CHAPTER TWO: THE PROJECT CYCLE

2.1. Meaning and definition of project life cycle

There tends to be a natural sequence in the way projects are planned and carried out. Before
any project is actually realized it goes through various planning phases Therefore, the
different stages through which project planning proceeds from inception to implementation
are often called “the project cycle”. It is the project’s life cycle through which it advances
from infancy to maturity. The main features of this process are information gathering,
analysis, and decision making.

The stages or phases through which the project passes are necessary for its completion and
they constitute a specific sequence that is cyclical in nature identified as project life cycle.
Dividing project life cycle into phases helps in better management and control of a project.

The project cycle considers various stages in which each stage not only is grown out of the
proceeding ones, but also leads into the subsequent ones. The planning process does not
contain such a stringent sequence of events since all aspects of the project have to be
considered simultaneously and, if necessary, adjusted to one another.

Therefore, projects cycle is a self – renewing cycle in that new projects may grow out of the
old ones in a continuous process and self – sustaining cycle of activity.

Project life cycle models

Like the definitions of a project, there are different project life cycle models which differ in
their perspective, emphasis and level of detail. The commonly known models include the

 World Bank project life cycle or sometimes called Baum Cycle (Baum, 1982)
consisting of identification, preparation, appraisal, implementation and
evaluation phases,

 Integrated Project Planning and Management Cycle – IPPMC – (Goodman,

1988) which is divided into four phases: phase-1 consisting of planning,
appraisal and design; phase-2 consisting of selection, approval and activation;
phase-3 consisting of operation, control and handover; and phase-4 consisting of
evaluation and refinement.

 UNIDO project life cycle (Behrens and Hawranek, 1991) consisting of pre-
investment, investment and operational phases, and

Page 1
Although, the aforementioned models use different terminologies and divide the project life
cycle into different number of phases, the very essence of project life cycle is that projects are
first identified in the form of ideas followed by different types of studies to determine their
feasibility, execution of the feasible one/s, use of the outputs of the project to deliver goods
and services (operating and maintain project output) and assessment of whether the projects
support the organization in achieving its goals.

The phases identified in each model are further divided into detailed steps. Subsequent
chapters provide descriptions of the basic phases of a project life cycle and the stages
involved in each phase. Chapter-3 covers project identification and preliminary studies,
chapter 4 cover project feasibility study and appraisal while chapter 5 covers project
implementation, monitoring and evaluation.

As is in the case with aspects of project analysis, there are many equally valid ways in which
the project cycle may be divided. There are various models that deal with the project cycle.
However, here we give more emphasis on the Basic Models – The Baum’s cycle and other
models such as UNIDO project cycle and. DEPSA’s (Dev’t project studies authority)

2.1 World Bank Project Cycle (The Baum Cycle)

Project with the characteristics already outlined above typically run through at least several
separable stages of activity which can be thought of as constituting a definite sequence that
some author’s /institutions/ have called a project cycle.

The first basic model of a project cycle is that of Baum (1970), which has been adopted by
the World Bank and initially recognized four main stages, namely.

1. Identification

2. Preparation

3. Appraisal and Selection

4. Implementation

At a later stage (in 1978) the author has added an additional stage called “Evaluation” which
usually closes the cycle as it gives rise to the identification of new projects. Thus making the
stages 5 in number.

These processes can usefully be considered as a comprehensive sequence in the sense that for
the project that is implemented, each stage naturally follows the proceeding one and leads on

Page 2
to the next. Actually, the division into stages is artificial, but it helps us to understand that
project planning, though a continuous process over time, has distinct phases and stages.

Throughout the project cycle the primary preoccupation of the analyst is to consider
alternatives, evaluate them, and to make decisions as to which of them should be advanced to
the next stage. Thus, each of Baum’s main stages are discussed briefly below

2.2.1 Identification

The first stage in the cycle is to find potential projects. Some sources of projects are given
here.

 Some may be “resource based” and stem from the opportunity to make profitable use
of available resources.

 Some projects may be “market based” arising from an identified demand in home or
overseas markets.

 Others may be “need-based” where the purpose is to try to make available to all
people in an area of minimal amounts of certain basic material requirements and
services.

 Well – informed technical specialists and local leaders are also common sources of
projects. Technical specialists will have identified many areas where they feel new
investment might be profitable, while local leaders may have suggestion about where
investment might be carried out.

 Ideas for new projects also come from proposals to extend existing programs.

In general, most projects start as an elementary idea. Eventually, some simple ideas are
elaborated into a form to which the title “project” can be formally applied.

2.2.2 Preparation (pre – feasibility or feasibility studies)

Once projects have been identified, there begins a process of progressively more detailed
preparation and analysis of project plans. At this stage the project is being seriously
considered as a definite investment action.

Project preparation (project formulation) covers the establishment of technical, economic and
financial feasibility. Decisions have to be made on the scope of the project, location and site,
soil and hydrological requirements, project size (farm or factory size) etc

Page 3
Resource base investigations are undertaken and alternative forms of projects are explored.
Complete technical specifications of distinct proposals accompanied by full details of
financial and economic costs and benefits are the out come of the project preparation stage.
The project now exists as a set of tangible proposals.

Project design and formulation is an area in which local and international consultants are very
active especially for big project that cover large areas and have big budgets.

2.2.3 Appraisal

After a project has been prepared, it is generally appropriate for a critical review or an
independent appraisal to be conducted. This provides an opportunity to re-examine every
aspect of the project plan to assess whether the proposal is appropriate and sound before large
sums are committed.

Generally, internal government staffs only are used for this work and not consultants and
projects are appraised both in the field and at the desk level. Appraisals should cover at least
seven aspects of a project, each of which must have been given special consideration during
the project preparation phase:

a) Technical – here the appraisals concentrate in verifying whether what is proposed

will work in the way suggested or not.

b) Financial – the appraisals try to see if the requirements for money needed by the
project have been calculated property, their sources are all identified, and reasonable
plans for their repayment are made where necessary.

c) Commercial – the way the necessary inputs for the project are conceived to be
supplied is examined and the arrangements for the disposal of the products are
verified.

d) Incentive – the appraisals see to it whether things are arranged in such a way that all
those whose participation is required will find it in their interest to take part in the
project, at least to the extent envisaged in the plan.

e) Economic – the appraisal here tries to see whether what is proposed is good from the
viewpoint of the national economic development interest when all project effects
(positive and negative) are taken into account and check if all are correctly valued.

f) Managerial – this aspect of the appraisal examines if the capacity exists for
operating the project and see if those responsible ones can operate it satisfactorily.

Page 4
 Moreover, it tries to see if the responsible are given sufficient power and scope to do
what is required.

g) Organizational – the appraisal examines the project if it is organized internally and

externally into units, contract policy institution, etc so as to allow the proposals to be
carried out properly and to allow for change as the project develops.

These issues are the subjects of specialized appraisal report. And on the basis of this report,
financial decisions are made – whether to go ahead with the project or not. In practice, there
can be quite a sequence of project selection decisions. Following appraisal, some projects
may be discarded.

If the project involves loan finance, the lender will almost certainly wish to carry out his own
appraisal before completing negotiations with the borrower. Comments made at the appraisal
stage frequently give rise to alterations in the project plan (project proposal).

2.2.4 Implementation

The objective of any effort in project planning and analysis clearly is to have a project that
can be implemented to the benefit of the society. Thus, implementation is perhaps the most
important part of the project cycle.

In this stage, funds are actually disbursed to get the project started and keep running. A major
priority during this stage is to ensure that the project is carried out in the way and within the
period that was planned. Problems frequently occur when the economic and financial
environment at implementation differs from the situation expected during appraisal.

Frequently original proposals are modified, though usually only with difficulty, because of
the need to get agreement between the parties involved.

It is during implementation that many of the real problems of projects are first identified.
Because of this, the feedback effect on the discovery and design of new projects and the
deficiencies in the capabilities of the project actor can be revealed.

Therefore, to allow the management to become aware of the difficulties that might arise,
recording, monitoring and progress reporting are important activities during the
implementation stage. There are some aspects of implementation that are of particular
relevance to project planning and analysis.

i. The first is that the better and more realistic a project plan is, the more likely it is
that the plan can be carried out and the expected benefit realized. This

Page 5
 emphasizes once again the need for careful attention to each aspect of project
planning and analysis.

ii. The second is that project implementation must be flexible. Circumstances will
change and project managers must be able to respond intelligently to these
changes.

The common ones are technical changes (soils, water logging, nitrogen application) price
changes economic changes, political changes and these will alter the ways in which it should
be implemented.

2.2.5 Evaluation

The final phase in the project cycle is evaluation. Once a project has been carried out, it is
often useful, (though not always done) to look back over what took place, to compare actual
progress with the plans, and to judge whether the decisions and actions taken were
responsible and useful.

The extent to which the objectives of a project are being realized provides the primary
criterion for an evaluation. The analyst looks systematically at the elements of success and
failure in the project experience to learn how better to plan for the future.

Evaluation is not limited only to completed projects. It is a most important managerial tool in
ongoing projects and rather formalized evaluation may take place at several times in the life
of a project.

Evaluation may be undertaken when the project is in trouble, as the first step in a re-planning
effort. Careful evaluation should precede any effort to plan follow – up projects. And,
finally, evaluation should be undertaken when a project is terminated or is well into routine
operation.

Many different people may do evaluation.

- Project management will be continuously evaluating its experience as implementation

proceeds.

- The sponsoring agency, perhaps the operating ministry, the planning agency or an
external assistance agency – may undertake evaluation.

Page 6
 - In large and innovative projects, the project’s administrative structure may provide a
separate evaluation unit responsible for monitoring the projects implementation and
for bringing problems to the attention of the projects’ management.

Evaluation can help not only in the management of the project after the initial phase, but will
also help in the planning of future projects.

Experience with one project can give rise to new ideas for extension of the project, repetition,
the need for “vertically” associated projects, which supply, inputs to or process products from
this project, and other ideas which become the seeds or new project proposals.

The Baum cycle (adapted by the world bank in 1970)

Preparation

Appraisal

Identification

Implementation

Evaluation

2.3 UNIDO – Project Cycle

UNIDO has established a project cycle comprising three distinct phases):

 The pre investment phase,

 Investment phase and

 Operational phase phases.

The pre- investment phase comprises:

 project identification,

 project preparation and

Page 7
  Appraisal of project studies.

The investment phase constitutes negotiation and contracting, engineering design,

construction and preproduction marketing. And the operational phase includes
commissioning and starts up of production, replacement and rehabilitation, and expansion
and innovation.

Actually, this division is artificial but it helps to understand that project planning is a
continuous process over time. Throughout the project cycle the primary preoccupation of the
analyst is to consider alternatives, evaluate them, and to make decisions on which of them
should be advanced to the next stage.

With the clear understanding that project planning is an uninterrupted process, we shall
discuss the investigation work to be carried out at each stage of planning starting with project
identification. The stage of project implementation will not be covered thoroughly: we only
touch upon it in passing. This is not because project execution is of minor importance; on the
contrary, because of its significance in transforming project expectations into realities it
deserves a separate chapter. The same applies to the stage of operation and post-evaluation
which some authors include in the project cycle.

1. THE PRE INVESTMENT PHASE

The pre investment phase comprises several stages: identification of investment

opportunities (opportunity studies), project preparation (pre-feasibility and feasibility studies)
and project appraisal (preparation project investment decisions report).

i. Project Identification

Project identification amounts to finding projects which could contribute towards achieving
specified development objectives. In principle, especially in developing countries like
Ethiopia, project identification should be an integral part of the macro-planning exercise with
sectoral information and strategies as the main source of project ideas. In practice, however,
projects are not always derived from national and sectoral plans; they originate from multiple
sources such as investment promotion agencies, private consultants and private investors.
Irrespective of their origin project ideas should, in general, aim at: overcoming constraints to
the development effort, be they material, human or institutional constraints; or, meeting
unsatisfied needs and demand for goods and services. Constraints, needs and demand should

Page 8
be interpreted broadly to include, for example, foreign exchange constraints that might
necessitate projects for import substitution or export promotion.

a) Opportunity studies:

The identification of investment opportunities is the starting – point in a series of investment

– related activities, when potential investors (private or public) are interested in obtaining
information on newly identified viable investment opportunities.

Where does Projects Originate? The variety of projects makes it impossible to prepare an
exhaustive list of sources from where project ideas emanate; much depends on the
experience, and even imagination, of those entrusted with project creation. In general, we
can distinguish two levels where project ideas are born: the macro-level and the micro-level.
At the macro-level, project ideas emerge from:

i. national, sectoral,, or regional plans and strategies supplemented by special

studies, often called opportunity studies, conducted with the explicit aim of
translating national and sectoral programs into specific projects;

ii. constraints in the development process due to shortages of essential infrastructure

facilities, problems in the balance of payments, etc.;

iii. A government’s decision to correct social and regional inequalities or to satisfy

basic needs of the people through development projects;

iv. a possible external threat that necessitates projects aiming at achieving, for
example, self-sufficiency in basic materials, energy, transportation, etc.;

v. Unusual events such as droughts, floods, earth-quakes, hostilities, etc.; and

vi. A government’s decision to create locally project implementing capacity in such

areas as construction etc.

At the macro-level, project ideas can also originate from multilateral or bilateral
development agencies and as a result of regional or international agreements in which a
country participates.

At the micro-level, the variety of sources is equally broad. Project ideas emanate from:

i. The identification of unsatisfied demand or needs;

ii. The existence of unused or underutilized natural or human resources and the
perception of opportunities for their efficient use;

Page 9
 iii. The need to remove shortages in essential materials, services or facilities that
constrain the development effort;

iv. The initiative of private or public enterprises in response to incentives provided by

the government;

v. The necessity to complement or expand investments previously undertaken; and

vi. The desire of local groups or organizations to enhance their economic

independence and improve their welfare.

Project proposals could also originate from foreign firms either in response to government
investment incentives or, because they consider local production a better way to secure a
substantial share of the domestic market for their products.

Opportunity studies are rather sketchy in nature and rely more on aggregate estimates rather
than on detailed analysis. Cost data are usually taken from comparable existing projects and
not from quotations of sources such as suppliers. Depending on the prevailing situation,
either a general opportunity study (sector approach) or a specific opportunity study
(enterprise approach) or both will have to be undertaken.

General opportunity studies*

General opportunity study may be divided into three categories:

 Area studies to identify opportunities in a given area

 Industry studies to identify opportunities in a delimited industrial branch

 Resource-based studies to reveal opportunities based on the utilization of natural

resources

Specific project opportunity studies*

A specific project opportunity study may be defined as the transformation of a project idea
into a broad investment proposition. This study usually springs from general opportunity
studies, in the form of products with the potential for domestic manufacture. The purpose of
Specific project opportunity studies is to arrive at a quick and inexpensive determination of
the salient facts of an investment possibility. It therefore should not involve any substantial
cost in it preparation (Project identification will be discussed in detail in chapter 3).

b) Preliminary Screening: Once some project ideas have been put forward, the first
step is to select one or more of them as potentially viable. This calls for a quick

Page 10
 preliminary screening by experienced professionals who could also modify some of
the proposals. At this stage the screening criteria are vague and rough, becoming
specific and refined as project planning advances. During preliminary selection the
analyst should eliminate project proposals that are technically unsound and risky;
have no market for the output; have inadequate supply of inputs; are very costly in
relation to benefits; assume overambitious sales and profitability; etc.

Obviously, since the criteria are imprecise much depends on the experience and impartiality
of the professionals applying them. It is, however, necessary to conduct this screening, even
with indistinct criteria, in order to reduce to a manageable number the project alternatives to
which more work and time will be devoted. After all, project planning is a process of
elimination, i.e. elimination of inferior alternatives.

c) Pre-feasibility Studies: Following the preliminary screening, promising project

options should be investigated in a systematic manner. This requires the preparation
of brief reports that indicate in sufficient, but not painstaking, detail the project
versions that are still promising and suggest which ones should be eliminated.
Sophisticated analysis, of the technical, financial, economic social and institutional
aspects of the project are postponed to a later stage before assigning larger funds for
such a study, since feasibility studies are costly and time-consuming.

However, the reports should indicate which of these aspects deserve particular attention
during the subsequent step. Reports of this type are often called pre-feasibility or pre-
investment.

The objectives of the pre- feasibility study are to determine whether:

 All possible project alternatives have been examined

 The project idea justifies a detailed analysis by a feasibility study

 Any aspects of the project are critical to the project that may require in depth
investigation through functional studies

 Environmental situation at the planned site and the potential impact of the projected,
production process are in line with national standards.

A pre – feasibility study should be viewed as an intermediate stage between a project

opportunity study and a detailed feasibility study, the difference being in the degree of detail
of the information obtained and the intensity with which project alternative are discussed.

Page 11
The structure of a pre – feasibility study should be the same as that of a detailed feasibility
study.

Content of the Pre-feasibility Study: To enable the relevant authorities to decide on the
merits of various project options, the pre-feasibility study should, although briefly, discuss:

i. The structure and objectives of the project;

ii. The nature and size of the demand for the output or the needs that it would satisfy,
together with the foreseen beneficiary groups;

iii. The availability of the most important materials and human inputs;

iv. Basic alternative technologies available and their merits and weaknesses;

v. Approximate investment and operation costs as well as expected revenues and

other benefits;

vi. Rough estimates of financial and economic returns;

vii. Any major factor that is likely to have an important effect on the project; and

viii. What further information on the technical, financial, economic or institutional

aspects of the project should be acquired through special studies and surveys?

By the end of the identification stage we should know:

a) Whether further detailed work is justified;

b) What major issues have been identified, what project alternatives have been
considered and which of them have been rejected; and

c) A rough estimate of costs.

For projects that still look promising, a specific work plan for the next stage should also be
included in the study.

Functional (support) studies

Functional or support studies cover specific aspects of a project and are required as
Prerequisites for, or in support of, pre-feasibility studies and feasibility studies, especially for
large-scale investment proposals. Examples of such studies include the following:

 Market studies of products to be manufactured, including demand projections in the

market and the anticipated penetration

Page 12
  Raw material and factory supplies, covering current and projected availability and
price trends

 Laboratory and pilot-plant tests, done to the extent necessary to determine raw
material suitability

 Location studies

 Environmental impact assessment

 Economies of scale studies

 Equipment selection studies

When a basic input may be a decisive factor in determining the viability of a project, the
support study is carried out before commissioning a pre-feasibility study. In most cases the
results of a pre feasibility study, when undertaken prior or together with a feasibility study
form an integral part of the latter and lessen its burden and cost.

ii. Project Preparation – Feasibility Studies

A feasibility study should provide all data necessary for an investment decision. The
commercial, technical, financial, economic and environment prerequisites for an investment
project should therefore be defined and critically examined on the basis of alternative
solutions already reviewed in the pre – feasibility study.

If the pre-feasibility study indicates that the project is, prima facie, promising and further
work is justified, the project enters the stage of preparation. The project, already defined in a
sketchy form, is now being advanced to a level at which it can be appraised thoroughly
before a decision is taken on whether to implement it. The analysis of the project’s
marketing, technical, financial, economic and institutional aspects should be comprehensive
enough to allow the policy makers to decide on the future of the project with confidence.
Project preparation takes the form of a feasibility study conducted by the agency sponsoring
the project or by consultants. At this point it would be helpful to address a question often
raised, i.e. What is the difference between a pre- feasibility and a feasibility study? The
answer is simple: they differ only with respect to the amount of work needed to decide if a
project is viable. The table of contents is the same in both; it is the details and the
sophistication that vary.

Page 13
 How Much Preparation: At this point we can ask how far in detail should project
preparation advance before the project is ready for appraisal. This is a practical question and
the answer depends upon the magnitude and the characteristics of the project. Projects that
commit relatively small amounts of investment funds do not deserve painstaking and
expensive preparation. After all, the risks taken in implementing small projects are small; of
course, what is small is a practical question. Furthermore, projects that: (i) consist of a large
number of small, dispersed components (e.g. hundreds of primary schools or village water
supplies) or, (ii) depend heavily on community participation, need not be prepared in detail
before an investment decision is made.

Often, those responsible for project planning complain that too much information is asked
from them and that they have to spend unnecessarily long time in project preparation. In
most cases their complaints are not justified. They should realize that resources are scarce
and mistakes expensive. Furthermore, time spent on project preparation is not lost time.
There is a trade-off between project preparation and implementation. The better a project is
prepared the easier and faster its implementation and the lower the probability of cost
overruns.

The need for professional project preparation does not imply that this stage should include
engineering design that precedes implementation and which provides more accurate cost
estimates. However, it is essential that the project is prepared to a level that its characteristics
are clearly presented, its objectives and beneficiaries accurately defined and its merits and
shortcomings thoroughly discussed. It is only on such a sound base that apprized judgment
can be formed by the authorities responsible for investment decisions. Obviously, when it is
expected that the project will be financed entirely or partly by multilateral or bilateral aid
agencies, their specific requirements and standards of project preparation should be taken into
account.

Before proceeding to the stage of project appraisal we should mention that pre-feasibility and
feasibility studies become much easier to conduct when precise and comprehensive terms of
reference are prepared for these studies. Issued to a working group of local experts or to
outside consultants, the terms of reference should make clear that the project should be
researched carefully and all its aspects illuminated. Those responsible for planning the
project should be asked to provide, as a minimum, in their report the information mentioned
in these Guidelines and to follow the methodology adopted here.

Page 14
 iii. Appraisal and Investment Decision

Up to the completion of preparation, the project has been nursed by the sponsoring agency;
now it changes hands. The project proposal in the form of a feasibility study is submitted to
the investment decision makers for a broad and impartial appraisal. Appraisal is the
comprehensive and systematic assessment of all aspects of the proposed project. After
appraising the project carefully, appraisers will decide whether it will be implemented or not,
with or without minor modifications.

Criteria and Questions: At the early stages of the project cycle we might say that the
evaluation criteria are mainly, but not exclusively, technical and micro-economic in
character. It is at this stage, and before an investment commitment is made, that the project
should be reviewed again to confirm that it accords with the broad development objectives, or
criteria set by donors, or bankers or other parties who have a stake in the project. The
framework within which the project is appraised is broad and multi-faceted.

An investment decision should be based on careful consideration of macro-development and

project perspectives to ensure that the project represents a high-priority use of the investors’
resources. During appraisal, it should be verified that the project, in combination with other
policies, contributes the maximum possible towards achieving certain development
objectives.

To this end the following questions could be answered to the viability of a project:

i. Does the project belong to a sector where the country needs additional
investment?

ii. Does the project meet urgent needs of the sector, that is, does it reflect sound
sub-sector allocations;

iii. Does the project represent the least-cost alternative in achieving sector and sub-
sector objectives?

iv. Is the project of optimum size, too big or too small?

v. is the timing of the project right or the proposed investment is premature;

vi. is the project well designed with reasonably accurate cost and benefit estimates or
are there still many loose ends; and

Page 15
 vii. If the proposed project is not implemented, what other opportunities exist to use
the same resources (physical, human, and financial).

How smoothly the appraisal will proceed depends on how well the project has been
prepared. Even this indicative list of questions shows that a meaningful appraisal is possible
only if the project has been carefully and professionally researched and planned.

Appraisal Perspectives: Considered always within the broad development framework, the
project, during appraisal, is viewed from different perspectives.

1) Technical: On the technical side, we must be sure that alternatives have been
diligently considered and that the selected one provides sound solutions.

2) Commercial: Appraisal of the commercial aspect amounts to verifying that the

markets for the output and the inputs of the project have been thoroughly investigated,
including the channels of distribution and supply.

3) Financial: From the financial viewpoint, appraisal aims at ensuring that the
necessary funds to implement and operate the project will be available timely and
whether the project is financially viable.

4) Economic: The economic appraisal of the project relates closely to its technical
aspect. Of course, during project preparation cost-benefit analysis should ensure that
the technological solutions adopted are those that best fit the conditions prevailing in
the country and are not simply the most advanced ones. However, the appraisal stage
is where the final review and evaluation of these matters are made.

5) Managerial: From the managerial angle we should check whether the proposed top
management and key staff are adequate for the prompt implementation and smooth
operation of the project. Finally, the organizational structure of the project is
reviewed to ensure that it provides for: sufficient degree of autonomy; functional
allocation of responsibilities and decision making; and a general administrative
mechanism conducive to the efficient operation of the project.

To the appraisal of these aspects of the project we can add the review of, and a judgment
about its non-economic dimensions, e.g. dependency for key inputs and outputs on unreliable
foreign markets. The nature and range of the non-economic aspects vary from project to

Page 16
project and relate to the stated objectives of the development strategy and the conditions in
the country.

2. THE INVESTMENT PHASE

The Project in Motion

The next stage in the project is the actual implementation of the project, followed by
operation. Implementation begins immediately after the final decision on the project ends
when it starts rendering the benefits envisaged. While in earlier stages of project planning
there was more thinking and less action, in this stage the combination switches in favor of
the latter: more action and less thinking is needed. It is the time when the conclusions
reached and the decisions made are put into action. Detailed engineering design comprises
preparatory work for site preparation, the final selection of construction planning and time –
scheduling of factory construction, as well as the preparation of flow charts, scale drawing
and a wide variety of layouts.

During the stage of tendering and evaluation of bids it is especially important to receive
comprehensive tenders for goods and services for the project from a sufficiently large number
of national and international supplies of proven efficiency and with good delivery capacity.

Negotiations and contracting are concerned with the legal obligations arising from the
acquisition of technology the construction of buildings, the purchase and installation of
machinery and equipment and financing. This stage covers the signing of contracts between
the investor or entrepreneur, on the one hand, and the financing institutions, consultants,
architects and suppliers of raw materials and required inputs, on the other.

The construction stage involves site preparation, construction of buildings and other civil
works, together with the erection and installation of equipment in accordance with proper
programming and scheduling.

The personnel recruitment and training stage, which should proceed simultaneously with the
construction stage, may prove very crucial for the expected growth of productivity and
efficiency in plant operations.

Of particular relevance is the timely initiation of marketing arrangements to prepare the

market for the new products (pre – production marketing) and secure critical supplies (supply
marketing).

Page 17
Plant commissioning and start up is usually a brief but technically critical span in project
implementation. It links the proceeding construction phase and the following operational
(production) phase. These are complicated and interrelated activities that should be
programmed carefully and executed diligently if delays and problems are to be avoided, or at
least minimized.

In general, it is to be noted that in the pre – investment phase, the quality and dependability of
the project are more important than the time factor, while in the investment phase, the time
factor is more critical in order to keep the project within the forecast made in the feasibility
study.

The phase is divided into the following stages:

1) Establishing the legal, financial and organizational basis for the implementation of
the project.

2) Technology acquisition and transfer, including basic engineering.

3) Detailed engineering design and contracting, including tendering, evaluation of bids

and negotiations. Detailed engineering design will include site preparation final
selection of technology construction planning and time scheduling as well as flow
charts and scale drawings preparation. Negotiations are concerned with legal
obligations arising from the acquisition of technology, construction of buildings,
purchase and installation of machinery, and financing

4) Acquisition of land construction work and installation. This involves site preparation
construction of buildings and other civil works, together with erection and installation
of equipment

5) Pre-production marketing, including the securing of supplies and setting up of the

administration of the firm. This and secures critical supplies prepares the market for
the new product

6) Recruitment and training of personnel. This stage proceeds simultaneously with the
construction stage to ensure timely commissioning and the expected growth in
productivity and efficiency in plant operations.

7) Plant commissioning and start-up. It is usually a brief but technically critical span in
project implementation. It links the preceding construction phase with the operational
(production) phase. The success achieved in this stage demonstrates the effectiveness

Page 18
 of implementation planning and execution of the project and has a bearing on the
future performance of the project.

The need to pay particular attention to project implementation can not be overemphasized.
No matter how carefully a project has been prepared and evaluated, the expected benefits are
realized only when it is properly implemented; it is not project reports but studiously
executed projects that deliver the envisaged benefits. Of course, it is easier to execute a well
prepared project but sound preparation is not a substitute for careful programming and close
control during implementation. This is all the more so because most projects face problems
during implementation and some of them can not be identified in advance; they emerge as we
proceed in the execution of the project. Some implementation problems are the result of
general factors such as changes in the economic and political situation of the country or the
world market while others are project specific.

3) OPERATIONAL PHASE

This is the production phase that commences after commissioning and start-up. The resultant
challenges of this phase are viewed from the short-term perspective and long-term
perspective. In the shot-term challenges may arise with regard to application of production
techniques operation of equipment, inadequate labor productivity due to a lack of qualified
staff and labor etc. Most of these problems have their origin in the implementation phase.

The long-term view relate to the chosen strategies and the associated production and
marketing costs as well as sales revenues. These have a direct relationship on the projections
made during the pre-investment phase. If such strategies and projection prove faulty any
remedial measure will not only prove difficult but may be too expensive.

Page 19
 UNIDO PROJECT LIFECYCLE

Pre-selection
Pre-feasibility study

Preparation
Identification
Feasibility study
Opportunity study
Support Studies
Expansion
Pre investment
phase
Innovation Operating Appraisal
phase Report

Replacement Investment
phase
Negotiations and
Rehabilitation contracting

Engineering Design
Commissioning & start up

Construction

Pre-production marketing

Training

2.4 DEPSA’s Project Cycle

There are various ways in which the project cycle may be viewed and portrayed depending
on the purpose, emphasis and detail required to illustrate.

According to the Guidelines to project planning in Ethiopia (1990) of Development Project

Studies Authority (DEPSA), the project cycle comprises three major phases.

1. Pre – investment

2. Investment and

Page 20
 3. Operation

Each of these three phases may be divided into stages. The Guidelines has divided the
Project cycle into six stages

1. Identification

2. Preparation

3. Appraisal/decision

4. Implementation

5. Operation

6. Ex-post evaluation

The pre – investment phase consists of the first–three stages, the investment phase includes
the fourth stage and the operation phase covers the last two stages.

In reality, these are somewhat artificial, but do serve to emphasis the need to think of project
planning as a process of decision-making taking place over time. Broadly speaking, what is
important about this process is that it should begin with the identification of a number of
alternatives, using existing information and gathering new data in such a way as to limit
alternatives under consideration to those few, which are most promising.

Throughout the project cycle the primary preoccupation of the analyst is to consider
alternatives, evaluate them, and to make decisions as to which of them should be advanced to
the next stage.

In short, the project planning process is essentially one of eliminating and the planner
naturally hopes that the best alternative will emerge.

In this process:

I. The results (output) of a given stage serve as the input or part of the input
of the next stage, if it is decided to proceed to the next stage.

II. The output or part of the output of one stage may be used as new input
(feedback) to reconsider or revise, where necessary, the result of a
proceeding stages and

III. Most importantly, the results of the implementation, operation and ex-post
evaluation stages of a project constitute valuable experience for the

Page 21
preparation of subsequent projects provided these inputs are systematically
documented and analyzed.

Page 22