Position Paper 9 - Art, Intellectual Life and Modern Culture

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

By the end of the 19th century, Japan had been integrated to the world’s politics in which it

even became a major player following its decisive victory in the Sino-Japanese War.

Nevertheless, there were concerns about Japan’s fading character: an argument about the

essence of the Japan. According to particularists, Japan has timeless distinctive characteristics

that are unfathomable for aliens abroad. Initially vague in defining the tenets of this

exceptionalism, particularists struggled in eliciting a distinguished identity out Shinto traditions,

Heian Period sensibilities, harsh ethos of the warrior class in the boisterous arts of the Tokugawa

townsmen, or in the austere puritanism of Tokugawa Confucianism. They tried to find

uniqueness in the relation between the emperor and his subjects and sought to liken it to a

familial relationship in which the emperor acts as the father who, under the guidance of the sun

goddess, Amaterasu, immerses his children in benevolence and care but demands their

unwavering loyalty.

On the other hand, cosmopolitan thinkers believed that development is the inevitable fate of

human beings. Japan’s development was a culmination of a series of events that propelled Japan

to an egalitarian, free, and democratic society. In addition, they believed in the existence of

trends that transcend the geographical barriers between humans. In other words, Japan was not

detached from other humans. As an implication of these propositions, Japan could be deemed as

a nondescript state, refuting the particularists’ premise. Moreover, the trend of emancipation has

been halted or stymied following Meiji’s restoration with the state descending to

authoritarianism, impairing the cosmopolitan thinkers’ argument.

By that time, the rapid industrialization started affecting the social fabric with the industrial

output increasing man folds. As a result, there were manifest concerns about the widening gap

between the rich and the poor. In order to discuss the ideal course of action, many associations

were founded. Organizing the Social Policy Association, Kuwada Kumazo and Kanai En

supported the capitalist system but recommended introducing factory legislations and initiating
workers’ insurance programs to protect the rights of the workers while distancing themselves

from socialism which they deplored for being a hindrance to progress. In conclusion, they

postulated that socialism is not necessary for Japan and surmised that Japan, which could

establish a constitutional government without shedding blood, would be able to overcome the

fissure between the classes.

On the other hand, other thinkers were willing to criticize capitalism vociferously and

promote socialism as an alternative. Those thinkers founded Social Democratic Party with the

goal of eliminating the gap between the rich and the poor and promoting pacifism. They called

for nationalization, abolishment of the house of peers, disarmament, and the reduction of the size

of the Japanese army and navy. A distinguishing characteristic of the founders of Social

Democratic Party is that their majority adhered to Christianity who perceived themselves as

servants of Jesus and saw in socialism as the secular instrumentality of bring social and

economic justice to Japan. Moreover, they were among the disillusioned with the Jiyuto’s

alignment with the government. They were basically influenced by Karl Marx although they

added a moral dimension to his analysis of the structural and historical reasons of capitalism.

Ironically, the party was banned within 12 hours after the publication of its manifesto, and all

the editions of the newspapers that included it were confiscated under the law Public Peace

Police Law which was enacted in 1900. Nevertheless, it shouldn’t be construed that the

government perceived socialist thoughts as threat to public order. In fact, public officials

approached the party members and offered lifting the ban in exchange of recanting the

manifesto’s provisions of abolishing the house of peers and reducing the size of the army and

the military. It should be noted that the party didn’t espouse radical thoughts; they still supported

the Meiji’s constitution and didn’t object to the Emperor’s role within the contemporary political

edifice. They didn’t believe in overturning the government through violence, as they satisfied
that they can change the system thanks to the nascent democratic parliamentary system. All they

needed is convincing the public with their ideas. Unfortunately, due to the restrictions on party

membership, the party couldn’t fill its ranks, as most of their publications’ readers were

basically students who were prohibited from joining any political party. Like other political

parties, the social democrats fell into disarray with the emergence of a radical faction composed

mainly of direct-action proponents like Kōtoku Shūsui, who convicted with treason on charges

of plotting to assassinate the Emperor.

As a result of its alliance with the British Empire, Japan declared war on Germany and

attacked its holdings in China. The Japanese economy flourished with the western commodities

exported to the east are being allocated to the war effort. Nevertheless, this boom proved

temporary, as Japan plunged into economic crisis with inflation rates soaring and rice prices

increasing. As a result, Rice Riots took place in 1918: the largest disturbance to occur after

Satsuma’s Rebellion. The Rice Riots were different for the whole affair was economic not

political, as people were being pushed to the brink. Nevertheless, liberal democrats ascribed the

crisis to the lack of inclusiveness and apathy of the government towards the general population

not to capitalism. In addition, they viewed capitalism as a degenerate form of democracy. They

believed that the current governance system favored the rich owning capital and paid no effort to

ameliorate the conditions of the people. As a result, they pushed for democratization and

universal male suffrage. Meanwhile, communism started entrenching itself in the community in

response to the grievances of the labor.

You might also like