GotNoise DT Edits
GotNoise DT Edits
GotNoise DT Edits
Got Noise?
by Jared Lloyd Photography
Copyright © 2021
All rights reserved. This book, and all of the photographs and
written text contained therein, are the intellectual property of the
author and are protected by U.S. and international copyright laws.
No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any
form without the prior written permission of the author.
Here is a question for you. Have you ever taken the time to However, none of this actually has anything to do with the
look at the actual file size of your images? amount of available light when you photographed. The fact
that the sky was overcast, or sunny, or it was dawn, or noon,
I am not talking about the pixel dimensions, but the or an hour after sunset, is completely irrelevant to all of this.
megabytes (MB). If not, do it. You might be surprised that the Instead, it’s about the amount of light you ALLOWED your
numbers are all over the place. It doesn’t matter that you’re camera to capture.
shooting with the same camera, or that the images are all
from the same day or even the same shoot. Chances are, you You see, all of this is a choice — whether you realize it or not
will find quite a bit of variability in the amount of information at first. You make a choice every time you trip your camera’s
contained inside each individual photograph. shutter as to how much information you are going to record
and therefore how big and clean your files are. By the way,
One image might be 100MB. The next, 81MB. The following, bigger file sizes are better!
20MB. The maximum file size that you can capture with your
images is, of course, dictated by the resolution of your This choice comes in the form of your exposure. How large
camera. Naturally a 50-megapixel camera will have larger files or small is your aperture? How high is your ISO? What about
than a 16-megapixel camera. But sometimes it doesn’t. your shutter speed? All these things come together to dictate
how much light your camera’s sensor will record. Technically,
So why, if you are shooting with a 50-megapixel sensor aperture and shutter dictate how much light comes into the
in your camera, are you bringing home images that are camera, whereas your ISO setting dictates how sensitive to
sometimes the same size or smaller than those from your old light your sensor is.
16 megapixel? The answer to this lies in the thing that your
camera’s sensor was designed to capture: light. So, if we can agree that more information is better, why would
you make the conscious decision NOT to capture the biggest
In digital photography, light is information. Your camera is and most information-packed files possible? Why would you
not capturing the life force of an animal; it is capturing light consciously degrade your photographs in the field?
reflecting off it.
Let’s take this a step further. You see, whereas light equals
This is all our camera sensors do: They record light. The more information, the lack of information equals noise in our
light you have, the more information you have, and the larger photographs. That’s all noise is: a lack of information. It can
the file size you have to work with. Likewise, the less light you look like graininess in the image. It can look like a neon-
have, the less information you have, so your file sizes end up colored Jackson Pollock painting with splatters of green and
being smaller. magenta in the shadows. Photographers lose sleep over the
noise in their photographs. They spend extra money on
WARNING!
information for your camera to work with than darker tones.
Darker tones, on the other hand, are places with a lack of
light, and this is why we tend to see noise in shadows first.
90 percent of the
In other words, the brighter the photograph, the more information I see on the
information that is captured with the image. Conversely, the web about histograms is
darker the photograph, or maybe we should say, the more
underexposed that it is, the less information that is recorded.
completely WRONG!
This is where sayings like “expose to the right” come from. It’s
something of a mantra that we all repeat to ourselves in our
heads. Most photographers have heard this, and they even
know that it is something they are supposed to do. However,
The first bit of the above paragraph should, by now, all make sense.
The last part may not be so obvious. However, if you remember
that each column on the histogram equates to roughly one full stop
of light, then you can always make a quick and dirty judgment call
as to how much more light you need to add to the exposure.
All of this seems simple enough, right? Push the exposure as far
the right on your histogram as possible in order to reduce noise and As you can see from the picture above,
give you the biggest files possible to work with. Cut and dry. Well, the two blocks are exactly the same
almost. There is a catch. When we expose to the right, and I mean
really expose to the right, our images are going to look washed out. shade of gray. You perceive one to
Colors will be awful. Shadows will be awful. be darker than the other, however,
because of the highlights, shading, and
Expletives will tumble from your mouth followed by my name. It’s background colors. Light and color are
OK. I’m used to it. straightforward physics, but our brains
But, as long as you have not overexposed in the literal sense of
are a swirling vortex of mysteries full of
the phrase by blowing out your highlights or whites, then all of the biases, assumptions, and perception.
information you need for the photograph is there. The key here is
to understand that in digital photography, processing your images is CHECK YOUR HISTOGRAM!!!!
now 50 percent of the game.