Annex 7 Workshop at Eastern Partnership Youth Forum
Annex 7 Workshop at Eastern Partnership Youth Forum
Annex 7 Workshop at Eastern Partnership Youth Forum
In 23 and 24 November 2021, the 5th Eastern Partnership Youth Forum was organized by the
Slovenian Presidency of the Council DG NEAR and SALTO. The Forum, focused on youth
participation in democratic processes, gathered youth workers, active and critical young people
and youth policymakers from the Eastern Partnership countries, the European Union and its
Member States.
General overview
Topic(s) that you identified as the most important from the plenary:
Youth in action plan – Global document and there is the intention to take regional
1
specificities into account, how exactly is unclear at the moment
1. What could be considered a successful Youth Action Plan? What would you like to
see accomplished by 2027?
Inclusion
Covering the gaps that other initiatives are not covering
Including a component of building on what has already been achieved - collecting
results, following up with policy implementation, evaluation
One that ensures young people are involved (considered) across all programmes
and budgetary lines
One that considers young people as a resource to solutions related to them.
One that brings added value related to young people in therms of respecting their
"specific" situation of being YOUNG
Increased level of youth engagment
Sustainable and meaningful engagment of youth in decision-making processes
Young people being considered not as an issue, but a solution for the existing
challenges
2. Based on your experience, what are the main challenges for meaningful youth
participation?
Communication channels
Young people can use support to shape better their messages and target the right
decision makers. Content should be there, but "packaging" is also important
Insufficient financial means
Political obstacles
Lack of awareness about the ways how to be involved
Lack of trustness that it makes sense
Unemployment problems
not having an ecosystem approach. To make it meaningful and sustainable it is
worthy working with youth, intermediaries (youth workers / youth organizations),
building capacity of policy makers (targeted), and supporting mechanisms for
dialogue
Most importantly - follow up with the agreements and decision points after
dialogue between youth and decision makers, since sometimes decisions /
recommendations stay on the paper and no one comes back to them
Lack of understanding why youth participation is important
Indifference of governments to youth participation
Lack of knowledge about conditions for appropriate participation (RMSOS)
There are always other priorities for decision makers
Lack of labour market regulation
Lack of overall understanding of the terminology on what is
participation/empowerment
2
Low rate access to the information in rural areas
Low trust rate to the state
Lack of communaction between the state and the youth
Tockenistic instruments for youth participation
Pro-state structures, who pretend to embrace youth participation
3. In addressing those challenges, where would the EU action have the biggest
impact in strengthening youth participation and empowerment? What concrete
EU support measure or initiative would you recommend?
Support mechanism for youth initiatives at local community level
Bolder support for democracy and democratic movements as many challenges stem
from the inability of youth activists in non-democratic countries to use classic
instruments of fostering youth participation (youth councils or cooperation with the
governments,)
International platforms for sharing good practices of youth participation
Improving the national / regional / international youth participation mechanisms
and empowering them to take stronger role in decision making / advocacy for youth
related matters
Windows (special funds) for specific countries or regions. For example it could be a
special Belarusian Youth Window which could prowide different resources to
support yong people and youth organisations in Belarus
Guiding
Mainstreaming youth
Monitoring progress
Training for trainers
ToT on youth advocacy
Financial support to the right actors in the field
Establishing programs for support of rural youth
Funding of the NGOs intiatives
Monitoring the process
Details
3
Ensure real participation of young people and not just tockenism
Work in the countries where there is lack of trust towards national goverments
Did they focus on a specific group of young people? Which one(s)? Why?
Please describe if they spoke about youth from a particular country or background. (Write
this information in bullet points.)
There was a question of what could be done in relations to Belarus situation, what could be
done to support people from there? There are lots of problems with implementing the
project there. This is similar to other regions and countries like Syria, so maybe there are
some strategies that can be used.
There is a focus on youth participation and engagement, taking into account shrinking
space for civil society and other obstacles for participants.
N/A
Did they propose any changes? Which one(s)? Why? (Write this information in bullet
points. If not mentioned, leave blank.)
N/A