Chicana Activism
Chicana Activism
Chicana Activism
Chicana Activism
Name
Institution
Course
Date
2
Chicana Activism
Dolores Huerta is an iconic leader who rose to prominence as the co-founder and
President of the United Farm Workers (UFW). She was a traditional leader who focused on
working with organizations to negotiate better wages and working conditions for farmworkers.
While considering the past, the United States, Grassroots activism and coordinated
demonstrations led to movements that influenced broader fights for social and political justice
(Bernal, 1998). When Dolores Huerta first became involved in advocating for farmworkers'
rights, she faced an uphill battle in gaining acceptance as a leader because she was a woman, and
the farm working community was primarily comprised of men. Additionally, her tactics—which
included non-violent civil disobedience, unionization, and other activism—were seen as radical
at the time and not accepted by many. She faced much opposition and criticism, and her efforts
In addition, Dolores Huerta took a different approach than the traditional male leaders of
the period, another reason why farmworkers did not embrace her as a leader. She was a woman
and a Latina, two categories not especially accepted in the labor movement during that period.
She was also a union organizer. For instance, Chávez is comparable to the hundreds of other
Mexicanas and Chicanas who participated in demonstrations and front lines (Rose, 1990). The
different paths to and uses of power by Huerta and Chávez, two prominent Chicanas and
Mexicanas in the labor movement are exemplified by their perspectives on and involvement in
politics, union activity, public visibility, and the home sphere, respectively.
leading the movement for farmworker rights (Rose, 1990). In the annals of United States history,
the walkouts, also known as blowouts, were the first significant public demonstration against
3
racism by Mexican Americans. These women utilized grassroots tactics such as boycotts,
pickets, and civil disobedience to raise awareness and pressure the government and employers to
The significant differences between how women lead and how men lead are often found
compassionate approach, focusing on communication and consensus (Ziegler, 2023). Women are
typically socialized to prioritize relationships, while men are often socialized to prioritize
individual achievement and competition. Women are also more likely to take the time to listen to
those they are leading and to build relationships (Ziegler, 2023). Women are more likely to
prioritize communication and emotional intelligence, while men are likelier to emphasize logic
and rationality. Ultimately, while there are significant differences between how women and men
lead, the key is understanding the nuances of each leadership style and how to utilize both to
approach that combines education, advocacy, and policy reform. I would take an approach that
emphasizes collaboration, communication, and compromise. Those who can collaborate and find
out something worth agreeing on drive the best developments. I am primarily concerned with
educating people about the facts and effects of environmental change, advocating for increased
public attention to ecological challenges, and reforming legislative and corporate policies to
promote practicable practices. By taking this approach, we can create a more sustainable future
for our planet. Finally, I believe in the importance of compromise and negotiation, as this can
help make a more unified front and a platform for positive change.
4
References
Bernal, D. D. (1998). Grassroots leadership reconceptualized: Chicana oral histories and the
113-142.
Rose, M. (1990). Traditional and nontraditional patterns of female activism in the United Farm
https://bestdiplomats.org/men-vs-women-leadership-qualities/