Laltitude v. Shenzhen Jinnuo Precision Prods - Complaint
Laltitude v. Shenzhen Jinnuo Precision Prods - Complaint
Laltitude v. Shenzhen Jinnuo Precision Prods - Complaint
1
Omid E. Khalifeh, SBN 267340
Ariana Santoro, SBN 300767
2 Lara A. Petersen, SBN 318475
3 OMNI LEGAL GROUP
2029 Century Park E, Suite 400
4 Los Angeles, California 90067
5 Phone: 310.276.6664
Facsimile: 310.305.1550
6 [email protected]
7 [email protected]
[email protected]
8
Attorneys for Plaintiff
9
LALTITUDE LLC
10
11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13 ) Case No.: 2:21-cv-9089
)
14 LALTITUDE LLC, a California limited )
liability company, ) PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR:
15 )
)
16 Plaintiff, ) 1) DESIGN PATENT
) INFRINGEMENT
17 )
vs. ) 2) UNFAIR COMPETITION
18 )
)
SHENZHEN JINNUO PRECISION )
19 )
PRODUCTS CO., LTD., a Chinese
business entity of form unknown; )
20 )
SHENZHEN WYN-WORLD )
21 )
TECHNOLOGY LTD., a Chinese
)
22 corporation; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, )
) JURY TRIAL DEMAND
23 )
Defendants. )
24 )
25
26
27
28
COMPLAINT
Case 2:21-cv-09089 Document 1 Filed 11/19/21 Page 2 of 9 Page ID #:2
COMPLAINT
Case 2:21-cv-09089 Document 1 Filed 11/19/21 Page 3 of 9 Page ID #:3
1 No. 1002 Huaqiang Road, Futian District, Shenzhen, 518000, China. Defendant
2 Wyn-World is the registered trademark owner for United States Trademark
3 Registration No. 5497097 for the mark “WYNCO,” which is the brand under which
4 the Infringing Product is being offered for sale and sold on Amazon.com.
5 7. The true names and capacities, whether individual, corporate, associate,
6 or otherwise, of Defendants DOES 1 through 10, inclusive (individual a “Doe
7 Defendant” and collectively, “Doe Defendants”), are unknown to Plaintiff at this
8 time, and Plaintiff, therefore, sues Doe Defendants by such fictitious names. Plaintiff
9 will ask leave of Court to amend this Complaint when the same shall have been
10 ascertained. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and based thereon alleges that each
11 Doe Defendant was responsible intentionally, or in some other actionable manner
12 for the events and happenings referred to herein, which proximately caused injury
13 and damage to Plaintiff, as hereafter alleged. Any reference to Defendants shall refer
14 to each named Defendant and all Doe Defendants, and to each of them. Any
15 reference to a particular Defendant shall refer to the named Defendant only.
16 8. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that
17 Defendants are responsible for their acts and for their conduct, which are the true
18 legal causes of the damages herein alleged.
19 JURISDICTION AND VENUE
20 9. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action under
21 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 (federal question), 1338(a) (patent infringement), and 1332
22 (diversity of citizenship).
23 10. Personal jurisdiction as to these Defendants is conferred on this Court
24 because Defendants have purposefully availed themselves of the benefits and
25 privileges of transacting business within the State of California. In particular, on
26 multiple occasions, Defendants have sold products to customers within the State of
27 California on Amazon’s online platform (www.amazon.com).
28 11. This Court also has personal jurisdiction over Defendants because
3
COMPLAINT
Case 2:21-cv-09089 Document 1 Filed 11/19/21 Page 4 of 9 Page ID #:4
1 Defendants have caused injury to Plaintiff within the State of California and within
2 this judicial district. Defendants have committed and continue to commit unlawful
3 acts expressly aimed at Plaintiff in California, knowing that the brunt of the harm
4 resulting from this conduct will be suffered by Plaintiff in California.
5 12. Venue is proper in the Central District of California under 28 U.S.C. §
6 1391(b) and (c) in that a substantial injury occurred and continues to occur in this
7 District, a substantial part of the subject property is located here, Defendants’
8 conduct has been directed into this District, and a substantial portion of the events
9 that are the subject of this action took place in this District.
10 FACTUAL BACKGROUND
11 13. On December 25, 2013, a design patent application for a “Bluetooth
12 shower speaker” was filed with the United States Patent Office (USPTO). On
13 November 3, 2015, the Patent was duly and lawfully issued by the USPTO. The
14 Patent has an anticipated expiration date of November 3, 2029. A true and correct
15 copy of the Patent is attached hereto as EXHIBIT A.
16 14. Plaintiff is the true owner of all rights, title, and interest in the Patent
17 that encompasses the Bluetooth shower speaker design. Plaintiff possesses the right
18 to sue for and obtain equitable relief and damages for infringement of the Patent.
19 15. The success and novelty of the Patent prompted third parties, including
20 Defendants, to manufacture and/or distribute blatant counterfeits of Plaintiff’s
21 innovative design to compete with and infringe the Patent. See EXHIBIT B for
22 examples of Defendants’ infringement of the Patent.
23 16. Defendants have directly infringed and continue to directly infringe the
24 Patent by making, using, selling, and offering for sale in the United States, and/or
25 importing into the United States the Infringing Product (exemplified in EXHIBIT
26 B), embodying the invention defined by one or more claims of the Patent, without
27 authority or license from Plaintiff. More particularly, Defendants have infringed and
28 continue to infringe at least Claim 1 of the Patent because Infringing Product is
4
COMPLAINT
Case 2:21-cv-09089 Document 1 Filed 11/19/21 Page 5 of 9 Page ID #:5
18
19
20
21 19. To address Defendants’ infringement, beginning on or around October
22 27, 2021, Plaintiff filed at least three (3) takedown notices against Defendants’
24 Plaintiff was left with no choice but to resolve this dispute in a formalized
25 proceeding.
COMPLAINT
Case 2:21-cv-09089 Document 1 Filed 11/19/21 Page 6 of 9 Page ID #:6
1 21. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that
2 Defendants were aware of Plaintiff’s rights before they began their infringing
3 activities. Defendants’ use and infringement is therefore willful.
4 FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF
5 Design Patent Infringement – 35 U.S.C. § 271
6 22. Plaintiff hereby restates and realleges the allegations set forth in
7 paragraphs 1 through 21 above and incorporates them by reference.
8 23. Plaintiff is the sole owner of the entire right, title, and interest in the
9 Patent, which was duly and lawfully issued by the USPTO.
10 24. Defendants have, and continue to, knowingly, intentionally, and
11 willfully infringe the Patent by selling, offering for sale, and/or importing the
12 Infringing Product that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially
13 similar to the claim of the Patent.
14 25. Defendants undertook their acts of infringement of the Patent without
15 permission or license.
16 26. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that
17 Defendants had actual knowledge of Plaintiff’s right in the design claimed in the
18 Patent. Defendants’ actions constitute reckless disregard for Plaintiff’s patent rights
19 or otherwise willful and intentional infringement of the Patent.
20 27. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ acts of infringement,
21 Defendants have derived and received gains, profits, and advantages in an amount
22 that is not presently known to Plaintiff.
23 28. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284, Plaintiff is entitled to damages for
24 Defendants’ infringing acts and treble damages together with interest and cost as
25 fixed by this Court.
26 29. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285, Plaintiff is entitled to reasonable attorneys’
27 fees for the necessity of bringing this claim.
28 30. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 289, Plaintiff is entitled to recover Defendants’
6
COMPLAINT
Case 2:21-cv-09089 Document 1 Filed 11/19/21 Page 7 of 9 Page ID #:7
COMPLAINT
Case 2:21-cv-09089 Document 1 Filed 11/19/21 Page 8 of 9 Page ID #:8
COMPLAINT
Case 2:21-cv-09089 Document 1 Filed 11/19/21 Page 9 of 9 Page ID #:9
1 35 U.S.C. § 285;
2 I. Pre-judgment and post-judgment interest and costs in bringing this
3 action against Defendants; and
4 J. Such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.
5 DEMAND FOR A JURY TRIAL
6 Pursuant to Rule 38(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff
7 requests a jury trial of all issues that may be tried to a jury in this action.
8
9 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 19th day of November, 2021.
10
11 OMNI LEGAL GROUP
12
13 /s/ Omid E. Khalifeh
14 Omid E. Khalifeh
Ariana Santoro
15 Lara A. Petersen
16 Attorneys for Plaintiff,
LALTITUDE LLC
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COMPLAINT
Case 2:21-cv-09089 Document 1-1 Filed 11/19/21 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:10
EXHIBIT A
Case 2:21-cv-09089 Document 1-1 Filed 11/19/21 Page 2 of 11 Page ID #:11
USOOD7423.59S
FIG.1
Case 2:21-cv-09089 Document 1-1 Filed 11/19/21 Page 4 of 11 Page ID #:13
I/
//f f
/ \\ YN.
\ \ .
s f/ vy
---- --------------- ------
------ ---------
- letter-
- - -Ss
----------
FIG.2
Case 2:21-cv-09089 Document 1-1 Filed 11/19/21 Page 5 of 11 Page ID #:14
TOE:
FIG.3
Case 2:21-cv-09089 Document 1-1 Filed 11/19/21 Page 6 of 11 Page ID #:15
FG4
Case 2:21-cv-09089 Document 1-1 Filed 11/19/21 Page 7 of 11 Page ID #:16
--
---------- -
M -------
----------
--------- ---Y-
------ -------
- -- al
FIG.5
Case 2:21-cv-09089 Document 1-1 Filed 11/19/21 Page 8 of 11 Page ID #:17
FIG.6
Case 2:21-cv-09089 Document 1-1 Filed 11/19/21 Page 9 of 11 Page ID #:18
--e-c
2
2sees S.
-"-- s
1-2----
1. "I" ... --- is
SS
? -- n
//
N
N N Ya
N. s -,
YSSisst - a 2-1
-
s
Ss -., -a---
FIG.7
Case 2:21-cv-09089 Document 1-1 Filed 11/19/21 Page 10 of 11 Page ID #:19
EXHIBIT B
Case 2:21-cv-09089 Document 1-1 Filed 11/19/21 Page 11 of 11 Page ID #:20