2021 ACEX30 Tomas Mertala - Jenny Strålman

11
Construction Digital Twin

From Early Design to Project Delivery
Master’s thesis in Design and Construction Project Management
TOMAS MERTALA-LINDSAY
JENNY STRÅLMAN
DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECHTURE AND CIVIL ENGINEERING
DIVISION OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
Gothenburg, Sweden 2021
www.chalmers.se
MASTER’S THESIS ACEX30

Master’s Thesis in Design and Construction Project Management
JENNY STRÅLMAN
Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering

Division of Construction Management
Master’s Thesis in Design and Construction Project Management

JENNY STRÅLMAN
© TOMAS MERTALA-LINDSAY & JENNY STRÅLMAN, 2021
Examensarbete ACEX30
Institutionen för Arkitektur och Samhällsbyggnadsteknik
Chalmers Tekniska Högskola, 2021

Chalmers University of Technology
SE-412 96 Gothenburg
Sweden
Telephone: + 46 (0)31-772 1000
I
Master’s thesis in Design and Construction Project Management
JENNY STRÅLMAN
Chalmers University of Technology
ABSTRACT
The construction industry is currently facing the change of digitalization. The
fragmented nature of construction projects is challenging the collaboration and
innovation needed for the industry and society to benefit from the digitalization. The
purpose of this research is to investigate the digital twin technology as a tool to integrate
the different phases and actors of the construction industry, from early design to the
project delivery. The current literature describes the digital twin as a concept that can
lead towards a smarter construction, a smarter built environment and the dream of a
smart planet. The digital twin has already increased the quality among products in the
manufacturing industry and interconnected the factory and production with the external
world. A mixed method approach was conducted to investigate digital twin initiatives
broadly in the built environment and more in dept in the construction industry. The
result showed that digital twin technology is on the agenda on a global scale, with
innovation efforts being shared and coordinated. On a more local scale, cities and real
estate owners talk about digital twins while design and construction are starting to
digitalize their practices and collaboration between actors. The digitalization and
sustainability are expected to revolutionize the industry and the digital twin has to be
initiated at the same time as the idea of a new construction project is born. When the
digital twin becomes nurtured of information in the early design as well as the design
and construction phase the digital twin can survive the project delivery and, in that way,
increase the quality of assets being delivered and increase the sustainability condition
for society and the built environment.
Key words: Built environment, construction industry, digital twin, project delivery
I
II
Contents
ABSTRACT I
CONTENTS III
LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES V
PREFACE VI
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS VII
1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Background 1
1.2 Purpose and aim 2
1.3 Research questions 2
1.4 Scope and delimitations 2
2 THEORY 3
2.1 Role of technology 3
2.1.1 Technology progress 3
2.1.2 Innovation framework 4
2.2 Digital twin 5
2.2.1 Conceptual origin 5
2.2.2 Theoretical development 6
2.2.3 Definitions 7
2.2.4 Connected concept 8
2.2.5 Smart manufacturing 8
2.2.6 Industry 4.0 9
2.2.7 Application fields 10
2.3 Construction 11
2.3.1 Building information modelling 12
2.3.2 Digital tools 13
2.3.3 Smart construction site 14
2.3.4 Project delivery 15
2.4 Built environment 16
2.4.1 Buildings 16
2.4.2 Cities 17
3 METHOD 18
3.1 Research strategy 18
3.2 Literature review 18
3.3 Data collection 19
3.3.1 Documents 19
3.3.2 Observations 19
3.3.3 Interviews 19
CHALMERS Architecture and Civil Engineering, Master’s Thesis ACEX30 III

3.4 Data analysis 20
3.4.1 Quantitative data 20
3.4.2 Qualitative data 20
3.5 Report structure 20
3.6 Research ethics 20
4 RESULT AND FINDINGS 21

4.1 Digital twin initiative 21
4.1.1 State of the art review 22
4.1.2 Built environment 23
4.2 Asset and facility management 24
4.2.1 Sustainability 24
4.2.2 Lifecycle management 25
4.2.3 Digital maturity 25
4.2.4 Construction 26
4.2.6 Standard and regulation 27
4.3 Design and construction 27
4.3.1 Early design 27
4.3.2 Design and procurement 28
4.3.3 Digital maturity 29
4.3.4 Construction 29
4.3.6 Standards and regulations 31
5 ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION 32

5.1 Digital twin definition 32
5.2 The digital twin paradigm 33
5.3 Digital twin initiatives 34
5.4 Lifecycle perspective 35
5.5 Project delivery 36
5.6 Digital twin framework 37
5.6.1 A digital twin ecosystem 37
5.6.2 From early design to project delivery 38
5.7 Methodology 39
5.8 Sustainability and ethical aspect 39
5.9 Further research 39
6 CONCLUSION 40
7 REFERENCES 41
IV CHALMERS, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Master’s Thesis ACEX30

List of Tables and Figures
Figure 1 Evolution of digital twin as described in this section ......................................5
Figure 2 Mirror space model..........................................................................................6
Figure 3 PLM model ......................................................................................................6
Figure 4 Definition of a digital twin...............................................................................7
Figure 5 Level of integration..........................................................................................8
Figure 6 Layers of digital twins within the factory ........................................................9
Figure 7 Industry revolutions .......................................................................................10
Figure 8 Level of maturity ...........................................................................................10
Figure 9 Building digital twin ......................................................................................17
Figure 10 City digital twin ...........................................................................................17
Figure 11 Ecosystem of digital twins in the built environment ...................................37
Figure 12 Digital twin interoperability trough design & construction PM ..................38
Table 1 Selected articles in initial literature search......................................................18

Table 2 Interview participants......................................................................................19
Table 3 Digital twin initiatives in the built environment and construction industry....21
CHALMERS Architecture and Civil Engineering, Master’s Thesis ACEX30 V

Preface
In this study, we have investigated the digital twin concept with a focus on the built
environment. The work has been carried out between January and June 2021 and covers
30 ECTS. This thesis has been conducted within the Department of Architecture and
Civil Engineering, Division of Construction Management at Chalmers University of
Technology.
The subject is still in its infancy and it has been inspiring to partially base this paper on
contemporary research, with several new papers discussing the digital twin concept
emerging every day. It feels like a hot topic for the future of the construction industry,
and hopefully we can use the insights we gained during this paper and further develop
them withing the business. This thesis is written for all practitioners in the industry that
would like to know more about this, so far, mysterious topic. With any luck, this thesis
can prove to be a base for future master thesis students interested in the digital twin
concept.
Finally, we would like to thank our families for supporting us when writing this thesis.
We would also acknowledge the positive reaction from actors within the industry when
contacted by us students, generously giving time for interviews and for sharing
knowledge.
Gothenburg June 2021

Tomas Mertala-Lindsay & Jenny Strålman
VI CHALMERS, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Master’s Thesis ACEX30

List of Abbreviations
AEC Architecture, Engineering, Construction
AI Artificial Intelligence
AR Augmented Reality
BIM Building Information Modelling
CIM City Information Modelling
CPS Cyber-Physical System
DL Deep Learning
DM Data mining
DT Digital Twin
FM Facility Management
GIS geographical Information System
LOD Level of Detail
ML Machine Learning
IDD Integrated digital delivery
IFC Industry Foundation Classes
IoT Internet of Things
IPD Integrated Project Delivery
IPR Intellectual Property Rights
I4.0 Industry 4.0
PBOD Performance Based Optimal Design
PLM Product Lifecycle Management
PM Project Management
QR Quick Response
RFID Radio Frequency Identification
SIM System Information Modeling
UAV Unmanned Air Vehicles
VR Virtual Reality
CHALMERS Architecture and Civil Engineering, Master’s Thesis ACEX30 VII

VIII CHALMERS, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Master’s Thesis ACEX30
1 Introduction
1.1 Background
The construction industry face multiple challenges, such as the need for better
sustainability and for higher efficiency and productivity. Information technology and
digitalization has for the last decades been the main developing factor for most
industries. It is a part of the latest industrial revolution, building on technological
advancements in scope as large as the mechanisation, electrification, and automation
revolutionary steps before it (Xu, Xu, & Li, 2018). The construction industry is
characterised by fragmented and multidisciplinary project-based production and has
been slow in adopting innovations within process and technology. The industry as a
whole has not yet embraced new digital technologies that need up-front investment,
even if the long-term benefits are significant (McKinsey, 2017).
Integration of construction processes, disciplines, actors, and stakeholders across

project phases could be enhanced through digitalization and information technologies.
In order for technology to generate value and benefits, it needs to be met with changes
in practices, processes, expectations, relationships and/or business strategies (Love and
Matthews, 2019). Technology plays a role in both organizational interaction as well as
the societal interaction with its built and natural environment (Gunderson, 2016), and
should be studied in a context (Orlikowski and Scott, 2008). For the building industry
BIM has been used as a cornerstone in the quest of digitalisation. Resent research has
focused on different enhancements of the technology. The 3D model generated now
isn’t just a model but contains detailed information on a component level, with digital
tools added for collaboration between stakeholders and data mining (Boje et al, 2021).
Digital twin is a technology already largely adopted in the manufacturing industry for
mathematical modelling, simulation, and optimization and is seen as a part of Industry
4.0 (Lim et al, 2021). In smart manufacturing it works as a facilitator for sharing
information between internal and external stakeholders (Negri et al 2017), as well as
connecting components, machines and systems inside the factory (Tchana et al, 2019).
The concept has gained popularity in urban planning across the globe. Cities as well as
national digital twins are expected to revolutionize the built environment, analyse real-
time data, and try out complex systems before being built (Ketzler, 2020).
CHALMERS Architecture and Civil Engineering, Master’s Thesis ACEX30 1

1.2 Purpose and aim
Based on the need of change and digitalization as well as the inherent challenges of the
construction industry, the purpose of this report is to investigate the digital twin as a
responsible and effective solution of a more productive, effective, and sustainable
construction production as well as constructing a more sustainable build environment.
There is a current gap in the research regarding digital twins for the entire construction
production process. This report aims to bridge this gap between research of digital twins
for urban planning, construction sites, site logistics, and digital twins for the built
environment, intelligent buildings and smart cities. The report also bridges this gap by
comparing with the manufacturing industry, where digital twin for design and operation
is prominent but also production and smart factories are at the fore front. The purpose
of this report is hence formulized as following:
- To describe the current state of digital twins in the built environment and
explore the possibility of a digital twin at project delivery.
1.3 Research questions

In order to reach the purpose of this report, a set of research questions (RQs) are
identified. RQ1-RQ3 are many intended to describe the current state of digital twins,
whereas RQ4 and RQ5 are more related to exploring the possibility of a digital twin at
project delivery. The research questions are formulated as following:
RQ1 Clarify terminology, technology, concept, origin

RQ2 Identify commonalities and differences between Digital twin and BIM
RQ3 Identify contemporary digital twin initiative
RQ4 Explore the design, production, and operation perspectives
RQ5 Explore challenges and advantages of a digital twin
surviving through the project delivery.
1.4 Scope and delimitations

The limitation of this research is two folded: 1) The construction industry can further
be developed into three categories of sectors, namely buildings, infrastructure, and
industry facilities. This report is focusing on buildings as a representation of the built
environment and construction production. The reason for this is that buildings are easy
to visualize as well as a traditional rational understanding of the built environment and
a construction process product. Moreover, the building segment of the construction is
somewhat behind infrastructure in design simulations (source) and considering
maintenance and operation in the design and construction phase of the project process
(source). Moreover, the construction production and operation of industry facilities are
partly included in this report due to the parallels and conclusions drawn upon from the
digital twin examples in the manufacturing industry. 2) The focus of this report is also
focusing on the context of the Swedish construction industry and a limited external
analysis. This limitation is due to the feasibility of the study as well as the convenience
selection of the study. The external outlook outside the Swedish context is based on
suitability for the study and possible conjunction and closeness to the Swedish
construction industry.
2 CHALMERS, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Master’s Thesis ACEX30

2 Theory
2.1 Role of technology

In order to effectively study management of organizations, the role of technology needs
to be taken into consideration (Orlikowski & Scott, 2008) and be critically reflected
upon (Gunderson, 2016). This role of technology might vary with different theories on
technology. Orlikowski & Scott (2008) suggest that technology is constructively
entangled to organizational work in situational practices and are therefore difficult to
conceptualize separately from its context, meaning and outcome. In order to not
attribute properties or intentionality to technical artifacts, concepts should be malleable
and updated frequently with technological progress and application field. How
technology is entangled with organizational work is not yet theorized, hence the
theoretical lens needs to develop over time. An array of perspectives and theories on
technology might be needed to understand the integral, multiple, emerging role of
technology. Similarly, Gunderson (2016) suggests that technology tends to become
more invisible the older it gets or the more integral it is. Thus, theories of technology
impact and interaction offers insights to think about and frameworks to partly think
within, although technology is not explicitly considered entangled to organizational
work. For this thesis, technology is inherently considered to be more than technological
artifacts. It matters how it’s been utilized and for what reasons. Moreover, the digital
twin can be understood as influence, impact and interact with organizational work, as
well as only exist in relation to current or future construction practices and processes.
2.1.1 Technology progress

Technology impact and interaction often motivates for the focus on technology in
organizational studies (Orlikowski & Scott, 2008). Technology plays a role in both
organizational interaction as well as the societal interaction with its built and natural
environment (Gunderson, 2016). Although the digital twin is entangled to situational
practices, it might not yet be an integral part of organizational work within the
construction industry. According to (Peine, 2008) can a technological paradigm
describe aspects of technological change under particular conditions, but not explain
the innovation process as a whole. Derived from scientific paradigms as expected
solutions of a shared accepted problem, Peine (2008) defines a technological paradigm
as a dominant design, shared commitment and mindset. If the dominant design is well
developed within an industry, the technological paradigm can primarily describe the
cumulative technological development. However, the shared commitment and mindset
is more difficult to coordinate. Similarly, to Peine (2008), Cantwell & Hayashi (2019)
describes the technological paradigm as commonalties in a cluster of innovations and
innovation efforts, over time and during an era of shared scientific principles and
similar organisational methods. The coevolution and interaction of key elements and
innovation divers of knowledge, institutions and production forces such as technology,
better describes the paradigm shifts and social evolution and innovation process as a
whole. These techno-socio-economical paradigms can be applied within industries,
technical fields or in society as a whole (Cantwell & Hayashi, 2016).

A technical paradigm can first pose a challenge for innovations. Once this challenge is
overcome the technological paradigm offers great potential (Peine, 2008). Technology
progress and social evolution is never linear, it might go from one distinct paradigm to
another, in order to find a third alternative in between (Cantwell & Hayashi, 2016).
Pollack (2007) suggests a paradigm extension, claiming that different situations require
different management paradigms. The added paradigm would reinterpret the existing
tools and techniques, and factor people participation, engagement, process facilitating
and continuous learning.
2.1.2 Innovation framework

The social (Gunderson, 2016) and organization (Orlikowski & Scott, 2008) aspect of
technology is described by Woodhouse (2013) as a spectrum of artifacts, techniques,
organization and systems. Technology is also inseparably entangled to social, political,
economic and psychological phenomena. Technological innovations might not
automatically generate good things and social improvements. Challenges such as
unintended consequences, unfairness, to slow or to rapid innovation might need
thoughtful guidance in design, implementation and distribution (Woodhouse, 2013).
Business organization and innovation coordination might accompany the technological
paradigm in the innovation process (Peine, 2008). The key innovation drivers of
knowledge, institutions and production technology (Cantwell & Hayashi, 2019) is put
in a socioecological perspective by Carayannis et al (2019). The co-existence and
development of knowledge and innovation divers, such as creative milieus,
entrepreneurs, employees, knowledge clusters, innovation networks, academic firms
etc., interact at different local, organizational and global levels. The knowledge
exchange and collective interaction is put in a context of the civil society and
environment for illustrating both regional economic growth and its sociological
integration (Carayannis et al, 2019). The regional economic growth, success and
wellbeing, in the information era, is examined by Harmaakorpi et al (2003) in the light
of different theories on the same techno-socio-economic paradigm as Cantwell &
Hayashi (2016). The regional competitiveness is influenced by areas of information,
knowledge, learning, expertise, network, service, technological paradigm shift in
production, innovation, values, individualism, security for inhabitants and possibility
for choice and experience of customers. Indicators related to productivity is strongly
connected to the regional competitiveness, success and wellbeing (Harmaakorpi, 2003).
The shift or extension towards a digital twin paradigm might be motivated or put in
relation to both socio-ecological and economical sustainability. The innovation efforts
and knowledge drivers coevolve and coexist on different micro-macro levels, but the
innovation capacity and competitiveness might vary between regions. Moreover, the
technological paradigm can be a great analytic tool for aspects of innovations. These
theories on technology in organizations (Orlikowski & Scott, 2008), in social studies
(Gunderson, 2016), project management (Pollack, 2007), innovation process (Peine,
2008; Cantwell & Hayashi, 2019), innovation framework (Carayannis et al, 2019) and
regional competitive (Harmaakorpi, 2003) forms the foundation of the theoretical
framework for this thesis. The concepts and theories presented in academic literature
related to digital twins are discussed based on this theoretical foundation and results are
analysed within this framework. This chapter starts with presenting concepts, theories
and discussing academic literature of digital twin in general, followed by the context of
the construction industry, and lastly in relation to the built environment.

2.2 Digital twin
The digital twin is described as a technological paradigm for smart systems and
environments that might lead to the realization of a dreamt smart planet (Ray &
Evangeline, 2019). The digital twin paradigm is also expressed as factoring people and
practices for, not only smart construction, but more intelligent and automated
construction sites and a smart built environment (Boje et al, 2020). The digital twin is
basically a digital representation of a physical thing. The digital twin can be understood
as a paradigm, concept, model or thing (Sjarov et al, 2020). The paradigm, and concept,
refers to the general idea of the digital twin, whereas the digital twin model refers to
more textual or graphical elaborated concrete specifications. The digital twin as a thing
can be understood as the non-physical subset of the concept or model. Apart from being
referred to as a paradigm, the digital twin is also mentioned as a part of product lifecycle
management, PLM, paradigm (Grieves, 2005), physical-data-virtual paradigm (Sjarov
et al, 2020; Boje et al, 2020), and a smart manufacturing paradigm (Lim et al, 2020).
These other paradigms provide intel about the origin, evolution of digital twin as well
as connected concepts. This section of the theory will describe the journey of the digital
twin concept (as illustrated in fig. 1) to better understand possible application fields and
technology. The section starts with presenting the general idea if the digital twin and its
industrial introduction, in the context of PLM. The first explicit definition elaborated
in context of the aerospace and space application field, and finally the digital twin as a
thing in context of the industry 4.0, smart manufacturing and digitalization.
PLM Aerospace/Space Smart Manufacturing

Figure 1 Evolution of digital twin as described in this section
2.2.1 Conceptual origin

In order to understand the digital twin, many authors start by examining the origin and
evolution of the concept. The term digital twin was referred to by scientists in the 1990s
in context of engineering and medicine applications (Ketzler et al, 2020). The concept
was first introduced to the industry as a mirror space model in 2002 (Grieves, 2005),
and started to emerge in product design and manufacturing practices, early 2000
(Ketzler et al, 2020). Grieves (2005) presented the mirror space model (see fig. 2)
together with a PLM model (see fig. 3) to discuss and conceptualize the holistic and the
component perspective of product lifecycle management. The PLM model integrated
the information and processes from different lifecycle stages and centred that
information around the product. The idea of the digital twin was that this information
core could create a digital entity of its own, mirroring the product through its lifetime
(Grieves, 2005). This first mirror space model of the digital twin represents the smallest
common determinator among the many diverse definitions, application fields
throughout the digital twin evolution (Sjarov et al, 2020). Most publications, definitions
and models of the concept are from 2016 or later, indicating that the digital twin concept
is still evolving, and further theory building is to be expected (Sjarov et al, 2020).

Design Data Flow
Disposal
Product-centric
Information Real
Core Space Virtual
Space
Production
Operation
Information Flow
Figure 3 PLM model (Grieves, 2005) Figure 2 Mirror space model (Grieves, 2005)
2.2.2 Theoretical development

The academic literature on digital twins when trough a formation stage from its
industrial introduction in 2003 until 2011 (Tao et al, 2019). This formation stage was
characterised by few publications, immature technology foundation and a lack of long-
term vision. The first application field envisioning the prospects of the digital twin and
elaboration a more explicit definition was the aerospace industry. The first academic
article 2011, and the first definition by Glaessgen & Stragel (2012) where both in the
context of aerospace application field. After its first academic article the digital twin
research field entered an incubation stage, with an increase in research effort and
interest. This incubation stage is considered to have lasted until the first white paper on
digital twins 2014 (Tao et al 2019) in which the digital twin journey for conceptual idea
to numerous of application fields (Grieves, 2014). Similarly, Negri et al (2017) reviews
the digital twin literature from 2012 in context of smart manufacturing environments,
and states that all digital twin references from 2012-2013 are from the same conference
event. Indicating that few research communities where initially interested.
In 2015 and 2016 the number of publication and application fields increased and goes
beyond the aerospace application to industry engineering and manufacturing (Negri et
al, 2020). However, most publications where still conference papers. From 2016 the
research interest has grown exponentially (Tao et al, 2020, Ketzler et al, 2020; Sjarov
et al, 2020). The literature on digital twin were reviewed in the context of product life
cycle management and manufacturing, 2016 and in the context of maintenance
applications 2019. Reviews distinguishing application as identify dimensions of
applications has also been done recently (Sjarov et al, 2020). Lim et al (2021) reviews
the benefit of digital twin considering both an engineering product life cycle
management and business innovation perspective, with a technical aspect as
foundation. Identifying research areas are of greater importance due to the continuous
evolution and vast expansion in application potential. Future aspects of digital twin
development are, among other, the end-of-life stage of engineering PLM to create a
continuous product lifecycle within smart manufacturing, expand the digital twin other
industries, such as healthcare and construction, and technology aspects such as
simulation improvements, VR and Cloud/Edge computing integration (Lim et al, 2020).

2.2.3 Definitions
As mentioned above there is no coherent definition or understanding of the digital twin
concept. The conceptual definitions and models are held lightly, and the more explicit
definitions are more diversely elaborated in relation to the different contextualization
of the concepts, application fields and technology development (Sjarov et al, 2020).
The concept is, in its simplest form, defined slightly different. The digital twin is
commonly described as a digital representation, replica or mirror of a physical asset
(Ketzler et al, 2020). Moreover, the asset type may range from product, process, to
whole production systems (Sjarov, 2020). These definitions open up for interpretation
of both digital representation as well as physical objects. Moreover, Ketzler et al (2020)
describes the digital twin as a living virtual model, a connected digital representation
of a physical system, and (Sjarov et al, 2020) describes the digital twin concept, in the
smart manufacturing context, as a coupled virtual representation of a physical asset.
Which adds ‘virtual model’ and ‘virtual representation’ into the equation. Although
there is no common explicit definition of digital twins, the core stays the same (Sjarov
et al, 2020; Lim et al, 2021). This core is developing from the product monitor of the
mirror space model, towards establishing a bi-directional communication before
evolving to a simulation model and dynamic virtual entity (Lim et al, 2021). Thus, in
order to avoid research bias, Liam et al (2021) defines the digital twin as a ‘high-fidelity
virtual replica of the physical asset with real-time two-way communication for
simulation purposes and decision-aiding features for product service enhancement’ (see
figure 4). A definition based on the distinguishment of digital twins and cyber-physical
systems, by Tao et al (2019). The simplest definition is presented as a digital
representation of a physical object (Grief et al, 2020).
Digital Real-time 2-way communication

Simulation of various scenarios
Physical Decision-support functionalities
Object Digital Twin: Exact replica of a physical asset
Twin Available in CAD-model
High-fidelity
Figure 4 Definition of a digital twin (Lim et al, 2020)
Not providing an explicit definition can add blur to the emerging digital twin paradigm
(Sjarov et al, 2020). Some literature might implicitly, via functional aspects, define the
digital twin, or assume characteristics and functions and capabilities. Moreover, the
digital twin might even be used only as a catchphrase (Sjarov et al, 2020) and
understood as simply a buzzword (Ketzler et al, 2020). This might make it more
difficult to understand the contextualization of the digital twin and might aggravate
future forming of accurate definitions and theory building (Sjarov et al, 2020). The most
frequently used definition is adapted from the aerospace field (Ketzler et al, 2020) in
the end of the digital twin theoretical forming stage, influencing the incubation stage
and increase of research interest and application fields. Glaessgen & Stragel (2012)
defined the digital twin as ´an integrated multi-physics, multiscale, probabilistic
simulation of an as-built vehicle or system that uses the best available physical models,
sensor updates, fleet history, etc., to mirror the life of its corresponding flying twin’.
Glaessgen & Stragel (2012) suggested the digital twin paradigm as a long-term vision
to increase the safety and reliability for both aerospace and space vehicles.

2.2.4 Connected concept
Similar models already existed when the mirror space model got introduced. Since the
concept still are developing there is no coherent understanding or definition of the
digital twin (Sjarov et al, 2020; Lim et al, 2020). To understand the concept better,
Sjarov et al (2020) present related concepts that share the same underlying physical-
data-virtual paradigm. These concepts can support the digital twin but differs in how
data is transferred, store and manage data. A virtual twin only needs the data necessary
for operation, the digital shadow provides information for stakeholders, and the virtual
twin data space would synchronize and interdisciplinary compare the data from the
physical and virtual lifecycles. Moreover, a digital surrogate, digital triplet or a product
avatar could be used for simulation, what if prediction, and for virtual reality. Similarly.
the initial mirror space model had sub-virtual spaces (Grieves, 2005) for either
simulation or instance presentation. Kritzinger et al (2018) categorized the digital twin
literature according to level of integration between the physical object and the digital
representation (see fig. 4). Most existing literature is on digital models and shadows
(Kritzinger et al, 2018) with manual or semi-automated data flow.
Physical Physical Physical

Object Digital Object Digital Object Digital
Model Shadow Twin
Manual Data Flow

Automatic Data Flow
Figure 5 Level of integration (Kritzinger et al, 2018).
2.2.5 Smart manufacturing

The digital twin is a key concept of the 4th industrial revolution (Lim et al, 2021) and a
key enabler of digital transformation (Kritzinger et al, 2018). Industry 4.0 is
transforming digital factories into smart manufacturing and smart production. These
smart shopfloors would be connected to components, machines and systems inside the
factory (Tchana et al 2019). The shopfloor would also be connected with stakeholders,
costumers and other production sites outside the factory (Negri et al 2017). This
integration and interconnection can be enabled trough a digital twin. Cheng et al (2020)
present one digital twin framework, of smart manufacturing, in which the product
lifecycle is connected with the shopfloor as well as a collaboration network with
external companies of the value chain. Similarly, Zhuang et al (2021) integrates the
shopfloor logistics, equipment operation and product status in a digital twin framework
where the non-physical subset of the shop-floor digital twin is connected to the relevant
instance of the product digital twin. In addition to the factory, manufacturing assets and
the production network, the digital twin of smart manufacturing can also cover a people
aspect of the shopfloor (Lu et al, 2019). Worker’s wellbeing, working conditions,
training and human-machine collaboration is part of a future potential aspect within the
smart manufacturing vision. Furthermore, Hellmuth et al (2021) introduce a digital twin
of the factory building to the smart factory. In order to shorten decision making
processes on the construction site, while regularly reconstruct the factory, Hellmuth et
al (2020) presents a communication model between different digital twin layers of the
factory (see figure 6). Each layer of digital twins communicates with the adjacent ones.

Factory
Building
Production
Process
Human-Machine
Interaction
Shopfloor
Machines
Digital Twin:
Product
Lifecycle
Figure 6 Layers of digital twins within the factory (Hellmuth et al, 2020).
2.2.6 Industry 4.0

Looking closer the concept of industry 4.0 and digital transformation, both concepts are
more than just implementing and merge new technology developments. Industry 4.0 is
characterized by end-to-end integration, with the product lifecycle, as well as horizontal
and vertical integration, within and between enterprises in a digital industrial ecosystem
(Xu et al, 2018). The enabling technologies integrate the physical world with the virtual
space and concepts such as the smart factory has emerged to deal with these cyber-
physical environments. Moreover, features within process and workflow management
is also considered a part of the implementation. Some technology advancements need
methods and process developments in order to realize the current anticipated capacity
of industry 4.0. In addition, new technology development is needed to exploit its full
potential. One such powerful development, within the industry 4.0 environment, would
be to integrate workflow and process models from various intraorganizational contexts
(Xu et al, 2018). Barata & Rupino (2018) describes industry 4.0 as a reconfiguration of
organizational practices and networks, based on the work of Orlikowski & Scott (2008).
These reconfigurations and its relations with social and environmental context depend
on the depth and pace of the digital transformation. Moreover, Barata & Rupino (2018)
stretches the difference of a digital twin and a mirror, emphasizing that the digital twin
should embrace the human and organization integration with technology rather than
simply having the physical and digital entity mirroring each other. The digital twin is
also mentioned in the context of the 5th Industrial revolution by Nahavandi (2019). The
contextual difference lies within the social, human and cognitive emphasis, having
technology collaborating with and learning from the workers.
When it comes to digital transformation, it is commonly understood as digitization

triggers digitalization which in its turn enables digital transformation. However, the
terms are used synonymously and there is no concept describing the holistic
transformation in organizations or society (Bockshecker et al, 2018). From a
sociotechnical perspective, the digital transformation and digitalization can be
understood as sociotechnical processes, whereas the digitization is the technical.
Digitization is the technical potential to extract digital data or information form the
physical world. Digitalization is the current use and development of these digitized
technologies in organizational or societal contexts. Together, digitization and
digitalization triggers sociotechnical phenomena, such as collaboration, sharing,

communication, cocreation and connectivity, which allow digital transformation and
the increased ability to adapt to change (Bockshecker et al, 2018). The digital
transformation is shaping new relations between humans and non-human elements in
organizations, as in the case of digital twins (Barata & Rupino, 2018). As expressed by
Love and Matthews (2019), in order for technology to generate value and benefits, the
innovations need to change organizational work, which needs to be planed and managed
carefully. Without changes in practices, processes, expectations, relationships or
business strategies, there would not be a revolution of industries. Looking back to
previous industrial revolution of steam and water mechanization, electricity, computer
and automatization, see figure 7, it is clear that the technology characterizing these
revolutions is more than just implementing technical artifacts.
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th

Mechanization Electrification Automation Digitalization Personalization
Figure 7 Industry revolutions: from Industry 1.0 to Industry 5.0 (Nahavandi, 2019)
2.2.7 Application fields

As described above, the application fields for digital twins are multiple. The evolution
of the digital twin has gone from integration information in the product lifecycle, to
design simulation, performance and health management in maintenance, and on to
integrated production and its environment. Similarly, Klostermeier et al (2019)
identifies three application areas: product lifecycle management, simulation in
development, as well as operation and of product and systems. The application fields
do not only vary with different digital twins but also with in the same scalable and
multi-faceted digital twin applications as well as the different digital twins of physical
objects are interconnected to each other. Technology and complexity can also vary
between the application fields of digital twins. Madni et al (2019) categories the
applications of digital twin in levels of sophistication or maturity, as illustrated in figure
7. Each level serves a different purpose and scope. The pre-digital twin exists prior to
the physical object and support upfront engineering as well as decision making in
conceptual and early design. The pre-digital twin, unlike a virtual model can be used to
deliver the final system and reused as a digital twin when the physical object exists.
The adaptive digital has user’s interface that learn from preferences of various instances
and contexts, and the intelligent digital twin is more autonomous in which the digital
twin learns from its environment.
Physical Physical Physical

Object Pre- Object Adaptive Object Intelligent
DT DT DT
Figure 8 Level of maturity (Madni et al, 2019).

2.3 Construction
Both the literature on digital twins in the manufacturing and the construction industry
is talking about integrating building information modelling with digital twin
technology. the manufacturing industry would like to integrate the digital twin of the
factory with building information modelling, and system information modelling, of the
same factory in order to facilitate the reconstruction of the factory or the shopfloor
(Badenko et al, 2021). On the other hand, the construction industry seems to have a
more integral role for the BIM technology in their digital twins. Pan & Zhang (2021a)
suggest a digital twin framework of BIM, internet of things, IoT, and data mining for
smart and advanced construction project managing. In another article Pan & Zhang
(2021b) describes BIM as a digital representation and a starting point of a digital twin.
In order for the industry 4.0 to revolutionize the construction industry, Maskuriy et al
(2019) describes BIM as the core of the cyber physical system and in cyber planning
physical system. Together with other technologies, as mentioned below, BIM will
increase the collaboration, automatically synchronize systems as well as design and
construction processes. This will in its turn increase both the quality and productivity
for the construction industry (Maskuriy et al, 2019). Similarly, Pan & Zhang (2021b)
both mentions BIM technology and digital twin as increasing in importance. However,
Pan & Zhang (2021b) highlight Artificial intelligence as the backbone of revolutionize
the construction industry and reshape the construction value chain and in that way
increase the automation, productivity and reliability of construction engineering and
management. The digital twin, IoT and other technologies such as blockchain, virtual
reality, VR, augmented reality, AR, and smart robotics are future direction of
construction 4.0 (Pan & Zhang, 2021b) and further elaborated below. Additional
technologies descried by Maskuriy et al (2019) are as following, radio frequency
identification, RFID, big data, cloud and mobile computing, geographical information
system, GIS, and adaptive manufacturing. Some of these are also described more
individually below.
According to Badenko et al (2021) is BIM and the digital twin developed in parallel to
each other in the fields of machine engineering and construction. The BIM technology
development might be behind due to the uniqueness of each construction project, and
BIM technology has hitherto focused on solving problems related to construction and
operation rather that integrating technology equipment (Badenko et al, 2021).
Moreover, (Tchana et al, 2019; Xu et al, 2014) criticize and highlight the issue of not
extracting, integrating or extending the building information and models between the
different design, construction and operation phases of the building lifecycle. (Tchana
et al, 2019) suggest that the same information model survive through all phase or at the
different models communicate with a comprehensive digital twin. On the same theme
as reshaping the construction process along with the value chain, integrated digital
delivery (Hwang et al, 2020; Liu et al, 2020) and integrated project delivery (Ma et al,
2018) digitalize the supply chain, design, construction and asset delivery to increase the
collaboration and integration for more sustainable building management. Similarly,
Tetik et al (2019) suggest a technology-based operation management and digital
construction in order to integrate the fragmented and loosed coupled actors of
construction projects. Badenko et al (2021) compares BIM level 1 with a digital model,
level 2 with a digital shadow and level 3 with a digital twin. BIM level 1 and 2 is often
used for lifecycle analysis, although level 3 contains the significant information
(Kaewunruen et al, 2020). Sustainability audits can thus be advanced by digital twins.

2.3.1 Building information modelling
BIM, or Building information modeling, is described by Pan & Zhang (2021) “as a
process of creating models with semantically rich information in a common data
environment to accelerate the digitalization in the Architecture, Engineering,
Construction, and Operation (AECO)”. Its focus is on buildings and infrastructure, and
the information thereof. Since the introduction of the Industry Foundation Classes
(IFC), an industry-wide used open-source file format for sharing BIM data often called
openBIM, more integrated methods and tools for sharing construction data have
appeared (Boje et al, 2020). BIM has been suggested by Succar (2009) as a tool for
keeping information and enhancing collaboration between the different stages of
design, construction, and operation, denoting the model in different stages as D-BIM,
C-BIM, and O-BIM. Xu et al (2014) continues Succar’s work providing a framework
for BIM-enabled information life-cycle management. Tchana et al (2019) likens the
BIM model to the PML in manufactory as a management tool for the building’s
lifecycle. Kaewunruen et al (2020) highlights the BIM as a tool for lifecycle assessment
when paired with a digital twin. Even though they see them as different parts of a whole,
Kaewunruen et al (2020) often use BIM and DT as synonyms for each other, saying
BIM is for construction and DT is for infrastructure.
The BIM model works as a facilitator of data, storing detailed information regarding de
thousands of materials and objects used in a project, and can often be several GB large.
(Tchana, 2019; Pan & Zhang 2021). The amount of information, and thus data
available, in a model increase as the model goes from design phase to the as-built
model; when there is a larger number of components in the model with detailed
information connected to them. Boje et al (2020) describes the evolution of BIM, from
the strictly object bound 3D model to incorporating both time and cost estimation, thus
creating the 4D- and 5D BIM. This fifth dimension Boje et al (2020) describes being
accepted in the literature and industry, even though this could be derived from the space
time continuum. When literature and industry have discussed 5D and higher numbers
of BIM dimensions, nD BIM, Boje et al (2020) argues that the D has stopped denoting
dimensions and instead taken on the meaning domains. Further they argue that there is
little consensus on how to categorise these higher dimensions, but that combining the
research made into different nD BIM’s respectively, is the prerequisite for BIM to
transcend into a construction digital twin.
The IFC standard often used in BIM projects was created to transfer information from
one model to another, and not to be used dynamically and modified continually (Boje
et al, 2020). By using software tools to extract semantic data, industry and literature try
to find ways to shape the static IFC file into a more malleable version to meet the need
for rapid data acquisition and new management models (Pan & Zhang 2021; Boje et al
2020; Tchana et al 2019). A problem is the large range of software tools created for this
purpose and the lack of a system collecting the heterogenous data, a gap the digital twin
paradigm can fill (Boje et al 2020). As described earlier, Lim et al (2021) defines the
digital twin as a “high-fidelity virtual replica of the physical asset with real-time two-
way communication for simulation purposes and decision-aiding features for product
service enhancement”. With digital context and near real-time connection to the
physical world, the digital twin is a reflection of the physical asset at any given time
(Boje et al, 2020). The digital twin paradigm calls for the digital representation to have
a higher level of detail and be scalable. Interconnecting ranges from component level
representation, to potentially nation or global-wide digital twins.

2.3.2 Digital tools
RFID or Radio-Frequency IDentification use a tag and reader system to track and
identify objects by using electromagnetic fields (Srewil Y., Scherer R.J. (2013) The tag
used can be passive, activated and powered by the radio waves send by the reader, or
active, powered by a battery. The closeness required between the reader and the tag is
significantly reduced by using the battery powered tag. Compared to other often used
systems for identification like the barcode and QR code, the RFID doesn’t need the line
of sight to be read and multiple users can use the same RFID at the same time. The
RFID can be put inside components like walls and fixture thus enabling the RFID to
function even when the component is covered.
IoT or Internet of Things, is the description of objects, or things, that has sensors,
software, and other technologies that enables them to connect to the internet and share
data. These objects can be everything from the fridge to the smart watch to the plumbing
and lighting fixtures in the built environment. In construction there likewise is a range
of devices that can be used. From monitoring and measuring the humidity and
temperature of hardening concrete to identify workers, components, tools, and
machines at the site.
AI or Artificial intelligence is the use of advanced logarithms to make machines able

to extract and process data, and from the data draw conclusions on how best to act on
the information. These conclusions can be drawn by the AI based on set conditions like
with the early robotic vacuum cleaners; if robot hit hard surface turn right, or on
machine learning, ML, and Deep learning, DL, incorporating historical data combined
with present inputs to adjust suggestions/action for desired outcome like with later
robotic vacuum cleaners; if robot hit wall register location and save for better planned
vacuuming next time. Over time more sophisticated AI have evolved writing algorithms
themselves as a mean to reach a goal, but the desired outcome is defined by the humans
making the AI.
Blockchain is a list, or block, of recorded data coupled with a timestamp showing when
and by whom the data was created. By incorporating cryptographic data created in the
block earlier and uploading the updated list to a decentralised network of servers the
new data is validated and altercations in previous data is nearly impossible (Elgaish et
al, 2020). Blockchains ability to trace and prove authentication is used in a variety of
ways, including but not limited to cryptocurrencies, smart contracts, and supply chain
management (Nielsen et al (2020).
VR or virtual reality make a human experience a virtual model or space by simulating

the user’s physical presence in the virtual world, somewhat disconnecting the user from
the physical world. The user most often has a headset on with headphones and small
screen in front of the eyes coupled with hand held devices to control the virtual reality,
and sometimes other senses like touch and smell are simulated. AR or augmented
reality is when the real world is enhanced by a computer-generated model interacting
or hiding physical objects under the model layer. AR blends the physical world with
the virtual and provides real-time interaction between the two. Users can then see how
the 3D modelled object will function in its intended environment. Simulations and other
training for future scenarios can thus be done by handling real objects connected to the
context they later will be used in. Like in VR, hardware worn by the user connecting
the virtual and physical world is needed for AR to function.

BIM viewers are used in production to make large BIM files able to be viewed by
handheld devices like smartphones and tablets, connecting the information contained
in the BIM model to the workers on site. By using AR and measuring tools in the viewer
the management and workers on site can use the model to plan the work.
Communication and work-related issues can be made in connection to what part of the
construction they address, thus enhancing the understanding of connected parties.
2.3.3 Smart construction site

Site managers in construction can use the digital twin as a way of organising the
construction site. By incorporating VR, AR, IoT, RFID, and other digital tools the
progress of the construction can be monitored and managed (Pan & Zhang, 2021). By
using tools like data mining and simulation of processes, insights can be made on
various parts like material logistics, management of work flow, and cost prediction. To
get a better understanding of site progress UAVs (e.g., drones) and other form of image
collecting vehicles can be used to compare the process to the modelled building.
Kifokeris and Koch (2020) made a list on ways the blockchain technology could be
coupled to different parts of the construction process.
Safety issues and workplace hazards can by the use of a digital model be addressed in
advanced and mitigated (Nnaji & Karakhan, 2020; Boje et al, 2021). Mixed-reality
simulation help construction workers and machine operators identify risk regarding
construction phases and machine operations in advance. Training on less frequent parts
of the construction, like the erection and dismantling of a tower crane, can be done in a
VR environment reducing hazards during training to almost zero. Fall hazards can be
identified using the BIM model connected to a hazard finding algorithm making
construction work safer (S. Zhang et al, 2015). A drawback S. Zhang et al found was
that the safety plan made by the algorithm must be updated often and that not all
construction parts were modelled correctly, showing gaps between actual construction
practices and that made by the model. Boje et al (2020) suggest applying the digital
twin paradigm for similar problems, utilising connected sensors for real-time
monitoring of the site and the whereabouts of workers to identified and mitigate
hazardous situations before they happen.
Traditionally material supply is often excluded from supply chain management since
the work is carried out by a variety of small and medium subcontractors engaged in
fixed price contracts (Grief et al, 2020). Greif et al (2020) creates a lightweight digital
twin for these non-high-tech industries. In their case study for a bulk material supplier,
they work with sensors for tracking time, volume, and usage of the silos etc., and
combining the data generated with information on limits for vehicles hauling them and
scheduled rotations of the silos. The digital twin uses AI and other algorithms to process
this information, together with historical and present known data and suggests best
routes for action and calculates the dividends for each customer. The operators can thus
either accept the suggested plan of action provided or alter them. At any given time, the
company knows where their equipment is and total fill levels, enhancing predictability
and provides cost saving.
Kifokeris and Koch (2020) find that integrating smooth and transparent information,
material, and economic flows within supply chains is a vital part to enhance logistics
and ensure a successful result in construction projects. They continue that the need for

accuracy and dependability on the different flows, coupled with a need for traceability
and accountability, makes blockchains suitable tool as a validator of above traits. This
creates a mutual understanding between different stakeholders (Boje et al, 2020).
2.3.4 Project delivery

Nielsen et al (2020) suggested a framework for smart contracts in the manufacturing
industry. Here a digital twin together with blockchain technology was used in a case
study to protect intellectual property rights (IPR) and guaranteed trust between
stakeholders that the work carried out by an outsourced manufacturer’s machines was
within agreed tolerance levels thus ensuring desired quality of the end products. In their
paper they claim that for every new collaboration a certain level of trust must be
attained. The company owning the IPR must give the contracted company access to
sensitive information, while the contractor must share details on how their
manufacturing processes work. By giving all stakeholders access to progress made by
the machines, and using blockchain to verify correct use of data, Nielsen et al (2020)
state that trust can be created and maintained between different companies. They further
state that this trust render contracts approved by lawyers unnecessary.
Elgaish et al (2020) describe the emerging literature on smart contracts in construction,

and develop and prove a framework for integrated project delivery based on blockchain.
This to enable and create trust between clients, contractors, and subcontractors making
agreed milestone payments possible connected to actual work done at site; in part
mirroring the result of the case study carried out by Nielsen et al (2020). Elgaish et al
(2020) cite several studies on how to incorporate blockchain technology with nD BIM,
recording and certifying work progress and changes made during design and
construction. Similar, Kifokeris and Koch (2020) list several research articles focusing
on blockchain as a smart contract enabler within the construction sector, but finds few
use cases where the technology has been implemented.
When handing over of a project after the construction phase, several studies show that
there is a high risk for information to get lost between the different stages. Xu et al,
(2014) provides a schedule for how information should be connected between these
different models with the end model being the operation-BIM, O-BIM, carrying
information needed. Tchana et al (2019) agrees with the need for different models to
talk with each other, but the models used, they argue, should be connected to a digital
twin to safeguard traceability of decisions and model history. This to avoid information
being rewritten and lost.
According to Love & Matthews (2019) does the real value and benefit of digital twin
technologies becomes realized when it is used from engineering till asset management.
Love & Matthews (2019) describes how, and not just why digital technologies should
be adapted by asset owners and organizations to generate value and expected benefits.
Asset owners can require a digital twin at handover for real-time operation and
maintenance processes, as well as having the asset delivered more effectively and
efficiently. A need and demand driven adoption of digital technologies are better than
being confronted or pressured to adopt latest technology. Benefits grounded in practice,
and lifecycle implementation enhance the automation, extension and transformation
changes of digital technology implementation.

2.4 Built environment
Lately the industry is facing the change of including operation and facility management
to the traditional architecture engineering and construction industry mindset. This
integrates key actors and stakeholders such as owners and operators, allows a
reconsideration of the workflow in the entire delivery process, and enables the bigger
perspective of the built environment lifecycle. In the literature of digital twins within
the built environment thus often refers to the AECO architecture, engineering,
construction and operation sector (Lu et al, 2020a) or AEC/FM industry, i.e.,
architecture, engineering, construction and facility management (e.g., Deng et al, 2021;
Lu et al, 2020). Urban Planning early showed an interest of digital twins (Ketzler et al,
2020) and the literature is starting to attract attention to digital twins in the built
environment (Deng et al, 2021). Deng et al (2021) suggest an evolution ladder from
BIM to digital twins for the built environment in which BIM get accompanied by
simulation, sensors, artificial intelligence. At the digital twin ladder category, the
buildings can communicate and interact with the rest of the built environment.
According to Deng et al (2021) is the next generation digital twin scalable from building
to multi building communities and to city level in order for buildings to share real time
data. However, current literature only describes different aspects and relevant concepts
of the next generation digital twin and has not yet reached the highest ladder category
of a digital twin. The BIM level is fragmented into the design, construction and
operation phase while the simulation lever allows for evaluations of e.g., energy
performance or the thermal environment and allows simulations of e.g., future
construction processes (Deng et al, 2021). By adding IoT the energy performance and
indoor environment, space utilization, and thermal comfort can be further managed, and
construction processes, hazards, and building can be monitored at both individual and
portfolio level. The artificial intelligence further turns the simulation and monitoring
into real time predictions.
2.4.1 Buildings
Similarly, to Deng et al (2021), Lu et al (2020b) and Lu et al (2020c) describes an
advancement from BIM towards digital twin in asset management, operation and
maintenance. BIM enabled asset management lacks in technology aspects in terms of
interoperability and integration, in information aspects such as level of detail, LOD,
organizational aspects in terms of learning and workflow integration, and lacks in
standards related issues such as aligning different standards in process, technology,
different life cycle stages and disciplines (Lu et al 2020c). The digital twin technology
is information richer and has greater analytic capability compared to BIM (Lu et al
2020c) and must include requirements of intelligence, integration, efficiency,
interoperability. The smart asset management represent the building and infrastructure
level of a digital twin during the operation and maintenance phase of the building
lifecycle. Moreover, design, construction and the retrofitting, refurbishment phase of
the building lifecycle as well as a city-, organizational and asset level of digital twins
also exists (Lu et al 2020c). The same authors present a digital twin framework, scalable
form system level to building level and community level in a case study of a university
campus. The framework includes a data acquisition layer, a transmission later, a digital
model layer, as well as a data and model integration layer. The Digital twin for a
building and infrastructure can be seen as sub digital twin of the higher city and
community level. This connection could further understand social and economic

impacts and optimize city services such as waste management and transportations. The
service layer of the dynamic building and city digital twin is security, health,
transportation, energy, space utilization, event and failure predictions, asset and
environmental management (Lu et al 2020a). A roadmap of trust, function and purpose
are presented by the authors to facilitate the implementation of a digital twin and
building and city level. The digital twin of a building and city are illustrated in figure 2
and 3. Same authors also present an asset information model to support the adoption of
a digital twin in which the building information models would communicate with an
asset information model which in its turn are connected to a digital twin platform
(Heaton & Parkilad, 2020). Moreover, Building-, asset-, and space management system
can be integrated and create a database to enable anomaly detection for the asset,
operation and maintenance (Xie et al, 2020).
Figure 9 Building digital twin
2.4.2 Cities
Yang et al (2020) do not mentions digital twin but suggest a IoT oriented intelligent
building management system for building and building portfolios. Intelligent buildings
are expected to be highly efficient, save energy and provide smart services for a more
sustainable city and energy management development in a value added IoT ecosystem
chain. Similarly, Woodhead et al (2018) suggest the digital twin as the core of an IoT
network created ecosystem that continuous to function when construction project
traditionally is completed. Moreover, Yang et al (2020) recommend governments to
focus on eliminate regulation bottlenecks and provide policies, user privacy and
security so that the industry and society can increase investment motivation and develop
relevant technologies. The digital twin for cities is scalable from building, district to
city level and should add value for citizens and clients (Ketzler et al, 2020). Fan et al
(2019) suggest a city digital twin by integrating artificial intelligence with human
intelligence to enhance management processes. Urban buildings of digital twins for
smart cities will interact with other urban systems, such as transportation, climate and
energy grids to achieve energy efficiency, sustainability and optimize performance.
Figure 10 City digital twin

3 Method
3.1 Research strategy

The selected strategy for the research is a mixed method. The reason for choosing a
mixed methods strategy was to combine both quantitative and qualitative research and,
in that way, get a more problem driven approach associated with pragmatism. The
sequence is an exploratory sequential design in which the quantitative method was used
to inform the qualitative method. However, the qualitative was considered the main
aspect of the research strategy whereas the quantitative was considered as subsidiary.
The purpose of the sequential link was to take the analysis further and inform the
direction the research should take. The quantitative findings related to RQ1-RQ3 was
informing the direction and supports the analysis of RQ4 and RQ5 which are more
qualitative.
exploratory sequentialdesign: quan →QUAL
3.2 Literature review

An initial literature search was conducted at ScienceDirect or order to develop the
research proposal and research plan. From this search four scientific articled were
selected as core contributors to the literature review. The search string where “Digital
twin” and “Construction” and the search result were limited to articles published
between 2019-2021. The selected articles are listed in table 1. The selection, and
validation, criteria were based on the digital twin in the title, as a key word, and the
content of the article possible contributing the theory of digital twin technology prior
to project delivery. However, in order to get a better theoretical understanding of digital
twin technology in general, in the early design, and in the bigger perspective of the built
environment additional articles were selected. A second search at ScienceDirect were
performed with the search string “Digital twin” and (Construction OR City OR
Building). The search results were delimited in year, journal and type of articles. 119
articles were showed in the search result, only a few were selected, and not many
articles got verified. Snowballing, and occasional literature search on google scholar
provided additional articles trough purposive sampling, iteratively throughout the
literature review. Moreover, a theoretical sampling was performed to investigate the
role of technology in organisation, innovations, and sustainable development.
Table 1 Selected articles in initial literature search
Article Year Journal

Towards a semantic construction digital twin: directions for Automation in
2020
future research Construction
Computers in
Peeking into the void: digital twins for construction site logistics 2020
Industry
A BIM data mining integrated digital twin framework for Automation in
2021
advanced project management Construction
The ‘how’ of benefits management for digital technology: from Automation in
2019
engineering to asset management Construction

3.3 Data collection
The data were collected through data triangulation in form of informant triangulation
including aspects of space triangulations. The reason for choosing data triangulation
was to validate the findings through different sources of information. While the mixed
of research strategies where to take the analysis further and inform the direction of the
research, the data triangulation was contributing to more accurate measurements and a
more complete picture. The combination of data collection methods were interviews,
observations and documents. The space triangulation differs between global, national
and regional and was partly a consequence of the mixed method design and the
informant triangulation. Both the document data and observation data allowed a more
objective collection whist the collection of interview data was more subjective to
research bias.
3.3.1 Documents
The documentary data were collected from written texts, digital communication and
visual sources. The written texts were reports from companies as well as industry and
research collaborations. The digital communication were webpages, and the visual
sources were pictures and videos from the same type of sources. The search for
document has also been trough purposive sampling, early on in the research.
3.3.2 Observations
The observations were performed at a summit for an international organization with the
construction industry. The organization in question specialize in digital transformation
by enabling collaboration, digital workflow and standards. The organization offers a
community, network and sharing information between practitioners in the construction
industry and have national membership organizations sharing the same goal as the
international organization. The observations intended to provide data regarding the
coordination of collective efforts and engagement. The observations included both
presentation and panel discussions from members as well as the even coordination.
3.3.3 Interviews
The interviews were performed in order to collect data in terms of words, opinions and
experience regarding the complexed environment of design, construction and operation
of construction projects. The interviews were semi-structured one-to-one interviews,
allowing each interview to develop differently rather than keeping each interview the
same. Each interview where web-based with real-time and visual contact. Field notes
were made during the interviews and each interview where recorded. The participants
are listed in table 2 below.
Table 2 Interview participants
Interviewees Code
Real estate company (public) RE1
Real estate company (private) RE2
Construction Project Manager (Consultant) CM
Research institute and innovation partner (public) RI

3.4 Data analysis
In order to get a better understanding of the data both descriptive and interpretive
analysis has been performed. Both the quantitative and qualitative data have been
prepared, initially explored, analyzed, presented and validated.
3.4.1 Quantitative data

The quantitative data was mainly used for answering RQ1-RQ3 and is manly gather
trough the document collection. The data has been coded prior to the data collection,
categorized and checked the numbers as a preparation stage. After the data has been
prepared, obvious trends and correlations where initially explored. The data was then
linked to the different research questions and hypothesis in the analysis stage. After
being analysed the data was presented and displayed in tables, figures and written
interpretations. In order to validate the data, it was compared to the literature review
and integrated with the qualitative data, which is a key element in mixed methods
research.
3.4.2 Qualitative data

The qualitative data was manly intended to contribute to RQ4 and RQ5 and manly
collected through the interviews and observations. The qualitative data was prepared
trough cataloguing the text and visual data and by transcribing the interviews. Recurrent
items and issues were explored and nots, memos were taken to capture ideas. The data
was then coded and categorized to find concept in the analysis stage. The findings then
got presented in written interpretation and points were illustrated in quotes. The
qualitative data were validated through the triangulation of collection methods and
trough comparison with the literature reives.
3.5 Report structure

The purpose, motivation and wider context of the research are presented in the
introduction. The literature review is presented in the theory chapter, presenting
existing literature on role of technology, digital twins in general, with in construction,
and within the built environment. The literature review also demonstrates how this
thesis related to, and ideas generated from existing literature. The methodology chapter
presents describes in detail how the research was performed. Following by the result
and finding which present the data from the documents, interviews and observations.
The result is then analysis in relation to the current literature and discussed in relation
the ideas and issues arising for current literature. Followed by a conclusion of main
theoretical contributions of this thesis and connected to the research purpose and
contextual background.
3.6 Research ethics

In order to protect the interest of the participants of this research, interviewees have
been sent background information prior to interview, been asked before recording, and
asked before publishing. The research also includes aspects of individual rights,
sustainability and ecology.

4 Result and findings
4.1 Digital twin initiative

There is lots of digital twin initiatives to be found across industries today. According to
the digital twin consortium (2021), which is a cross-domain innovation cluster, has the
digital twin already transformed how manufactures build costumer goods, aircrafts and
building structures. The digital twin has also transformed organizations manage
production lines and how cities manage their infrastructure. The digital twin consortium
is building a cross industry ecosystem to share standards, policies, architecture and
creating an opensource collaborative approach to help accelerate the adoption of digital
twin technology. Today the market is confused, interoperability is limited, and high
stakes hinders the utilization of digital twin technology. Thus, while driving the
development innovations needs to be propelled and economic value needs to be
demonstrated during the process. To fulfil its potential, the concept of digital twin(s)
has to evolve into a real and meaningful construct and not just another idea on the never-
ending digital hype cycle (Arup, 2019). The current state of digital twin indicates that
the technology can possible have the protentional to track climate change, radically
modernise infrastructure, water and transport, unite nations and contribute to reaching
the sustainable development goals.
The digital twin has been compared to a crystal bowl, to see what’s going to happen
before making business-critical decisions (Digital Twin Consortium, 2021). It enhances
operational efficiency and interoperability within product lifecycles. Leading edge
venders, consumers, researchers and government can all participate and achieve more
together, by sharing use cases and help developing opensource code. By collaboration
companies can accelerate beyond market confusion and generate value through new
complex project. The digital twin initiatives within the built environment and
construction industry sector are listed in table 1 below.
Table 3 Selection of digital twin initiatives for in the built environment and construction industry
Projects Type Description Country

Örebro Stad City Relationship City/Building Sweden
Karlskrona Stad City Relationship City/Construction Sweden
Göteborg Stad City Simulation and Urban Planning Sweden
Digital Twin City Centre City Digital Twin Technology Sweden
Akademiska Hus Building Facility/Asset Management Sweden
Vasakronan Building Facility/Asset Management Sweden
Statsbygg Building Facility/Asset Management Norway
Celsius (Uppsala) Construction Digital and paperless construction Sweden
Hugin (Uppsala) Construction Digital project delivery Sweden
Construction City Construction Digital project delivery Norway
Digital Twin Consortium Construction Digital twin Technology Global
Building Smart Construction Innovation Cluster Global

4.1.1 State of the art review
Building Smart is an international organization within the construction industry and
have formed a digital twin working group in order to define the digital twin and the role
of an industry organizations can have to better unlock social, environmental, and
societal value for the entire built asset industry (Building Smart, 2020). They emphasis
on the development of an ecosystem of digital twins and defines the digital twin as a
digital representation of a physical asse, linked to each other to regularly exchange data
throughout the performance based optimal design (PBOD) lifecycle management and
the use phase. The digital twin is a question of both market pull and technology push
and the next step for the further development, implementing and utilization is to simply
‘roll up our sleeves´, engage with other companies and closely collaborate between
industry and academia in a hands-on approach (Granlund group, 2020). When
conversations swich focus form BIM to digital twin, conversations have got stuck in
trying to reach a shared wide understanding what the digital twin means. The digital
twin became a metaphor for all solutions to the ongoing fragmentation issues within
the built environment. Despite inspirable examples of innovative tools and applications
for efficient information exchange, there is still a lack of scalable and widespread
commercial digital twin solutions. Multiple actors need to be involved to generate to
proposed value, but neither actor is willing to join until the ecosystem is sufficiently
populated (Granlund group, 2020).
The imperfections of the real estate and construction industry needs to be discussed as
well. In order to move forward with the digital twin, the concept needs to be embraced
and the digital twin approach needs to be adopted in all new projects (Atkin, 2019). The
journey of creating and maintaining the digital twin needs to be respected. By focusing
on the purpose of each lifecycle stage and understand the benefits of each milestone,
value is expected to increase along the way. The digital twin expands as it incorporates
each new simulation and use case and slowly building up a complete view of the entire
building across its lifecycle (Deloitte, 2019). Entirely new ways of designing buildings
will start to emerge and adding humans to the information loop between a building and
its digital twin, is crucial for optimising the occupational experience of the building and
not just optimize the physical infrastructure (Deloitte, 2019). Siemens in collaboration
with Tum Institute for advanced study (2019) expressing a vision of reaching intelligent
self-adapting buildings. When it comes to the Swedish context, construction 4.0 is
compared to build ship on land (Smart built environment, 2017). Collaboration,
sharing, learning from other industries and a common digital platform for information
throughout the building lifecycle are identified solutions, but the digital twin is not
mentioned.
Looking closer to the more local or regional digital twin initiatives, presented in table
1, it is possible to find inspiring examples and demonstrated values form different
lifecycle stages. At city level, both large cities and semi-large cities demonstrate digital
twin applications with different purposes. Karlskrona (2021) is developing a digital
twin and city information mode, CIM by integrating BIM, GIS, Digital platform, 3D-
model and photogrammetry in order to facilitate urban planning and procurement
procedures. Örebro stad (2021) also have a digital twin for building permits and urban
planning, but with a slightly more focus on building utilization. Akademiska Hus
(2021) are scanning all their facilities in collaboration with Zynka BIM and have their
most digitalized campus in Örebro.

The digital twin city centre is a research project in Gothenburg to develop a digital twin
framework for best practice (Digital twin city centre, 2021). Their digital twin planform
includes data collection, management, analysis, generation, visualization, utilization
and sharing. Moreover, urban planning, design and construction all includes aspects of
modelling simulation at district and city level, visualization, auralization, data
management and integration.
4.1.2 Built environment

The interviewee at the Swedish research institute acknowledged the rise of initiatives
made with regards to digital twin. The initiatives, by for instance the municipalities
of Örebro and Gothenburg municipality, is facing a number of problems according to
our interviewee. Today data is generated by a lot of different sources and it’s not always
possible to extract this data easily and automatically. One reason for this is the
question of ownership of the data generated. Even though the client is the one ordering
the work and responsible for operation and maintenance, the data produced can be the
property of the vendors selling the solutions and could be a part of their business
plan. Connected to this the data generated could be stored in a closed data format only
accessible by certain programs. Here the strive to standardize made by companies isn’t
necessary in the interest of the public, since every lock up to a certain format is a lock
up to a certain system. Another problem with the built environment is the scope of
buildings and infrastructure to be connected. Adding to the complexity is the number
of actors involved and their goals, with some real estate owners starting to create their
own digital twins and some not interested. To further complicate the matter Sweden has
over 200 regions and municipalities stretching from municipalities with few inhabitants
to larger regions like Stockholm and Västra Götaland. Creating the framework for
constructing a city or region digital twin is tedious work and not feasible to do for every
small municipality. Here collaboration across borders is crucial and the research
institute act as a node for knowledge sharing and collaboration. According to our
interviewee the medium sized municipalities might come the furthers as they are more
agile than larger municipalities because of the lesser scope; while they still have the
financial resources for the work to succeed.
A way forward to find issues associated with above problems, and with today’s
legislation can be working with creating digital twin development plans. Researchers
can find conflicts between demands on data for a city digital twin framework and
bottlenecks in data accumulation associated with ownership and standards. A digital
twin-based development plan can in itself be a very effective democracy tool since
citizens can access suggestions and decisions on city development easily and
intuitively, and the consequences and benefits of the same. At the same time a digital
twin-based development plan means that models instead of drawings can be a way of
delivering the required information a municipality needs to collect.

4.2 Asset and facility management
The first step in creating a digital twin is to gather all information related to building
and structure that data. A lot of time is spent on searching for data within the
construction industry. For example, unstructured pdf documents are for little use and
takes time to find. Instead, data should be stored in databases and e.g., cloud storage
solutions for both building information systems, geographic information systems and
technical documents. It is the connection in between that creates value and not just for
one building but on a portfolio level. It takes time to structure all this data, and when
data has been structured there is more systems that needs to be connected. A building
contains tremendous amount data and lots of sensors. However, most of these data is
local and unstructured. The sensors data needs to be structured and connected in a
relation to the other data. In order to utilize the data, it is crucial to know what it is and
where it is. If technical documents were connected to building automation system or
the alarm management system, they will be used more effectively and efficient. We
recently signed the contract for a solution that enables all building automation data to
be stored in a cloud environment. The connections of many components interconnected
is creating the digital twin. Maintenance of the building automations at the local servers
are a big challenge today, since it doesn’t communicate with anything. Another service
application would be to connect room booking system with the cloud storage solution
in order to regulate devices for indoor environment and security etc. Then the digital
twin would be predictive in its automated response to the physical building. Today we
utilize drones to scan roofs and facades to defects and predictive analysis and
maintenance. With large amount of data, machine learning can predict how long time
or with what trends might lead to water leakages or cracks etc. The digital twin could
also be used as a tool for space utilization, such as office-Airbnb etc, especially in times
like this with Covid-19.
“It not just about the modelling, it’s also about the processes and how we can utilize
the data. That’s where I think the digital twin create value.” – RE1
4.2.1 Sustainability
The Norwegian construction industry has set up a roadmap and a vision of a sustainable,
competitive and a completely digital construction. In 2025 the goal is to reach 25%
lower cost, 50% faster project completion and 50% lower climate impact. To reach the
vison and goals, only two vehicles are considered to be needed. The first one is digital
construction sites, and the second vehicle is the digital twin (Byggenæringens
Landsforening, 2017). The construction industry is a large contributor to the climate
impact today, but also bear great potential to help society in facing many sustainability
challenges. Thus, digitalization of the construction industry will play an important role
for sustainability. However, we need to work together and in a bigger perspective, there
is a big leap from simple technology solutions form single elements and lifting the
entire industry. In order to create value from digitalization, the data need to be
structured and accessible for anyone who need it. The Digital twin is the comprehensive
tool for this structure and accessibility to enable the collaboration needed.
“Digitalizing and sustainability will be the game changer

for the construction industry.” – RE1

4.2.2 Lifecycle management
The building lifecycle spans from the idea of a building to its demolition. To enable
circular economy and tor the material and components to be reused, it is also crucial to
know what it is. Today it is very complicated to create the documentation and
recertification needed for materials and products to be moved from one building to
another in renovation, reconstruction and demolition. Hopefully the buildings will last
for 100 years or more, hence data needs to be available for the generations to come.
Today BIM has been a tool for design and engineering but starts to become a tool for
contractors. It is important that we don’t break the digital contingency and information
flow but rather use the model when building and the proper thing to do would be to
continue this information flow into the operation phase. It is important to have this
lifecycle perspective when starting to collect the data, and think about the next phase,
what would they need. If we fail to see what data the next phases or generation might
need, we will fail to develop a digital twin and reaching a sustainable construction
industry.
“Start thinking digital twin before thinking about building” – RE1
The biggest challenge in digitalization today is the rework between actors in the value
chain e.g., an engineer creating a model which the contractor needs to change, or rather
rebuilt, when pricing in order to price it accurately. We create and rebuild data to many
times instead of having a consistent core where information is being added and has the
same remaining structure. In other information is needed that what being provided in
the model it is often easier to create a new model. We are trying to change this by
checking digital maturity and align the different actors and disciplines.
4.2.3 Digital maturity

In order to check the digital maturity between and within different stages, we have
developed a BIM enabled software program that validates the model, information and
data needed for upcoming stages. For example, what information should be in place,
which object and connections should be defined as well as which and when product
data should be ready. To connect product data to the information system and digital
twin, we use get-in data, which is a personal number to the product and exist on all
product but are not traditionally utilized in the construction industry. It provides data
regarding the product as well as the supplier and we are currently looking into how we
can digitalize the logistics, connect and utilize this data.
“We have to stop doing the things we do and start

doing things in new ways.” – RE1
We need to We need to work on process and infrastructural change prior to adopting

technology. The technology has been in the spotlight for long, but lately there has been
a clear increase and realization of emphasis on that it is more about the processes and
mindset. Technology is simple, yet it is difficult to get digital maturity into the
organisation. Digital maturity is so much more than installing a sensor or scanning a
building with a drone. We have to stop doing the things we do and start doing things in
new ways. Technology is developing rapidly, but it is hard to get people onboard and
to change mindsets in order to utilize the technology. Some of our jobs, like engineering
and calculation is a computers biggest interest and the bigger amount of data the better.

We need to get people onboard and develop processes good enough to generate the
potential value of new technology and change processes fast enough. We need to create
space for innovation by integrating people, technology and organizations. We have to
have the courage to try new thing or experiment and have the users and use cases in
focus meanwhile. Traditionally there has been more focus on pilot project, but now the
hole industry is making more cumulative progress and more continuously.
4.2.4 Construction
We did have a project, completed 2019, with efforts to completely digitalize many of
the processes. However, I believe that many projects in different cities are starting to
get there as well as seeing paperless construction sites, using lots of virtual design and
construction. We also tried gaming simulation for staff training and instructions and
using a digital twin of the construction site in question provided a much better value
and result. It would also be of great benefit to not to cut the information flow of
decision-making processes within design, engineering and construction. This
information does not often exist, and we don’t have the practices or processes today to
connect this info. For sustainability is this getting increasingly important, it would
shorten the decision-making process in recuse, and increase the flexibility when
adjusting the building. To be able to take care of the building in a different way. Much
of the city-data is open today, and more data will be available in the future. It is
imaginable that transportation, traffic etc could communicate with a construction site.
BIM and GIS are, as proved, able to connect and integrate. Much of the energy data
could possibly be shared between the city and the building, as well as the construction
sites could possibly be used as energy producers. With technology such as smart grid
and local grid solutions, the construction site could be connected checked and regulated
after usage and need. When it comes to model-based as-built drawings, automated
digitalized inspection and verifications, we talk a lot about not asking for blueprint and
to require an as-built model.

We have started scanning excising buildings, but it is better to get correct information
at project delivery. Instead of mapping that information. Scanning the building provides
an architect like model, since it is not possible to scan installation trough ceilings and
walls. So, in addition we connect the database of technical documents to the scanned
model. Which a data structure is it possible to map the data differences and translate
the structure of the documents to the structure of the scanned model. There has been an
increase in more collaborative contract relationships, which shows a change in mindset
as willingness to change processes. Integrated project delivery, different forms of
partnering both includes different interaction amongst the actors of the project. Also
engineering performed by suppliers and subcontractors are more common lately and
thus transfer some of the power from architects and engineers. There are many
incitements for digitalization and sustainability. Client requirements, green loans for
bream excellence certified project, which also gives incitement for the contractor to get
everyone onboard.
“A digital twin that are alive when the construction project is being delivered
is very important. It is very rare to get complete reliable documentation at project
delivery practices today” – RE1

4.2.6 Standard and regulation
The standards that we use need to be digitalized as well. Today many of them only exist
in dead and dumb documents. The good thing with data is that it easy for computers to
control rulesets and regulations. By providing components with numbers, rulesets can
easily be applied. Same thing with product templates, to make them readable for
machines enables rule settings. For examples simple rules such as a date where it says
guarantee. With these standard and regulation, it is possible to make sure that every
building is not different. At a national scale the authorities changed regulation and
processes, so it is possible to apply for a building permit digitally with the BIM model.
The BIM model would be matched or put into the GIS model where the regulation plan
is connected. Regulations and requirements regarding traffic, logistics, culture,
commercial-, private, and residential areas are showed in the combined models. The
collaboration with municipalities is more iterative, the municipality can do changes,
counter suggestions, or make changes together. It is not only paperless but the
visualization, standardisation makes the decision-making process more efficient, agile
and contemporary. BIM-based building permits are a start of this. Just like in machine
reading labels on products, we don’t want pdf documents we want the data in models.
A question to an open database to get the information that we need. To see the building
constriction as an extreme climate load is a realization that changes people mindset.
“We also need to digitalize the standards that we use.

Today many of the only exist in dead dumb documents.” – RE1
4.3 Design and construction

The construction of a commercial property in a large town north of Stockholm, Sweden,
was done almost entirely based on a BIM 3D model. This is a pioneer project in the
Swedish context with regards to digital maturity and was in the forefront of construction
projects to come. Each on their own, the client - a large Swedish commercial real estate
company, and the project management company, was looking for ways of working with
a construction process digitally. They wanted a departure from the dominating standard
of designing in an information rich 3D environment, to create dumbed down printed
2D drawings and documentation for the construction phase. The project initiated in
2017 and finished late 2020 was a success, delivered two months ahead of schedule and
roughly 5% under budget. Benchmarked against a similar project the construction had
a reduction of transports by 80% while at the same time reducing the need for rework
by 80%. The project focused on a sophisticated BIM model and was developed without
the digital twin paradigm in mind.
4.3.1 Early design

The embryo for how an entirely digital construction process could be achieved came
from a large and complex infrastructure project in Stockholm. To encompass and
understand the intricate geometrics of the project the project owners, the municipality,
demanded that the project would have a reliable 3D model as a base. Our interviewee
at the project management company (C1) was at the time employed at a consultancy
bureau and worked to ensure buildability and reliability of the model used. He was later
involved in the design of the commercial property as a digital strategist, working to
structure the digital collaboration between designing consultants and making sure that

the model was detailed enough to be used on site, and that the workers had the tools to
read the model. At the earliest design phase, the model had been used for work with the
detailed development plan and there was no intent for a strict model-based construction
of the commercial property. Subsequently the first architectural BIM model worked
more as preface for esthetics than as a functional model.
“The client said [about working model based]: ‘If you can do this in such a large
project, we should be able to do it with an ordinary house.’” – C1
Early on stakeholders involved in the project had to be convinced of the new working
methods. Even if the responsible manager for the client wanted to work digitally the
deviation from standard practices was met with a certain degree of hesitation. The
subcontracted consultants were even more hesitant and it took several meetings before
they complied with the intentions of the project. One subcontracted consultant was so
against the idea of paperless construction that their contract was as a subsequence
canceled. Experiences C1 had from the infrastructure project showed the importance of
an intuitive and easy to handle model viewer for workers on site. The built-in viewer in
the BIM software wasn’t user friendly enough, and the external viewer in the large
infrastructure project had the same problem. This could have been a reason for the, by
C1 perceived, low usage of the model in that project. A small software developer with
a model viewer already used in practice was contracted, agile enough to adapt their
viewer to specifications made by the project managers yet technically mature enough
to have working solutions.
4.3.2 Design and procurement

The client’s FM representative (RE2) was involved early on in the design phase and
provided valuable insight in how to design for a better operation phase according to C1.
For instance, she could quickly see that doors in the laboratory area incorporated within
the building should be fitted with splash guards, increasing the lifespan of the doors.
According to RE2 is working entirely model based through the design phase a good
way of getting an overview of the coming building. Since the information available is
intuitive and easy to communicate, their clients benefited as well in turn. The
engineering and design consultants involved in the project had more frequent large
room modeling events than comparable projects C1 have been on earlier. Clash
detection visualized in VR, together with the ability of direct communication ensured a
smooth progress. That meant that, for instance, rooms where rework from the architect
was needed could be avoid by other professions minimizing the need for additional
rework. Even though the consultants engaged in the project put more hours on creating
a buildable model, creating working standards as they progressed, the total cost for
design when benchmarked to a similar project was only one percentage point higher.
Large parts of this C1 puts down to the time saved not producing 2D drawings. Some
details from the constructor had to be done in 2D in this project, but these are a minor
part compared to the usually high number of drawings needed.
“The extra cost for the innovative way of constructing had to be kept within budget.
No money was given to compensate this by the client” – C1
The focus on buildability was coupled with a strife to simplify the request for tender
send out to the different subcontractors. The request was coupled with software needed

to assess the model since not all subcontractors were used to work with BIM. The
possibility to extract lists of quantities coupled with information on exact location of
components in the building by the BIM software, ensured that communication with
subcontractors on exactly what to include in their tender ran very smoothly. The
subcontractors could instead of spending time on quantifying and finding weaknesses
in the tender documents to exploit, focus on giving a tender based on how to conduct
the work on site. Most subcontractors perceived the bidding process as fair and
transparent and welcomed not spending their time on quantities and ambiguous
drawings. This was evident by the offered tenders lying unusually close to each other
except for one subcontractor whose tender stood out as more expensive. An explanation
for this was that the subcontractor, instead of using the quantity list provided, had
printed 2D drawings of the model and calculated quantities from those. By getting lists
with set prices on every component from the subcontractors the project management
team could easily match actual cost estimated with the budget, modifying the model to
ensure the construction would meet the demands from their client.
4.3.3 Digital maturity

The project being among the first working completely digital needed to break digital
barriers on several layers. Leaving a standard way of designing and constructing meant
that several consultants had to be persuaded of the practice, as stated earlier. When
these individuals were convinced about the gain of working without paper drawings,
they in turn had to gain support and function as an ambassador in their respective
organization. The project was thus not just affecting the digital maturity of direct
participants but to an extent the digital maturity of entire organisations. Standards for
working smart with the model, like acquiring quantities and drawing buildable
electrical installations, weren’t present in the consultant group at the start of the project.
To do so they both had to find software solutions already available and construct
solutions of their own. Except the infrastructure project the consultant C1 had few
sources of inspiration before the work with the project. Though not explicitly asked by
the interviewer, no references to academic papers were made in the interview.
At the start of the project the real estate company had no demands for the delivering of
a digital model, and few demands on ensuring handover documents were compatible
with any FM software interphase. The real estate company joined a consortium to create
a digital platform for FM management during the design and construction phase. This
initiative was however not coupled to the model used in the project, thus the ability to
connect the different platforms isn’t streamlined or automatic.
“The technology to connect the different parts already exists, it’s just the matter of
thinking of it when designing.” – C1
4.3.4 Construction
To work entirely without printed drawings was met with scepsis by the workers on site.
An introduction to the BIM viewer was given to all workers on site upon arrival and
issues with the software raised by the workers during the construction could be
forwarded to the developer. Initially the handheld devices given to the different workers
were complemented with large screens on site that could be used. After a while those
were taken away since workers rarely used them. Wi-Fi was set up around the site
ensuring good connection to the cloud, and references were measured in and marked in

the concrete corresponding to gridlines existing in the model. By doing this, workers
always had reliable reference sources using the measuring tools in the viewer. The
number of reworks were reduced by 80 % when benchmarked with a similar project
since every subcontractor on site had access to the greater picture at all times, ensuring
consideration for the next profession when doing installations. There were some
problems with the model with regards to reality. The model, because of simplifications
in some generic BIM objects, lacked information for extra space taken by bends on
pipes etc. These could be marked in the viewer as a problem, and correspondent
consultant then got a message on where and what the problem was, often with a
recommendation from the worker on possible amendments. Since the BIM’s IFC
format is a one-way communication, the consultant, viewed the problem in hers/his
viewer and found its location in the model. Technically it could be automatically
transferred into the model, but this wasn’t done in the project as the viewer worked
well.
The ability to take quantities from the model had a huge impact on logistics. The exact
amount of material for each room could be calculated and adapted in length and width,
and delivered to site when needed. The construction site utilised a logistics centre and
a logistics coordinator for all its transports. Material came to the warehouse, got
repacked and labelled, and transported to site. All packaging often filling the waste
containers on the building site was sorted at the logistics centre, and the number of
transports to the building site could be diminished, also this by 80 % compared
benchmarked with another project.
“This was a very clean construction site thanks to the logistics solution.” – RE2
Including all of the construction workers into the viewer gave a large plus. Instead of
having a few people looking at every drawing, the project literally had hundreds of eyes
examine the model. Several recommendations from the workers regarding functions in
the viewer were given, meaning the viewer got better and better during the construction
phase, and stored more information.

A survey made amongst site workers showed that the vast majority was pleased with
working completely project based, and some comments were made on how this should
be the standard on all projects in the future. The efficiency with working model based
also shaved of almost two months of construction time, while finishing the project
below budget. At the same time controls like pressure testing of the pipes could be done
by the worker, documented in the viewer, and kept for quality inspections during
construction. Reducing the need for pdf documents to be created. Quality of the work
was also perceived higher by RE2 and any faults found during inspection by their
tenants, and were fixed almost immediately compared to sometimes weeks after
inspection. Inspection was also much easier than normal. Any faults could be
pinpointed in the viewer and send to the right place without the need for manual labour
writing down the issue in long documents. Reliable source material is a key to reaching
the right conclusions in the end and must be written in correctly. Wrong information in
is the base for higher costs in the end.
“Crap in means crap out.” – RE2

4.3.6 Standards and regulations
Working whit this project has been an agile process and much that’s been done are
novelty for all stakeholders involved. CM sees a risk of losing creativity and getting
stuck in the track when writing down procedures and standards. Much of the procedures
that’s written down change during the design phase anyway. Here there is a conflict
between CM and the project manager in charge as the latter wants as much as possible
written down, ensuring that information is kept and object bound. Time consumed when
writing things down can also hamper the speed of the process. Knowledge silos are a
problem with procedures not being written down. New people getting involved in the
project, even from companies already involved, need to be taught the ropes and
persuaded on the gains with working completely digital. A focus in a new project
underway is to add more functions, and to be even better at getting all information in.
For instance, HVAC components in this new project are not only traceable to exact
location in the building, but also connected to which electric circuit that serves them.
They are also working on making the model more deliverable into the systems and
standards of their client. The project completed was a floor for future projects, each
new project adding floors to reach the BIM models great potential. Including getting
the processes in design documented and stored for future use without losing agility.
The company where RE2 works are still working with digitalizing their portfolio and
are still working on defining levels of digital delivery needed. Only 1-2 % is newly built
today so a focus on the last 98-99 % very important. There is no pull in digitalisation
from the municipalities, quite the opposite, since and all documents and drawings
delivered to the municipality still needs to be in 2D. The municipality where the
building is situated likewise doesn’t demand any connectivity to their digital systems.
Contracts written with their customers are also done in 2D, with associated floor plans
regulating the rented space printed out from the model. In the future these documents
will be digital but they haven’t got there yet. The house generates lots of data but this
is today not shared with the tenants. This is partly because the real estate company
doesn’t have a digital way to share this with their customers, and partly due to the
tenants not requesting it. The matter of GDPR is also of note. What information are
they allowed to store, and to whom can it be distributed?
“This is here to stay, no questions about it.” – RE2

5 Analysis and discussion
5.1 Digital twin definition

Both the literature and the industry seem to have a similar understanding of the digital
twin definition. Both the literature and commercial reports from the industry tend to
present several definitions from both academia and the industry as a derivation to
motivate the working definition developed or used for their particular application (e.g.,
Arup, 2019; Tchana et al 2019). Both the industry and academia express the confusion
and lack of a common understanding of what the digital twin really is (Sjarov et al,
2020; Granlund group, 2020). Moreover, the more recent and elaborated definitions
such as Lim et al (2020), are easy to understand, applicational and similar to the
definitions found in the industry, although the definitions in the industry tend to be
glorified or selling (e.g., Digital twin consortium, 2021). Both Barata & Rupino (2018).
and Delottie (2019) emphasis the human interaction with the digital twin, although in
different context of manufacturing production and building utilization. Both the
literature and the industry talk about adaptive and intelligent digital twins, (Siemens
and TUM, 2019; Madni et al, 2019) although the building digital twins is not quite there
yet. When it comes to the connected concepts such as a digital model or digital shadow
(Kritzinger et al, 2018) it stills seems to be the most common concepts of the in the use
cases within construction and operation, based on the findings from the interviews. The
different concepts of digital construction sites and digital twins do seem to work from
two different directions towards the same goal of interconnectivity. As the digital twin
concept is considered as still evolving, along with new technology developments and
application fields, each study should provide their understanding of the digital twin in
order to contribute to future theory development and not cause more confusion.
The digital twin is a digital representation of a physical object. Within the built
environment and the architecture, engineering, construction, operation and facility
management (AECO/FM) sector, these physical objects would be buildings,
infrastructures, industries as well as the combined intersection of these object such as
cities, regions, countries or the entire planet. In order for a digital representation to be
categorized as a twin it has to follow the building throughout its lifecycle. The twins do
not have to be identical on every aspect but synchronized in a way so that the
construction and life span of the building as well as the built environment can become
sustainable. The digital twin needs to be both adaptive and intelligent in order to
integrate all actors and stakeholder, and provide the operational, tactical and strategical
value needed for the construction industry and society to become sustainable.
The digital twin differs from other virtual representation in the accuracy and amount of
the data. A virtual model only implies that it is a model of a building and that it is not
a physical representation. However, the digital representation has to have digits and
data that exist in the physical world. Moreover, the digital twin differs from both a
digital model and shadow in the automatic transference of data. A digital includes no
automatic data flow between the physical and digital building and would manually be
updated in order synchronized with each other. However, models might serve their
purpose without having to be updated e.g., a traditional BIM model in the design phase.
The digital shadow is better understood as a digital model that is being updated but with
a slightly delay in time, lack of automated data flow.

5.2 The digital twin paradigm
The role of technology as being integrated with social and organizational practiced
(Orlikowski & Scott, 2008; Gunderson, 2016) is represented in the findings. In both the
asset management and digital construction perspectives are the technology
implementations driven by social and organizational outcome rather than focusing on
just implementing technology. the change in mindset and a dominate design as
described by Peine (2008) also reflects the perspectives from the industry as both
mindsets and how work is preformed need to change. In line with the digital
transformation by Bockshecker et al (2018) do actors in the industry experience that
there has been a period of digitization or digitalization without changing practices or
business strategies. The coevolution of knowledge, institute efforts and technology in
production (Cantwell & Hayashi, 2016) is represented in the industry. The result shows
both individual entrepreneurs’ efforts, global network, organizations and institutes, as
well as similarities in the technology innovations, organizational methods and mindset
among the digital twin development. Moreover, the regional competitiveness, learning,
expertise, network, values and productivity, the is a noticeable difference on a global,
regional and local scale. In one region with a clear industrial road map of digital
construction and digital twins the industry was described as having similar
developments in different regions simultaneously. In another national context the actors
expressed a barrier of learning, sharing knowledge and expertise locally in the close
surrounding of the project in which innovation efforts were made. On the other hand,
networks that goes beyond the local context seems to be a better way to share the
knowledge, as well as the collaboration between production, academia and industry
organizations.
The digital construction use case do talk in terms of building information modelling
while, the asset management put BIM in the bigger, interoperability perspective of
digital twins. The document review in terms of websites presented a clear distinction
the capabilities of BIM and digital twins. The literature provided a less unified
understanding of the different concepts. Both literature in construction and the built
environment expressed change of direction towards digital twin away from BIM.
However, this change of direction does not imply the end of BIM hence all of the
literature and industry agrees that BIM would be the core and 3D model of the digital
twins. Digital twins and BIM integration is mentioned both in the literature for the
manufacturing industry and the construction industry, which shows as mutual
willingness to integrate and collaborate. As the digital twin and building information
management developed in parallel in mechanical engineering and the construction
industry, the digital twin tends to be more advanced that BIM. This might be due to the
inherent challenge of the construction process comparted to the manufacturing process,
or the industry imperfections mentioned by Granlund group (2020). However, BIM as
well as the digital twin can be understood as a technology, concept or a paradigm of a
cluster of innovations, shared mindset and operation methods. Since the shared mindset
is harder to coordinate within a technological paradigm a paradigm shift or extension
might help a more radical development and perspective of sustainability. Sine BIM is
largely related to productivity within design and construction the digital twin paradigm
could enhance the integration of operation and lifecycle consideration. Moreover, BIM
is specific to the construction industry, hence a digital twin paradigm could increase the
interoperability with external stakeholders, supply chain and components from other
industries and sectors.

5.3 Digital twin initiatives
The cross domain digital twin use mentioned by both the construction literature (e.g.,
Boje et al, 2020) and the manufacturing literature (e.g., Lim et al, 2020). The ecosystem
of connected digital twins is mentioned both within industry 4.0 in terms of a digital
industrial ecosystem, and in the context of the built environment in terms of a IoT value
adding ecosystem (Yang et al, 2020) with digital twins as the network core (Woodhead
et al, 2018). In the construction industry, Boje et al (2020) perspective is for the
construction digital twin to be connected and take in information from the entire
environment, eventually on a construction industry and built environment level. Grief
et al (2020) includes the site logistics and supply chain, on an informational, automation
billing and service level. This is found among the industry actors as well but in terms
of information about components and products being delivered to the construction site
or in operation and maintenance aspect from an asset management perspective. From
the digital construction perspective, the digital model was used for procurement of
subcontractors, and the as built model could be the foundation of automatic billing
although technology was not developed for that purpose in this project. On the global
scale innovation efforts were found for digital twin ecosystem cross industry domains.
All the triangulation findings from the document review, interviews and observations
show the importance of constantly innovation, development and learning. The move
from pilot project and gradually changing the operation and business processes, into
more transparently sharing improvements across organizational and industry boarders
is not only good for sustainability development but also generates more value for the
organization who is sharing their success and innovations. Sharing standards,
developing software application and sharing with other users, or sharing project in use
case database could contributes to a more widespread and uniform development. This
fits the context of interconnection, interoperability and digitalization that is the theme
of digital twins. Being able to collaborate and communicate across the globe enables
the sharing of ideas, perspectives and innovations. However, all the praise, awards,
buzzwords, catchphrases and marketing sometimes make it hard to keep up with the
state of the art within the industry, when suddenly everyone have a digital twin and are
at the leading edge. The truly interesting cases are the ones beyond the state of the art,
and to know when to know when a new project runs past it. Perhaps the closer
collaboration between the academia and the industry is an answer to this. As expressed
by one of the studied use cases, the need of documenting all new practices and new
technology utilization is killing the engagement and efforts to keep pushing the
innovation forward. With a digital twin ecosystem or the documentation and actual
progress might not have to separate work practices. With digitalization and automation,
the progresses and change of work process could be automatically shared with all
stakeholders and also eliminate the duplication and errors of manual documentation. It
would be easy to know when old practices and technologies are outdated, and value
could be provided within the organization even before the digital twin ecosystem grow
in population. When it comes to the technology development, change of mindset and
practices it might be true that all the technology development triggers the change of
practices. And that the digitalization and sustainability perspective will be change
people’s minds and trigger the development of the digital twin and digital construction
that are fast enough but also consider unwanted consequences and challenges with to
fast innovation.

5.4 Lifecycle perspective
Similarly, to regular twins, the digital twin is born at the same time as its physical twin,
at the project delivery. However, this means that they also that they follow each other
in the development before the project delivery. The physical building and its digital
twin are initiated at the same time. As expressed in the result, its industry partitioners
should think digital twin before thinking about building. When the idea, of a new
building is born, all information exchange and storage are made within the ecosystem
of digital twin. As the definitions of digital twins often describe it as a digital
representation of a physical object. It easy to associate it with a model of the buildings
physical structure. And it is easy to forget the first PLM context in which the digital
twin was the component view of how information could be gathered from all lifecycle
stages, centered around the product and thus illustrated in digital representation of the
building. Hence, it is the digitalized information and processes through design,
construction, and operation that is the main purpose of the digital twin. The illustration
of a twin is so that it is easier to understand, manage and use all this data. The ecosystem
of digital twin allows the early design of the building to interconnect with the city digital
twin, urban planning and enables digitalized procurement processes. Unlike today,
when the BIM model is connected, the information exchange is limited to 3D
comparison and information that’s have been added into the building information
modelling, BIM and Geographic information system, GIS. The interconnected and
predictive world of digital twins would take the automation one step further and add
more information sources, include more stakeholders in the collaborative and flexible
work of improving the early design.
As the design moves forward and it is time to start building, BIM or digital twins today
is starting to integrate the operation technology with the information in the construction
phase. Moreover, blockchain is similarly to the digital thread of the digital twin and
have the capacity to trace engineering decision. Hence, a digital twin should not only
integrate the operation technology, OT, and the information technology, IT, but also
include the engineering technology, ET. The document review show evidence of adding
blockchain and engineering technology into the equation of digital twins. However, for
the use cases in the interview studies, they are still working with the information
integration, and starts integrating operation technologies. Integrating the engineering
technology of information is still a dream, it is possible to see the advantages, but it is
not yet on the horizon. Instead logging the different decision and store that information
in a database and look for in manually is the closest practice to be found in practice.
When it comes to the operation phase, the value of collaboration and interconnection
of digital twins is well acknowledged, but the work forward is a slowly progressing in
the very long distance to travel. The digital twin can be the tool to improve the
renovation, rehabilitation, reconstruction and demolition of buildings. Due to the
interconnection other building digital twins and complete information of components
and how they have been operated and manages, components and elements can more
easily to other buildings or purposes within society and the built environment.
Especially if factories and the construction include the production process in the digital
twin of the product they are constructing.

5.5 Project delivery
Love & Matthew (2019) mention that the owners can require a digital twin at handover
and project delivery, but do not elaborate it is a digital model or how the digital delivery
should be extracted, integrated or extended from the construction phase to the operation
phase. In practice no such digital twin or requirement of a digital twin at hand over were
found. More in line with Tchana et al (2020) Xi et al (2014) does the problem of
automatic data transfer between the phases still seem to exist. However, the value and
benefit of such a digital delivery is recognized, descried and sought. Hence need and
demand drivers to make the asset delivery more effective and efficient are represented
as well as to enhance the real-time automated operation and maintenance. The
intelligent building management system by Yang et al (2020) and its initial design,
installation, operation and improvement phase might possibly also occurs synchronized
with the different project phases of construction production.
The collaborative delivery approaches of today such as, integrated project delivery,
IPD, integrated digital delivery, IDD, and virtual design and construction, VDC has
come a long way with changing the way project are being delivery and collaboration
between actors. By digitalizing design, construction, supply chain, asset delivery and
management the different phases can more easily be integrated and together work
towards delivering the best product possible. By shifting focus from transferring work
and payment between the different actors and instead focus on transforming each
actor’s contribution towards the building being delivered, all actors and stakeholders
would benefit more equally and fairy. By using the digital twin there would be a less
need for collaboration contracts, and the high load of planning prior to the contract.
Moreover, the blockchain and digital tread, enables the automation of payments so they
can still be based on the work that has been exchange and not have to be split at the
project delivery. As mentioned in the result, these collaborations show the change of
mindsets that are currently occurring in the construction industry. The integration with
supply chain and sub-contractors is slowly taken place but will be further enabled by
the IT, OT and ET integration of digital twins.
Moreover, the construction site can communicate with the city digital twin at both city,
block and building level. This could digitalize and further enhance changes in the work
environment plan for the construction site. It could also integrate the redirection of
traffic as well as transportation to and logistics of the construction site. It could enhance
the control of energy consumption or even allow the construction site to become an
energy producer.
As the BIM model today often survive from the design stage to the construction stage,
more detailed BIM model in design can be used for operating the construction
processes. Similarly, the model can survive the project delivery and enhance the
operation and maintenance of building utilization. Today the information from BIM
model is neither extracted, extended or integrated at the transaction from construction
to operation phase, but rather copied manually. However, the benefits today with an as
built model at project delivery is the more accurate and larger amount of information
to transfer over to operation stage. Integration the information between operation,
construction and design is considered being crucial for the sustainability and building
lifecycle management.

5.6 Digital twin framework
The digital twin concept demands an ecosystem of digital twins. Boje et al (2021) talks
about a construction digital twin which to function ultimately needs to be connected to
data acquired by surrounding infrastructure. Here a city digital twin as the one in
Karlskrona could be both the base for information as well as a collector of data created
by the construction digital twin. This data together with data from buildings already in
operation is in turn a base for other digital twins to use. Actors in the supply chain as
described by Greif et al (2020) can adapt their logistic routes not only on their own
digital twin but on traffic patterns in the city as well. Goals for sustainability based on
digital twins on a macro level like in the Norwegian construction industry can be
measured by several digital twins in an early lifestyle assessment like the one proposed
by Kaewunruen et al (2020). A vital part in the ecosystem is a need for a sociomaterial
view on technology as described by Orlikowski and Scott (2008), and a respect for the
people living within the built environment.
5.6.1 A digital twin ecosystem

Below is a proposal for a digital twin framework for the built environment. It highlights
the digital twin ecosystem’s dependencies on several actors. The proposed framework
is made to illustrate the scalability of digital twins. Starting at a micro level information
can be assessed on a building level, itself ranging from early design to construction site
to demolition. Zooming out to a city level the connection between buildings and
infrastructure to flows of people and traffic can be made. Shifts in utilization of system
infrastructure like power in different districts of the city can be analysed in real time
ensuring an effective and continuous flow for the city’s inhabitants. On a macro level
cities and municipalities are connected to each other, larger infrastructure can be
optimized, traffic flows analysed, and impacts on the environment by state regulation
can be simulated and optimal course drawn based on set parameters.
Figure 11 Ecosystem of digital twins in the built environment

5.6.2 From early design to project delivery
The prerequisite to construct a building is analysed by several actors. Both when doing
development plans within the municipality, and when real estate companies plan future
development. Here an early design digital twin for a building can be automatically
compared to existing development plans to make sure the requirements set by the
municipality is met by the suggested building. When the model is mature enough to go
forward a building permit can be applied for and the next phase can begin. The proposed
design is enhanced to be a template for the as built building, and used for planning and
constructing the building. Connecting the building to its district surrounding ensures
smooth logistics, and permits for upcoming events around the construction site can be
sought and maintained automatically based on building progress. Conflict between the
construction site and other ongoing activity in its surroundings can also be mitigated by
having information easily accessible for all stakeholders. During project delivery a final
check on the buildings compliance with regulations and demands is made and the
building is now an as built digital twin connected to the city on both a visual and
utilisation level. By using blockchain and designated authorisation stakeholders on
different layers get access to information and data produced by the building.
City Level: District Level: Building Level:

Building Permit Construction Site Energy/Utilization
City
Digital Twin
Building
Digital Twin
Early Design & Project
Design Construction Delivery
Figure 12 Digital twin interoperability trough design and construction project management

5.7 Methodology
One of the shortcomings with the methodology chosen for this research is the non-
digitalized workflow. As preforming a research regarding interconnectivity and
interoperability between all different phases and components of a project, it becomes
obvious how much information can be duplicated, disappear or how long time it takes
to find everything. Software solutions for extracting data form literature review,
reference management, and for analyzing the research data would have facilities the
process. Moreover, it would further improve the collaboration between the authors and
intersections with supervisors. It would be a tool of facility management for the authors
to focus on the core aspects of the research, e.g., findings, interpretations and ideas
creation. Also improve the accuracy selection, validation and data extraction form data
sources.
The mixed method on an exploratory sequential design of quantitative findings

informing the direction the qualitative research provides a more confident
generalization of the research findings. However, it is not evidential that the result
credibility in representing the research population, or that the use cases represent the
leading edge of digital twin implementations. Furthermore, the research bias is partly
influenced by authors previous practical experience of the construction industry,
previous research projects and education.
5.8 Sustainability and ethical aspect

The interconnectivity, data availability and transparency race a lot of ethical questions
within the society. The organizations traditionally want to protect their information in
order to stay competitive and maximize profit. However, times are changing and in
order to keep up with the market and fast developing technology organizations need to
be more transformative oriented rather than transaction oriented. By sharing more, it is
mutual, and organization can hence also receive information from much more other
actors. What is more important is to consider the individuals and their personal rights.
Which can be consider with an entanglement of technology, practices and mindset.
5.9 Further research

Further research is recommended within the areas of technology development and
implementation in practice. Further research can also focus on the network of
entrepreneurs and ecosystem o use cases in order to keep trach of the digital twin
initiatives, share innovation and knowledge, and not invent the wheel more time than
one. Another topic would be to keep the humans in to the loop of digital twin and not
to replace them with computers in the context of industry 4.0 in order to invite them
back in the context of industry 5.0.

6 Conclusion
The digital twin is a digital representation of a physical object. Within the built
environment and construction industry these objects refer to buildings, infrastructure,
industry facilities as well as the combined intersection of these object such as cities,
regions, countries or the entire planet. In order for digital representation to be
considered a twin, the digital representation has to follow the building throughout its
lifecycle. Meaning that the idea of the digital twin is created in the same instance as the
idea of a new building. The twins will also grow up together and enter the working life
at the same time. However, the digital twins do not have to be identical in every aspect
of life or interests, only follow each other in such a matter that interconnects and unites
the built environment towards sustainability goal, including productivity, efficiency
and competitiveness for the construction industry.
The construction digital twin should not only survive thought early design to project
delivery. The ecosystem of digital twins allows the digital twin for the building to
communicate with the city digital twin in early design, construction and during
operation. In the early stage the digital twin for the building is interconnected with the
city digital twin in aspects of urban planning and procurement procedures. In the
construction phase can the site logistics such as, transportation and work environment
plans can be integrated and with the scalable city digital twin. The construction site
would then be more similar to the smart manufactories. Moreover, the building digital
twin can communicate to the city digital twin in terms of energy consumption and
predictive heath management. The digital is more than a cluster of new emerging
technologies, it its way of preforming organizational practices and new mindset. The
mindset of working together for a sustainable planet and future.

7 References
Arup (2019) Digital twin: Towards a meaningful framework. London, Arupt. Available
at: www.arup.com/digitaltwinreport
Atkins (2019) Digital twins for the built environment: an introduction to the
opportunities, benefits, challenges and risks. London, The institute of
engineering and technology. Available at: www.theiet.org/media/4719/digital-
twins-for-the-built-environment.pdf
Badenko V. L., Bolshakov N. S., Tishchenko E. B., Fedotov A. A., Celani A. C. &
Yadykin V. K. (2021). Integration of digital twin and BIM technologies within
factories of the future. Magazine of Civil Engineering, 101(1), 10114
Barata, J., & Rupino Cunha, P. (2018). Understanding Sociomaterial Transformations
in Industry 4.0: An Action Research Study. 39th International Conference on
Information Systems, December 13-16, San Francisco, California, USA.
Bockshecker A., Hackstein S. & Baumöl U. (2018). Systematization of the term digital
transformation and its phenomena from a socio-technical perspective–A
literature review. 26th ECIS Beyond Digitization - Facets of Socio-Technical
Change, June 23-28, Portsmouth, UK.
Boje C., Guerriero A., Kubicki S. & Rezgui Y. (2020). Towards a semantic
Construction Digital Twin: Directions for future research. Automation in
Construction, 114, 103179.
Building Smart (2020) Enabling an Ecosystem of Digital Twins: How to unlock
economic, social, environmental and business value for the built asset industry.
Hertfordshire, building smart international. Available at: www.buildingsmart.
org/buildingsmart-positioning-paper-enabling-an-ecosystem-of-digital-twins/
Byggenæringens Landsforening (2017) Digitalt veikart: for en heldigitalisert,
konkurransedyktig og bærekraftig BAE-næring. Available at:
https://www.bnl.no/siteassets/dokumenter/rapporter/digitalt-veikart-2017---
full-rapport.pdf
Cantwell, J., & Hayashi, T. (2019). Paradigm Shift in Technologies and Innovation
Systems. Springer.
Carayannis E. G., Barth T. D. & Campbell D. F. (2012). The Quintuple Helix
innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation.
Journal of innovation and entrepreneurship, 1(1), 1-12.
Cheng J., Zhang H., Tao F. & Juang C. F. (2020). DT-II: Digital twin enhanced
Industrial Internet reference framework towards smart manufacturing. Robotics
and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 62, 101881.
Deloitte (2019) Digital twinning in real estate Humanizing buildings with Industry 4.0,
Reflextion magazine 9(2) Available at: www2.deloitte.com/contentdam/
Deloitte/global/Documents/Public-Sector/gx-reflexion-issue9-full.pdf
Deng M., Menassa C.C. & Kamat V.R. (2021), From BIM to digital twins: a systematic
review of the evolution of intelligent building representations in the AEC-FM
industry. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 26(5), 58-83.

Digital twin consortium (2021) Digital Twin Consortium is The Authority in Digital
Twin. Available at: https://www.digitaltwinconsortium.org/about-us/ [2021-06-
10]
Digital Twin City Centre (2021) Research at DTCC Available at: https://dtcc.chalmers.
se/research/ [2021-06-10]
Elghaish F., Abrishami S. & Hosseini M. R. (2020). Integrated project delivery with
blockchain: An automated financial system. Automation in Construction, 114,
103182.
Fan C., Zhang C., Yahja A. & Mostafavi A. (2021). Disaster City Digital Twin: A
vision for integrating artificial and human intelligence for disaster management.
International Journal of Information Management, 56, 102049.
Garel G. (2013) A history of project management models: From pre-models to the
standard models. International Journal of Project Management, 31(5), pp. 663–
669.
Glaessgen E. & Stargel D. (2012). The digital twin paradigm for future NASA and US
Air Force vehicles. In 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural
dynamics and materials conference. April 23-26, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
Granlund (2020) Building digital twins, Helsinki, Granlund Group. Available at:
https://issuu.com/granlundoy/docs/building_digital_twins?fr=sZWU1YjI1ODI
yNg
Greif T., Stein N. & Flath C. M. (2020). Peeking into the void: Digital twins for
construction site logistics. Computers in Industry, 121, 103264.
Grieves M. W. (2005). Product lifecycle management: the new paradigm for
enterprises. International Journal of Product Development, 2(1-2), 71-84.
Gunderson R. (2016). The sociology of technology before the turn to technology.
Technology in Society, 47, 40-48.
Harmaakorpi V., Kauranen I., Haikonen A. & Center L. (2003). The shift in the techno-
socio-economic paradigm and regional competitiveness. 43rd Conference of
European Regional Sciences Association. August 27-30, Jyväskylä, Finland 27-
31.
Heaton J. & Parlikad A. K. (2020). Asset Information Model to support the adoption of
a Digital Twin: West Cambridge case study. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 53(3), 366-
371.
Hellmuth R., Frohnmayer J. & Sulzmann F. (2020). Design and application of a digital
factory model for factory restructuring. Procedia CIRP, 91, 158-163.
Hong T., Chen Y., Luo X., Luo N. & Lee S. H. (2020). Ten questions on urban building
energy modeling. Building and environment, 168, 106508.
Hwang B. G., Ngo J. & Her P. W. Y. (2020). Integrated Digital Delivery:
Implementation status and project performance in the Singapore construction
industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 262, 121396.
Kaewunruen S., Peng S. & Phil-Ebosie, O. (2020). Digital twin aided sustainability and
vulnerability audit for subway stations. Sustainability, 12(19), 7873

Ketzler B., Naserentin V., Latino F., Zangelidis C., Thuvander L., & Logg A. (2020).
Digital Twins for Cities: A State-of-the-Art Review. Built Environment, 46(4),
547-573.
Kritzinger W., Karner M., Traar G., Henjes J. & Sihn W. (2018). Digital Twin in
manufacturing: A categorical literature review and classification. IFAC-
PapersOnLine, 51(11), 1016-1022.
Lim, K.Y.H., Zheng, P. & Chen, C. (2020) A state-of-the-art survey of Digital Twin:
techniques, engineering product lifecycle management and business innovation
perspectives. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 31, 1313–1337.
Liu Z., Lu, Y., Shen M. & Peh L. C. (2020). Transition from Building Information
Modeling (BIM) to Integrated Digital Delivery (IDD) in Sustainable Building
Management: A Knowledge Discovery Approach Based Review. Journal of
Cleaner Production, 291, 125223.
Love P. E. & Matthews J. (2019). The ‘how’ of benefits management for digital
technology: From engineering to asset management. Automation in
Lu Q., Parlikad A. K., Woodall P., Don Ranasinghe G., Xie X., Liang Z., Konstantinou
E., James Heaton J. & Schooling, J. (2020a). Developing a digital twin at
building and city levels: case study of West Cambridge campus. Journal of
Management in Engineering, 36(3), 05020004.
Lu Q., Parlikad A. K., Woodall P., Ranasinghe G. D. & Heaton J. (2019a). Developing
a dynamic digital twin at a building level: Using Cambridge campus as case
study. In International Conference on Smart Infrastructure and Construction.
Driving data-informed decision-making (pp. 67-75). ICE Publishing
Lu Q., Xie X., Heaton J., Parlikad A.K. & Schooling J. (2019b), From BIM towards
digital twin: strategy and future development for smart asset management.
International Workshop on Service Orientation in Holonic and Multi-Agent
Manufacturing, Springer
Lu Q., Xie X., Parlikad A. K., Schooling J. M., & Konstantinou E. (2020b). Moving
from building information models to digital twins for operation and
maintenance. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Smart
Infrastructure and Construction.
Ma Z., Zhang D. & Li J. (2018). A dedicated collaboration platform for Integrated
Project Delivery. Automation in Construction, 86, 199-209.
Madni, A. M., Madni, C. C., & Lucero, S. D. (2019). Leveraging digital twin
technology in model-based systems engineering. Systems, 7(1), 7.
Maskuriy R., Selamat A., Ali K. N., Maresova P. & Krejcar O. (2019). Industry 4.0 for
the construction industry: how ready is the industry? Applied Sciences, 9(14),
2819.
McKinsey (2017) Reinventing construction: A route to higher productivity. McKinsey
Global Institute
Nahavandi S. (2019). Industry 5.0: A human-centric solution. Sustainability, 11(16),
4371.

Nielsen C. P., da Silva E. R. & Yu F. (2020). Digital Twins and Blockchain: Proof of
Concept. Procedia CIRP, 93, 251-255.
Nnaji C. & Karakhan A. A. (2020). Technologies for safety and health management in
construction: Current use, implementation benefits and limitations, and
adoption barriers. Journal of Building Engineering, 29, 101212.
Orlikowski W. J. & Scott S. V. (2008). The entangling of technology and work in
organizations. Information Systems and Innovation Group, Department of
Management, London School of Economics and Political Science.
Pan Y. & Zhang L. (2021a). A BIM-data mining integrated digital twin framework for
advanced project management. Automation in Construction, 124, 103564.
Pan Y. & Zhang L. (2021b). Roles of artificial intelligence in construction engineering
and management: A critical review and future trends. Automation in
Peine A. (2008). Technological paradigms and complex technical systems—the case of
smart homes. Research Policy, 37(3), 508-529.
Piroozfar P., Farr E. R., Zadeh A. H., Inacio S. T., Kilgallon S. & Jin R. (2019).
Facilitating building information modelling (BIM) using integrated project
delivery (IPD): a UK perspective. Journal of Building Engineering, 26, 100907.
Pollack J. (2007) The changing paradigms of project management. International
Journal of Project Management, 25, 266-274.
Putz B., Dietz M., Empl P. & Pernul G. (2021). Ethertwin: Blockchain-based secure
digital twin information management. Information Processing & Management,
58, 102425.
Raj P. & Evangeline P. (2020). The Digital Twin Paradigm for Smarter Systems and
Environments: The Industry Use Cases. Academic Press.
Siemens & Tum International GmbH (2019) Built environment Digital Twinning.
Institute of advanced study, Technical University of Munich. Available at:
https://publications.cms.bgu.tum.de/reports/2020_Brilakis_BuiltEnvDT.pdf
Sjarov M., Lechler T., Fuchs J., Brossog M., Selmainer A., Faltus F., Donhauser T. &
Franke J. (2020). The Digital Twin Concept in Industry: A Review and
Systematization. 25th IEEE International Conference on Emerging
Technologies and Factory Automation. September 8–11, Vienna, Austria.
Smart built environment (2017) Att bygga skepp på Marken. Stockholm Avaliable at:
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/57e934f0bebafba41135e0fa/t/5d1783027
4b496000130db5c/1561821964910/Att+bygga+skepp+p%C3%A5+marken+-
+Bygg40.pdf
Srewil Y. & Scherer R.J. (2013) Effective Construction Process Monitoring and
Control through a Collaborative Cyber-Physical Approach. In: Camarinha-
Matos L.M., Scherer R.J. (eds) Collaborative Systems for Reindustrialization.
PRO-VE 2013. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology,
vol 408. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Tao F., Zhang, H., Liu A. & Nee A. Y. (2018). Digital twin in industry: State-of-the-
art. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 15(4), 2405-2415.

Tetik M., Peltokorpi A., Seppänen O. & Holmström J. (2019). Direct digital
construction: Technology-based operations management practice for
continuous improvement of construction industry performance. Automation in
construction, 107, 102910.
Tchana Y., Ducellier G. & Remy S. (2019). Designing a unique Digital Twin for linear
infrastructures lifecycle management. Procedia CIRP, 84, 545-549.
Woodhead, R., Stephenson, P., & Morrey, D. (2018). Digital construction: From point
solutions to IoT ecosystem. Automation in Construction, 93, 35-46.
Xie X., Lu Q., Parlikad A. K., & Schooling J. M. (2020). Digital Twin Enabled Asset
Anomaly Detection for Building Facility Management. IFAC-PapersOnLine,
53(3), 380-385.
Xu, L. D., Xu, E. L., & Li, L. (2018). Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends.
International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2941-2962.
Xu X., Ma L. & Ding L. (2014). A framework for BIM-enabled life-cycle information
management of construction project. International Journal of Advanced
Robotic Systems, 11(8), 126.
Yang C. H., Lee K. C. & Li S. E. (2020). A mixed activity-based costing and resource
constraint optimal decision model for IoT-oriented intelligent building
management system portfolios. Sustainable Cities and Society, 60, 102142.
Zhuang C., Miao T., Liu J. & Xiong H. (2021). The Connotation of Digital Twin, and
the Construction and Application Method of Shop-floor Digital Twin. Robotics
and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 68, 102075.

DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECHTURE AND
CIVIL ENGINEERING
www.chalmers.se
11

2021 ACEX30 Tomas Mertala - Jenny Strålman

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

2021 ACEX30 Tomas Mertala - Jenny Strålman

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

2021 ACEX30 Tomas Mertala - Jenny Strålman

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

11

Construction Digital Twin

DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECHTURE AND CIVIL ENGINEERING

DIVISION OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

Construction Digital Twin

Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering

Master’s Thesis in Design and Construction Project Management

© TOMAS MERTALA-LINDSAY & JENNY STRÅLMAN, 2021

Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering

CHALMERS Architecture and Civil Engineering, Master’s Thesis ACEX30 III

4 RESULT AND FINDINGS 21

5 ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION 32

IV CHALMERS, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Master’s Thesis ACEX30

Table 1 Selected articles in initial literature search......................................................18

CHALMERS Architecture and Civil Engineering, Master’s Thesis ACEX30 V

Gothenburg June 2021

VI CHALMERS, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Master’s Thesis ACEX30

CHALMERS Architecture and Civil Engineering, Master’s Thesis ACEX30 VII

Integration of construction processes, disciplines, actors, and stakeholders across

CHALMERS Architecture and Civil Engineering, Master’s Thesis ACEX30 1

1.3 Research questions

RQ1 Clarify terminology, technology, concept, origin

1.4 Scope and delimitations

2 CHALMERS, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Master’s Thesis ACEX30

2.1 Role of technology

2.1.1 Technology progress

CHALMERS Architecture and Civil Engineering, Master’s Thesis ACEX30 3

2.1.2 Innovation framework

4 CHALMERS, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Master’s Thesis ACEX30

PLM Aerospace/Space Smart Manufacturing

2.2.1 Conceptual origin

CHALMERS Architecture and Civil Engineering, Master’s Thesis ACEX30 5

2.2.2 Theoretical development

6 CHALMERS, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Master’s Thesis ACEX30

Digital Real-time 2-way communication

Figure 4 Definition of a digital twin (Lim et al, 2020)

CHALMERS Architecture and Civil Engineering, Master’s Thesis ACEX30 7

Physical Physical Physical

Manual Data Flow

2.2.5 Smart manufacturing

8 CHALMERS, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Master’s Thesis ACEX30

2.2.6 Industry 4.0

When it comes to digital transformation, it is commonly understood as digitization

CHALMERS Architecture and Civil Engineering, Master’s Thesis ACEX30 9

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th

2.2.7 Application fields

Physical Physical Physical

Figure 8 Level of maturity (Madni et al, 2019).

10 CHALMERS, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Master’s Thesis ACEX30

CHALMERS Architecture and Civil Engineering, Master’s Thesis ACEX30 11

12 CHALMERS, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Master’s Thesis ACEX30

AI or Artificial intelligence is the use of advanced logarithms to make machines able

VR or virtual reality make a human experience a virtual model or space by simulating

CHALMERS Architecture and Civil Engineering, Master’s Thesis ACEX30 13

2.3.3 Smart construction site

14 CHALMERS, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Master’s Thesis ACEX30

2.3.4 Project delivery

Elgaish et al (2020) describe the emerging literature on smart contracts in construction,

CHALMERS Architecture and Civil Engineering, Master’s Thesis ACEX30 15

16 CHALMERS, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Master’s Thesis ACEX30