This document summarizes the debate around when and where the "First Cry" of the Philippine revolution took place based on different historical accounts. It discusses the three possible events that the "Cry" could refer to: 1) the decision to revolt ("pasya"), 2) the tearing of cedulas ("pagpupunit"), or 3) the first encounter with Spanish forces ("unang labanan"). Historians disagree on which specific event the "Cry" commemorates and where it occurred, with sources citing locations like Balintawak, Bahay Toro, and Pugad Lawin on different dates. The document analyzes evidence from various memoirs and historians to shed light on this historical ambiguity.
This document summarizes the debate around when and where the "First Cry" of the Philippine revolution took place based on different historical accounts. It discusses the three possible events that the "Cry" could refer to: 1) the decision to revolt ("pasya"), 2) the tearing of cedulas ("pagpupunit"), or 3) the first encounter with Spanish forces ("unang labanan"). Historians disagree on which specific event the "Cry" commemorates and where it occurred, with sources citing locations like Balintawak, Bahay Toro, and Pugad Lawin on different dates. The document analyzes evidence from various memoirs and historians to shed light on this historical ambiguity.
This document summarizes the debate around when and where the "First Cry" of the Philippine revolution took place based on different historical accounts. It discusses the three possible events that the "Cry" could refer to: 1) the decision to revolt ("pasya"), 2) the tearing of cedulas ("pagpupunit"), or 3) the first encounter with Spanish forces ("unang labanan"). Historians disagree on which specific event the "Cry" commemorates and where it occurred, with sources citing locations like Balintawak, Bahay Toro, and Pugad Lawin on different dates. The document analyzes evidence from various memoirs and historians to shed light on this historical ambiguity.
This document summarizes the debate around when and where the "First Cry" of the Philippine revolution took place based on different historical accounts. It discusses the three possible events that the "Cry" could refer to: 1) the decision to revolt ("pasya"), 2) the tearing of cedulas ("pagpupunit"), or 3) the first encounter with Spanish forces ("unang labanan"). Historians disagree on which specific event the "Cry" commemorates and where it occurred, with sources citing locations like Balintawak, Bahay Toro, and Pugad Lawin on different dates. The document analyzes evidence from various memoirs and historians to shed light on this historical ambiguity.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 9
Excerpt from “Notes on the “Cry” of August veterans took, she says - that the “Cry”
1896” should mean the unang labanan.
By: Jim Richardson It was the unang labanan, as Borromeo- Buehler points out, that was commemorated by Pasya, Pagpupunit, at Unang Labanan the first monument of the events of August 1896. The debate has long been clouded by a The main inscription on the plinth read lack of consensus on precisely what is meant by “Homenaje del Pueblo Filipino a los Heroes de the “Cry.” The term has been applied to three ’96 /Ala-alang sa Bayang Pilipino sa mga Bayani related but distinct events — ng ‘96”, and a smaller plaque bore the date “26 Agosto 1896”. the “pasya” – the decision to revolt; the “pagpupunit” – the tearing of cedulas; and First Cry of the Katipunan the “unang labanan” – the first encounter These include: with Spanish forces. Guillermo Masangkay’s “The Cry of Balintawak” To state the obvious, these three events did Lt. Olegario Diaz not all happen at the same time and place. When and where the “Cry” should be commemorated Gregoria de Jesus’ version of the “First Cry” thus depends on how it is defined. Julio Nakpil Version Many of the older sources on the “Cry” do Santiago Alvarez’s “The Cry of Bahay Toro” not precisely say which event they mean, and often we can only guess. This problem is so Pio Valenzuela’s controversial “Cry of Pugad embedded in the literature that it is impossible to Lawin” eradicate. Still, wherever practicable, these notes will avoid the fluid, contested “Cry” word and First cry – call for rebellion seek instead to specify which particular event is It started when the katipunan was discovered in being discussed – the pasya, the pagpupunit or August 19, 1896 the unang labanan. Natuklasan ng mga Espanyol ang lihim ng Among the historians who have studied the Katipunan sa pamamagitan ng isang miyembro “Cry” in greatest detail, there is a sharp nito na si Teodoro Patiño. divergence of opinion as to how the term should be defined. Bunga ng alitan sa kapwa katipunero na si Apolonio Cruz tungkol sa promosyon sa Teodoro A. Agoncillo equates the term tanggapan ng Diario de Manila, sinabi ni Teodoro with the pagpupunit, which he says Patiño sa kanyang kapatid na babae na si happened immediately after the pasya. Honoria Patiño ang tungkol sa samahan. Isagani R. Medina also takes the “Cry” to Pinakiusapan niya iyong umuwi na sa kanilang mean the pagpupunit, but says it lalawigan sa Visayas upang makaligtas sa gulo happened before the decision to revolt rito. Naikwento ng babae ang lahat ng sinabi ng had been taken. kapatid kay Madre Sor Teresa de Jesus na siya namang nagkwento kay Padre Mariano Gil, ang Soledad Borromeo-Buehler takes the kura paroko ng Tondo. Pinilit ng madre si Patiño view – the traditional view that KKK na isiwalat ang lahat ng kanyang nalalaman tungkol sa plano ng Katipunan. Noong Agosto 19,1896 sa ganap na ika-6 ng tinatawag nilang kangkong na nasa tapat ng gabi, ikinumpisal ni Teodoro ang lihim kay Padre balintawak Mariano Gil. Santiago Alvarez whose memoirs identified the place as Bahay Toro and the date as Aug. 25, 1896. Sumalakay sa talyer si Padre Mariano Gil kasama ng gwardya sibil at sa kanilang Saan nanggaling ang Pugad Lawin? paghahalughog ay natuklasan ang mga katibayang sinabi ni Patiño. Dahil dito, Sigaw ng Pugad Lawin (El Grito de Rebellion) na ang ibig sabihin ay “desisyun” o pagtawag ng natuklasan ang lihim ng Katipunan. himagsikan Dito pumapasok ang binitawang pahayag ng isa Ang tanong saan ba talaga naganap ang First sa kanang kamay ni Bonifacio na si Pio Cry? Valenzuela, ayun sa kanya ginanap daw ang unang sigaw sa sitio gulod pugad lawin noong Sa kasaluyan ang tinatanggap na petsa ng First august 23, 1896 sa tahanan ng nag ngangalang cry ay August 23, 1896 juan ramos na anak ni tandang sora. Yung Anu nga ba ang mga importanteng detalye na naganap daw sa tahanan ni apolonio Samson ay sumusuporta sa unang sigaw sa Balintawak at pag uusap lamang ayun kay pio Valenzuela at unang sigaw sa pugad lawin. walang naging desisyun tungkol sa rebolusyun kaya ang sinasabi ni pio Valenzuela ang unang Ayun kay Guillermo Masangkay ang unang sigaw ay ginanap talaga sa pugad lawin kung sigaw ng rebolusyun ay sa Balintawak noong saan naging decisive ang katipunan para Aug. 26, 1896. magkaroon na ng rebellion laban sa mga Sa bahay ni Apolonio Samson isang Cabesa ng espanyol. kalookan. Note ang balintawak ay part ng kalookan at wala pang Quezon City noon. Nag karoon ng pag aaral ang ating National Ang pag pupulong ay pinatawag ni andress Historical Commission at ayun na rin kay bonifacio ng bandang 9 ng umaga at sya ay Teodoro Agoncillo na syang kumuha sa pahayag tinulungan ni Emilio Jacinto, sila ay nanghingi ng ni pio Valenzuela talaga daw na dapat na ilipat tulong o kinukumbinsi nila ang mga tao na ang petsa ng unang sigaw sa august 23 1896 sa sumapi o sumali sa rebolusyon. pugad lawin. Ayun naman kay Spanish Lt. Olegario Diaz ang So mula sa kalookan na ilipat sa pugad lawin sa unang sigaw ng rebolusyun ay sa Balintawak quezon city ang unang sigaw ng rebulusyun noong Aug. 24, 1896. Agrarian Reform History written by the Gregoria “Oryang” de Jesus Nakpil, widow of Department of Agrarian Reform Andres Bonifacio, wrote a short autobiography, entitled “Mga tala ng aking buhay,” where she Pre-Hispanic Period stated that the Cry of Balintawak took place on “This land is ours; God gave this land to us.” Aug. 25, 1896 in Pasong Tamo! Before the Spaniards came to the Ayun naman kay Julio Nakpil, second husband Philippines, Filipinos lived in villages or of Gregoria de Jesus, ang sabi nya august 24 barangays ruled by chiefs or datus. The datus 1896 ginanap ang unang sigaw sa lugar na comprised the nobility, followed by the timawa corporations may acquire, that is, 16 (freemen), aliping namamahay (serfs), and hectares for private individuals and aliping saguiguilid (slaves). 1,024 hectares for corporations. However, despite the existence of different Land Registration Act of 1902 (Act No. classes in the social structure, everyone had 496) – provided a comprehensive access to the fruits of the soil. Money was registration of land titles under the unknown, and rice served as the medium of Torrens system. exchange. Public Land Act of 1903 – introduced the Spanish Colonial Period homestead system in the Philippines. “United we stand, divided we fall.” Tenancy Act of 1933 (Act No. 4054 and 4113) – regulated relationships between When the Spaniards came to the landowners and tenants of rice (50-50 Philippines, the concept of encomienda (royal sharing) and sugar cane lands. land grants) was introduced. This system grants that encomienderos must defend his The Torrens system, which the encomienda from external attack, maintain Americans instituted for the registration peace and order within, and support the of lands, did not solve the problem missionaries. In turn, the encomiendero acquired completely. Either they were not aware the right to collect tribute from the Indios of the law, or if they did, they could not (natives). pay the survey cost and other fees required in applying for a Torrens title. The system, however, degenerated into the abuse of power by the encomienderos. The Commonwealth Period tribute soon became land rents to a few powerful “Government for the Filipinos” landlords, and the natives who once cultivated the lands in freedom were transformed into mere Manuel L. Quezon adopted the “Social share tenants. Justice” program to arrest the increasing social The First Philippine Republic unrest in Central Luzon. Significant legislation enacted during the “The yoke has finally broken.” Commonwealth Period: When the First Philippine Republic was 1935 Constitution – “The promotion of established in 1899, Gen. Emilio Aguinaldo declared in the Malolos Constitution his intention social justice to ensure the well-being and economic security of all people to confiscate large estates, especially the so- called friar lands. should be the concern of the State.” Commonwealth Act No. 178 (An However, as the Republic was short-lived, Aguinaldo’s plan was never implemented. Amendment to Rice Tenancy Act No. 4045), Nov. 13, 1936 – provided certain American Colonial Period controls in the landlord-tenant relationships “Long live America!” National Rice and Corn Corporation, Significant legislation enacted during the 1936 – established the price of rice and American Period: corn, thereby helping poor tenants and Philippine Bill of 1902 – set the ceilings consumers. on the hectare private individuals and Commonwealth Act. No. 461, 1937 – RA No. 55 – provided for a more specified reasons for the dismissal of effective safeguard against arbitrary tenants and only with the approval of the ejectment of tenants. Tenancy Division of the Department of Elpidio R. Quirino (1948–1953) enacted the Justice. following law: Rural Program Administration, created Executive Order No. 355 issued on on March 2, 1939 – provided the purchase and lease of haciendas and October 23, 1950 – replaced the National Land Settlement Administration with Land Settlement their sale and lease to the tenants. Development Corporation, which took over the Commonwealth Act No. 441, enacted on responsibilities of the Agricultural Machinery June 3, 1939 – created the National Equipment Corporation and the Rice and Corn Settlement Administration with a capital Production Administration. stock of P20,000,000. Ramon Magsaysay (1953–1957) enacted the Japanese Occupation following laws: “The Era of Hukbalahap” RA No. 1160 of 1954 – abolished the LASEDECO and established the Upon the arrival of the Japanese in the National Resettlement and Rehabilitation Philippines in 1942, peasants’ and workers’ Administration to resettle dissidents and organizations grew in strength. Many peasants landless farmers. It was particularly took up arms and identified themselves with the aimed at rebel returnees providing home anti-Japanese group, the HUKBALAHAP lots and farmlands in Palawan and (Hukbong Bayan Laban sa Hapon). Mindanao. World War II started in Europe in 1939 and RA No. 1199 (Agricultural Tenancy Act the Pacific in 1941. The Hukbalahap controlled of 1954) – governed the relationship the entire Central Luzon; landlords who between landowners and tenant farmers supported the Japanese lost their lands to by organizing a shared tenancy and peasants, while those who supported the Huks leasehold system. The law provided the earned fixed rentals in favor of the tenants. security of tenure of tenants. It also Unfortunately, the end of the war also signaled created the Court of Agrarian Relations. the end of gains acquired by the peasants. RA No. 1400 (Land Reform Act of 1955) Philippine Republic – created the Land Tenure “The New Republic” Administration, which was responsible for the acquisition and distribution of After the establishment of the Philippine large tenanted rice and corn lands over Independence in 1946, the problems of land 200 hectares for individuals and 600 tenure remained. These became worst in certain hectares for corporations. areas. Thus, the Congress of the Philippines revised the tenancy law. RA No. 821 (Creation of Agricultural Credit Cooperative Financing Manuel A. Roxas (1946–1948) enacted the Administration) — provided small following laws: farmers and share tenants’ loans with Republic Act (RA) No. 34 – established low-interest rates of 6%–8%. the 70-30 sharing arrangements and Carlos P. Garcia (1957–1961) regulating shared tenancy contracts. He continued the program of President Presidential Decree No. 27, enacted on Ramon Magsaysay. No new legislation was October 21, 1972 – restricted land passed during his time. reform scope to tenanted rice and corn lands and set the retention limit at 7 Diosdado P. Macapagal (1961–1965) enacted hectares. the following law: Corazon C. Aquino (1986-1992) RA No. 3844 of August 8, 1963 (Agricultural Land Reform Code) – abolished The Constitution ratified by the Filipino shared tenancy, institutionalized leasehold; set people during the administration of President retention limit at 75 hectares; invested rights of Corazon C. Aquino provides under Section 21 pre-emption and redemption for tenant farmers; under Article II that “the State shall promote provided administrative machinery for comprehensive rural development and agrarian implementation, institutionalized a judicial system reform.” of agrarian cases; and incorporated extension, marketing, and supervised credit system of On June 10, 1988, former President Corazon C. Aquino signed RA No. 6657 or services of farmer-beneficiaries. otherwise known as the Comprehensive Agrarian The RA was hailed as one that would Reform Law. The law became effective on June emancipate Filipino farmers from the bondage of 15, 1988. tenancy. Subsequently, four Presidential issuances Ferdinand E. Marcos (1965–1986) were released in July 1987 after 48 nationwide consultations before the actual law was enacted. Proclamation No. 1081, enacted on September 21, 1972, ushered the Period of the President Corazon C. Aquino enacted the New Society. Five days after the proclamation of following laws: Martial Law, the entire country was proclaimed a land reform area, and simultaneously the Executive Order No. 228, enacted on July 16, 1987 – declared full ownership Agrarian Reform Program was decreed. to qualified farmer-beneficiaries covered President Marcos enacted the following laws: by PD 27. It also determined the value remaining unvalued rice and corn lands RA No. 6389 (Code of Agrarian Reform) subject of PD 27 and provided for the and RA No. 6390 of 1971 – created the manner of payment by the FBs and Department of Agrarian Reform and the mode of compensation to landowners. Agrarian Reform Special Account Fund. It strengthened the position of farmers Executive Order No. 229, enacted on and expanded the scope of agrarian July 22, 1987 – provided a mechanism reform. for the implementation of the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Presidential Decree No. 2, enacted on Program (CARP). September 26, 1972 – declared the country under a land reform program. It enjoined all agencies and offices of the government to extend full cooperation and assistance to the DAR. It also activated the Agrarian Reform Coordinating Council. Proclamation No. 131, enacted on July President Fidel V. Ramos enacted the following 22, 1987 – instituted the CARP as a laws: major program of the government. It provided for a special fund known as the RA No. 7881, 1995 – amended certain provisions of RA 6657 and exempted Agrarian Reform Fund, with an initial amount of Php50 billion to cover the fishponds and prawns from the coverage of CARP. estimated cost of the program from 1987 to 1992. RA No. 7905, 1995 – strengthened the implementation of the CARP. Executive Order No. 129-A, enacted on July 26, 1987 – streamlined and Executive Order No. 363, 1997 – limited expanded the power and operations of the type of lands that may be converted the DAR. by setting conditions under which specific categories of agricultural land RA No. 6657, enacted on June 10, 1988 (Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law) were either absolutely non-negotiable for conversion or highly restricted for – an act that became effective on June 15, 1988, that instituted a conversion. comprehensive agrarian reform program RA No. 8435, 1997 (Agriculture and to promote social justice and Fisheries Modernization Act AFMA) – industrialization, thereby providing the plugged the legal loopholes in land use mechanism for its implementation and conversion. other purposes. This law is still the one being implemented at present. RA 8532, 1998 (Agrarian Reform Fund Bill) – provided an additional Php50 Executive Order No. 405, enacted on billion for CARP and extended its June 14, 1990 – vested in the Land implementation for another 10 years. Bank of the Philippines the responsibility to determine land valuation and Joseph E. Estrada (1998–2000) compensation for all lands covered by “ERAP PARA SA MAHIRAP.” This was the CARP. battle cry that endeared President Joseph Executive Order No. 407, enacted on Estrada and made him popular during the 1998 June 14, 1990 – Accelerated the presidential election. acquisition and distribution of agricultural President Joseph E. Estrada enacted the lands, pasture lands, fishponds, following law: agroforestry lands, and other lands of the public domain suitable for Executive Order N0. 151, September agriculture. 1999 (Farmer’s Trust Fund) – allowed the voluntary consolidation of small farm Fidel V. Ramos (1992–1998) operation into medium- and large-scale When President Fidel V. Ramos formally integrated enterprises that could access took over in 1992, his administration came face- long-term capital. to-face with the public who had lost confidence in the agrarian reform program. His administration committed to the vision “Fairer, faster and more meaningful implementation of the Agrarian Reform Program.” During his administration, President concentration of the ARC population to Estrada launched the Magkabalikat Para achieve greater agro productivity. sa Kaunlarang Agraryo or MAGKASAKA. The DAR forged into joint Agrarian Justice – To help clear the backlog of agrarian cases, DAR would ventures with private investors in the agrarian sector to make FBs competitive. hire more paralegal officers to support undermanned adjudicatory boards and However, the Estrada administration was introduce a quota system to compel short-lived. The masses who put him into adjudicators to work faster on agrarian office demanded his ouster. reform cases. DAR would respect the rights of both farmers and landowners. Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo (2000–2010) Benigno Aquino III (2010–2016) The Agrarian reform program under the Arroyo administration was anchored on President Benigno Aquino III vowed the vision “To make the countryside during his 2012 State of the Nation economically viable for the Filipino family Address that he would complete CARP, by building partnership and promoting which is the centerpiece program of the social equity and new economic administration of his mother, President opportunities towards lasting peace and Corazon Aquino, before the end of his sustainable rural development.” term. Land Tenure Improvement (LTI) – DAR The younger Aquino distributed their would remain vigorous in implementing family-owned Hacienda Luisita in Tarlac. the land acquisition and distribution Apart from the said farm lots, he also component of CARP. The DAR would promised to complete the distribution of improve the land tenure system through privately owned lands of productive land distribution and leasehold. agricultural estates in the country that have escaped the program's coverage. Provision of Support Services – CARP not only involved the distribution of lands Under his administration, the Agrarian but also included a package of support Reform Community Connectivity and services, such as credit assistance, Economic Support Services project was extension services, irrigation facilities, created to contribute to the overall goal roads and bridges, marketing facilities, of rural poverty reduction, especially in and training and technical support agrarian reform areas. programs. Agrarian Production Credit Program Infrastructure Projects – DAR would provided credit support for crop transform the Agrarian reform production to newly organized and communities (ARCs), which focused and existing agrarian reform beneficiary integrated the delivery of support (ARB)’ organizations and farmers’ services into rural economic zones that organizations not qualified to avail would help create job opportunities in themselves of loans under the regular the countryside. credit windows of banks. KALAHI ARZone – The KALAHI The legal case monitoring system, which Agrarian Reform zones were also is a web-based legal system for launched. These zones consisted of one recording and monitoring various kinds or more municipalities with the of agrarian cases at the provincial, regional, and central offices of the DAR fast-track the implementation of CARP to ensure faster resolution and close (Department of Agrarian Reform [DAR], n.d.). monitoring of agrarian-related cases, was also launched. In addition to these initiatives, Aquino CARP or Comprehensive Agrarian Reform also enacted Executive Order No. 26, Program Series of 2011, to mandate the Department of Agriculture-Department of Implementation of Agrarian Reform in the Environment and Natural Resources- Philippines Department of Agrarian Reform Convergence Initiative to develop a The implementation of Agrarian Reforms National Greening Program in proceeded at a slow pace due to a lack of cooperation with other government political will. Redistribution of the land was also agencies. slow (A Status on the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program in the Philippines, n.d.). Rodrigo Roa Duterte (2016–present) Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law: Under his leadership, the President Philippines wanted to pursue an “aggressive” land reform program that would help alleviate The RA No. 6657, alternatively called the the life of poor Filipino farmers by Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law, was prioritizing the provision of support signed by Former President Corazon C. Aquino services alongside land distribution. on June 10, 1988. The Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law was responsible for the The President directed the DAR to implementation of the CARP in the Philippines. launch the 2nd phase of agrarian reform The law focused on industrialization in the where landless farmers would be Philippines together with social justice. awarded undistributed lands under the CARP. Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law: Objectives Duterte planned to place almost all public lands, including military reserves, The main objective of instituting the under agrarian reform. Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law was to successfully devise land reform in the Philippines The President also placed 400 hectares (A Status on the Comprehensive Agrarian of agricultural lands in Boracay under Reform Program in the Philippines, n.d.). It was CARP. President Arroyo who signed the Executive Order No. 456 on August 23 to rename the Under his administration, the DAR Department of Land Reform to the Department of created an anti-corruption task force to Agrarian Reform. This had been done in order to investigate and handle reports on expand the functional area of the law. In addition alleged anomalous activities by officials to land reform, the Department of Agrarian and employees of the department. Reform began to supervise other allied activities The Department also pursued an “Oplan to improve the beneficiaries' economic and social Zero Backlog” in the resolution of cases with status in the Philippines (Comprehensive Agrarian reform in Agrarian reform in agrarian Agrarian Reform, 2016). justice delivery of the agrarian reform program to The CARP is a Philippine state policy that ensures and promotes welfare to landless farmers and farm workers and elevates social justice and equity among rural areas (A Status on the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program in the Philippines, n.d.).
Department of Agrarian Reform
Mandate and Functions To lead in implementing the CARP through TI, agrarian justice, and coordinated delivery of essential support services to client beneficiaries. To provide land tenure security to landless farmers through land acquisition and distribution, leasehold arrangements’ implementation, and other LTI services. To provide legal intervention to ARBs through the adjudication of agrarian cases and legal assistance; To implement, facilitate, and coordinate the delivery of support services to ARBs through Social Infrastructure and Local Capability Building, Sustainable Agribusiness, and Rural Enterprise Development, and Access Facilitation and Enhancement Services.