.4
26.2
0 1 2 3 4 5
Time
Result:
The heat transfer per unit time through copper is 56.3×10−5 J /min
Discussion:
The experiment was performed to investigate the conduction of heat in
Copper and Steel and calculate the rate of energy transfer through the
metals.
We know the factors which affect the heat loss by conduction are
Material Thermal Conductivity K, Surface area A, Temperature difference
and the length L of the material So in this experiment we put on two
different types of materials (steel and copper) with similar surface area
and length to the test.
At first, we take 20ml of water in a small beaker and dip one end of the
metal into the water such a way that it doesn’t come into contact with the
digital thermometer. Then, we will heat the other end of the metal using
spirit burner and note down the temperature at regular time intervals up till
5 minutes. Then we repeat the same experiment for another material and
tabulate the data as shown in Table: -1. After computing the average rise in
temperature per unit time and measuring the radius and length of the
materials using Vernier caliper and meter rule respectively, we were able to
use the equation and the known thermal conductivity table to calculate the
heat transfer per unit time through each material.
The results we found show that copper is a much better conductor of heat
than steel. The heat transfer per unit time through copper is 2.48 °C /min
and through steel is 0.16°C /min This huge difference is because
copper has a greater thermal conductivity than steel (Copper-401 W/m
k, steel- 14 W/m k). Copper also has a greater number of free electrons
which are responsible for carrying the energy.
The graph of time against temperature for steel and copper shows an
interesting fact that the time taken for the temperature to rise by 1 is
approximately same for both materials.
Conclusion:
The experiment aims to provide insight into the thermal conductivity of
different metals and how this affects the rate of energy transfer through
them. The findings will be useful for understanding the properties of
different materials and their practical applications in various industries
Q2. Out of the two solid bodies’ steel and copper which one is a good heat
conductor? Why?
Answer:
Copper is a better heat conductor than steel. This is because copper has a
higher thermal conductivity, which means it can transfer heat more
efficiently than steel. Copper also has a lower specific heat capacity, which
means it can absorb and release heat more quickly than steel. Steel has a
lower thermal conductivity and a higher specific heat capacity, which
makes it less efficient at transferring heat.
Q3. From graph how one can say one metal is good heat absorber than
other?
Answer:
One can determine which metal is a better heat absorber than the
other by looking at the slope of their temperature vs. time graphs. The
steeper the slope of the graph, the faster the temperature of the metal
increases, indicating that it is a better heat absorber. Conversely, the
shallower the slope of the graph, the slower the temperature of the
metal increases, indicating that it is a poorer heat absorber.