Ortho Photo Hindawi
Ortho Photo Hindawi
Ortho Photo Hindawi
Review Article
Technique for Orthodontic Clinical Photographs
Using a Smartphone
1
Centre for Family Oral Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 50300, Malaysia
2
Centre of Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontic Studies, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Sungai Buloh 4700,
Selangor, Malaysia
Copyright © 2022 Al Imran Shahrul et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution
License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is
properly cited.
Smartphone cameras have advanced at a rapid rate. With this advancement, it is possible to take high quality orthodontic clinical
photographs using a smartphone. The aim of this article is to describe the technique to take orthodontic clinical photographs using
a smartphone.
(a) (b)
Figure 4: LED ring light (a) and intraoral LED light (b).
Accessory equipment such as a cheek retractor and to an average model, can capture quality orthodontic photos
mirror is essential for intraoral photography (Figure 5). with the proper technique (Figure 6). The author strongly
Various sizes of retractors and mirrors are available on the believes that a photo taken with a smartphone is better than
market. The size should be selected according to the patient. no photo at all.
A transparent retractor and a mirror with a handle are The author would like to emphasize the importance of
recommended. data privacy when taking clinical photos with a smartphone
[15]. Due to the connectivity of smartphones to the internet,
3. Discussion the possibility of the picture being leaked online is signifi-
cantly higher. The author recommends that clinical photos
In the hands of an experienced dentist, the picture quality of should not be kept together with personal photos. Using a
a DSLR camera system is far superior to that of a smart- separate phone or folder for clinical photos is best. To ensure
phone. Furthermore, there are certain technical differences that unauthorized personnel do not gain access to the photos,
between taking a picture with a smartphone and a DSLR. the folder should be password protected. Sharing of photos via
These differences are summarised in Table 1. Hence, for a messenger or social media is prohibited without the consent
dentist who uses a DSLR daily, there is a need to get of the patient. The connectivity of smartphones does provide
refamiliarized with the new settings. However, the inferior an advantage. Photos stored on the phone can be transferred
picture quality of smartphones does not mean that photo- immediately to a computer or cloud storage. This ensures that,
graphs taken with a smartphone are unacceptable for an in the unfortunate event of a lost phone or SD card failure,
orthodontic clinical record. Based on the author’s experi- there is a backup file available. Finally, when a smartphone is
ence, any modern-day smartphone, from the top-of-the-line no longer being used, its memory should be erased.
4 International Journal of Dentistry
Table 1: Summary of the technical differences between a DSLR and a smartphone in taking orthodontic photographs.
DSLR Smartphone
Picture format JPEG/RAW JPEG/RAW
Depends on the smartphone manufacturer (select the longest focal
Lens focal length 100 mm focal length lens with macrocapabilities
length lens)
Additional A macro ring or twin flash attached to the
External continuous LED light
lighting camera hot shoe
Extraoral: F8 Depends on the smartphone manufacturer (select the highest
Aperture
Intraoral: F22 aperture number possible)
ISO 100 100 or lowest possible
Shutter speed 1/100 per second 1/100 per second
White balance Neutral Auto
Autofocus
Manual focus Autofocus
settings
(a)
(b)
Figure 6: Photos taken (a) without the proper technique and (b) with the proper technique.
International Journal of Dentistry 5
References
[1] J. Sandler and A. Murray, “Clinical photography in an or-
thodontic practice environment part 1,” Orthodontic Update,
vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 70–75, 2010.