A New Look at Rembrandt Iconography
A New Look at Rembrandt Iconography
A New Look at Rembrandt Iconography
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
IRSA s.c. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Artibus et
Historiae
1 Jan Biatostocki, "Ikonographische Forschungen zu Rem- 3 Jan Biatostocki, " Rembrandt's Iconography", in: Rembran
brandts Werk ", MOnchner Jahrbuch der bildenden Kunst, III F., VIII, after Three Hundred Years: A Symposium, Rembrandt and His
1957, p. 195-210, reprinted in my Stil und Ikonographie, Dresden, lowers, The Art Institute of Chicago, 1969, Chicago, 1973, p. 67
1966. - the same: " Der Sunder als tragischer Held bei Rembrandt ", in:
2 Stil und Ikonographie, p. 139f. Neue Beitrage zur Rembrandt-Forschung, Berlin (West), 1973, p.
137-150.
pressed that Rembrandt's works originated more from gener- On the other hand Timpel, in his studies proves tha
al ideas concerning human existence than from concrete Rembrandt's attitude towards subject matter was actually
themes 5. I have had to take Timpel's results into account, very different. Rembrandt knew iconographic tradition very
since I find them valid, and what I am presenting here is a well and he made wide use of it. His point of departure was
summary of his contribution, as well as some new consid- Lastman's Italianism with its concentration on history and
erations of my own concerning iconography in Rembrandt's originating in turn from Elsheimer. The basic source of Rem-
works 6. brandt's imagery was the rich repertory of pictorial narrative,
both mythological and historical, produced by German and
2 Netherlandish masters in the graphic arts in the XVIth and
the beginning of the XVIIth century, especially by Maerten
van Heemskerck.
Christian Timpel combines the education and profession
of a theologian with that of an art historian. Since 1967 he
has published several studies on Rembrandt iconography (( Instead of dogmatic and typological scenes more mov-
which have given important results shedding light on several ing ones appear. As a result various hitherto rarely used
controversial problems. His work has enabled us to consider- themes which in the XVIth century had been represente
only as elements in series, in simultaneous representa-
ably diminish and limit the ambiguities of meaning in Rem- tions, or as book illustrations were now shown on their
brandt's art. Formerly many Rembrandt scholars thought of own. Moreover, scenes which had beep shown before
Rembrandt as a great individualistic genius, and were con- only in graphic works were now also used in the loftier
vinced that the connections between his art and icono- technique of painting )) 8.
graphic tradition were rather slim and that his iconography was
to a great extent more directly influenced by the Bible. TGm- Tumpel has shown that almost all the previously rarely
pel accounts for the origins of this opinion by the influenceused biblical scenes, which Rembrandt introduced into paint-
of Classical criticism which considered an artist who disre- ing for the first time had already appeared earlier in prints,
garded accepted rules as a wild genius, unbound by cultural for example Samson Threatening this Father-in-law, Samson's
tradition. For these critics Rembrandt seemed to have Wedding, Judas Returning the 30 Pieces of Silver. Tumpel
concentrated mainly on purely artistic problems. also indicates a similar procedural method in the art of some
Dutch art historical studies, spurred by patriotic offeeling,
Rembrandt's contemporaries, broadly speaking, like the
have stressed Rembrandt's considerable education and his so-called Pre-Rembrandtists (Lastman, Pynas, Moeyaert), Ru-
exhaustive knowledge of the art of the past, but at the bens, Guercino, and Fetti. Therefore in Tumpels's method of
same
4 Kurt Bauch, Der frihe Rembrandt und seine Zeit, Berlin (West),Ikonographie der Historien Rembrandts ", in: Nederlands Kunsthistor-
1960, the same: " Ikonographischer Stil. Zur Frage der Inhalte in isch Jaarboek, XX, 1969, p. 107-198; the same: Rembrandt legt die
Rembrandts Kunst ", in the same: Studien zur Kunstgeschichte, Berlin Bibel aus..., Kupferstichkabinett der Staatlichen Museen, Preussischer
(West), 1967, p. 123-151; Jan Emmens, Rembrandt en de regels van Kulturbesitz, Berlin (West) 1970; the same: Rembrandt in Selbstzeug-
de kunst, Utrecht, 1968; Julius Held, Rembrandt's Aristotle and the nissen und Bilddokumenten, Reinbeck b. Hamburg, 1977; the same:
other Rembrandt Studies, Princeton, 1969; H. van de Waal, Steps to- Discourse held at the celebration on the occasion of the presentation
wards Rembrandt. Collected Articles 1937-1972, Amsterdam-London of de-Jong-van-Beek-en-Donk-Prize, in: Koninkhijke Nederlandse
1974. For more bibliography see the revised version of my article inAkademie van Wetenschappen [Amsterdam], Bijsondere Bijeenkomst
Stil und Ikonographie. Studien zur Kunstwissenschaft, new ed., K6ln,der Afdeling Letterkunde, 13.3.1972, p. 7-20.
1981, pp. 173-213.
5 Christian Tumpel, Studien zur Ikonographie der Historien Rem- 6 The present remarks repeat the main ideas of the new version
brandts: Deutung der bisher nicht oder falsch gedeuteten Historien, of my study, while developing still further a few questions from the
Hamburg 1968 (Diss.); the same: " Ikonographische Beitrige zu Rem-1981 revised version.
brandt ", I and II, in: Jahrbuch der Hamburger Kunstsammlungen, XIII 7 Tumpel, op. cit., 1972, p. 9.
1968, p. 96-126 and XVI, 1971, p. 20-38; the same: " Studien zur 8 Timpel, op. cit., 1972, p. 12.
10
~: *L~ r
,? *
1?~4?r~. ~*
?~??
":':~'"~~F~ '' I e
?L;?"L
??-
-?-~CCLL ?-I
'?-?L-. ~ .*.
?- s??-~;4~
~C~ ?-~
" " ':'~" --~ ?
--
-z
=-.c?: --
r
i
Cr Ucr
:"; '*
?b, ~tP ~"~~ ~~:.
r* ???
66
* i
"**y,
i?:
:?
r: t i~j
~ .. ? ~t. i .Ili~T;?w ~
1*
r rf_ I I f f
- r
~I- - I
'"
~tb~ r 1
ii:Y ?r ~?* + ..
i?~r ~Ci 1 c r
?? r ??Cc i i ,?
E~t - -Y .I~i~ r r r
~B r C?
ii
r: :?r?
I, ~rS? r : ~
?*
tt~ r. C r
r ~*
i 1,
r! '' I,
4 B rj: ? .rr
i,
:i;r It I i? ii' 1
~ , 1
??I,
r t.
:? '
1' r r
I "u ,
?r*
+I i.
(,
r?" ' I?? -e
:?1P J' ..,.~
--..-??, kLLJcl7JuEls ~ r lirr J
I !I: _. ,
i
?t"J~ii*-? !G ;~iaY
.. 1?
,v Er
~ '*
.r?
:~F~
~??~C1~?*
11
from the literal sense of the text, just as the pictorial tradition
did, and there are late works in which Rembrandt, following
in part some out-of-the-way tradition, corrects his earlier
.u"-
reading >; ...( In his earlier works he did tend to stick more
closely to the text than to the tradition and in the late works
~4-
it is the other way round; )) 13. Finally Tumpel described vari-
ous tendencies which can be discerned in Rembrandt's hand-
ling of the themes he represented. There is a great variety
of them; at times the historical context is very elaborate, at
others the main characters in the dramatis personae are
taken completely out of context. But generally <<through the
singling out of specific groups or individuals he intensified
the psychological content. He used chiaroscuro in much the
same way: he continually isolates the essential from the non-
essential form and thus he gives his own interpretation of
2) Rembrandt, ((The Prophetess Hannah with a Servant the story )) 14
Boy ), National Gallery of Scotland, Edinburgh. As a result of these considerations Tumpel managed to
solve several problems connected with identifying the sub-
jects of the paintings: for instance The Sunamit Woman
the left is represented at Christ's feet while in the GospelLeaving the Prophet Elisa instead of the Sending away of Ha-
Christ had met him much later and somewhere else 10. With gar 1640, Victoria and Albert Museum, London; David Taking
Leave of Jonathan instead of The Reconciliation of David and
this extremely flexible relationship to iconographic tradition
Rembrandt, even when borrowing from it, always maintained Absalom in Leningrad; Isaac and Rebecca instead of The Jew-
great independence. He transformed particular scenes either ish Bride in the Rijkmuseum, Sarah Awaiting Tobit instead of
making use of Biblical sources, or applying a particular selec-
Hendrickje in Bed; in Edinburgh; Moses smashing the Tablets
tion procedure (Herausl6sung), first noted and describedwith
by the 10 Commandments instead of Moses Showing the
Tablets
Tumpel 11. He selected minor elements from important his- of the 10 Commandments to the Jewish People, in
torical scenes and turned them into themes for composition Berlin; The Prophetess Hannah with a Servant Boy instead of
on their own. Timothy with his Grandmother in Edinburgh [Fig. 2]. Many of
Rembrandt's attitude towards literary tradition varied and
these have been quite important contributions 15. But they
it is difficult to express it univocally. According to Tumpel
are even more significant because of the clear-headed and
12
VQhLI~ r'
~i*
?r ? *t
:t;
?"I"-~.tl, .-llt
f*
"Yi!
Ic -' ~
?j
-:?ii?t v'i ?
:i
:$?i I ~t~? -- ~5~?~~
?1~~
r~r ?:;
*f~E~ ~p~. ~j~a~F~ ~-'~
1Fi~ X "rwi~
- ~tF?bS?' ~ ~3'-?-J? ""*
3) Rembrandt, (( Isaac and Rebecca )) (so-called ((Jewish Bride ))), Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam.
efficient methods the German scholar uses. It would be quitedow the historical themes he represented with universal hu-
impossible today for me to say again in the same way what Iman significance.
wrote in 1957, namely that << Rembrandt seems to have put What I should like however to reiterate is that although
aside the historical element to stress the universally human we now know that what we thought was the Jewish Bride is
content and his late pictures have become just symbols elud- really Isaac and Rebecca [Fig. 3], what gives this work its
ing any precise identification and interpretation )) 16. Practi- lasting importance and makes it a source of moving experi-
cally all the historical paintings by Rembrandt have now been ence to any sensitive viewer is not the vivid representation
traced to some religious or other themes and one has to ad- of the Biblical scene, but the fact that an emotional relation-
mit with Tumpel, that those interpreting them before him had ship between the artist and the viewer is established in a
stressed the unimportance of the subject matter and the im- picture endowed with extraordinary simplicity, subtlety, and
portance of the general human content precisely in those at the same time intensity and authenticity of expression.
cases where they were unable to identify the theme. Which In my study in 1957 I suggested that Rembrandt usually
does not of course prevent us from saying that the intensity began with some general idea - with what I called a broad
of Rembrandt's mise-en-scene and the depth of his art en- encompassing theme, like Reconciliation, Grace, Charity,
Friendship, Love and that it was only in the course of the
creative process that the subject cristallized into shape as a
16 As it was formulated by Tumpel, op. cit., 1969, p. 195. concrete historical theme. Tumpel however showed that
13
17 That the two opposing views of the way Rembrandt formed1973, p. 175.
his images (beginning with general ideas which I called encompass- 18 Timpel, op. cit., 1972, p. 19.
ing themes or beginning with historical subject matter as proposed 19 See " Encompassing Themes and Archetypal Images " in: Stu-
by Bauch and Timpel) may be reconciled was said by H. van de Waaldi in onore di Giusta Nicco Fasola (Arte Lombarda, X, 1965, vol. fuori
op. cit. (note 4), p. 212. Tumpel considers the problem in his contri-abbonamento), pp. 275-284.
bution to Neue Beitrage zur Rembrandt-Forschung, Berlin (West) 20 Footnote 4.
14
iC~'i"; ~~
:.~ ly:l~?.~l::tj
~i~;ii?S.?t?? ?:;-i;. ~-???? I~~
":?r.
"'' ~~"?"
c. .....i.
~r~7L~~C-T~?Cg
-r
4C'? ..I~
.1. .~r
E?, ~~
': " C..
4) Rembrandt, (( Landscape with the Story of the Good Samaritan )), coll. Czartoryski, Muzeum Narodowe, Krak6w
(National Museum, Cracow. Photo: Janusz Podlecki).
reality which repeats, which recurs while, as opposed to it, Perhaps so, if so conceived as to bring a universal moral
history includes any single non-recurring happening. Genre message to the observer.
then would be what has general, recurring features whereas Seen in this particular perspective, - as a universal alle-
history is individual, non-recurring, unique. This recalls the gory of human life - the category of genre becomes broader
well known definition of Aristotle where he opposed history and enables us to answer affirmatively the question whether
to poetry in the same way, considering poetry more philoso- Rembrandt ever painted genre. His pictures show old women
phical, because it speaks about universal, not individual reading, girls at their household chores, children with hunting
things and happenings 21. Is not then genre, a repeatable por- trophies [Fig. 5]. There is no reason to look upon such pic-
tion of reality, more philosophical than historical painting? tures as portraits of real individuals - ladies, girls or children.
Much more probably they resulted from observation of every-
day life. Rembrandt probably observed the day to day life in
21 Artistotle, Poetics, 1451 b, 3-8. his own household and each of these individuals might be
15
9"
'' The two nude boys posing in the foreground are of course
'r well suited to represent artistic practice. In this way genre
turns out to be a message on art theory. Another case is the
: 41
Self-Portrait of Rembrandt in the National Gallery with the
~-~ ~Z
?i
large circles on the wall in the background. To draw a per-
fect circle has been since time immemorial considered to be
a proof of mastery in drawing and it seems that, as Broos
?;
;r;;t
this time in portrait painting 24.
And it is precisely in this area that some very difficult
.2?-
problems I
have come up, which Bauch has studied, of distin-
*c~~~.~t? ?s?f
:.? ?? "' -
??
guishing portraits of contemporaries in historical garb which
i.
?-
he calls ( one figure history )) (einfigurige Historie) from what
are meant to be representations of historical figures. In his
9?:
"
;?
i?
some other historical figure. His family, his son and father
also appear as historical characters. The whole numerous
group of the so-called oriental princes or dignitaries, of the
?*~:.
_ : ~9~ i 9Y 't4? rabbis and philosophers, hovers in no-man's land 25. That
may only go to show how inadequate our definitions of
5) Rembrandt, ((A Child iconographic
with genresthe
are. Hunting Trop
Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam. Recent developments in studies in the field of emblema-
tics, which were especially splendid in Holland, have unco-
vered more and more hitherto unknown meanings in the pic-
identifiable theoretically 22. But these pictures are neither por- tures and as a result many pictures have had to be moved
traits nor histories. They are most probably just glimpses of from classification in the non-historical category of genre to
life seen as allegories; old women reading prayer books as the one of allegory 26
personifications of piety, girls at their household chores as Our concept of a genre painting as something small and
allegories of industry or diligence, children at play, dead birds intimate is of course in contrast with monumental painting;
or animals as allegories of transience, from life to death, be- however it is sometimes difficult for us to find any place else
ginning to end. to put a picture than in these categories. For instance the 1 8th
A print from about 1 646 [Fig. 6] always considered to be century owner of the Polish Rider called it (( Cosaque A che-
a study or genre piece (as a matter of fact in most of the re- val >. We can hardly accept this now. Since the thorough re-
productions this etching is called Studies of Nudes) has been search done by Julius Held we see this picture - this time in
shown by the late Jan Emmens, poet and art historian, to agreement with its monumental shape - as being rich in
22 Tumpel, op. cit., 1969, pp. 178-180. Iandischen Malerei des 17. Jhdts, Herzog-Anton-Ulrich-M
23 Emmens, op. cit. (note 4), pr. 154-159. Braunschweig, 1978; Ars Emblematica, Muzeum Narodowe w
24 B.P.J. Broos, "The O of Rembrandt ", Simiolus, IV, 1970, p.
szawie, 1981; E. de Jongh, Zinne- en minnebeelden in de sc
150-184. kunst van de zeventiende eeuw, no place, 1967. Against this
25 See my lecture " Books of Wisdom and Books of Vanity ", in:
dency to overstress the emblematic meaning see Svetlana Al
In Memoriam J. G. van Gelder 1903-1980, Utrecht, 1982, pp.
The49-53,
Art of Describing. Dutch Art in the Seventeenth Century, C
59. London, 1983 (Especially the Appendix: "On the Emblematic In-
26 Exhibitions: Tot Lering en Vermaak, Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam,
terpretation of Dutch Art ", pp. 229-233).
1976; Die Sprache der Bilder. Realitat und Bedeutung in der nieder-
16
...
-....
5... .
-.... ,....
" ,.~*-
, -...- . '
-.---.
-. . - :.
,,~ ~ ! _ _.."
! , 4
! "'..
,-- ...-.,.. ..
? -:,.. ,,
symbolic and allegorical meanings. Campbell proposes that Scholar or Rabbi of 1634 [Fig. 7]. If such works are not por-
we see it as a subject from religious history - the story of traits, where do they belong? So similar as they are to the
the prodigal son - while more recent studies have gone back paintings of the scholar in his study, are they allegories of
to the original idea of its being a portrait 27 (Broos, Chro?- wisdom, scholarship, or erudition in human or divine mat-
cicki). ters? The well known correspondance of the Italian collector
Another picture whose monumental format and character Ruffo in connection with the Aristotle painting, and what
defy attempts to classify it as a genre piece is the Prague was supposed to be its companion picture by Guercino
27 The recent contribution by Juliusz Chro'cicki (" Rembrandt's brandt and Persia, New York, 1983, pp. 59-91 and 133-144 (the Po-
lish Rider interpreted as " David before his encounter with the Philis-
Polish Rider. Allegory or Portrait? ", in Ars Auro Prior. Studia Joanni
Biatostocki Sexagenario Dicata, Warsaw, 1981, pp. 441-448) in- tines ").
cludes previous bibliography. See now also Leonard J. Slatkes, Rem-
18
19