SAE International SAE Transactions: This Content Downloaded From 194.27.186.225 On Sat, 10 Dec 2022 10:46:09 UTC
SAE International SAE Transactions: This Content Downloaded From 194.27.186.225 On Sat, 10 Dec 2022 10:46:09 UTC
SAE International SAE Transactions: This Content Downloaded From 194.27.186.225 On Sat, 10 Dec 2022 10:46:09 UTC
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
SAE International is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to SAE
Transactions
This content downloaded from 194.27.186.225 on Sat, 10 Dec 2022 10:46:09 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
850890
4.673
0096-736X/86/9404-0673$02.50
Copyright 1986 Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc.
This content downloaded from 194.27.186.225 on Sat, 10 Dec 2022 10:46:09 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
system as shown in Figure 1. The loading conditions modified Galerkin integral (with respect to A
for the numerical example problem are shown in parameters). In the variational form the GalerRîn
Figure 2. The triangular plate is subjected to a bi- principle appears to be
axial loading. The governing equation for the buckling
loads is obtained under the assumption of linear (small)
displacements (5). If w is the transverse displacement, (jļDll -,xxxx + (2D12 + ^óé^xxyy
then this equation can be written in the following form
D..W
11 +,xx
(2D10
121266
+ 4D¿¿)w
,xxyy 66 22
+ D00w 22
,yyyy + D o o w + N w
22 o o w ,yy + ^x w ,xx
+ Nw + N w =0
X ,xx y ,yy
+ ^D^ ah = 0 *1(Dll»,xx*Dl2»,yy'¡27^
@ y = xh/a: w = 0, (D^w ^ + Dļ2Wjyy)h2 2
+ (D12w,xx+d22w,yy)-F- 2
+ (D12w,xx + D22w,yy)a2 a + n
- *°66ah = 0
An approximate solution is presented to this
problem based on a modified Galerkin approach. The
more familiar Galerkin method requires that the 66 ,xy a2 + h2J V f~2Va +y
> >
ha2 =+ nh n 0
assumed solution satisfy all the edge boundary
conditions. It is difficult to come up with such a x = ay/h
solution for the present problem. The following mode
shape The double integral in the above equation has to be
computed over the area, A, of the plate.
w = w = £ ZAmn(sin TT* In the Galerkin approach, the error in satisfying
the governing differential equation is minimized with
respect to the assumed mode shape. In the modified
. niTX
- sin . . miry* n 0 form, the error from the unsatisfied edge conditions is
a . h - -
also considered. The above principle provides a system
m = 1,3,5,7, ... n = 1,3,5,7, . . . , m¿ n of homogeneous equations for the solution of the
amplitude parameters and the requirement that this
solution be nontrivial provides the buckling load. The
numerical results for the examples considered in the
next section are obtained using a six term
approximation for the mode shape. The combination
. n ïïx . m iryx ^ 0
- sin . of m and n considered are (1, 3), (1, 5), (3, 5), (l, 7), (3,
a , h - -
7), and (5, 7).
4.674
This content downloaded from 194.27.186.225 on Sat, 10 Dec 2022 10:46:09 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
850890
fuselage section subjected to multiaxial loading in on the height to semi-base width of the
Reference (l). The following material properties v isosceles triangular plate in load Case 2.
typical of a graphite/epoxy composite, are used for the ii) v Certain ply orientations like (0, 90)s, (0, 90, +
individual lamina. 45)s and (0, + 60)§ are very efficient
compared to the metallic isotropic material
in load Case 2 at h/a ratios above 3.
Ejj = 18.5 X lO^psi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
E22 = E33 = 1#6^ X 1()6Psi This work was supported by the Manufacturin
Branch, Lockheed-Georgia Company. We acknowled
= ^*55 " ^66 ~ ^.87 x ^ Ps* Dr. Roy Scruggs, Program Manager, for his support
cooperation.
Isotropic plate, v = 0.3; E = 10 x 10^ psi 1. Reddy, A.D., Valisetty, R.R. and Rehfield, L.W.,
"Continuous Filament Wound Composite
Results are presented in Figures (3) - (11) for the Stiffening Concepts for Aircraft Fuselage
primary buckling load. These are nondimensionalized Structures," presented at the 25th
with respect to the corresponding buckling loads of a AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS Structures, Structur
rectangular plate (2a x h) in the same loading situation Dynamics and Materials Conference, Palm
and with the same boundary restraint. The plate is Springs, CA, May 1984. Accepted for publication
subjected to three different loads as shown in Figure 2. in the Journal of Aircraft.
The results are studied on the basis of the ability of
the laminated plate to resist these loads and a size 2. Timoshenko, S., Theory of Elastic Stability,
parameter, h/a, which is the ratio of plate height to its McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., 1st Edition, p.
base dimensions.
371, 1936 .
Figures 3-8 illustrate the variation of critical
load ratios of the triangular plate (P A) to 3. Klitchielf, J.M., "Buckling of a Triangular Plate
rectangular plate (P □) with respect to the h/a ratios By Shearing Forces," Quarterly Journal of
for different materials. The case of an isotropic rightMechanics and Applied Mathematics, Vol. IV, Pt.
angled triangle (h/a = 1) indicates that the load 3, pp. 257-259, 1951.
capacity of the skin element can be doubled by
changing the plate from square to triangle in load Case 4. Cox, H.L. and Klein, B., "The Buckling of
3.
Isosceles Triangular Plates," Journal of the
The (0, 90) layup though close to one another in Aeronautical Society, pp. 321-325, May, 1955.
load Cases 1 ands3, the performance increases steeply
for Case 2 at higher h/a ratios. The load ratio is about 5. Timoshenko, S. and Gere, J.M ., Theory of
9.5 at h/a = 4. This means that side angles greater Elastic Stability, McGraw-Hill, 1961.
than 70 provide better skin designs.
The results on three quasi-isotropic layups (0, 90, 6. Jones, R.M., Mechanics of Composite Materials,
+ 45) , (+ 45, 0, 90) and (0, + 60) (Figures 5-7) provide McGraw-Hill, 1975.
somes interesting rlsults. Figuri 5 is comparable to
Figure 7 whereas Figure 6 has almost no resemblance
to either of these. The (+ 45, 0, 90) layup behaves
very similar to the homogeneous isotropic material
case. Unlike the metallic isotropic case (Figure 3), the
other two quasi-isotropic layups have a higher load
carrying ability at h/a ratios beyond 3. This may be a
helpful design input.
The (+ 45) and (+ 45, + 45) layups give the same
results because of the normalization with respect to a
rectangular plate of the same material. This layup is
not superior to the metallic case.
CONCLUSIONS
4.675
This content downloaded from 194.27.186.225 on Sat, 10 Dec 2022 10:46:09 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
5|
Y • Cas* 1
4 - A Case 2
p. ■ Case 3
/ ' h 1 «
12 3 4
L
h
h/a
Figure 1. Dimensions and Coordinate System for Figure 3. Isotropic Case - Aluminum
Qy
Y OC- CASE2
12 3 4
h/a
X/_p-25ÎL_ Nv=0
a2+h2
Figure 4. Plate with (0, 90) 8 Lay up
-X N»="P # Case 1 /
ft 1 1 1 1 r g
4
■
-
Case
A Case
3
2
v/7v^ case 3
Y'p
Nx=-P 1 -
1 2 3 *
r 1 1 1 1 'Y '* h/a
4.676
This content downloaded from 194.27.186.225 on Sat, 10 Dec 2022 10:46:09 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
850890
5 ļ
# Case 1
4 - A Case 2
U ■ Case 3
12 3 4
h/a
Figure 6. Plate wi
# Case 1 /
4 - ▲ Case 2 /
□ ■ Case 3 É
1 -
12 3 4
h/a
• Case 1
4 - A Case 2 -
^ ■ Ca*re3^^
12 3 4
h/a
4.677
This content downloaded from 194.27.186.225 on Sat, 10 Dec 2022 10:46:09 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms